Lakeland Rehab & Healthcare Center
800 West Temple Street, Effingham, IL 62401 · For profit - Corporation · 154 certified beds · (217) 342-2171 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602) — most recent Feb 2025
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 3 actual-harm citations
- inspectors recorded 2 serious findings as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (28) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $86,553 in federal fines (most recent 2026-06-03)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
- about 21% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 3 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 3 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 2 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 19.0% | 13.4% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 2.2% | 6.3% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.9% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.6% | 1.5% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 16.0% | 54.2% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 4.3% | 3.1% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 19.8% | 14.3% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 17.4% | 18.3% | 18.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 98.1% | 91.8% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 3.0% | 4.8% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 35.0% | 20.6% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 15.8% | 21.7% | 17.1% | typical |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.3% | 2.2% | 1.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 64.5% | 63.1% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 31.6% | 26.1% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 26.4% | 13.9% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.44 | 2.02 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 3.58 | 2.22 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
49.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 311 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 56.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 137 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.26 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 37% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 6% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 49.1%CMS range 43.1–54.5 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 12.0%CMS range 9.3–14.4 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 56.9% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 36.5% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 61.3% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 68.3% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.5% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 8.6%CMS range 5.9–12.7 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.13 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 154 beds and averages 118.4 residents a day — about 77% occupied, or roughly 36 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.39 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.46 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.02 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.99 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.56 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.50 to 0.34 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 39% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
28 citations, most serious first. The 15 most serious are shown; the remaining 13 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · G2026-06-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to safely transport 1 of 3 (R1) residents reviewed for accidents in a sample of 4. This failure resulted in R1's left foot getting caught in her wheelchair wheel during transport and resulted in R1 sustaining an acute mildly displaced fracture of the distal fibula and medial malleolus of the left leg.This past non-compliance occurred from 5/16/2026 to 5/18/2026.R1's admission Record documented an admission date of 4/4/2025 with diagnoses of type two diabetes mellitus, complete atrioventricular block, chronic kidney disease, non-st elevation myocardial infarction and weakness among others. R1's MDS (minimum data set) dated 3/23/26, documents R1 with a BIMS (brief interview for mental status) score of 10 out of 15 total which indicates R1 has moderate cognitive impairment. This same MDS documents R1 has impairment to both upper and low extremities, uses a wheelchair for locomotion and is dependent on staff for most activities of daily living, including…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-02-18 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent peer to peer sexual abuse for 1 of 4 residents (R1) reviewed for abuse in the sample of 4. This failure resulted in R1, who is cognitively impaired and incapable of giving informed consent to inappropriate sexual touching and having unsolicited sexual comments directed toward her. These actions would cause a reasonable person to experience feelings of guilt, embarrassment, anger, and shame. Findings include: R1's Face Sheet documented an admission Date of 6/29/23 and listed diagnoses including Osteoarthritis and Alzheimer's Disease. R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 3, indicating R1 has severe impaired cognition. R2's Face Sheet documented an admission Date of 9/17/24 and listed diagnoses including Diabetes Type 2 and End Stage Renal Disease Dependent on Dialysis. R2's MDS dated [DATE] documented a BIMS score of 14, indicating R2 is cognitively intact. R2's Nursing Progress…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-06-11 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to remove surgical staples and to obtain an x-ray as ordered for 1 of 11 residents (R1) reviewed for quality of care in the sample of eleven. This failure resulted in R1's surgical hip incision becoming infected and requiring antibiotic therapy. Findings include: R1's Face Sheet documented an admission Date of 12/27/23 and listed diagnoses including Congestive Heart Failure, Anxiety Disorder, and Chronic Kidney Disease. R1's 1/5/24 Minimum Data Set (MDS) documented that R1 had severe deficits in cognitive function. R1's Nursing Progress Notes documented the following: On 1/29/24 