The Village At Mission
7105 Mission Road, Prairie Village, KS 66208 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 60 certified beds · (913) 262-1611 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- inspectors recorded 2 serious findings as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (35) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $14,901 in federal fines (most recent 2026-01-27)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its last standard health inspection was over 2 years ago — the star rating may not reflect current conditions
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 3 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 11.4% | 17.9% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 10.5% | 4.9% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 1.5% | 1.6% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 3.9% | 2.9% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 8.7% | 6.5% | 6.5% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 3.9% | 4.3% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 30.3% | 23.2% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 90.9% | 95.5% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 8.5% | 4.4% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 17.3% | 22.6% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 7.4% | 18.1% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 4.0% | 1.9% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 68.6% | 73.8% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 17.6% | 22.4% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 5.9% | 11.5% | 12.0% | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
54.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 79 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 46.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 32 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.39 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 67% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 10% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 54.5%CMS range 44.4–66.9 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.0%CMS range 7.1–14.4 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 46.9% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 37.5% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 40.6% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.1%CMS range 4.3–11.4 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.94 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 60 beds and averages 50.1 residents a day — about 84% occupied, or roughly 10 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.00 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.60 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.455 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.60 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.16 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.70 to 0.37 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 51% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
35 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 23 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2026-01-27 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — isolatedProvide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 53 residents. The sample included nine residents reviewed for Advanced Directives (a legal document that provides instructions for medical care when a person is unable to communicate their wishes). Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to provide cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) to Resident (R) 1, who elected a full code status. On [DATE] at 05:10 PM, R1's family member reported to the nurse R1 had died. Licensed Nurse (LN) G did not check R1's code status until prompted by a hospice nurse and LN I, approximately 45 minutes later, and then the LNs started resuscitative measures. The facility's failure to initiate CPR on a full-code resident placed R1 and all residents with full code status in immediate jeopardy.Findings included:- R1's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented R1 admitted [DATE], with diagnoses of atherosclerotic heart disease (also known as coronary artery disease, when coronary arteries become narrowed or blocked by…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2026-06-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide an environment free from accidents when staff failed to use a gait belt during a transfer for Resident (R) 1, which resulted in a fractured right femur (thigh bone). Additionally, the facility failed to place an appropriate wheelchair cushion for R2, and instead used a bed pillow which caused the resident to slide out of her wheelchair during a van transport, resulting in bilateral hematomas to her knees. Findings included:- R1's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of malignant (the tendency of a medical condition, especially tumors, to become progressively worse, most familiar as a characteristic of cancer) neoplasm (tumor) of the middle third of the esophagus, hypertension (elevated blood pressure), gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD-backflow of stomach contents to the esophagus), and rheumatoid arthritis (chronic inflammatory disease that affected joints and other organ systems). R1's Entry Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-29 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure R1 received toileting assistance for Resident (R) 1 in accordance to her plan of care when staff left to sit in a soiled brief for over hours and failed to offer toileting assistance. Findings included:- R1's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented R1 had diagnoses of depression (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest), malaise (vague uneasy feeling of body weakness, distress or discomfort), osteoarthritis (degenerative changes to one or many joints characterized by swelling and pain), dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion), anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty and irrational fear) disorder, cognitive communication deficit (an impairment in organization, sequencing, attention, memory, planning, problem-solving, and safety awareness), and muscle weakness. R1's Admission/Five Day Minimum Data Set…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-10-25 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 34 residents. Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure refrigerated food items were covered, labeled, and dated, and failed to ensure consistent temperature monitoring for walk-in refrigerator and walk-in freezer in the kitchen. This deficient practice had the risk to spread foodborne illness to the residents. Findings included: - On 10/23/23 at 07:19 AM a tour of the kitchen revealed the following: Uncovered fruit cocktail; eight opened, pre-thickened containers of juice which were undated; uncovered cake, and undated and uncovered dipping sauces in the cooler/refrigerator. Temperature logs for the walk-in refrigerator and walk-in freezer lacked evidence staff assessed and recorded temperatures from 10/17/23 through 10/22/23. On 10/25/23 at 12:29 PM Dietary BB stated the food items in the refrigerator should be labeled, dated, and covered. Dietary BB further stated the temperature for the walk-in refrigerator and freezer should have been measured and documented for each day. The undated facility provided…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY - R52's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnoses tab documented diagnoses of altered mental status, cognitive communication deficit, history transient ischemic attack (TIA- temporary episode of inadequate blood supply to the brain), seizure (violent involuntary series of contractions of a group of muscles), and cerebral infarction (stroke - sudden death of brain cells due to lack of oxygen caused by impaired blood flow to the brain by blockage or rupture of an artery to the brain). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) was in progress. R52's Care Area Assessment (CAA) had not been completed and was in progress. R52's Care Plan dated 10/16/23 documented staff would encourage R52 to participate in activities that promoted exercise, physical activity for strengthening and improved mobility. Observation on 10/23/23 at 09:30 AM an unidentified staff member pushed R52 down the hallway to her room with her bilateral lower extremities slightly raised off the floor. R52 had foot boot on her left foot. On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-25 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility reported a census of 34 residents. Based of observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure safe storage and handling of the resident's medications. This deficient practice placed the residents at risk for unnecessary medication and administration errors. Findings Included: - On 10/26/23 at 07:10AM a walkthrough of the facility was completed with the following observations: An unsecured treatment cart located across from the dining room was inspected. The top drawer contained Bactroban (topical ointment used to treat bacterial infections) and Nystatin (topical ointment used to treat fungal infections) cream for Resident (R)106; and Nystatin cream for R105. The drawer also contained Voltaren cream (topical cream used to treat inflammation) and betamethasone (medication used to treat inflammation) for R151. All medications contained the Keep out of reach from children warning due to the risk of poisoning. The cart was secured by an unidentified staff member after the inspection. On 10/25/23 at 03:30PM Licensed Nurse (LN) G stated the treatment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 34 residents. The sample included 14 residents. The facility identified three COVID-19 (highly contagious, potentially life-threatening respiratory virus) positive residents. Based on record review, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure infection control standards were followed related to isolation precautions signage, water management for Legionella disease (Legionella is a bacterium which can cause pneumonia in vulnerable populations), and laundry services. This deficient practice placed the residents at risk for infectious diseases. Findings Included: - On 10/23/23 at 08:30AM an inspection was completed on the facility's laundry service room. An inspection of the facility's water temperature logs for the washing machine revealed no temperature testing was conducted after March 2023. On 10/23/23 at 09:13AM a walkthrough of the facility revealed Residents (R)154 and R111 were in isolation for COVID-19. Isolation carts were placed outside the rooms, but no signs were posted indicating the required precautions to enter the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-25 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 34 residents. The sample include 14 with one reviewed for privacy. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure privacy for Resident (R)108 when staff audio recorded medical treatment without consent. This deficient practice placed R108 at risk for decreased psychosocial wellbeing and impaired rights. Findings Included- - The Medical Diagnosis section within R108's Electronic Medical Records (EMR) included diagnoses of multiple sclerosis (MS- progressive disease of the nerve fibers of the brain and spinal cord), hypoxia (inadequate supply of oxygen), acute respiratory failure, and acute kidney failure. R108's EMR indicated she admitted the facility on 10/12/23 and expired (passed away) on 10/21/23 at the facility. A Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment was not yet completed or due. R108's Care Plan initiated 10/16/23 indicated she was a full code (term used to indicate the desire to receive resuscitative measures in the event of cardiac arrest) and had altered respiratory status related to acute respiratory…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-25 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 34 residents. The sample included 14 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to develop a person-centered comprehensive care plan for Resident (R) 53 related to his limited range of motion (ROM- the full movement potential of a joint, usually its range of flexion and extension). This deficient practice placed R53 at risk of loss of ability to perform activities of daily living (ADLs) and development or worsening contractures (abnormal permanent fixation of a joint or muscle) due to uncommunicated care needs. Findings included: - R53's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnoses tab documented diagnoses of anoxic (lack of oxygen) brain damage, quadriplegia (inability to move the arms, legs, and trunk of the body below the level of an associated injury to the spinal cord), and dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented a Brief…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-25 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 34 residents. The sample included 14 residents with five residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs). Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to provide consistent bathing opportunities for Resident (R)104 and R53. This deficient practice placed the residents at risk for skin complications and impaired dignity. Findings Included: - The Medical Diagnosis section within R104's Electronic Medical Records (EMR) included diagnoses of acute kidney failure, morbid obesity (severely overweight), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), cerebral infarction (stroke - sudden death of brain cells due to lack of oxygen caused by impaired blood flow to the brain by blockage or rupture of an artery to the brain), and history of brain hemorrhages (bleeding of the brain). R104''s admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) completed 08/28/23 indicated a Brief Interview for Mental Status assessment was not completed due to severe cognitive impairment. The MDS…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-25 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 34 residents. The sample included 14 residents with one reviewed for quality of care. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to complete physician ordered daily weights for Residents (R)106 and R51. This deficient practice placed both residents at risk for complications related to edema (swelling resulting from an excessive accumulation of fluid in the body tissues). Findings Included: - The Medical Diagnosis section within R106's Electronic Medical Records (EMR) included diagnoses of congestive heart failure (CHF-a condition with low heart output and the body becomes congested with fluid), acute respiratory failure, morbid obesity (severely overweight), post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD- mental disorder characterized by an acute emotional response to a traumatic event or situation involving severe environmental stress), anxiety disorder (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty and irrational fear), and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-25 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 34 residents. The sample included 14 residents with two residents reviewed for limited range of motion (ROM- the full movement potential of a joint, usually its range of flexion and extension). Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to implement a ROM program to help maintain and prevent a decrease in ROM/mobility for Resident (R) 53. This deficient practice placed R53 at risk of loss of ability to perform activities of daily living (ADLs) and development of worsening contractures (abnormal permanent fixation of a joint or muscle). Findings included: - R53's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnoses tab documented diagnoses of anoxic (lack of oxygen) brain damage, quadriplegia (inability to move the arms, legs, and trunk of the body below the level of an associated injury to the spinal cord), and dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE]…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 23 citations
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-25 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 34 residents. The sample included 14 residents with two reviewed for nutrition. Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide consistent weekly weight monitoring as required by Resident (R)105's physician's orders. This deficient practice placed R105 at risk for complication related to weight loss and malnutrition (condition that develops when the body is deprived of vitamins, minerals and other nutrients). Findings Included: - The Medical Diagnosis section within R105's Electronic Medical Records (EMR) included diagnoses of COVID-19 (highly contagious respiratory virus), dysphagia (swallowing difficulty), and aphasia (condition with disordered or absent language function). R105's Significant Change Minimum Data Base (MDS) completed 09/20/23 noted a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment was not completed due to severe cognitive impairment. The MDS indicated he required total assistance from one staff for meals. The MDS noted he weighed 133 pounds (lbs.) and had weight loss. The MDS noted he was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-25 · tag F0699 — isolatedProvide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 34 residents. The sample included 14 residents with one reviewed for trauma informed care (treatment or care directed to prevent re-experiencing or reducing the effects of traumatic events). Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to identify trauma-based triggers related to Resident (R)106's childhood sexual abuse and failed to implement individualized interventions to prevent re-traumatization. These deficient practices placed R106 at risk for decreased psychosocial well-being and ineffective treatment. Findings Included: - The Medical Diagnosis section within R106's Electronic Medical Records (EMR) included diagnoses of congestive heart failure (CHF-a condition with low heart output and the body becomes congested with fluid), acute respiratory failure, morbid obesity (severely overweight), post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD- mental disorder characterized by an acute emotional response to a traumatic event or situation involving severe environmental stress), anxiety disorder (mental or emotional reaction…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-25 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility reported a census of 34 residents. The sample included 14 residents with six reviewed for pharmacy services. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, The facility failed to establish a system to enable accurate medication reconciliation and maintenance of Resident (R)106's controlled hypnotic medication (a class of medications used to induce sleep) records. This deficient practice placed the affected residents at risk for medication diversion and/or misappropriation. Findings Included: - The Medical Diagnosis section within R106's Electronic Medical Records (EMR) included diagnoses of congestive heart failure, acute respiratory failure, morbid obesity (severely overweight), post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD- mental disorder characterized by an acute emotional response to a traumatic event or situation involving severe environmental stress), anxiety disorder (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty and irrational fear), and insomnia (difficulty sleeping). R106's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) completed 07/25/23 noted a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-25 · tag F0779 — isolatedKeep signed and dated reports of x-rays and other diagnostic services in the residents record.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 34 residents. The sample included 14 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure physician ordered chest x-ray results for Resident (R) 53 were signed and scanned into the clinical record. This deficient practice could result in unnecessary tests and delayed treatment. Findings included: - R53's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) under the Medication Administration Record (revealed the following physician orders: Chest X-ray two views to rule out pneumonia (inflammation of the lungs) dated 07/21/23. Chest X-ray two views due to congestion and cough 09/15/23. R53's EMR, including the Misc. tab, lacked the chest x-ray results. The facility obtained and provided a copy of R53's unsigned x-ray results upon request. On 10/25/23 at 04:22 PM Administrative Nurse D stated she expected lab and x-ray results to reviewed and scanned into the residents EMR within 24 hours but no later than 72 hours. The facility was unable to provide a policy related to medical records. The facility failed to ensure physician…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-02-17 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 43 residents. The sample included 12 residents, with five reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs). Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide scheduled bathing for five sampled residents, Resident (R) 9, R17, R32, R23, and R5. This placed these residents at risk for skin problems and poor hygiene. Findings included: - R9's Physician's Order Sheet, dated 02/07/22, recorded diagnoses of dementia (persistent mental disorder marked by memory loss and impaired reasoning), muscle weakness, and seizure disorder (uncontrolled brain activity that cause abnormal movements such as twitching, rigidity, limpness) The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], recorded R9 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12 (cognitively intact) with no behaviors. The MDS recorded R9 required extensive to total staff assistance with transfers, dressing, personal hygiene, bathing, and was incontinent of bowel and urine. The Activities of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-02-17 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 43 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to serve palatable food during meals that maintained appetizing temperatures for the residents who resided in the facility and received food from the facility kitchen. This placed the residents at risk for nutritional status problems and weight loss. Findings included: - The 02/09/22 lunch menu recorded club sandwich, macaroni salad, fruit cobbler, and potato/vegetable soup. On 02/09/22 at 12:30 PM, observation during the noon meal revealed staff brought the insulated food cart to the North 100 hall. At 12:45 PM staff removed the last tray out of the food cart. Upon request, Registered Dietician (RD) GG obtained a thermometer and measured the temperatures of the last tray of food on the cart for Resident (R) 5 with the following results: Cheese Pizza slice 160.0 degrees Fahrenheit (F) (the resident chose an alternate) Potato/Vegetable soup 122.5 F Macaroni pasta salad 67.9 degrees F On 02/09/22 at 09:35 AM, R5 stated her food was usually cold and late. On 02/09/22 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-02-17 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 43 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to prepare, store, distribute, and serve food under sanitary conditions for the 43 residents in the facility, who received their meals from the facility kitchen. This placed the residents at risk for food borne illness. Findings included: - On 02/09/22 at 08:30 AM, during initial tour, observation revealed the following in the long-term care kitchenette: 1- eighteen by eighteen-inch square air vent located above the food steam table and food serving area with brownish gray fuzzy substance on the grill and on the ceiling tiles surrounding the air grill. The refrigerator revealed one 12-ounce container of macaroni and cheese with an expiration date of 12/24/21. The food temperature logs and refrigerator/freezer/dishwasher temperatures had not been documented since February 1. On 02/09/22 at 08:40 AM, Dietary Staff (DS) BB verified the refrigerator/freezer/dishwasher temperatures had not been documented since February 1, and stated the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-02-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 43 residents. The sample included 12 residents, with two reviewed for urinary catheters. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure urinary catheter tubing and collection bag did not contact the floor for Resident (R) 8 and R18, and appropriate disinfectant cleaning of the glucometer (device used to measure blood sugar) for R138 and R86. This placed R8 and R18 at risk for urinary tract infections (UTIs) and R138 and R86 at risk for blood borne infections. Findings included: - The Physician Order Sheet, dated 02/04/22, recorded R8 had diagnoses of dementia (persistent mental disorder marked by memory loss and impair reasoning), neurogenic bladder (dysfunction of the urinary bladder caused by a lesion of the nervous system), and a history of urinary tract infection (UTI). The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], recorded R8 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of seven (severe cognitive impairment) with no behaviors. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-02-17 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 43 residents. The sample included 12 residents, with two reviewed for urinary catheters. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to cover urinary catheter bags for two sampled residents, Resident (R) 8 and R18. This placed R8 and R18 at risk for impaired dignity and psychosocial wellbeing. Findings included: - The Physician Order Sheet, dated 02/04/22, recorded R8 had diagnoses of dementia (persistent mental disorder marked by memory loss and impair reasoning), neurogenic bladder (dysfunction of the urinary bladder caused by a lesion of the nervous system), and a history of urinary tract infection (UTI). The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], recorded R8 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of seven (severe cognitive impairment) with no behaviors. The MDS recorded R8 required extensive staff assistance with transfers, had a urinary catheter, and used a wheelchair for mobility. The Urinary Catheter Care Plan, dated 02/09/22,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-02-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 43 residents. The sample included 12 residents with three reviewed for accident hazards. Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for two of three sampled residents, Residents (R) 8 and 32. This placed R8 and R32 at risk for skin injuries and falls. Findings included: - The Physician Order Sheet, dated 01/28/22, recorded R8 had diagnoses of dementia (persistent mental disorder marked by memory loss and impair reasoning), anxiety (mental health disorder characterized by worry and fear that interferes with daily life), and muscle weakness. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], recorded R8 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of seven (severely impaired cognition). The MDS recorded R8 required extensive staff assistance with transfers, impaired balance that required staff assistance to stabilize, history of falls, and used a wheelchair for mobility. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-02-17 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 43 residents. The sample included 12 residents with one reviewed for dialysis. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide ongoing communication and assessment of the resident's dialysis (the process of removing waste products and excess fluid from the body when the kidneys are not able to adequately filter the blood) treatment, including monitoring for Resident (R) 135. This placed the resident at risk for complications and health decline. Findings included: - R135's Physician's Order Sheet, dated 01/26/22 documented the resident had diagnoses of end stage renal disease (decline in kidney function.) R135's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated 02/06/22, recorded R135 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10 which indicated moderately impaired cognition. The MDS recorded he required extensive assistance of one staff for bed mobility, dressing, toileting, and personal hygiene. The MDS further recorded R135 was occasionally incontinent of urine and did not record the resident received dialysis…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-02-17 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 43 residents. The sample included 12 residents, of which five were reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure one of five sampled residents, Resident (R) 12, received as needed (PRN) Xanax (an antianxiety medication that calm and relax people with excessive restlessness, nervousness and tension) with a 14 day stop date and rationale for use. This placed R12 at risk to receive unnecessary psychotropic medications (medications that affect the chemical make-up of the brain). Findings included: - R12's Physician's Order Sheet, dated 02/04/22, recorded diagnoses of bipolar disorder (major mental illness that caused people to have episodes of severe high and low moods) and anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty and irrational fear). The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], recorded R12 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13 which indicated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-02-17 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 43 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure insulin (hormone that lowers the level of glucose in the blood.) pens were dated when opened for Resident (R) 2, R28, and R138. This placed the affected residents at risk for decreased medication effectiveness. Findings included: - On 02/09/22 at 08:23 AM, observation revealed insulin pens not dated when opened for the following residents: R2 - Lantus insulin pen R28 - Lantus insulin pen and Humalog insulin pen R138 - Novolog insulin pen On 02/09/22 at 08:23 AM, Licensed Nurse (LN) G stated staff marked the insulin pen with a marker that easily rubbed off and verified the insulin pens did not have a readable open date. On 02/17/22 at 10:10 AM, Administrative Nurse D stated staff should ensure insulin pens were dated when opened to maintain the effectiveness of the medication. The Medication Storage Policy, dated May 2019, directed staff to store medications per manufacturer guidelines to maintain the medication therapeutic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2020-07-30 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 12 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on