Lakeshore Post Acute And Rehabilitation Center
2701 California St, Pueblo, CO 81004 · For profit - Corporation · 106 certified beds · (719) 561-1300 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Oct 2023
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
- a high number of inspection citations overall (30) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 3 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 9.5% | 13.4% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 11.3% | 4.7% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.3% | 0.6% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.0% | 1.4% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 4.9% | 8.8% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 4.0% | 3.4% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 9.6% | 13.3% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 11.5% | 11.5% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 94.7% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 2.4% | 3.4% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 27.6% | 21.2% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 14.9% | 20.0% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.6% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 85.5% | 75.6% | 79.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 27.8% | 20.3% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 3.1% | 12.1% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.77 | 1.38 | 1.67 | typical |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.78 | 1.74 | 1.80 | better |
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
48.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 30 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 80.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 20 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.30 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 49% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 21% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 48.3%CMS range 35.0–67.3 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.1%CMS range 7.1–16.8 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 80.0% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 65.0% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 35.0% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 7.4% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.10 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 106 beds and averages 81.1 residents a day — about 77% occupied, or roughly 25 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.38 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.73 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.07 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.99 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.54 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.83 to 0.49 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 44% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
30 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 20 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · E2025-08-28 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary and comfortable environment for residents, staff and the public. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure resident rooms, shower rooms and hallways received necessary maintenance and repairs. Findings include:I. Observations On 8/26/25 at 10:20 a.m., observations of the facility revealed the following:In the shower room on the A hall, it was revealed that there was a missing vent, leaving a hole in the ceiling.-The ventilation system in the A Hall shower room was not working The vents on the A hall and B hall were rusty with a brown colored substance around the surfaces, and the vents were missing paint.A hole was observed in the drywall of room F-4.On Hall C, room [ROOM NUMBER] had water leaking from the ventilation system located on the ceiling towards the window in the room.On 8/27/25 at 11:15 a.m., observations of the facility revealed the following:Near the door going into the main dining room, there was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-28 · tag F0628 — isolatedProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide and document sufficient discharge preparation and documentation for one (#97) of two residents reviewed for a safe and orderly discharge out of 55 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to notify the ombudsman in writing regarding Resident #97's discharge. Findings include:I. Resident #97A. Resident statusResident #97, age less than 65, was admitted on [DATE] and discharged home on 6/18/25. According to the August 2025 computerized physician orders (CPO), diagnoses included fracture of right lower leg, asthma, type 2 diabetes mellitus and fibromyalgia (pain disorder).The 6/4/25 minimum data set (MDS) assessment revealed the resident was cognitively intact with a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 14 out of 15. She required set-up assistance with eating, substantial to maximum assistance from staff with personal hygiene, and toileting. The MDS assessment documented Resident #97 was discharged from the facility, as…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-28 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolatedProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide ongoing group activities designed to support the needs and preferences of the residents for two (#2 and #78) of five residents reviewed for activities out of 55 sample residents.Specifically, the facility failed to provide activities that met Resident #2 and Resident #78's preferences. Findings include:I. Facility policy and procedureThe Activity policy and procedure, revised September 2024, was received from the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 8/28/25 at 4:20 pm. It read in pertinent part, It is the policy of this facility to ensure that residents have the right to choose the types of activities and social events in which they wish to participate. Residents are encouraged to choose the types of activities and social events in which they prefer to participate. Residents who wish to meet with or participate in social or religious activities, or other community activities, at or away from the facility