at 8:10am: Continues to complain of severe pain right hip/right leg. Had hydrocodone and ativan around 3:20am, then Tylenol at 7:12am. No relief. Moaning. Will not sit up in wheelchair straight. Total assist with toileting and transfer this morning, unable to stand on right leg. No internal/external rotation of extremities noted. Complains of pain when right leg or hip touched or when right leg is moved. Called (V14, Physician) office and notified of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-05-24 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure timely assistance was provided for toileting needs for 1 (R56) of 6 reviewed for Activities of Daily Living in the sample of 51. This failure resulted in R56 expressing undue feelings of frustration, embarrassment, and neck pain. Findings Include: R56's admission Record documented an original admission date to the facility as 7/1/22. R56 is documented as being a [AGE] year old female with diagnoses including but not limited to: Secondary Parkinsonism, Unspecified; End Stage Renal Disease; Nontraumatic Subarachnoid Hemorrhage, Unspecified, etc. R56's Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date of 2/27/24 documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status Score of 13, indicating she's cognitively intact. The same MDS documented in Section GG0130, Dependent care for toileting hygiene. Section GG0170 also documented a dependent status for toileting transfer. Section H0300 documented R56 as being frequently incontinent. R56's Plan of Care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-05-14 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents are free from abuse for two of three residents (R2 and R6) reviewed for abuse in the sample of 3. This failure resulted in R6 experiencing having clothing placed over his mouth twice in an attempt to quiet him. A reasonable person would also experience feelings of humiliation, intimidation, fear, emotional distress, and helplessness as a result. This past non-compliance occurred between 4/13/24 and 4/16/24. Findings include: 1.R6's face Sheet documented an admission date of 2/24/22, and diagnoses including Autistic Disorder, Dysphagia, Repeated Falls, and Unspecified Intellectual Disabilities. R6's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated for 3/12/2024, documents that R6 has a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 3, indicating that R6 has severe cognitive impairment. The same MDS documents that R6 is totally dependent on at least two persons assist for upper and lower body dressing. On 5/10/2024 at 1:40pm, attempted interview with R6 but due to severe cognitive impairment, R6 was unable to answer…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-13 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the family of a change in condition for 1 (R1) of 3 residents reviewed for notification of changes in the sample of 4. The Findings Include:R1's admission Record documented an admission date of 09/17/2024 and included diagnoses of acute osteomyelitis of right ankle and foot, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, type 2 diabetes mellitus, generalized anxiety, end stage renal disease, chronic diastolic heart failure, anemia in chronic kidney disease, and dependance on renal dialysis.R1's Care Plan documented a focus area of R1 needs dialysis related to renal failure. Corresponding intervention included, do not draw blood or take blood pressure in the right arm with graft, encourage resident to go for the scheduled dialysis appointments on Monday, Wednesday, and Friday, and monitor labs and report to the doctor as needed.R1's Progress Note dated 03/27/2026 with a time of 4:58 A.M. authored by V8 (Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN) documented R1 refused to get up for dialysis treatment this morning. R1's Progress Note dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-02 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents were turned and repositioned to prevent skin breakdown for 1 of 3 (R4) residents reviewed for quality of care in the sample of 14. Findings Include: R4's admission Record with a print date of 04/02/26 documents R4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include heart disease, diabetes, kidney disease, hypertension, osteoarthritis, and dementia. R4's Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] documents a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 10, indicating a moderate cognitive deficit. Section H, Bladder and Bowel, documents that R4 is always incontinent of urine and bowel. Section M, Skin Conditions, documents that R4 has Moisture Associated Skin Damage (MASD) with skin and ulcer/injury treatments of a pressure reducing device for chair and bed, applications of nonsurgical dressings, and application of ointments/medications.R4's current Care Plan documents a Focus area of, (R4) has an ADL (activities of daily…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-02 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure physician orders were followed and referrals to specialist were obtained for treatment of a Urinary Tract Infection (UTI) for 1 of 3 (R1) residents reviewed for urinary infections in the sample of 14.Findings Include:R1's admission Record with a print date of 4/2/26 documents R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include diabetes, Chronic Kidney Disease (Stage 5), hypertension, morbid obesity, muscle weakness, hydrocele, and compression fracture of vertebrae. R1's Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] documents a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 01, indicating a severe cognitive deficit. Section H, Bladder and Bowel, documents that R1 has occasional urinary incontinence. R1's Care Plan documents a Focus area of, The resident has bladder incontinence R/T (related to) confusion. Date Initiated: 09/27/2024. This Focus area includes the intervention of, Monitor/document for s/sx (signs/symptoms) UTI (urinary tract…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-05 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolatedEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to prepare potatoes according to the recipe for 3 of 4 (R2, R15, R24) residents reviewed for meal service in the sample of 26.Findings include: 1.R2's admission Record with a print date