The Lilac At Silver Palms

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

39.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 147 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 41.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 95 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.49 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 80% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 17% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 104 beds and averages 97.9 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.44 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.75 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.07 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.11 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.57 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.78 to 0.67 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 33% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

25 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 14 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2023-09-14 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one (Resident #13) out of 16 sampled residents was not verbally abused by facility staff. The findings included: Record review of the facility's Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation Policy and Procedure dated 10/1/2022 included, Policy: It is the policy of this facility to provide protections for the health, welfare and rights of each resident by developing and implementing written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, exploitation and misappropriation of resident property. Definitions: Verbal Abuse - means the use of oral, written or gestured communication or sounds that willfully includes disparaging and derogatory terms to residents or their families, or within their hearing distance regardless of their age, ability to comprehend or disability. III. Prevention of Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation - The facility will implement policies and procedures to prevent and prohibit all types of abuse, neglect,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-20 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure medications and biologics were properly stored in two out of two medication rooms (First floor and Second floor medication rooms). As evidenced by: Expired saline and sterile water on the second-floor treatment cart, eye drops observed at Resident # 5's bedside; ointment and medications observed in residents' rooms at bedside (Resident #7, Resident # 15, Resident #31, Resident #60, Resident #76 and Resident #108). Expired Intravenous (IV) start kits and alcohol pads found in the first-floor medication room, expired liquid Lansoprazole for Resident#4 in the second-floor medication room and expired insulin for Resident # 68 found in the first-floor medication cart. There were 94 residents residing in the facility at the time of the survey. The findings include. Resident # 31 Observation on 02/17/2026 at 10:08 AM in Resident # 31's room revealed lanolin-petrolatum ointment (A&D ointment) on top of the resident's dresser. (Photo…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-20 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to honor residents right to a dignified experience for one (Resident #29) out of one sampled resident with an indwelling cholecystostomy drainage device as evidenced by observation of Resident # 29 receiving physical therapy and the cholecystostomy drainage collection bag was not inside a privacy bag and visible. There was one resident with a cholecystostomy drainage device residing in the facility at the time of survey. The findings included: Observation on 02/18/2026 at 10:27 AM, revealed Resident #29 self-propelling in wheelchair on the 2nd floor hallway towards the therapy room. A cholecystostomy drainage bag was visible (photo). On 02/18/2026 at 10:30 AM Resident # 29 was observed being assisted with ambulation using a walker by the Physical Therapist and Staff D, Occupational therapy assistant. Resident # 29's cholecystostomy drainage bag was visible. On 02/18/2026 at 10:35 AM, Staff B, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) was made aware…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-20 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
  Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to protect residents' personal information on one out of four medication carts as evidenced by: 1) facility's staff left paperwork with residents' personal medical information unattended on top of medication cart. 2) Facility's staff failed to close a computer screen before walking away and resident information visible on the second-floor nursing unit. There were three nursing units in the facility at the time of survey. The findings included:Observation on 02/19/2026 at 10:32 AM on the facility's second-floor south unit revealed an unattended medication cart with paperwork that contained residents' personal information visible (photo). On 02/19/2026 at 10:34 AM Staff J, Registered Nurse (RN) exited a room and approached the medication cart and was made aware of the identified concern. Staff J, RN stated: We keep resident's information private by closing our computer screens and shredding documents. This paperwork shouldn't be on top of cart and should have been shredded.On 02/19/2026 at 2:45 PM the Director…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-20 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for one (Resident #68) out of one sampled resident receiving insulin injections as evidenced by documentation indicating expired insulin found on the first-floor medication cart was administered to Resident # 68. The findings included: Observation and interview on 02/18/2026 at 12:30 PM during a medication cart inspection conducted on the facility's first floor with Staff E, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) revealed an insulin pen (Admelog solo injection) labeled with Resident #68's name with open date 01/15/26 and expiration date 2/13/26 stored in the medication cart (photo). Staff E, LPN stated: According to the date on the pen it is expired. Review of Resident # 68's electronic medication administration record revealed the Admelog solo injection was last administered on 02/17/2026 at 5:36 PM by Staff E, LPN (photo). Staff E, LPN was asked about the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure an environment free of accident hazards as evidenced by razor observed in Resident #7's room, 2) Resident #107 observed with heating pad; 3) Overfilled sharps container in Resident #29's room and 4) Unsecured door with interior lock on second floor south hallway. There were 94 residents residing in the facility at the time of the survey.The findings included. 