No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Ventura Health And Rehabilitation Center

7900 Venture Center Way, Boynton Beach, FL 33437 · For profit - Corporation · 99 certified beds · (561) 736-6000 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (561) 736-6000 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)2 actual-harm citations
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (22% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
Worth asking about
  • it has 2 actual-harm citations
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (38) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • about 30% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Urgent care / clinic
10151 Enterprise Center Blvd · (561) 405-3000 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
10201 Hagen Ranch Rd · (561) 536-0262 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
7395 W Boynton Beach Blvd · (561) 327-6270 · Call to confirm hours
Park
8802 Boynton Beach Blvd · (561) 966-7094 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased12.6%8.7%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight11.2%5.5%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.3%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.4%0.7%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.4%4.6%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury4.1%2.5%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened24.4%9.5%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication4.1%14.4%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%99.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers4.8%4.5%4.7%typical
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control9.7%10.5%21.2%typical for the state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table14.3%8.6%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication3.3%1.5%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine97.8%94.7%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission20.8%26.1%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit4.6%9.1%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days3.252.131.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.471.151.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

46.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 222 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

46.2%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
13.3%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
70.2%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.55U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.20hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.23hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.11hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 70.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 131 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.55 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 85% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 13% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF46.2%CMS range 39.0–51.951.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF13.3%CMS range 10.3–16.510.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge70.2%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge58.0%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge66.4%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified99.5%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting96.6%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened3.9%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization8.2%CMS range 5.1–11.17.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.251.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

1.00
RN hours/ resident / day
0.51
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.05
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.56
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.71
RN hoursweekends
22.1%
Total nursing turnover
26.1%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 99 beds and averages 91.4 residents a day — about 92% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.56 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.00 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.05 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.15 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.72 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.12 to 0.71 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 22% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

13
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-04-30)
10
at the previous standard inspection (2024-01-11)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

38 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 26 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2022-08-25 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide treatment and services necessary to maintain or improve dining-eating and to prevent significant weight loss for 2 of 8 sampled residents reviewed for nutrition (Resident #43 and #128); and failed to provide the necessary services to maintain good nutrition and prevent weight loss for 1 of 2 sampled residents (Resident #15) who required total assistance with eating. The findings included: 1. During the observation of Resident #43 on 08/22/22 at 11:00 AM, it was noted the resident to be lying in bed, appeared malnourished and underweight, and had cognition deficit. A subsequent observation of Resident #43, during the 08/22/23 lunch meal in the main dining room at 12:30 PM, noted the resident to be only eating dessert and no intake of the main meal. Continued observation noted at no time did the 3 nursing staff working in the main dining room offer assistance to the resident to eat or give supervision to encourage eating all meal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2022-08-25 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review and policy review, the facility failed to provide pain medication associated with wound care for 1 of 2 sampled residents (Resident #223). The findings included: The facility's policy, titled, Negative Pressure Wound Therapy, implemented 