No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Grand Meadows Senior Living & Health Care

5300 Grand Meadow Drive, Asbury, IA 52002 · For profit - Corporation · 32 certified beds · (563) 588-1413 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Apr 2024Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)1 immediate-jeopardy citation$16,448 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Apr 2024
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (20) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $16,448 in federal fines (most recent 2024-04-23)
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • it did not file the payroll staffing data CMS requires — its 1 of 5 staffing rating is the rating CMS assigns for not reporting, not a measure of how many nurses are on the floor
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 2 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
2395 NW Arterial · (563) 557-3995 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
2395 NW Arterial · (563) 582-3436 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Aldi0.6 mi
2160 Holliday Dr · (855) 955-2534 · Call to confirm hours
Park
5289 Asbury Rd · (563) 556-7106 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 2 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 2 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 2 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 3 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased13.7%17.1%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight0.0%4.6%5.4%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%1.5%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection5.6%2.4%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms1.4%4.2%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.2%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury9.2%3.8%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened21.1%16.6%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication17.0%20.8%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%95.3%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.2%4.2%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control24.9%25.6%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table18.6%19.5%17.1%typical
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication3.0%2.1%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine59.6%73.3%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission45.8%20.9%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit40.3%13.2%12.0%check this — see note marked dagger below the table

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

This value is several times the typical-state benchmark. It can be real, or it can be a coding artifact in what the facility submitted. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

47.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 69 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

47.1%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.1%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
84.0%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.58U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.27hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.25hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.06hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 84.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 50 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.58 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 87% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 3% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF47.1%CMS range 38.4–59.951.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.1%CMS range 7.2–16.210.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge84.0%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge78.0%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge76.0%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay1.4%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.3%CMS range 3.9–11.97.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.641.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

No payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours are on file for this home — and the record suggests that is because it did not report them. CMS rates its staffing 1 of 5, which is the rating CMS assigns when a home does not report. Every Medicare-certified nursing home is required to submit its actual payroll data quarterly, and that submission is what makes staffing numbers auditable rather than a claim. A home that does not file is not the same as a home with no data yet: ask this home directly what its nurse-to-resident ratios and weekend RN coverage are, why its payroll data is not filed, and weigh the independent health-inspection score heavily in the meantime.

Inspection trend

7
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-03-26)
4
at the previous standard inspection (2025-03-06)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

