No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Carnegie Village Rehabilitation & Health Care Cent

105 Bernard Drive, Belton, MO 64012 · For profit - Corporation · 78 certified beds · (816) 348-8815 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (816) 348-8815 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0602) — cited Sep 2024Resident-funds citations (F0567, F0569)1 immediate-jeopardy citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)$15,646 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0602), cited Sep 2024
  • it has citations for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0567, F0569)
  • inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (42) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $15,646 in federal fines (most recent 2024-03-19)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (69%) runs well above the national median (45%)
  • about 22% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★ 2/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
1300 E North Ave · (816) 406-3443 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
Hy-Vee<0.1 mi
1307 E North Ave · (816) 318-0400 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
109 N Cedar Dr · (816) 322-1088 · Call to confirm hours
Park
821 Commercial St · (816) 348-7400 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
613 E North Ave · (816) 322-0700

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased3.9%18.1%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight7.0%5.3%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%1.1%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection4.2%2.3%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms11.6%18.5%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury6.6%4.1%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened17.4%17.4%16.1%typical
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication32.6%25.6%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%90.9%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers4.6%4.5%4.7%typical
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control37.9%17.8%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table6.6%23.5%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.4%2.2%1.4%typical
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine96.0%63.5%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission25.6%26.0%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit8.3%13.7%12.0%better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

51.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 251 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

51.5%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
13.6%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
83.3%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
not reportedno hours filed
Therapy hours / resident / day

Met the expected recovery: 83.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 78 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: not reported. This home filed no therapist hours at all in its payroll data for this quarter. That is a gap in what it reported, and we do not read it as an absence of therapy — the homes that file nothing here include ones that discharged hundreds of Medicare rehab patients in the very same period, who plainly received therapy from someone. Because we cannot tell a home that under-reports from one that genuinely provides little, this home is left out of the comparison above rather than scored at zero. Ask it directly how many therapist hours a rehab resident gets, and on which days.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF51.5%CMS range 45.7–57.251.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF13.6%CMS range 10.8–16.910.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024worse than U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge83.3%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge83.3%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge82.0%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified90.9%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay1.5%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization8.4%CMS range 5.5–12.47.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.081.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.62
RN hours/ resident / day
0.95
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.42
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.99
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.63
RN hoursweekends
69.4%
Total nursing turnover
50.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 78 beds and averages 72.7 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.99 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.62 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.42 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.48 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.20 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.61 to 0.63 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 69% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

6
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-07-23)
7
at the previous standard inspection (2023-09-15)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

42 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 31 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · J2024-03-19 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — isolated
    Provide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to contact Emergency Medical Services (EMS), check code status, initiate and provide cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR- an emergency procedure that is performed when a person's heartbeat or breathing has stopped) for one sampled resident (Resident #1) who was a full code status. On [DATE], Registered Nurse (RN) A and Agency Licensed Practical (LPN) A found the resident without spontaneous respirations and pulse. RN A and LPN A did not check the resident's code status, initiate CPR, or contact EMS. As a result the resident died. The facility census was 66. The Regional RN was notified on [DATE] at 12:03 P.M., of the Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) Past Non-Compliance which occurred on [DATE]. On [DATE], the Administrator became aware of the violation of the facility's CPR policy. The facility in-serviced the staff and agency staff on the CPR policy and procedures. The IJ was corrected on [DATE]. Record review of the facility's CPR policy, dated [DATE], showed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-07-23 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to store food appropriately in the kitchen. This practice has the potential to affect all residents, visitors, and employees who eat at the facility. The facility census was 68 residents.Review of the facility's undated policy titled Food Storage (Dry, refrigerated, and frozen) showed:-All food items must be labeled.