PruittHealth- Columbia
2451 Forest Drive, Columbia, SC 29204 · For profit - Corporation · 144 certified beds · (964) 341-6758 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0602), cited Mar 2024
- a high number of inspection citations overall (20) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $48,523 in federal fines (most recent 2025-07-18)
- its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- about 20% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 4 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 6.7% | 11.9% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 6.2% | 6.3% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.6% | 0.6% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.8% | 1.3% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.0% | 3.1% | 6.5% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.5% | 3.2% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 4.9% | 12.7% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 14.6% | 21.0% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 83.6% | 90.6% | 95.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 5.1% | 5.1% | 4.7% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 16.5% | 16.7% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 31.3% | 15.3% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.4% | 1.5% | 1.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 95.7% | 78.0% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 18.8% | 24.3% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 18.4% | 13.9% | 12.0% | worse |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
44.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 73 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.17 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 16% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 16% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 44.0%CMS range 32.8–54.9 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 13.0%CMS range 9.7–16.8 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.2%CMS range 3.4–10.3 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.02 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 144 beds and averages 133.8 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 10 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.51 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.60 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.17 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.06 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.69 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.71 to 0.34 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 50% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
20 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 10 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · F2025-07-18 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — widespreadProvide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, direct observations, and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure resident meals were served and distributed in a timely manner. This failure to adhere to established meal service protocols had the potential to impact residents' nutritional intake, satisfaction, and overall quality of care.Review of facility policy titled Mealtimes with a revision date of 10/18/2017 revealed: .2. Meals must be established at regular intervals comparable to those in the community.Review of designated mealtimes revealed the following schedule: Breakfast is served from 7:45 AM to 8:45 AM, Lunch from 11:40 AM to 1:00 PM, and Supper from 5:00 PM to 6:15 PM.An observation on 07/16/25 at 9:17 AM revealed a resident in room [ROOM NUMBER] yelling out, Give me something to eat. At the time of the observation, no meal carts or trays were present on the floor.An interview with the Dietary Manager (DM) on 07/16/2025 at 10:24 AM revealed that food preparation is completed and temperatures are to be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-07-18 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on a review of the facility's dietary policies, observations, and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure proper sanitation of kitchen equipment, maintain overall cleanliness of the main kitchen, and properly label and discard expired foods in the 1/1 main kitchen. This deficiency posed a potential risk to the health and safety of the 140 residents who reside in the facility and consume food prepared in the kitchen.Review of facility policy titled Labeling, Dating, and Storage with a revision date of 11/11/2022 states, 1. Food and beverage items will have an identifying label as well as a received date and opening date, as applicable; for items prepared on site, a 'use by' date will also be indicated. 2. Foods will be stored in their original or approved container and, if opened, shall be wrapped tightly with film, foil, etc.Review of facility policy titled Foodborne Illnesses with a revision date of 10/18/2017 states, 3. It is the responsibility of the Dietary Manager to see that dietary employees practice safe and sanitary methods when preparing foods to prevent…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-18 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that Resident (R)90 was provided with a functioning television, compromising the resident's right to a homelike environment. This failure affected 1 of 1 residents reviewed for a homelike environment.Review of R90's Face Sheet revealed R90 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included but not limited to: displaced fracture of the fifth cervical vertebra, unsteadiness on the feet, difficulty in walking, and central cord syndrome at the specified level of the cervical spinal cord.Review of R90's Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 06/03/25, showed R90 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12 out of 15, indicating moderate cognitive impairment. Under Section F0400, Interview for Daily Preferences, R90 indicated that doing his/her favorite activities was very important, with the resident serving as the primary respondent. The MDS also documented that R90 is dependent on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-18 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policy, observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that the medication refrigerator temperature logs were checked daily in 1 of 4 medication storage rooms. Review of the facility's policy titled Medication Storage in the Healthcare Centers states Medications and biologicals are stored safely, securely, and properly following the