11/2020, revealed, in part, Monitoring throughout the use of NPWT (negative pressure wound therapy) shall include, but is not limited to, the following: a. Pain associated with the therapy. On 08/16/22, Resident #223 was admitted to the facility from an acute care facility. On 08/22/22 at 10:30 AM, the resident was observed in her bed with her eyes closed. This surveyor attempted to have a conversation with the resident, but she was confused and unable to speak. A review of the nursing progress note, dated 08/16/22, revealed, Resident Alert, disoriented, and cannot follow simple directions. Resident is not clear in speech, unable to communicate. The resident's medical diagnoses at the time of admission included Sepsis, Pressure Ulcer Sacrum Stage 4, Chronic Atrial Fibrillation and Personal history of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-04-30 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to provide food that meet the residents' nutritional needs, for 5 of 5 sampled residents that has the potential to affect 29 residents on Fortified foods observed during lunch; failed to follow the approved menu for lunch on 04/27/25 that has the potential to affect 93 residents who eat orally, Resident #53, Resident #25, Resident #40, Resident #13, and Resident #61; and failed to provide foods that meet the residents' needs or preferences, for 7 of 7 sampled residents observed during dining, Resident #18, Resident #65, Resident #67, Resident #64, Resident #15, and Resident #68. The findings included: 1. Record review showed Resident #53 was admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnosis of hereditary and idiopathic neuropathy and incisional hernia without obstruction or gangrene. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment discharge return anticipated dated 02/25/25 revealed the Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-30 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate care services and reasonable accommodations for 2 of 2 sampled residents as evidenced by the failure to keep the call light within reach of Resident #66 and failure to ensure the call light was secured and within reach of Resident #12. The findings included: 1. Review of the policy, titled, Call Lights: Accessibility and Timely Response, implemented 11/2020 and revised 07/19/22, documented, in part, 1. Staff will ensure the call light is within reach of residents and secured, as needed. 2. The call bell will be accessible to residents while in their bed or other sleeping accommodation within the resident's room. Record review revealed Resident #66 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the current Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documented Resident #66 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, on a 0-15 scale, indicating the resident was cognitively intact. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-30 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to provide personal hygiene as part of Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) and failed to accurately identify a resident's personal hygiene kit for 1 of 2 sampled residents, Resident #62. The findings included: Record review of the provided document titled, Job Description, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA), with an effective date of 04/20, revealed the following: provide personal care (i.e. grooming, bathing, dressing, oral care etc.) of residents daily and as needed; strong attention to detail and accuracy; excellent organizational skills with ability to prioritize, coordinate and simultaneously maintain multiple projects with high level of quality and productivity. Record review documented Resident #62 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Spondylolisthesis, Major Depressive Disorder, Essential Primary Hypertension, and Myocardial Infarction. Review of annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE],…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-30 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to follow the physician ordered blood pressure (BP) parameters for one of 5 sampled residents, for Resident #52; and failed to meet the professional standards of medication administration via enteral tubing for 1 of 2 sampled residents, Resident #52; and failed to administer the medications timely for 1 of 5 sampled residents for Resident #52. The findings included: Record review of the provided document, titled, Medication Administration, with a revision date of 10/23, revealed that medications are administered by licensed Nurses or other Staff who are legally authorized to do so in this state, as ordered by physician and in accordance with professional standards of practice, in a manner to prevent contamination and infection. Statement number 8 revealed to obtain and record vital signs, when applicable or per physician's orders. When applicable, hold medications for those vital signs outside the physician's prescribed parameters. 1.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-30 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure physician ordered wound care was provided as ordered for 1 of 1 sampled resident, Resident #61, who had a facility acquired pressure ulcer. The findings included: Record review revealed Resident #61 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and admitted to Hospice services on 02/15/25. Review of the current physician orders documented as of 03/13/25, the stage IV (a wound extending into the muscle and or bone) pressure ulcer should be cleansed with Dakins solution and Collagen particles were to be placed in the wound and then covered with a Superabsorbent dressing. Review of the Nurse Practitioner's (NP) wound care note dated 04/23/25 documented the stage IV pressure ulcer was acquired on 06/05/24, with current contradictory orders to cleanse with Dakins solution and apply Hydrofera Blue to the wound bed, covering with a Superabsorbent dressing. This note documented the use of the Hydrofera Blue was to minimize pain, minimize risk of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-30 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to follow the physician ordered splints for one resident on one sampled resident reviewed for splints, Resident #48. The findings included: Record review documented Resident #48 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Aphasia following unspecified Cerebrovascular Accident, Pressure Ulcer of Sacral Region, Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis following Cerebral Infarction affecting Left Non-Dominant Side. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 00 indicating there was no score documented for mental cognition, as the resident was unable to answer the questions. Section GG revealed Resident #48 had impairment on both sides of upper extremities and both sides of lower extremities. Review of the physician orders dated 03/28/25 revealed to apply left elbow splint for 6 hours as tolerated per day, may remove for care, every shift. Review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-30 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to address residents' weight loss in a timely manner, for 3 of 10 sampled residents, reviewed for nutrition, Resident #40, Resident #13, Resident #28. The findings included: Review of the facility's policy titled Weight Monitoring showed the following: Weights shall be monitored as per the schedule below unless otherwise ordered by the healthcare provider; Monitor weight monthly. Weight analysis: The newly recorded resident weight should be compared to the previously recorded weight. 1. Record review showed Resident #40 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnosis of Aphasia following nontraumatic intracerebral hemorrhage and hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting the dominant right side. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 00, indicating they were unable to conduct the interview. A thorough…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-30 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure it obtained current physician's orders for Oxygen therapy administration for 2 of 3 sampled residents, Resident #75 and Resident #289; failed to obtain orders for changing and dating the oxygen tubing; failed to document the oxygen administration in Medication Administration Record (MAR) for 2 of 3 sampled residents, Resident #75 and Resident #37; failed to initiate a care plan for Oxygen therapy for Resident #289; failed to obtain current physician orders for a nebulizing treatment and failed to date and change the nebulizing tubing for 1 of 3 sampled residents for Resident #75. The findings included: Record review of the provided document, titled, Medication Administration, with a revision date of 10/23, revealed that medications are administered by Licensed Nurses, as ordered by Physicians and in accordance with professional standards of practice, in a manner to prevent contamination or infection. Statement number 10 revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-30 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to adhere to physician ordered fluid restrictions for 2 of 3 sampled residents reviewed for dialysis, Residents #24 and 44. The findings included: 1. Record review revealed Resident #24 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the resident's most recent complete assessment, a Medicare 5-day Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, with a reference date of 04/07/25, documented Resident #24 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12, indicating moderate cognitive impairment. Resident #24's diagnoses at the time of the assessment included: Anemia, Atrial fibrillation, Coronary artery disease, Heart failure, Hypertension, Orthostatic hypotension, GERD, Diabetes Mellitus, Hyperlipidemia, Non-Alzheimer's dementia, Anxiety disorder, Depression, Chronic lung disease, Acute ischemic heart disease, Sacroilitis, Cardiomegaly, Ulcerative rectosigmoiditis, Acute myocardial infarction, Cardiac septal deficit, and Interstitial…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-30 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure behavior monitoring for 3 of 5 sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary medications, Residents #2, #24, and #28. The findings included: 1. Record review revealed Resident #4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A comprehensive assessment dated [DATE] documented the resident had severe cognitive impairment. The resident was receiving antipsychotics and antidepressants. The resident was care planned for at risk for complications related to the use of psychotropic drugs: antidepressant for management of symptoms of depression and antipsychotic for management of mood disorder and Dementia. Review of Resident #4's physician orders revealed an order dated 01/26/25 for Escitalopram Oxalate (an antidepressant) Tablet 10 milligrams one time a day for Depression. An order dated 01/27/25 for Antidepressant Medication - Escitalopram Observe for sadness, tearfulness, and/or self-isolation. Document 'Y' if resident has behaviors and 'N' if…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 26 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-30 · tag F0851 — isolated
    Electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to submit required staffing information based on payroll based journal. The findings included: The facility triggered for excessively low weekend staff per the PBJ (payroll based journal) staffing data report for the 1st quarter of 2025. Review of the 2 week staffing hours for the 1st quarter of 2025 was conduycted. The document revealed low staffing hours on 12/22/24, 12/25/24, 12/26/24, and 12/27/24. An interview was conducted with the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) on 04/29/25 at 12:00 PM. The NHA presented corrected hours on the 2 week staffing sheet, with corroborating payroll document. The NHA stated the information / hours was input incorrectly. The NHA acknowledged the information submitted to CMS was incorrect and prompted PBJ to trigger for low staffing.