PruittHealth - Lanier

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

55.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 107 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.20 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 22% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 11% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 117 beds and averages 97.2 residents a day — about 83% occupied, or roughly 20 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.19 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.47 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.90 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.79 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.35 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.55 to 0.25 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 34% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

19 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 9 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-06-14 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, staff interviews, and review of the facility's policies titled, Pot/Pan Washing and Sanitation and Ice Machines (Handling/Scoops), the facility failed to prevent wet-nesting in stored steam pans to avoid the potential for bacterial growth and the facility failed to ensure that the ice machine was properly cleaned to prevent bacteria growth. The facility census was 97 and 92 residents received an oral diet.Findings include: 1. Review of the facility policy titled, Pot/Pan Washing and Sanitation revealed under Procedure: 1. Air dry pots and pans on the drain board. Inspect for cleanliness and store pots and pans inverted in a clean, dry, protected area.Observation on 06/12/2026 at 8:40 AM of the pot/pan rack revealed there was a stack with six medium sized square steam table pans. The top two pans were pulled apart, and the inside of both pans were wet. A stack with three small square steam table pans were pulled apart and the top two pans were wet inside.During an interview on 06/12/2026 at 8:40 AM, the Dietary Manager (DM) confirmed that the steam table pans…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-09 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure reasonable accommodation of need related to keeping the call light within reach while in bed to call for staff assistance for two out of 45 sampled residents (R) (R31 and R37). Findings include: 1.Review of electronic health records (EHR) revealed, R31 admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included but not limited to liver cell carcinoma, unspecified dementia, unspecified severity, without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance ,and anxiety, dysphagia, oropharyngeal phase, encounter for palliative care, pain, unspecified, and fracture of unspecified part of neck of right femur. Review of R31's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Section C (Cognitive Patterns), a Brief interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 00 indicating severely impaired cognitive skills; Section GG (Functional Abilities and Goals) indicated R31 required substantial/maximal assistance from staff with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-09 · tag F0640 — isolated
  Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure that the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment was transmitted within 14 days of completion to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Quality Improvement Evaluation System (QIES) Assessment Submission and Processing (ASAP) system for one of 45 sampled residents (R) (R25). Findings include: Review of the MDS Discharge assessment dated [DATE] for Section A (Identification Information) revealed, R25 readmitted into the facility on 1/1/2025 was discharged home on 1/3/2025. Further review revealed that the discharge assessment had not been transmitted. During an observation and interview on 5/9/2025 at 3:45 pm, R25 MDS discharge assessment dated [DATE] was reviewed with the MDS Coordinator. The MDS Coordinator verified the assessment showed as completed in the facility record keeping system. When asked why the assessment stated complete, and CMS data showed it had not been transmitted, the MDS Coordinator stated that surveyor would…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-09 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on staff interviews, records review, and review of the facility's policy titled, MDS Assessment Accuracy, the facility failed to ensure an accurate Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment was completed for one of 45 sampled residents (R) (R52). Specifically, the facility failed to accurately code the use of a wander/elopement alarm for R32. This failure placed the resident at risk for medical complications and unmet needs. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, MDS Assessment Accuracy, dated 12/6/2022, Policy Statement revealed the following: It is the policy of this healthcare center that each Minimum Data Set (MDS) reflects the acuity and the medical status of each patient/resident in accordance with acceptable professional standards and practices. Review of R32's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed R32 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included but not limited to, schizophrenia, dementia, major depressive disorder, and unspecified psychosis. Review of R32's Quarterly MDS assessment with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 3/28/2025 for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-09 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide Activities of Daily Living (ADL's) for one of 45 sampled residents (R) (R5). Specifically, the facility failed to provide nail care for R5. This failure had the potential to affect the resident's comfort, body image and increase the risk for infections. Findings include: Review of the electronic health record (EHR) revealed R5 was admitted with diagnoses that included but not limited to altered mental status, difficulty in walking, and cerebral infarction. Review of R5's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] for