manufacturer's recommendations or those of the supplier . Procedure #8, the temperature will be logged daily on the refrigerator and room temperature log.During an observation on 07/16/25 at 03:29 PM, the 200 hall refrigerator revealed a large amount of ice pooled in the freezer. The ice is dripping on the medication. A pool of water is resting at the bottom of the refrigerator in the container with the new insulin.During an observation on 07/17/25 at 08:33 AM, the staff moved the 200 hall refrigerated medications to the 300 hall refrigerator.During an observation on 07/17/25 at 08:40 AM, the 300 hall refrigerator logs revealed that 3 out of 4 months observed were not checked daily.During an interview on 7/17/25 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility procedures, observation and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that appropriate infection control procedures related to wound care were implemented for 1 of 1 Residents (R)6 reviewed. Specifically, during a dressing change Registered Nurse (RN)4 was observed removing a soiled dressing from R6's wound and replacing it with a clean dressing, without changing gloves and performing appropriate hand hygiene.Review of the facility's clinical procedure titled, Clinical Procedure: Infection Control-Wound Dressings copyrighted 2025, revealed, Pre-Procedure, Infection control during a dressing change is important to wound care management. By following a standardized protocol, healthcare professionals ensure safety and compliance with evidence-based practices. Procedure.apply clean gloves to remove the soiled dressing, placing it directly into the waste bag to avoid contaminating surrounding surfaces. Remove gloves and perform hand hygiene. Apply a new pair of gloves.Apply clean or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to provide an environment free from potential accident hazards. Specifically, the facility used a mattress to transport Resident (R)1 down the stairwell, when the facility elevators were not working, for 1 of 3 residents reviewed. Furthermore, the facility failed to provide training and documentation related to the safe transportation of resident when the facility's elevator is not working. Findings include: The Facility Policy was requested on 01/29/25 from the Administrator. The Administrator indicated that the facility did not have a policy pertaining to the operation of the elevator or an emergency plan. Review of R1's Face Sheet revealed R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including but not limited to: acute embolism and thrombosis of unspecified deep veins, paroxysmal tachycardia, Type 2 Diabetes mellitus, generalized anxiety disorder, dizziness and giddiness and cognitive communication deficit. Review of R1's Annual Minimum…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-29 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — isolatedConduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and review of the Facility Assessment, the facility failed to include the use of an elevator as part of the Facility Assessment, as it is utilized to transport residents during daily operations. Findings include: Facility Policy was requested on 01/29/25 from the Administrator. The Administrator indicated that the facility did not have a policy pertaining to the operation of the elevator or the completion of the Facility Assessment. Review of a facility document titled, Code Black: Utility Outage, documented that the Maintenance Director (MD) notified [NAME] Elevator of the outage and inquired about the projected duration on 01/15/25 and 01/25/25. Review of the Facility Assessment, with a revision date of July 2024, Section III. Physical Environment, Technology, and Equipment did not document information in reference to occupying an elevator in the facility. During an interview on 01/29/25 at 10:24 AM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)2 revealed that the elevator has been down over the weekend…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-08-01 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure proper sanitation of kitchen equipment and overall kitchen cleanliness in 1 of 1 main kitchen. The facility also failed to discard expired foods in 1 of 1 main cooler. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Labeling, Dating, and Storage with a revision date of 11/11/22, states 1. Food and beverage items will have an identifying label as well as a received date and opening date, as applicable; for items prepared on site, a use by date will also be indicated . 2. Foods will be stored in their original or approved container and, if opened, shall be wrapped tightly with film, foil, etc. 3. Bulk food dispensing utensils (scoops) shall be stored: a. In a clean, protected location if the scoops are used only with a food that is not a time/temperature controlled for safety food. Review of the facility policy titled Foodborne Illnesses with a revision date of 10/18/17, states 3. It is the responsibility of the Dietary Manager to see that dietary employees practice safe and sanitary…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-08-01 · tag F0850 — failed to provide social-work services — widespreadHire a qualified full-time social worker in a facility with more than 120 beds.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, the facility failed to have a qualified Social Worker, on a full-time basis, on site at the facility, for 4 of 4 units. Findings include: No policy regarding Social Services was provided by the facility. During an interview on 07/30/24 at an unspecified time, the Administrator revealed that the facility does not currently have a full time Social Worker on site at the facility. During a phone interview on 07/31/24 at 11:02 AM, the Nurse Practitioner (NP) revealed that the facility does not currently have a qualified Social Worker at this time. During an interview on 07/31/24 at 5:09 PM, the Temporary Social Worker (TSW) revealed that they are not the Social Worker for this facility and work at the sister facility nearby. The TSW stated that they are unsure of how long the Social Worker for this facility has been absent from work but was asked to come and assist for the survey. During an interview on 08/01/24 at 6:36 PM, the Administrator revealed that the Social Worker for the facility is not returning and the position had been empty for a few weeks, but was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-01 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, review of the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) guidance, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure appropriate signage or Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) was donned and doffed, for residents (Resident (R)92, R29, R6, R113, and R35.) on Enhanced Barrier Precautions, for 5 of 7 residents reviewed. Findings include: Review of facility policy titled Enhanced Barrier Precaution last revised on 04/30/24, revealed It is the policy of this facility to implement Enhanced Barrier Precaution (EBP) for the prevention of transmission of Multi-Drug-Resistant Organisms (MDRO). EBP refers to an infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms that employ targeted gown and gloves use during high-contact resident care activities. Procedure: all staff receive training on enhanced barrier precautions upon hire and at least annually and are expected to comply with all designated precautions. All staff receive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 10 citations