20 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 9 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-04-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews and facility policy review the facility failed to secure and supervise access to 2 out of 2 hot steam table surfaces. This failure resulted in the ability of eight cognitively impaired and independently mobile residents to access the areas that held the steam tables, therefore causing an Immediate Jeopardy to the health, safety, and security of the residents. The State Agency informed the facility of the Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) that began as of February 15, 2024 on April 17, 2024 at 3:10 p.m. Facility staff removed the Immediate Jeopardy on April 17, 2024 through the following actions: a. The meals will be served in the Bistro common dining room. b. All meals will be served in this location until the barriers can be placed between resident care areas and the kitchen serving area where the steam tables are located. c. The two steam tables were disabled from use to prevent any cognitively impaired residents in the units from possibly getting burned. d. The keys that turn the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-26 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident and staff interview, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure residents had a dignified dining experience for Resident #13 and four additional residents. The facility reported a census of 29 residents.Findings Include: Review of Resident #13's Quarterly Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 10 out of 15, which indicated moderate cognitive impairment. The MDS further revealed diagnosis of unspecified dementia without behavioral disturbance and Diabetes Mellitus. On 3/26/26 at approximately 6:45 AM, an observation was made of residents brought to the dining table by Staff K Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA). Five residents were observed at the table by 7:00 AM. Several residents including Resident #13 were heard repeatedly asking for something to drink. Resident #13 repeatedly asked for coffee and was told by Staff F it would be a little bit. Other residents were heard asking for water or a snack and wondering where their…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-26 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, staff interviews and facility policy review the facility failed to notify the physician of change in resident transfer status and pain in left ankle for 1 out of 1 resident reviewed with injury of unknown origin (Resident #25). The facility identified a census of 29 residents. Findings include:Review of the Minimum Data Set for Resident #25 dated 12/5/25 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 15 out of 15 which indicated intact cognition. The MDS noted Resident #25 needed supervision or touching assistance for sit to stand transfers and toilet transfers. The MDS listed diagnoses of hypertension (high blood pressure), end stage renal disease, and diabetes. Review of the facility nurse progress notes from 2/13/26 through 2/15/26 lacked any documentation of left ankle pain or change in transfer status or ability to bear weight. The progress notes failed to reveal any physician notification. Review of the progress notes from dialysis on 2/16/26 for Resident #25, with no time indicated, revealed she arrived today with a complaint of much pain in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-26 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interviews, and the Medicare Claims Processing Manual the facility failed to provide a resident with form CMS-10055 (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) at the end of therapy services when the resident planned to remain in the building for one of three residents reviewed for Beneficiary Notice (Resident #20). The facility reported a census of 29 residents.Findings include:A review of Resident #20's Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] revealed he admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident ended his therapy and Medicare stay on 11/07/2025. His Brief Interview for Mental Status score was 11/15, which indicated moderate cognitive impairment.On 3/26/26 the facility was asked to provide documentation of the resident's CMS 10055 (Advance Beneficiary Notice of Non-Coverage or ABN) and CMS 10123 (Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage or NOMNC) forms.A document titled Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC, CMS 10123) dated 11/07/2025 documented the end of Resident #20's skilled services. It was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-26 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to document targeted behaviors and provide non-pharmacological interventions prior to the use of an as needed antianxiety medication for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Resident #9). The facility reported a census of 32 residents.Findings include:The Minimum Data Set assessment for Resident #9 dated 3/5/26 identified a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 8 out of 15, indicating moderate cognitive impairment. The MDS identified a PHQ-2 (Patient Health Questionnaire, a screening tool used to assess the frequency of depressed mood) score of 0, which indicated no depression. The MDS documented the resident displayed no behavioral symptoms, hallucinations or delusions during the look back period. The MDS documented diagnoses that included non-Alzheimer's Dementia, anxiety, and depression. The Care Plan for Resident #9 dated 3/2/26 identified a focus area of depression and anxiety related to dementia. It directed staff to monitor, document and report signs and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-26 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, staff interviews, and facility policy review the facility failed to assess and intervene for a resident with a fall which resulted in a fracture (Resident #1) and for a major injury of unknown origin (Resident #25) for 2 out of 2 residents reviewed with injuries. The facility reported a census of 29 residents. Findings include:1. Review of the Minimum Data Set for Resident #25 dated 12/5/25 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 15 out of 15 which indicated intact cognition. The MDS noted Resident #25 needed supervision or touching assistance for sit to stand transfers and toilet transfers. The MDS listed diagnosis of hypertension (high blood pressure), end stage renal disease and diabetes. Review of the nurse progress note 2/16/26 at 1:48 PM revealed Resident #25 went to the emergency department related to left ankle pain. The progress note dated 2/16/26 at 6:03 PM revealed Resident #25 had a tibial fracture on left leg. Resident #25 needed to be completely non weight bearing and wear a boot to move around. Review of the progress…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and staff interviews the facility failed to provide enhanced barrier precautions to prevent the spread of infections for 2 out of 4 residents ( Resident # 7) with a catheter and (Resident # 11) with an open wound. The facility identified a census of 29 residents. Findings include: 1.Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #7 had an indwelling catheter.The Care Plan for Resident #7 with a revision date of 3/16/26 revealed the resident had an indwelling foley catheter. Resident #7's Care Plan directed staff to position the catheter bag and tubing below the level of the bladder and away from the entrance room door. The Care Plan failed to direct staff to use enhanced barrier precautions with the use of the catheter. On 3/26/26 at 11:25 AM Staff C, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) emptied the foley catheter for Resident #7 in her room. She did not utilize any personal protective equipment and failed to utilize enhanced barrier precautions.