PruittHealth - Augusta

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.09 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 5% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 45% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 100 beds and averages 84.6 residents a day — about 85% occupied, or roughly 15 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.70 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.35 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.30 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.56 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.17 on weekdays — 39% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.42 to 0.17 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 49% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

33 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 21 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2025-06-26 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility's policy titled Freedom from Patient Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation, Mistreatment and Misappropriation of Property Mission Statement, the facility failed to protect the residents' right to be free from physical and sexual abuse by other residents for two of two residents (R) (R96 and R92) reviewed for abuse out of a total of 31 sampled residents. Actual harm occurred when R96 was physically abused by R64, resulting in R96 receiving a fractured clavicle and head laceration. Additionally, R92 was sexually abused by R93. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Freedom from Patient Abuse, Neglect Exploitation, Mistreatment and Misappropriation of Property Mission Statement, revised 11/15/2024, noted, It is the mission of [Corporation name] and its affiliated providers (collectively, the Organization) actively to preserve each patient's right to be free from abuse, neglect, exploitation, mistreatment, and misappropriation of patient…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2025-06-26 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility's policy titled Pressure Injury Prevention Program, the facility failed to monitor for changes and intervene when a pressure ulcer worsened for one of six residents (R) (R9) reviewed for pressure ulcers out of a total sample of 33. R9 was first identified with a pressure ulcer on 3/21/2025. There was no documented monitoring of the pressure ulcer from 3/21/2025 until 3/31/2025, when the pressure ulcer was noted to have worsened from excoriation to an unstageable pressure ulcer requiring debridement. This caused R9 actual harm when she was subsequently found to have a wound infection and osteomyelitis (infection in the bone). Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Pressure Injury Prevention Program, dated 3/18/2021, revealed, . pressure injury prevention includes assessing for the risk of development. A risk assessment should be performed on admission, at regular intervals, and when the resident experiences a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-06-26 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
  Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure that a Registered Nurse (RN) was on duty for at least eight consecutive hours a day, seven days a week. The failure created the potential for a negative impact on residents' quality of care and had the potential to affect 84 of 84 residents who resided at the facility. Findings include: Review of the Payroll Based Journal (PBJ) report, submitted by the facility, noted four days of non-coverage of Registered Nurses during the second quarter of 2025. The dates were identified as 2/8/2025 (Saturday), 2/9/2025 (Sunday), 3/15/2025 (Saturday), and 3/16/2025 (Sunday). Review of the staffing records, provided by the Staffing Coordinator (SC), revealed there was no RN coverage on the four identified dates as required. During an interview on 6/26/2025 at 9:31 am, both the SC and the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed that there was no RN scheduled on the specified dates. The DON stated, I will come in when we don't have someone to be in the building. I'm sure I was here. The DON acknowledged, at the time of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-06-26 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — widespread
  Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility's policy titled Infection Prevention and Control Plan, the facility failed to have an effective antibiotic stewardship program. This had the potential to result in residents receiving unnecessary antibiotics, increase the risk of multi-drug-resistant organisms (MDROs), and could adversely affect 84 of 84 residents who resided at the facility Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Infection Prevention and Control Plan, revised 6/21/2024, revealed the Facility Administrator and Director of Health Service are responsible for supporting the Infection Preventionist . The Infection Preventionist is responsible for directing all infection control activities and assessing, developing, implementing, monitoring, evaluating and managing the Infection Prevention and Control Program . The section for antibiotic stewardship included, . Monitor antibiotic susceptibility results to detect clinically significant antibiotic resistant bacteria . Monitor appropriate and inappropriate antibiotic utilization in the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-26 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure a safe, clean, homelike environment on two of three units (Unit 1 and Unit 2). Specifically, there was a strong urine smell on Unit 1 and 10 rooms on Unit 1 and Unit 2 (Rooms 1, 2, 4, 9, 13, 20, 21, 23, 25, and 26) with damaged drawer fronts. The deficient practice had the potential to place the residents residing in the rooms at risk of living in a non-homelike environment and had the potential to place the residents at risk of injury related to the damaged drawer fronts. Findings include: 1. During an observation of Unit 1 on 6/23/2025 at 11:45 am, a strong smell of urine was noted. This smell was in the entire hallway, and it was stronger by Rooms 2, 7, 9, and 10, with the strongest smell coming from room [ROOM NUMBER]. Observations on 6/23/2025, at 1:00 pm, 3:00 pm, and 4:45 pm of Unit 1 Hall, revealed that the strong smell of urine continued. There were no times when the smell had decreased in intensity. During an observation on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  3. During an observation on 6/25/2025 at 8:30 am of R49's incontinent care, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA)1 failed to wash her hands after she discarded the dirty brief and dirty gloves prior to donning clean gloves to apply the clean brief. During an observation on 6/25/2025 at 10:40 am of R192's incontinent care, CNA7 failed to wash her hands after she discarded the dirty brief and dirty gloves prior to donning clean gloves to apply the clean brief. During an observation on 6/25/2025 at 11:03 am of R54's incontinent care, CNA2 failed to wash her hands after she discarded the dirty brief and dirty gloves prior to donning clean gloves to apply the clean brief. During an interview on 6/25/2025 at 11:15 am, when asked when she would change gloves during the incontinent care process, CNA2 stated that she would change gloves and wash her hands if the resident had a bowel movement. CNA2 stated that she did not recall being trained to change gloves during the incontinent care process. During an interview on 6/26/2025 at 9:50 am, CNA7 stated that she realized that she should have changed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-06-26 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — pattern
  Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, facility document review, and review of the facility policy titled Pest Control: Dietary Services, the facility failed to have an effective pest control program for the facility's only kitchen. This deficient practice had the potential to place the 84 residents residing in the facility at risk for adverse health effects and a diminished quality of life. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Pest Control: Dietary Services, revised 4/11/2016, revealed, . It is the policy of [facility name] that the Dietary Department is free of rodents and insects at all times to help ensure food is prepared and served in a sanitary environment . Review of the facility's pest control receipts, dated 1/06/2025 through 6/21/2025, provided by the facility revealed: On 1/6/2025: Target Pest: cockroaches, locations insecticide was applied included break room- interior, front door- introduction point, laundry/housekeeping- interior, rear door- introduction point, side door-…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-26 · tag F0628 — isolated
  Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility's policy titled Patient Discharges and Transfers, the facility failed to provide written notification of a facility-initiated transfer to the resident/responsible party (RP) for one of two residents (R) (R72) reviewed for hospitalization out of a total sample of 31. The failure had the potential to affect the residents and/or their representative concerning the residents' appeal rights. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Patient Discharges and Transfers, dated 3/24/2015, revealed, . When infusion therapy services are discontinued or transferred, the patient will meet [facility name] Pharmacy Services criteria for discharge or transfer. The policy did not address providing written notice to a resident or their representative when transferred to the hospital. Review of R72's Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) date of 3/18/2025, and located in the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) tab…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-26 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to review and revise the comprehensive care plans for four of four residents (Resident) 96, R27, R35, and R9) out of a total sample of 31. The failure placed the residents at risk for unmet care needs and their inability to meet their maximum practicable level of functioning. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Care Plans, revised [DATE], noted, . The comprehensive person-centered care plan is developed to include measurable goals and timeframes to meet a patient/resident's medical, nursing and psychosocial needs, the services that are to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment . 1. Review of R96's Face Sheet, located in the electronic medical record (EMR) under the Profile tab, identified R96 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included adult failure to thrive, unsteadiness on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-26 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, staff interviews, and record review, the facility failed to investigate the underlying issue for significant weight loss and assess the resident for goals and interventions for weight loss for one of three residents (R) (R82) reviewed for nutritional status out of a total sample of 31. This deficient practice had the potential to place R82 at risk of unmet nutritional needs. Findings include: Review of R82's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) date of 5/12/2025, located in the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) tab of the Electronic Medical Record (EMR), revealed an admission date of 2/12/2025, had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of seven out of 15, indicating her cognition was severely impaired, weighed 207 pounds, was prescribed a therapeutic diet, and had diagnoses of unspecified fracture of lower end of left tibia, sequela, schizophrenia, unspecified, and muscle weakness. Review of R82's Orders, dated 2/12/2025, and located in the EMR under the Order tab, revealed R82 was to receive a NAS [No Added…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility's policy titled, F-689 Accidents - Water Temperatures, the facility failed to ensure comfortable hot water temperatures were maintained below 110 degrees Fahrenheit (F) for 12 of 40 rooms and for one of two shower rooms. The facility census was 92. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, F-689 Accidents - Water Temperatures dated 1/10/2023 revealed the policy of this facility is to maintain safe water temperatures in resident care areas. Task instructions Number 1 (one) stated: For burn prevention, federal guidelines advise that you keep domestic water temperatures below 120 degrees F, although this temperature can still cause burns if exposure reaches five minutes. Many states have even stricter standards that set maximum temperatures lower than 120 degrees F. Observations during the initial tour on 1/9/2023 beginning at 10:12 am through 2:16 pm revealed, unsafe water temperatures ranging from 113.0 degrees F to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-01-11 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, staff interviews, record review, and review of facility's policies titled Medication Administration: General Guidelines and Medication Administration: Insulin Injections, the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate was less than five percent (5%). Specifically, two of four nurses observed during medication administration omitted an antihypertensive medication, administered insulin using the wrong technique and administered supplements without a physician's order resulting in an error rate of 11.54 percent . The facility census was 92. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Medication Administration: General Guidelines dated 4/10/2019, revealed medications are administered as prescribed, in accordance with good nursing principles and practices and only by persons legally authorized to do so. Review of the facility's policy titled, Medication Administration: Insulin Injections dated 10/27/2020, under the Policy Statement revealed, It is the policy of this facility that the procedures outlined in this policy must be followed to aid…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$180,483 in federal fines across 6 penalties.

• $157,740 — penalty dated 2025-06-26
• $4,017 — penalty dated 2024-01-11
• $4,017 — penalty dated 2024-01-11
• $4,017 — penalty dated 2024-01-11
• $5,346 — penalty dated 2024-01-11
• $5,346 — penalty dated 2024-01-11

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to PRUITTHEALTH — 95 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $2.1M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 21% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in GA