PruittHealth-Carolina Point

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

53.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 40 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 54.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 31 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.29 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 46% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 14% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 138 beds and averages 116.4 residents a day — about 84% occupied, or roughly 22 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.23 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.48 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.83 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.65 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.46 on weekdays — 23% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.53 to 0.35 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 58% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

18 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 6 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-03-13 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility video recording, record reviews, and interviews with staff, Nurse Practitioner, Medical Director and the resident's responsible party (RP), the facility failed to protect a cognitively impaired and vulnerable female resident's (Resident #2) right to be free from sexual abuse by a cognitively impaired male resident (Resident #1). On 3/2/25 at 2:50 AM, Nurse Aide (NA) #1 walked past Resident #1 in the hallway. Resident #1 was sitting in his wheelchair with no clothes on and only a towel covering his waist. NA #1 did not intervene and/or redirect the resident. On 3/2/25 at 3:18 AM, Nurse #1 observed Resident #1 on Resident #2's bed. Resident #1 was naked and was kneeling on the bed near the foot board, leaning forward and trying to place his left 2nd and 3rd fingers inside Resident #2's vagina. Resident #2 was lying on her back with a shirt covering her upper body and was not wearing a brief. Resident #2's RP stated Resident #2 must have felt trapped in her bed, may have been scared and was unable…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-04-18 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview of the staff and Police Officer #1, the facility failed to protect a cognitively impaired dependent resident (Resident #1) from sexual abuse by a cognitively intact resident (Resident #2). On 3/19/24 Resident #2 was found in Resident #1's room by Nursing Assistant #1. Resident #2 was observed fondling Resident #1's penis with skin to skin contact from his hand. Resident #1 was unable to stop the sexual abuse due to his limited ability to move and he was non-verbal/unable to call for help. Resident #1 was incapable of consenting to the sexual act and could not express an adverse psychosocial outcome. A reasonable person expects to be protected from abuse in their home environment and sexual abuse would cause emotional trauma. This deficient practice affected 1 of 3 residents reviewed for abuse. Immediate Jeopardy began on 3/19/24 when staff failed to protect Resident #1 from sexual abuse. Immediate jeopardy was removed on 4/10/24 when the facility implemented a credible…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-11 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  F812 -EBased on observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to label, date, seal and/or remove expired food items stored for use in 1 of 1 walk-in cooler, the dry goods storage room, and 1 of 1 of 1 walk-in freezer and failed to ensure food service equipment was clean. These practices had the potential to affect food being served to residents. The findings included:a. An initial tour was conducted with the Dietary Manager on 2/8/26 at 10:17 AM. Observations made at the time of the initial tour identified the following concerns in the walk-in cooler:- Two crates of chocolate milk cartons (48) with the expiration date 2/7/26 remained in the refrigerator to be served. One 5-pound plastic bag of partially used shredded cheddar cheese was observed left open to air (not sealed). The bag was dated as opened on 2/5/26. An interview with the Dietary Manager on 2/8/26 at 10:17 AM during the tour indicated that she was new to the position and was working to get the staff on track by ensuring dates were checked each morning before serving breakfast and removing expired items before…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-11 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide nail care for Resident #137 who required staff assistance for personal hygiene. This deficient practice affected 1 of 8 dependent residents reviewed for activities of daily living (Resident #137). The findings included:Resident #137 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of recent partial amputation of right little finger and right ring finger on 1/18/26, end stage renal disease, Type 2 diabetes mellitus, and cerebrovascular accident. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] showed Resident #137 was cognitively intact. He required substantial assistance for toileting hygiene and set up/clean up assistance with personal hygiene. Resident #137's care plan dated 2/6/26 had a focus for Activities of Daily Living self-care deficit with interventions that included check nails and ensure they are clean and have neat appearance and provide showers per schedule.During an observation and interview with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-11 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolated
  Provide appropriate foot care.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide podiatry services to 1 of 1 residents with diabetes who were reviewed for foot care (Resident #104). Findings included:Resident #104 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of type 2 diabetes with neuropathy, other circulatory complications, hemiplegia (loss of the use of the affected side of the body, and hemiparesis (weakness of the affected side of the body) following a nontraumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage (bleeding into the brain) affecting the left non-dominant side.The care plan dated 12/12/25 indicated impaired physical mobility and deconditioning related to recent hospitalization for hemiplegia, and a decline in activities of daily living related to stroke.The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated that Resident #104 had moderately impaired cognition and required substantial to maximum assistance with activities of daily living.Nurse's progress notes from…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-04-24 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — pattern
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews with the Medical Director, Nurse Practitioner (NP), Assistant Manager of Pharmacy Operations, residents and staff, the facility failed to have effective systems in place to ensure a twice a day dose of an antiseizure oral medication prescribed for the treatment of seizure was administered resulting in a seven-day delay of it being administered. Resident #1 did not change his condition. This occurred for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for significant medication error (Resident #1). Findings included: Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including seizure disorder and traumatic brain injury. Review of Resident 1's plan of care, dated [DATE], revealed he had a seizure disorder. The interventions included receiving medications as ordered. Record review of the physician's orders for Resident #1 revealed: [DATE] - Lacosamide (seizure medication), 200 mg (milligram), by mouth every 12 hours, Lacosamide 50 mg, by mouth every 12 hours, Levetiracetam (seizure…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-17 · tag F0641 — pattern
