Pruitthealth - Brookhaven
3535 Ashton Woods Drive NE, Atlanta, GA 30319 · For profit - Corporation · 157 certified beds · (770) 451-0236 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0609) — most recent Aug 2023
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0568)
- inspectors cited 6 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (47) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
- about 28% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 4 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 7.6% | 15.3% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 3.9% | 5.6% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 1.1% | 0.9% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 2.6% | 2.5% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 5.4% | 11.3% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 0.3% | 3.2% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 3.4% | 15.2% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 18.2% | 20.5% | 18.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 95.0% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 8.7% | 5.6% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 10.1% | 15.8% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 18.2% | 19.9% | 17.1% | typical |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.4% | 2.6% | 1.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 98.5% | 78.4% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 21.0% | 25.0% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 12.9% | 11.6% | 12.0% | typical |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.09 | 2.15 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.30 | 1.90 | 1.80 | better |
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
61.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 170 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 74.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 47 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.38 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 64% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 26% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 61.2%CMS range 52.2–68.3 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | better than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 16.2%CMS range 12.7–20.2 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | worse than U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 74.5% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 76.6% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 63.8% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 97.3% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 94.9% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 1.3% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.4%CMS range 3.6–10.5 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.02 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 157 beds and averages 120.1 residents a day — about 76% occupied, or roughly 37 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.32 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.65 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.99 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.93 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.48 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.70 to 0.52 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 52% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
47 citations, most serious first. The 16 most serious are shown; the remaining 31 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2023-08-06 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interviews, and review of the facility policy titled Abuse Prevention and Reporting, the facility failed to protect one of five sampled residents (R) (R#1) from neglect during Activities of Daily Living (ADL) care. Specifically, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) BB was providing ADL care to R#1 unassisted, when R#1 fell out of bed, landing on her abdomen and chest for approximately 15 minutes before staff could reposition her. R#1 expired in the facility one hour post fall. On [DATE], it was determined that a situation in which the facility's noncompliance with one or more requirements of participation had the likelihood to cause serious injury, harm, impairment, or death to residents. The facility's Administrator and the Director of Nursing were informed of the Immediate Jeopardy on [DATE] at 3:07 p.m. The noncompliance related to the Immediate Jeopardy was determined to have existed on [DATE]. An Acceptable Removal Plan was received on [DATE]. Based on observation, record reviews,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2023-08-06 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interviews, and review of the policy titled Abuse Prevention and Reporting, the facility failed to report an incident to the State Survey Agency (SSA) in which R#1 fell out of bed resulting in her death in the facility. The sample size was five. On [DATE], it was determined that a situation in which the facility's noncompliance with one or more requirements of participation had the likelihood to cause serious injury, harm, impairment, or death to residents. The facility's Administrator and the Director of Nursing were informed of the Immediate Jeopardy on [DATE] at 3:07 p.m. The noncompliance related to the Immediate Jeopardy was determined to have existed on [DATE]. An Acceptable Removal Plan was received on [DATE]. Based on observation, record reviews, review of facility policies as outlined in the Removal Plan, and staff interviews, it was validated that the corrective plans and the immediacy of the deficient practice was removed on [DATE]. Findings include: Review of the policy titled…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2023-08-06 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interviews, and review of the policy titled Care Plan, the facility failed to develop and implement a person-centered comprehensive care plan for one resident (R) (R#1) that specified the need for two-person assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADL) care. The sample size was five. On 8/1/2023, it was determined that a situation in which the facility's noncompliance with one or more requirements of participation had the likelihood to cause serious injury, harm, impairment, or death to residents. The facility's Administrator and the Director of Nursing were informed of the Immediate Jeopardy on 8/1/2023 at 3:07 p.m. The noncompliance related to the Immediate Jeopardy was determined to have existed on 5/28/2023. An Acceptable Removal Plan was received on 8/5/2023. Based on observation, record reviews, review of facility policies as outlined in the Removal Plan, and staff interviews, it was validated that the corrective plans and the immediacy of the deficient practice was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2023-08-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interviews, and review of the policy titled Occurrences, the facility failed to provide adequate assistance for bed mobility for one of five residents (R) (R#1) reviewed for falls. Specifically, R#1 fell from the bed during ADL care on [DATE], resulting in death within one hour post fall. On [DATE], it was determined that a situation in which the facility's noncompliance with one or more requirements of participation had the likelihood to cause serious injury, harm, impairment, or death to residents. The facility's Administrator and the Director of Nursing were informed of the Immediate Jeopardy on [DATE] at 3:07 p.m. The noncompliance related to the Immediate Jeopardy was determined to have existed on [DATE]. An Acceptable Removal Plan was received on [DATE]. Based on observation, record reviews, review of facility policies as outlined in the Removal Plan, and staff interviews, it was validated that the corrective plans and the immediacy of the deficient practice was removed on [DATE].