PruittHealth- Ridgeway

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

50.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 30 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.19 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 20% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 2% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 150 beds and averages 128.0 residents a day — about 85% occupied, or roughly 22 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.31 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.549 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.01 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.69 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.56 on weekdays — 24% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.65 to 0.29 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 41% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

19 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 8 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2022-11-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the facility policy, record review, interviews, and observation, the facility failed to ensure 1 resident, (R)114 out of 1 reviewed for accidents related to falls did not sustain a major injury. Specifically, R114 had an unwitnessed fall in the shower room, was transferred, and admitted to a local hospital which resulted in laceration to the head and a fractured elbow. The lack of adequate supervision placed the resident at risk for physical and or psychosocial harm. Findings include: Review of the facility's undated policy titled, Identifying and Managing Dementia Resident Safety Risks, last revised on 10/19/21, revealed the Policy Statement: PruittHealth recognizes that we serve a significant number of residents with various stages of dementia, which may change or progress over time. Residents with dementia are at a greater risk for falls, bruising, skin tears, wandering, and elopement, accidental ingestion of harmful substances, burns, and infection. Each resident's risks must be assessed,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-01-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to keep the kitchen's slicer, walk-in refrigerator's floor and shelves, and two stove top spill pans clean. These failures had the potential to create an environment for food-borne illnesses which could affect 128 residents who consumed food prepared from the facility's kitchen.Findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled, Cleaning Procedures: Kitchen Area, with a review date of 10/23/25, indicated, It is the policy of [Name] to maintain a clean and sanitary environment to prepare patient/resident meals . All soiled, dirty, dusty, surfaces and/or areas within the kitchen should be cleaned and/or sanitized [as needed] immediately upon identification.1. Observation during the initial kitchen inspection on 01/19/26 from 9:50 AM to 10:25 AM, with the Dietary Manager (DM) present, revealed the following concerns with the cleanliness of food storage and food preparation areas:a. Observation of the kitchen's walk-in refrigerator…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure that the environment for one of six residents (Resident (R) 32) remained free from accident hazards to prevent falls and failed to provide adequate supervision to prevent resident to resident altercations for seven of ten residents (R) 66, 84, 136, 120, 93, 125, and 115) reviewed. These failures placed residents at risk for physical harm. Findings include: 1.Review of R32's Face Sheet, located in R32's electronic medical record (EMR), under the Face Sheet tab, revealed the facility admitted R32 from home on [DATE]. R32's pertinent diagnoses included right above-knee amputation (AKA), right hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction, cognitive communication deficit, difficulty walking, and right-hand contracture. Review of the facility's Incident Report dated 06/29/25, provided by the Administrator, revealed the R32 sustained an unwitnessed fall out of bed with head involvement. Staff initiated a low bed as an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-21 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents seated at the same table ate at the same time for two of two residents (Resident (R)124 and R103) reviewed for dignity in dining out of a total sample of 37 residents. This failure had the potential to cause R103 and R124 to feel less dignified.Findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled, Dining Program, with a review date of 10/21/25, indicated, It is the policy of [Name] to enhance the meal experience for all patient/residents who participate in the dining program.1. Review of R124's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 12/05/25 and located in the electronic medical record (EMR) under the RAI [Resident Assessment Instrument] tab, revealed the resident had problems with short-term memory and long-term memory. Further review revealed the resident was coded as being dependent with eating.Observation on 01/19/26 at 12:52 PM revealed R124…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-21 · tag F0646 — isolated
  Notify the appropriate authorities when residents with MD or ID services has a significant change in condition.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure completion of a required PASRR (Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review) when a resident's diagnosis changed. Specifically, for Residents R6 and R9, the facility did not initiate or complete a new or updated PASRR after a change in the resident's diagnosis, which had the potential to affect the residents' need for specialized services. This failure placed residents at risk of not receiving appropriate evaluations, services, and support in accordance with federal requirements.Findings include: Review of the Social Services director for the facility job description provided by the facility indicated under key responsibilities .Responds to resident behavioral and psychiatric issues by completing behavioral and psychosocial assessments, providing treatment recommendations and making referrals to appropriate mental and behavioral health providers.completes psychosocial assessments of residents. According to the South Carolina…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-21 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
  Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record review, interviews, testing and tasting of food served on a requested test tray and policy review, the facility failed to ensure food was palatable and served hot to four of eight residents (Resident (R) 3, R28, R68, and R75). The failure had the potential to negatively affect 124 residents who consumed food prepared from the facility's kitchen by experiencing dissatisfaction with the meals, not eating the meals, and/or experiencing nutritional concerns.Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Food Temperatures, revised 10/21/25, indicated, Policy: Statement: It is the policy of (facility name) that the Dietary Manager or designee be responsible for ensuring that all food has reached and continues to maintain proper temperature prior to tray assembly . Food will be served at palatable temperatures . In a Resident Group Interview on 01/20/26 at 1:30 PM, with eight residents, the facility identified to be reliable historians and cognitively intact, four residents voiced complaints that the food was not served hot to their rooms. 1.Review…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-01-28 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on the facility policy, observations, interviews, and The 2017 FDA Food Code, the facility failed to ensure food was served under sanitary conditions during the 200 Hall meal service on 01/26/2025 for 1 of 3 halls observed during meal service. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Meal Delivery, states as the policy statement: It is the policy of this facility that all food be transported under safe and sanitary conditions to prevent foodborne illness. Review of, The 2017 FDA Food Code, states: The 2017 FDA Food Code discourages bare hand contact with RTE food (i.e., food that is eaten without further washing or cooking) and requires the use of suitable utensils such as scoops, spoons, forks, spatulas, tongs, deli tissue, single-use gloves, or dispensing equipment when handling these food items. Bare hand contact with a RTE (ready to eat) food, such as sandwiches and salads, can result in contamination of food and contribute to foodborne illness outbreaks. Therefore, food employees should…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-01-28 · tag F0732 — pattern
  Post nurse staffing information every day.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on the facility policy, record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure accuracy of staffing posted daily to include the total staff as worked with the census and hours to ensure the resident care and visitors were aware of staffing for each shift as well as each 24 hour period for 10 days from 11/26/2024 through 01/26/2025. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, State Minimum Staffing for Healthcare Centers, states as the Policy Statement: The facility will maintain a minimum staffing hours in accordance with federal law and the respective state's rules and regulations. Staffing shall be sufficient to meet the healthcare needs of each patient/resident as identified in the patient/resident's plan of care. Daily nursing hours will be posted at each facility in accordance with federal regulations. 1. Each facility will complete the Daily Nursing Hours for Healthcare Centers Form. Information on the form will include: a. The facility name. b. The current date. c. Resident census. d. The total number of each category directly responsible for resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-28 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, record review, and interview, the facility failed to accurately document Resident (R)211's advance directives, for 1 of 2 residents. Specifically, R 211 had orders and signed documentation requesting Do Not Resuscitate (DNR), however R 211's Care Plan and Face Sheet documented Full Code. Findings include: Review of facility policy titled, Advance Directives: South Carolina with a review date of 11/28/17 revealed This healthcare center recognizes the right of patients/residents to control decisions related to their medical care. Advance Directives relate to the provision of care when the patient/resident lacks the capacity to make healthcare decisions. Advance Directives executed in accordance with state law will be honored by the healthcare center .The healthcare center shall enter in the patient/resident's medical record any change in or termination of the advance directive for health care that becomes known to the healthcare center .3. Should the patient/resident indicate on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-28 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure a comfortable and homelike environment was provided for 1 Resident (R)36 of 2 residents reviewed. Specifically, they failed to properly clean R36's room and failed to provide R36 with a clean mattress and linen. Findings Include: Review of facility policy titled, Infection Control-Housekeeping Services last revised 10/16/23, revealed, It is the policy of this facility to ensure housekeeping services will be performed on a routine and consistent basis to ensure an orderly, sanitary, and comfortable environment. Further review revealed, A deep cleaning will be performed for each patient/resident room monthly and at discharge and in patient/resident care areas, cleaning of non-carpeted floors and other horizontal surfaces will be performed daily and more frequently if spillage or visible soiling occurs. Review of an undated facility policy titled, Housekeeping: Discharge and Monthly Deep Cleaning of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-28 · tag F0645 — isolated
  PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident had received a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) prior to admission to the facility for 1 of 1 resident reviewed, Resident (R)101. Findings include: Review of CMS regulation of PASRR guidelines, dated revised September 30, 2005, revealed, Federal statue and regulations require all applicants to a Medicaid-certified nursing facility (NF) to be screened for mental retardation or related conditions (MR), and serious mental illness (MI). Review of admission record revealed the facility admitted Resident (R)101 on 02/16/1959, with a diagnosis that included metabolic encephalopathy, vascular dementia, severe with agitation, dementia in other disease classified elsewhere, severe, with agitation, and other frontotemporal neurocognitive disorder. Review of R101's Medication Administration Record (MAR) dated January 28, 2024, revealed Zyprexa Zydis (olanzapine) 5 mg tablet, disintegrating three times a day for agitation;…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to PRUITTHEALTH — 95 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 76% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $2.6M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 23% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in SC