Pruitthealth-North Tampa, LLC

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

64.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 461 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 49.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 222 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.65 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 90% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 17% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 90 beds and averages 84.2 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.67 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.65 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.21 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.09 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.90 on weekdays — 21% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.81 to 0.26 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 52% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

22 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 12 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · D2025-09-24 · tag F0729 — isolated
  Verify that a nurse aide has been trained; and if they haven't worked as a nurse aide for 2 years, receive retraining.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) registry verification and competency evaluation for one staff member (Staff E) of five staff reviewed. Findings included: On 09/24/2025 at 8:15 a.m., an interview was conducted with the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA), he stated the facility had no Personal Care Assistant (PCA) program, nor did the facility use Personal Care Assistants (PCAs). A review of the facility's employee list obtained on 09/24/2025, listed Staff E with a job title of Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) with a position start date of 01/19/2025. On 09/24/2025 a review of Staff E's personnel file was conducted. The file revealed no evidence of the staff member being a licensed CNA. On 09/24/25 at 10:51 a.m., a Background Screening for Staff E was reviewed on the Clearinghouse Screening Management system. The screening revealed Staff E's Level II eligibility determination was a status of Agency Review Required. The licensure…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-19 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews the facility failed to ensure wound care was done in a timely manner and dressings were dated for three residents (#182, #277, #51) out of four residents reviewed for non-pressure skin conditions. Findings included: An observation and interview was conducted on 6/16/25 at 12:38 p.m. with Resident #182. The resident was observed to have a bandage on his throat area dated 6/11/25. The resident said the bandage covered a stoma (an artificial opening) from having a tracheostomy (trach). He said he had been in the facility for two days and nothing had been done with the dressing. Review of Resident #182's admission Record showed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including gram-negative sepsis and pneumonia due to klebsiella pneumoniae. Review of Resident #182's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), Section C, Cognitive Patterns, showed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating the resident was cognitively intact. Review of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-06-19 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — pattern
  Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to ensure pain was controlled for three residents (#185, #379, #182) out of three reviewed for pain management. Findings included: An interview was conducted on 6/18/25 at 2:15 p.m. with Resident #182. The resident said he had been in the facility for four days and did not have any pain medication for the first two days. The resident said pain had gotten to a 10 out of 10 on the pain scale during that time. The resident said he refused tube feedings because they caused stomach cramps and he couldn't handle any more pain. The resident said he was starting to feel better again after having his medication for the last two days. Resident #182 said the pain was so bad on Sunday, 6/15/25 that he almost left the facility. Review of Resident #182's admission Record showed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including gram-negative sepsis, cutaneous abscess of abdominal wall, spondylosis, and pain, unspecified. Review of Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-19 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
  Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  2. During an interview on 06/16/25 at 11:42 a.m. Resident #29 stated she was getting weaker due to no one at the facility assists her with walking. She stated therapy instructed her to ensure someone was supervising her while walking. During a follow up interview on 06/18/25 at 09:41 a.m. Resident #29 stated having lost endurance since discharging from therapy as no one was available to supervise except when family visits. During an interview on 06/17/25 at 12:13 p.m. Staff V, CNA stated, it is hard sometimes we don't have as many CNAs as needed. Many of the residents are total care and the distance from room to room. Staff V, stated having to cover around corners makes the job tasks even harder to get basic care completed, but certainly at meal times. She stated they did not have time for the extras if asked. During an interview on 06/18/25 at 10:53 a.m., Staff B, CNA stated not having time to complete Range of Motion(ROM) or walking residents around if requested and stated usually the restorative aide completes the task. Staff B stated they don't really need to worry about not…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-06-19 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review the facility did not ensure medications for new admissions were available timely for four residents (#182, #185, #379, #228) out of four sampled for admission orders. Findings included: 1. An interview was conducted on 6/18/25 at 2:15 p.m. with Resident #182. The resident said he had been in the facility for four days and did not have any pain medication for the first two days. The resident said pain had gotten to a 10 out of 10 on the pain scale during that time. The resident said he refused tube feedings because they caused stomach cramps and he couldn't handle any more pain. The resident said he was starting to feel better again after having his medication for the last two days. Resident #182 said the pain was so bad on Sunday, 6/15/25 that he almost left the facility. Review of Resident #182's admission Record showed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including gram-negative sepsis, cutaneous abscess of abdominal wall, spondylosis, and pain, unspecified.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-06-19 · tag F0847 — pattern