are encouraged to do…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-28 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure one (#1) of two residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice out of 55 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure timely follow-up from a telehealth (virtual) pulmonology appointment to ensure Resident #1 was evaluated through a sleep study for a potential continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) machine.Findings include:I. Resident #1A. Resident statusResident #1, age less than 65, was admitted on [DATE]. According to the August 2025 computerized physicians orders (CPO), diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, morbid obesity with alveolar hypoventilation (inability to breathe rapidly or deeply), acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypercapnia (too much carbon dioxide in the blood), acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia (low levels of oxygen in the body tissues) and sleep apnea (sleep disorder in which breathing repeatedly stops and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-28 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide proper contracture management services, equipment, and assistance for two (#66 and #37) of three residents reviewed for restorative services out of 55 sample residents. Specifically the facility failed to:-Ensure staff consistently applied Resident #66's wrist splint to the resident's right hand, which had a contracture (a permanent tightening of the muscles, tendons, skin, and nearby tissues that causes the joints to shorten and become very stiff); and,-Ensure Resident #37 was provided with passive range of motion (PROM) to her bilateral ankles, which had contractures.Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Contracture policy, dated 2022, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 8/26/25 at 4:20 p.m. It revealed in pertinent part, A resident with a limited range of motion or contracture shall receive appropriate treatment and services, based on the comprehensive assessment of the resident, to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-28 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure an environment free from risk of accident hazards for one (#5) of two residents out of 55 sample residents.Specifically, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision for Resident #5, who had a history of elopement. Findings include:I. Facility policy and procedureThe Elopement policy and procedure, revised September 2024, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 8/28/25 at 9:47 a.m. It read in pertinent part, It is the policy of this facility to ensure that the facility provides a safe and secure atmosphere for all residents in the facility while striving to maintain the highest practicable function and the least restrictive environment. To ensure that residents at risk for elopement are properly monitored. Residents who are at risk for elopement would have an appropriate plan of care developed to address the risk.II. Resident #5A. Resident statusResident #5, age greater than 65, was admitted on [DATE].…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-28 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate was not greater than five percent (%).Specifically, the facility's medication error rate was 10.3%, or three errors out of 29 opportunities for error.Findings include:I. Facility policy and procedureThe Subcutaneous Insulin Medication Administration policy, dated January 2022, was provided by the NHA on 8/28/25 at 9:47 a.m. It read in pertinent part, Prepare syringe/pen and safety needle. Line up the needle with the pen, and keep it straight as you attach it. Always perform the safety test before each injection. Performing the safety test ensures that you get an accurate dose by ensuring that pen and needle work properly and removing air bubbles. Select the priming dose by turning the dosage selector. Hold the pen with the needle pointing upwards. Tap the insulin reservoir so that any air bubbles rise up towards the needle. Press the injection button all the way in. Check if insulin comes out of the needle tip.The Medication Administration policy, revised August 2024, was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-28 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interviews, the facility failed to ensure one (#99) of six residents out of 55 sample residents were free from significant medication errors.Specifically, the facility failed to ensure the insulin pen was primed in a manner consistent with professional standards of practice prior to medication administration for Resident #99. Findings include:I. Facility policy and procedureThe Subcutaneous Insulin Medication Administration policy, dated January 2022, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 8/28/25 at 9:47 a.m. It read in pertinent part, Prepare syringe/pen and safety needle. Line up the needle with the pen, and keep it straight as you attach it. Always perform the safety test before each injection. Performing the safety test ensures that you get an accurate dose by ensuring that pen and needle work properly and removing air bubbles. Select the priming dose by turning the dosage selector. Hold the pen with the needle pointing upwards. Tap the insulin reservoir so that any…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-28 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure all drugs and biologicals were properly stored, secured, and labeled in accordance with accepted professional standards in two of three medication carts and one of one medication storage rooms.Specifically, the facility failed to:-Ensure medications for discharged residents were stored in a secure manner; and,-Ensure residents' medications were labeled and dated appropriately with the resident's name and the date the medication was opened.Findings include:I. ObservationsOn 8/28/25 at 3:15 p.m. the facility's one medication storage room was observed with the regional clinical resource (RCR) and registered nurse (RN) #1. There were multiple bubble packs of medications sitting out on the counter. The medications belonged to Resident #9 and Resident #31.On 8/28/25 at 3:25 p.m. the medication cart in hallway D was observed with