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-26 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, and facility policy review the facility failed to screen residents for eligibility of the pneumococcal vaccine for 2 of 5 residents reviewed (Resident #7 and Resident #13). The facility reported a census of 29 residents.Findings Include: 1. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment tool, dated 3/2/26 revealed Resident #7 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The MDS revealed the resident had severely impaired cognition for daily decision making. The admission MDS documented the resident received a Influenza vaccine outside the facility, was not up to date with pneumococcal vaccination, and was not offered a pneumococcal vaccine. The Immunization Consent Form for Resident #7 dated 10/24/24 documented the resident received a Covid vaccine and Influenza vaccine. There was no documentation of a pneumococcal vaccine.The Immunization Consent Form for Resident #7 dated 10/16/25 documented the resident received an Influenza vaccine. The was no documentation of a pneumococcal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-13 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, clinical record review, resident interview, staff interview, and review of the facilities Resident's Rights form revealed staff failed to treat 1 of 3 residents with dignity and respect during cares as a means to maintain their individual resident rights (Resident #3). Findings include: A Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment form dated 3.27.25 indicated Resident #3 was admitted to the facility on 3.12.25 with diagnoses that included Chronic Kidney Disease, Osteoarthritis, and Sjorgren Syndrome (autoimmune disease). The assessment indicated the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15 (cognitively intact). An interview was conducted 6.11.25 at 12:38 p.m. with the resident and the Administrator present per the resident's suggestion as her story would not have swayed from the truth of what occurred and everyone could have heard about the incident. The resident indicated she had been told by an unknown person to report the incident to the Social Services (SS) designee who went to the resident's room on 3.24.25 first for a routine…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-06 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, kitchen record review, interview, and policy review the facility failed to store food according to professional guidelines and to clean dishes under sanitary conditions during 1 of 2 kitchen observations. Dry storage and the refrigerator contained expired, unlabeled, and undated items. Dishwasher sanitizer logs were not maintained and the sanitizer sink did not register chemical content. The facility reported a census of 29 residents. Findings include: During the initial kitchen observation on 03/03/25 from 09:57 AM to 10:24 AM the surveyor observed the following: a. 16 - 1 pound boxes of baking soda that expired in July 2024 b. sliced cheese wrapped in saran wrap without a label or open date c. opened, undated 5 pound container of cottage cheese d. clear plastic bins of vegetable soup, tomato paste, and pickles covered with saran wrap dated 2/20/25 (11 days prior) e. clear plastic bin of chicken gravy, undated f. dishwasher chemical logs recorded concentration testing until 2/18/25 g. staff tested the dishwasher chemical with a test strip that did not register…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-06 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, staff interview, and policy review the facility failed to provide range of motion services to improve or maintain functioning in all extremities for 1 out of 1 residents reviewed (Resident #11). The facility reported a census of 29 residents. Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] for Resident #11 indicated a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15/15 which indicated intact cognition. The MDS documented diagnoses of symptoms and signs involving the musculoskeletal system (include muscle weakness, joint pain, limited range of motion, tremors, and gait disturbance), reduced mobility, and spasmodic torticollis (neck muscles contract involuntarily). It further recorded the resident did not receive active or passive range of motion (ROM) restorative nursing in the prior 7 calendar days. Resident #11's Care Plan initiated of 03/29/24 revealed he had a self care performance deficit due to fatigue and required assistance of 1 staff for bathing,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 9 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-06 · tag F0699 — isolated
    Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, and record review the facility failed to provide trauma informed care for 1 of 5 residents reviewed (Resident #15). The resident arrived at the facility on 2/17/25 with diagnoses of PTSD (Post Traumatic Stress Disorder), anxiety, adjustment disorder, and depression and was not assessed for potential triggers that could cause re-traumatization. The facility reported a census of 29 residents. Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident #15 documented diagnoses of adjustment disorder with depressed mood, PTSD, depression, and anxiety disorder. The MDS included a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11/15 which indicated moderately impaired cognition. Resident #15's Care Plan indicated the resident had current thoughts of suicide, the primary care provider was notified, and the resident was seen by psych. The resident had no active plans as of 2/24/25. Interventions included face to face consults with the primary provider and psych, monitoring and documenting behaviors, and social service visits with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-06 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, interviews, and policy review the facility failed to ensure psychotropic medications were used only to treat documented conditions for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Resident #25). The facility did not respond to the pharmacist's request to document resident behaviors or implement non-pharmacological interventions to help reduce anxiety. The facility reported a census of 29 residents. Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident #25 dated 01/21/25 included documentation that the resident was unable to complete the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) due to long and short term memory problems and severely impaired daily decision making. Diagnoses on the MDS included non-Alzheimer's dementia, anxiety disorder, and depression. Resident #25's Care Plan included a focus area dated 10/10/24 indicating she was at risk for falls, wandering, poor decision making, and forgetting her walker due to dementia. A focus area dated 11/25/24 documented the resident had dementia with behavior disturbance. An intervention…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-04-23 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, policy review, and staff interview the facility failed to date opened foods, use gloves appropriately for serving meals, keep hands off the drinking surfaces of drinking glasses, keep the ice machine clean, and keep the kitchen and household kitchenettes clean in order to serve meals under sanitary conditions. The facility reported a census of 30 residents. Findings include: During a continuous observation of the kitchen on 4/15/24 from 10:00 AM to 10:28 AM the following was revealed: A. [NAME] streaks running down the lip of the ice chute in the ice machine B. Egg noodles opened and undated C. Mandarin oranges in a Styrofoam cup covered in plastic wrap undated in the refrigerator D. Food matter on the floor by the heating unit and the two-compartment sink near the refrigerator During an observation on 4/15/24 of the [NAME] Household kitchenette at 10:38 AM the following was revealed: A. Food particles in the fridge B. Food splatters and particles in the freezer bins C. Open, undated frozen…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-04-23 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — pattern
