No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Tiffany Springs Rehabilitation & Health Care Cente

9191 N Ambassador Drive, Kansas City, MO 64154 · For profit - Corporation · 120 certified beds · (816) 741-5570 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Resident-funds citations (F0567, F0569)1 immediate-jeopardy citation$48,152 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • it has citations for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0567, F0569)
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (44) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $48,152 in federal fines (most recent 2026-01-23)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★★ 5/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
5844 NW Barry Rd · (816) 932-5100 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
9040 N Skyview Ave · (816) 410-2941 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Aldi<0.1 mi
8780 N Ambassador Dr · (855) 955-2534 · Call to confirm hours
Park
7898 N Hull Ave · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
4800 NW 88th St · (816) 741-1444

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased8.7%18.1%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight3.0%5.3%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%1.1%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection3.6%2.3%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms16.1%18.5%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury4.2%4.1%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened10.9%17.4%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication33.8%25.6%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine88.8%90.9%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers4.7%4.5%4.7%typical
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control21.9%17.8%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table11.8%23.5%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.5%2.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine36.4%63.5%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission23.0%26.0%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit2.9%13.7%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.542.111.67typical
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.522.331.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

52.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 216 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

52.0%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
12.8%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
58.1%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.37U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.19hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.15hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 58.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 117 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.37 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 64% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 31% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF52.0%CMS range 45.7–59.251.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF12.8%CMS range 9.7–16.110.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge58.1%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge56.4%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge35.9%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified98.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting98.2%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay1.3%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened2.6%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization5.7%CMS range 3.3–9.47.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.921.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.39
RN hours/ resident / day
1.03
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.32
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.73
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.23
RN hoursweekends
47.0%
Total nursing turnover
54.5%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 113.2 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 7 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.73 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.39 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.32 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.27 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.92 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.46 to 0.23 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 47% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

10
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-01-23)
11
at the previous standard inspection (2024-10-04)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

44 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 31 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-06-17 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — isolated
    Provide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to perform life saving measures to include Cardio-pulmonary resuscitation (CPR) for one sampled resident (Resident #1) when staff found the full code resident without a pulse or respirations. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure the staff knew safety protocols and emergency procedures when Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) A did not know where to locate the crash cart (a cart that contains emergency equipment). The facility census was 117. The administrator was notified on [DATE] at 4:51 P.M. of an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) which began on [DATE]. The IJ was removed on [DATE] as confirmed by surveyor on-site verification. Review of the facility's Emergency Procedures/Cardio-Pulmonary Resuscitation Policy, revised, February 2022, showed: -Any unnecessary interruptions in chest compressions decreases the effectiveness of CPR; -If a resident is found unresponsive and not breathing normally, a licensed staff member will verify the code status using the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2026-02-26 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to prevent the development of an unstageable pressure injury (a severe, full-thickness wound where the base is completely covered by dead tissue) for one resident (Resident #2), of 6 sampled residents, when the facility failed to periodically check the resident's skin under a removable medical device for more than 20 days and the resident required surgery to clean the wound. The facility census was 115. Review of the facility policy titled, Skin Identification, Evaluation, and Monitoring, dated 2/2026 showed:-The purpose of this policy is to outline a method of identification, evaluation and monitoring for alterations in skin integrity, Communities will implement preventative