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-11 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to prepare, store and serve food in a sanitary manner; and failed to provide an appropriate cooling medium for a dialysis meal for 1 of 1 sampled residents reviewed for dialysis, Resident #55. The findings included: On 01/08/24 at 9:09 AM, a brief initial tour of the main kitchen was conducted accompanied by the Certified Dietary Manager (CDM). The following was observed: (1) a burnt pot on the pot shelf with the clean pots. (2) stove and oven is dirty, with burnt on food and grease, (3) The tabletop can opener holder was very dirty, with black grease (4) The ceiling vent near the dish washing area was dirty with black dust. On 01/08/24 at 9:30 AM, an interview was conducted with the CDM. The findings were reviewed. The CDM acknowledged the findings. 2. The facility's policy, titled, Food: Preparation, dated October 2019, documented, in part: Definitions: Ready-to-eat food - means food that is in form that is edible without additional preparation to achieve food safety. Time / Temperature Control for Safety Food (formerly known…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-11 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to initiate baseline care plans that included provisions for Foley catheter care for 1 of 4 sampled residents reviewed for Foley catheter care, Resident #300. The findings included: Review of the Electronic Health Record (EHR) for Resident #300 revealed there were no physician orders for a Foley catheter and no baseline care plan for instructions to provide care for the catheter. The resident's care plans did not include Foley catheter care until 01/10/24. On 01/08/24 at 12:15 PM, Resident #300 was interviewed, who stated he was admitted to the facility 3 days ago from the hospital. He was observed with a Foley catheter with a bedside drainage bag. An interview was conducted on 01/08/24 at 12:54 with Staff G, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN). Staff G was asked in front of the resident's room if Resident #300 had a Foley catheter. She looked at the resident's orders and stated that he did not. The baseline care plans were reviewed with the Director of Nursing who agreed there was no baseline care plan for Foley…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-11 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to utilize necessary care and services to ensure the residents' ability to communicate did not diminish for 1 of 1 sampled resident reviewed for hearing, Resident #89. The findings included: Record review for Resident #89 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Chronic Kidney Disease Stage 4, Unspecified Hearing Loss, Dehydration and Adult Failure to Thrive. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #89 revealed in Section B under Hearing for the question Ability to hear (with hearing aid or hearing appliances if normally used was answered moderate difficulty. In Section C, a Brief Interview of Mental Status score of 13, indicating cognition was intact. Review of the 'Resident Personal Belonging Inventory', dated 09/27/23, indicated the resident did not have any hearing aids upon admission. Review of the Care Plan for Resident #89 dated 09/28/23 with a focus on the 'resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-11 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident received treatment and care in a timely manner for 1 of 19 sampled residents, (Resident #1). The findings included: The facility's policy, titled, Provision of Physician Ordered Services, implemented 11/3/20 and revised 11/29/22, revealed, Qualified nursing personnel will submit timely requests for physician ordered services (laboratory, radiology, consultations) to the appropriate entity. 1. On 01/09/24 at 9:30 AM, Resident #1 was interviewed during the initial interview process, who stated she was supposed to go home yesterday. She had been in the facility since 12/15/23. Record review revealed she had been admitted with Viral pneumonia, Hypothyroid and Anxiety disorder. The documented Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) was 15 on the Minimum Data Set (MDS) admission assessment with an assessment reference date of 12/19/23, indicating she was cognitively intact. She stated that she came in with pneumonia but was feeling much better. She lived at home with a disabled family…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-11 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain physician orders for catheter care for 1 of 4 sampled residents reviewed for catheter care, Resident #300. The findings included: Record review revealed Resident #300 was admitted to the facility post hospitalization on 01/05/24, with diagnoses that included Acute Kidney Failure, Pain in left knee, and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. The social service assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 14 which indicated he is cognitively intact. Review of the Electronic Health Record (EHR) for Resident #300 revealed there were no physician's orders for the Foley catheter, no diagnosis for the catheter and no orders for catheter care. An interview was conducted on 01/08/24 at 12:54 with Staff G, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN). Staff G was asked in front of the resident's room if Resident #300 had a Foley catheter. She looked at the resident's orders and stated that he did not. She turned around and looked at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-11 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. Resident #65 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the resident's most recent complete assessment, a Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented Resident #65 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 02, indicating that the resident had severe cognitive impairment. The MDS documented the resident had no impairments to upper extremities, and was able to eat independently with setup and clean up assistance. Resident #65's diagnoses at the time of the assessment included: Anemia, Hypertension, Depression, Idiopathic Peripheral Autonomic Neuropathy, Cirrhosis of Liver, Hypothyroidism, Low back pain, Adjustment disorder with mixed disturbances of emotions and conduct, Paranoid Personality Disorder, presence of left artificial hip joint, Constipation, Long-term use of anticoagulants, History of malignant neoplasm of large intestine, and GERD (Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease). The MDS documented that the resident had no swallowing disorders and no dental concerns. Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-11 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to dispose of expired medication in 1 of 2 medication rooms, 100 Unit, reviewed for medication storage. The findings included: Review of the facility's policy, titled, Medication Storage, with a revised date of 05/04/22, included: It is the policy of this facility to ensure all medications housed on our premises will be stored in the pharmacy and/or medication rooms according to the manufacturer's recommendations and sufficient to ensure proper sanitation, temperature, light, ventilation, moisture control, segregation, and security. Unused medications: The pharmacy and all medication rooms are routinely inspected by the consultant pharmacist for discontinued, outdated, defective, or deteriorated medications with worn, illegible, or missing labels. These medications are destroyed in accordance with our Destruction of Unused Drug Policy. On 01/10/24 at 4:15 PM, a review of the Medication (Med) Storage Room on the 100 unit was done with Staff A, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN). The following expired items were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-11 · tag F0800 — isolated
    Provide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide diets as ordered for 1 of 7 sampled residents reviewed for nutrition, Resident #89; and failed to provide supplements as ordered for 2 of 7 sampled residents reviewed for nutrition, Residents #69, and #89. The findings included: 1. Record review for Resident #89 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: Chronic Kidney Disease Stage 4, Unspecified Hearing Loss, Dehydration and Adult Failure to Thrive. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #89 dated 12/31/23 revealed in Section C a Brief Interview of Mental Status Score of 13 indicating an intact cognitive response. In Section B, it revealed Ability to hear (with hearing aid or hearing appliances if normally used) is adequate. Review of the Physician's Orders for Resident #89 revealed an order dated 09/27/23 for Regular diet Regular texture, Thin consistency, large portions. Review of the Physician's Orders…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-11 · tag F0810 — isolated
    Provide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide adaptive eating equipment for 1 of 7 sampled residents reviewed for nutrition, Resident #87. The findings included: Record review for Resident #87 revealed the resident was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the most recent readmission date of 12/27/23 with diagnoses that included: Multiple Sclerosis, Paraplegia, Neuromuscular Dysfunction of Bladder and Muscle Weakness. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #87 dated12/31/23 revealed in Section C a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating an intact cognitive response. In Section GG for eating and oral hygiene, the resident had an admission performance of dependent with a discharge goal of substantial / maximum assistance. Review of the Care Plan for Resident #87 dated 08/07/23 with a focus for at risk for malnutrition related to MS (Multiple Sclerosis) paraplegia, depression, sepsis, history of UTI (Urinary Tract Infection),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-11 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to maintain accuracy of medical records for 5 of 19 sampled residents, Residents #87, #1, #300, #250, and #39. The findings included: 1. Record review for Resident #39 revealed the resident was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the most recent readmission date of 07/14/23 with diagnoses that included: Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Gastrostomy Status. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #39 dated 10/18/23 revealed in Section C a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 8, indicating moderate cognitive impairment. Review of the Physician's Orders for Resident #39 revealed an order, dated 09/19/23, for enteral feed order two times a day Jevity 1.5 at 55ml per hour via G-Tube continuously x 20 hours. Start at 5:00 PM daily. Stop at 1:00 PM daily. Flush 50ml water before starting and after stopping feeds. Ensure to record the amount infused per pump reading once a shift. Review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-08-25 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standard for food service safety that included: maintenance of refrigeration units, maintenance of air-conditioning systems, ensure only dietary staff in food preparation and serving area, proper covering of garbage and trash, and proper equipment to be used for food storage and clean dishware. The findings included: 1. During the initial observation tour of the main kitchen on 08/22/22 at 8:45 AM, accompanied with the facility's Food Service Manager (FSM), the following was noted: (a) Observation of the dish machine area noted that there was a ceiling mounted air-conditioning vent located directly over the machine. Further observation noted that the exterior of the vent was full of condensation that was dripping down onto clean dishes and staff working in the area. The surveyor informed the Food Service Manager (FSM) that the condensation was potentially hazardous and could potentially contaminate clean resident dishware. (b) Observation of reach-in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-08-25 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — pattern