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, policy review, and staff interview the facility failed to keep garbage cans covered near food preparation surfaces to provide a sanitary cooking environment. The facility reported a census of 30 residents. Findings include: During an observation of the kitchen on 4/15/24 at 10:00 AM the trash can next to the meat slicer was found with the lid on the floor and trash in the can. The trash can directly contacting the food preparation counter was also without a lid and trash was present in the can. At 2:18 PM the trash can next to the food preparation counter was uncovered with canned fruit exposed in a bowl next to the trash can. On 4/16/24 at 9:50 AM both trash cans were found without lids. The trash can contacting the food preparation counter had a soiled plastic sheet overflowing out of the can. During an interview on 4/17/24 at 9:16 AM Staff A, Dietary Services Manager explained his expectation is for trash cans to be covered when not in use. During food preparation they can be left open to avoid staff touching lids when working with food, but should otherwise…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-23 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, resident and staff interview and policy review the facility failed to prevent a resident from neglect for 1 out of 1 residents who reported abuse (Resident #35). The facility reported a census of 30 residents. Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #35 had a Brief Interview Memory Score (BIMS) of 15 which indicated cognitively intact. The MDS indicated he was dependent for toilet transfers and toileting hygiene. The reason for admission was amputation. Resident #35 had blindness of the right eye. On 04/17/24 at 9:28 AM during an interview Resident #35 stated a staff member became frustrated because he needed to use the call light frequently. She told me I was wearing a depend and to use it, then I don't have to come in here every few minutes. The staff member left and when I went to hit the button it was gone. She came back in for some reason and gave me trouble about wanting to use the buzzer and said oh there it is and it was curled up on the end of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-23 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, resident and staff interviews the facility failed to complete a thorough investigation of allegation of abuse to prevent further abuse. The facility reported a census of 30 residents. Finding include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #35 had a Brief Interview Memory Score (BIMS) of 15 which indicated cognitively intact. The MDS indicated he was dependent for toilet transfers and toileting hygiene. The reason for admission was amputation. Resident #35 had blindness of right eye. On 04/17/24 at 9:28 AM during an interview with Resident #35 he states a staff member became frustrated because he needed to use the call light frequently. She told me I was wearing a depend and to use it, then I don't have to come in here every few minutes. The staff member left and when I went to hit the button it was gone. She came back in for some reason and gave me trouble about wanting to use the buzzer and said oh there it is and it was curled up on the end of the table…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-23 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — isolated
    Have a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interviews, facility record review, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure an effective Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) process to address previously identified quality deficiencies, resulting in repeated deficiencies cited on the current survey and cited in previous surveys. The facility reported a census of 30 residents. Findings include: The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) 2567 form dated 9/13/22, reflected deficiencies identified for accidents and hazards. The CMS 2567 form dated 2/28/23, reflected deficiencies identified for accidents and hazards. The CMS 2567 form dated 9/14/23, reflected deficiencies identified for accidents and hazards. During the current recertification, complaint, and facility reported incident survey dated 4/23/23, the team identified the same deficiency, Accident and Hazards (F689). On 4/22/24 at 3:19 PM, the Registered Nurse Consultant (RNC) reported he's worked on the accidents and hazards in the building, however he failed to know if the previous team worked on that citation. On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-14 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide appropriate assessment and interventions for one of three residents reviewed. (Resident #1). The facility reported a census of 26 residents. Findings include: Resident #1's MDS (Minimum Data Set), an assessment tool, dated 5/16/2023 revealed the resident transferred from one surface to another with extensive assistance of two staff, failed to ambulate, and had a fall history prior to admission. The resident had falls since admission without injury. The MDS reported the resident had diagnoses including other fracture of the right lower extremity, diabetes, renal insufficiency, asthma, cirrhosis of the liver, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Resident #1's Care Plan initiated 5/10/2023 identified the resident had a potential for falls related to a history of falls and dementia. The Care Plan directed staff to assist the resident with pivot transfers, and ensure non weight bearing of the resident's right lower extremity. The Care Plan identified the resident had impaired skin related to a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to appropriately supervise one of three residents to ensure their safety. (Resident #1). The facility reported a census of 26 residents. Findings include: Resident #1's MDS (Minimum Data Set), an assessment tool dated 5/16/2023 revealed the resident transferred from one surface to another with extensive assistance of two staff, failed to ambulate, and had a fall history prior to admission. The resident had falls since admission without injury. The MDS reported the resident had diagnoses including other fracture of the right lower extremity, diabetes, renal insufficiency, asthma, cirrhosis of the liver, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The discharge MDS dated [DATE] revealed the resident had two falls without injury and one with major injury since the prior assessment. Resident #1's Care Plan initiated 5/10/2023 identified the resident had a potential for falls related to a history of falls and dementia. The Care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$16,448 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $16,448 — penalty dated 2024-04-23

