McIntosh Care And Rehabilitation Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Met the expected recovery: 72.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 25 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.21 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 24% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 29% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 110 beds and averages 83.3 residents a day — about 76% occupied, or roughly 27 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.00 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.59 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.86 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.57 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.17 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.61 to 0.53 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 50% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

20 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 8 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2026-03-19 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure one (#88) of three residents reviewed for accidents received adequate supervision out of 38 sample residents. Resident #88 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses cerebral infarction (stroke), acute respiratory failure, atrial fibrillation, pacemaker, osteoarthritis, obesity, hypertension and acute kidney failureOn 12/16/26, Resident #88 was being transported to an appointment in the facility's transportation van. Resident #88's wheelchair was not properly secured in the transportation van. During the transportation, Resident #88's wheelchair slipped and the resident hit her head on the van. The resident was transported to the emergency department (ED) and was admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) for monitoring related to the sustained traumatic subdural hematoma (brain bleed) and Eliquis (blood thinner) use. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure Resident #88 was provided safe transportation. Findings…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Actual harm · Gcited before2022-11-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision and assistance to prevent accidents for 2 (Resident #122 and Resident #224) of 4 sampled residents reviewed for falls/accidents. Specifically, the facility assessed Resident #122 to be at high risk for falls upon admission but did not develop interventions to prevent falls, and on 6/8/2022 (five days after admission to the facility) Resident #122 fell and sustained a fractured hip. Additionally, the facility assessed Resident #224 to require the assistance of two staff for transfers; however, an incident report revealed the resident sustained an injury to the knee during a transfer with the assistance of only one staff person. Findings included: 1. Review of the facility's Fall Prevention Program, dated 2021, revealed, Each resident will be assessed for fall risk and will receive care and services in accordance with their individualized level of risk to minimize the likelihood of falls. The nurse…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-03-19 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to honor resident choices for four (#17, #29, #41, #77) of 12 residents reviewed out of 38 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure Resident #17, Resident #29, Resident #41 and Resident #77 received showers consistently according to the resident's choices and plan of care. Findings include:I. Facility policy and procedureThe Resident Showers policy, revised April 2025, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 3/19/26 at 11:23 a.m. The policy read in pertinent part: It is the practice of this facility to assist residents with bathing to maintain proper hygiene, stimulate circulation and help prevent skin issues as per current stands of practice. Residents will be provided showers as per request or as per facility schedule protocols and based upon resident safety. Partial baths may be given between regular shower schedules as per facility policy.II. Resident #17A. Resident statusResident #17, age [AGE], was admitted on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-19 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interviews, the facility failed to provide a clean, comfortable and homelike environment for resident rooms on two of four units. Specifically, the facility failed to provide clean linen hand towels and washcloths on a daily basis. Findings include:I. Facility policy and procedureThe Safe and Homelike Environment policy and procedure, reviewed January 2026, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 3/19/26 at 1:13 p.m. It read in pertinent part, The facility will create and maintain, to the extent possible, a homelike environment that de-emphasizes the institutional character of the setting. The facility will provide and maintain bed and bath linens that are clean and in good condition.II. ObservationsAn initial tour was conducted on 3/16/26 from 8:30 a.m. to 9:30 a.m. The following was observed:Resident rooms #306, #318, #406, #407, #410, #412 did not have linen towels or washcloths in the rooms.A tour was conducted on 3/17/26 from 8:00 to 8:15 a.m. and the following was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-19 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that all drugs and biologicals were properly stored, secured, and labeled in accordance with accepted professional standards for one of the two medication carts. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure there were no loose pills in the medication cart. Findings include:I. Facility policy and procedureThe Medication Storage policy, dated 3/18/26, was received from the director of nursing (DON) on 3/18/26 at 8:42 p.m. It revealed in pertinent part, Medication carts should be kept clean and organized. Dropped, loose, refused, or unused medications should not be placed in the red biohazard/sharps containers, in the trash, or put down the drain per (State) regulations or taped back into prescription cards. These medications should be placed in the drug buster. Medications and biologicals are stored properly, following the manufacturer's or provider pharmacy recommendations, to maintain their integrity and to support safe, effective drug administration.II. ObservationsOn 3/17/26 at 11:15 a.m., the three hundred north…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-19 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — pattern
  Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure meals were served according to the resident's preferences on three of four units.Specifically, the facility failed to provide menus to residents in order for the residents to choose their meals and honor food preferences. Findings include:I. Facility policy and procedureThe Dietary Services for Food Preferences policy and procedure, reviewed January 2026, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 3/19/26 at 1:13 p.m. It read in pertinent part: Food preferences, allergies and intolerances should be noted on the dietary ticket, also note cultural, ethnic, and religious preferences resident requests. Record of these preferences, allergies and intolerances on the resident's tray card and note in care plan/Kardex (staff directive tool) or electronic medical record (EMR). Preferences to be updated as notified. It is important that these preferences, allergies, and intolerances be honored on the service line and that appropriate substitutions are made when there is a dislike. Nursing…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-03-19 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
  Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for residents, staff, and the public.Specifically, the facility failed to ensure the laundry area and three soiled utility rooms were free from multiple environmental concerns. Findings include:I. ObservationsOn 3/17/26 at 11:15 a.m., the soiled utility room (in the laundry area) and the laundry were observed with the laundry aid. The solid utility room had a deep, large area of multiple layers of floor linoleum tile, cut out with eight tiles missing. There was a pile of dirt and debris along the base tiles behind the entrance door. The sheetrock was torn along the walls. There were areas of torn sheet rock without texture or paint.The laundry aide said that the lint traps were cleaned every two hours. There was dust built up behind the dryer near the vent pipe. There was peeling sheetrock outside the dirty utility room along the wall. There were missing cover-base tiles, approximately three feet.There was torn linoleum on the floor near the stand-alone…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-19 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to maintain accurate medical records for advance directives on each resident for one (#29) of six residents reviewed out of 38 sample residents. Specially, the facility failed to ensure Resident #29's medical orders for scope of treatment (MOST) form corresponded with the computerized physician orders (CPO) for no cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). Findings include:I. Facility policy and procedureThe Advanced Directive and Associated Documentation policy and procedure, reviewed [DATE], was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on [DATE] at 1:13 p.m. It read in pertinent part, It is the policy of this facility that a resident's choice about advance directives will be recognized and respected. Advance care planning will occur periodically (at least quarterly, annually and on the change of condition) to review the advance directive and/or preferences regarding treatment options with the resident or their representative to ensure that they are…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-19 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to properly store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety.Specifically, the facility failed to ensure the facility's one dishwashing room was maintained and repaired in a timely manner. Findings include:I. Professional referenceAccording to the Colorado Retail Food Establishment Regulations, (3/16/24), were retrieved on 3/26/26. The regulations revealed in pertinent part, physical facilities should be maintained in good repair. Physical facilities should be cleaned as often as necessary to keep them clean. Intake and exhaust air ducts should be cleaned and filters changed so they are not a source of contamination by dust, dirt, and other materials. (Chapter 6)II. Facility policy and procedureThe Safe and Homelike Environment policy, revised 10/1/24, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 3/19/26 at 4:45 p.m. The policy revealed the facility would provide housekeeping and maintenance services as necessary to maintain a sanitary, orderly and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-26 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure resident rights were promoted and dignity was maintained for one (#1) of three residents out of five sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure Resident #1's care was provided in a dignified and respectful manner by certified nurse aide (CNA) #1. Findings include: I. Resident #1 A. Resident status Resident #1, age greater than 65, was admitted on [DATE]. According to the November 2024 computerized physician orders (CPO), diagnoses included epilepsy (seizure disorder), bipolar disorder (mental disorder that causes unusual shifts in behaviors), low back pain and muscle weakness. The 9/12/24 minimum data set (MDS) assessment revealed the resident was cognitively intact with a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15. She was dependent on one staff member's assistance with toileting hygiene. She required substantial/maximal assistance for putting on/taking off footwear. She required partial/moderate…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-15 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary and comfortable environment for residents, staff and the public in two of three units. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Keep space heaters in areas deemed safe; -Maintain comfortable room temperature; -Remove exposed wires when equipment was removed; -Keep ceiling panels closed in residential areas; -Maintain flooring condition without tripping hazards in the dining area, and, -Keep emergency water sprinklers uncovered. Findings include: I. Maintain comfortable temperature and space heater On 2/12/24 at 11:30 a.m. room [ROOM NUMBER] had a black tall heater positioned between dressed and bedside commode. The resident in room [ROOM NUMBER] was interviewed on 2/12/24 at 11:14 a.m. She said it was cold every day. room [ROOM NUMBER] was observed on 2/12/24 at 1:23 p.m. There was a tall space heater in the semi-private room that was placed in the middle of the room. It was next to the privacy curtain that…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-02-15 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — pattern
  Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to have a registered nurse (RN) scheduled eight hours consecutively a day for seven days a week. Specifically, the facility failed to have an RN on duty for eight consecutive hours on a consistent basis from 11/1/23 to 2/5/24. Findings include: I. Record review Review of the nursing schedule from 11/1/23 to 2/5/24 revealed the following: -In November 2023, the facility did not have an RN on duty for eight consecutive hours on seven days during the month; -In December 2023, the facility did not have an RN on duty for eight consecutive hours on seven days during the month; -In January 2024, the facility did not have an RN on duty for eight consecutive hours on four days during the month; and, -In February 2024, from 2/1/24 to 2/5/24, the facility did not have an RN on duty for eight consecutive hours for one day. II. Staff interview The director of nursing (DON) was interviewed on 2/15/24 at approximately 10:20 a.m. The DON said it had been a challenge to hire RNs to fill their vacant positions therefore the facility had been…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$14,015 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $14,015 — penalty dated 2026-03-19

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to THE ENSIGN GROUP — 342 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 15 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 85% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CO