Northland Rehabilitation & Health Care Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

47.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 203 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 53.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 104 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.34 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 58% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 25% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 118 beds and averages 100.6 residents a day — about 85% occupied, or roughly 17 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.86 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.42 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.40 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.32 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.08 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.46 to 0.32 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 61% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

20 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 9 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2026-04-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to properly transfer resident (Resident #1), in a safe manner, when staff did not use two staff members and the sit to stand lift (a mechanical lift used to transfer residents) from bed to shower chair, as directed in the resident's plan of care. The resident fell, resulting in a fracture to the right femur. Facility census was 95. On 04/21/2026 the Administrator was notified of the past noncompliance that began on 03/30/2026. The Administrator immediately began an investigation and audit to identify incorrect care plans. The administrator implemented corrective actions to include re-education for nursing staff to provide care as directed in each resident's care plan and Kardex. An interdisciplinary team meeting was conducted immediately following the incident and included nursing, therapy and leadership review of the event. Weekly audits regarding resident transfers on random shifts were implemented and will be conducted for four weeks then monthly for three months to ensure compliance. Results will be reviewed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · E2025-12-30 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — pattern
  Ensure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to serve meals in accordance with facility policy and scheduled mealtimes. This affected two of five sampled residents (Resident #1 and Resident #2) The facility census was 97. Review of facility undated policy titled Dining Service Mealtimes, included, there should be no more than 14 hours between the time the evening meal is offered, and the breakfast meal is offered, or 16 hours if a substantial evening snack is provided. A substantial evening snack included a protein source and a fruit or bread source.Review of the facility mealtimes posted in the hallways and dining room showed:-Breakfast is served at 8:30 A.M.-Lunch is served at 12:30 P.M.-Dinner is served at 5:30 P.M.1.Review of resident's care plan, dated 12/26/25, showed the resident had potential for nutritional problems and had intervention to provide and serve diet as ordered by the physician. Review of Resident #1's admission Sheet, dated 12/29/25, showed diagnosis of acute…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-07-24 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to store, prepare and serve food in accordance with professional standards of food service safety when staff failed to discard expired leftovers in the refrigerator, failed to wear beard nets and hand wash while working in the kitchen, failed to maintain proper standards of cleanliness and storage in the kitchen area, and failed to take accurate temperature readings of cooked food items. This affected all residents by putting them at risk for a food borne illness. The facility census was 95. Review of facility policy Monitoring Food Temperatures for Meal Service, undated, showed:- Food temperatures will be monitored daily to prevent food borne illness and ensure foods are served at palatable temperatures;- Prior to serving a meal, food temperatures will be taken and documented for all hot and cold foods to ensure proper serving temperatures. Any food item not found at the correct holding/serving temperature will not be served but will undergo the appropriate corrective action;- The temperature of each food item…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-07-24 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff treated residents in a manner to maintain their dignity when staff failed to knock on a resident's door and wait for a response before entering which affected one of the 19 sampled residents, (Resident #57), and when staff stood to assist Resident #29 to eat. The facility census was 95. Review of the facility's policy for Resident Rights, dated 12/2024 showed:- Each resident residing in this community has the right and will be afforded the right to a dignified existence, self-determination, and communication with and access to persons and services inside and outside the community without interference, coercion, discrimination or reprisal;- No staff member or contracted provider of care will hamper, compel, treat differently or retaliate against a resident for exercising Resident Rights;- Each resident will have autonomy and choice, to the maximum extent possible, about how each resident wish to live his/her everyday life…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-07-24 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to promote an environment respectful of the rights of each resident to make choices about significant aspects of their lives when staff did not provide satisfactory meals or offer evening (HS) snacks to four residents (Resident #5, #60, #71, and #76), failed to honor resident menu choices for two residents (Resident #33 and #55), failed to serve meals according to one resident's preferences (Resident #8), failed to offer to one resident menu items prepared for the meal (Resident #11), and failed to offer condiments to the alternate dining room. This affected eight of 19 residents sampled. The facility census was 95.Review of the facility policy, Resident Rights, dated 12/2024, showed each resident residing in this community has the right and will be afforded the right to a dignified existence and self-determination. No facility policy was provided regarding snacks. No facility policy was provided regarding resident meals. 1. Review of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-07-24 · tag F0569 — pattern