interviews and record review the facility failed to provide change of condition notification to one Resident's (R83) representative when he transferred to the hospital. Findings included: - R83's electronic medical record (EMR) documented diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease (progressive mental deterioration characterized by confusion and memory failure), atrial fibrillation (rapid, irregular heart beat), and acute kidney failure (inability of the kidneys to excrete wastes, concentrate urine and conserve electrolytes). The Five Day Minimum Data Set dated 06/12/20 documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 2, which indicated severely impaired cognition. The baseline Care Plan dated 06/10/20 documented R83 had short and long- term memory deficits. He required extensive staff assistance for his Activities of Daily Living and uses a wheelchair for locomotion. He was at risk for falls due to multiple medications, gait problems, impaired balance, age, and dementia (progressive mental…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2020-07-30 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 12 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, interviews, and record review the facility failed to update the care plan to reflect change in code status for Resident (R) 32. Findings included: - The Diagnoses tab of R32's electronic medical record (EMR) documented diagnoses of multiple sclerosis (progressive disease of the nerve fibers of the brain and spinal cord ), quadriplegia (paralysis of the arms, legs and trunk of the body below the level of an associated injury to the spinal cord), and pressure ulcer of right buttock. The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed R32 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10 which indicated moderate cognitive impairment. R32 required total dependence with two staff assistance for bed mobility, toileting, and transfers. R32 required total dependence with one staff for locomotion, dressing, eating, and personal hygiene. The Quarterly MDS dated 05/25/2020 revealed R32 had a BIMS score of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2020-07-30 · tag F0661 — isolatedEnsure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 12 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on interviews and record review the facility failed to document a recapitulation of the facility stay upon discharge from the facility for Resident (R) 35 sampled for discharge. Findings included: - The Diagnoses tab of R35's electronic medical record (EMR) documented diagnoses of malignant neoplasm of the frontal and occipital lobes (brain cancer), hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body), and muscle weakness. R35's admission Minimum Data Set dated 12/10/19 documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12, which indicated moderately impaired cognition. He required limited to extensive staff assistance with his Activities of Daily Living (ADLs). The ADL Functional/Rehabilitation Potential Care Area Assessment dated 12/10/19 documented R35 required staff assistance for his ADLs due to his diagnoses. The Care Plan dated 12/12/19 documented R35's goal was to be discharged to home but, due to continuing decline in his condition he required a setting which was able to meet and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-07-30 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 12 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on record reviews, observations, and interviews the facility failed to ensure Resident (R)19 received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice when the facility failed to follow a physician's order which directed staff to apply compression stocking (specially made socks which help prevent leg swelling and possible blood clots) to R19's lower extremities. Findings included: - The Diagnoses tab of R19's electronic medical record (EMR) documented diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary failure (COPD- progressive and irreversible condition characterized by diminished lung capacity and difficulty or discomfort in breathing), muscle weakness, hemiplegia of his left side (paralysis of one side of the body), and acute/chronic renal failure (inability of the kidneys to excrete wastes, concentrate urine and conserve electrolytes). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented a Brief…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2020-07-30 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 12 residents. The sample included 12 residents with one resident reviewed for pressure ulcers (localized injury to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence, as a result of pressure, or pressure in combination with shear and/or friction). Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to follow wound care orders for Resident (R) 32 as ordered by the wound care center provider for a stage four (wound that extends below the subcutaneous [beneath the skin] fat into deep tissues like muscles, tendons, and ligaments) pressure ulcer on the resident's right buttocks/ischium (part of the hip bone). Findings included: - The Diagnoses tab of R32's electronic medical record (EMR) documented diagnoses of multiple sclerosis (progressive disease of the nerve fibers of the brain and spinal cord), quadriplegia (paralysis of the arms, legs and trunk of the body below the level of an associated injury to the spinal cord), and pressure ulcer of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-07-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 12 residents. The sample included 12 residents with three residents sampled for accidents. Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to ensure staff implemented interventions to prevent injury from falls when staff failed to provide a floor mat as indicated in R2's plan of care. This deficient practice placed R2 at risk for injury due to falls and/or accidents. Findings included: - R2's electronic medical record (EMR) documented diagnoses of muscle weakness, difficulty walking, cognitive communication deficit, anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty, and irrational fear) and Alzheimer's disease (progressive mental deterioration characterized by confusion and memory failure). The 09/18/19 admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 99, which indicated severely impaired cognition. She required extensive staff assistance with her Activities of Daily Living (ADLs). She was incontinent of bowel and bladder. She had no falls since…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2020-07-30 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 12. The sample included 12 residents with one resident reviewed for feeding tube (tube for introducing high calorie fluids into the stomach). The facility failed to provide appropriate care and services to prevent complications of enteral feedings when staff failed to date and time the feeding tube administration tubing and feeding formula bag for Resident (R) 32. Findings included: - The Diagnoses tab of the electronic medical record (EMR) documented diagnoses of multiple sclerosis (progressive disease of the nerve fibers of the brain and spinal cord ), protein-calorie malnutrition (nutritional status in which reduced availability of nutrients leads to changes in body composition and function), adult gastrostomy status (surgical creation of an artificial opening into the stomach thru the abdominal wall), and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed R32 did not have a feeding tube at the time of the assessment. The Quarterly…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2020-07-30 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 12 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to assess Resident (R) 32's pain before, during, and after wound dressing change. Findings included: - The Diagnoses tab of R32's electronic medical record (EMR) documented diagnoses of multiple sclerosis (progressive disease of the nerve fibers of the brain and spinal cord ), quadriplegia (paralysis of the arms, legs and trunk of the body below the level of an associated injury to the spinal cord), and pressure ulcer (localized injury to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence, as a result of pressure, or pressure in combination with shear and/or friction ) of right buttock/ischium (part of the hip bone) stage four. The 'Annual Minimum Data Set' (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed R32 complained of pain rarely during the assessment period and did receive PRN (as needed) pain medication. The Quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE]…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2020-07-30 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 12 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Five residents were sampled for unnecessary medication review. Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews the facility failed to ensure the Consultant Pharmacist (CP) identified and reported a blood pressure medication was given outside of the Primary Care Provider's (PCP) ordered parameters for Resident (R) 14. Findings included: - The Diagnoses tab of R14's electronic medical record (EMR) documented diagnoses of atrial fibrillation (rapid irregular heartbeat) and congestive heart failure (CHF-a condition with low heart output and the body becomes congested with fluid). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, which indicated intact cognition. She required extensive to total staff assistance with her Activities of Daily Living (ADLs). The Quarterly MDS dated 05/13/20 documented a BIMS score of seven, which indicated severely impaired…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2020-07-30 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 12 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Five residents were sampled for unnecessary medication review. Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews the facility failed to hold antihypertensive (medication used to treat high blood pressure) medication for Resident (R) 14, when her blood pressures were outside standing order parameters. Findings included: - The Diagnoses tab of R14's electronic medical record (EMR) documented diagnoses of atrial fibrillation (rapid irregular heartbeat) and congestive heart failure (CHF-a condition with low heart output and the body becomes congested with fluid). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, which indicated intact cognition. She required extensive to total staff assistance with her Activities of Daily Living (ADLs). The Quarterly MDS dated 05/13/20 documented a BIMS score of seven, which indicated severely impaired cognition. She required…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$14,901 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $14,901 — penalty dated 2026-01-27
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to TUTERA SENIOR LIVING & HEALTH CARE — 25 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 2.0 | ≈ chain avg |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.2 | -0.2 vs chain |
| Staffing | 3 of 5 | 1.7 | +1.3 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 3.0 | +1.0 vs chain |
The other 24 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.0★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| THE VILLAGE AT MISSION PROPERTY LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 40% | since 06/01/2021 |
| TUTERA, JOSEPH | Individual | 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST; CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 06/01/2021 |
| BROOKS, KILEY | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 06/01/2021 |
| GANNON, JEFF | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 06/01/2021 |
| WALNUT CREEK MANAGEMENT COMPANY LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 06/01/2021 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 8 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $1.4M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 13% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in KS
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Kansas Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 175499. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2023-10-25, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.