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews and staff interview the facility failed to accurately code the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments for Level II Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) for 4 of 7 residents reviewed for MDS accuracy (Resident #43, Resident # 45, Resident #58, and Resident #61). Findings included: 1. Resident #43 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of a comprehensive MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #43 had no cognitive impairment and was not coded for PASRR Level II or for Level II PASRR screening and conditions as required by the RAI manual (Resident Assessment Instrument). A letter dated 2/2/23 from the North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services Division of Mental Health, Developmental Disabilities and Substance Abuse Services to the facility revealed Resident #43 had been determined to require a Level II PASRR. An interview with the Case Mix Director conducted on 10/17/24 at 11:59 AM revealed the MDS assessments were coded inaccurately, or…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-17 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to maintain the dry goods storage area clean and failed to label and date food in one of one walk-in refrigerator. The facility also failed to ensure dietary staff facial hair coverings during food preparation in the kitchen. These practices had the potential to affect food served to residents. Findings included: 1. During an observation of the dry goods storage area on 10/14/24 at 9:15 AM, there was big white container with wheels. The white container had no lid. The was an opened paper bag inside the box. There was large amount white powdery substance on the floor, around and on the side of the white container. During an interview on 10/14/24 at 9:17 AM, the Dietary Manager indicated the white container contained sugar and added staff had accidentally dropped sugar on the floor during breakfast preparations. The Dietary Manager indicated the area should be cleaned immediately by the staff when any spills were made. 2. During an observation of the reach-in refrigerator on 10/14/24 at 9:20 AM, revealed there were three opened…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-17 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, family, Nurse Practitioner, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to notify the resident and the resident's Responsible Party of a medication change for 1 of 2 sampled residents (Resident #59). Findings included: Resident #59 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included stroke and atypical facial pain. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] assessed Resident #59 with intact cognition. Review of Resident #59's profile revealed his family member was listed as his Responsible Party (RP). A nursing progress note dated 10/15/24 and recorded as a late entry on 10/16/24 by Nurse #1 revealed Resident #59 complained of increased pain to the left side of his face. Nurse Practitioner (NP) #3 was notified and prescribed 20 milligrams (mg) of Prednisone (steroid) one time followed by 5mg of Prednisone daily for a duration of three days. Also, the acetaminophen order was changed from 325mg every 12 hours to 650mg every 6 hours. A physician order with a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-17 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to develop an individualized, person-centered activities of daily living (ADL) care plan that included how much staff assistance was needed to care for a resident who required total assistance with ADL for 1 of 8 sampled residents reviewed for ADL (Resident #49). Findings included: Resident #49 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included spondylosis, muscle weakness, lymphedema, and chronic pain syndrome. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #49 had intact cognition and required substantial to maximum assistance with toileting hygiene, personal hygiene, shower/bathing, upper/lower body dressing, putting on and taking off footwear, bed mobility, and transfers. Resident #49's comprehensive care plans, last revised on 7/23/24, did not include a plan that addressed her need for assistance with ADL. An interview with the MDS Coordinator #1 was conducted on 10/16/24 at 2:31 PM. She…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-17 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews with residents and staff, the facility failed to provide a resident with a cream gravy mix on her mechanical soft ground meats as specified on the meal ticket (Resident #68) and failed to provide food cut up into small pieces per the physicians order (Resident #22). This occurred for 2 of 2 sampled residents (Resident #68 and Resident #22). Findings included: 1. Resident #68 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dysphagia. Review of the physician's orders for Resident #68 dated 10/5/23 read in part, consistent carbohydrate (CCHO)/ liberalized diabetic diet, and mechanical soft consistency. A review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] marked as a quarterly assessment, revealed resident was assessed as severely cognitively impaired and was coded as receiving mechanically altered and therapeutic diet. During a dining observation and resident interview on 10/14/24 from 11:45 AM to 1:05 PM, Resident # 68 was observed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-18 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — isolated
  Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility's quality assurance (QA) process failed to implement, monitor, and revise as needed the action plan developed for the recertification/complaint investigation survey dated 7/13/22 in order to achieve and sustain compliance. This was for a recited deficiency from a complaint investigation survey on 4/9/24. The deficiency was in the area of abuse. The continued failure during federal surveys of record showed a pattern of the facility's inability to sustain an effective quality assurance program. The findings included: This tag is cross-referenced to: F600: Based on record review and interview of the staff and Police Officer #1, the facility failed to protect a cognitively impaired dependent resident (Resident #1) from sexual abuse by a cognitively intact resident (Resident #2). On 3/19/24 Resident #2 was found in Resident #1's room by Nursing Assistant #1. Resident #2 was observed fondling Resident #1's penis with skin to skin contact from his hand. Resident #1 was unable to stop the sexual abuse due to his limited ability to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$52,901 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

• $17,345 — penalty dated 2025-03-13
• $35,556 — penalty dated 2024-04-18

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to PRUITTHEALTH — 95 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 18 rows in the source record cover these 13 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

8 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $2.6M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 20% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NC