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-01 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure that Resident (R)521's advanced directives were updated as requested by their Resident Representative in a timely manner, for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for advanced directives. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Advanced Directives: South Carolina last revised on 11/28/17, revealed, This healthcare center recognizes the right of patients/residents to control decisions related to their medical care. Advanced Directives relate to the provision of care when the patient/resident lacks the capacity to make healthcare decisions. Advanced Directives executed in accordance with state law will be honored by the healthcare center. Patients/residents may revoke their advanced directives at any time without regard to the patient/resident's mental state or capacity. Revocation of any advanced directive for healthcare will become effective only upon communication to the attending physician by the patient/resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-01 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to provide Activities of Daily Living (ADL) care to Resident (R)46, who is dependent on staff, for 1 of 7 residents reviewed for ADL care. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Documentation: Charting ADLs last revised on 02/18/21, revealed It is required for ADL care given by Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA) and Nurses to be documented under Care Assist in patient/resident's Electronic Healthcare Record (EHR). For the healthcare centers not utilizing EHR, all documents will be completed using the CNA ADL Flow Sheet Form. Procedure: the monthly ADL tracking is utilized to code self-performance and coding all ADL's when support is provided. When the Care Assist is unavailable, the ADL documentation should be completed using the CNA/ADL Flowsheet form. CNAs are required to enter documentation at the point of care. Review of R46's Face Sheet revealed R46 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-01 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to accurately provide Resident (R)30 with correct oxygen rate per physician orders, for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for respiratory therapy. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Oxygen Administration with a revised date of 08/02/23, revealed, It is the policy of PruittHealth Hospice and Healthcare Centers/Veteran Homes to provide oxygen safely and accurately to appropriate patients/residents. Procedure: Oxygen will be administered by licensed personnel only when ordered by the physician, PA or NP. The physician order may be written PRN for comfort/dyspnea or may specify the number of liters, method of administration and length of time the oxygen is to be administered. Review of R30's Face Sheet revealed R30 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including but not limited to: Secondary malignant neoplasm of right lung, pulmonary nocardiosis, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-01 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure expired medications and biological's were removed from storage in 1 of 2 medication storage rooms. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Medication Storage in the Healthcare Centers revised on 04/09/24, states, Medications and biologicals are stored safely, securely, and properly following manufacturer's recommendations or those of the supplier. The medication supply is accessible only to licensed nursing personnel and pharmacy personnel. Respiratory Therapists may access medications used in the provision of respiratory services. 3. Nurses are required to check all medications for deterioration and expiration before administration. Nurses are also required to inspect medication storage facilities, including medication carts, routinely. Medication storage areas are to be kept clean, well-lit, and free of clutter. Nursing staff who administer medications are responsible for the cleaning and organization…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-01 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — isolatedDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policy, observation, and interviews, the facility failed to dispose of garbage and refuse properly for 1 of 2 dumpsters reviewed for garbage disposal. Specifically, trash/garbage was not contained in the dumpster, leaving food and debris surrounding the dumpster. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Waste Disposal: Dietary Services with a complete revision date of 04/11/16, states, It is the policy of PruittHealth for the Dietary Department to dispose of waste in an effective manner to prevent a breeding place for insects, rodents, and transmission of diseases . Procedure: 6. Dumpster lids, doors, and plugs should be kept always closed. 