licensed practical nurse (LPN) #3. The following items were found:-There were two fluticasone propionate 50 micrograms (mcg) nasal spray bottles stored in appropriately labeled…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-28 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to maintain an infection control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment to help prevent the development and transmission of disease and infection on one of six units.Specifically, the facility failed to:-Ensure Resident #99's glucometer was cleaned according to manufacturer recommendations; and,-Ensure proper hand hygiene was conducted during medication administration. Findings include:I. Failure to clean the glucometer according to manufacturer recommendationsA. Cleaning and disinfecting guidelinesThe Assure glucometer manufacturer cleaning and disinfecting guidelines were provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 8/28/25 at 9:47 a.m. It read in pertinent part, We suggest cleaning and disinfecting the meter between patient use. Cleaning and disinfecting can be completed by using a commercially-available EPA-registered (tested, approved and registered by the United States Environmental Protection Agency) disinfectant detergent or germicide wipe. To use a wipe, remove from the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 20 citations
- Potential for harm · E2025-02-26 · tag F0655 — patternCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews the facility failed to develop and implement a baseline care plan that included the instructions needed to provide effective and person-centered care for three (#3, #11 and #14) of four residents reviewed for baseline care plans out of 22 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure pertinent medical information was included on Resident #3, Resident #11 and Resident #14's baseline care plans within 48 hours of admission. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Comprehensive Person-Centered Care Planning, revised January 2022, was received from the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 2/26/25 at 5:08 p.m. It read in pertinent part, The interdisciplinary team (IDT) will develop and implement a baseline care plan for each resident, within 48 hours of admission, that includes minimum healthcare information necessary to properly care for each resident and instructions needed to provide effective and person-centered care that meet professional…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-26 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — patternProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide an ongoing program to support residents in their choice activities, designed to meet the interests of and support the physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident, encouraging both independence and interaction in the community for three (#10, #6, and #4) of three residents reviewed for activities programming out of 22 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to offer and provide personalized activity programs for Resident #10, #6 and #4. Findings include: I. Activity calendar The February 2025 activity calendar for the week of 2/23/25 through 2/28/25 revealed there were seven to eight activities scheduled per day. The activity calendar had mind-stimulating activities scheduled on four of seven days for the week (2/23/25, 2/24/25, 2/25/25 and 2/26/25) in the form of Bingo. There was only one activity scheduled for the week for non-social dementia residents in the form of Puppy Friday (2/28/25).…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-10-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure food was stored, prepared, and served under sanitary conditions in one kitchen. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure: -Foods of modified consistency were reheated to safe temperatures following the use of a multi-step preparation process; -Cutting boards were free from deep scratches and stains; and, -Beard restraints were worn in kitchen areas while serving food. Findings include: I. Food temperatures A. Professional reference According to the United States Public Health Service Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 2022 Food Code 3-403.11 (A) pg. 36 Time/Temperature Control for Safety Food (TCS) that is cooked, cooled, and reheated for hot holding shall be reheated so that all parts of the food reach a temperature of at least 74 degrees C (165 degrees F) for 15 seconds. B. Observations and staff interview On 10/25/23 at 9:55 a.m. the cook (CK) had prepared the pork that was from the oven and placed it in a large metal container. The CK poured a large bottle of barbeque into the pan of pork…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-10-26 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — patternHonor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide response, action and rationale to residents involved in group grievances. Specifically, the facility failed to effectively address, resolve and demonstrate the facility's response to grievances concerning resident care and dignity. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Resident Council policy, revised February 2021, was provided by the corporate nurse consultant (CN) on 10/25/23. It read in pertinent part, The purpose of the resident council is to provide a forum for discussion of concerns and suggestions for improvement. A resident council response form will be utilized to track issues and their resolutions. The facility department related to any issues will be responsible to address the item(s) of concern. II. Resident interview The resident council president, Resident #23, was interviewed on 10/26/23 at 10:19 a.m. She stated she did not know who was supposed to handle the grievances brought up in the council meeting. The council did not receive a resolution for grievances brought up in prior…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-10-26 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to maintain a sanitary, orderly and comfortable environment for residents in 14 of 60 resident rooms in six hallways. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure walls, baseboards and doors were properly maintained. Findings include: I. Initial observations Observations of the resident living environment were conducted on 10/24/23 at 1:24 p.m. revealed: Room #C-21: The resident's sink had a one inch ring of rust around the drain. The wall next to the resident's bed had deep scratches from the bed being lifted and lowered. The vent on the ceiling had peeling and chipped sheetrock approximately two inches around the whole vent. The wood railing outside of C hall had chipped and splintering corners approximately three inches long and a half inch wide. The sheet rock was chipped and peeling with metal corners exposed. The nursing station had swinging doors that were removed. The area where the door hinges were located had chipped and damaged sheet rock approximately five inches long by four inch wide. The corner had chipped…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-10-26 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — patternImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure five (#13, #38, #3, #23 and #52) of eight residents were free from unnecessary psychotropic medications out of 32 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Monitor targeted behaviors and individualized non-pharmacological approaches for psychotropic medications for Residents #13, #38 and #3; -Follow pharmacist recommendations for gradual dose reductions of psychoactive medications for Resident #3 and #23; -Ensure risks were reviewed for an antipsychotic medication prior to administration for Resident #3; and, -Ensure as-needed (PRN) orders for psychotropic/antipsychotic medication did not extend 14 days without documented clinical rationale from the physician or a physician evaluation of the resident for Residents #52 and #23. Findings include: I. Facility policy The Behavior Monitoring policy dated 3/10/23, was provided by the corporate nurse consultant (CN) on 10/25/23 at 3:36 p.m. It read in pertinent part: The purpose of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections such as COVID-19 for three of six units Specifically, the facility failed to ensure: -Staff performed hand hygiene between glove use; -Staff wore personal protective equipment (PPE) when entering COVID positive rooms; -Staff doffed (removed) gowns prior to exiting a COVID positive room; and, -A COVID positive resident did not occupy areas frequented by COVID negative residents. Findings include: I Professional reference According to the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) guidance, Use Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) When Caring for Patients with Confirmed or Suspected COVID-19, dated 6/3/2020, retrieved on 11/2/23 from https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/downloads/A_FS_HCP_COVID19_PPE.pdf. It read in pertinent part, -PPE must be donned correctly before entering the patient area. -PPE must remain in place and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-10-26 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — patternEnsure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure in-service training for certified nurse aides (CNAs) consisted of annual training for dementia management for six of six CNAs reviewed. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure CNAs #3, #4, #5 #6, #1 and #2 received annual dementia management training. I. Training review Six nurse aides were reviewed for the annual required dementia management training. Training records revealed six of the six did not have the required annual training: CNA #3 was hired on 7/7/22. She had not had annual dementia management training. CNA #4 was hired on 1/21/21. She had not had annual dementia management training. CNA #5 was hired on 10/27/22. She had not had annual dementia management training. CNA #6 was hired on 8/31/21. She had not had annual dementia management training. CNA #1 was hired on 8/23/22. She had not had annual dementia management training. CNA #2 was hired on 1/12/22. She had not had annual dementia management training. II. Interview The director of nursing (DON) was interviewed 10/25/23 at 4:35 p.m.She said the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-26 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure two (#31 and #55) out of four residents reviewed for abuse were kept free from abuse out of 32 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Prevent a resident-to-resident altercations between Resident #58 and #55; and. -Prevent a resident-to-resident altercation between Resident #58 and #31. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Abuse policy, dated 5/3/23, was provided by the director of nursing (DON) on 10/23/23 at 4:28 p.m., included in part, Abuse is defined as the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain, mental anguish, deprivation of goods or services that are necessary to attain or maintain physical, mental, or psychosocial well-being. Willful means the individual must have acted deliberately, not that the individual must have intended to inflict injury or harm. II. Resident #58 A. Resident status Resident #58, age [AGE], was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-26 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolatedEnsure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from physical restraints imposed for purposes of convenience, and the least restrictive alternatives were used for two (#52 and #11) of three residents reviewed for restraints out of 32 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Obtain a physician's order for a lap buddy for Resident #52 and #11; -Obtain consent before the use of a lap buddy for Resident #52 and #11; and, -Evaluate the ongoing use of a lap buddy for Resident #52 and #11. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Restraint Free Environment policy, implemented 12/1/22, was provided by the director of nursing (DON) on 10/25/23 at 3:10 p.m. included: Policy: It is the policy of this facility that each resident shall attain and maintain his/her highest practicable well-being in an environment that prohibits the use of restraints for discipline or convenience and limits restraint use to circumstances in which the resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-26 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to report alleged violations of potential abuse administration in accordance with State law involving one resident (#54) of four residents reviewed for abuse out of 32 sample residents. Specifically, a certified nurse aide failed to report verbal abuse immediately that she witnessed to facility administration by a nurse towards Resident #54. She documented it on a concern form and failed to take further action. Findings include: I. Facility investigation Review of the incident report on 4/30/23 revealed a certified nurse aide (CNA) #10 reported on a concern form that a nurse was verbally abusive toward a resident. 