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility to have a properly functioning call system affecting the 1 of 2 wings (100 wing), which included 34 rooms consisting of 60 residents. The findings included: An observation of the 100 unit was conducted on 08/22/22 at 10:00 AM. A continuous audible sound was heard throughout the unit and nurse's station. the surveyor questioned Staff Z, a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), Staff Y (LPN), and the Unit Manager (UM) of the sound. All staff referred to the noise as the ghost call light. The staff stated the sound had been going on for a while now, and they could hear the sound in their sleep. Staff Z explained they have had people come out to look at it and nothing had been done. Staff Z stated when a resident would utilize their call light, the call light would illuminate at their door, but there was no distinctive audible sound due to the ghost call light continuously sounding. Staff Z stated they have to monitor the halls frequently for call lights and make frequent rounds on residents to assist with needs. An interview was conducted with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-08-25 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to feed residents in a dignified manner for 2 of 3 sampled residents reviewed for dining (Resident #28 and #223). The findings included: 1. Review of facility policy, titled, Adaptive Feeding Equipment, dated 11/2020, revealed that residents requiring assistance in feeding are potential candidates for adaptive utensils use, as determined by the occupational therapist. Any staff member may refer a resident for a feeding evaluation. Adaptive devices (special eating equipment and utensils) shall be provided for residents who need or request them. These may include but not limited to devices such as silverware with enlarged / padded handles, plate guards, and/or specialized cups. The dietary department. Appropriate utensils shall be placed on the resident's food tray at each meal, and returned to the dietary department, on the food tray, for sanitation. Review of the facility policy, titled, Promoting/Maintaining Resident Dignity During…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-25 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interviews, record review and policy review, the facility failed to initiate a baseline care plan for 1 of 24 sampled residents (Resident #221). The findings included: A review of the facility's policy, titled, Baseline Care Plan, and implemented 11/2020, revealed, in part, The baseline care plan shall be developed within 48 hours of a resident's admission A supervising nurse shall verify within 48 hours that a baseline care plan has been developed. Resident #221 was admitted to the facility from an acute care facility on 08/20/22 with diagnoses that included Urinary Tract Infection (UTI), Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (DM) and Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis following a Cerebral Infarction affecting left non-dominant side. An interview was conducted with Resident #221 on 08/22/22 at 10:30 AM who revealed she was alert and oriented and in this facility to have physical therapy. A review of the Electronic Health Record (EHR) revealed no baseline care plan. A review of the medical chart revealed no paper baseline care plan. On 08/24/22 at 8:39 AM, the medical chart and EHR…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-25 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, record and policy review, the facility failed to obtain physicians' orders for oxygen for 2 of 2 sampled residents (Resident #20 and Resident #34) and failed to obtain physicians' orders for insulin for 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident # 20). The findings included: The facility's policy, titled, Oxygen Administration, implemented 11/2020, revealed Oxygen is administered under orders of a physician. 1. On 08/22/22 at 10:00 AM, Resident #20 was observed and interviewed during the initial pool process. The resident was observed using oxygen via nasal cannula which was set at 3 liters. The resident stated he has been using oxygen all of the time since he came back from the hospital at the end of July [2022]. On 08/23/22, the resident was again observed at 11:26 AM with oxygen on 3 liters via nasal cannula. Review of the resident's Electronic Health Record (EHR) was conducted and revealed Resident #20 was transferred to an acute care facility on 07/14/22 and readmitted to this…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-08-25 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolated
    Provide appropriate foot care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide treatment and services necessary to maintain or improve foot care for 1 of 1 sampled resident, reviewed for and requiring podiatry care (Resident #43). The findings included: During a screening of Resident #43 on 08/23/22 at 8:00 AM, it was noted the resident was in bed with both feet exposed. Further observation of the feet and specifically the toes noted that toes nails were exceptionally long and discolored gray / black. In particular, the resident's great toes (Left and right) toenails were over 1 inch long from the top of the toe. Interview at the time of the observation, 08/23/22 at 8:00 AM, noted the resident to have mild confusion and noted to state that his toenails are too long and has requested to cut but could no recall the staff that he told. The resident requested the surveyor's assistance in scheduling Podiatry care. Following the observation and interview with Resident #43, an interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON) concerning the toenail issue. The DON stated that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-25 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide restorative care for 1 of 1 sampled resident, Resident #58, reviewed for range of motion. The findings included: A review of the facility's policy, titled, Restorative Nursing Program, dated 11/2020, documented: The Restorative Nurse is responsible for maintaining a current list of residents who require restorative nursing services, and for ensuring that all elements of each resident's program are implemented. The discharging therapist, Restorative Nurse, or designated licensed nurse will communicate to the appropriate restorative aid, the provisions of the resident's restorative nursing plan, providing any necessary training to carry out the plan. Record review revealed Resident #58 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis included stroke, with weakness/paralysis