7. Dumpster and surrounding areas should be kept clean and free of debris. During an initial walk-through of the outside dumpster/refuse area on 07/30/24 at 4:01 PM, revealed 1 of the 2 dumpsters was observed with the doors open. Trash and debris was observed on the ground, surrounding the dumpsters. During a follow up observation on 07/31/24 at 9:19 AM, of the outside dumpster/refuse area, revealed the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-03-19 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — patternProtect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, interview, and record review, the facility failed to protect 6 of 6 residents from misappropriation of controlled substances. Specifically, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)1 diverted medications from Residents (R)6, R9, R10, R11, R12, and R13 during the month of [DATE] and December of 2023. Findings Include: Review of the Facility Policy titled Prevention of Patient Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation, Mistreatment and Misappropriation of Property dated [DATE], states, It is the policy of [NAME] Health and its affiliated entities to actively preserve each patient's rights to be free from . misappropriation of patient property. Review of the Facility Policy titled Controlled Substances for Healthcare Centers dated [DATE], states, It is the policy of [NAME] Health Pharmacy that medications listed as controlled substances under federal or state regulations will be properly stored with maintained accountability. Review of R6's Face Sheet revealed R6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-04-28 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, facility document review, and interview, the facility failed to provide a clean, comfortable, homelike environment for two of three floors of the facility. Findings include: 1. Observation of the 2nd Floor on 04/26/22 between 9:30 AM and 12:00 PM revealed the following: room [ROOM NUMBER] revealed the closet door broken and doesn't close, paint scuffed and peeling next to bed by door, paint cracked and dirty next to bed by window, and a black substance noted in corners of window. room [ROOM NUMBER] revealed the walls were scuffed up, paint peeling, a black substance was noted on the window seal, and the space next to air conditioner (a/c) was black, room [ROOM NUMBER] revealed the ceiling in the bathroom had brown/orange spots over toilet and sink area, peeling paint around the light above sink, all the doors in the room scratched up, sink appears to be falling into vanity on handle side of sink, there was wood exposed on both sides of sink, and a black substance in corners of window. room…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-04-28 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — patternImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to track and trend antibiotic usage, infections, and perform infection surveillance for eight of twelve months reviewed. This failure placed all residents at risk for the potential transmission of infections and communicable diseases. The facility census was 92. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Antibiotic Stewardship Program revised on 09/26/19 stated, .1b. The ASP [Antibiotic Stewardship Program] Team will consist of the following partners: i. Medical Director/designee; ii. Director of Health Services (DHS)/designee; iii. Infection Preventionist (IP)/designee; iv. Consultant Pharmacist; v. Prescribing Physician/Provider .The ASP Team will monitor and review the following data: i. Infections and antibiotic usage patterns on a regular basis. ii. Antibiogram reports for trends of antibiotic resistance; iii. Antibiotic resistance patterns for multidrug resistant organisms .; iv. Number of antibiotics prescribed [e.g., days of therapy] and the number of residents treated each month; v. Include a separate…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-04-28 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide activities of daily living (ADLs) shower for one Resident (R43) who requires extensive assistance from staff for activities of daily living (ADLs). This had the potential to impact the resident emotionally due to wanting a shower. The facility census was 92 residents. Findings Include: Review of R43's face sheet revealed an admission date of 12/16/20 with diagnoses including but not limited to, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with (acute) exacerbation, major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, and difficulty in walking. Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment of 03/02/22 located on the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) in the MDS tab revealed R43 was assessed as requiring extensive assistance for ADL care including extensive assistance with bathing and dressing. Further review of the MDS assessment revealed R43 has a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 9 out of 15, indicating the resident is moderately…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-04-28 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to perform wound care treatment according to physician's orders for one resident (R)7 out of 3 reviewed for pressure ulcers. Findings include: Review of R7's Face Sheet (undated) located in the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) under the Resident tab indicated R7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including but not limited to, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side, adult failure to thrive, and other infections of the skin and subcutaneous tissue. Review of R7's Significant Change in Status Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed that he had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 99 (indicating that the interview could not be completed); was extensive assist with bed mobility; was always incontinent of bowel and bladder; was at risk for developing a pressure ulcer and had an unhealed pressure ulcer at Stage 1 or greater. Review of R7's Physician Orders,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$48,523 in federal fines across 2 penalties.
- $11,895 — penalty dated 2025-07-18
- $36,628 — penalty dated 2024-08-01
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to PRUITTHEALTH — 95 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 2.9 | -1.9 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 2.8 | -1.8 vs chain |
| Staffing | 4 of 5 | 2.5 | +1.5 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 3 of 5 | 3.6 | -0.6 vs chain |
The other 94 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.9★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 94; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| LEE, PATRICIA | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | since 10/18/2013 |
| PRUITT, NEIL | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 10/28/2004 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 4 rows in the source record cover these 2 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 76% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $2.9M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 20% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in SC
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the South Carolina Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 425013. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-07-18, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.