Pruitthealth - Griffin
619 Northside Drive, Griffin, GA 30223 · For profit - Corporation · 69 certified beds · (770) 228-4517 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0602), cited Oct 2024
- it has citations for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565, F0568)
- a high number of inspection citations overall (36) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
- about 22% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 10.7% | 15.3% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 0.6% | 5.6% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.9% | 0.9% | 0.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 2.8% | 2.5% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.0% | 11.3% | 6.5% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 0.9% | 3.2% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 6.0% | 15.2% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 12.0% | 20.5% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 98.1% | 95.0% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 6.3% | 5.6% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 7.4% | 15.8% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 5.5% | 19.9% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 4.0% | 2.6% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 81.8% | 78.4% | 79.4% | typical |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.16 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 15% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 20% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 69 beds and averages 60.1 residents a day — about 87% occupied, or roughly 9 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.63 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.29 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.25 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.13 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.83 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.31 to 0.23 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 45% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
36 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 26 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · E2025-07-17 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility policy titled, Receipt and Storage of Solutions, Medications and Supplies, the facility failed to ensure an opened multiuse medication vial was dated when opened on one of two medication carts (Cart A). In addition, the facility failed to ensure that one of two medication carts (Cart A) was maintained in a sanitary manner. These deficient practices had the potential to place the residents at risk of receiving outdated medications and medications from an unsanitary environment. Findings include:Review of the facility policy titled, Receipt and Storage of Solutions, Medications and Supplies, reviewed 7/3/2024, revealed the Policy Statement stated, Solutions and or medications and ancillary supplies must be stored appropriately prior to administration of infusion therapy.During concurrent observation and interview on 7/16/2025 at 12:28 pm of medication Cart A, observation revealed one opened multiuse vial of lidocaine (a medication used to numb skin or tissue) without an opened date. Further observation…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-17 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, resident and staff interviews, and record review, the facility failed to maintain dignity for three of 41 sampled residents (R) (R27, R21, and R20). This deficient practice had the potential to place R27, R21, and R20 at risk of a diminished quality of life in an environment that promotes the maintenance or enhancement of each resident's quality of life. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for R21 revealed diagnoses, including but not limited to, cerebrovascular disease, aphasia following cerebral infarction, hemiplegia following cerebrovascular disease affecting left dominant side, and dysphagia. Observation on 7/15/2025 at 12:15 pm, during dining room service for lunch, revealed that the Activities Director offered R21 two spoons of food while standing over her. She then walked away to assist other residents. 2. Review of the medical record for R27 revealed diagnoses, including but not limited to, cerebral infarction, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebrovascular disease affecting the right dominant side, aphasia, dysphagia, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-17 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility policy titled Oxygen Administration, the facility failed to regulate the oxygen flow meter to the ordered flow rate for one of seven residents (R) (R23) receiving continuous oxygen. This deficient practice had the potential to place R23 at increased risk of respiratory complications. Findings include:Review of the facility policy titled Oxygen Administration, dated 8/2/2023, revealed the Policy section stated, It is the policy of [name of corporation] to provide oxygen safely and accurately to appropriate patients/residents. The Procedure section included, .4. Regulate liter flow to ordered/desired rate.Review of the Significant Change Minimal Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], revealed Section I (Active Diagnoses) documented diagnoses including, but not limited to, cerebrovascular disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and hypertension. Section O (Special Treatments, Procedures, and Programs) documented that R23 received…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-10-22 · tag F0568 — widespreadProperly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure money taken from the Resident Trust Account was accounted for and used for resident needs for 30 of 38 sampled residents (R) (R13, R14, R15, R11, R16, R17, R18, R19, R20, R21, R22, R12, R23, R24, R9, R25, R26, R27, R28, R29, R30, R31, R32, R33, R34, R4, R35, R36, R37, and R38). Findings included: A review of the Resident Statement Landscape dated 4/2/2024 and 4/23/2024 for R13 revealed a charge of $115.00 for personal items and shopping. This charge was credited back on 5/7/2024. A review of the Resident Statement Landscape dated 3/22/2024 for R14 revealed a