measures and an individualized care plan will be formulated upon completion of findings;-A licensed nurse will evaluate the skin integrity through a physical skin evaluation upon admission, weekly and when a significant change is identified;-The nursing assistant will…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2024-12-31 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure three residents (Resident #1, #2, and #5) received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice when the facility failed to provide timely lab testing with results. Two residents (Resident #2 & #5) were admitted to the hospital with septic shock. The facility also failed to obtain lab testing for one resident (Resident #1) who was without his/her psychotropic medication for fourteen days when the pharmacy would not provide the medication without lab results. The facility also failed to follow physician's orders for the resident when they did not administer psychotropic medication. The sample size was six residents. The facility census was 111. A policy regarding professional standards of care was requested but not provided. Review of the laboratory services agreement, dated 8/1/24, showed: -Lab will travel to location to draw and/or collect patient specimens for duly ordered tests and will transport the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-17 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to follow their Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) Policy and failed to follow the documented wishes for Resident #1, when a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) performed CPR on the resident when the resident had a documented and physician signed Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) order. The facility census was 111. Review of the facility policy titled, Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation, dated 03/2025 showed if a resident was found unresponsive and no breathing normally, a clinical staff member will verify code status using the clinical record. If the resident is a DNR, per medical record, notify the attending provider. Review of the facility policy titled, Resident Rights, dated 12/2024 showed each resident residing in this community has the right and will be afforded the right to a dignified existence, and self determination. Each resident will have autonomy and choice, about how each resident wishes to live his/her everyday life and receipt of care.Review of Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-23 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed promote each resident's right to self-determination when the facility failed to provide services to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene in accordance with resident preferences for two residents (Resident #76 and #92) out of 24 sampled residents. The facility census was 116.Review showed the facility did not provide a policy related to showers.1. Review of Resident #76's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 10/30/25, showed:- The resident was cognitively intact;- Required assistance with showering, bathing, and toileting;- Diagnoses included: seizures, diabetes, and heart failure. Review of the Resident's care plan, dated 01/09/26, showed:- The resident preferred a shower on Wednesdays and Saturdays in the evening;- Required two staff participation with bathing;- Staff were required to keep the resident's routine consistent, skin clean, dry, and well…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-01-23 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement policies and procedures to ensure resident's trust fund accounts were not allowed to go into a negative balance which affected one resident (Resident #28) and when the facility failed to refund resident funds within 30 days of discharge for six residents (Residents #123, #124, #125, #126, #127, and #128). The facility census was 116. Review of facility policy Resident Trust Fund Policy, revised [DATE], showed:- Refund checks for discharged or expired residents must be completed within 5 business days of the resident discharge. Per state regulations, a completed discharge/trust fund accounting form reflecting discharge date and monies disbursed must be sent to the caseworker within 5 business days.- The Resident Fund bank account must be reconciled monthly immediately upon receipt of the bank statement. - The facility shall require all monies, either spent on behalf of the resident or withdrawn by the resident or his/her legal representative…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-01-23 · tag F0569 — pattern
    Notify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify four residents (Resident #16, #23, #75, and #106) when they were within $200.00 of the Social Security Income (SSI) limit ($6,068.80) or when the resident's account was over the SSI limit. This affected four of 24 residents sampled. Facility census was 116. Review of the facility policy, Facility Resident Trust Fund Policy, revised May 2012, showed any individual Resident Trust Account that is nearing the state specified maximum balance will require notification to the Resident/Responsible part via Form letter.1. Review of Resident #16's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated assessment tool completed by facility staff), dated 12/30/25, showed:- Resident was cognitively intact;- Diagnoses: coronary artery disease, heart failure, kidney disease, diabetes, anxiety disorder, depression, and dementia;Review of the Resident's Monthly Trust Fund Account Balance, showed:- January 2025 $6366.00, which is over the SSI income limit;-…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-23 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide services or care that adhere to accepted standards of quality when the facility failed to properly manage pain, provide medication as ordered by a physician, failed to notify physician of unavailability of pain medication, failed to obtain medication from emergency medication kit on site for one Resident (Resident #100), and failed to follow physician's orders for Residents #9, #94, #113 and failed to implement Diabetes management for Resident #9. This affected four sampled residents out of 24 sampled. The facility census was 116.Review of the facility's Medication Administration Policy dated May 2019, showed staff to administer all medications to overcome illness and to relieve and prevent symptoms as per physician order.Review of the facility policy titled Ordering Medications Policy dated May 2019, showed refill requests can be faxed, sent via Electronic Health Record system, and/or left on the pharmacy refill voicemail.Review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-23 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure dependent residents who were unable to carry out their own activities of daily living (ADLs) received the necessary services to maintain good personal hygiene when staff did not provide complete perineal care for two sampled residents, (Resident #13 and #6). This affected two of 24 sampled residents (Resident #13, and #6). The facility census was 116. Review of the facility's Activities of Daily Living Policy dated, 09/04/25, showed this facility provides each resident with care according to the resident's care plan and the resident's ability to perform activities of daily living including bathing, dressing, grooming and toileting. 