…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2023-08-06 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — isolatedAdminister the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, interviews, and review of the Administrator and Director of Health Services (DHS) job descriptions, the facility Administration failed to ensure one resident (R) (R#1) was free from neglect during Activities of Daily Living. This failure resulted in R#1 falling from the bed and expiring in the facility one hour post fall. The sample size was five. On 8/1/2023, it was determined that a situation in which the facility's noncompliance with one or more requirements of participation had the likelihood to cause serious injury, harm, impairment, or death to residents. The facility's Administrator and the Director of Nursing were informed of the Immediate Jeopardy on 8/1/2023 at 3:07 p.m. The noncompliance related to the Immediate Jeopardy was determined to have existed on 5/28/2023. An Acceptable Removal Plan was received on 8/5/2023. Based on observation, record reviews, review of facility policies as outlined in the Removal Plan, and staff interviews, it was validated that the corrective plans and the immediacy of the deficient practice was removed on 8/4/2023.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2023-08-06 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, facility documents, staff interviews, and review of 'Position Description', the facility failed to ensure licensed nursing staff accurately documented in the electronic medical records (EMR) the detailed events regarding the occurrence for one resident (R) (R#1) fall from bed during care, resulting in her death in the facility. Specifically, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) AA failed to thoroughly document the events related to the fall from bed, cardiopulmonary resuscitation, death, and release of body to the mortuary. The sample size was five. On [DATE], it was determined that a situation in which the facility's noncompliance with one or more requirements of participation had the likelihood to cause serious injury, harm, impairment, or death to residents. The facility's Administrator and the Director of Nursing were informed of the Immediate Jeopardy on [DATE] at 3:07 p.m. The noncompliance related to the Immediate Jeopardy was determined to have existed on [DATE]. An Acceptable Removal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-18 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interviews, and review of the facility's policy titled MDS Assessment Accuracy, the facility failed to ensure Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were coded accurately for 4 of 47 sampled residents (R) (R100, R12, R88, and R66). This deficient practice had the potential to place R100, R12, R88, and R66 at increased risk of not receiving care and services according to their needs. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled MDS Assessment Accuracy, dated 5/1/2006, revealed the Policy Statement included, It is the policy of this healthcare center that each Minimum Data Set (MDS) reflect the acuity and the medical status of each patient/resident in accordance with acceptable professional standards and practices. 1. Review of the Face Sheet for R100 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, bipolar disorder. Review of the Annual MDS for R100, dated 8/27/2025, revealed that Section A (Identification Information)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-18 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to submit a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) Level II for one of one resident (R) (R1) reviewed from a sample of 47 residents. This deficient practice had the potential to place R1 at increased risk for not receiving the necessary behavioral health services and support needed to meet R1's needs.Findings include: Review of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), major depressive disorder, and anxiety disorder. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for R1, dated 11/6/2025, revealed Section A (Identification Information) documented the resident was not currently considered by the State Level PASRR process to have a serious mental illness and/or intellectual disability or a related condition. Section C (Cognitive Patterns) documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-18 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record review, resident and staff interviews, and review of the facility policy titled, Care plan, the facility failed to follow approaches described in the care plan for one of 16 residents (R) (R69) receiving Restorative Nursing care. The deficient practice had the potential to place the resident at risk for medical complications, unmet needs, and a diminished quality of life.Findings include:Review of the facility policy titled Care Plans revised on 10/21/2025 revealed a policy statement of it is the policy of the health care center for each patient/resident to have a person centered baseline care plan followed by a comprehensive care plan developed following completion of the minimum data set (MDS) and Care area assessment (CAA) portions of the comprehensive assessment according to the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Manual and the patient/resident choice. The care plan approach serves as instructions for the patient/resident's care and provides continuity of care by all partners. short and concise instructions, which can be understood by all…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-18 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, staff and resident interviews, record review, and review of the policy titled, Restorative Nursing Program, the facility failed to provide services to maintain and or prevent further decrease in range of motion or mobility for one of 16 Residents (R) (R69) receiving Restorative Nursing care. The deficient practice had the potential to place the resident at risk for medical complications, unmet needs, and a diminished quality of life.Findings include:Review of the policy titled Restorative Nursing Program revised 11/4/2021 revealed a Policy Statement: it is the policy of this healthcare center to provide restorative nursing which actively focuses on