Christian City Rehabilitation Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

64.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 240 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 66.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 92 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.38 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 65% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 20% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 200 beds and averages 176.2 residents a day — about 88% occupied, or roughly 24 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.73 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.61 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.20 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.17 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.95 on weekdays — 20% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.67 to 0.46 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 40% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

25 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 15 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · D2025-11-21 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, family and staff interviews, record reviews, and review of the facility's policy titled Care Plans, the facility failed to follow the care plan for one of three sampled residents (R) R1 related to a two-person assist with transfers. This failure caused R1 to suffer a fall while being assisted by one staff member and placed the resident at risk of injury. Findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled, Care Plans last revised 10/21/2025, documented on page 3: the comprehensive care plan should describe the services to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being.Review of the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included but not limited to: Muscle weakness (generalized), Other abnormalities of gait and mobility, Body mass index [BMI] 45.0-49.9, other muscle spasm, and spinal stenosis of cervical region.Review of the most recent Quarterly Minimum…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-11-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on family and staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility's policy titled, Occurrences, the facility failed to provide assistance to prevent a fall for one of three sampled residents (R) (R1) assessed for falls. This deficient practice had the potential to cause injury to the resident. Findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled, Occurrences last revised on 11/17/2025 documented on page 1: Occurrence hazards are physical features in the healthcare center environment which may pose a risk to a patient/resident's safety, including but not limited to any event, accident, or incident, on or off healthcare center property which results in an injury or has the potential for an injury.Review of the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included but not limited to: Muscle weakness (generalized), Other abnormalities of gait and mobility, Body mass index [BMI] 45.0-49.9, other muscle spasm, and spinal stenosis of cervical…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-04-30 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, record reviews, and a review of the facility's policy, the facility failed to ensure medication was refilled before the medication ran out and over-the-counter medication was available for one of six residents (Residents (R) 129) observed during the medication administration and two residents (R436 and R98) out of a total of 51 sampled residents. This failure had the potential for adverse effects if medications were not administered due to a lack of timely refills or short supply. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Ordering Medications from the Pharmacy, revised [DATE], stated The healthcare center will transmit physician orders to the pharmacy using facsimile or other technology in order to receive medications on a timely basis. Facilities with EMAR: All orders will be entered into the system and transmitted to pharmacy. The policy under Reordered Medications (Refills) section stated some of the requirements as follows: Medication orders requiring…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-30 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident and staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the call devices used were tailored to meet the individual physical needs of the residents and failed to respond promptly to the call system for two residents, (Resident (R) 25 and R238), out of a sample of 51 residents. This failure placed R25 and R238 at risk of experiencing unmet care needs. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Nursing: Patient/Resident Rights, Accommodation of Needs, revised 12/02/23 stated, It is the policy of this healthcare center to promote and protect the rights of the patients/residents residing in the center. The call light system procedure included the following: .Essentia Points .Unless indicated in the care plan, each patient/resident, when in their room or in bed, must have the call light placed within reach at all times, regardless of staff assessment of patient/resident's ability to use it. When the patient/resident is in bed, the call bell should be…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-30 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, resident and staff interviews, and document review, the facility failed to create a homelike environment by ensuring resident rooms were clean or in good repair for four residents (Resident (R) 125, R106, R98, and R56) in the sample of 51 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility's undated admission Agreement revealed residents' rights: The Facility desires to provide the Resident with a homelike environment. 1. Observation on 04/27/25 at 10:50 AM of R125's room revealed the molding under the wall mounted air unit was peeled back with approximately 15 inches of it protruding into the room and exposing wood underneath. Paint was missing in spots around the bathroom door frame. During an interview on 04/27/25 at 10:50 AM, R125 reported the room did not look homelike. 