affecting the right dominate side. A comprehensive assessment, dated 07/29/22, documented the resident was cognitively intact, and required extensive to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-08-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prevent falls and perform post fall evaluations for 1 of 5 sampled residents, reviewed for falls (Resident #331). The findings included: A review of the facility's Fall Prevention Program, dated 11/01/20 and revised 04/09/21, documented: Upon admission, the nurse will complete a fall risk assessment along with the admission assessment to determine the resident's level of fall risk. The nurse shall indicate the resident's fall risk and initiate interventions on the resident's baseline care plan, in accordance with the resident's level of risk. When any resident experiences a fall, the facility will: Assess the resident, complete a post fall assessment, initiate neuro checks if resident hits head and/or unwitnessed fall, notify physician and family, review the resident's care plan and update as indicated, and document all assessments and actions. Record review revealed Resident #331 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. An Admit / Readmit…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-25 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide medication as scheduled on dialysis days for 1 of 1 sampled resident reviewed for dialysis (Resident # 50). The finding included: Review of the Electronic Health Record for Resident #50 revealed she has a Brief Interview for Mental Status of 13, per her admission Minimum Data Set with an assessment reference date of 07/22/22, which indicates she is cognitively intact. She was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Dependence on Renal Dialysis, Cellulitis of Right Lower Limb and End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD). Resident #50 was interviewed on 08/22/22 at 9:00 AM as part of the initial pool process. The resident stated that she goes to dialysis on Monday, Wednesday and Friday in Delray Beach. She stated she leaves for dialysis at 10:45 AM and returns at 4:45 PM. She takes a chicken salad sandwich with her to dialysis and a ginger ale. Review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) for Resident #50 indicated she was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-25 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to secure medications for 1 of 24 sampled residents reviewed for medications located at the bedside (Resident #10). The findings included: Review of the facility policy, titled, Resident Self-Administration of Medication, dated 11/20, revealed: It is the policy of this facility to support each resident's right to self-administer medication. A resident may only self-administer medications after the facility's interdisciplinary team has determined which medications may be self-administered safely, the residents ability to ensure that medication is stored safely and securely. Bedside medication storage is permitted only when it does not present a risk to confused residents. The manner of storage prevents access by other residents. Lockable drawers or cabinets are required only if locked storage is ineffective. The medications provided to the resident for bedside storage are kept in the containers dispensed by the provider pharmacy. All nurses and sides are required to report to the charge nurse on duty any…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-08-25 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — isolated
    Ensure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that therapeutic diets (Fluid Restriction) were followed as per physician order for 1 of 1 sampled resident, (Resident #50), reviewed for dialysis. The findings included: Review of facility Policy for 'Fluid Restriction' (Implemented 11/2020 and Revised 2/2021), documented, in part: It is the policy of this facility to ensure that fluid restrictions will be followed in accordance with physician's orders. Compliance Guidelines: 1. Verify the physician's order for the fluid restriction and an order written to include the breakdown of the amount of fluid per 24 hours to be distributed between the food and nutrition department and the nursing department. and will be recorded on the medical record. 2. The fluid restriction distribution will take into consideration the amount of fluid to be given at meal times, snacks, and medication passes. 3. The food and nutrition department will be notified by facility communication methods of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-25 · tag F0810 — isolated
    Provide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide physician ordered special eating equipment for 1 of 8 sampled residents reviewed for nutrition (Resident #28). The findings included: Review of facility policy, titled, Adaptive Feeding Equipment, dated 11/2020, revealed, in part, that residents requiring assistance in feeding are potential candidates for adaptive utensils use, as determined by the occupational therapist. Any staff member may refer a resident for a feeding evaluation. Adaptive devices (special eating equipment and utensils) shall be provided for residents who need or request them. These may include but not limited to devices such as silverware with enlarged/padded handles, plate guards, and/or specialized cups. The dietary department. Appropriate utensils shall be placed on the resident's food tray at each meal, and returned to the dietary department, on the food tray, for sanitation. Review of the facility policy, titled, Promoting/Maintaining Resident Dignity…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-08-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide contact precautions for 1 of 1 sampled resident reviewed for transmission-based precautions (Resident #30). The findings included: A review of the facility's policy Transmission- Based Precautions (TBP), dated 11/2020, documented: An order for isolation will be obtained for residents who are known or suspected to be infected or colonized with infectious agents that require additional controls to prevent transmission effectively. Make decisions regarding