achieving and maintain optimal physical mental and psychological functioning and wellbeing of the patient/resident. Restorative Nursing program is under the supervision of a Registered Nurse (RN) or a License Practical Nurse (LPN) and restorative nursing services are provided by Restorative Nursing Assistants (RNAs), Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) and other qualified staff. Nursing assistants/aides must be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-18 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident and staff interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of 47 sample resident's (R) (R41) food preferences/needs were being accommodated, specifically for food allergies.Findings include:Review of R41's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating little to no cognitive impairment.Review of R41's banner on the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed caffeine was listed as an allergy.Review of the care plan for R41 revealed caffeine was listed as an allergy.Review of the meal ticket for R41 revealed caffeine was listed as an allergy.During an observation and interview on 1/16/2026 at 12:00 pm with R41 stated the dietary department consistently gave her coffee and she was allergic to caffeine. She further stated she did not touch it and unclear why it was overlooked when it was printed on the meal ticket.An observation on 1/17/2026 at 9:14 am of R41 with her meal tray…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-07 · tag F0568 — isolatedProperly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident and staff interviews, record review and review of the facility's policy titled Resident Trust Fund Policy, the facility failed to provide a quarterly statement to seven residents (R) (R89, R50, R46, R108, R92, R20, R7) and the facility failed to employ proper bookkeeping techniques for two residents (R89 and R46) out of 65 sampled residents. This had the potential to affect residents with trust fund accounts managed by the facility, affect the residents' financial records and overall transparency, potentially leading to confusion or errors in their account balances. Findings Include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Resident Trust Fund Policy, revised on 6/4/2024 under the Policy Statement revealed, It is the policy of [Name of Organization] and its affiliated Healthcare Centers (collectively, the Organization to protect patients' funds in accordance with applicable regulatory guidelines, as addressed in the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1990 (OBRA) and relevant state policies.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-07 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility's policy titled Advance Beneficiary Notice of Noncoverage, the facility failed to provide the Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) to one of three residents (R) (R31) reviewed for Beneficiary Notification who remained in the facility and was discharged from Medicare Part A services. Findings include: Review of the facility's undated policy titled,Form Instructions Advance Beneficiary Notice of Noncoverage, under the section titled Overview revealed, they must complete the ABN as described below and deliver the notice to affected beneficiaries or their representative before providing the items or services that are the subject of the notice. The ABN must be delivered far enough in advance that the beneficiary or representative has time to consider the options and make an informed choice. Review of clinical records under Resident Census tab for R31 revealed on 5/2/2024 R31 was skilled Medicare part A and on 5/10/2024 a payer change was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-07 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide a safe environment as evidenced by loose wires were exposed unsecured in the room of one of 65 sampled residents (R) R50. The deficient practice had the potential to increase the risks of an accident. Findings include: Review of Electronic Medical Records (EMR) revealed, R50 was admitted with diagnoses that included but were not limited to muscle weakness, cognitive communication deficit, lack of coordination, ataxic gait, lack of physical exercise, dementia, repeated falls, and altered mental status. Review of R50's care plan dated 10/10/2024 revealed, a Problem Category: Falls, Patient/ resident at risk for falls related to fall on 5/9/2024 with Goal that patient/ resident will not sustain injury related to falling through next review; Approaches included but not limited to: assist with toileting and transfers prn, cue for safety awareness, keep environment safe, place call light within reach. Observation on 11/4/2024 at 1:45 pm revealed R50 sitting in wheelchair beside her bed. There were loose…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-07 · tag F0636 — isolatedAssess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were completed and submitted for one of three Residents (R) (R31) reviewed for Beneficiary Notification. Specifically, the facility failed to complete and submit a Part A Prospective Payment System (PPS) Discharge MDS assessment for R31. Findings include: Review of the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for R31 revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] and discharged from Medicare Part A Services on 5/10/2024. Review of MDS 3.0 Resident assessments for R31 dated 5/2/2024 revealed an entry assessment was completed and accepted. Further review revealed on 5/9/2024 an assessment coded as NPE (Nursing Home Part A PPS Discharge) was deleted. Interview on 11/6/2024 at 4:48 pm with the Registered Nurse (RN) Clinical Reimbursement Consultant CC verified and confirmed that there was not a Part A PPS Discharge Assessment completed for the last covered day of part A services on 5/10/2024. She verified…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-07 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and staff interviews the facility failed to screen one of two residents (R) R119 reviewed for Pre-admission Screening and Record Review (PASARR). This deficient practice had the potential to cause R119 to not receive care and services in the most integrated setting appropriate to his needs and have diminished quality of life. Findings include: Review of Electronic Medical Records (EMR) for R119 revealed, he was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included but not limited to Autistic Disorder (AD). Review of R119's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] for Section C (Cognitive Pattern) revealed, a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of three which indicated severe cognitive impairment, Section I (Active Diagnosis) revealed, Non-Traumatic Brain Dysfunction. Review of R119's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] for Section C (Cognitive Pattern) revealed, a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of three which indicated severe cognitive impairment, Section I (Active…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 31 citations