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to TUTERA SENIOR LIVING & HEALTH CARE — 25 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 52.0-1.0 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.2-0.2 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 51.7-0.7 vs chain
Quality measures 2 of 53.0-1.0 vs chain
The other 24 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.0★, per CMS)
1 of 5Bethany Rehab & HccDekalb, IL 1 of 5Carlinville Rehab & HccCarlinville, IL 1 of 5Coulterville Rehab & HccCoulterville, IL 1 of 5Crystal Pines Rehab & HccCrystal Lake, IL 1 of 5Fair Oaks Rehab & HealthcareSouth Beloit, IL 1 of 5Hillsboro Rehab & HccHillsboro, IL 1 of 5Mattoon Rehab & HccMattoon, IL 1 of 5Metropolis Rehab & HccMetropolis, IL 1 of 5Moweaqua Rehab & HccMoweaqua, IL 1 of 5St Paul's Senior CommunityBelleville, IL 1 of 5Windsor Estates Of St CharlesSaint Charles, MO 2 of 5The Village At MissionPrairie Village, KS 2 of 5Westview Of Derby Rehabilitation & Health Care CenDerby, KS 3 of 5Carnegie Village Rehabilitation & Health Care CentBelton, MO 3 of 5Dixon Rehab & HccDixon, IL 3 of 5Highland Rehabilitation & Health Care CenterKansas City, MO 3 of 5Lakeland Rehab & Healthcare CenterEffingham, IL 3 of 5Meridian Rehabilitation And Health Care CenterWichita, KS 3 of 5Monterey Park Rehabilitation & Health Care CenterIndependence, MO 3 of 5NorterreLiberty, MO 3 of 5Northland Rehabilitation & Health Care CenterKansas City, MO 3 of 5Stratford Commons Rehab & Health Care CenterOverland Park, KS 3 of 5Tiffany Springs Rehabilitation & Health Care CenteKansas City, MO 5 of 5Charlton Place Rehab And Healthcare CenterDeatsville, AL

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
SEITERA LP LLCOrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 10/01/2024
CONSTACE MARIE MENDOLIA 2009 IRRV TROrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2024
DOMINIC FRANK TUTERA 2016 IRRV TROrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 10/01/2024
HANNAH MARIE TUTERA 2016 IRRV TROrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 10/01/2024
JOSEPH CHARLES TUTERA JR 2016 IRRV TROrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 10/01/2024
LAURA CIRESE TUTERA 2016 IRRV TROrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 10/01/2024
MARY MARGARET CUNNINGHAM 2009 IRRV TROrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2024
WALNUT CREEK MANAGEMENT COMPANY LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/07/2025
BLOOM, RANDALLIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2024
BROOKS, KILEYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2024
TUTERA, JOSEPHIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2024
WARREN, JANETIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2024
GRAND MEADOWS SENIOR LIVING & HEALTH CARE PROPERTY LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 09/30/2024
TUTERA GROUP, INCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 09/30/2024
JEWELL, SUSANIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 05/01/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 22 rows in the source record cover these 15 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

10 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$5.6M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-38.5%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 23%Medicare 10%Other / private 67%

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$372per resident / day
operating cost
$11,323per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$269per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Iowa Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Iowa
$9,277/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,038/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,381/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 165618. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-03-26, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next