private room on case-by-case basis, balancing infection risks to other residents. Healthcare personnel caring for residents on Contact Precautions wear a gown and gloves for all interactions that may involve contact with the resident or potentially contaminated areas in the resident's environment. TBP remain in effect for limited periods (i.e. while the risk of transmission of the infectious agent persists or for the duration of the illness) and per physician orders. For…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2025-04-30 · tag F0641 — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to accurately document the discharge status for 1 of 3 sampled residents reviewed as closed records, Resident #87; and the facility failed to document the Hospice status for 1 of 2 sampled residents reviewed, Resident #73. The findings included: 1. Record review revealed Resident #87 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged to an Assisted Living Facility (ALF) on 02/14/25. Review of the admission Assessment, dated 01/20/25, documented the resident was admitted post fall for therapy. Review of the Social Services admission Assessment, dated 01/21/25, documented, Resident plan to return back to ALF. Resident granddaughter will continue to provide care. Review of Resident #87's baseline care plan, dated 01/20/25, documented: I prefer to: Discharge to the community. The goal of the care plan was documented as: I will discharge to appropriate environment as determined by my progress and preference. A Discharge summary, dated [DATE], documented,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2025-04-30 · tag F0732 — pattern
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the nurse staffing hours were posted for the correct day for 1 of 4 days of the survey. The findings included: An off-hour recertification survey was conducted on 04/27/25. Upon entrance to the facility at 8:30 AM, the daily staffing sheet was dated for 04/25/24. An interview was conducted with the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) on 04/30/25. The NHA stated it is the responsibility on the weekend supervisor to update the daily staffing sheet.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to SIMCHA HYMAN & NAFTALI ZANZIPER — 79 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 3 of 52.6+0.4 vs chain
Health inspection 3 of 52.7+0.3 vs chain
Staffing 4 of 52.2+1.8 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 53.4+0.6 vs chain
The other 78 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.6★, per CMS)
1 of 5Beavercreek Health And RehabBeavercreek, OH 1 of 5Bradford Heights Nursing & RehabilitationHopkinsville, KY 1 of 5Centerville Health And RehabDayton, OH 1 of 5Clayton Rehabilitation and Healthcare CenterClayton, NC 1 of 5Dade City Health And Rehabilitation CenterDade City, FL 1 of 5Englewood Health And RehabEnglewood, OH 1 of 5Fulton Nursing and Rehabilitation, LLCFulton, KY 1 of 5Gainesville Health and RehabilitationGainesville, FL 1 of 5Garden View Health And Rehabilitation CenterVero Beach, FL 1 of 5Hertford Rehabilitation and Healthcare CenterHertford, NC 1 of 5Longwood Health And Rehabilitation CenterLongwood, FL 1 of 5Lotus Village Center for Nursing and RehabilitatioSparta, NC 1 of 5Magnolia Creek Nursing And RehabilitationCovington, TN 1 of 5Mills Nursing & RehabilitationMayfield, KY 1 of 5Mountain Ridge Health and RehabilitationMonticello, KY 1 of 5Naples Health And Rehabilitation CenterNaples, FL 1 of 5Southpoint Rehabilitation and Healthcare CenterDurham, NC 1 of 5Spring View Nursing & RehabilitationLeitchfield, KY 1 of 5Sunrise Point Health And Rehabilitation CenterRockledge, FL 1 of 5Windsor Rehabilitation and Healthcare CenterWindsor, NC 1 of 5Winter Park Care And RehabilitationWinter Park, FL 1 of 5Xenia Health And RehabXenia, OH 2 of 5Accordius Health at Rose Manor LLCDurham, NC 2 of 5Barren County Nursing and RehabilitationGlasgow, KY 2 of 5Bellbrook Health And RehabBellbrook, OH 2 of 5Cherokee Park RehabilitationLouisville, KY 2 of 5Clinton PlaceClinton, KY 2 of 5Collierville Nursing And Rehabilitation, LlcCollierville, TN 2 of 5Eden Rehabilitation and Healthcare CenterEden, NC 2 of 5Fairpark Health And RehabilitationMaryville, TN 2 of 5Glenview Health and RehabilitationGlasgow, KY 2 of 5Green Acres HealthcareMayfield, KY 2 of 5Jamestown Place Health And RehabJamestown, OH 2 of 5Lilac At Bayview, TheSaint Augustine, FL 2 of 5Madisonville Health and Rehabilitation, LLCMadisonville, KY 2 of 5Midtown Center For Health And RehabilitationMemphis, TN 2 of 5Pelican Health at CharlotteCharlotte, NC 2 of 5River Grove Health And RehabilitationLoudon, TN 2 of 5Stonecreek Health and RehabilitationPaducah, KY 2 of 5Sycamore Heights Health and RehabilitationLouisville, KY

Showing 40 of 78; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
LILAC SNF HOLDCO LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 01/01/2022
PPG GC OPCOS II LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 01/01/2022
VENTURA OPERATIONS HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 01/01/2022
MASTERSON, JOHNIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 11/03/2020
GORELICK, BATYAIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 05/01/2021

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$12.9M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+12.8%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$3.3M
Related-party expense30% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 55%Medicare 20%Other / private 25%

This home reported $3.3M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 30% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$343per resident / day
operating cost
$10,423per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$393per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in FL

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Florida Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Florida
$10,342/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,610/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 105146. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-04-30, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next