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-07 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews, record reviews, and review of the facility's policy titled Care Plans, the facility failed to develop a baseline care plan that addressed care and management for a PICC (peripherally inserted central catheter) line within 48 hours of admission for one of four residents (R) R542 reviewed with PICC lines. This deficient practice had the potential to increase the resident's risk of adverse health outcomes related to PICC lines. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Care Plan dated 12/31/1996 under the section titled, Procedure revealed, New admission Baseline Plan of Care 1. Upon a new admission, a baseline care plan will be developed by the attending nurse/nurses in conjunction with other Inter- Disciplinary Team (IDT), the patient, resident and or patient /resident representative. The baseline care plan should be initiated in 24 hours and will be completed and implemented within 48 hours of admission. 2. The Baseline Care Plan will be updated to reflect changes to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-07 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff and resident interviews, record reviews, and review of the facility's policy titled Care Plans, the facility failed to develop a resident centered care plan for one of five residents (R) R68 reviewed for unnecessary medication use, that included problem, goals or interventions related to diuretic use, and one of six residents (R101) for enteral feedings received through a gastrostomy tube (G-tube). In addition, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for one of four residents (R6) with a seizure disorder that included necessary seizure precautions, to ensure the resident's optimal physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. Findings include: Review of the policy titled Care Plans, with an effective date of 12/31/1996, under the Policy Statement revealed, It is the policy of the health care center for each resident to have a person-centered baseline care plan followed by a comprehensive care plan developed following the completion of the [NAME] Data Set (MDS) and Care Area…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-07 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to provide nail care for one of four residents (R) R101 reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADLs). Specifically, the facility failed to and trim R101's long fingernails on both hands and clean fingernails on his left hand. The deficient practice had to the potential to cause skin breakdown and infection to the palm of hands with contractures. Findings include: Review of the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for R101, revealed that he was with diagnoses that included but were not limited to cerebral infarction and contractures of right upper arm. Review of the care plans for resident R101 revealed that he has Activities of Daily Living (ADL) decline related to cardiovascular accident (CNA) with right sided hemiplegia, right arm contracture, sepsis, protein calorie malnutrition. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] for R101, Section GG (Functional Abilities and Goals) revealed, he was dependent for personal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-07 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolatedProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff and resident interviews, record review and review of the facility's policy titled Activities Program, the facility failed to provide an ongoing program of activities based on person-center activities for three of nine residents (R) (R92, R121, and R540) reviewed for activities whose primary language was non-English. Findings Include: Review of the facility's policy titled Activities Program, dated 9/28/2023 under the section titled Procedure revealed, 5. The programming should reflect cultural and ethnic interests of the resident. Review of records revealed the facility had nine residents whose primary language was non-English. 1. Review of the clinical records for R92 revealed she was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included but not limited to cerebral infarction, emphysema, unspecified, unspecified asthma, uncomplicated, pneumothorax, unspecified, muscle weakness, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, shortness of breath, chest pain, chronic obstructive pulmonary…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-07 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility's policy titled Medication Administration: Enteral Tubes, the facility failed to ensure that one of seven residents (R) R101 received enteral feedings, as ordered and to properly label and date the formula bottle, bags, and syringes used to provide the resident with needed nutrients. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Medication Administration: Enteral Tubes dated 1/30/2020 under the Policy Statement revealed, The healthcare center provides safe and effective administration of enteral formula and medications. Enteral formulas will be administered via feeding tube by the physician order following nursing assessment of the resident's condition and in consultation with the dietitian and consultant pharmacist . Review of the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for R101, revealed he was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included but were not limited to cerebral infarction, enterocolitis due to Clostridium…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-07 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident and staff interviews, and review of the facility's policy titled Oxygen Administration, the facility failed to follow physician orders for oxygen therapy for one of 19 residents (R) (R8) on oxygen therapy. In addition, the facility failed to change nebulizer equipment weekly and cover nebulizer masks when not in use for one of 19 residents (R539) on oxygen therapy. This deficient practice posed significant risks, including potential medical complications, unmet needs, and a diminished quality of life for the resident. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Oxygen Administration dated 8/2/2023 under the section titled Policy Statement revealed, It is the policy of [Name of Facility] Hospice and Healthcare Centers/Veteran Homes to provide oxygen safely and accurately to appropriate patients/residents. Under the section titled Procedure: revealed, Oxygen will be administered by licensed personnel only when ordered by the physician, PA or NP. The physician order may…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-07 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility's policy titled Labeling, Dating, and Storage, the facility failed to label dry goods and discard on or before the expiration date. In addition, the facility failed to label and store frozen food items in the freezer to ensure proper food safety and to maintain proper ice machine cleaning. The facility had a census of 119 residents that received an oral diet from the kitchen. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Labeling, Dating, and Storage, dated 11/11/2022 under the section titled Policy Statement revealed, It is the policy of [Name of Facility.] for all partners who assist in handling, preparing, serving, and storing food and beverage items to follow the proper procedures for labeling, dating, and storage to ensure proper food safety. Under the section titled, Scope revealed, This applies to all Dietary partners employed by [Name of Corporation.] Under the section titled Procedure revealed, 1. Food and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record review, facility document review, and review of facility policies titled P.I.C.C. (peripherally inserted central catheter) Catheter Dressing Change, P.I.C.C. Infusion Access Device Maintenance, and Infection Prevention-Hand Hygiene policy, the facility failed to follow infection control practices for three of 14 residents (R) (R549, R543 and R16). Specifically, the facility failed to ensure proper hand hygiene and physicians orders for dressing change were followed when providing care of the P.I.C.C. for (R549 and R543) and failed to follow procedure for catheter care for (R16). Findings include: Review of facility's Policy titled P.I.C.C. (peripherally inserted central catheter) Catheter Dressing Change revised 10/23/2024 documented Policy Statement: [Facility name] pharmacy services requires that PICC infusion access device site care must be established in order to observe infection control policies and procedures. The procedure should be completed once a week and PRN…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-07 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolatedMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and staff interviews the facility failed to provide a safe and comfortable environment for the residents, staff and the public as evidenced by an unpleasant odor on one hall (South Wing) of three halls. This deficient practice had the potential to cause diminished quality of life. The facility census was 128 residents. Findings include: Observations from 11/3/2024 through 11/7/2024 during survey revealed an unpleasant odor was present on the South Wing of the facility. Review of facility's documents revealed there was no evidence of a facility's policy regarding environment - free from unpleasant odors. Interview on 11/7/2024 at 11:26 am with Floor Technician WW revealed, he sweeped and vacuumed the hallways daily. He also stated he would apply liquid disinfectant on the carpet only if there was a stain on the carpet. Interview on 11/7/2027 at 11:35 am with the Housekeeping Supervisor, confirmed the South Wing hallway had an odor which could be due to the area having heavy wetters. Interview on 11/7/2024 at 11:36 am with Administrator, she confirmed there had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-06-04 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, staff interviews, and review of the policies titled Infection Prevention and Control Program Surveillance Reporting and Hand Hygiene and Contact Precaution Compliance and review of the RN/LPN Annual Skills Fair 2023, the facility failed to ensure infection control practices were maintained to prevent the potential for infections and cross contamination. Specifically, the infection control data for August 2023 was not analyzed for trends in urinary tract infections that include appropriate corrective actions and staff failed to wash/sanitize hands after glove removal and prior to donning clean gloves during wound care for one resident (R) (R34). The census was 110. Findings include: 1. Review of the facility policy titled Infection Prevention and Control Program Surveillance Reporting revised 11/30/2023 revealed the policy is to establish and maintain an Infection Control Program that includes detection, prevention, and control of the transmission of disease and infections…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-04 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and review of the policies titled Resident Rights and Daily Occupied Resident Room Cleaning, the facility failed to ensure it was maintained in a safe, clean, and comfortable home-like environment in nine resident rooms on two of three halls, including the common areas and the shower rooms and equipment used for showers. The census was 110. Findings include: Review of Resident Rights revealed under Safe Environment section revealed that residents have the right to a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment . Review of the policy titled Daily Occupied Resident Room Cleaning dated 10/23/2023, revealed that daily cleaning of resident's room should include sweeping the floors, damp mop floors, report any needed work orders for repair, and use disinfectant spray on surfaces. Observation on 4/30/24 at 9:50 am during initial tour of the facility revealed there was a strong malodorous odor upon entrance of building. Observation on 4/30/24 at 9:52 am, during tour of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-04 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — patternProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, staff and resident interviews, and review of the policy titled Activities Program, the facility failed to ensure an ongoing program of activities based on preferences for three of three residents (R) (R8, R35, R19) reviewed for activities. These residents were not provided with person-centered activities that would meet their individual needs. Findings include: Review of the policy titled Activities Program revised 9/28/2023, the policy statement revealed the center provides an ongoing program of activities designed to meet the physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident while offering a rich array of activities to the residents of the center. Procedure: Number 3. There shall be at least one different structured recreational activity provided daily each week that shall accommodate resident's needs/interests/capabilities as indicated in the care plan. Number 4. The facility posts a monthly schedule of planned activities for easy review in the center. This…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-06-04 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interviews, and a review of the facility policies titled Influenza (Flu) Vaccinations for Health Care Center Residents and Pneumococcal Vaccinations, the facility failed to ensure that five residents (R) (R8, R15, R16, R40, and R45) reviewed for vaccination status, received education, were offered, consented to receive, and/or refused the pneumococcal vaccination, of 44 sampled residents. Findings include: A review of the policy titled Influenza (Flu) Vaccinations for Health Care Center Residents, with a revision date of [DATE] revealed the following: * Current and newly admitted residents will be offered the influenza vaccine beginning on [DATE] of each year and it will be offered for as long as the influenza viruses are circulating, and the unexpired vaccine is available. * Residents admitted during the flu season will be offered the vaccine within two weeks of the resident's admission to the facility, if not previously vaccinated during the season. A review of the policy titled…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-04 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, interviews, and review of the facility's policy titled Medication Administration: General Guidelines, the facility failed to assess and determine if it was appropriate for one of eight sampled residents (R) (R36) to self-administer medications left at bedside. This failure placed the resident at risk for inappropriate and unsafe medication use. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Medication Administration: General Guidelines, dated 5/31/2023, Procedure: Number 3. Patients/residents are allowed to self-administer medications when specifically authorized by the attending physician and in accordance with procedures for self-administration of medications. Number 9. Only the licensed or legally authorized personnel that prepare a medication may administer it. Review of R36's clinical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including anxiety disorder, muscle weakness, lack of coordination, pain, diabetes, and mild vascular…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-04 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interviews, and review of facility policies titled Therapy Evaluations and Specialty Services: Dental Services, Vision Services, Podiatry Services, Hearing Services, and Mental Health, the facility failed to accommodate the needs for three of five sampled residents (R) (R15, R39 and R42). Specifically, R15 had order for durable medical equipment (DME) lift chair to accommodate her mobility with transfers to decrease pain; and failed to ensure R39 and R42 had transportation arrangements for follow-up for post-surgical appointments, resulting in need for rescheduling missed appointments. Findings include: Review of the policy titled Therapy Evaluations dated 3/9/2023, revealed the policy is that all physician's orders for therapy evaluations be addressed in a timely manner by Physical, Occupational and/or Speech therapy as designated by the physician. The evaluation will include discipline-specific findings related to the patient/resident's functional status and underlying impairment and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-04 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interviews, and review of the facility policy titled Grievances: Healthcare Centers, the facility failed to ensure prompt resolutions for residents' grievances regarding missing items. The census was 110. Findings Include: Review of the policy titled Grievances: Healthcare Centers, revised 1/10/2024, documented the policy is to follow an established process whereby patients and/or other customers may have their grievances and complaints resolved in a prompt, reasonable and consistent manner. A grievance includes complaints with respect to care and treatment that has been furnished to a patient, as well as that which has not been furnished, the behavior of staff and of other patients, and other concerns regarding the patient's facility stay. Procedure: Number 1. If the grievance is associated with a missing item, refer to the Missing Item Policy and associated forms. Number 5. The grievance/complaint should be resolved within three business days. Number 8. The Administrator will present…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-04 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interviews, and review of the facility's policy titled Prevention of Patient Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation, Mistreatment, and Misappropriation of Property, the facility failed to provide a complete and thorough investigation of allegations of abuse for two of three residents (R) (R10 and R44) reviewed. Findings included: A review of the facility's policy titled Prevention of Patient Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation, Mistreatment, and Misappropriation of Property, revealed that interviews should be conducted with all individuals who have relevant information, utilizing open-ended questions. Written signed statements from any involved parties should be obtained (and notarized. if necessary). Statements should be gathered from the following individuals: the suspect; the person(s) making accusation(s); the patient(s) involved; reliable patients who may have witnessed the incident; and any other persons who may have information. The policy continues to document that all investigative information…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-04 · tag F0637 — isolatedAssess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interviews, and reviews of the policy titled Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment Accuracy, the facility failed to ensure that a Significant Change MDS assessment was completed for one resident (R) (R8) who had been placed on Hospice services. The sample size was 44. Findings include: Review of the policy titled Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment Accuracy reviewed on 1/11/2024 revealed the policy is that each Minimum Data Set (MDS) reflect the acuity and the medical status of each resident in accordance with acceptable professional standards and practices. Significant Change in Status Assessment (Comprehensive) ARD (Assessment Reference Date) must be no later than the 14th calendar day after the determination of a significant change has been made. Review of the quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed that R8 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 15, indicating that the resident was cognitively intact. Review of the Physician's Orders for R8 indicated that resident had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-04 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interviews, and review of the policy titled Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment Accuracy Policy, the facility failed to ensure that resident's ethnicity and language needs were properly assessed on the MDS for one of one resident (R) (R6) reviewed. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment Accuracy Policy dated 12/6/2022 documented it is the policy of the healthcare center that each MDS reflect the acuity and the medical status of each patient/resident in accordance with acceptable professional standards and practices. The assessment will be scheduled to accurately account for the acuity and complexity of the patient/resident. Each Assessment Reference Date (ARD) will be chosen to capture services rendered and reflect an accurate clinical profile of each patient/resident. Review of the clinical record revealed R6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of bacterial infection, unspecified fracture of unspecified thoracic vertebra, cognitive communication deficit,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-04 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, policy review, interviews and review of Rule 410-10-.02 Standards of Practice for Licensed Practical Nurses, the facility failed to ensure that services were provided in accordance with professional standards of quality as evidenced by the failure