Pruitthealth - Magnolia Manor

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

59.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 251 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 56.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 109 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.31 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 51% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 9% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 100 beds and averages 85.5 residents a day — about 86% occupied, or roughly 14 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.98 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.97 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.13 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.23 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.27 on weekdays — 24% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 1.12 to 0.57 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 46% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

28 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 18 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-11 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident and staff interviews, record reviews, and review of the facility policy titled, Residents' Rights, the facility failed to provide care in a manner that maintained each resident's dignity and respect for one of 40 sampled residents(R) (R38). This deficient practice had the potential to compromise the residents' rights to be treated with dignity and respect. Findings Include:Review of the facility policy titled, Residents Rights, with a revision date of 12/01/2023 documented, It is policy of the healthcare center to promote and protect the rights of patients/ residents residing in the center. In addition, all patients/ residents and their responsible parties must sign a written statement of acknowledgement and given a copy of the center's patients/ resident rights and responsibilities . Procedure . 2. The center will make every effort to assist the patient/ resident in understanding and exercising his/her rights to assure the patient/resident is always treated with respect, kindness…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-11-01 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, staff interviews, and review of the facility's policy titled, Labeling, Dating, and Storage, the facility failed to discard expired items, failed to label and date items in one reach-in refrigerator, one walk-in cooler, and one dry storage area. The facility also failed to ensure food was delivered to residents receiving meals in one of three dining rooms in a sanitary manner related to proper hand washing and sanitation during the delivery of food. This deficient practice had the potential to affect eight residents eating in the 500-hall dining room. The failure had the potential to promote foodborne illnesses associated with bacterial growth and cross-contamination for 89 of 91 residents who received an oral diet. Findings included: Review of the policy titled Labeling, Dating, and Storage revised on 11/11/2022 revealed, 1. Food and beverage items will have an identifying label as well as a received date and opened date, as applicable; for items prepared onsite, a 'use by' date will also be indicated. 4. Food and beverage items will be discarded according to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-11-01 · tag F0645 — pattern
  PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. Record review revealed R16 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of anxiety and dementia, with dementia being the primary diagnosis. Resident had an order for psychiatric services and received psych counseling services for anxiety during her stay. Record review of Physician Order Form (POF) dated October 2024 revealed R16 received the following medications, alprazolam (Xanax) 1 mg tablet twice a day (order start date 5/9/2024). Resident also had an order for Effexor 75 mg twice a day (start date 6/1/2023). Record review revealed no PASARR Level ll. Review of progress notes revealed R16 had a history of displaying irrational behaviors since admission as defined/documented in the care plan. Record review revealed a care plan created 4/21/2022 (last revised 4/10/2024) documented and identified problems as irrational behaviors of, canceling medical appointments, refusing care, refusal for family to receive notifications about her significant changes, making false allegations regarding her care, keeping over the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-11-01 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — pattern
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to provide evidence that nutrition assessments were completed by the Registered Dietitian (RD) for three of three residents (R) (R66, R44, and R46). Specifically, they failed to complete an admission nutrition assessment for one resident (R66), and follow-up assessments for two residents (R44 and R46), who were identified with weight loss. Findings included: A facility policy on nutrition assessments was requested but not provided. 1. Record review revealed that R66 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of but not limited to Alzheimer Disease, dementia, peripheral vascular disease, and atherosclerotic heart disease of native coronary artery without angina pectoris. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documented unable to determine Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score, which indicated severe cognitive impairment. Review of weights at the time of admission on [DATE] documented 130 pounds…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-11-01 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record reviews, and review of the facility's policy titled, Medication Administration: General Guidelines, the facility failed to maintain effective infection control practices for three of four residents (R) (R21, R31, R34) during medication administration. Specifically, the facility failed to maintain infection practices for one resident (R21) during a fingerstick blood sugar check, during inspection of the PPE (personal protective equipment) cart that was not maintained in a sanitary manner, during observation of dining, observation in resident rooms where dirty IV (intravenous) tubing was left, and during resident screening where staff were seen sitting on resident's beds. The deficient practices had the probability to increase the potential for cross-contamination and spread of infection. Findings included: Review of the facility's policy titled, Medication Administration: General Guidelines dated 2014 revealed under the Policy Statement, Medications are administered as…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-01 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident and staff interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide care in a manner that maintained or enhanced resident's rights, dignity and respect. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure facial hair was removed when requested for one female resident (R) (R36) of 28 sampled residents. Findings included: A facility policy on ADL care was requested during the survey but was not provided. Record review for R36 revealed the following diagnoses not limited to dementia and cardiopulmonary heart disease. Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating little to no cognitive impairment. MDS also revealed R36 required partial moderate assistance with bathing/personal hygiene and required the use of a walker/wheelchair for ambulation/mobility. Record review of R36's Activities of Daily Living (ADL) care plan created 2/24/2023 identified a problem, an ADL Decline related to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-01 · tag F0554 — isolated
  Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident and staff interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure unauthorized and expired medications were not stored at the bedside of one of 28 residents (R) (R16). The deficient practice had the potential to allow unauthorized access of unsecured medications to residents and visitors. Findings included: A facility policy on self-administering medications was requested but not provided. Record review for R16 revealed diagnoses of but not limited to unspecified dementia, paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, chronic kidney disease, stage 4 (severe), and pulmonary hypertension. Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating little to no cognitive impairment. Continued review revealed that R16 was not assessed to self-administer medications. Observation on 10/29/2024 at 9:53 am revealed a bottle of expired prescription medication labeled premium saline moisturizing nasal spray…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-01 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident and staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility's policy titled, Advance Directives, the facility failed to provide residents and/or representatives written information with options regarding their right to accept or refuse medical or surgical treatment for four Residents (R) (R52, R65, R15, R29) out of a sample size of 28 residents reviewed. This failure denied the residents and/or representatives the opportunity to have choices and preferences with their health care decisions and formulating an Advance Directive. Findings included: Review of the policy titled Advance Directives dated 2014, under Procedure revealed, Prior to, or upon Admission, the patient/resident and/or their responsible party will be asked about the existence of any advance directives. The Advance Directive Checklist, which is in the Georgia admission Packet, will be completed. 1. Record review revealed R52 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses not limited to chronic diastolic congestive…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-01 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY [NAME], [NAME] Based on observations, staff interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure the facility was maintained in a safe, clean, and homelike environment on three of eight halls (Hall 600, 700, and 800). Specifically, the facility failed to replace a stained pillow for R53, failed to ensure the common area on two halls were free of trip hazards from electrical sockets on the floor on the 700 and 800 halls, failed to repair one cracked toilet on the 600 hall, and failed to maintain the sanitation of three water fountains covered in a thick beige/white hard scale substance. The deficient practice had the potential to cause an unsafe and unsanitary environment. Findings included: A facility policy on environment was requested but not provided. 1. Observation on 10/30/2024 at 11:00 am on the 700-hall common area revealed the electrical socket was in the floor. There was one lamp on each end of the couch. Each lamp was plugged into the electrical socket near the hallway. The lamp farthest away…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-01 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and review of the facility's policy titled, Grievances: Healthcare Centers, the facility failed to ensure residents were informed of the name of the Grievance Official and how to file a grievance. Spceifically, the facility failed to ensure that all residents who resided in the facility were knowledgeable of the grievance process. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Grievances: Healthcare Centers, revised 1/10/2024 revealed the following under Policy Statement: The Administrator of each healthcare center serves as its grievance official and is responsible for the following: overseeing the grievance process; receiving and tracking grievances through to the conclusion; leading necessary investigations; maintaining confidentiality of all information associated with grievances (for example, the identity of the patient for those grievances submitted anonymously); issuing written grievance decisions to the person who filed the grievance (if known); and coordinating with state and federal agencies as necessary in light of specific allegations. During…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to PRUITTHEALTH — 95 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 3 rows in the source record cover these 2 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $3.9M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 34% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in GA