1.Review of Resident #13's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 12/10/25, showed:-Severe cognitive impairment;-Extensive assistance of two staff members for bed mobility, transfers, toileting and personal hygiene;-Incontinent of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-23 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were served food that was palatable, safe, and at an appetizing temperature during meal service. This affected 2 of 24 sampled residents (Residents #22 and #95). The facility census was 116.Request for facility policy on cooking and dining food temperatures was not provided for review.1. Review of Resident #22's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 11/17/25, showed:- Resident was cognitively intact;- Diagnoses: heart failure, Parkinson's Disease, anxiety disorder, depression, and respiratory failure;During an interview on 1/20/26 at 9:27 A.M., the Resident said the food is cold and this can happen at all meal times. Some of the food is very spicy, he/she normally eats in his/her room. He/she would prefer to have his/her food be hotter than what he/she receives it2. Review of Resident #95's Quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], showed:- He/she was not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-01-23 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the bathroom exhaust vents were free of excess dust in residents' rooms. This affected 11 rooms. The facility census was 116.Observation on 1/20/26 starting at 11:17 A.M., showed the bathroom exhaust vents covered in dirt in:- room [ROOM NUMBER];- room [ROOM NUMBER];- room [ROOM NUMBER];- room [ROOM NUMBER];- room [ROOM NUMBER];- room [ROOM NUMBER];- room [ROOM NUMBER];- room [ROOM NUMBER];- room [ROOM NUMBER];- room [ROOM NUMBER];- room [ROOM NUMBER]. During an interview on 1/21/26 at 3:08 P.M., the Maintenance Director said they cleaned the bathroom exhaust vent twice a year. It was last done in July to August in 2025. He thought the maintenance staff may have started and then got called away to other jobs and not completed the task for all exhaust vents, that was why some of them had so much dirt on them.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-23 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a baseline care plan for one resident (Resident #113), when staff did not care plan pain control. This affected one of 24 sampled residents. The facility census was 116. Review of the facility's Care Plan Policy dated 12/2024, showed: The purpose is to assess strengths, weakness and care needs for each resident that will assist the staff and resident in achieving and maintaining the highest practical level of mental functioning, physical functioning, and wellbeing as possible.1.Review of Resident #113's admission MDS., dated 1/6/26 showed:-Not cognitively intact;-Incontinent of bowel and bladder;-Partial to moderate assistance needed for toileting, toilet hygiene, dressing, transfers and mobility when in bed;-He/She reported frequent pain during the last five days;-Diagnoses included fracture of left lower leg with repair, pain due to internal orthopedic prosthetic devices and cognitive communication deficit. Review of the resident's care plan dated 1/8/26 showed:-He/She was at risk of skin breakdown…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-23 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement and monitor interventions put into place for one resident with significant unplanned weight loss (Resident #97) to prevent the resident from further weight loss when staff failed to offer Super Cereal (a highly nutritious, calorie-dense food to prevent malnutrition) and a Magic Cup (a high-protein nutritional treat designed to fight malnutrition) and when the staff failed document in the resident's medical record that the prescribed diet had not been consumed. Staff additionally failed to notify the resident's physician and the Registered Dietitian (RD) when the prescribed diet had not been consumed. This affected one of 24 sampled residents. The facility census was 116. Review of the Facility's Nutrition and Unplanned Weight Loss policy dated, December 2024 showed:-The nursing staff will monitor and document the weight and dietary intake of residents;-The threshold for significant unplanned weight loss will be based on the following criteria: 1 month - 5% weight loss is significant; 3 months - 7.5 %…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 31 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe and sanitary environment when facility staff did not apply Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) when they provided care and treatment for one resident (Resident #13). This affected one of 24 sampled residents (Resident #13). The facility census was 116.Review of the facility's undated, Enhanced Barrier Precautions policy, showed:-Enhanced barrier precautions (EPB) are recommended for residents with any of the following: o Wounds; o Indwelling medical devices; o High contact care activities;-High contact care activities when a gown and gloves should be worn include: o Bathing/showering; o Changing bed linens; o Changing briefs; o Assisting with toileting. 1. Review of Resident #13's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 12/10/25, showed:- Severe cognitive impairment;- Extensive assistance of two staff members for bed mobility, transfers, toileting and personal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-11 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — isolated
    Provide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review the facility failed to honor a resident's choice for a Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) advanced directive when the facility staff performed Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR), an emergency lifesaving procedure performed when the heart stops beating, and notified EMS (Emergency Medical Services) to complete all life saving measures because the facility failed to ensure the DNR had been entered into the resident's physician orders and medical record accurately. The facility census was 108.On [DATE], the Administrator was notified of the past noncompliance incident which occurred on [DATE]. On [DATE], facility administration was notified of the incident, an investigation immediately began, and corrective actions were implemented to include:- 100% audit all current residents for proper code status orders and advance directives;- All nursing staff educated on advance directive policy including: * All residents should have an advance directive order in place; * All residents advance…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · E2024-12-31 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — pattern
