Pruitthealth - Athens Heritage

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

65.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 153 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 66.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 27 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.35 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 59% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 24% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 104 beds and averages 87.7 residents a day — about 84% occupied, or roughly 16 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.43 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.74 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.79 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.79 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.69 on weekdays — 24% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.87 to 0.44 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 50% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

30 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 19 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2024-01-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interviews, and review of the policy titled Occurrence Reduction Program, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to prevent accidents for one of three sampled residents (R) (R1). Actual harm occurred on 12/29/2022, when R1 fell out of bed and suffered a compression fracture of T2/T3 vertebrae, a laceration on her forehead which required sutures, skin tears and multiple bruises to bilateral upper extremities. Findings include: Review of the policy titled Occurrence Reduction Program reviewed 12/9/2021, revealed the policy documents in an effort to prevent occurrences, each patient/resident will be assessed for risk and appropriate and realistic interventions will be implement upon identification of risk and after a fall. These interventions will be included in the care plan. Review of the clinical record revealed R was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including morbid obesity, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), chronic kidney disease, major…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-04 · tag F0554 — isolated
  Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, resident and staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility policy titled Self-Administration of Medications by Patients/Residents, the facility failed to ensure unauthorized and unsecured medications were not left at the bedside for two of 41 sampled residents (R) (R17 and R86). This deficient practice had the potential to place R17 and R86 at risk of medical complications related to unauthorized medication use. Findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled Self-Administration of Medications by Patients/Residents, revised 1/28/2020, revealed the Procedure section included . 6. All nurses and aides are required to report to the Charge Nurse on duty any medications found at the bedside not authorized for bedside storage and to give unauthorized medications to the Charge Nurse for return to the family or responsible party. Families or responsible parties are reminded of this procedure and related policy when necessary.1. Review of the electronic medical record (EMR) for R17 revealed diagnoses including, but not limited to, chronic systolic…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-04 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, and review of the facility-provided document titled Housekeeping: Discharge and Monthly Deep Cleaning of the Resident Room, the facility failed to maintain a clean, homelike environment in two of 12 resident rooms (rooms [ROOM NUMBERS]) on the 300 Hall. This deficient practice had the potential to place the residents residing in the rooms at risk of living in an unsanitary living environment and a diminished quality of life.Findings include: Review of the undated facility-provided document titled Housekeeping: Discharge and Monthly Deep Cleaning of the Resident Room revealed the Purpose section stated To detail the proper steps for the discharge and monthly deep cleaning of resident rooms in order to create a sanitary and comfortable environment for the resident. The Procedure section included, 1. Before beginning the deep/discharge clean, confirm with Maintenance Director and Housekeeping Supervisor that all Maintenance and floor care needs ( .PTCA [Packaged Terminal Air…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, resident and staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility's policy titled Occurrences, the facility failed to ensure hazardous chemicals were not stored in one of 34 sampled residents' (R) (R9) rooms. This deficient practice had the potential to place R9 at risk of medical complications related to hazardous chemicals. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Occurrences, revised 1/11/2024, revealed the Policy Statement section included, .To prevent occurrences, each patient/resident will be observed and assessed for risks. Appropriate, realistic interventions will be implemented in accordance with their plan of care. Review of the electronic medical record (EMR) for R9 revealed diagnoses including, but not limited to, muscle weakness, end-stage renal disease, dependence on renal dialysis, unspecified symptoms and signs involving cognitive functions, dysphagia following cerebral infarction, and aphasia following cerebral infarction. Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for R9, dated 6/17/2025, revealed Section…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-04 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, resident and staff interviews, and review of the facility's policy titled Oxygen Administration, the facility failed to ensure oxygen was administered according to the physician's orders for two of 25 residents (R) (R5 and R34) receiving oxygen treatment. This deficient practice had the potential to place R5 and R34 at risk for respiratory complications. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Oxygen Administration, revised 8/2/2023, revealed the Policy Statement section stated, It is the policy of [name of corporation] to provide oxygen safely and accurately to appropriate patients/residents. The Procedure section included, . 4. Regulate liter flow to ordered/desired flow rate. If using portable e-tank, check for full tank, and regulate flow. Turn main control valve on completely and then regulate liter flow meter to ordered/desired flow rate. 1. Review of the electronic medical record (EMR) for R34 revealed diagnoses, including but not limited to, unspecified systolic (congestive) heart failure, ischemic cardiomyopathy, old myocardial…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-05-16 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, staff interviews, and review of the facility's policy titled, Labeling, Dating, and Storage, the facility failed to ensure food stored in the main kitchen and in the unit kitchenette's, were labeled, dated, and not expired. The failure had the potential to increase the prevalence and spread of foodborne illness and infection for all residents. The facility census was 83 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Labeling, Dating, and Storage, revised 11/11/2022, indicated, Food and beverage items will have an identifying label as well as a received date and opened date . for items prepared onsite, a 'use by' date will be indicated. 1. Observation on 5/13/2024 at 9:20 am revealed the following items in the walk-in refrigerator during the initial kitchen tour: A bag of shredded cheese and a block of cheese with no use by date. Nineteen cartons of chocolate milk dated 5/11/2024. Four ½ (one-half) gallon of buttermilk, dated 5/9/24. A container labeled puree turkey, dated 5/9/2024-5/11/2024. A container of cubed potatoes dated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-05-16 · tag F0582 — pattern
  Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, record review, and review of the facility's policy titled Advance Beneficiary Notics (ABNs), the facility failed to provide a Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice (SNFABN) or Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) for two out of three Residents (R) (R23 and R76) who were reviewed after being discharged from Medicare Part A Services and remained in the facility. The sample size was 29 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Advance Beneficiary Notics (ABNs) with a revised date of 7/19/2016 revealed, Policy Statement: The company recognizes the residents have the right to be informed in writing. in a timely fashion, about their liability for payment not of services prior to the provisions of those services if Medicare is expected to pay. The purpose of an Advance Beneficiary Notice (ABN) is to inform the resident that Medicare will probably not pay for a certain item or service in a specific situation, even if Medicare might pay for the item or…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-05-16 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — pattern
  Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interviews, and review of the facility's policies titled, Pneumococcal Vaccinations and Influenza (Flu) Vaccinations for Health Care Center Residents, the facility failed to provide documentation the pneumococcal and influenza vaccines had been offered, given, or previously received outside of the facility for five of five Residents (R) (R286, R23, R12, R72, and R76) reviewed for immunizations. The sample size was 29 residents. Findings include: Review of a policy provided by the facility titled, Pneumococcal Vaccinations, dated 8/29/2023 revealed All residents who reside in this healthcare center are to receive the pneumococcal vaccine(s) within the current CDC guidelines unless contraindicated by their physician or refused by the resident or residents family. If the resident is cognitively impaired, the responsible party will be contacted, and their wishes will be followed in this matter. Review of a policy provided by the facility title, Influenza (Flu) Vaccinations for Health…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-16 · tag F0554 — isolated
  Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility's policy titled Self-Administration of Medications by Patients/Residents, the facility failed to evaluate and determine if it was appropriate for a resident to self-administer medications for one of 29 sampled Residents (R) (R51). This failure placed the resident at risk for inappropriate and unsafe medication use. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Self-Administration of Medications by Patients/Residents, dated 1/28/2020 revealed, Each patient/resident who desires to self-administer medication is permitted to do so if the healthcare center's Licensed Nurse and physician have determined that the practice would be safe for the patient/resident and other patients/residents of the healthcare center . Review of R51's undated Face Sheet, revealed R51 was readmitted with a diagnosis that included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Review of R51's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), located in the EMR (electronic medical record) under the MDS 3.0 Assessment tab, with an Assessment…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-05-16 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, staff interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the call button to activate the emergency call light was accessible for one out of 29 sampled Residents (R) (R53) . This failure placed the resident at risk of accident, injury, and/or unmet needs related to an inability to call for staff assistance. Findings include: Review of R53's Face Sheet tab of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed she was admitted with diagnoses that included heart disease, stage 3 (three) chronic kidney disease, hemiplegia and hemiparesis, contracture of right knee, dysphagia, ataxia, aphasia, vascular dementia, mood disturbance and anxiety, depression disorder and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Review of R53's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 4/29/2024 and located in the MDS tab of the EMR, revealed she scored six out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), indicating severely impaired cognition. R53 required total assistance with toileting, dressing and maximal assistance with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-16 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, resident and staff interviews, and record review, the facility failed to perform nail care for one out of 29 sampled Residents (R) (R38) requiring substantial or maximal assistance from staff for personal hygiene needs. Findings include: Review of R38's undated Face Sheet, revealed R38 was readmitted with diagnoses that included diabetes, hypertension and frequent falls. Review of R38's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), located in the EMR under the MDS tab, with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 3/5/2024, revealed the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of seven out of 15, indicating R38 was moderately cognitively impaired. R38 was also coded as requiring substantial or maximal assistance from staff for personal hygiene. Review of R38's care plans revealed there was no documentation regarding nail care. Observations on 5/13/2024 at 3:47 pm and on 5/14/2024 at 9:28 am revealed R38's fingernails were long with brown debris visualized under them. During an interview on 5/15/2024 at 9:02 am, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)1 stated, Her…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$16,801 in federal fines across 3 penalties.

• $4,017 — penalty dated 2024-01-09
• $6,284 — penalty dated 2024-01-09
• $6,500 — penalty dated 2024-01-09

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to PRUITTHEALTH — 95 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 26 rows in the source record cover these 17 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

12 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $2.9M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 28% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in GA