to conduct weekly skin assessments to identify skin breakdown and provide treatments before pressure ulcer development for two of three sampled residents (R) (R26 and R20) reviewed for pressure ulcers. Findings include: Review of the Georgia Rule 410-10-.02 - Standards of Practice for Licensed Practical Nurses revealed that: (1) The practice of licensed practical nursing means the provision of care for compensation, under the supervision of a physician practicing medicine, a dentist practicing dentistry, a podiatrist practicing podiatry, or a registered nurse practicing nursing in accordance with applicable provisions of law. Such care shall relate to the promotion of health, the prevention of illness and injury, and the restoration and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-04 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, staff and resident interviews, the facility failed to provide activities of daily living (ADL) care for three of 10 residents (R) (R8, R35 and R27) reviewed for ADLs. Specifically, the facility failed to provide showers as scheduled for R8, R35, and R27. Findings include: Review of East Shower Schedule revealed showers were provided for residents on Mondays, Wednesdays, and Fridays from 7:00 am to 7:00 pm or from 7:00 pm to 7:00 am; and on Tuesdays, Thursdays, and Saturdays from 7:00 am to 7:00 pm or from 7:00 pm to 7:00 am. 1. Review of R8's admission Record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including rhabdomyolysis, type 2 diabetes mellitus with ketoacidosis with coma, hypotension, muscle weakness, cerebellar ataxia, unspecified fall, dysarthria and anarthria, degenerative disease of nervous system, and morbid (severe) obesity due to excess calories. Review of R8's care plan revealed the resident was not care planned for bathing preferences.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-04 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interviews, and review of the policy titled Documentation of Skin and Wound Care, facility failed to perform weekly skin assessments to identify potential skin breakdown, and implement interventions in a timely manner to prevent unavoidable pressure ulcers, for two of three residents (R) (R26 and R20) reviewed for pressure ulcers. Findings include: Review of the policy titled Documentation of Skin and Wound Care dated [DATE] revealed the policy is to provide current and timely documentation of residents condition related to skin/wound care, accurate information on residents status as it pertains to skin and interventions in place and provide detailed history of the wound assessments that have occurred in the healthcare center. Procedure: Number 1. Documentation regarding wound observations should be completed on pressure ulcers Diabetic wounds and any chronic or complex wounds (weekly) on admission or re-admissions. 1. Review of the clinical record revealed R26 was admitted to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-04 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview, and review of the policy titled Restorative Nursing Program and Therapy Evaluations, the facility failed to provide restorative therapy services to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well- being for two of four residents (R) (R19 and R27) reviewed who were referred for Restorative Therapy Services. Findings include: Review of the policy titled Restorative Nursing Program dated 11/4/2021 revealed that it is the policy of the facility to provide restorative nursing to the residents to maintain optimal physical, mental, and psychological functioning and well-being. Restorative nursing services are provided by qualified staff that are been trained to do such services. The nurse will complete a restorative care screening tool, determine the appropriate restorative needs and develop a care plan for each restorative service and review the resident's progress to determine discharge from the program. Review of the facilities policy…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-04 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interviews, and review of the policy titled Weight Monitoring Program, the facility failed to provide care and services to maintain an acceptable parameter for the nutritional status for one resident (R) (R26), resulting in a 7.82% weight loss in The sample size was 44 residents. Findings include: Review of the policy titled Weight Monitoring Program dated 6/2/2023 documented the weight frequency for new admissions will be weighed weekly times four weeks and/or until weight is stable. A significant weight change is defined as: 5 percent (%) weight Loss or gain in one month; a 7.5% weight Loss or gain in three months; and a 10% weight Loss or gain in six months. Patients/residents will be placed on the Weight Monitoring Program unless the weight loss is anticipated and/or planned. Patients/residents placed on the weight monitoring program will be weighed weekly. Patients/residents with a planned/anticipated weight loss will have documentation of awareness of weight loss and a notation…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-04 · tag F0826 — isolatedProvide specialized rehabilitative services by qualified personnel, when ordered for a resident by a doctor.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interviews, and review of the policy titled Therapy Evaluations, the facility failed to evaluate a therapy recommendation per two different physician's order for one of three sampled residents (R) (R15) related to providing a Durable Medical Equipment (DME) lift chair. Findings include: Review of the policy titled Therapy Evaluations dated 3/9/2023, revealed the policy is that all physician's orders for therapy evaluations be addressed in a timely manner by Physical, Occupational and/or Speech therapy as designated by the physician. The evaluation will include discipline-specific findings related to the patient/resident's functional status and underlying impairment and prior functional level. Procedure: Number 11. All therapy recommendations will be reviewed with the patient, family/caregiver and the Nursing Department, and subsequent training will be documented and recorded indicating the training components and understanding and competence with the instructions provided. Review of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-04 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — isolatedConduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews and a review of the facility's documents titled, Facility Assessment [name of facility] and Facility Assessment [name of facility] 2024, the facility failed to determine its capacity and capability of the clinical staff to provide the necessary care and services for one of 43 sampled residents (R) (R10). Specifically, R10 wore an external cardiac defibrillator, and facility did not have staff educated on how to care for a resident with an external defibrillator. Findings include: Review of the facility provided Facility Assessment [name of facility], revealed the facility assessment did not include a section addressing cardiac services. A review of the facility