charge of $100.00 for a personal needs item. This charge was credited back on 5/7/2024. A review of the Resident Statement Landscape dated 2/2/2024, 3/22/2024, 4/1/2024, and 4/8/2024 for R15 revealed a charge of $2521.00 for personal needs item, insurance premiums, and burial account. This charge was credited back on 5/7/2024. A review of the Resident Statement Landscape dated 2/25/2024, 2/28/2024, 3/22/2024, 3/25/2024, 4/2/2024, and 4/8/2024 for R11 revealed a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-10-22 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — widespreadProtect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record review, and review of the facility policy titled Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation, Mistreatment and Misappropriation of property, the facility failed to prevent misappropriation of residents funds for thirty of thirty-eight sampled residents (R) (R13, R14, R15, R11, R16, R17, R18, R19, R20, R21, R22, R12, R23, R24, R9, R25, R26, R27, R28, R29, R30, R31, R32, R33, R34, R4, R35, R36, R37, and R38). This failure had the potential to affect 30 to 45 residents whose funds were managed by the facility. Findings included: A review of a facility policy titled, Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation, Mistreatment and Misappropriation of property, with the reviewed date of 01/11/2024, revealed that Misappropriation of Resident's property means the deliberate misplacement, exploitation, or wrongful, temporary or permanent, use of a patient's belongings or money without the patient's consent. The facility's response upon knowledge of the alleged misappropriation of resident funds by the FC included: 1.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-02-25 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, and a review of the facility policy titled, Cleaning Procedure: Kitchen Area, the facility failed to ensure the exhaust hood filters were clean and free of dust; failed to label properly and date opened food items; failed to ensure the kitchen equipment was properly cleaned to prevent cross contamination; failed to ensure the ceiling was free from chipped and peeling sheetrock. This has the potential to affect 55 residents receiving an oral diet. Findings include: A review of the facility policy titled, Cleaning Procedure: Kitchen Area, It is the policy of [NAME] Health to maintain a clean and sanitary environment to prepare patient/resident meals, under walls, ceilings, floors, and vents -check walls, ceilings, floors, and vents for chipped and /or peeling paint, keep in good repair. Under oven - Wipe off oven spills and splatters as they occur. Dirty hood filters pose a potentially high fire hazard; therefore, cleaning hood filters must be part of a strictly enforced…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-02-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility's policy titled, Infection Control-Linen and Laundry, the facility failed to maintain an effective infection control program by failing to post COVID -19 (Coronavirus Disease) signage at the front exterior entrance to provide notification of active Covid in the facility. In addition, the facility failed to ensure infection control policies were followed during the handling, storage, and processing of linens. These failures had the potential to spread infection due to cross-contamination to 55 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Infection Control- Linen and Laundry, revised 11/30/2023 revealed it is the policy of all [NAME] Health Healthcare Centers to implement and adhere to the policy to mitigate or decrease infections cause by sources of microbial contamination through collection, handling, sorting, transportation, processing, and storage of laundry. 5. Laundry Process a.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-02-25 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — widespreadImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, staff interview, review of policy titled Infection Prevention and Control Program Surveillance Reporting and Antibiotic Stewardship Program the facility failed to provide evidence of a process for periodic review of antibiotic prescribing practices, and to document follow-up measures in response to the data for ten of twelve months of infection control data reviewed (February 2023 through January 2024). This had the potential to affect any resident who was prescribed an antibiotic. The facility census was 55residents. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Infection Prevention and Control Program Surveillance Reporting revised 11/30/2023 revealed: It is the policy of this facility to establish and maintain an Infection Control Program that includes detection, prevention, and control of the transmission of disease and infection among patients/residents and partners. Procedure: 1. Patient/resident infections cases are monitored and documented by the Infection Preventionist (IP). The IP review cases of infections, including tracking and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-02-25 · tag F0882 — widespreadDesignate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interviews and a review of the facility policy titled, Infection Prevention and Control Program Surveillance Reporting, the facility failed to ensure evidence that a qualified Infection Preventionist (IP) was serving in the position at the facility. This deficient practice had the potential for creating an ineffective infection prevention program that may contribute to the spread of infections for all residents in the facility. The census was 55 residents. Findings include: A review of the facility's policy titled Infection Prevention and Control Program Surveillance Reporting, revised 11/30/2023, revealed it is the facility's policy to establish and maintain and Infection Control Program that includes detection, prevention, and control of the transmission of disease and infection among patients/residents and partners. Definitions: Infection Preventionist (IP): The person designated to carry out the daily functions of the program. The IP is responsible for collecting, analyzing, and providing infection data and trends to staff. The IP is responsible for