1) On 02/17/2026 at 9:49 AM, observation revealed Resident # 7 in bed alert there was a shaving razor on the shelf. Photo evidence was obtained. On 02/18/2026 at 10:58 AM, observation revealed a razor on the shelf in Resident #7'ss room. On 02/19/2026 at 11:25 AM, Resident # 7 was in therapy and the razor remained on the shelf in the resident's room. Photo evidence was obtained. Record review revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including Acute on Chronic Systolic (Congestive) Heart Failure. Review of Resident #7's admission Minimum Data Set, dated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-20 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to properly position indwelling urinary catheter's tubing in a manner to promote free flow of urine for two ( Resident #29 and Resident #76) of two sampled residents with an indwelling urinary catheter as evidenced by: 1)Resident # 29's indwelling urinary tubing observed extending down and up through pants with urine in the tubing. 2) Resident # 76's indwelling urinary catheter tubing observed coiled with urine in the tubing. This deficient practice prevented urine from freely flowing, increasing the risk for catheter-associated urinary tract infections and other serious medical issues.The findings included: Resident #76Observation on 02/17/2026 at 10:09 AM revealed Resident # 76 in bed, the indwelling urinary catheter tubing was looped and contained urine; there was less than 5 milliliters (mL) of urine in the drainage bag.On 02/17/2026 at 10:11 AM, the second-floor charge LPN was made aware and repositioned catheter tubing to allow the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-20 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews and record review the facility failed to store food under sanitary condition and to ensure resident's food items were dated and labeled in the nourishment refrigerator on the Second Floor North Wing. This has the potential to affect 31 out of 35 residents who eat orally residing on the Second Floor North Wing out of 94 residents in the facility at the time of the survey.The findings included: Record review of the Use and Storage of Food Brought by Family or Visitors Policy and Procedure (revision date March 20223); Policy Statement-It is the right of the residents of this facility to have food brought in by family or other visitors, however, the food must be handled in a way to ensure the safety of the resident; Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: 2) All food items that are already prepared by the family or visitor brought in must be labeled with content and dated and a) The facility may refrigerate labeled and dated prepared items in the nourishment refrigerator.Observation of the nourishment refrigerator on the Second Floor North Wing…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-20 · tag F0849 — isolated
  Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to collaborate and coordinate with hospice representative for one (#5) out of one sampled resident receiving hospice services as evidenced by: facility staff failed to obtain and keep nursing notes in the hospice folder for Resident#5 since December 2025 when Resident started with hospice. There were seven residents receiving hospice care residing in the facility at the time of survey. The findings included:On 02/19/26 at 1:00 PM Resident#5 was in bed with eyes closed and call light in reach. Oxygen was in progress at 2 Liters per minute, no apparent distress.Record review of Resident #5's clinical records revealed Resident #5 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis that included but not limited to: Encounter for Palliative Care and Heart Failure.Record review of a significant change in status minimum data set reference dated 12/12/25 indicated Resident #5 has moderate cognitive impairment and receiving hospice care.Record review of a care…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-20 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — isolated
  Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to demonstrate effective plans of action were implemented to correctly identify repeated deficient practices in the problem areas of F880 Infection Prevention & Control, F689 Free of Accident hazards/Supervision/Devices, and F761Medication Storage. These deficient practices have the potential to affect 168 residents residing in the facility at the time of the survey. The findings included: Record review of the facility's Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement policy and procedure dated 1/2026 indicated: These policies are intended to ensure the facility develops a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI/QAA activities, such as identifying and correcting quality deficiencies as well as opportunities for improvement, which will lead to improvement in the lives of nursing home residents, through continuous attention to quality of care, quality of life, and resident safety.Policy: The facility, will develop, implement, and maintain an effective, comprehensive, data-driven QAPI program that focuses on indicators…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to follow infection control protocol when storing medical equipment for two (#38, #46) out of two sampled residents as evidenced by: 1) Observation of an incentive spirometer not stored in a dated plastic bag. 2) Observation of an enteral syringe dated 2/16/26 stored at the bedside of Resident#46 for two days. There were 94 residents residing in the facility at the time of survey. The findings included: Resident #38Observation on 02/17/2026 at 8:25 AM revealed an uncovered incentive spirometer stored at Resident #38's bedside.Record review Resident#38's clinical records indicated the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis that included but not limited to: Cerebral Ischemia.Record review of a Modification of interim payment minimum data set (MDS) reference dated 12/22/25 revealed Resident #38 had no cognitive impairment and received respiratory therapy for seven days.Record review of a care plan initiated: 12/13/2025 revised:…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$35,500 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $35,500 — penalty dated 2023-09-14

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to SIMCHA HYMAN & NAFTALI ZANZIPER — 79 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $3.0M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 36% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in FL