of 3/5/2026 documents R2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and included diagnoses of cerebrovascular disease, aphasia, cerebral infarction, dysphagia, and hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebra infarction affecting right dominant side.R2's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12, which indicates R2 has a moderate cognitive deficit.R2's current Care plan documents a Focus area of (R2) has a swallowing problem Coughing or choking during meals or swallowing med (medications). Dated 03/06/2025. This Focus area includes the interventions of, All staff to be informed of resident's special dietary and safety needs. Date Initiated: 03/06/2025. Instruct the resident to eat in an upright position, to eat…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-28 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — patternEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure menus were followed for 4 of 6 (R57, R24, R13, and R119) residents reviewed for nutrition in the sample of 56. Findings include:1. R57's admission Record with a print date of 7/24/25 documents R57 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include Alzheimer's Disease, morbid obesity, dementia, and gastroesophageal reflux disease.R57's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 5/31/25 documents a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 03, indicating a severe cognitive deficit.R57's current undated Care Plan documents a Focus area of (R57) has nutritional problem or potential nutritional problem, altered diet. Regular diet, pureed texture, nectar thick liquids. This same Focus area includes an intervention to Provide, serve diet as ordered. Monitor intake and record q (every) meal.R57's Medication Review Report dated 7/24/25 documents a physician order for regular diet, pureed texture, nectar thick liquids with a start…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-28 · tag F0694 — isolatedProvide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to administer intravenous medications according to professional standards of practice to 2 of 2 residents (R117 and R118) reviewed for intravenous medications in the sample of 56. Findings include:1. R117's admission Record documents an initial admission date of 10/23/2023 and diagnoses including in part sepsis, infection, and inflammatory reaction due to indwelling urethral catheter, stage 3 pressure ulcer of right heel and left heel, and osteomyelitis of ankle and foot.R117's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13 indicating R117 has intact cognition.R117's Order Summary Report dated 7/24/2025 documents and order to flush Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC) with 10 milliliters (ml) of normal saline followed by 5 ml Heparin post medication administration every day shift with a start date of 7/21/25, R117 required enhanced barrier precautions related to wounds, urinary…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-28 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure proper infection prevention and control practices were used during resident care for 2 of 5 residents (R117 and R118) observed for infection prevention and control in the sample of 56.Findings include:1. R117's admission Record documents an initial admission date of 10/23/2023 and diagnoses including in part sepsis, infection, and inflammatory reaction due to indwelling urethral catheter, stage 3 pressure ulcer of right heel and left heel, and osteomyelitis of ankle and foot.R117's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13 indicating R117 has intact cognition.R117's Order Summary Report dated 7/24/2025 documents and order to flush Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC) with 10 milliliters (ml) of normal saline followed by 5 ml Heparin post medication administration every day shift with a start date of 7/21/25, R117 required enhanced barrier precautions related to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-18 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to report to the facility Administrator or his/her designated representative an incident of peer to peer sexual abuse for 1 of 4 residents (R1) reviewed for abuse in the sample of 4. Findings include: R1's Face Sheet documented an admission Date of 6/29/23 and listed diagnoses including Osteoarthritis and Alzheimer's Disease. R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 3, indicating R1 has severe impaired cognition. The same MDS documented that R1 is dependent on staff for transfers and wheelchair mobility. R1's Care Plan dated 1/31/25 documented a problem area, The resident has a behavior problem 1/28/25, (R1) involved in a resident to resident touching incident with corresponding interventions, Changed (R1's) room, added 1/28/25, and Every 15 minute checks for 24 hours, added 1/28/25. R2's Face Sheet documented an admission Date of 9/17/24 and listed diagnoses including Diabetes…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-18 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report, investigate, and further prevent peer to peer sexual abuse for 1 of 4 residents (R1) reviewed for abuse in the sample of 4. Findings include: R1's Face Sheet documented an admission Date of 6/29/23 and listed diagnoses including Osteoarthritis and Alzheimer's Disease. R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 3, indicating R1 has severe impaired cognition. The same MDS documented that R1 is dependent on staff for transfers and wheelchair mobility. R1's Care Plan dated 1/31/25 documented a problem area, The resident has a behavior problem 1/28/25, (R1) involved in a resident to resident touching incident with corresponding interventions, Changed (R1's) room, added 1/28/25, and Every 15 minute checks for 24 hours, added 1/28/25. R2's Face Sheet documented an admission Date of 9/17/24 and listed diagnoses including Diabetes Type 2 and End Stage Renal Disease Dependent on Dialysis. R2's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-10 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolatedProtect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents were safe from misappropriation of a controlled substance medication for 1 of 3 residents (R2) reviewed for misappropriation in a sample of 8. The findings include: R2's facility Initial Report dated 8/20/24 documents in part: The purpose of this letter is to notify The Department of a possible drug diversion. It was noted that resident Received his 8am dose of morphine but when the nurse went to give the 10 am dose the morphine could not be located. All notifications have been made. The facility has initiated an investigation into the matter. A final report will follow. R2's facility Final Report dated 8/26/24 documents in part: The purpose of this letter is to notify The Department of our conclusion of the investigation into a possible drug diversion. Licensed staff had administered the resident's 8 am dose. At 10 am when the Licensed Nurse went to administer the morphine, the bottle of morphine could not be located. The physician, POA (Power of Attorney), (City) Police and the Ombudsman were notified.