Rehabilitation And Nursing Center Of The Rockies

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

56.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 60 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 73.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 74 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.54 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 84% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 22% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 106 beds and averages 87.7 residents a day — about 83% occupied, or roughly 18 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.24 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.51 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.25 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.69 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.47 on weekdays — 23% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.58 to 0.32 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 47% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

21 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 9 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2025-06-26 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY IV. Resident #4 - The facility failed to initiate a thorough investigation of an injury of unknown origin. A. Resident #4 1. Resident status Resident #4, age greater than 65, was admitted on [DATE]. According to the June 2025 CPO, diagnoses included systemic involvement of connective tissue (autoimmune disease), arthritis, edema, and history of stroke. The 6/3/25 MDS assessment revealed Resident #4 was cognitively intact with a BIMS score of 14 out of 15. The resident required total assistance (fully dependent) from the staff for toileting, dressing, bed mobility (the ability to sit up or roll from side to side while lying), and all transfers. The resident required (two-person) extensive assistance from the staff for bathing and personal hygiene. Resident #4 had impairments to her lower extremities and a limited full range of motion. 2. Resident interview Resident #4 was interviewed on 6/25/25 at 4:00 p.m. She said she sustained an injury in the middle of May 2025 when a male CNA she did not know came into her…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2025-06-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure two (#4 and #207) of eight residents reviewed for accident hazards received adequate supervision out of 37 sample residents. Resident #4 was admitted to the facility for long term care on 4/5/24 with diagnoses of systemic involvement of connective tissue (autoimmune disease), arthritis, edema and history of stroke. Resident #4 was identified as cognitively intact and was able to transfer with a sit-to-stand mechanical lift (a lift device used to enhance a resident's dignity and independence by helping residents who can bear weight and participate to transition from a seated to a standing position). Resident #4 said a male certified nurse aide (CNA) transferred her without utilizing the sit-to-stand mechanical lift in May 2025. She said while the CNA was transferring her, they heard a pop. Resident #4 expressed pain and was observed by staff to have bruising, swelling, and redness to her right leg, ankle and foot. The facility…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-23 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure services met professional standards of practice for one (#9) of eight residents out of 13 sample residents.Specifically, the facility failed to:-Ensure nurses did not leave medications on Resident #9's bedside table; -Ensure Resident #9 when he was administered his medications to make sure he swallowed them; and; -Ensure nurses did not document in Resident #9's medication administration record (MAR) that the resident's medications were administered/swallowed when they were not.Findings include:I. Facility policy and procedureThe Medication Administration policy, revised December 2024, was provided by the regional nurse consultant (RNC) on 9/22/25 at 2:47 p.m. The policy revealed medications should be administered as prescribed by the attending physician. Medications may not be set up in advance and must be administered within one hour before or after their prescribed time. The staff administering the medication must record such…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-23 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to maintain medical records in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices for one (#5) of eight residents reviewed for medical record accuracy out of 13 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure accurate documentation of Resident #5's medication administration for Cardura (medication used to treat high blood pressure).Findings include:I. Facility policy and procedureThe Medication Administration Documentation policy and procedure, revised August 2025, was received from the regional nurse consultant (RNC) on 9/23/25 at 1:17 p.m. It read in pertinent part, It is the policy of this facility that medication administration should be documented as per physician order and to reflect if the resident accepted medication administration All current drugs and dosage schedules must be reported on the resident's medication administration record (MAR). Should a drug be withheld, it should be appropriately documented…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-06-26 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide response, action and rationale to residents involved in group grievances. Specifically, the facility failed to effectively address, resolve and follow up with residents on the outcomes and resolutions of grievances expressed. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Grievance policy, reviewed June 2025, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 6/27/25 at 4:42 p.m. It read in pertinent part, The grievance official or designee responds to the individual expressing the concern within three working days of the initial concern to acknowledge receipt and describe steps taken in resolution. II. Resident group interview Four residents (#14, #11, #8 and #54) who regularly attended the resident council meetings were interviewed on 6/25/25 at 9:00 a.m. The residents were identified as alert and oriented by the facility and assessment. The group of residents said the facility did not follow up on grievances brought up in the resident council meetings. Resident #14 said when a grievance came up in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-26 · tag F0555 — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to choose his or her attending physician.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure one (#52) of five residents had the right to choose her own attending physician out of 37 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to allow Resident #52 to choose their primary care provider (PCP) when the resident's previous primary care provider stopped seeing residents. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Resident Rights policy and procedure, revised June 2025, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 6/27/25 at 4:32 p.m. It read in pertinent part, The resident has the right to choose a personal attending physician (and be informed how to contact him or her), to be fully informed in advance about care and treatment, and, unless adjudicated incompetent or otherwise found incapacitated under state law, participate in planning medical treatment. II. Resident #52 A. Resident status Resident #52, age [AGE], was admitted on [DATE]. According to the June 2025 computerized physician orders (CPO),…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-26 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
  Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure two (#207 and #21) of five residents were free from chemical restraints and were receiving the least restrictive approach for their needs out of 37 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Ensure Resident #21's behavior care plan had resident specific behaviors and triggers identified; -Document consistent behaviors for Resident #207 and Resident #21 to justify the continued use of psychotropic medications; and, -Document resident specific care approaches, to include medication specific target behaviors and person-centered interventions, for Resident #207 and Resident #21's psychotropic medications. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Chemical Restraint and Psychotropic Medication Management policy, dated April 2025, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 6/27/25 at 4:42 p.m. It read in pertinent part, The facility's interdisciplinary team (IDT) will review the comprehensive assessment to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-26 · tag F0628 — isolated
  Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide and document sufficient discharge preparation and documentation for one (#99) of three residents reviewed for a safe and orderly discharge out of 37 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure thorough documentation, including physician notification, when Resident #99 and her representative left the facility against medical advice (AMA). Findings include: I. Resident #99 A. Resident status Resident #99, age [AGE], was admitted on [DATE] and left the facility to her representative's home on 4/2/25. According to the April 2025 computerized physician orders (CPO), diagnoses included anxiety, fracture of patella and hypertension. The 4/1/25 minimum data set (MDS) assessment revealed an assessment had not been completed for Resident #99. B. Resident representative interview The resident's representative was interviewed on 6/24/25 at 10:12 a.m. The representative said Resident #99 was admitted to the facility after a fall with a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-26 · tag F0644 — isolated
  Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to incorporate recommendations from the preadmission screening and resident review (PASRR) Level II determination and evaluation from the State Mental Health Agency in the case of residents with serious mental illness or a related condition for one (#21) of five residents reviewed for PASRR out of 37 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to arrange and incorporate recommendations from the PASRR Level II notice of determination (NOD) for Resident #21. Findings include: I. Professional reference The National Center for Biotechnology Information, National Library of Medicine guidance website, dated 5/16/23, retrieved on 7/1/25, from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK513310 read in pertinent part, A neurocognitive assessment, also known as cognitive testing or a neuropsychological evaluation, is a series of tests designed to measure various aspects of brain function. Neuropsychological evaluations require the use of standardized instruments…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-26 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
  Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure one (#78) of five residents reviewed for activities out of 37 sample residents received an ongoing program of activities designed to meet their needs and interests, and promote physical, medical, and psychosocial well-being. Specifically, the facility failed to offer and provide a personalized activity program for Resident #78. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Activities policy and procedure, revised [DATE], was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on [DATE] at 4:32 p.m. It read in pertinent part, It is the policy of this facility to ensure that residents have the right to choose the types of activities and social events in which they wish to participate. II. Resident #78 A. Resident status Resident #78, age [AGE], was admitted on [DATE]. According to the [DATE] computerized physician orders (CPO), diagnoses included dementia with agitation, anxiety disorder and insomnia. The [DATE] minimum data…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-26 · tag F0742 — isolated
  Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with mental disorder or psychosocial adjustment difficulty, or who has a history of trauma and/or post-traumatic stress disorder.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure one (#23) of five residents diagnosed with a mental disorder or psychosocial adjustment difficulty received appropriate treatment and services to attain the highest practicable mental and psychosocial wellbeing out of 37 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to identify Resident #23 had a history of suicidal ideation in order to monitor for worsening signs and symptoms of depression or suicidal ideation. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Suicide Precaution policy and procedure, revised August 2022, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 6/27/25 at 4:32 p.m. It read in pertinent part, If a resident verbalizes an intent to attempt suicide or takes any action that could be interpreted as a suicide attempt, document specific behavior and or statements of the resident, notification of physician and family or responsible party, safety interventions and actions taken. II. Resident #23 A. Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-26 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — isolated
  Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure facility resources were administered in a manner that allowed its resources to be used effectively and efficiently to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident in the facility. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Provide sufficient leadership to address and or avoid multiple concerns; -Prevent, report and fully investigate allegations of abuse timely to provide immediate protections to residents at risk; -Report and investigate an injury of unknown origin in a timely manner so that an accurate timeline of events could be established and the injury could be effectively treated and monitored; and, -Monitor a resident for worsening symptoms of depression who expressed suicidal ideations. Findings include: I. Abuse and neglect During the extended survey from 6/23/25 to 6/26/25, it was identified that there were concerns over the timely reporting of an allegation of abuse so that the resident could be immediately protected from a repeat incident of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$21,721 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $21,721 — penalty dated 2025-06-26

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to THE ENSIGN GROUP — 342 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 13 rows in the source record cover these 9 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $323K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CO