assuring…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-02-25 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — patternHonor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record review, resident and staff interviews and review of the facility policy titled, Grievances: Healthcare Centers, the facility failed to ensure resident grievances were addressed for residents attending the Resident Council Meetings and grievances filed through the facility grievance process. The facility census was 51 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Grievances: Healthcare Centers reviewed/revised 1/10/2024 revealed: It is the policy . to follow an established process whereby patients and/or other customers may have their grievances and complaints resolved in a prompt, reasonable, and consistent manner. All partners should take an active part in efforts to resolve grievances and complaints without discrimination or retaliation against a person filing a grievance or complaint. The Administrator of each healthcare center serves as its grievance official and is responsible for the following: overseeing the grievance process, receiving, and tracking grievances through the conclusion; leading necessary investigations; .issuing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 26 citations
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-25 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and staff interviews the facility failed to ensure residents' furniture was in good and functional condition related to one broken dresser drawer. The facility failed to ensure that it was maintained in a safe, clean and comfortable home-like environment in three of 13 rooms related to missing base boards, a hole in a closet door, and dust buildup on the filters of two packaged terminal air conditioner (PTAC) units. Finding include: Initial environmental observation rounds on 2/23/2024 starting at 8:31 am revealed: room [ROOM NUMBER]-PTAC unit noted with dust buildup on the filter. A 3-inch hole near the base on A bed closet door. Missing base board behind B bed and loose base board by bathroom door. room [ROOM NUMBER]-PTAC unit noted with dust buildup on the filter. room [ROOM NUMBER] shared dresser was missing the 3rd drawer front. Observation on 2/24/2024 at 9:00 am revealed: room [ROOM NUMBER]-PTAC unit noted with dust buildup on the filter. A 3-inch hole near the base on A bed closet…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-02-25 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff followed recipes for preparing pureed meals to avoid compromising the nutritive value of food items served to residents on a pureed diet when compared with items served to residents on a regular diet for seven of 55 residents receiving a pureed diet. Findings Include: Review of the lunch menu for 2/23/2024 revealed items which included baked lasagna, mashed potato Garlic bread and brownie. Observation on 2/23/2024 at 12:00 pm with the Dietary Manager (DM) of pureed food items revealed DM placing approximately 8oz (ounces) of lasagna and three slices of bread for seven residents into the food processor. The DM then placed an unmeasured amount of hot water she got from the sink into the food processor. She turned on the food processor. After approximately 30 seconds, the dietary manager checked the consistency of the bread/lasagna and added more unmeasured amount of water into the processor. She then turned on the food processor for approximately one minute and then placed the mixture in a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-25 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record review, and review of facility policies titled Influenza (Flu) Vaccinations for Health Care Center Residents, and Pneumococcal Vaccinations, the facility failed to provide evidence that two residents (R) (255 and 106) were offered the Influenza and Pneumococcal vaccine, and two residents (47 and 304) were administered the Influenza and Pneumococcal Vaccine after consenting to receive the vaccines. This deficient practice had the potential to put (R255), (R106), (R47), and (R304) at risk for contracting influenza and pneumococcal. Findings include: A review of the facility's policy titled Influenza (Flu) Vaccinations for Health Care Center Residents, with a revised date of [DATE]: All residents who have no medical contraindications to the vaccine will be offered the influenza vaccine annually to encourage and promote the benefits associated with vaccinations against influenza. Timing of Vaccination 1. Current and newly admitted residents will be offered the influenza vaccine beginning…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-25 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interviews, and a review of the facility policy titled admission Policy for Healthcare Centers, the facility failed to ensure that one of 36 residents (R) (50) sampled with a mental illness had a Level I Pre-admission Screening and Record Review completed prior to admission to determine the need for specialized services. Findings include: A review of the facility policy 'admission Policy for Healthcare Centers' last revised 1/4/2021 revealed: 'Collection of Paperwork-Prior to admission, the Admissions Director will obtain the following information and upload it to (name of electronic medical records). The upload will include all verification and be available for the financial counselor to validate the secured payment source: Copy of state specific PASSAR FORM.' R50 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including but not limited to moderate intellectual disabilities, anxiety disorder, and schizophrenia. A record review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-25 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, record review, and a review of the facility policy titled, Care Plans, the facility failed to follow a care plan for one of five residents (R) (28) reviewed for unnecessary medications. The deficient practice had the potential to cause R28 to not receive treatment and/or care according to their needs. Findings include: A review of the facility policy titled, Care Plan, with a revision date of 7/27/2023, revealed under admission Comprehensive Plan of Care: 4. The care plan approach serves as instructions