Section C (Cognitive Patterns) revealed, a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 12, indicating the resident was cognitively intact; Section GG (Functional Abilities and Goals) revealed, R5 had impairment to the lower extremities and required maximal assistance with showers, upper and lower body dressing. Review of R5's care plan with a revised date of 12/28/2024 revealed R5 was care planned…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-09 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to follow physician orders for one of 45 sampled residents (R) (R7) related to (r/t) behavior monitoring. This deficient practice had the potential to cause undetected changes in the resident's mental status and/or behavior. Findings include: A review of the electronic health record (EHR) for R7 revealed he was admitted with the following diagnosis that included but not limited to vascular dementia, unspecified severity, without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, anxiety and unspecified dementia, and unspecified severity, with agitation. A review of R7's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] for Section C (Cognitive Patterns) revealed, a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 13, indicating he was cognitively intact. A review of R7's care plan with a start date of 1/20/2025 revealed a care plan for psychotropic drug use (r/t) dementia with behavioral disturbance and anxiety…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, record review and review of facility's policy Test Water Temperatures, the facility failed to keep residents free of accident hazards as evidenced by water temperatures above 110 degrees Fahrenheit ( degrees F) in 16 out of 48 resident rooms (102, 104, 103, 105, 106, 108, 110, 112, 114, 116, 201, 203, 210, 212, 213, and 215). The deficient practices had the potential to cause injury to residents residing in these rooms. Findings include: Review of the facility's provided document titled, Test Water Temperatures revealed, 1. For burn prevention, federal guidelines advise that you keep domestic water temperatures below 120 degrees Fahrenheit, although this temperature can still cause burns if exposure reaches five minutes. Many states have even stricter standards that set maximum temperatures lower than 120 degrees Fahrenheit, although 100 degrees Fahrenheit is considered a safe water temperature for bathing. 2. Test temperatures in shower areas 1.Observations on 5/6/2025…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-09 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
  Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility's policy titled How to Purée Foods, the facility failed to ensure that dietary staff followed recipes for preparing puree food items to avoid compromising the nutritive value and flavor for eight of 88 residents receiving a pureed diet. Findings include: A review of an undated facility's policy titled How to Purée Foods under the section titled What is the correct pureed texture revealed, Puréed foods should be soft and moist, cohesive (holds together, not runny), smooth (without lumps) and spoon-thick (does not flow or drip continuously through fork prongs). Properly puréed foods should be 'swallow ready' and not require chewing. Under the section titled Preparation Steps revealed,1. Depending on the resident's dietary restrictions, follow the proper recipe. 5. If required, gradually add a small amount of liquid (2-3 tablespoons) while continuing to process to form a very smooth puree (moist mashed potato consistency); Do not add water. (a.) Add a small amount of hot liquid for hot foods, such as…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-09 · tag F0914 — isolated
  Provide bedrooms that don't allow residents to see each other when privacy is needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interviews, the facility failed to replace a missing privacy curtain and to ensure full visual privacy for one of 48 rooms (room [ROOM NUMBER]). The facility census was 88 residents. Findings include: A review of the facility' Resident Council Minutes Report dated 4/30/2025 revealed, residents had a concern about privacy which stated, Make sure drapes are being closed even if door is closed. An observation on 5/6/2025 at 9:55 am revealed that the privacy curtain for 308-A bed was missing preventing full visual privacy. An interview on 5/6/2025 at 9:57 am with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) LL confirmed that she was aware that the privacy curtain was missing for 308-A bed and that it prevented full visual privacy. An observation on 5/8/2025 at 9:37 am revealed the privacy curtain was still missing for 308 A-bed preventing full visual privacy. An interview on 5/8/2025 at 2:30 pm with the Housekeeping Supervisor revealed that he was unaware that there was a privacy curtain missing and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-06-19 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, and review of the facility policy titled, Infection Control - Housekeeping Services, the facility failed to maintain a clean and homelike environment for residents in 12 of 49 resident rooms (room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER], and room [ROOM NUMBER]). This deficient practice had the potential to place residents at risk for living in an unsanitary and unsafe living environment and a potential for diminished quality of life. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Infection Control - Housekeeping Services, revised 10/16/2023, revealed Policy Statement: It is the policy of this facility to ensure housekeeping services will be performed on a routine and consistent basis to ensure an orderly, sanitary, and comfortable environment. The section titled Routine Cleaning of Horizontal…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to PRUITTHEALTH — 95 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 18 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

8 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $2.1M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 23% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in GA