PruittHealth- Aiken

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

52.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 50 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 51.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 47 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.15 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 11% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 3% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 176 beds and averages 160.1 residents a day — about 91% occupied, or roughly 16 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.33 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.52 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.95 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.54 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.65 on weekdays — 31% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.58 to 0.36 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 34% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

16 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 5 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2025-12-19 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — isolated
  Provide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure staff provided Cardio-Pulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) to one of one resident (Resident (R) 160) who did not have a valid Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) order in place. As a result, R160 expired.The facility's Administrator, Nurse Consultant, and [NAME] President were informed on [DATE] at 11:30 AM that Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) existed at F678 at a Scope and Severity (S/S) of J related to the staff's failure to initiate CPR on R160 without a valid DNR order in place. The Immediate Jeopardy began on [DATE], when staff failed to initiate CPR on R160 without a valid DNR order in place. On [DATE] at 6:16 PM, the facility provided a Removal Plan that was accepted at 6:30 PM. The survey team validated the implementation of the removal plan through observations, staff interviews, and record reviews on [DATE] at 7:10 PM, and the scope and severity was lowered to D.Findings include:Review of the Face Sheet, located in R160's electronic medical…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-12-19 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, and homelike environment for residents who used Spa 100 (the shower room). This failure had the potential to adversely affect all 40 residents currently residing on Hall 100 by preventing effective cleaning of the Spa 100 shower area. Findings include:During the Resident Council Meeting on 12/17/25 at 2:00 PM, some of the residents, who requested to remain anonymous, complained that the shower room on 100 Hall was in disrepair and had mildew on the walls. Observations on 12/18/25 at 12:15 PM of the 100 Hall Spa, with the 100 Hall Nurse Manager, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 6, revealed: A wall area of approximately two feet by two feet in shower one had numerous missing wall tiles. On the opposite wall, in shower one, several wall tiles were missing, and the handrail was loose, held in place by one screw. Plywood was exposed on both walls where the tiles should have been located. In shower two there were several cracked shower tiles on the walls, and there was a black substance on the grout area of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-19 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to provide Resident (R)9 and R10, their right to a dignified existence. Specifically, the facility staff failed to provide R9 with appropriate clothing since his admission to the facility on [DATE]. Additionally, facility staff failed to provide R10 with dignity, when staff was observed completing in-service training in the resident's room. For 2 of 2 residents reviewed for dignity. Findings include:Review of the facility policy titled Resident's [NAME] of Rights revealed, As a resident of this facility, you have and your legal guardian has the right to personal treatment including, be treated with respect and dignity, and the right to personal privacy.Review of R9's Face Sheet revealed R9 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including but not limited to cerebral infraction, other speech and language deficits following cerebral infraction, adult failure to thrive, and anxiety disorder due to known physiological…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-19 · tag F0644 — isolated
  Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to refer residents diagnosed with a serious mental illness for a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) level two evaluation for two of two residents (Resident (R) 4 and R34) reviewed for PASARR out of a total sample of 35 residents. This created a potential failure to identify what specialized services the residents needed and whether placement in the facility was appropriate.Findings include:1. Review of R4's Face Sheet located under the Resident tab in the electronic medical record (EMR) indicated R4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including major depression, bipolar disorder, and mood disorder.Review of R4's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 11/20/25 located in R4's EMR under the RAI tab, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10 out of 15 indicating R4 was moderately cognitively impaired. Review of R4's EMR under the Resident Documents tab revealed a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-23 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
  Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, record review, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that Resident (R)1's medications were not misappropriated for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for misappropriation. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Medication Administration: General Guidelines, with a last review date of 7/22/2024, revealed -Medications are administered in accordance with written orders of the attending physician. -All current medications and dosage schedules, except topicals used for treatments, are listed on the patient/resident's medication administration record (MAR) or within the e-MAR system for facilities using electronic charting of medications. -Medications for one patient/resident are never administered to another patient/resident. Review of the facility policy titled, Controlled Substance Diversion, with a last revision date of 4/29/24 reveals: It is the policy of [NAME] Health Pharmacy Services that medications listed as controlled substances (Scheduled I-V)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-02 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review facility policy, interview and record review, the facility failed to report an allegation of sexual abuse, involving Resident (R)2 and R1, to the