for the patient/resident's care plan and provides continuity of care by all partners. Short and concise instructions, which can be understood by all partners, should be written and have a relationship to the problem and goal (s). Record review of the care plan for R28 revealed the resident had a plan of care developed for psychotropic drug use - resident receives antianxiety (Buspirone) medication due to a diagnosis of Anxiety. A review of the care plan interventions included attempting a gradual dose reduction if/as indicated. Record review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-25 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility's policy titled Physician Orders, the facility failed to follow physician orders for one of 36 sampled Residents (R) (R154). Specifically, the facility failed to transcribe the correct doses of Eliquis (a medication to treat and prevent blood clots) into the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) system and administer the medication as ordered. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Physician Order dated 7/19/2023 under the Policy Statement revealed Physician orders must be completed and legible when written by the physician, physician extender or transcribed by the licensed professional. Written orders for medications may be transcribed by a licensed professional nurse or licensed pharmacist. Faxed orders are considered to be original physician's orders. Under the section titled, Written Orders revealed 3. Any dose or order that appears to be inappropriate due to patient/resident's age, condition, or diagnosis should be verified…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-25 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility policy titled Monitoring of Antipsychotics, the facility failed to ensure one of five residents (R) (28) reviewed for unnecessary medications received medications as ordered. Specifically, the facility failed to decrease the dose of buspirone (an antianxiety medication) for R28 as ordered by the physician. Findings include: A review of facility policy titled Monitoring of Antipsychotics, revised 7/20/2020 revealed the Policy Statement: Patients/residents receive antipsychotic medications only when medically necessary. Every effort is made for patients/residents who use antipsychotics to receive the intended benefit of the medications and to minimize the unwanted effects of the antipsychotic medications. The Procedure section line numbered 6 stated: Gradual dose reduction is attempted with all patients/residents who receive antipsychotic medications. A review of R28's Face Sheet revealed the resident was admitted to the facility with a diagnosis including anxiety disorder and major depressive disorder. Record review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-25 · tag F0887 — isolatedEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews, record review, and a review of the facility policy titled COVID-19 Vaccination Clinics, the facility failed to offer and/or administer the COVID-19 vaccine to two of five residents (R) (255 and 106) reviewed for vaccines. Findings include: Review of facility's policy titled COVID-19 Vaccination Clinics, revision date [DATE]: All partners, residents, and patients who have no medical contraindications to the vaccine will be offered the updated COVID-19 vaccine per CDC recommendations to encourage and promote the benefits associated with the vaccinations against COVID-19. Administration 1. The patient or legal representative will sign the COVID-19 Vaccine Consent/Refusal Form indicating their wishes to receive or decline the vaccination. 2. All new admissions and new hires will be reviewed for consent or declination of vaccine to ensure previous doses of the vaccine have been documented, and new/next doses can be scheduled appropriately. 3. All residents and partners declining to be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2022-04-28 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespreadConduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on Facility Assessment Review and interview, it was determined the facility did not complete a Facility Assessment, creating the potential that the facility would not adequately evaluate the characteristics of their resident population, community resources, and risks; develop a plan to address these factors, and deploy their resources in the most effective manner to maintain safety and security for all facility residents. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all 40 residents in the facility. Findings include: Review of the Facility Assessment, provided by the Administrator at the beginning of the survey on 04/25/22, revealed: Resident Population Profile data from 04/25/21 through 04/25/22 which was a compilation of data extracted from Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments and included such information as the total number of admissions; average length of stay; functional abilities; diagnostic groups; residents receiving high-risk medications such as insulin and blood thinners; and basic demographic information such as race, gender, and age. Several areas which…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-04-28 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, review of facility procedure and record review, the facility failed to ensure that four residents (R) (16, 20, 28 and 32) reviewed for assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADL) in the sample of 20 residents, received assistance to maintain grooming and assistance with wearing the residents' personal clothing, shaving, and nail care. Findings include: A request for a policy and procedure for the provision of ADLs from the Administrator on 04/27/22 at 5:17 PM revealed the facility did not have a policy. Review of the facility's undated procedure titled, Hand Care - Clean, Cut, and File Fingernails revealed Allow the individual's fingers to soak for 5 to 10 minutes. Use soap if permitted by your organization and according to policy and Procedure . Softens thickened skin cells, fingernails, and debris beneath fingernails for easier cleaning .Clean beneath the fingernails (while the other hand is immersed) using the end of the plastic applicator stick; avoid using an orange…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-04-28 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — patternHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on document review, facility policy review and interview, the facility failed to provide evidence of Registered Nurse (RN) coverage in the facility at a minimum of eight hours a day, seven days a week for the period of February 5, 2022, through April 9, 2022. This absence of RN coverage could have a negative impact on all residents residing at the facility. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Staffing dated 06/01/17 revealed .At least one Administrator, onsite Manager, or a designated responsible staff person at least [AGE] years of age will be on the premises twenty-four (24) hours per day. The policy does not indicate that the facility must have a RN onsite eight hours per day. Review of the facility's documents titled, DAILY ASSIGNMENT/STAFFING FORM dated from 01/01/22 to 04/27/22 revealed there was lack of documentation of an RN being in the Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF) unit on duty a minimum of eight hours a day on 02/05/22, 02/12/22, 02/13/22, 02/26/22, 02/27/22, 03/14/22, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-04-28 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, policy review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that staff performed hand hygiene and disinfected resident equipment contaminated during and after providing a resident (R ) (13) fecal incontinence care. In addition, the facility failed to ensure that all staff were screened for COVID-19 prior to entrance into the facility to work, and that staff donned personal protective equipment (PPE) prior to entering the room of one of two residents (R197) sampled for transmission-based precautions (quarantined for COVID precautions). The facility census was 40. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Handwashing dated 07/27/20 revealed partners will clean their hands by either using soap and water or antiseptic hand sanitizer. Cleaning your hands reduces the spread of germs and decreases the spread of infections .When to perform Hand Hygiene .After contact with blood body fluids, excretions, mucus membranes, non-intact skin, or wound dressings .If your hands…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-04-28 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, document review and record review, it was determined the facility failed to provide a wheelchair for one of twenty sampled Residents (R) (R7). This failure created the potential that R7 would experience feelings of isolation and depression when she had no means to leave her room. Findings include: Review of R7's Face Sheet, located under the Face Sheet tab of her Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis quadriplegia. Review of R7's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 01/15/22 revealed she had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating that she was cognitively intact; did not reject care; was dependent on two staff persons for assistance with transfers from bed; had only transferred from bed once or twice in the past seven days; and had not come out of her room onto the unit during the previous seven days. An observation and interview with R7 on 04/05/22…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-04-28 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure three of six residents sampled (Resident (R)194, R23 and R28) for advance directives, electronic medical records (EMR) included advance directives (code status) physician orders' consistent with resident's wishes/ desires regarding life-sustaining treatment (CPR). The deficient practice had potential for the facility to provide or withhold (CPR) treatment inconsistent with residents wishes/desires for life-sustaining treatment. Findings include: The Advance Directive policy was requested from the facility however, the facility-provided the document. titled; Advance Directive Checklist Form dated 01/20 revealing a form for resident/family to complete to document wishes/desires for life-sustaining treatment. Review of the facility's policy titled, Do Not Resuscitate [DNR]policy: Georgia, Advance Directives, dated [DATE] revealed, .If upon admission or any time thereafter a patient/resident .requests or consents to a DNR…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-04-28 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, document review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the residents' environment was in good repair for two of twenty sampled Residents (R) (R7 and R18) . Findings include: 1. Observation of R7's room and interview with R7 on 04/25/22 at 11:37 AM revealed the built-in dresser along the wall across the room from her bed had gouges in the wooden faces of all three drawers, missing drawer pulls, and worn finishes at the corners of the drawers exposing particle board below. There was an area of damaged and mismatched tiles, two tiles wide by three tiles long on the floor, next to her bed. R7 stated that she had been moved out of this room several months ago on the pretense that the room needed to be remodeled. R7 stated, They came to me a couple of weeks ago and asked if I wanted to move back to this room. I agreed and was pretty excited because I knew it had been remodeled. When I got back here, I was very disappointed to see that it was in the same shape as when I left. I feel like they deceived me a little, but I don't know what can be done about it now.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-04-28 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide two of four Residents (R) (R26 and R30) and their representative information regarding bed holds when they were transferred to the hospital. Findings include: 1. Review of the Census tab of R26's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed she was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE], then hospitalized from [DATE] through 03/10/22. 