Pruitthealth - Eastside

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.16 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 14% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 5% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 90 beds and averages 82.5 residents a day — about 92% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.13 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.44 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.00 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.51 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.38 on weekdays — 26% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.48 to 0.33 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 47% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

19 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 9 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · D2026-01-14 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interviews, and review of the facility policy titled Medication Administration: Insulin Injections, the facility failed to ensure insulin was provided according to the blood sugar parameters on the sliding scale insulin physician order for one of five residents (Resident (R) 4), reviewed for unnecessary medications. This deficient practice had the potential to place R4 at increased risk of uncontrolled blood sugar levels. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Medication Administration: Insulin Injections, reviewed 7/28/2025, revealed Check the resident's MAR [medication administration record] or EMAR [electronic MAR] for current orders. Determine what is required according to the prescriber's orders and gather supplies needed.Document administration on the paper MAR or within the e-MAR or use numeric code.Review of R4's Face Sheet, located under the Face Sheet section of the electronic medical record (EMR), revealed the resident was admitted [DATE] and readmitted…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-14 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, and review of the facility policy titled Medication Delivery, the facility failed to ensure medications were stored securely and inaccessible to unauthorized individuals in two of four medication carts. This deficient practice created the potential for residents, unauthorized staff, and visitors to have access to medications and biologicals stored on the medication cart. The facility census was 83 residents. Findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled Medication Delivery, dated 2022, revealed that medications are to be secured at all times and in the presence of licensed staff qualified to administer medications.During an observation on 1/12/2026 at 9:37 am, a medication cart located in the East Hallway, outside of residents' rooms 117-116, was observed unlocked and unattended, with the key present and medications placed on top of the cart. The cart contained multiple labeled prescription medications and medication administration supplies. No licensed staff…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, staff interview, and review of the facility policy titled Hand Hygiene Policy, the facility failed to ensure staff properly performed hand hygiene and peri care for one of three residents (Resident (R)11) observed receiving care. This deficient practice had the potential to place R11 at increased risk of infection. Findings include:Review of the facility policy titled Hand Hygiene Policy, dated 2022, revealed:Staff will perform hand hygiene when indicated, using proper technique consistent with accepted standards of practice. Hand hygiene is indicated and will be performed under the conditions listed in, but not limited to, the attached hand hygiene policy. Between resident contacts. [and] after handling contaminated objects. The use of gloves does not replace hand hygiene. If your task requires gloves, perform hand hygiene prior to donning gloves and immediately after removing gloves.Observation on 1/11/2026 at 3:03 pm revealed Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) 2 wearing gloves while assisting the wound care nurse with a dressing change for R11. After the dressing…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-16 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on staff and responsible party (RP) interviews, record review, and review of the facility's document titled Charge Nurse Workflow, the facility failed to notify one resident's (R) (R1) RP of a change in condition and transfer to the hospital. This failure had the potential to affect one of three residents reviewed for notification of change. Findings include:Review of the facility's document titled Charge Nurse Workflow, updated on 4/19/2022, revealed that when a change of condition is identified, the resident's RP would be notified.Review of the Face Sheet for R1 revealed an original admission date of 3/31/2025. The Face Sheet documented that the primary contact for R1 was Other-Guardian with a name and telephone number listed, and was listed as 1 in the Call Order column. Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 6/24/2025, revealed R1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12, indicating moderately impaired cognition.Review of a document titled Into to Admission revealed that a Department of Human Services representative was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-09-22 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, staff interviews, and review of the facility policies titled Foodborne Illnesses, Labeling, Dating, and Storage, Pot/Pan Washing and Sanitation, and Food Temperatures, the facility failed to thaw meat properly to prevent a foodborne illness, failed to clean a floor fan to prevent food contamination, failed to label and date opened food items, failed to discard leftover foods by the use by date, failed to demonstrate the proper usage of the three-compartment sink to prevent foodborne illness, and failed to properly maintain all food items on the steam table above 135 degrees Fahrenheit (F) to prevent bacteria growth. The deficient practices had the potential to place 78 residents who received an oral diet from the kitchen at risk of contracting a foodborne illness. The facility census was 79. Findings