    Provide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide necessary laboratory services for residents when they did not ensure residents needs were met with timely collection and reporting of laboratory results. This occurred when the facility failed to obtain lab testing for one resident (Resident #1) who was without his/her psychotropic medication for fourteen days when the pharmacy would not provide the medication without lab results. The facility also failed to ensure urine cultures for residents with potential urinary tract infections (UTI) were collected by the laboratory company, tested, and results received by the facility so the physician's could properly treat infections Residents #1, #2, #3, #4, #5, and #6 for signs and symptoms of UTI. The facility additionally failed to provide timely lab testing with results for two residents (Resident #2 & #5). The facility also failed to ensure sufficient laboratory testing supplies were available for staff, when the facility had no urine…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-10-04 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe food handling practices, food was labeled, dated, and sealed in cold storage, and the kitchen was kept in a clean and sanitary manner. These failures had the potential to increase the prevalence and spread of foodborne illness and infection among all 116 facility residents. The facility census was 116. Findings include: Review of the facility's undated policy titled, Hand Washing & Glove Usage, revealed Employees would wash their hands before and after handling foods. Gloves were to be used whenever direct food contact was needed. Hands were to have been washed before putting them on and after removing gloves. Review of the facility's undated policy titled, Cleaning Schedule, revealed items to have been cleaned after each use included cutting boards, worktables, and counters; items to have been cleaned daily included stove top, grill, kitchen floors, microwave oven, steam table, food carts, and the exterior of large…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-10-04 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — pattern
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure pain medication and timely interventions were provided for three of three residents (Residents (R) 107, R82, and R4) reviewed for pain management of 27 sample residents. This failure placed residents at risk of harm when pain was not assessed, monitored, with timely interventions provided. The facility census was 116. Findings include: 1. Review of R107's admission Record located under the Profile tab of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed R107 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included malignant neoplasm of the splenic flexure (the bend where the transverse colon and the descending colon meet in the upper left portion of the abdomen), liver cirrhosis, and deep vein thrombosis (DVT). Review of R107's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) located under the MDS tab of the EMR revealed R107 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15 which indicated she was cognitively intact and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-10-04 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review, interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents who received a pureed diet of 116 total residents were served foods prepared in a pureed form to meet their needs. This failure had the potential to cause choking, aspiration [inhalation of food into the lungs], malnutrition, weight loss, or dissatisfaction with meals. The facility census was 116. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Therapeutic Diets, dated January 2017, revealed Mechanically altered diets, as well as diets modified for medical or nutritional needs, will be considered 'therapeutic' diets. Review of the facility's Order Listing Report, dated 10/04/24 and provided on paper, revealed five residents received a pureed diet. Review of the facility's Diet Extensions - Friday Week 4 menu, provided by the facility, revealed residents who received pureed foods were to receive pureed sausage links during breakfast on 10/04/24. During observation of the tray line in the kitchen on 10/04/24 beginning at 8:06 AM, revealed Cook1 served residents with a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-04 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the physician was notified when pain medications were unavailable to be administered per physician's order for one of three residents (Resident (R) 4) reviewed for pain of 27 sample residents. This failure had the potential to contribute to uncontrolled pain and fall risk. The facility census was 116. Findings include: Review of R4's admission Record, located under the Profile tab of the electronic medical record (EMR), revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including: polymyalgia rheumatica (a chronic inflammatory disorder that causes pain and stiffness in the neck, shoulders, and hips); chronic pain syndrome; rheumatoid arthritis; dementia; depression, and anxiety. Review of R4's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 08/15/24 and located in the MDS tab of the EMR, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10 out of 15 which indicated the resident was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-04 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who had a negative Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) Level I and then later had a significant change in status with a new serious mental illness diagnosis was accurately and timely referred for a PASARR Level II for one of two residents (Resident (R) 29) reviewed for PASARRs out of 27 sample residents. This failure placed the residents at risk of qualifying for specialized services but not receiving the services due to the inaccuracy of the PASARR Level I. The facility census was 116. Findings include: During an interview on 10/03/24 at 2:00 PM, the Administrator revealed the facility had no policy on PASARR. Review of R29's admission Record, located in the resident's electronic medical record (EMR) under the Profile tab revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included acute heart failure. On 07/12/21, the resident was placed on a psychiatric hold and sent to a psychiatric…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-04 