-The labels must include the name of the food and the date by which it should be sold, consumed, or discarded.1. Observation on 7/17/25 at 9:14 A.M. of the initial kitchen showed:-In the refrigerator, there was cut cantaloupe in a plastic container and was not dated.-In freezer K:--A large package of hot dogs was in its original packaging that was left open to air and the package was not covered or closed in any way and was not dated.--Chicken tenders were in a plastic storage container that the lid was not closed all the way and the container was not dated.--There was a plastic storage container of tater tots and a plastic storage container of fries that were not dated.-On a dry storage shelf, there…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-07-23 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain commodes in the following resident rooms (rooms 107, 100, 167, 162, 140, 132, and 124) free of numerous indentations and scratches which rendered the commodes not easily cleanable. This practice potentially affected 7 residents who resided in those rooms. The facility census was 68 residents.1. Observation on 7/21/25 with the Maintenance Director showed:-At 1:51 P.M. there were numerous indentations on the commode seat in resident room [ROOM NUMBER].-At 1:59 P.M. there were numerous indentations on the commode seat in resident room [ROOM NUMBER].-At 2:29 P.M. there were numerous indentations on commode seat in resident room [ROOM NUMBER].-At 2:41 P.M. there were numerous indentations on the commode seat in resident room [ROOM NUMBER].Observation on 7/22/25 with the Maintenance Director on 7/22/25 showed:-At 9:29 A.M., there were numerous indentations on the commode seat in resident room [ROOM NUMBER].-At 9:58 A.M., there were numerous…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-07-23 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure oxygen and respiratory equipment was kept in a sanitary condition when not in use for three sampled residents (Resident #7, #8, and #33) and failed to ensure one sampled resident's (Resident #33) oxygen was at the correct setting out of 17 sampled residents. The facility census was 68 residents.An oxygen policy was requested and not provided by the time of exit. 1. Review of Resident #7's face sheet showed he/she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of chronic respiratory failure with Hypoxia (when the lungs cannot properly exchange gases).Review of the resident's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS-a federally mandated assessment tool completed by the facility for care planning) dated 6/20/25 showed: -He/She was cognitively intact.-He/She had respiratory failure.-Oxygen therapy was not checked.Review of the resident's care plan dated 6/18/25 showed:-He/She had the potential for altered respiratory status related to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases when the facility failed to follow their policy to provide Tuberculosis (TB-a communicable disease that affects the lungs, that is characterized by fever, cough, difficulty in breathing, abnormal lung tissue and function) testing for four employees (Employees E, G, J, and K) out of ten employees sampled for TB screening and for one sampled resident (Resident #52) out of five residents sampled for TB screening; failed to ensure one sampled resident's (Resident #33) foley catheter bag (a flexible tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine) was kept in a sanitary condition by allowing the foley bag to touch the floor; failed to ensure staff were using appropriate Personal Protective Equipment (PPE - safety gear worn to reduce exposure to substances) for one sampled resident (Resident #33) who was on Enhance Barrier (EBP - an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-23 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — pattern
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the audible signal from the call light at the west and east nurse's stations, was loud enough to be heard above ambient (surrounding on all sides) noise such as televisions which were on at the adjacent day rooms and in the adjacent resident rooms and conversations which happened at the nurse's stations. This practice potentially affected 10 residents in rooms where the call lights were activated. The facility census was 68 residents.1 1. Observation on 7/22/25 from 2:55 P.M. to 3:16 P.M. showed:-The call lights from resident rooms 116, 208, 200, 201, and 205 were activated.-There were two quick sounding beeps.-30 seconds went by and it beeped twice again.-The room number showed up on the wall device where the sound came out.-The sound repeated every 30 seconds in the same soft tone at the [NAME] nurse's station.During an interview on 7/22/25 at 3:23 P.M., Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) A said:-If there were televisions on in resident room [ROOM…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-23 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — isolated
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the lids of the dumpsters were closed on 7/22/25 and 7/23/25. The facility census was 68 residents.1. Observation on 7/22/24 at 11:09 A.M., and 3:48 P.M., showed the dumpsters in the dumpster area had the lids open. Observation on 7/23/25 at 11:46 A.M. and 12:49 P.M. showed the dumpsters in the dumpster area had the lids open. During an interview on 7/23/25 at 12:43 P.M., the Dietary Manager (DM) said:-He/She had to constantly remind personnel form other departments within the facility and personnel in the dietary department to keep the lids closed.-He/She expected any staff from any department to close the lids once they dumped trash in the dumpsters. During an interview on 7/23/25 at 2:31 P.M., the Administrator said facility staff should shut the lid of the dumpsters.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to prevent accidents for one sampled resident (Resident #1). Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) A failed to visualize the resident when performing the required midnight census safety rounds and Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) A failed to visualize the resident when doing two-hour nightly rounds. As a result, the resident self exited into the facility courtyard after dark, without staff awareness and fell from his/her wheelchair out of six sampled residents. The facility census was 62 residents. On 6/3/25, the facility Administration was notified of the past noncompliance which occurred on 5/31/25. Facility staff had subsequently been educated on hourly checks to courtyard, abuse, neglect, and two-hour rounding by CNAs. Alarms were ordered for the courtyard doors and additional lighting installed in the courtyard. The deficiency was corrected on 6/1/25. Review of the facility's Midnight Census policy dated 12/24 showed: -It…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-18 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
    Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent the misappropriation of 30 tablets of 2 milligrams (mg) Hydrocodone (an opioid pain medication used to treat moderate to severe pain) belonging to one sampled resident (Resident #2) out of four sampled residents. The facility census was 66 residents. The Administrator was notified on 9/18/24 of Past Non-Compliance which occurred on 9/3/24. An all nursing staff in-service was completed on drug diversion and working under the influence of drugs/alcohol by 9/3/24. The resident's missing medications were replaced and paid for by the facility. The deficiency was corrected 9/3/24. Review of the facility's Controlled Substance Policy revised 5/23 showed: -Controlled substances were subject to special handling, storage, disposal and record-keeping requirements. -The facility would maintain compliance with these special provisions. -Such drugs were to be accessible only to authorized nursing and pharmacy personnel. -The Director of Nurses…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-12 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide transportation to two scheduled follow up appointments for one sampled resident (Resident #2) out of four sampled residents. The facility census was 68 residents. A policy for outside appointments was requested from the facility's Director of Nursing (DON). He/she reported the facility had no policies related to outside appointments for residents. 1. Review of Resident #2's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS- a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff for care planning), dated 9/25/23, showed: -The resident scored a 05 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), an assessment tool that shows a score between 3 of 15 which shows the resident's mental status. This tool helps determine the resident's attention, orientation and ability to register and recall new information. These items are crucial factors in care planning decisions. --This showed the resident had severe cognitive impairment. Review of the resident's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-09-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure infection control to prevent cross contamination when staff failed to sanitize the access point of insulin pens prior to attaching the needle for two supplemental residents (Residents #26 and #38); to ensure infection control, including hand hygiene during wound dressing change for one sampled resident (Resident #46); to provide urinary catheter (a small tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine) care in a manner to prevent urinary tract infection and to ensure infection control practices were implemented to prevent cross contamination during perineal care on one sampled resident (Resident #32); to ensure hand hygiene during catheter care, colostomy (a surgically created opening for the large intestine, through the abdomen) care and wound care, failed to keep catheter tubing (clear tube that drains urine from the catheter to the catheter drainage bag) off the floor; to use a barrier for supplies during wound care for one…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 31 citations
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-15 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to have parameters listed in the medication orders for any medication containing Acetaminophen (an over-the-counter pain medication) or three sampled residents (Resident #12, Resident #17, and Resident #25) out of 18 sampled residents. The facility census was 70 residents. Review of the facility's undated Medication Administration-Oral checklist did not include parameters for medications. Review of the undated product information insert guide for Acetaminophen showed directions not to administer more than 3 grams (gm - 1 gm is equal to 1000 milligrams (mg)) in a 24 hour period. 1. Review of Resident #25's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS-a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff for care planning) dated 7/10/23 showed the resident used opioids (are substances that act on opioid receptors to produce morphine-like effects. Medically they are primarily used for pain relief) 7 out of 7 days in the the look-back period. Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-15 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR - a federal requirement to help ensure that individuals are not inappropriately placed in nursing homes for long term care) for one sampled resident (Resident #49) out of 18 sampled residents. The facility census was 70 residents. A policy for PASARR was requested from the facility and not provided. 1. Review of Resident #49's admission Record showed he/she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: -Senile degeneration of the brain (the mental deterioration (loss of intellectual ability) that is associated with or the characteristics of old age). -Generalized anxiety disorder (a condition of excessive worry about everyday issues and situations). -Cognitive communication deficit (difficulty with thinking and how someone uses language). -Stroke. -Dementia (a progressive organic mental disorder characterized by chronic personality disintegration, confusion,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-15 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow physician orders for a Low Air Loss Mattress (LAL- an air mattress covered with tiny holes which are designed to let out air very slowly which helps keep the skin dry and [NAME] away any moisture), to follow physician orders to apply topical medication to the resident's skin as needed for moisture and redness and to apply protective barrier cream after resident incontinent episodes with moisture associated skin breakdown per professional standards of practice for one sampled resident (Resident #32) out of 18 sampled residents. The facility census was 70 residents. A policy and procedure for physician orders, and use of barrier cream was requested and was not provided prior to exit from the facility. 