2. Review of the Census tab of R30's EMR revealed she was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE], then hospitalized from [DATE] through 02/01/22. An interview with the Administrator on 04/26/22 at 2:14 PM revealed that the facility had not presented any of these residents and their representatives with bed hold information when they were hospitalized . The Administrator confirmed that he knew of the requirement to present bed hold information at the time of transfer to the hospital. The Administrator stated that it was his expectation that the facility would provide the bed hold document. A policy…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-04-28 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interviews, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure the residents' care plan was revised for one residents (R) (13) in the sample of 20 residents. Specifically, R13's care plan did not accurately reflect the resident's lack of compliance with the use of a splint for right upper extremity (RUE) contractures. Findings include: Review of R13's Face Sheet located under the Face sheet tab in the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed that R13 was admitted on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE]. Review of R13's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 02/07/22 located under the RAI tab in the EMR revealed R13 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 3/15 which indicated the resident has severe cognitive impairment. The MDS documented that R13 had a functional limitation in range of motion (ROM) on an upper extremity on one side. Review of R13's Care Plan located in the RAI tab of the EMR revealed on 06/24/21…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-04-28 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that one (Resident (R) 27) of 20 residents reviewed for quality of care received adequate bowel monitoring. Findings include: Review of R27's Face Sheet located under the Face sheet tab in the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed that R27 was admitted on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE]. Review of R27's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 03/25/22 located under the RAI tab in the EMR revealed R27 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 2/15 which indicated the resident has sever cognitive impairment. The MDS documented R27 was always incontinent of bowel and bladder. Review of R27's Care Plan located in the RAI tab in the EMR dated 09/03/21, R27 was identified as dependent upon staff to maintain care needs related to weakness, impaired mobility/contractures, incontinent of bowel and bladder, and impaired cognition/communication due to health conditions that included diagnoses of CVA…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-04-28 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, policy review and record review the facility failed to ensure that one resident (Resident (R) 13) of three residents reviewed for limited range of motion in the sample of 20 residents was provided planned restorative nursing services to prevent a further decrease in range of motion. R13 entered the facility for rehabilitation therapy for a new onset of right sided hemiparesis (weakness and/or inability to move) and was not provided planned restorative nursing services. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Restorative Nursing Program dated 11/04/21 revealed It is the policy of this healthcare center to provide restorative nursing which actively focuses on achieving and maintain optimal physical, mental, and psychological functioning and wellbeing of the patient/resident. Restorative nursing program is under the supervision of a Registered Nurse (RN), or a License Practical Nurse (LPN) and restorative nursing services are provided by Restorative Nursing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-04-28 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to assess for fall risk and implement fall prevention/interventions for two residents (R) (R193 and R26) sampled for accident hazards of 20 sampled residents. Findings include: Review of facility's policy titled Occurrence Reduction Program dated 11/21/17 revealed .healthcare center recognizes that due to the fragility of the patient/residents served, there is an increased risk of occurrences that may result in injury to the patient/resident .In an effort to prevent occurrences, each patient/resident will be assessed for risk and appropriate and realistic interventions will be implemented upon identification of risk and after a fall. These interventions will be included in the care plan .Admission/readmission: .All patient/residents will have a scored Fall Risk Observation Form Completed .will be assessed utilizing the Fall Risk Observation Form upon admission .develop an individualized fall care plan with appropriate…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-04-28 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure one Resident (R) (R30) had appropriate indication for ongoing use of a indwelling urinary catheter out of a total of four residents reviewed for catheter usage. Findings include: Review of R30's Face Sheet, located under the Face Sheet tab of her Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted from the hospital on [DATE] following a brief stay for a urinary tract infection (UTI) and dehydration. Review of R30's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 02/05/22, revealed she had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of four, indicating severely impaired cognition; and had no indwelling catheter. Review of R30's physician's orders, located under the Orders tab of the EMR, revealed an order for an indwelling urinary catheter beginning on 03/15/22 for a diagnosis of urinary retention. Further review of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-04-28 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record reviews and facility's policy review, the facility failed to ensure three residents reviewed for respiratory treatments (Resident (R)198, R195 and R28) in the sample of 20 had a physician's order for oxygen administration therapy (including flow rate, route of administration, monitoring, and oxygen equipment maintenance, changing oxygen tubing including labeling with date) prior to administration of oxygen administration therapy. Findings include: Review of facility's policy titled Oxygen Administration revised date of 11/01/19 revealed Oxygen will be administered by licensed personnel only when ordered by the physician, PA [physician assistant], NP [Nurse Practitioner] ., Regulate liter flow to ordered/desired flow rate .Change all oxygen tubing .The large external, black filter should be washed with soap and water once a week .clean exterior of concentrators weekly . 