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive patient centered care plan related to an Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator (ICD) device one of 27 sample residents (Resident (R) 82) reviewed for care plans. The failure to update care plans to reflect the residents' needs can result in potential harm. Findings include: Review of the undated John Hopkins Medicine, titled article Living with a ICD located at https://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/health/wellness-and-prevention/living-with-a-pacemaker-or-implantable-cardioverter-defibrillator-icd revealed that there are post implant precautions that a patient has too abide by usually for life. Those precautions may include setting off some alarms in close proximity, not having a certain type of magnetic scans done, not using heat therapy, staying away from high voltage machines, careful use of cell phones and other electronic devices, just to name a few. Review of R82's undated Face Sheet located under the Profile tab of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-04 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to maintain current abilities for one of one resident (Resident (R) 80) reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL) of 27 sample residents. Failure of the facility to provide proper assistance for a resident that has ADL decline could result in psychological and physical harm. The facility census was 116. Findings include: Review of R80's undated Face Sheet located under the Profile tab of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Parkinson's disease without dyskinesia, lymphedema, dementia moderate, with other behavioral disturbance, glaucoma, blindness, right eye, and major depressive disorder. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) located under the MDS tab of the EMR, with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of nine out of 15 which indicated the resident was moderately cognitively…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to safely store an oxygen emergency tank (e-tank) for one of three (Residents (R) 272) reviewed for respiratory care of 27 sample residents. This failure placed the residents at risk of injury. The facility census was 116. Findings include: Review of the admission Record located in the Profile tab of the electronic medical record (EMR), revealed R272 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of emphysema (a lung condition that causes shortness of breath). Review of a Physician Order, dated 09/21/24 and located in the Orders tab of the EMR, revealed O2 [oxygen] at 2L [liters] as needed to keep oxygen saturation greater than 90%. During an observation on 10/02/24 at 2:59 PM, R272 was observed asleep in his wheelchair. He was connected to the oxygen concentrator via nasal cannula tubing. The e-tank was observed standing against the wall unsupported with the oxygen carrier nearby. During an interview on 10/02/24 at 3:01 PM, Minimum…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-04 · tag F0694 — isolated
    Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure an occlusive, peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) line was changed every seven days, as required for one of one resident (Resident (R) 108) reviewed for intravenous (IV) antibiotic use of 27 sample residents. This failure placed the residents at risk of increased infection and complications. The facility census was 116. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Central Vascular Access Device (CVAD) Dressing Change,: dated January 2004, revealed .The catheter insertion site is a potential entry site for bacteria that may cause a catheter-related infection .Perform sterile dressing changes .upon admission .If transparent dressing is dated, clean, dry, and intact, the admission dressing change may be omitted and scheduled for 7 days from the date on the dressing label . Review of the admission Record located in the Profile tab of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed R108 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-04 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of 27 sample residents (Resident (R) 4) medications were ordered and received for timely administration. This put residents at risk of complications from not receiving their medications. The facility census was 116. Findings include: Review of R4's Census tab of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of R4's Medical Diagnosis tab of the EMR revealed she had diagnoses that included rheumatoid arthritis, chronic pain syndrome, and anxiety. Review of R4's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 08/15/24 and located in the MDS tab of the EMR revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 10 out of 15 which indicated the resident was moderately cognitively impaired. R4 received scheduled pain medication and had not received any as needed medication or non-pharmaceutical pain interventions. She had pain Almost Constantly, it rarely affected her…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-04 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to document the death of a resident and include a physician order to release the body for one of one resident (Resident (R) 115) reviewed for death of 27 sample residents. This failure had the potential for residents to have a medical record that did not reflect care provided by the facility. The facility census was 116. Findings include: Review of a facility's policy titled, Charting and Documentation, dated 01/17, revealed .Chart all pertinent changes in the resident's condition, reaction to treatments, medications, etc., as well as routine observations .Be concise, accurate, and complete and use objective terms. Document only the facts .Death of a Resident .Pertinent information before death. (i.e., symptoms, vital signs, treatment, etc.) .Date and time of death .Name of physician notified and when notified .Name of funeral home, time notified and by whom .When and to whom the resident is released .Disposition of medications…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-21 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one staff maintained one sampled residents right to personal privacy for one resident (Resident #1) when Certified Nurse's Aide (CNA) A used his/her personal cell phone to record a two separate videos without the residents consent. One video showed Resident #1 lying in bed and and second video showed the resident with his/her glasses on upside down on his her face. The facility census was 119. The facility did not provide the requested policy regarding Resident Rights. The facilty did not provide the requested policy in regards to video recording of residents. Review of the Missouri Resident [NAME] of Rights, provided through the state long term are ombudsman (a person