1. Review of Resident #32's Face Sheet showed he/she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: -Clostridium Difficile (C-diff- a disruption of normal healthy bacteria in the colon, causing diarrhea, abdominal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-15 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure services to prevent and heel pressure ulcers (localized injury to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence, as a result of pressure, or pressure in combination with shear and/or friction) for two sampled residents (Resident #37 and #67) with pressure ulcers out of 18 sampled residents. The facility census was 70 residents. Review of www.medline.com/strategies/skin-health/evidence-based-best-practices-heels-npiap-guidelines-help-prevent-pressure-injuries/ dated July 2020 showed: -For residents at risk of heel pressure injuries (pressure ulcers) and/or with Stage I (Intact skin with non-blanchable redness of a localized area usually over a bony prominence) or Stage II (partial thickness loss of dermis presenting as a shallow open ulcer with a red or pink wound bed, without slough. It may also present as an intact or open/ruptured blister) pressure injuries, elevate the heels using a specifically designed heel…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-15 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure reconciliation of a Schedule II (a drug having medical usefulness, but also a high potential for abuse) narcotic drug (an opioid - a medication which acts on the central nervous system (CNS) to relieve pain) for one sampled resident (Resident #27) out of 20 sampled residents. The resident's Medication Administration Record (MAR) showed blank spaces which were discrepancies from the resident's Controlled Drug Receipt/Record/Disposition Form. The facility census was 70 residents. On 9/14/23, the Administrator was notified of the past noncompliance which took place over a period of time to include 8/29/23 through 9/8/23. Narcotic documentation discrepancies were discovered during audits by the Corporate Nurse Manager. Education to address the problem was provided to facility staff, including the Director of Nursing (DON) and Acting Director of Nursing (ADON) A and ADON B on 9/1/23 and 9/2/23. An internal audit was conducted on 9/8/23 and problems…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-15 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the medication administration error rate was less than five percent (5%) when staff failed to prime then insulin pen needle prior to administering insulin to two sampled residents (Residents #26 and #38) out of two sampled residents for insulin administration for an error rate of 9.68%. The facility census was 70 residents. A policy for insulin administration was requested and not received at the time of exit. Review of the product information guide for Lantus Insulin (a long acting insulin) updated 6/22 showed: -Do a safety test before each injection to make sure the pen and needle are working properly and the proper dose is administered. -Prime the needle with 2 units of insulin, if insulin comes out of the top of the needle, the pen and needle are working properly. Review of the product information guide for Novolog Insulin (a fast acting insulin) updated 2/2023 showed: -Before each injection, small amounts of air may collect in the cartridge during normal use. -To avoid injection air and to ensure…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-01-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 13. Record review of the facility's undated job description, Certified Nursing Assistant: showed: -The Staff was to wash hands before entering and after leaving an isolation room/area. -The Staff was to follow established procedures in the use and disposal of personal protective equipment. Observation of the Transitional Unit (unit where residents were kept when they returned from the hospital to ensure they did not have COVID-19) on 1/14/22 at 1:45 P.M., showed: -Certified Nurses Assistant (CNA) H came out of the Transitional unit through the zippered tarps without closing the tarps. -He/she walked 20 feet into the non-COVID-19 unit with full PPE on. -He/she was pushing the meal cart down the hallway. -He/she took off the isolation gown and gloves waded them up and stuck them in a hall handrail. -Without washing or sanitizing his/her hands entered a resident's room to pick up their lunch tray. During an interview on 1/14/22 at 1:50 P.M., CNA H said: -He/she had received education from the facility on COVID-19.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2022-01-19 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — widespread
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure two wells of Steam Table A in the kitchen operated properly to ensure suitable holding temperatures of 135 degrees Fahrenheit (°F) or higher, of food placed in two of three wells of Stem Table A, and to ensure the numbers of the dials on Steam table B, were visible to dietary staff. This practice potentially affected 72 out of 73 residents who ate food from the kitchen. The facility census was 73 residents. 1. Record review of the Maintenance log dated 11/23/21, 12/6/21, and 12/7/21, showed two wells of the Steam Table A have not been working. Record review of Maintenance Log dated 11/25/21, showed parts were ordered to fix Steam Table A. Record review of the Maintenance Log dated 1/7/22 showed two wells of Steam Table A that were also not operating properly on 12/7/21. Observations during the lunch meal preparation on 1/10/22 from 10:23 A.M. through 1:00 P.M., showed: - At 11:54 A.M., the temperature of the green beans on Steam Table A was 119.5 °F (degrees Fahrenheit) and the temperature of the corn…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-01-19 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — widespread
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all the necessary equipment was available for the facility to comply with the both the audible and visual requirements of the exception to state regulation 19 Code of State Regulations (CSR) 30-85.012 (124) and for facility staff to use, to adequately answer call lights. This practice potentially affected all residents. The facility census was 73 residents. 1. Record review of the facility's exception certificate, dated 5/31/18, showed: -The operator will ensure the wireless nurse call system is fully operational twenty-four (24) hours per day, seven (7) days a week. -The operator will maintain, at a minimum and in accordance with the manufacturer's recommendations, all the features of the wireless call system. -The operator will ensure that all direct care staff carry and utilize the wireless nurse call pagers or phones at all times. Record review of a grievance report form dated 8/25/21 showed Resident #17 wrote: - Aides not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-01-19 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — pattern