2. Observation on 04/27/25 at 12:44 PM of R106's room revealed an area of the wall where the outer layer of drywall was missing in patches with the largest two areas measuring approximately six to eight inches by five inches. During an interview on 04/27/25 at 12:45 PM, R106 stated the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-30 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. Review of R197's undated Face Sheet located under the Resident tab of EMR revealed R197 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including acute respiratory failure and encounter for orthopedic aftercare, cognitive communication deficit. R197 was discharged to an assisted living facility on 04/09/24. Review of R197's Grievance/ Complaint Form: Health Center, dated 10/23/24, provided by the Administrator, documented there was a late grievance received by the facility Administrator on 10/23/24 after R197 was discharged on 04/09/24. The Grievance form documented the following: wound RP [responsible party] not informed. fall-p't [patient] trapped by male nurse. showers. feeding. weight lost. Resident RP reported issues to [R197's Insurance company name] .forward concerns to facility. Review of R197's Grievance/ Complaint Form: Health Center, dated 10/23/24 under the Summary documented the following: no male was assigned to Resident during stay. Res. (resident) did have fall on 4/21 from bed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-30 · tag F0637 — isolated
  Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews, record review, and review of Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services' Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI), the facility failed to complete a significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment following a decline in a resident's status for one of eight residents reviewed for a change in condition (Resident (R) 120) out of a total sample of 51 residents. This failure placed the residents at risk for unmet care needs. Findings include: Review of the RAI dated 10/01/24 and located at https://www.cms.gov/medicare/quality/nursing-home-improvement/resident-assessment-instrument-manual revealed a significant change in status MDS assessment must be completed when the IDT [interdisciplinary team] has determined that a resident meets the significant change guidelines for either major improvement or decline. A 'significant change' is a major decline or improvement in a resident's status that: 1. Will not normally resolve itself without intervention by staff or by…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-30 · tag F0640 — isolated
  Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews, record review, and review of Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services' Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual, the facility failed to complete a discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment within 14 days of a resident's discharge and submit it to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) system for two out of 51 sampled Residents (R) (R 131 and R154) reviewed for MDS completion. This failure prevented the transmission and compilation of resident-specific information for payment and quality measure purposes. Findings include: Review of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services' Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument RAI (Resident Assessment Instrument) Manual, dated 10/1/2024 and located at https://www.cms.gov/medicare/quality/nursing-home-improvement/resident-assessment-instrument-manual revealed discharge assessments were to be completed no later than the discharge date plus 14 calendar days. In addition, they were to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-30 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews, record review, review of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services' Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual and review of the facility's policy titled, MDS Assessment Accuracy, the facility failed to code pressure ulcers on a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for two of 11 Resident (R) (R194 and R98) reviewed for pressure ulcers. This had the potential to cause the residents to have unmet care needs. Findings include: Review of the RAI (Resident Assessment Instrument) Manual, dated 10/01/2024 and located at https://www.cms.gov/medicare/quality/nursing-home-improvement/resident-assessment-instrument-manual revealed . items on the assessment should be validated for accuracy (what the resident's actual status was during that observation period) by the IDT [interdisciplinary team] completing the assessment. Review of the facility's policy titled, MDS Assessment Accuracy revised 12/6/2022 revealed, Each ARD [Assessment Reference Date] will be chosen to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-30 · tag F0655 — isolated
  Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility's policy titled, Care Plans, the facility failed to ensure a baseline care plan was created within 48 hours of admission for one of 51 sampled Residents (R) (R192) reviewed for baseline care plan. This failure had the potential for the residents to have unmet care needs. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Care Plans dated 7/27/2023 revealed, Upon a new admission. A baseline care plan will be developed .The baseline care plan should be initiated in 24 hours and will be completed and implemented within 48 hours of admission. Review of R192's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) admission Record located under the Profile tab indicated R192 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of: Orthopedic aftercare following surgical amputation (amputation of Left Lower Leg), Type II Diabetes Mellitus (too much sugar in the blood) End Stage Renal Disease (a condition in which the kidneys lose the ability to remove waste and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to PRUITTHEALTH — 95 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 6 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $4.7M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 24% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in GA