PruittHealth- Moncks Corner

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

51.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 35 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.18 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 18% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 12% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 132 beds and averages 111.0 residents a day — about 84% occupied, or roughly 21 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.42 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.85 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.73 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.54 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.77 on weekdays — 33% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 1.02 to 0.43 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 49% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

19 citations, most serious first. The 14 most serious are shown; the remaining 5 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2024-10-07 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and facility policy the facility failed to ensure that Resident (R)1, a resident diagnosed with dementia, was free from neglect by failing to provide necessary care and services to prevent R1 from eloping from the facility which had the potential for serious bodily harm. On [DATE] at approximately 8:00 PM, R1 was found in the parking lot of the facility near a major U.S. Highway (Highway 17) by staff after they were unable to locate the resident for bedtime. On [DATE] at 5:51 PM, the Administrator was notified that the failure to ensure Resident (R)1 was free from neglect, which resulted in a successful elopement on [DATE] at approximately 8:00 PM, constituted Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) at F600. On [DATE] at 5:51 PM, the survey team provided the Administrator with a copy of the CMS IJ Template and informed the facility IJ existed as of [DATE], when a resident successfully eloped from the facility through the front door. F600 were related to 483.12 Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-10-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure that adequate supervision was in place to prevent Resident (R)1 from eloping from the facility. Specifically, on 10/02/24 at approximately 8:00 PM, R1 was found in the parking lot of the facility near a major U.S. Highway (Highway 17), by staff after they were unable to locate the resident for bedtime. On 10/04/24 at 5:51 PM, the Administrator was notified that the failure to ensure Resident (R)1 was free from neglect, which resulted in a successful elopement on 10/02/24 at approximately 8:00 PM, constituted Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) at F689. On 10/04/24 at 5:51 PM, the survey team provided the Administrator with a copy of the CMS IJ Template and informed the facility IJ existed as of 10/02/24, when a resident successfully eloped from the facility through the front door. F689 were related to 483.25 Quality of Care . On 10/07/24 at 2:33 PM, the facility presented a successful plan of removal. The survey team…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-08-28 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of facility policy, observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure 11 of 76 residents, Residents (R)4, R5, R6, R7, R8, R9, R10, R11, R12, R13, and R14, received their physician ordered medications. On 08/27/24 at 5:40 PM, the State Agency (SA) determined that the facility's non-compliance with one or more federal health, safety, and/or quality regulations could cause serious harm. On 08/28/24 at 9:10 AM, the survey team provided the Administrator with a copy of the CMS Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) Template, informing the facility IJ existed as of 08/22/24. The IJ was related to 42 CFR 483.25 - Residents are free of Significant Medication Errors. On 08/28/24, the facility provided an acceptable IJ Removal Plan. On 08/28/24, the survey team validated the facility's corrective actions and determined the facility put forth due diligence in addressing the noncompliance. The SA is considering this IJ at Past Noncompliance as of 08/23/24. An extended survey was conducted in conjunction with the Complaint Survey for non-compliance at F760, constituting…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Actual harm · Gcited before2022-10-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a safe environment for 1 Resident (R)77) of 3 residents reviewed for accidents. Specifically, R77 ingested unsecured medications of another resident, risperidone (antipsychotic), buspirone (anti-anxiety), and gabapentin (anti-convulsant), which were left unsupervised on the top of the medication cart. The practice of lack of supervision of residents, and unsecured medications resulted in the resident experiencing a medical emergency that required the resident to be transferred to the emergency room (ER). Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Medication Administration: Oral Medications dated 12/10/21, revealed it is the policy of (facility name) that oral medications are administered in an organized and safe manner. Review of the facility's policy titled Medication Discrepancies and Adverse Reactions dated 06/22/22, revealed, Definitions: Medication Discrepancy: An inappropriate or incorrect medication…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-21 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, record review, and interview, the facility failed to obtain a physician order for advance directives for Resident (R)11, for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for advance directives.Findings include:Review of the facility policy revised on [DATE], titled Advance Directives: South Carolina, revealed, Procedure: . 3. The Director or Health Services (or designee) will notify the attending physician of advance directives and document such notification in the medical record.Review of the admission record reveals that the facility admitted R11 on [DATE] with diagnoses including but not limited to acquired absence of right leg below the knee, type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic chronic kidney disease, and muscle weakness.Review of R11's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed a Physician's Order dated [DATE], with an end date marked as open-ended, that indicated R11 was a Full Code (direction to implement Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) should respirations and heartbeat stop).Review…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-05 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
  Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R)1 was free from misappropriation of a narcotic medication for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for misappropriation. Findings include: Review of the facility policy last reviewed on 11/15/2024, titled, Prevention of Patient Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation, Mistreatment, and Misappropriation of Property documented, It is the policy of PruittHealth and its affiliated entities to actively preserve each patient's right to be free from . misappropriation of patient property . Definitions: Misappropriation of Patient Property means the deliberate misplacement, exploitation, or wrongful, temporary or permanent use of a patient's belongings or money without the patient's consent. Review of R1's Face Sheet revealed R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included but was not limited to: cognitive communication deficit, anxiety disorder, and unspecified intellectual disabilities. Review of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-06-20 · tag F0730 — pattern
  Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to have a system in place to ensure every employed nurse aide had a completed performance review every 12 months. The facility further failed to ensure each nurse aide received the required 12 hours of inservice based on the outcome of the performance reviews. Findings include: Review of the Annual Skills Fair, dated 08/18/23, did not include the content, the total hours, and did not include the required 12 hours of inservice, based on performance reviews for Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA)s. The Annual Skills Fair included all staff, nurses, certified nursing assistants, maintenance, and housekeeping. Review of a document on 06/20/24 at 2:45 PM, titled, Course Completion History listed a total of 20 CNAs. Further review revealed 13 of the 20 CNAs had not completed the required 12 hours of inservice. The CNAs that completed at least 12 hours of training, did not mention receiving a performance review. During an interview on 06/20/24 at 3:00 PM, the Administrator confirmed that each employee had attended the annual skills…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-06-20 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, interview, review of facility policy, and manufacturer labeling, the facility failed to assure that medications were properly stored for 1 of 20 residents, 1 of 2 medication rooms and 2 of 2 treatment carts. Findings include: During an initial tour on 06/18/24 at approximately 10:36 AM, an opened bottle of esomeprazole magnesium 20 mg (milligram) (a proton pump inhibitor used to treat GERD (gastroesophageal reflux disease)) was observed sitting on the bedside table belonging to Resident (R) 66, R66 was not in the room. During an observation, from the entrance to R66's room, on 06/18/24 at approximately 11:41 AM, the opened bottle of esmoprazole magnesium was still sitting on R66's bedside table and the resident was still not in the room. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)1 was walking on the unit and was asked to come to the room. During an interview on 06/18/24 at approximately 11:41 AM, LPN1 acknowledged the finding and stated she would discard the medication and did not know how it got there. During an interview on 06/18/24 at approximately 12:15…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-06-20 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, record review, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to maintain the dignity of Resident (R)40, for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for dignity. Specifically, R40's nose hairs failed to be trimmed. Findings include: Review of the facility's Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) Position Description with a modified date of September 2016 indicated, the job's purpose is that it, Provides each of the assigned patients with routine daily nursing care and services in accordance with the patient's assessment and care plan, and as directed by the nurse supervisor. Further review of the description under Key Responsibilities indicates that CNAs Assists patients in dressing, or undressing, and personal grooming e.g., oral/denture care, brushing hair, trimming fingernails and toenails, skin care and shaving. Review of the facility's policy titled Documentation: Charting Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) dated for 01/11/24 under Policy Statement revealed, It is required for Activities…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-06-20 · tag F0644 — isolated
  Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R)8, with a diagnoses of post traumatic stress disorder and bipolar disorder, was referred and screened for possible needed services, utilizing the PASARR Level II screening and evaluation tool for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for PASARR Level II. Findings include: Review of R8's Face Sheet revealed the facility admitted R8 on 06/14/18, with diagnoses including, but not limited to: cerebral vascular accident, anxiety, pain disorder, morbid obesity, and panic disorder. Review of R8's PASARR Level I Screening was completed on 06/28/17, prior to admission and did not include the diagnoses of bipolar disorder and the post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), panic disorder nor anxiety disorder. The PASARR Level I did state under recommendation, No further evaluation recommended, but indicators are present. State reasons below. No reasons were provided on the PASARR Level I. Review R8's Medical Record on 06/19/24 at 2:54 PM, revealed diagnosis of PTSD dated 01/28/20 and 05/03/23, bipolar disorder, anxiety disorder…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-20 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to update Resident (R)677's Care Plan related to oxygen use and pain management for 1 of 5 residents reviewed. Furthermore, the facility failed to accurately reflect R31's advance directives in the Care Plan for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for Advance Directives. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Care Plans with a revised date of [DATE], documented, It is the policy of the health care center for each patient/resident to have a person - centered baseline care plan followed by a comprehensive care plan developed . The baseline care plan should be updated to reflect changes since base line care plan implementation. 3. The comprehensive person-centered care plan is developed to include measurable goals and timeframes to meet a patient/resident's medical, nursing and psychosocial needs . Review of the facility policy titled Advance Directives: South Carolina with a reviewed date of [DATE], documented, This healthcare center…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-06-20 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of the facility policy, observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure proper hand washing during wound care for Resident (R)13. Furthermore the facility failed to properly clean the wounds and additionally failed to ensure resident privacy before providing wound care for 1 of 1 resident observed for wound care. Findings include: Review of the undated facility policy titled, Guidelines for Cleansing and Observing a Wound, states as the Procedure: 1. Identify resident. 3. Explain procedure to resident. 4. Perform hand hygiene according to facility/protocol. 5. [NAME] personal protective equipment as appropriate for procedure. 6. Apply cleansing solution to the sponge, then squeeze it so it is not dripping. 7. Gently clean the wound with the ordered cleanser or normal saline. 9. To cleanse an injury or pressure ulcer, work in half circles or full circles, beginning in the center of the wound and working outward. Cleanse the skin at least one inch beyond the edge of the dressing. Use a new sponge for each circle. 10. Avoid rubbing back and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-06-20 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of the facility policy, observation, and interview, the facility failed to follow a procedure during catheter care to prevent infections for Resident (R)13, for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for catheter care. Finding include: Review of the undated facility policy tiled Catheter Care states for a female resident, 1. Wet washcloth and sparingly apply soap or perineal cleanser. 2. Separate inner labia with nondominant hand. Wash down the center, wiping downward from front to back and stopping at the base of the labia. Continue washing, wiping from front to back, alternating from side to side moving outward to the thighs. Turn the wash cloth or use a new washcloth for each area. 3. Rinse and dry the urethral and perineal area, working in the same direction until the entire area is clean, soap free, and dry. 4. Hold catheter tubing to one side and support against leg to avoid traction or unnecessary of the catheter while washing perineum. Keep drainage bag below level of the bladder. 5. When washing, rinsing, and drying the urethral area: a. Gently wash, rinse and dry around…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-06-20 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of facility policy, observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to establish a physician order related to oxygen use for Resident (R)677, for 1 of 5 residents reviewed. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Oxygen Administration revised on 08/02/23, indicated, Oxygen will be administered by licensed personal only when ordered by the physician, PA, or NP. Review of R677's Face Sheet revealed R677 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including but not limited to: shortness of breath and paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Review of R677's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 05/28/24, indicated the use of oxygen therapy. Review of R677's Physician Orders did not indicate an order for the use of oxygen therapy. Review of R677's Care Plan did not include a Care Plan for oxygen therapy. Review of a Physician Progress Note dated 05/24/24, indicated R677 received oxygen therapy via nasal cannula at 2 liters on 05/24/24, and at 3 liters on 05/27/24, 05/28/24, 05/29/24, 06/05/24. During an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$21,970 in federal fines across 3 penalties.

• $5,422 — penalty dated 2024-10-07
• $5,423 — penalty dated 2024-10-07
• $11,125 — penalty dated 2024-06-20

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to PRUITTHEALTH — 95 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 13 rows in the source record cover these 11 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 83% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $2.6M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 29% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in SC