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure physician's orders for wound care for a resident's pressure ulcer (localized injury to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence, as a result of pressure, or pressure in combination with shear and/or friction) was completed as prescribed for three sampled residents (Residents #33, #36 and #67) out of 19 sampled residents. The facility census was 73 residents. Record review of the facility's Pressure Ulcer/Pressure Injury Prevention policy revised on 3/2021 did not address documentation of wound care treatments. 1. Record review of Resident #36's Face Sheet showed he/she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Record review of the resident's Care Plan dated 11/29/21 showed: -He/She was admitted to the facility with pressure ulcers. --Staff were to administer medications as ordered. --Staff were to administer treatments as ordered and monitor for effectiveness. -He/She had an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-01-19 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff were awake and assisting residents during their shift when staff were found sitting in chairs wrapped in blankets with one staff slumped over in the chair with his/her eyes closed and mouths hanging open. The facility census was 73 residents. 1. Observation of the rehabilitation and transitional units on 1/13/22 at 5:00 A.M. showed: -Three high back chairs at the end of the hall out of facility camera range. -Agency Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) K and Agency CNA L were each sitting in a high back chair wrapped up in blankets with their eyes opened. -CNA M was sitting in the third chair, was wrapped up in a blanket, slumped over in the chair with his/her eyes closed and mouth hanging open sleeping. -One Agency Registered Nurse (RN) working on the unit. -No other staff were located as assigned and working on the unit. During an interview on 1/13/22 at 5:05 A.M., Agency RN E said: -The three CNAs were not on break and had been sitting in the same spot wrapped up in blankets sleeping most of the shift. -CNA M…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-01-19 · tag F0732 — pattern
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to post staffing information in a location that was easily accessible to residents on the Long Term Care (LTC) and Rehabilitation units of the facility and to ensure staffing data was posted for visitors that consistently included the facility name, daily census, and the actual hours worked per shift for each of the three categories of nursing employees: Registered Nurses (RNs), Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs), and Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs)/Certified Medication Technicians (CMTs) directly responsible for resident care. The facility census was 73 residents. Record review of the facility's Posting Direct Care Daily Staffing Numbers policy, revised 2/2021, showed the facility will post the staffing on a daily basis at the beginning of each shift showing: -The date and daily census. -Information will be listed for each of the following staff: RN, LPN, and CNA. -Actual hours worked and the total number of hours will be posted. -Information will be clear and legible and posted in a prominent place readily accessible to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-01-19 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — pattern
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain and follow-up on medication regimen reviews (MRR) for three sampled residents (Resident #7, #11, and #21) out of 19 sampled residents. The facility census was 73 residents. Record review of the facility's undated policy titled Distribution of Medication Regimen Review report showed: -The consultant pharmacist would report any recommendations of apparent irregularities resulting from the medication regimen review report form or in electronic record keeping system. -Each recommendation must be acted upon. -The report form will be used by the consultant pharmacist to communicate findings of the monthly pharmaceutical care consultation. -The policy did not specify any time frames for responses and actions or steps that must be taken when an irregularity requires urgent action. -The report would be forwarded to the Director of Nursing (DON). -The attending physician and/or medical director will document their review and response to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-01-19 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — pattern
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an order signed by the resident's physician was transcribed to the resident's Physician's Order Sheet (POS) and Medication Administration Record (MAR) resulting in staff administering a medication which had been discontinued for one sampled resident (Resident #11); to monitor blood sugars (the concentration of glucose in the blood) and administer Insulin (a hormone that lowers the level of glucose (a type of sugar) in the blood) as ordered for two sampled residents (Resident #49 and #53) out of 19 sampled residents. The facility census was 73 residents. Record review of the facility's undated Distribution of Medication Regimen Review (MRR) Report showed: -Physician responses resulting in changes in the resident's medication therapy for an individual resident will be forwarded to the Director of Nursing (DON) or facility nurses. The order will be transcribed in the POS or documented in electronic record keeping system and the nurse will order the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-01-19 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an unattended medication cart was locked and a loose pill was not left on the floor. The facility census was 73 residents. Record review of the facility's Medication Storage in the Facility policy dated [DATE] showed: -Medication carts and medications supplies were to be locked and attended by authorized personnel or locked. -Medications that were not stored within secure closures shall be removed from inventory and disposed of according to drug disposal procedures. 1. Observation on [DATE] from 9:03 A.M. to 10:41 A.M. showed: -9:03 A.M. to 9:58 A.M., three medication carts at the end of the hall near the nurse's station were unlocked and unattended. One medication cart had a resident's intravenous (IV) bag of medication on top of the cart unattended. -9:58 A.M., Registered Nurse (RN) C was at the medication cart, then left the cart with the medication still on top of the cart and the carts unlocked and unattended. -9:59 A.M. to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-01-19 · tag F0800 — pattern