who represents the interests of residents) program included Residents have the right to privacy, to be treated with consideration, respect, and dignity, recognizing each resident ' s individuality. Review of the facilty's undated employee hand book showed in part: -Employees should: o Follow the facility's policies and work rules; o The possession or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-02-13 · tag F0557 — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff provided care in a manner to preserve and enhance residents dignity when staff utilized cell phones while provided resident cares to two of eight residents (Resident #3 and #4 ), and when staff did not provide adequate supplies for residents incontinent care needs (residents #3 and #4). This affected four of eight sampled residents. The facility census was 117. Facility did not provide policy on call lights or dignity. Review of facility policy, use of cell phones and other portable communication devices, undated, showed: -The use of cellular phones, pagers, or other portable communication devices is strictly prohibited while on duty except during scheduled rest and meal periods. -Use of these devices will be restricted to the break room or outside of the community; -While on duty these devices will be stored in locker, purse/backpack, or vehicle; 1. Review of Resident #2's quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], showed: -BIMS of 14,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-13 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, the facility failed to provide care and treatment in accordance with professional standards of practice when oxygen tubing was not changed and dated according to physician's orders weekly (Residents #3, #5, and #7) and when daily weights were not taken on one resident (resident #5 ). This affected three of eight sampled residents. The facility census was 117. Review of oxygen administration policy, dated October 2010, showed: -Verify that there is a physician's order for the procedure of oxygen administration. -Check the tubing connected to the oxygen cylinder or concentratior to assure that it is free of kinks. -Replenish water in humidifying jar as needed; -After completing the oxygen setup or adjustment, the following information should be recorded in the resident's medical record: -The date and time that the procedure was performed. -Rate of oxygen flow, route. -The frequency and duration of the treatment. -Reason for PRN administration. -If resident refused the procedure, the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-08-18 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure they cared for residents in a dignified manner when staff failed to respond to call lights in a timely manner for residents with incontinence for five of the 21 sampled residents (Residents #85, #306, #4, #37, #42). The facility also failed to ensure staff cared for residents in a dignified manner when staff left one resident (Resident # 85) sitting in a wheelchair in only a t-shirt and an incontinent brief with his/her genitalia exposed outside of the brief, in an open hallway in view of other people and failed to change one resident's (Resident #22) bed sheet that had two brown golf ball sized stains on it that were visible from the the hall. Additionally, the facility failed to put necessary precautions in place when one resident (Resident #99) wandered into another resident of the opposite sex room (Resident #67) while that resident was using the restroom. The facility census was 104. The facility did not provide any policies…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-18 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 4. Review of Resident #18's follow up question and report for snacks at bedtime for June, 2023 , showed the resident did not get offered a snack at bedtime on the following dates: - 6/3/23; 6/5/23; 6/6/23; 6/7/23; 6/8/23; 6/9/23; 6/10/23; 6/11/23; 6/12/23; 6/13/23; 6/14/23; 6/16/23; 6/17/23; 6/18/23; 6/20/23; 6/23/23; and 6/28/23. Review of the resident's follow up question and report for snacks at bedtime for July, 2023 , showed the resident did not get offered a snack at bedtime on the following dates: - 7/1/23; 7/2/23; 7/4/23; 7/7/23; 7/8/23; 7/12/23; 7/13/23; 7/19/23; 7/21/23; 7/22/23; 7/23/23; 7/25/23; 7/26/23; and 7/27/23. Review of Resident #18's quarterly MDS, dated [DATE] showed: - Cognitive skills severely impaired; - Independent with set up only for bed mobility, transfers, and toilet use; - Independent with eating; - Lower extremity impaired on one side; - Diagnoses included diabetes mellitus, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD, obstruction of air flow that interferes with normal breathing),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-08-18 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to maintain a safe, clean and comfortable homelike environment. This affected four Residents (Residents #37, #42, #43 and #73). The facility census was 104. The facility did not provide the requested policy regarding the environment. 1. Review of Resident #37's quarterly MDS, (MDS) A federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 8/15/23, showed: -Resident has moderate cognitive impairment; -Resident is independent with ADL's; (Activities of Daily Living) -Resident requires supervision for transfers; -Diagnoses included, kidney failure, diabetes mellitus and high blood pressure. A review of the resident's care plan, dated 5/25/23, showed: -Resident has an ADL self-care performance related to impaired balance; -Resident has limited physical mobility. Observation on 8/15/23, at 2:55 P.M., showed: -The resident's floor with dirt and debris; -The resident's floor had a sticky yellow substance on the floor by the bedside table.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-18 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff failed to follow physician orders for three out of 21 sampled residents when they failed to follow the physician's order for oxygen therapy for one resident (Resident #89) failed to transcribe a diagnosis of dementia for one resident (Resident #99) and failed to obtain an order to obtain Resident #9's blood glucose prior to obtaining the blood glucose. The facility census was 104. The facility did not provide a policy regarding following physicians orders. Review of the facility's Oxygen Administration policy, dated 1/2017 showed: - Verify there is a physician's order for this procedure for oxygen administration; - After completing the oxygen set up or adjustment, the following information should be recorded in the resident's medical record: - Date and time the procedure was performed; - Rate of oxygen flow; 1. Review of Resident #89's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-18 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure dependent residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living (ADLs) received the necessary services to maintain good personal hygiene when staff did not provide complete perineal care which affected three of 21 sampled residents, (Resident #43, #64, and #91), failed to ensure showers were completed for Resident #43, #59 #22 and #37 and failed to ensure shaving was completed for residents, (Resident #89 #254, #22. #37 and #27). The facility census was 104. The facility did not provide a policy for peri care and did not provide a policy for showers or shaving residents. 