4/29/23 Concern form: (CNA) reported to the RN that the resident did not want to take a shower and (the CNA) asked for help. (The RN) threw the blankets off of him and told him you are getting in the shower. She continued to tell him that he needed to lose weight because he looked pregnant, making fun of him for the way his pants and underwear looked stating that he looked like he was wearing maternity pants.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-26 · tag F0659 — isolatedProvide care by qualified persons according to each resident's written plan of care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to provide services by qualified persons for one (#71) out of 32 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure Residents #71 was assessed by a registered nurse (RN) following a fall. Findings include: I. Resident status Resident #71, age [AGE], was admitted on [DATE]. According to the October 2023 computerized physician orders (CPO), diagnoses included atrioventricular block, atrial fibrillation, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), urinary tract infection and kidney failure. According to the 7/31/22 minimum data set (MDS) assessment, the resident had no cognitive impairment with a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 14 out of 15. The resident had no behavioral symptoms. He required extensive assistance for bed mobility, transfers, grooming and toilet use. The resident had no falls since admission. II. Record review The care plan, initiated 5/4/23 and revised 10/19/23, identified the resident was at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-26 · tag F0685 — isolatedAssist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews the facility failed to provide hearing assistive devices to residents for one (#22) of three residents reviewed for hearing devices out of 32 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure the availability and education with staff on the use of hearing aides as ordered for Resident #22. Findings include: I. Resident #22 A. Resident status Resident #22, age over 65, was admitted on [DATE] and readmitted [DATE]. According to the October 2023 computerized physicians orders (CPO), diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease, vertigo and bilateral (both ears) hearing loss. The 8/22/23 minimum data set (MDS) assessment revealed the resident's cognitive status was severely impaired with a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of one out of 15. She had the identified behaviors of wandering during the assessment period. The assessment identified the use of hearing aides. B. Observations The resident was observed on 10/23/23 at 11:10 a.m. without…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the resident environment remained as free of accident hazards as possible; and each resident received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for one (#58) of three residents reviewed for accidents/hazards out of 32 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure Resident #58 identified as a fall risk wore non-skid footwear while ambulating as identified in the care plan. Findings include: I. Resident #58 A. Resident status Resident #58, age [AGE], was admitted on [DATE]. According to the October 2023 computerized physicians orders (CPO), diagnoses included dementia, cognitive deficit and muscle weakness. The 7/28/23 minimum data set (MDS) assessment revealed the resident's cognitive status was severely impaired with a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of one out of 15. The resident needed the assistance of one person for dressing. No falls were identified on the assessment. B.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-26 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident observations, record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents received proper respiratory treatment and care for one (#183) of three residents reviewed for supplemental oxygen use out of 32 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to administer oxygen in accordance with the physician's order for Resident #183. Findings include: I. Facility policy The Oxygen Administration Policy, revised 4/14/23, was provided on 10/25/23 at 1:55 p.m. by the nursing home administrator (NHA). It read in pertinent part, Oxygen is administered and stored to residents who need it, consistent with professional standards of practice, comprehensive person centered care plans, and the resident's goal and preferences. II. Resident #183 A. Resident status Resident #183, age [AGE], was admitted on [DATE]. According to the October 2023 computerized physician orders (CPO), diagnoses included chronic respiratory failure, venous insufficiency and psychophysiology insomnia. According to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-26 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolatedProvide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents who were diagnosed with Alzheimer's/dementia received the appropriate treatment and services to attain or maintain their highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for one (#58) out of four residents reviewed for mood and behavior out of 32 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Develop a person centered individualized care plan with effective interventions for Resident #58; and, -Train staff on individualized person centered interventions for aggressive behaviors for Resident #58. Findings include: I. Resident #58 A. Resident status Resident #58, age [AGE], was admitted on [DATE]. According to the October 2023 computerized physicians orders (CPO), diagnoses included dementia, cognitive deficit and muscle weakness. The 7/28/23 minimum data set (MDS) assessment revealed the resident's cognitive status was severely impaired with a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of one out of 15.