    Provide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain corn and green beans at a temperature of 135 degrees Fahrenheit (°F) at the steam table, during the lunch meal on 1/10/22; to maintain the temperature of the macaroni salad at or below a temperature of 41 °F during the lunch meal on 1/10/22; to maintain the temperature of bacon at a temperature of 135 °F on the steam table during the breakfast meal on 1/12/22. This practice potentially affected at least 72 residents who at food from the kitchen during those meals. The facility census was 73 residents. 1. Record review of the maintenance log showed the steam table has not been working since December 2021, two wells of steam table not working. Observations during the lunch meal preparation on 1/10/22 from 10:23 A.M. through 1:00 P.M., showed: - At 11:46 A.M., the temperature of the macaroni salad was 45.1 °F. - At 11:54 A.M., the temperature of the green beans on the steam table was 119.5 °F and the temperature of the corn was 123.4 °F. - At 12:10 P.M., the temperature of the macaroni salad was 45.2 °F.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-01-19 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — pattern
    Provide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the timely delivery of breakfast and lunch meals to eleven residents (Residents #65, #5, #53, #15, #318, #69, #56, #22, #28, #38 and #35) on 1/10/22 and on 1/12/22; and failed to ensure the meal ticket system worked properly to facilitate meal ticket orders. The facility census was 73 residents. 1. Record review of the facility's undated meal schedule showed meal pass times of 8:00 A.M. for breakfast and 12:00 P.M. for lunch. 2. Observation on 1/10/22 at 9:53 A.M. and 10:20 A.M., showed Resident #65 was in his/her recliner waiting on breakfast since 7:00 A.M. At 10:20 A.M., facility staff discussed that they did not have the Resident's breakfast. During an interview on 1/10/22 at 10:37 A.M., Resident #65, a resident identified by his/her admission Minimum Data Set (MDS-a federally mandated assessment tool required to be completed by facility staff for care planning) dated 1/2/22, as a resident who understood others, was able to make…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-01-19 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a system to ensure hot foods that should be hot at breakfast and lunch, were served to residents at a temperature at or close to 120 degrees Fahrenheit (ºF). This practice potentially affected 72 residents who ate food prepared by the kitchen. The facility census was 73 residents. Record review of the facility's policy entitled Healthcare Culinary Group and Lifestyles, dated 1/1/21 showed: -All food items are evaluated for proper food temperature, taste and appearance prior to meal service. -Food and drinks should be palatable attractive and served at a safe and appetizing temperature, as determined by the type of food, to ensure patients'/residents' satisfaction. -All food (including pureed) will be tasted to evaluate flavor and consistency. -Any problems must be corrected prior to meal service. -If the product is unacceptable a substitution must be made. -When food is transported to a remote serving location, final cook…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-01-19 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to do the following: place a label on foods that were not easily identifiable; maintain the floors under the preparation table and the steam table free of debris, and food particles; maintain the ceiling vents over the food preparation area, free of dust; maintain the cucumbers free of mold; to prevent cross contamination by using the same spatula for turning the burgers and removing the burgers from the griddle; maintain three cutting boards free from numerous grooves and areas that were not easily cleanable; to check the temperature of sausage patties before they were pulled from the griddle. This practice potentially affected at least 70 residents who ate food from the kitchen. The facility census was 73 residents. 1. Observations of the lunch meal preparation on 1/10/22 from 9:25 A.M. through 1:20 P.M., showed: - Shredded food in a plastic bag that was not easily identifiable in the walk-in refrigerator. - A heavy layer of dust on the fan vent covers in the walk-in refrigerator -The presence of mold on the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-01-19 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. Record review of Resident #172's census log showed he/she admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Record review of the resident's vaccine tab in the electronic health record (EHR) showed no documentation regarding the resident's status of the influenza vaccine. Record review of the resident's hospital discharge instructions dated 1/4/22 showed no documentation regarding the influenza vaccine. Record review of the resident's EHR showed no documentation regarding the influenza vaccine being offered, declined or received. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to offer or administer the influenza vaccine for four sampled residents (Residents #52, #172, #68 and #277) and to offer or administer the pneumonia vaccine for two sampled residents (Residents #68 and #277) out of 19 sampled residents. Five residents were sampled for immunizations. The facility census was 73 residents. Record review of the facility's policy Influenza Vaccine Program dated 2019 showed: -Policy of the facility that annually…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-01-19 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent the existence of a negative balance for one discharged resident (Resident #173). The facility census was 73 residents. 1. Record review of the facility's Current Account Balance dated 1/13/22 showed Resident #173 had a negative balance of $18.00. During an interview on 1/20/22 at 11:55 A.M., the Regional Financial Analyst said: - The resident did not have a trust account at that time when he/she resided at the facility. - The previous Business Office Manager (BOM) used funds from the resident trust, to pay for hair care for Resident #173. - The facility should have contacted that resident's family or could have paid for that resident's hair care out of facility funds.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-01-19 · tag F0569 — isolated