1. Review of Resident #43's significant change in status Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 8/6/23 showed: - Cognitive skills intact; - Limited assistance of one staff for bed mobility; - Extensive assistance of two staff for transfers and toilet use; - Extensive assistance of one staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff used proper techniques to reduce the possibility of accidents or injuries when transferring three sampled residents (Resident #33, #91 and Resident #43) during the use of a mechanical lift transfer. The facility census was 104. Review of the manufacture's instructions for the Medline mechanical lift, dated 2016, showed: -Open the legs of the lift when lifting the patient; -Close the legs of the lift before moving patient ; -Open the legs of the lift for stability before lowering the patient. -When raising and lowering the resident, apply the brakes in both rear casters. 1. Review of Resident #33's significant change MDS (a federally mandated assessment tool completed by facility staff), dated 7/6/23, showed: -Severe cognitive impairment; -Extensive assistance of two staff with bed mobility, transfers, toileting and personal hygiene; -Incontinent of bowel and bladder; -Diagnoses included, dementia, arthritis and anxiety.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-08-18 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff provided proper respiratory care when staff failed to follow physician orders for oxygen therapy for one resident (Resident #89) and failed to ensure oxygen concentrators had filters in them for one resident (Resident #306) out of 21 sampled residents. The facility census was 104. Review of the facility's Oxygen Administration policy, dated 1/2017 showed: - Verify there is a physician's order for this procedure for oxygen administration; - After completing the oxygen set up or adjustment, the following information should be recorded in the resident's medical record: - Date and time the procedure was performed; - Rate of oxygen flow; - The reason for PRN (as needed) administration. 1. Review of Resident #89's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff on 8/3/23 showed: - Cognitively impaired; - No behaviors or rejection of care; - Extensive assist with dressing, toilet use and bathing and limited assistance with transfers and personal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-08-18 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff administered medications with a medication error rate of less than 5%. Facility staff made six medication errors out of 25 opportunities for error which resulted in a medication error rate of 24%, which affected six out of 21 sampled residents, (Resident #5, #9, #18, #20, #37 and #88). The facility census was 104. The facility did not provide a policy for administration of medications, administration of eye drops or administration of insulin. Review of the website, www.webmd.com for administration of artificial tears showed: - Tilt the head back, look up and pull down the lower eyelid to make a pouch; - Place the dropper directly over the eye and squeeze out one or two drops as needed; - Look down and gently close your eye for one or two minutes; - Place one finger at the corner of the eye near the nose and apply gentle pressure. This will prevent the medication from draining away from the eye. 1. The facility did not provide Resident #5's physician order sheet (POS) for August 2023. Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-08-18 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — pattern
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff provided a safe and effective medication administration system that was free of significant medication errors when staff failed to [NAME] insulin pens prior to administering insulin which affected three of 21 sampled residents, ( Resident #9, #18 and #20). The facility census was 104. The facility did not provide a policy for administration of insulin. Review of the manufacturer's guidelines for Novolog (fast acting) flexpen insulin, revised 8/22 showed, in part: - Should eat a meal within five to ten minutes after taking it; - Wipe the rubber end of the pen with an alcohol swab; - Remove the seal from the new pen needle and attach it to the end of the pen; - Turn the knob on the pen to a dose of two units; - Hold the pen with the needle straight up. Tap the side of the pen to get rid of any air bubbles; - Push the injection button until you see 0 in the dose window. You should see a drop or stream of liquid at the end of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-08-18 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to meet the nutritional choices of two resident's and failed to be prepared in advance to ensure there was enough food available for the designated menus and supplements. This effected two of 21 sampled residents (Resident #42 and #13). The facility census was 104. Review of the facility's undated policy on resident meal cards, showed: - Residents shall have a tray card on file indicating significant food preference, including any religious or cultural preferences, diet orders, food allergies, and any other nutritional needs. - Resident tray cards shall be utilized by dining services staff to identify and provide accurate meal service for the individual, while honoring their dining needs and preferences. 1. Review of Resident 13's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 8/13/23 showed: - Brief interview of mental status (BIMS) score of 12, which indicates…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-18 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received meals that were nutritive in value and palatable when residents were served cold food which affected three residents (Resident #67, #43 and #59) out of 21 sampled residents. This also had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 104. Review of the facility's undated policy for Monitoring Food Temperatures for Meal Service, showed: - Food temperatures will be monitored to ensure foods are served at palatable temperatures. Review of the facility's undated dietary aide job description form showed: - Serve meals that are palatable and appetizing in appearance; - Assist with serving meals as necessary and on a timely basis; - Set up meal trays, food carts, dining room, etc. as instructed; - Deliver food carts, trays, etc. to designated areas. 1. Review of Resident #67's admission Minimum Data Set (a federally mandated process for clinical assessment of all residents in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-08-18 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — pattern
