Pruitthealth - Marietta

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

46.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 63 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 65.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 26 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.26 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 37% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 4% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 119 beds and averages 106.5 residents a day — about 89% occupied, or roughly 12 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.94 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.49 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.69 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.70 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.04 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.53 to 0.40 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 57% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

18 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 6 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2025-01-16 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews, record reviews, and review of the facility policy titled Care Plans, the facility failed to develop a care plan for one resident (R)(R715) of 49 sampled related to amount of assistance needed to provide care during a transfer. Actual harm occured on 11/5/2024 when R715 was hit on the head by the mechanical lift swing when Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) KK attempted a transfer alone. This resulted in bruising to the left eye of R715. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Care Plan dated 7/27/2023 documented It is the policy of the health center for each resident to have a person-centered care plan. (2) Care plan will be updated to reflect changes to approaches, as necessary, that result from significant changes in conditions or needs. (4) Care plans will be updated by nurses or any other interdisciplinary team member so that the care plan will reflect the resident's needs at any given moment. Review of the most recent Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE]…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2025-01-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff and resident interviews, record review, and review of the facility's policy titled, Occurrence Reduction Plan, the facility failed to provide adequate staff to prevent injuries while using a mechanical lift for one of 49 sampled residents (R) (R715). Actual harm occured on 11/5/2024 when R715 was hit on the head by the mechanical lift swing when Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) KK attempted a transfer alone. This resulted in bruising to the left eye of R715. Findings included: A review of the facility's policy titled, Occurrence Reduction Plan, dated 1/29/2021 documented Reporting all occurrences of unknown origins to the Administrator or design immediately. Participating in investigations of unknown occurrences as outlined in the abuse prohibition policies. A review of the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed that R715 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included primary cerebral ischemia (blood flow to the brain), osteoarthritis (breaks down joint bone…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-02-26 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations and staff interviews, and review of the facility policy titled, Disposal of Medications, the facility failed to ensure expired medications were removed from active medication storage areas and unavailable for use in one of two medication rooms (first floor medication room) reviewed. This deficient practice had the potential to affect 51 residents receiving medications on the unit.Findings include:Review of the facility policy titled Disposal of medications revised 12/15/2026 indicated under Policy Statement: It is the policy of 'company name' Pharmacy Services that medications which have expired, been discontinued, or remain in the healthcare center after a patient/resident's discharge shall be removed from active stock and placed in disposal.Observation on 02/25/2026 at 10:30 AM of medication storage was conducted in the first-floor medication room and medication carts. During inspection of medication stock, the following expired medications were observed stored with active medications and available for administration:One container of lidocaine oral solution…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-26 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure oxygen equipment was safely maintained and monitored for two of nine residents (R) (R70 and R83) reviewed for oxygen use. Specifically, the facility failed to remove an oxygen tank from a resident room that was unsecure and unattended (R70) and failed to date respiratory supplies and to keep an oxygen concentrator filter free of debris (R83). The deficient practices had the potential to create accident hazards, improper oxygen administration, and impaired oxygen delivery.Findings include:1. Review of the Electronic Health Record (EHR) for R70 revealed the resident was admitted with diagnoses including but not limited to Alzheimer's disease, unspecified dementia, Type 2 diabetes mellitus, generalized anxiety disorder, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, dysphagia, lymphedema, and repeated falls.Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for R70 documented in Section C (Cognitive Patterns) a Brief…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure appropriate hand hygiene practices were performed during wound care treatment for one of six residents (R) (R6) with pressure ulcers. This deficient practice had the potential to increase the risk of transmission of infection. Findings include:Review of the electronic medical records (EMR) revealed R6 was admitted with diagnoses that included but not limited to Alzheimer's disease with late onset, severe dementia, paraplegia, peripheral vascular disease, underweight/low BMI (body mass index), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), and Stage IV pressure ulcer of the sacral region.Review of the resident's care plan revealed: (Problem Start Date: 09/18/2025) reflected interventions intended to reduce risk of complications and infection, including: weekly wound assessments with measurements, treatment as ordered, use of a low-air-loss (LAL) mattress, use of positioning/off-loading devices (e.g., wedges/boots), keeping the resident clean and dry, keeping linens clean/dry/wrinkle free, enhanced barrier precautions,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-01-16 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespread
  Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident interviews, and staff interviews, the facility failed to maintain a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment as evidenced by wedged items in privacy curtain and dust build up in PTAC in room [ROOM NUMBER], a loose PTAC unit in room [ROOM NUMBER], peeling trim near the second floor shower room, substances on the floor/tile in the A-Hall shower room, black and black/brown substances in the ceiling of kitchen dish washing room and dry storage area. This deficient practice had the potential to jeopardize the health and safety of all 106 residents in the facility in three resident rooms, two of four shower rooms, and the kitchen. Findings include: Observation made on 1/14/2025 at 11:27 am in room [ROOM NUMBER] revealed a privacy curtain rail with a brown item wedged into the end of the railing and exposed insulating spray foam on the left wall of the PTAC unit. Observation made on 1/14/2025 at 11:55 am in room [ROOM NUMBER] revealed a loose PTAC unit. Observation made on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-16 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility policy titled, Medication Administration: General Guidelines, the facility failed to adhere to accepted standards of quality care by crushing medications that cannot be opened or crushed in one out of seven residents observed during a medication pass, and not measuring the correct dosage of Diclofenac ointment (nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) used to reduce pain and inflammation) in one out of seven residents (R) (R12) who have diclofenac ointment ordered. This deficient practice could result in serious adverse effects, including an increased risk of medication side effects or reduced efficacy due to improper administration techniques. Findings include: A review of the facility policy Medication Administration: General Guidelines revised 4/10/2019 reveals that Medications are administered as prescribed. 2. Medications are administered in accordance with written orders of the attending physician .If a dose seems…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident and staff interviews, and review of facility policy titled Transmission Based Isolation Precautions, the facility failed to maintain sanitary conditions for two of 50 sampled residents (R)(R23 and R3). Specifically, oxygen equipment (nasal cannula) was hung over the humidifier and touched the floor when not in use for R23 and the facility failed to use appropriate Personal Protection Equipment (PPE) for a resident R3 on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) of 50 sampled residents. This deficient practice could risk equipment contamination, increasing the likelihood of infections and health complications. Findings include: 1.A policy on maintaining oxygen supplies, such as nasal cannulas, under sanitary conditions was requested but not provided. A review of the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed that R23 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including, but not limited to intracerebral hemorrhage, pneumonia, nasal congestion, pulmonary nodule, acute respiratory…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2022-10-07 · tag F0700 — pattern
  Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, interviews, and review of the facility's policy, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure bed/side rails had been assessed for the risk of entrapment and only used bed/side rails after trying other alternatives for three of three residents (R) (R#15, R#46, and R#249). The facility also failed to obtain informed consent for the use of bed/side rails for two of three residents (R#15 and R#46) reviewed for bed/side rail use. Finding included: A review of the facility's policy titled Bed Rails last revised 2/1/18 indicated, Bed Rails (also referred to as side rails) are adjustable metal or rigid plastic bars that attach along the side of a patient's bed for the purpose of preventing a patient from falling out of the bed or for assisting a patient independently to turn or maneuver themselves in the bed. Bed rails are available in a variety of types, shapes, and sizes, ranging from full, to one-half, one-quarter, or one-eighth of a bed. Prior to installing or using bed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2022-10-07 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
  Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record review, and document review, it was determined the facility failed to have sufficient nursing staff to provide care for two of nine (R) (R#12 and R#293) reviewed for activities of daily living and one of four residents (R#56) who required daily wound care. Findings included: A review of the Facility Assessment for 2022 revealed the facility evaluated Staffing, Training, Services & Personnel for Overall Staffing, Staff Competencies, and Services. According to the assessment, for a sufficiency analysis summary indicated to Use and/or refer to: 1. Staffing and scheduling systems 2. Staff training and competency programs 3. A review of individual staff assignments and systems for coordination and continuity of care for residents withing and across staff assignments. An interview with the Administrator on 10/7/22 at 2:40 p.m. revealed the facility was staffed according to the census. According to the Administrator, when the resident census ran in the 90s, he liked to have…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2022-10-07 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — pattern
  Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, document review, and interviews, the facility failed to prohibit the Director of Nursing (DON) from serving as a charge nurse for eight of 18 days reviewed when the facility's census was greater than 60 residents and there was no staffing waiver in effect. Findings included: During an observation on 10/3/22 at 9:48 a.m., the DON was observed working a medication cart and administering mediations to residents. A review of a Census Daily Detail by Name Report: All Units for 10/3/22 indicated the census of the facility was 90 residents. During an interview on 10/5/22 at 3:07 p.m., the Human Resources (HR) Director, HR XX, stated when the DON worked on the floor, the DON did so as a charge nurse. HR XX stated that, as a charge nurse, the DON was responsible for a medication cart and the administration of medications to residents. HR XX reviewed Daily Nursing Staff Forms with the surveyor and confirmed the DON was scheduled and worked as a charge nurse on 9/20/22 during the 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. shift, on 9/21/22 during the 7:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m. shift, on 9/26/22…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2022-10-07 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record review, and document review, the facility failed to accommodate the needs of three of 48 sampled residents (R) (R#3, R#21, and R#52) related to providing a functional shower bed for use on the second floor of the facility, resulting in the residents failing to receive showers as preferred. Findings included: A review of a facility Daily Census Report dated 10/6/22 revealed five of 48 residents on the second floor desired a shower bed for bathing. 1. A review of R#3's Face Sheet revealed the resident had diagnoses including a left-hand contracture, generalized muscle weakness, lack of coordination, functional quadriplegia, spinal stenosis, osteoarthritis, degenerative disease of the nervous system, and morbid obesity. A review of R#3's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 9/24/22, revealed the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating intact cognition. The assessment indicated that R#3 had bilateral impairments in range…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$8,948 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $8,948 — penalty dated 2025-01-16

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to PRUITTHEALTH — 95 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 16 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

8 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 77% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $2.7M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 26% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in GA