    Notify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to submit a Third Party Liability (TPL) form (a form which is sent to Missouri (MO) Health Net, which gives an accounting of the remaining balance of that resident's funds in the resident trust account), which is required to be sent within 30 days after death, to MO Health Net after the death of one sampled resident (Resident #123), 125 days prior to the date of the resident fund review on [DATE]; and to submit the balance of the resident's funds to the estate of one sampled resident (Resident #127), who was a private pay resident. The facility census was 73 residents. 1. Record review of the clinical facility census dated [DATE] showed Resident #123 expired on [DATE]. Record review of the resident's resident trust statement, showed he/she had a balance of $1,288.36 in his/her account on date of his/her death. During an interview on [DATE] at 11:38 A.M., the Regional Financial Analyst (RFA) said: - A TPL form was not sent as of the date of the resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-01-19 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
    Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from misappropriation of property when one bottle of Lorazepam (Ativan - an anti-anxiety medication) was missing and another bottle of Ativan had eight milliliters (ml) of medication that was unaccounted for during shift change narcotic count for one sampled resident (Resident #50), and there was also a discrepancy in the documentation of the amount of Lorazepam dispensed to the resident and the facility also had medication that appeared to have been replaced with a watery substance for two sampled residents (Resident #37 and #50) out of 17 sampled residents. The facility census was 72 residents. Record review of the facility's policy, Controlled Substance Policy, dated February 2021, showed: -Controlled substances in Schedules II, III and IV (Controlled substances include opiods, stimulants, depressants, hallucinogens, and anabolic steroids) were subject to special handling, storage, disposal and record-keeping…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-01-19 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide medications and treatments as prescribed by the physician for two sampled residents (Resident# 2 and #59) out of 19 sampled residents. The facility census was 73 residents. Record review of the facility's policy, Medication Administration, dated May 2019 showed: -The staff was to obtain and record any vital signs as necessary prior to medication administration. -The staff was to give the resident the medication. -The staff was to remain with the resident to ensure that the medication was swallowed. -The staff was to circle initials on the Medications Administration Record (MAR) if a medication was not given as ordered and record the reason in the as needed (PRN)/Omission Medication section of the MAR. 1. Record review of Resident #2's face sheet showed he/she was admitted on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: -Pneumonia (an infection in the lungs which may fill up with fluid). -Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD a group…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-01-19 · tag F0661 — isolated
    Ensure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a discharge summary which included a recapitulation of the residents stay, and a reconciliation of the resident's post-discharge medication for one sampled closed record resident (Resident #72) out of three closed record residents. The facility census was 73 residents. Record review of the Discharge Summary and Plan policy reviewed 2/2021 states: -The Discharge Plan, Instructions, & Summary provides a recapitulation or summary of the resident's stay. -Discharge planning will begin upon admission to the Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF) and include family/caregiver plan for discharge. -Social Service Director or Social Service Designee will initiate and update the discharge plan in the Care Plan section of the resident's record. -Discharge Plan, Instructions, & Summary will include: --Completed by the interdisciplinary team. Copy of the assessment will be given to resident, family/caregiver on discharge from the SNF. --Social Service Director or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-01-19 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide assistance with toe nail clipping for one sampled resident (Resident #7) and did not provide assistance for activities of daily living for one sampled resident (Resident # 2) out of 19 sampled residents. The facility census was 73 residents. The facility did not have a policy related to nail care. Record review of the facility's undated job description, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) showed: -The staff was to assist residents with bath function as directed. -The staff was to assist residents with dressing as necessary. -The staff was to keep the residents dry change gown, clothing, linen when it becomes wet or soiled. -The staff was to assist in transporting the residents to/from appointments. -The staff was to perform after meal care, clean the resident's hands, face, clothing, brush teeth as needed. 1. Record review of Resident #7's care plan originated upon his/her date of admission on [DATE] showed the resident required…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-01-19 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure wound assessments were completed, to document treatments were completed, and to provide wound care for two sampled residents (Resident #59 and Resident #279) out of 19 sampled residents. They facility census was 73 residents. The facility policy was requested but was not provided. 1. Record review of Resident #59's face sheet showed he/she was admitted on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: -Sepsis (a life threatening complication of an infection) due to Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus (MRSA - a group of bacteria that are difficult to treat as they are resistant to antibiotics). -Local infection of the skin and subcutaneous tissue (an infection that affects one part of the body). -Non-pressure chronic ulcer of the left foot (areas on the skin that have tissue damage that has caused skin loss leaving a raw wound that takes a long time to heal). -Cellulitis of the left lower limb (a bacterial skin infection that causes…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-01-19 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident with a Foley catheter (a tube with retaining balloon passed through the urethra into the bladder to drain urine) had orders for the Foley catheter to include the reason for the catheter and for catheter care, and to provide catheter care for one sampled resident (Resident #36) out of 19 sampled residents. The facility census was 73 residents. Record review of the facility's Urinary Catheter Care policy dated 1/2017 showed: -The purpose of the procedure was to prevent catheter associated urinary tract infections. -Documentation should include the date and time catheter care was given. -The policy did not include what should be included on the order for a Foley catheter. 