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-07-07 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a call light was within the reach of one (Resident #40) of one sampled resident who was reviewed for accommodation of needs. Findings included: A review of Resident #40's admission Record revealed the facility admitted the resident with diagnoses of anxiety, contracture of left hand, contracture of left ankle, contracture of left foot, bladder disorder, cerebral infarction, and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction. A review of a quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 05/25/2022, revealed the resident scored 13 on a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), indicating the resident was cognitively intact. The resident required extensive assistance of two or more people with bed mobility, transfers, locomotion, dressing, and toilet use. The MDS further indicated the resident had functional limitation in range of motion, with impairment to one upper extremity and one lower extremity. Per the MDS, the resident was frequently incontinent of bladder and always incontinent of bowel. A review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-07-07 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure notification of a facility-initiated transfer, including the reason for the transfer, was provided to the resident/representative for 1 (Resident #5) of 1 sampled resident reviewed for transfer notice requirements. Findings included: Review of a facility policy titled, Transfer and Discharge (including AMA-against medical advice), dated 10/01/2022 (sic), revealed, It is the policy of this facility to permit each resident to remain in the facility, and not transfer or discharge the resident from the facility except in limited situations when the health and safety of the individual or other residents are endangered. The policy also indicated, Provide transfer notice as soon as practicable to resident and representative. k. Social Services Director, or designee, shall provide notice of transfer to a representative of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman via monthly list. A review of Resident #5's admission Record revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-07-07 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident/resident representative was provided with information regarding the facility's bed-hold and reserve bed payment policy upon transfer to a hospital for 1 (Resident #5) of 1 sampled resident reviewed for transfer requirements. Findings included: A review of the facility's Bed Hold Policy, revised September 2021, revealed, Upon request, Facility shall hold Resident's bed when Resident is away from Facility for medical leave or on therapeutic leave, as long as applicable bed-hold fee, if any, is paid. Except as provided below, the daily bed-hold fee is the current daily charge for the Resident's room and board. Medicaid will pay appliable bed-hold charges for up to 42 days of therapeutic leave only. If a Medicaid resident is on medical leave or exceeds 42 days of therapeutic leave in a single year, the facility may charge the Resident a bed-hold fee not to exceed the Medicaid daily rate minus $2.00. However, no…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-07-07 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to maintain a medication error rate of less than 5%. During medication administration observations, there were three medication errors out of 34 opportunities, which resulted in an 8.82% medication error rate for 2 (Resident #3 and Resident #13) of four residents observed during medication administration. Findings included: Review of a facility policy titled, Medication Administration, dated 10/01/2022, revealed, Medications are administered by licensed nurses, or other staff who are legally authorized to do so in this state, as ordered by the physician and in accordance with professional standards of practice, in a manner to prevent contamination or infection. 1. A review of an admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #13 on 03/19/2019 with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) with acute exacerbation, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, and schizophrenia. A review of a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to THE ENSIGN GROUP — 342 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 4 of 5 | 3.2 | +0.8 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 3 of 5 | 2.8 | +0.2 vs chain |
| Staffing | 3 of 5 | 2.7 | +0.3 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 4.4 | +0.6 vs chain |
The other 341 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.2★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 341; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| MALONEY, ANN | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 06/21/2025 |
| REDDY, VIKAS | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 09/01/2024 |
| JORGENSEN, DAVID | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 05/24/2024 |
| BURNAM, SOON | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 05/24/2024 |
| DUNYON, DAVID | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 05/24/2024 |
| KEETCH, CHAD | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 03/01/2011 |
| SATO, AMI | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 09/09/2024 |
| PRIME TIME HEALTHCARE LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 09/01/2024 |
| PORT, BARRY | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | since 06/21/2025 |
| ENSIGN SERVICES INC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 09/01/2024 |
| SMV PUEBLO LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 09/01/2024 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 15 rows in the source record cover these 11 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 89% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in CO
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Colorado Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 065229. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-08-28, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.