1. Review of R198's electronic medical record (EMR) under the tab Face Sheet, revealed R198 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-04-28 · tag F0700 — isolatedTry different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record reviews, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure two Residents (R) (R28 and R32) residents reviewed for siderails in the sample of 20, were accurately assessed for the use of the side rails, failed to obtain consents for the use of the side rails and failed to attempt alternative use of side rails prior to the use of side rails and failed to assess the resident for entrapment risks. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Bed Rails dated 02/01/18, revealed prior to installing or using bed rails on a patient's bed, the patient should be assessed by the admitting nursing and/or interdisplinary team (IDT) .the patient and/or the patient's representative should be educated on the proper use of bed rails as well as the risks of using bed rails, which should include, but not limited to, the risk of entrapment. The nurse should complete the initial/annual observation for physical device form in determining whether the bedrails should be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-04-28 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, facility policy review, and review of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines, the facility failed to offer three (Resident (R) 13, R31, and 39) of five residents reviewed for flu/pneumonia vaccinations and/or their representatives, the opportunity for the resident to be vaccinated in accordance with nationally recognized standards. The facility failed to offer R13 and/or their representative the opportunity to be vaccinated with Pneumococcal 15-valent Conjugate Vaccine (PCV15) or Prevnar 20 (PCV20) in accordance with nationally recognized standards. The facility failed to offer R31 and/or their representative the opportunity to be vaccinated with influenza and pneumococcal vaccination of PPV13 prior to 10/21/21 and/or PVC15 or PCV20 after 10/21/21. The facility failed to offer R39 and/or their representative the opportunity to be vaccinated with one dose of PCV 15 or PCV20 after 10/21/21. The facility failed to update their most current policies to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2024-02-25 · tag F0640 — widespreadEncode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure that the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were transmitted within 14 days of completion of to CMS's (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services) Quality Improvement Evaluation System (QIES) Assessment Submission and Processing (ASAP) system for eight residents (R ) (24, 29, 23, 35, 1, 12, 7, and 18) of 35 sampled residents. Findings include: 1. A review of R24 MDS list revealed a Quarterly MDS dated [DATE]. Further review revealed the MDS was completed but not transmitted. 2. A review of R29 MDS list revealed a Significant Change MDS dated [DATE]. Further review revealed that the MDS was completed but not transmitted. 3. A review of R23 MDS list revealed an Annual MDS dated [DATE]. Further review revealed that the MDS was completed but not transmitted. 4. A review of R35 MDS list revealed a Significant Change MDS dated [DATE]. Further review revealed that the MDS was completed but not transmitted. 5. A review of R1 MDS list revealed a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2024-02-25 · tag F0638 — patternAssure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interviews, and a review of facility policy titled MDS Assessment Accuracy, the facility failed to complete a Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment not less than every three months for three of 36 residents (R) (2, 21, and 43) of 36 sampled residents. Findings include: A review of facility policy titled 'MDS Assessment Accuracy' last revised 12/6/22 revealed: 'Procedure 2. ARDs (assessment reference dates) will be set as follows: .Quarterly Assessment (Non-Comprehensive) ARD must be no later than 92 calendar days from the previous OBRA Assessment of any type. Record review of MDS Assessments for R2 revealed that a Quarterly MDS Assessment was completed on 10/1/2023. No other assessments were completed after that date. Record review of MDS assessments for R21 revealed a Quarterly MDS dated [DATE] was started but not completed. R21 had a previous Quarterly MDS assessment completed on 10/13/2023. Record review of MDS assessments for R43 revealed a Quarterly MDS dated [DATE] was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to PRUITTHEALTH — 95 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 2.9 | -0.9 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.8 | -0.8 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 2.5 | -0.5 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 3.6 | +0.4 vs chain |
The other 94 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.9★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 94; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| BROWN, GEORGE | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | since 04/05/2022 |
| LANGFORD, JANICE | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | since 03/21/2022 |
| PRUITT, NEIL | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 09/27/2007 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 5 rows in the source record cover these 3 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 81% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.3M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 22% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in GA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Georgia Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 115529. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-07-17, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.