The Healthcare Resort Of Colorado Springs

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

62.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 419 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 68.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 170 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 1.11 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 98% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 28% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 97 beds and averages 93.0 residents a day — about 96% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.80 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.97 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.15 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.00 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.13 on weekdays — 22% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 1.13 to 0.56 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 54% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

21 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 10 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · K2023-11-08 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — pattern
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to create an environment that protected six (#8, #4, #15, #87, #253, and #254) of eight out of 42 sample residents from mental and verbal abuse, contributing to residents experiencing, among other emotions, night terrors, anxiety, fear, and humiliation. In interviews with Residents #8, #15, and #253, the residents stated certified nurse aide (CNA) #1 slammed and dropped food trays on their tables and slammed their doors shut, mocked them, yelled at them, made them feel like an idiot, and feel anxious, frightened, and humiliated. Resident #4 had tears in her eyes when CNA #1's name was mentioned; when asked if she could talk further about him, she shook her head no and appeared sad. Although the residents and visitors either spoke with management or filed complaint/concern forms about their interactions with CNA #1 as early as February 2023 and later in August, September, and October, their reports, despite their repetition, were not recognized as…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-06-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure food was prepared, distributed and served under sanitary conditions in the main kitchen. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Thaw meat in a safe manner; and, -Ensure jewelry was not worn during food preparation and meal service. Findings include: I. Failed to thaw meat in a safe manner A. Professional reference The Colorado Retail Food Establishment Regulations, effective 3/16/24, were retrieved on 6/30/25. It read in pertinent part, Time/temperature control for safety food shall be thawed completely submerged under running water with sufficient water velocity to agitate and float off loose particles in an overflow. (3-501.13) B. Facility policy and procedure The Safe Thawing Practices policy and procedure, revised September 2017, was received from the regional dietary consultant (RDC) on 6/26/25 at 11:42 a.m. It read in pertinent part, Thaw items in clean water. When water is running, it should be running fast enough to agitate any loose particles. C. Observations During a continuous observation…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-06-26 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to honor resident choices for residents residing on three of four units of the facility. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure residents could choose to eat in the dining room at dinner time and on the weekends. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Promoting/Maintaining Resident Self-Determinations policy and procedure, revised December 2024, was provided by the director of nursing (DON) on 6/26/25 at 1:29 p.m. It read in pertinent part, Each resident has the right to make choices about aspects of his or her life in the facility that are significant to the resident. Each resident has the right to interact with members of the community and participate in community activities both inside and outside of the facility. The facility will accommodate the resident preferences to the extent possible. II. Resident interviews and observations On 6/23/25 at 4:30 p.m. Resident #60 was sitting next to a round table close to the north hall nursing station, accompanied by an unidentified resident. Resident #60 said…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-06-26 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure medications and biologicals were stored and labeled properly according to professional standards in two of four medications carts and one of one vaccine storage refrigerators. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Ensure vaccinations were not stored in dormitory style refrigerator; -Ensure expired vaccines were removed from refrigerators; -Ensure Tubersol (used to test for tuberculosis) vials were dated upon opening; -Ensure medication carts were clean from loose pills; and, -Ensure medications were stored according to route. Findings include: I. Professional reference According to the Vaccine Storage and Handling Tool-kit, dated 3/29/24, retrieved on 6/30/25, from https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/hcp/downloads/storage-handling-toolkit.pdf, it revealed in pertinent part, Do not store any vaccine in a dormitory-style or bar-style combined refrigerator/freezer unit under any circumstances. These units have a single exterior door and an evaporator…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-26 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living (ADL) received the necessary services and assistance for bathing for two (#144 and #146) of three residents reviewed for ADLs out of 39 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Provide bathing for Resident #144 to maintain the resident's personal hygiene; and, -Provide the necessary shower assistance for Resident #146, according to the resident's care plan. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Activities of Daily Living/Maintain Abilities policy and procedure, reviewed December of 2024, was provided by the director of nursing (DON) on 6/26/25 at 9:09 a.m. It read in pertinent part, It is the policy of this facility that residents are given the appropriate treatment and services to maintain or improve his/her abilities. Residents who are unable to carry out activities of daily living (ADL) will receive necessary services or support…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-26 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
  Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure one (#76) of three residents reviewed for activities out of 39 sample residents received an ongoing program of activities designed to meet the needs and interests, and promote physical, medical and psychosocial well-being. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure group were available for Resident #76 on the weekends per her preference. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Activities policy and procedure, revised December 2024, was received from the director of nursing (DON) on 6/26/25 at 1:29 p.m. It revealed in pertinent part, It is the policy of this facility to ensure that residents have the right to choose the types of activities and social events in which they wish to participate. Residents are encouraged to choose the types of activities and social events in which they prefer to participate in. Daily activities, including those on weekends and holidays, are provided, as well as scheduled religious and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-26 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide necessary respiratory care and services consistent with professional standards of practice and the comprehensive person-centered care plan for two (#60 and #74) of three residents reviewed for respiratory care out of 39 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure that Resident #60 and Resident #74 received oxygen therapy in accordance with their physician's orders. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Oxygen Administration, Storage, and Handling policy, revised December 2024, was provided by the director of nursing (DON) on 6/26/25 at 9:28 a.m. It read in pertinent part, The purpose of this policy is to educate staff on the safety guidelines and usage requirements for medical gases and their cylinders. Upon orientation and annually thereafter, all staff shall be trained on the following: Oxygen therapy should be administered by the licensed nurse as ordered by the physician or as a nursing…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-26 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate was less than five percent (%). Specifically, the facility had a medication error rate of 7.14%, which was two errors out of 28 opportunities for error. Findings include I. Professional reference According to [NAME], P.A., [NAME], A.G., et.al., Fundamentals of Nursing, 10 ed. (2020), E.[NAME], St. Louis Missouri, pp. 606-607. Take appropriate actions to ensure the patient receives medication as prescribed and within the times prescribed and in the appropriate environment. Professional Standards such as nursing scope and standards of practice apply to the activity of medication administration. To prevent medication errors, follow the seven rights of medication administration consistently every time you administer medications. Many medication errors can be linked in some way to an inconsistency in adhering to these seven rights: 1. The right medication 2. The right dose 3. The right patient 4. The right…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-26 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolated
  Provide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure physician ordered laboratory services were provided in a timely manner for one (#12) of two residents reviewed for laboratory services out of 39 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure timely follow-up for Resident #12's urine sample, which was sent to the laboratory (lab) without being labeled with the resident's identifying information. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Laboratory Services and Reporting policy and procedure, revised December 2024, was provided by the director of nursing (DON) on 6/26/25 at 1:37 p.m. It read in pertinent part, The facility must provide or obtain laboratory services to meet the needs of its residents. The facility is responsible for the timeliness of the [laboratory] services. II. Resident #12 A. Resident status Resident #12, age [AGE], was admitted on [DATE]. According to the June 2025 computerized physician orders (CPO), diagnoses included diabetes, chronic…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-26 · tag F0849 — isolated
  Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY IV. Resident #60 A. Resident status Resident #60, age greater than 65, was admitted on [DATE]. According to the [DATE] CPO, diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, hyperlipidemia, anxiety disorder and depression. The [DATE] MDS assessment revealed the resident was cognitively intact with a BIMS score of 15 out of 15. She required set-up assistance with eating, moderate assistance with personal hygiene, maximum assistance with transfers, and toileting. The resident was receiving oxygen therapy. The assessment indicated the resident was not receiving hospice services. B. Record review Review of the [DATE] CPO revealed Resident #60 was admitted to hospice services related to her diagnosis of COPD on [DATE]. -Review of Resident #60's comprehensive care plan, revised on [DATE], revealed the care plan did not indicate the resident was receiving hospice services. The care plan did not include a delineation of care between the facility and the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-11-08 · tag F0574 — pattern
  The resident has the right to receive notices in a format and a language he or she understands.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents received notices in a written description of their legal rights. Specifically, the facility failed to post a sign with how to file a complaint to the State Survey Agency. Findings include: I. Resident group interview The group interview was conducted on 11/2/23 at 12:57 p.m. with three residents (#1, #16 and #31) identified by assessment and the facility as interviewable. All three residents said they did not know they could file a complaint with the State Agency and they did not know where the facility posted information in regard to pertinent State Agencies' contact information. II. Observation and staff interview On 11/2/23 at 1:15 p.m., an observation was conducted throughout the facility. There were no signs in the front lobby of the building and no signs in each of the four units that contained the State Agency contact information. Each unit had an eight by eleven inch white paper posted next to the nurse's station with contact information for other local and State contact information next to the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$79,098 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $79,098 — penalty dated 2023-11-08

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to THE ENSIGN GROUP — 342 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 15 rows in the source record cover these 11 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.8M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CO