  Inform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review the facility did not ensure residents who entered arbitration agreements understood the contract contents for three residents (#228, #51 and #29) of three residents sampled. Findings included: Review of the admission Agreement dated 06/13/25 revealed Resident #228 electronically signed all documents personally, and the appointed representative was not present. On page 44 of the electronic admission agreement, it showed the Arbitration Agreement was signed by Resident #228 accepting the terms of Arbitration Agreement. Review of the admission Record for Resident #228 revealed an admission date of 06/10/25 with diagnoses to include ground level fall resulting in a displaced femur fracture and surgical repair on 06/04/25, hypertension, vascular dementia and other co-morbidities. Review of the Medical Certification for Medicaid Long-Term Care Services and Patient Transfer Form (3008) for Resident #228 dated 06/10/25 revealed Resident #228 required a healthcare surrogate to make…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-06-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY During an initial on 06/16/25 at 10:21 a.m. Resident #229's door had an 8 ½ by 11 (letter size) CDC Contact Isolation Precautions sign printed in color showing two large fonts STOP signs in all capital letters and the following Contact Precautions written between the two signs. The next line revealed in all capital letters Everyone Must: Clean their hands, including before entering and when leaving the room.The following line in all capital letters showed: Providers and Staff Must Also: Put on gloves before room entry. Discard gloves before room exit. Put on gown before room entry. Discard gown before room exit. Do not wear the same gown and gloves for the care of more than one person. Use dedicated or disposable equipment. Clean and disinfect reusable equipment before use on another person. During this tour the PPE cabinet in the hallway outside Resident #229's door revealed only gloves were available and a roll of trash bags at the bottom drawer. On 06/16/25 at 11:30 a.m. Staff W, Occupational Therapist (OT)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-06-19 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — pattern
  Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to implement an antibiotic stewardship program including developing a system to monitor use of antibiotic-resistant organisms for one resident (#378) out of two residents reviewed for antibiotic stewardship with potential to impact the entire facility. Findings included: Review of the admission Record revealed Resident #378 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include other Staphylococcus as the disease classified elsewhere. Review of the June 2025 Medication Administration Record (MAR) for Resident #378 showed the resident was receiving Vancomycin recon 1.25 grams; IV (intravenous), dated 5/29/25 to 6/18/25. The review of the MAR did not show why the resident was on Vancomycin and it was not specified what type of infection she was being treated for. The MAR did not show a specified diagnosis. The review pf physicin orders for Resident #378 showed there was no order for contact precautions and there was no McGreer's Criteria (a set…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-19 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and policy review the facility failed to ensure dignity was maintained for residents during dining in one dining room (between 400 & 500 halls) out of three dining rooms. Findings included: On 6/17/2025 at 11:45 a.m. an observation of the lunch meal service occurred in the dining room between the 400 and 500 hallways. The dining room was full of multiple residents (a total of 14) and several family members/visitors. Multiple staff members were observed assisting with passing out trays from the tray cart. One of the tables had three residents seated, two residents were served their meals and started eating, while the third resident did not have their meal. Another table had three residents seated, one resident was served their meal, the other two residents did not receive their meals at that time. Staff L, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA), was observed delivering the tray to one resident who needed assistance. The staff member sat down and proceeded to assist the resident with eating. Staff L, CNA did not remove the food items from the tray and the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-19 · tag F0655 — isolated
  Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, observations and record review the facility failed to develop a baseline care plan within 48 hours of a resident's admission for one resident (#5) of one resident reviewed. Findings included: Review of Resident #5's face sheet, showed an admission date of 6/15/25, with diagnoses to include metabolic encephalopathy, mood disorder, anxiety disorder, difficulty in walking, cognitive communication deficit, left hip osteoarthritis, cognitive impairment, and fall. Review of Resident #5's medical certification for Medicaid long-term care services and patient transfer form (3008), undated Showed the following Section B. Hearing is impaired, Section E. Medical Conditions generalized weakness, urinary tract infection (UTI) and lactic acidosis, Section G. Patient risk alerts is falls, Section O. Vitals Signs dated 6/15/25 at 7:55 A.M., Section P. Patient Health Status the resident is incontinent, Section S. physical function required two assistants to transfer, Section T. Skin Care - resident has a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$32,812 in federal fines across 6 penalties.

• $9,474 — penalty dated 2025-06-19
• $13,813 — penalty dated 2025-06-19
• $2,470 — penalty dated 2023-10-17
• $2,117 — penalty dated 2023-10-10
• $1,764 — penalty dated 2023-10-02
• $3,174 — penalty dated 2023-09-11

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to PRUITTHEALTH — 95 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 5 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $2.9M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 30% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in FL