PruittHealth - Jasper

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

57.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 59 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 67.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 37 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.30 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 47% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 8% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 60 beds and averages 53.6 residents a day — about 89% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.77 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.48 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.98 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.89 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.12 on weekdays — 30% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.59 to 0.22 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 35% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

16 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 6 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-05-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, and review of the facility's policies titled, Enhanced Barrier Precaution (EPB), Transmission-Based Isolation Precautions (TBP), Standard Precautions, and Infection Prevention and Control Plan, the facility failed to sanitize shared medical equipment between residents' use during medication pass observations, failed to follow donning (putting on) and doffing (removing) of PPE practices in a TBP room, failed to wear proper personal protective equipment (PPE) for wound care treatment. The deficient practice had the potential to increase the potential for cross-contamination and spread of infection for all residents who reside in the facility. The facility census was 49. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Enhanced Barrier Precaution (EBP) dated 4/30/2024 documented under Policy: It is the policy of this facility to implement enhanced barrier precautions for the prevention of transmission of multidrug-resistant organism. Under Procedure: . (i) Wounds…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-08 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interview, and review of the facility's policy titled, Medication Storage in the Health Care Center, the facility failed to discard two multidose medications with an illegible expiration date from two of two medication carts. This failure had the potential to put residents at risk due to the instability in the potency of certain medications if given beyond the expiration date. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Medication Storage in the Health Care Center, revised on [DATE] revealed under section titled Procedure number three stated that Nurses are required to check all medications for deterioration and expiration before administration. Nurses are also required to inspect medication storage facilities, including medication carts, routinely. Medication storage areas are to be kept clean, well lit, and free of clutter. Nursing staff who administer medications are responsible for the cleaning and organizing of medication carts and storage areas. Number 12 under…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-04-14 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, staff interviews, and review of the facility policy titled, Infection Control-Housekeeping Services, the facility failed to ensure a safe, clean comfortable, homelike environment for one of 30 sampled residents (R) (R29). Specifically, R29's room was not kept clean. Findings include: A review of the facility policy titled Infection Control-Housekeeping revised 10/16/2023 revealed under Policy Statement: Housekeeping services would be performed on a routine and consistent basis to ensure an orderly, sanitary, and comfortable environment. Further review revealed under Procedure: Routine Cleaning of Horizontal Surfaces: In patient/resident care areas, cleaning of non-carpeted floors would be performed daily and more frequently if spillage or visible soiling occurs. Observation on 4/12/2024 at 8:29 am of R29's room revealed crumbs, dust, a cheese puff, medication cups, and an alcohol prep under R29's bed. Observation on 4/13/2024 at 8:20 am of R29's room revealed the crumbs, dust, a cheese puff, medication cups, and an alcohol prep remained under R29's bed.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-04-14 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility policy titled, Care Plan, the facility failed to implement an intervention identified on the comprehensive care plan for one of 30 sampled residents (R) (R50). Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Care Plan reviewed and revised on 7/27/2023 revealed in the Policy Statement It is the policy of the health care center for each patient/resident to have a person-centered baseline care plan followed by a comprehensive care plan developed following completion of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) and Care Area Assessment (CAA) portions of the comprehensive assessment according to the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Manual and the patient/resident choice. Under the subtitle admission Comprehensive Plan of Care section number four, the third paragraph revealed The care plan approach serves as instructions for the patient/resident's care and provides continuity of care by all partners. Review of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed R50 was with diagnoses including but not limited to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-04-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, staff and resident interviews, record review, and review of the facility policy titled, Occurrences and the facility document titled All Falls for Facility, the facility failed to provide an assistive device to prevent falls for one of 30 sampled residents (R) (R50) This deficient practice had the potential to increase the risk for falls for R50. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Occurrences last reviewed and revised on 1/11/2024 revealed under the Policy Statement, The healthcare center recognizes that due to the frailty of the patients/residents served, there is an increased risk of occurrences that may result in injury to the patient/resident and/or others. To prevent occurrences, each patient/resident will be observed and assessed for risks. Appropriate, realistic interventions will be implemented in accordance with their plan of care. Review of the facility document titled All Falls for Facility with a start date of 4/12/2023 and an end date of 4/12/2024 revealed R50 had two unwitnessed falls on 11/9/2023 and 12/28/2023, one witnessed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2022-12-18 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespread
  Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to have sufficient nursing staff on a 24-hour basis to care for the resident's needs. Specially, the facility failed to have sufficient nursing staff coverage on one or more nights for the entire 7:00 p.m. through 7:00 a.m. shift. This deficient practice had the ability to affect the regularity and quality of care required to maintain resident's needs. Findings included: Review of the staffing schedule for October 2022 revealed that on 10/11/22 for the 7:00 p.m. through 7:00 a.m. shift, there was only one nurse scheduled to be in the facility, Registered Nurse (RN) GG. Review of the shift assignment for Tuesday, 10/11/22 for the 7:00 p.m. through 7:00 a.m. shift revealed there were two nurses assigned to the floor License Practical Nurse (LPN) II and RN GG. Review of the timesheets for 10/11/22 for the 7:00 p.m. through 7:00 a.m. shift revealed RN GG was on duty from 5:40 p.m. through 7:10 a.m. and LPN II was on duty from 6:27 p.m. through 12:28 a.m., which left the facility with one nurse on duty for six and a half…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2022-12-18 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the hand washing sink had hot water for hand sanitation; failed to ensure opened food items were labeled and dated; failed to discard food items past best by date; failed to date food items after arrival, failed have stacked pans free from wet nesting to prevent bacterial growth; failed to have dietary staff properly wash hands before applying new gloves; failed to allow washed dish items to properly air dry and not towel dry before use; and failed to have dietary staff wear proper hair restraint and beard restraint. The facility census was 51 with 49 residents receiving an oral diet. Findings included: 1. Review of facility policy titled Handwashing: Dietary Services revealed 1. Turn on water to desired warm temperature, a minimum of 100 degrees Fahrenheit. Observation on 12/16/22 at 8:05 a.m. of the hand washing sink revealed when the hot water knob was turned on, no water was available. The only water available to wash hands…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-12-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interviews and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective infection prevention and control program that demonstrated ongoing surveillance, recognition, investigation, and control of infection to prevent the onset and spread of infection. The sample size was 51. Findings included: Review of the infection control book for January 2022 to December 2022 revealed the facility did not have collected surveillance data for two full months (October 2022 and November 2022) and no data to date (12/18/22) for December 2022. During an interview on 12/18/22 at 8:50 a.m. with the Infection Control Preventionist (ICP) she revealed she does not know why there is no data in the infection control book for October 2022, November 2022, and December 2022 and revealed she is waiting on the information to be brought to her so she can complete the information for those months. She revealed she began working in the facility two weeks ago and is currently enrolled in the Infection Control Certification Program. During an interview on 12/18/22 at 9:00 a.m. with the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2022-12-18 · tag F0882 — widespread
  Designate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on staff interviews, a review of the facility Position Description titled, Healthcare Center Infection Preventionist, and review of the facility policy titled, Infection Prevention and Control, the facility failed to have a qualified Infection Preventionist who had completed the required specialized training in infection prevention and control. This failure placed all residents at risk for the potential transmission of infections and communicable diseases. The facility census was 51 residents. Findings included: Review of the Position Description titled, Healthcare Center Infection Preventionist modified July 2022 revealed all infection preventionist are required to complete specialized training in Infection Prevention and Control by either Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Nursing Home Infection Preventionist Web-based Training Course and/or University of North Carolina Spice Training as a condition of continued employment within three (3) months of employment. Review of the facility policy, Infection Prevention and Control revised 3/11/21 revealed the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2022-12-18 · tag F0801 — pattern
  Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure that the staff designated as Dietary Manager or Director of Food and Nutrition Services was certified in dietary or food service management or had a similar food service management certification or degree. The facility census was 51 with 49 residents receiving an oral diet. Findings included: Review of the employee file for the Dietary Manager (DM) revealed a hire date of 9/19/22. The DM employee file revealed no certification or education degree in culinary art or any other food service management degree. During an interview on 12/18/22 at 9:10 a.m. the DM revealed that she was first hired at the facility as aide/cook a couple of months ago and was promoted shortly after to Dietary Manager. The DM stated that she does not have certification or degree in food management. The DM revealed after she was promoted, she was told by the Administrator that she would need certification as Dietary Manager. The DM stated that the facility's registered dietitian (RD) was assisting her with getting registered for a course…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to PRUITTHEALTH — 95 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 5 rows in the source record cover these 3 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.4M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 22% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in GA