Pruitthealth - Richmond, LLC

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

45.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 86 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 53.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 26 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.34 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 56% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 12% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 100 beds and averages 80.9 residents a day — about 81% occupied, or roughly 19 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.54 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.34 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.97 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.18 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.69 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.40 to 0.20 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 46% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

17 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 7 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · D2025-09-10 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure one of 65 sampled residents (R) (R22) was provided with a call device to accommodate their needs. This deficient practice had the potential to place R22 at risk of unmet care needs and a diminished quality of life. Findings include:Review of the electronic medical record (EMR) for R22 revealed an admission date of 11/9/2023 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, non-traumatic brain dysfunction, non-Alzheimer's dementia, and depression.Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for R22, dated 8/12/2025, revealed Section C (Cognitive Patterns) documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 14. Section GG (Functional Status and Abilities) documented that R22 had impairment on one side, was dependent for eating, oral hygiene, and personal hygiene. Review of the care plan for R22, dated 11/9/2023, revealed Problem areas of falls risk and vision deficit. Approaches included, but were not limited to, keeping the call light within reach. Observation and interview on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-04-28 · tag F0641 — widespread
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility's policy titled, MDS Assessment Accuracy, facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were completed and transmitted timely for 13 of 34 Residents (R), (R25, R63, R5, R57, R66, R53, R24, R59, R44, R8, R276, R279, and R22). Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, MDS Assessment Accuracy, dated 1/11/2024 Policy Statement revealed, It is the policy of this healthcare center that each Minimum Data Set (MDS) reflect the acuity and the medical status of each patient/resident in accordance with acceptable professional standards and practices. The assessment will be scheduled to accurately account for the acuity and complexity of the patient/resident. 1. Record review revealed the following: R25's admission date to the facility 8/30/2022. Record review showed at least one or more MDS 120 days late due to not completed/transmitted. R25's Quarterly Assessment was due 3/12/2024 and submitted late on 4/20/2024. R63's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-04-28 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, and review of the facility's policies titled, Labeling, Dating, and Storage and Cleaning schedule, the facility failed to ensure food items were properly labeled and dated. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure opened food items in the dry storage room were properly labeled and dated and to ensure that kitchen equipment used for food preparation was kept clean and sanitary. The deficient practice had the potential to affect 77 of 79 residents receiving an oral diet from the kitchen. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Labeling, Dating, and Storage revised 11/11/2022 under the Policy Statement revealed It is the policy of [Name] for all partners who assist in handling, preparing, serving, and storing food and beverage items to follow the proper procedures for labeling, dating, and storage to ensure proper food and safety. Under the section titled, Procedure revealed, Number one Food and beverage will have an identifying label as well as received…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-04-28 · tag F0851 — widespread
  Electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, staff interviews, and review of the Payroll Based Journal (PBJ) [NAME] Report for the first quarter (Q1) of Fiscal Year 2024, the facility failed to accurately report direct care staffing data to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS). The facility census was 79 residents. Findings include: Review of the PBJ [NAME] Report for October 1 through December 31, indicated as Q1, documented the following triggered metrics: One-Star Staffing Rating Excessively Low Weekend Staffing Interview on 4/27/2024 at 8:15 am with the Administrator revealed the facility recently had a change in management. She stated the Director of Partner Services at the corporate office submitted the staffing data that was retrieved from the time clock system. She stated salaried employees do not always clock in and out and that the agency staff were not clocking in and out through the facility time clock system until February of this year. She stated the agency staff, which included Registered Nurses (RNs), Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs), and Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) used…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-04-28 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — widespread
  Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility policies titled, Infection Prevention and Control Program Surveillance Reporting, and Antibiotic Stewardship Program the facility failed to provide evidence of a process for periodic review of antibiotic prescribing practices, and to document follow-up measures in response to the data for three of twelve months of infection control data reviewed (January 2024 through March 2024). The deficient practice had the potential to prevent an action plan from being developed related to identified infection concerns within the facility by the Infection Control Committee. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Infection Prevention and Control Program Surveillance Reporting revised 11/30/2023 revealed: It is the policy of this facility to establish and maintain an Infection Control Program that includes detection, prevention, and control of the transmission of disease and infection among patients/residents and partners. Under Procedure: 1. Patient/resident infections cases are monitored and documented by the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-04-28 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure that one of two medication carts on the Richmond Hall were locked and secured when not in use. The facility census was 79 residents. Findings Include: Observation on 4/27/2024 at 8:40 am revealed cart one on the Richmond Hall was observed unlocked and unattended with a plastic 30 Milliliter (ml) medicine cup with pills on top of the cart. The Electronic Health Record (EHR) was open, and the resident's information was visible on the computer screen. Continued observation on 4/27/2024 at 8:44 am revealed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) FF, returned to the medication cart and confirmed that he left the medication cart unlocked and unattended with a cup of pills on top of the cart and with the EHR information visible on the computer screen. During an interview with LPN FF on 4/27/2024 at 8:50 am, he stated that he normally does not leave the cart like that. LPN FF stated that he guesses he was a little nervous because the state was there. LPN FF thanked the surveyor for bringing the unlocked cart to his attention.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-04-28 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident and staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility's document titled, Patient's Rights, the facility failed to honor one of four sampled residents (R) (R26) the choice for scheduled times to be gotten out of bed to accommodate the preference of the resident. This failure had the potential to affect the resident's psycho-social being. Findings include: Review of an undated document titled, Patient Rights, provided by the facility revealed as a patient of the health care center, patients have the right to a dignified existence, self-determination, and communication with and access to persons and services inside and outside the health care center. Your Rights as a patient - Specifically: Patients are entitled to exercise their personal and legal rights and privileges to the fullest extent (sic) possible. Self-Determination - Residents have the right to self-determination, including but not limited to (sic) the following rights: a. To choose activities, schedules…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-04-28 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, staff interviews, and review of policy titled, Infection Control Housekeeping Services, the facility failed to ensure a safe, clean, and comfortable home-like environment on one of three halls (Richmond Hall), as evidence by a lingering malodorous smell throughout the hall. Findings: Review of the policy titled, Infection Control - Housekeeping Services, revised 10/16/2023, revealed it is the policy of this facility to ensure housekeeping services will be performed on a routine and consistent basis to ensure an orderly, sanitary, and comfortable environment. Review of the Pre-Survey Report dated 4/22/2024 revealed the urine odor was present in a large portion of the long-term hall (Richmond Hall) during visit. Observation on 4/26/2024 at 8:30 am tour of facility revealed call-lights answered in a timely manner. A strong stale lingering urine odor was noted on Richmond Hall. Staff observed in and out of resident's rooms providing morning care, answering call lights, and engaging with the residents. There were no containers for dirty clothes and linens in the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-04-28 · tag F0655 — isolated
  Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews, record review, and the facility policies titled, Care Plans and Discharge Planning, the facility failed to develop a baseline care plan which included essential components based on the resident stay for two of eight Residents (R), (R74 and R176). Specifically, the facility failed to ensure R74 had a baseline care plan developed after admission, and R176 had a care plan that addressed the residents' essential care needs as well as to develop a discharge care plan to include residents' goals leading up to discharge from the facility. Findings: Review of the facility policy titled, Discharge Planning review date 1/11/2024 under Procedure: 1. Discharge and care plan goals will be established with the IDT (Interdisciplinary Team), patient/resident, and patient/resident representative at the time of admission based on the patient/resident discharge goals and treatment preferences in conjunctions with needs as identified by the IDT. 2. Discharge Care plans will be updated after the Post…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-04-28 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility policy titled, Care Plans, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan to address nutrition, behaviors, and psychotropic medication use for one of five residents (R) (R276) and implement a discharge care plan for one of three residents (R126). The deficient practice had probability of R126 and R276 needs to not be meet by facility staff according to their individual care needs. Findings include: Review of policy titled Care Plans last revised 7/27/2023 revealed: under Policy Statement: It is the policy of the health care center for each patient/resident to have a person centered baseline care plan followed by a comprehensive care plan developed following completion of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) and Care Area Assessment (CAA) portions of the comprehensive assessment according to the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Manual and the patient/resident choice. Baseline Care Plan- Must include the minimum healthcare…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to PRUITTHEALTH — 95 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $72K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in GA