provided Facility Assessment [name of facility] 2024 revealed a sufficiency analysis category for heart/circulation. Review of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed R10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including cerebral infarction, dysphagia, anemia, acute myocardial infarction, atherosclerotic heart…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-04 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolatedMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that the call light communication system was functioning adequately to allow residents to call for staff assistance for five of 27 sampled residents (R) (R28, R30, R31, R35, R38). Findings include: 1. Review of the clinical record for R28 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including hypergammaglobulinemia, shortness of breath, depression, hypertension, muscle weakness, and glaucoma. Review of the admission Minimum Set Data (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11, indicating moderate cognitive impairment. The resident had impairment to upper and lower extremities and required maximum assistance with ADL's. R28 was always incontinent of bowel and bladder. Observation on 5/2/2024 at 3:30 pm, revealed R28's call light was noted to be unplugged from the wall. The call light was pushed by the surveyor, and it did not come on. Observation and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-04 · tag F0940 — failed to train staff — isolatedDevelop, implement, and/or maintain an effective training program for all new and existing staff members.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure that clinical staff were educated related to the use of a wearable cardioverter defibrillator (WCD) for one of 43 sampled residents (R)(R10). This failure had the potential to place R10 at risk of not receiving necessary care and monitoring for cardiac instability. Findings include: Review of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed that R10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including cerebral infarction, acute myocardial infarction, atherosclerotic heart disease, chronic atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter, ischemic cardiomyopathy, and end-stage renal disease. Resident was admitted with a WCD. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed that R10 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11, indicating moderate cognitive impairment. Review of the Physician's Order revealed an order dated 7/18/2023 to change battery daily for resident's wearable cardioverter…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-06-16 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — patternDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure the outdoor garbage and refuse area was maintained in a sanitary manner and failed to ensure the areas surrounding the dumpsters were free of trash debris for two of two dumpsters. Findings include: Observation of the dumpster area on 6/13/21 at 10:55 a.m., revealed several large clear bags of garbage on the top of both dumpsters. The dumpster on the left side closest to the fence had two visible large clear bags filled with trash on the pavement directly in front of the dumpster. Observation of the dumpster area on 6/15/22 at 10:05 a.m., with the Maintenance Director and Administrator, revealed there were several bags of garbage laying on the top of both dumpsters. Further observation revealed two large clear bags of trash on the ground directly placed in front of the dumpster on the left. During a follow up interview on 6/15/22 at 10:06 a.m. with the Administrator and the Maintenance Director confirmed the trash dumpsters were overflowing, and there should not be trash laying on the ground. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-06-16 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, observations and interviews, the facility failed to develop the appropriate interventions to treat and prevent the development of additional pressures ulcers for one resident (R) (R#104) out of 36 sampled residents. Findings Include: Review of the clinical record revealed that R#104 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including but not limited to diabetes mellitus, dementia, thrombocytopenia, dysphagia, gastrostomy, and gastroesophageal reflux disease. Review of R#104's care plan revealed a care plan that stated, At risk for skin breakdown r/t (related to) bowel obstruction, atrial fibrillation, acute kidney failure, fecal impaction, dementia history of urinary tract infections, dysphagia, vitamin D deficiency, Alzheimer's, major depression, insomnia actual breakdown sacrum. The care plan did not reveal evidence of preventative wound care approaches or goals such as check for incontinence on rounds and provide perineal care as needed, turn, and reposition, or a pressure…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-06-16 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, and review of facility policies titled, Controlled Substances for Healthcare Centers, Automated Drug Cabinet, and Ordering Medications from the Pharmacy, the facility failed to follow the physician orders for two residents (R) (R#65 and R#724) related to the administration of scheduled medication for two out of two residents The sample size was 36. Review of a procedure titled Medication Administration undated, revealed 17. Ensure medications are given within one hour prior to or after time ordered. 22. Demonstrate proper action to take if medication not taken or given either by refusal/unavailable medication or other contraindications. Review of a policy titled Controlled Substances for Healthcare Centers revised 4/28/21, revealed 3. Prescriptions for medication in controlled substances schedules III-V (Lyrica is scheduled V) may be verbally authorized by the physician contacting the pharmacist directly. The pharmacist will reduce the oral authorization to writing with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to PRUITTHEALTH — 95 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 2.9 | -0.9 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 2.8 | -1.8 vs chain |
| Staffing | 1 of 5 | 2.5 | -1.5 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 3.6 | +1.4 vs chain |
The other 94 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.9★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 94; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| WOEBBKING, LORRIE | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | since 11/04/2019 |
| PRUITT, NEIL | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER | since 09/19/2007 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 3 rows in the source record cover these 2 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $4.6M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 28% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in GA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Georgia Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 115313. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-01-18, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.