PruittHealth - Lilburn

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

45.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 63 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.13 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 9% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 2% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 152 beds and averages 118.8 residents a day — about 78% occupied, or roughly 33 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.02 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.54 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.86 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.56 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.21 on weekdays — 20% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.60 to 0.41 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 49% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

23 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 10 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · K2023-09-18 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — pattern
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record review, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from abuse. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure four residents (R) (residents (R9, R14, R25, and one unknown resident) were free from sexual abuse by R10; and eight residents (R15, R11, R19, R20, R16, R17, and R18) were free from physical abuse in a sample of 35 residents. On 9/13/2023 a determination was made that a situation in which the facility's noncompliance with one or more requirements of participation had the likelihood to cause serious injury, harm, impairment, or death to residents. Facility Administrator was informed of the Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) on 9/13/2023 at 10:32 a.m. The noncompliance related to the Immediate Jeopardy was identified to have existed on 4/23/2022. At the time of exit on 9/18/2023, an acceptable Immediate Jeopardy Removal Plan had not been received therefore the IJ remained ongoing. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Prevention of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · K2023-09-18 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — pattern
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record reviews, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to thoroughly report and investigate incidents of abuse. Specifically, the facility failed to report and/or thoroughly investigate incidents of sexual abuse for four residents (R) (residents (R9, R14, R25, and one unknown resident); and of physical abuse for eight residents (R15, R11, R19, R20, R16, R17, R10, R18) in a sample of 35 residents. On 9/13/2023 a determination was made that a situation in which the facility's noncompliance with one or more requirements of participation had the likelihood to cause serious injury, harm, impairment, or death to residents. Facility Administrator was informed of the Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) on 9/13/2023 at 10:32 a.m. The noncompliance related to the Immediate Jeopardy was identified to have existed on 4/23/2022. At the time of exit on 9/18/2023, an acceptable Immediate Jeopardy Removal Plan had not been received therefore the IJ remained ongoing. Findings include: Review of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · K2023-09-18 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — pattern
  Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews, record review, and review of the Administrator position description, facility Administration failed to effectively oversee an abuse prevention program to promote, foster and maintain an abuse free environment. The facility census was 113. On 9/13/2023 a determination was made that a situation in which the facility's noncompliance with one or more requirements of participation had the likelihood to cause serious injury, harm, impairment, or death to residents. Facility Administrator was informed of the Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) on 9/13/2023 at 10:32 a.m. The noncompliance related to the Immediate Jeopardy was identified to have existed on 4/23/2022. At the time of exit on 9/18/2023, an acceptable Immediate Jeopardy Removal Plan had not been received therefore the IJ remained ongoing. Findings include: Review of the Administrator's position description signed by the Administrator on 2/6/2022 revealed the job purpose is to direct the day-day functions of the nursing center in accordance with federal, state, and local regulations that govern long-term care centers .…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility's policies titled, Infection Prevention-Hand Hygiene, Infection Control: Glucometer Cleaning and Disinfecting, and Infection Control Prevention and Control Activities, the facility failed to perform hand hygiene and sanitize shared medical equipment while providing care to four residents during medication pass. The facility sample was 63 residents. This failure had the potential to increase the risk of infection transmission among residents and staff. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Infection Prevention-Hand Hygiene, updated 10/15/2024 revealed the Policy section included D. Indications Requiring Hand Wash or Hand Rub. 1. Before and after contact with the resident. 2. Before donning gloves, including sterile gloves 4. After contact with a resident's intact skin, (i.e., taking blood pressure, pulse, and lifting/turning a resident) .7. Immediately after removal of personal protective equipment (e.g., gloves, gown, facemasks). Review of the facility's policy titled Infection…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-15 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, staff interviews, and review of the facility policy, titled, Clean air filters, the facility failed to maintain clean Packaged Terminal Air Conditioner (PTAC) filters for one room [ROOM NUMBER] out of 18 rooms in B Hall. This deficient practice had the potential to compromise the health and safety of the residents by increasing the risk of infections. Findings Include: 1. A review of the facility's policy, titled Clean air filters, revealed the Steps section was, 2. Remove air filter and inspect for cleanliness. If filter is dirty either wash or replace depending on type of filter. If clean, reinstall filter. An observation on 5/12/2025 at 3:04 pm and 5/14/2025 at 4:42 pm, observed in room [ROOM NUMBER], PTAC filters with grey, fuzzy debris. Interview walking rounds on 5/15/2025 at 9:45 am with the Maintenance Director (MD) confirmed dirty PTAC unit. MD revealed the maintenance staff clean the filters monthly and they keep a log of this; however, they didn't get a chance due…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-15 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
  Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and staff interviews the facility failed to document behavior monitoring for two resident(s) (R) (R10 and R56) of 63 sampled residents who required behavior monitoring for psychotropic medication use. Findings include: 1. admission Date: 10/28/2016 with the following pertinent diagnoses: primary generalized (osteo)arthritis, type 2 diabetes mellitus without complications, essential (primary) hypertension, depression, unspecified, anxiety disorder, unspecified, active acute embolism and thrombosis of unspecified deep veins of left lower extremity, other idiopathic peripheral autonomic neuropathy, insomnia, unspecified, pain in left knee, pain in left hand, pain in unspecified knee, pain in left wrist, abrasion, left knee, sequela, and rheumatoid arthritis, unspecified. A review of the quarterly minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Section C - Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) 12, indicating mild cognitive impairment. Section D: indicating mild depressive…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-15 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, record review, and a review of the facility's policy titled, Care Plans, the facility failed to follow care plan related to (r/t) allergy restrictions concerning chocolate for one resident (R) (R56) out of 63 sample residents. This failure had the potential to result in an adverse allergic reaction. Findings included: Review of the policy titled, Care Plans, dated 2022, indicated, admission Comprehensive Plan of Care - 3. The comprehensive person -centered care plan is developed to include measurable goals and time frames to meet a patient/resident's medical, nursing and psychosocial needs the services that are to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment. A review of the Electronic Health Record (EHR) for R56 revealed she was admitted on [DATE] and has the following diagnosis but not limited to schizophrenia, dementia, post-traumatic stress syndrome…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-15 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, staff interviews, and a review of the facility's policy titled, Care Plan the facility failed to update the care plan for resident (R) R30 to accurately reflect the resident's code status for one of 63 sampled residents. This failure had the potential to result in the provision of care that was not aligned with the resident's end-of-life wishes, potentially causing physical and emotional harm. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Care Plans, updated 7/27/2023 reveals under Policy .section 7 .Update care plan electronically. When applicable, write a new goal, discontinue approaches and /or add approaches Care Plan Review and Update: 1 .Care plan updates/reviews will be performed within 7 days of each quarterly assessment, each acute change in condition, and as needed following each hospital stay. 2. Discontinued problems, goals, or approaches should be indicated directly on the care plan .Updates to the care plans should be made with any changes in condition at the time…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-15 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff and resident interviews, record reviews, and review of the facility's policy titled, Medication Administration: General Guidelines, the facility failed to administer medications as per physician's orders for two residents of 63 sampled residents. This deficient practice may result in residents not receiving necessary treatment, posing a risk to their health and safety. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled: Medication Administration: General Guideline, reveals the Policy statement, Medications are administered as prescribed, in accordance with good nursing principles and practices an only by persons legally authorized to do so .Procedure: .2. Medications are administered in accordance with written orders of the attending physician .9 . The individual records the administration on the patient/resident's MAR at the time the medication is given. At the end of each medication pass, the person administering the medications review the paper MAR or the electronic version…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-15 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews with residents and staff, the facility failed to adhere to documented food preferences and allergy-related restrictions concerning chocolate for one resident (R56) out of 63 sample residents. The facility census was 86. This failure had the potential to result in an adverse allergic reaction, decline in the residents' trust in the facility's ability to meet their dietary needs, thereby impacting overall quality of care and resident safety Findings Include: The facility did not provide a policy related to (r/t) adhering to food preferences and allergy-related restrictions. A review of the Electronic Health Record (EHR) for R56 revealed she was admitted on [DATE] and has the following diagnosis but not limited to schizophrenia, dementia, post-traumatic stress syndrome (PTSD), bipolar disorder and depression. Furthermore, R56's EHR documented a food allergy to chocolate dated 12/8/2020. A review of R56's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-01-18 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — pattern
  Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility's policy and procedures titled Required Training - Partner Education and Tracking and the Alliant Health Solutions Staff development, the facility failed to ensure seven out of 37 Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA) completed the required 12 hours of annual in-service training. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Required Training - Partner Education and Tracking dated 7/15/2016 under section titled, Curriculum(s) and sub-section title Annual revealed, based on job roles, all partners are assigned an annual training curriculum designed to meet federal standards and company expectations. Review of the Alliant CNA Annual Report dated 12/18/2023 for review period 8/1/2022 - 7/31/2023 revealed a staff development review was conducted on 12/18/2023 and problems identified were seven full time Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA) without the required 12 in-service hours per the code of Federal Regulations (42CFR483.35/483.95). Recommendations included, please submit a plan of correction on how the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-01-18 · tag F0644 — isolated
  Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to refer a Level II PASRR (Preadmission Screening and Resident Review) to the appropriate state-designated authority for evaluation and determination of specialized services for one of 43 sampled Residents (R) (R47) reviewed with serious mental illness. This deficient practice has the potential to delay specialized care and treatment for the resident. Findings include: Review of R47's Georgia Department of Medical Assistance PASRR Level 1 Application (DMA-613) Resident Identification Screening Instrument dated 6/3/2022 revealed, the resident did not have a primary diagnosis of Dementia, Serious Mental Illness, or Mental Disorder. Review of R47's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed, for Section A: Identification Information, indicated the resident admitted on [DATE], Section C: Cognitive Patterns, a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of nine, which indicated moderate cognitive impairment, Section N:…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-01-18 · tag F0685 — isolated
  Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff and resident interviews, record review, and review of the facility's policy and procedures titled Specialty [NAME]: Dental Services, Vision Services, Podiatry Services, Hearing Services, and Mental Health, the facility failed to assist one of 43 sampled Residents (R) (R101) in gaining access to vision services by making an appointment and arranging transportation. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Specialty [NAME]: Dental Services, Vision Services, Podiatry Services, Hearing Services, and Mental Health dated 12/6/2022, Policy Statement revealed, It shall be the responsibility of this healthcare center to obtain regular and emergency specialty services for each patient/resident to ensure the highest well-being of the residents. The healthcare center has specialty service providers who provides consultation, participates in in-service education, and is available in case of emergency. Interview on 1/16/2024 at 3:54 pm with R101 revealed that he had reported to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$59,423 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

• $59,423 — penalty dated 2023-09-18
• Medicare payment denial — starting 2023-09-22 for 56 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to PRUITTHEALTH — 95 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 4 rows in the source record cover these 2 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 71% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $2.4M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 20% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in GA