    Ensure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure they provided meals to residents at regular times comparable to normal mealtimes and at the posted times which affected five of 21 sampled residents (Residents #154, #13, #75, #254, #89 ). The facility census was 104. Review of the facilities posted meal times showed: - Breakfast 8:00-9:30 A.M.; - Lunch 12:00-1:30 P.M.; - Dinner 5:00-6:30 P.M. Review of the facility's undated policy on meal time observation for food acceptance and food replacement showed: - Residents will be observed during meal times to monitor acceptance and intake of food and beverage items, and offered food replacements of similar nutritive value or other food selections the resident might enjoy; - The staff will ensure that residents consuming meals in locations outside of the dining room, such as day rooms, resident rooms or private dining rooms are monitored appropriately as needed. Review of the facility's undated meal ticket process, showed: - Tickets will…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-18 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain the kitchen in a sanitary manner when staff failed to ensure the blinds were free from dust build up and the oven was free from food particles and debris. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure food items were properly dated, labeled and expired food items were discarded. These have the potential to affect all residents residing within the facility. The facility census was 104. Review of the facility's undated Labeling and Dating Foods policy showed: - All foods stored will be properly labeled according to the following guidelines. - Food items that are unopened will be dated with the date the case was received into the facility; - Once a case of food is opened, the individual food items from the case are dated with the date the item was received into the facility; - Expiration dates on commercially prepared, dry storage food items will be followed; - Once opened, all ready to eat, potentially hazardous food will be re-dated.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-08-18 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — pattern
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program to prevent gnats from swarming the residents and landing on them. This affected the comfort of four sampled residents (Resident #22, #37, #42 and #43). The facility census was 104. The facility did not provide the requested policy for pest control. 1. Review of Resident #22's quarterly (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 8/15/23, showed: -Resident has moderate cognative impairment; -Resident is independent with ADLs; -Resident requires supervision for transfers; -Diagnoses included, kidney failure, diabetes mellitus and high blood pressure. A review of the resident's care plan, dated 5/25/23, showed: -Resident has an ADL self-care performance related to impaired balance; -Resident has limited physical mobility. Observation and interview on 8/15/23, at 12: 21 P.M., showed: -The resident said he/she had gnats in his/her room; -Multiple gnats were seen…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$48,152 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

  • $22,080 — penalty dated 2026-01-23
  • $26,072 — penalty dated 2024-06-17

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to TUTERA SENIOR LIVING & HEALTH CARE — 25 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 3 of 52.0+1.0 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.2-0.2 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 51.7+0.3 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 53.0+2.0 vs chain
The other 24 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.0★, per CMS)
1 of 5Bethany Rehab & HccDekalb, IL 1 of 5Carlinville Rehab & HccCarlinville, IL 1 of 5Coulterville Rehab & HccCoulterville, IL 1 of 5Crystal Pines Rehab & HccCrystal Lake, IL 1 of 5Fair Oaks Rehab & HealthcareSouth Beloit, IL 1 of 5Grand Meadows Senior Living & Health CareAsbury, IA 1 of 5Hillsboro Rehab & HccHillsboro, IL 1 of 5Mattoon Rehab & HccMattoon, IL 1 of 5Metropolis Rehab & HccMetropolis, IL 1 of 5Moweaqua Rehab & HccMoweaqua, IL 1 of 5St Paul's Senior CommunityBelleville, IL 1 of 5Windsor Estates Of St CharlesSaint Charles, MO 2 of 5The Village At MissionPrairie Village, KS 2 of 5Westview Of Derby Rehabilitation & Health Care CenDerby, KS 3 of 5Carnegie Village Rehabilitation & Health Care CentBelton, MO 3 of 5Dixon Rehab & HccDixon, IL 3 of 5Highland Rehabilitation & Health Care CenterKansas City, MO 3 of 5Lakeland Rehab & Healthcare CenterEffingham, IL 3 of 5Meridian Rehabilitation And Health Care CenterWichita, KS 3 of 5Monterey Park Rehabilitation & Health Care CenterIndependence, MO 3 of 5NorterreLiberty, MO 3 of 5Northland Rehabilitation & Health Care CenterKansas City, MO 3 of 5Stratford Commons Rehab & Health Care CenterOverland Park, KS 5 of 5Charlton Place Rehab And Healthcare CenterDeatsville, AL

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
TUTERA GROUP, INCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST5%since 10/13/2016
BROOKS, KILEYIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 06/01/2013
WALNUT CREEK MANAGEMENT COMPANY LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 10/13/2016
BLOOM, RANDALLIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 10/13/2016
TUTERA, JOSEPHIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 10/13/2016

CMS files one row per role, so the 6 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$13.4M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+0.9%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$2.1M
Related-party expense16% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 49%Medicare 9%Other / private 42%

This home reported $2.1M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 16% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$331per resident / day
operating cost
$10,061per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$334per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MO

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Missouri Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Missouri
$6,741/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$7,604/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,400/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 265863. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-01-23, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next