1. Record review of Resident #36's Face Sheet showed he/she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: -Obstructive and reflux uropathy (a condition in which the urine flow is obstructed and the backward flow of urine…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-01-19 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident with a Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy tube (PEG tube - a tube that is placed into a patient's stomach as a means of feeding them when they were unable to eat) had orders for care, cleaning, and monitoring of the PEG tube site for one sampled resident (Resident #36), and failed to provide PEG tube care for two sampled residents (Resident #36 and #11) out of 19 sampled residents. The facility census was 73 residents. A policy for PEG tube care and PEG tube orders was requested and not received. 1. Record review of Resident #36's Face Sheet showed he/she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with a diagnosis of having a gastrostomy tube (PEG). Record review of the resident's Care Plan dated 11/29/21 showed: -He/she had a gastrostomy tube and received water flushes only. -Staff were directed to check for tube placement per orders. -Staff were directed to provide local care to the PEG site per…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-01-19 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate was less than five percent (%). Two medication errors were observed out of 27 opportunities for an error rate of 7.4%. The facility census was 73 residents. Record review of the facility Medication Administration policy dated 5/2019 showed: -Staff should review the resident's Medication Administration Record (MAR). -Read and follow any special directions on the label. -Administer the medication and document the medication administration in the resident's MAR. Record review of the product insert for Humalog insulin (a fast acting insulin) dated 4/2020 showed the medication should be administered 15 minutes before or immediately after a meal. Record review of the product insert for Novolg insulin dated 7/2021 showed the medication should be administered within five to 10 minutes before a meal. 1. Record review of Resident #49's Face Sheet showed he/she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-01-19 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure sausage was pureed (to make food into a paste or thick liquid suspension usually made from cooked food that was ground finely) to a smooth pudding or soft mashed potato consistency in accordance with the pureed sausage recipe. This practice potentially affected one sampled resident with a pureed diet. The facility census was 73 residents. 1. Record review of the undated pureed sausage recipe for 5 servings of pureed sausage showed: Ingredients: --5 sausage patties. --1/4 teaspoon of pork base. --½ cup hot water. --2 ½ pieces of toast. Directions showed: --Dissolve pork base in water to make broth. --Place prepared sausage patty, broth and toast in a washed and sanitized food processor. --Blend until smooth. --Reheat to greater than 165 degrees Fahrenheit(°F) Observation on 1/12/22 at 9:49 A.M., showed Dietary [NAME] (DC) D pureed sausage. -No recipe book was open for DC D to follow. -DC D pureed the sausage for about 1 minute. -DC D did not reheat the pureed sausage to 165 °F. Observation on 1/12/22 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$15,646 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $15,646 — penalty dated 2024-03-19

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to TUTERA SENIOR LIVING & HEALTH CARE — 25 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 3 of 52.0+1.0 vs chain
Health inspection 3 of 52.2+0.8 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 51.7+0.3 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 53.0+1.0 vs chain
The other 24 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.0★, per CMS)
1 of 5Bethany Rehab & HccDekalb, IL 1 of 5Carlinville Rehab & HccCarlinville, IL 1 of 5Coulterville Rehab & HccCoulterville, IL 1 of 5Crystal Pines Rehab & HccCrystal Lake, IL 1 of 5Fair Oaks Rehab & HealthcareSouth Beloit, IL 1 of 5Grand Meadows Senior Living & Health CareAsbury, IA 1 of 5Hillsboro Rehab & HccHillsboro, IL 1 of 5Mattoon Rehab & HccMattoon, IL 1 of 5Metropolis Rehab & HccMetropolis, IL 1 of 5Moweaqua Rehab & HccMoweaqua, IL 1 of 5St Paul's Senior CommunityBelleville, IL 1 of 5Windsor Estates Of St CharlesSaint Charles, MO 2 of 5The Village At MissionPrairie Village, KS 2 of 5Westview Of Derby Rehabilitation & Health Care CenDerby, KS 3 of 5Dixon Rehab & HccDixon, IL 3 of 5Highland Rehabilitation & Health Care CenterKansas City, MO 3 of 5Lakeland Rehab & Healthcare CenterEffingham, IL 3 of 5Meridian Rehabilitation And Health Care CenterWichita, KS 3 of 5Monterey Park Rehabilitation & Health Care CenterIndependence, MO 3 of 5NorterreLiberty, MO 3 of 5Northland Rehabilitation & Health Care CenterKansas City, MO 3 of 5Stratford Commons Rehab & Health Care CenterOverland Park, KS 3 of 5Tiffany Springs Rehabilitation & Health Care CenteKansas City, MO 5 of 5Charlton Place Rehab And Healthcare CenterDeatsville, AL

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
BROOKS, KILEYIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 06/01/2022
GANNON, JEFFIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 06/01/2022
WALNUT CREEK MANAGEMENT COMPANY LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 06/01/2022

CMS files one row per role, so the 5 rows in the source record cover these 3 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$10.6M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-0.4%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$2.4M
Related-party expense22% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 39%Medicare 19%Other / private 42%

This home reported $2.4M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 22% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$407per resident / day
operating cost
$12,377per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$405per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MO

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Missouri Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Missouri
$6,741/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$7,604/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,400/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 265861. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-07-23, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next