  Notify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide personal funds and a final accounting within thirty days upon discharge for two residents (#111, #112). This affected two of 19 residents sampled. Facility census was 95. Request for a policy covering resident funds upon discharge was not provided by the facility;1. Review of the facility's interim aging report, dated [DATE], showed the following residents had money in the facility's operating account:-Resident #111 discharged on [DATE], with a credit balance of $2,641.41 in the Resident Liability account;-Resident #112 discharged on [DATE], with a credit balance of $1,360.00 in the Private Pay account;During an interview on [DATE] at 10:30 A.M., the Business Office Manager (BOM) said:- Resident #111's account is being held up for refund due to money owed to Medicare;- At this time the BOM was not able to provide any documentation or correspondence with Medicare that this issue with Resident #111 had been addressed;- Resident #112 was due a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-07-24 · tag F0606 — failed to not employ staff found guilty of abuse — pattern
  Not hire anyone with a finding of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or theft.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to check the Nurse Assistant (NA) registry prior to employment to ensure all newly hired employees did not have a Federal Indicator (marker given to individuals who have committed abuse/neglect for four out of the 10 sampled employees and failed to check the Family Care Safety Registry (FCSR) prior to employment to ensure all newly hired employees did not have negative records/backgrounds for two out of 10 sampled employees hired since October 2024. The facility census was 95.Review of the facility's abuse policy, revised on 1/2024 showed- Each resident has the right to be free from abuse. Residents must not be subjected to abuse by anyone, including staff, volunteers, and other residents. All employees will have a criminal and state/federal required criminal background checks completed prior to start of employment. 1. Review of personnel records for the following staff hired since October 2024, showed:- Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) C hired 03/17/25, NA registry check 04/03/25;- CNA D hired 02/17/25, NA registry check…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-07-24 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide respiratory care and services in accordance with professional standards of practice, by not following physician orders regarding oxygen maintenance of tubing and/or oxygen flow rate on four of the 21 sampled residents, #30, #82, #107 and #108. The facility census was 95.Review of the facility's policy Oxygen Administration dated 3/20/25 showed:-to verify that there is a physician's order for oxygen administration;-to check the tubing connected to the oxygen cylinder or concentrator to assure that it is free of kinks;-to turn on the oxygen and start the flow of oxygen at the rate ordered.Review of the facility's policy Use of Oxygen During Transports dated 3/2025 showed:-If a continuous order, oxygen will be provided to the resident at all times including transports between locations within the facility and also outside of the facility.-Adjust the cylinder flow meter to the ordered amount of oxygen supply by liters.1. Review of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-07-24 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff discarded expired medications and biologicals stored in the rehabilitation nurse's medication room. The sample size was 19 residents. The facility census was 95. Review of the facility's undated policy, Medication Administration, showed:Adherence to this medication administration policy is essential to ensure the well-being and safety of the residents. All staff members are expected to follow these guidelines strictly and to report any issues or deviations from the policy. Continuous improvement and open communication are encouraged to uphold best practices in medication administration. Residents who self-administer must have a profile only medication administration record (MAR) which lists their medications and indicates that they self-administer.Medications should be stored in a secure, locked area with restricted access to authorized personnel only.Expired or discontinued medications should not be stored and should be disposed of according to proper procedures. Observation and interview on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-24 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment to prevent the development and transmission of communicable disease and infections when the facility failed to ensure that staff used proper Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) while providing cares for two of the 19 sampled residents (Resident #2 and # 10) and failed to ensure that new staff had completed a Tuberculin (TB) skin test prior to working. The facility census was 95.Review of the facility policy Infection and Prevention and Control Program (IPCP), dated 2019, showed: - It is the policy that this facility's IPCP is based upon information from the Facility Assessment and follows national standards and guidelines to prevent, recognize, and control the onset and spread of infection whenever possible. The IPCP includes: A system for preventing, identifying, reporting, investigating, and controlling infections and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-07-24 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — pattern
  Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program when numerous flying insects were observed by three residents (Resident #60, #71, and #76) throughout the facility. This affected three of 19 residents sampled. Facility census was 95. Request for facility Pest Policy not provided; Record review of facility pest service, showed:- 7/11/25 Vendor observed fly activity around dumpsters and applied fly treatment. Food residue on equipment and food filth on walls and drains under dish machine, interior door left open;- 6/10/25 Vendor observed fly activity around dumpsters and applied fly treatment. Food residue on equipment and food filth on walls and drains under dish machine, interior door left open; 1. Review of Resident #71's Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 06/24/25, showed:-Cognitive skills intact;- Diagnoses included: Hemiplegia (condition characterized by the paralysis…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to TUTERA SENIOR LIVING & HEALTH CARE — 25 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 6 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $3.0M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 25% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MO