Ombudsman, for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for abuse. Findings include: Review of the facility policy, with a revised date of 07/29/19 titled, Reporting Patient Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation, Mistreatment, and Misappropriation of Property documented, It is the policy to comply with all applicable federal and state requirements regarding the reporting of patient abuse, neglect, exploitation, mistreatment and misappropriation of property. The Ombudsman should also be notified as required by state law. Review of R2's Face Sheet revealed R2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including but not limited to: Alzheimer's disease, hypertensive chronic kidney disease, and anemia. Review of R1's Face Sheet revealed R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including but not limited to: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, Type 2…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-09-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure foods were properly stored and labeled. Additionally, the facility failed to remove expired food items from storage, in 1 of 1 main kitchen. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Quick References Shelf Life list, Brief Summary Sheet with an effective date of 11/22/17, and last revised on 02/23/18, states, All opened refrigerator items must have a use by date . all items will be dated on date of arrival. Further review of the policy states, Meat, poultry, fish, pork, vegetables and soup . 3 days shelf life. Review of the facility policy titled Leftovers with an effective date of 09/01/01 and last revised on 10/18/17, states, 2. Leftovers will be covered, labeled, and dated: then stored appropriately (refrigerated or frozen if necessary) immediately after the end of the meal service . 4. Leftovers that have not been properly stored will be discarded. (When in doubt throw it out.) During a tour of the kitchen on 09/10/24 at 9:47 AM, the following was observed in the walk-in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-12 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
  Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, record review, and review of the facility policy. The facility failed to prevent the misappropriation of controlled medication for one of one resident (Residents (R)99) reviewed. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Controlled Substance for Healthcare Centers dated 2014, revealed, It is the policy of Pruitthealth Pharmacy that medications listed as controlled substance (Schedules 1-V) under federal or state regulation will be properly stored with maintained accountability. Reconciliation of controlled substances will be performed at the end of each shift by licensed professional nurses. The healthcare center will obtain and keep on file any permits related to ordering and storing controlled substances required by state or federal agencies. Review of R99's Face Sheet revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including but not limited to: trigeminal neuralgia, chronic pain, third degree burns involving 50-59% of body surface,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-12 · tag F0644 — isolated
  Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to conduct a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) Level 1 for Resident (R)77 prior to admission. Additionally, the facility failed to refer R77 for a PASARR Level II, after a new diagnosis of a severe mental illness, for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for PASARR. Findings include: On 09/12/24 at 9:00 AM, the PASARR policy was requested, the Director of Nursing (DON) and Clinical Competency Coordinator (CCC) stated they do not have a PASARR policy. Review of R77's Face Sheet revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including but not limited to: type 2 diabetes mellitus, tachycardia, and osteoarthritis. Further review of the R77's diagnoses, listed on the Face Sheet, revealed R77 was diagnosed with, Other psychotic disorder on 07/05/21. Review of R77's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 05/08/24, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 8 out of 15…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-09-12 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — isolated
  Ensure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R)25 received a meal based on her preferences, for 1 of 13 residents reviewed during dining. Findings include: Review of R25's Face Sheet revealed the resident was admitted to facility on 04/19/24. R25 was admitted with diagnoses including but not limited to: varicose veins of right lower extremity with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes mellitus due to underlying condition with diabetic nephropathy, venous insufficiency (chronic) (peripheral), muscle weakness, diastolic (congestive) heart failure, cognitive communication deficit, cellulitis, nutritional deficiency, and morbid (severe) obesity due to excess calories. Review of R25's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 04/25/24, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15 indicating the resident is cognitively intact. Review of R25's Diet Orders revealed an order dated 06/28/24 for, CCHO (consistent carbohydrate diet)/Liberalized diabetic plan with special…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-06-12 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that there was a process in place for the review of provider recommendations and continuity of care for 1 (Resident (R)1) of 1 resident reviewed for coordination of care. Findings included: A Resident Face Sheet revealed the facility admitted R1 on 10/12/2020. According to the Resident Face Sheet, the resident had a medical history that included bipolar disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), schizoaffective disorder bipolar type, dementia, unspecified disorder of adult personality and behavior, generalized anxiety disorder, suicidal ideations, and major depressive disorder. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 05/21/2024, revealed R1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, which indicated the resident had intact cognition. The MDS indicated the resident did not have any concerns related to feeling down, depressed, or hopeless. The MDS indicated the resident was independent for self-care and mobility. The MDS indicated the resident had the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$14,069 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $14,069 — penalty dated 2025-12-19

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to PRUITTHEALTH — 95 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 18 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

7 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 77% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $3.6M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 24% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in SC