include: 1. A review of the facility policy titled Foodborne Illnesses, reviewed 1/8/2021, revealed the Procedure section included .7. Meats will be thawed and cooked to appropriate internal temperature to prevent foodborne illnesses. Thaw meats under…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-09-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility policies titled Infection Control Precautions for Dressing Change, Clean Procedures, and Using the Treatment Cart and Infection Prevention-Hand Hygiene, the facility failed to ensure infection control practices were followed during wound care for one of two residents (R) (R28) reviewed for wound care. The deficient practice had the potential to increase the probability of R28 contracting an infection in his current wound. Findings include: A review of the facility's undated policy titled Infection Control Precautions for Dressing Change, Clean Procedures, and Using the Treatment Cart revealed the Procedure section included 15. Wash your hands (or use an alcohol cleaner) after removing and discarding the existing dressing. A review of the facility policy titled Infection Prevention-Hand Hygiene, dated 8/22/2024, revealed the Procedures section included D. Indications Requiring Hand Wash or Hand Rub 5. After contact with blood, body…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-22 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, staff interviews, and review of the facility policy titled Nutritional Screening and Assessments/Food Preferences, the facility failed to ensure the Registered Dietitian completed an annual nutritional assessment for one of 30 sampled residents (R) (R53). The deficient practice had the potential to place R53 at risk of unmet nutritional needs. Findings include: A review of the facility policy titled Nutritional Screening and Assessments/Food Preferences, revised 3/28/2024, revealed the Nutrition Assessment will be completed at a minimum of annually for each patient/resident. A review of the medical record revealed R53's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, Alzheimer's disease, dysphagia, feeding difficulties, and stage 3 pressure ulcer. A review of R53's Physician Orders revealed a diet order for regular mechanical soft, no red sauce. A review of the medical record revealed the last nutritional assessment completed by the Registered Dietitian was 6/23/2023. In an interview on 9/22/2024 at 12:05 pm, the facility's Corporate Nurse Consultant (CNC)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-09-22 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility policy titled Oxygen Administration, the facility failed to ensure respiratory equipment was maintained in a sanitary manner for three of 10 residents (R) who received oxygen (R64, R54, and R29). The deficient practice had the potential to place R64, R54, and R29 at an increased risk of respiratory complications and infection. Findings include: A review of the facility policy titled Oxygen Administration, revised 8/3/2023, revealed the internal filters would be changed by a contracted company, and the exteriors of the concentrators would be cleaned weekly. 1. A review of R64's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed section C (Cognitive Patterns) documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 15 (indicating little to no cognitive impairment) and section O (Special Treatments and Programs) documented R64 received oxygen. A review of R64's medical record revealed an order dated 12/26/2023 for oxygen at 3…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-09-22 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
  Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, and resident interviews, the facility failed to ensure a functioning call system for one of 30 sampled residents (R) (R39). This failure placed R39 at risk of accident, injury, and/or unmet needs related to an inability to call for staff assistance. Findings include: A review of R39's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed section C Cognitive Patterns) documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 10 (indicating moderate cognitive impairment), and section GG (Functional Abilities and Goals) documented no upper extremity impairment. Observations of R39's call light on 9/20/2024 at 9:51 am and 9/21/2024 at 8:57 am revealed the call light was not working. When the call light was unplugged from the wall, the call light was triggered outside the room, but when the call light was plugged in, and the call light was depressed, the call light did not trigger outside the resident's room. An interview with R39 on 9/20/2024 at 9:56 am revealed he…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-05-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, staff interviews, and a review of the facility's policies titled, Labeling, Dating, Leftovers, Food Temperatures, Refrigeration/Freezer Temperatures, and Storage, and Pot/Pan Washing and Sanitation, the facility failed to ensure food items in the refrigerator were properly labeled, dated, and discarded; failed to ensure the dish machine had a final rinse temperature at or above 180 degrees for proper sanitization; failed to properly wash food processor bowl, lid, and blade between pureed food items to prevent cross contamination; failed to properly use the three-compartment sink to properly sanitize dishware; failed to ensure all food items on the steam table were held at or above 135 degrees to prevent foodborne illness; and failed to ensure all refrigerators containing food items had an internal temperature of 41 degrees or below to prevent bacterial growth. The facility census was 75, with 73 residents consuming an oral diet. These failures had the potential to support bacterial growth associated with foodborne illness. Findings include: 1. Review of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to PRUITTHEALTH — 95 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 17 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

8 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 85% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.3M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 18% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in GA