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 13 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-10 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to prevent residents from receiving medical treatment without a doctor's order for 1 (R1) of 3 residents reviewed for physician's orders in a sample of 8. Findings include: R1's admission record documents an admission date of 02/20/24 with diagnoses in part; type II diabetes mellitus with hypoglycemia without coma, paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, other seizures, unspecified convulsions. R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents a BIMS (Brief interview for mental status) of 12, indicating that R1 is cognitively intact . R1's order summary sheet documents an order for ACCUCHECK every two hours from the ER (Emergency Room) for hypoglycemia with a start date of 3/4/24 and a discontinue date of 6/20/24. On 3/19/24 R1's Medication Administration Record documented accuchecks every two hours, most of R1's accuchecks were between 80 and 162, which is not considered to be hypoglycemic. There is an accucheck at 12pm of 46, which is considered hypoglycemia,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-10 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolatedProvide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide adequate supervision for residents with dementia for 2 (R3 and R4) of 5 residents reviewed for dementia care services in the sample of 8. Findings include: A facility incident report dated and timed 9/15/24 at 11:08am, documents the following incident description in part: A Housekeeper helping another patient to her room walking in room [ROOM NUMBER]. When opened room [ROOM NUMBER] housekeeper witnessed (R4) standing in front of female patient with his pants open and down-with suspenders holding pants part way up. Female resident was in her room on her bed, fully clothed. Female patient had her mouth open providing oral sex to (R4). (R4) turned around and pulled up his pants, he told staff he was receiving help with is belt. Both patients immediately separated themselves, he went to his room. Female patient states she thinks (R4) is her husband and she wants to be with him. When staff asked (R4) if he knew her, he says he doesn't know her, just…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-10 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to consistently and accurately reconcile narcotic medication counts in accordance with professional standards of practice for 1 of 3 residents (R2) reviewed for narcotic medication in a sample of 8. The findings include: R2's facility Initial Report dated 8/20/24 documents in part: The purpose of this letter is to notify The Department of a possible drug diversion. It was noted that resident Received his 8am dose of morphine but when the nurse went to give the 10 am dose the morphine could not be located. All notifications have been made. The facility has initiated an investigation into the matter. A final report will follow. R2's facility Final Report dated 8/26/24 documents in part an undated and untimed interview with V11 (LPN/Licensed Practical Nurse). V11 stated she stayed over from midnight shift to help pass the back half of 300 hall medications. V11 stated she and V4 (LPN) counted the narcotics for the front part of the hallway but not the back because she was still using the cart to pass medications. V11 stated R2's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-25 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents were free from verbal abuse for 1 of 3 (R3) residents reviewed for abuse in a sample of 11. This failure resulted in (V21), Registered Nurse telling R3 to go away and get lost she was too tired for this nonsense and if he didn't she was going to kick him in the forehead. This would cause a reasonable person to react with feelings of fear, anxiety, and humiliation. This past non-compliance occurred between 5/26/24 and 5/28/24. Findings Include: The initial incident report received by the Illinois Department of Public Health on 5/26/24 documents an incident date of 5/26/24. The Initial Incident Description documents Resident: (R3). The purpose of this letter is to notify the Department of allegations reported by staff regarding alleged verbal abuse between a nurse and resident. The untitled document dated 5/31/24 documents it is the Final report of an abuse allegation related to R3. This same report documents, It was immediately reported…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-11 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide daily denture/oral hygiene care for 4 of 4 residents (R1, R7, R5, R6) reviewed for ADL (Activities of Daily Living) care in the sample of eleven. Findings include: 1. R1's Face Sheet documented an admission Date of 12/27/23 and listed diagnoses including Congestive Heart Failure, Anxiety Disorder, and Chronic Kidney Disease. R1's 1/5/24 Minimum Data Set (MDS) documented that R1 had severe deficits in cognitive function and required moderate assistance from staff for oral hygiene and denture care . On 6/4/24 at 8:20am, V4, Family Member of R1, stated she had noted on several occasions that R1's dentures were yellow, odorous, and covered with layers of caked on food particles. 2. R7's Face Sheet documented an admission Date of 8/19/17 and listed diagnoses including Multiple Sclerosis and Diabetes Type 2. R7's 3/2/24 MDS documented that R6 had minimal deficits in cognitive functioning, had range of motion impairment to both upper extremities, and requires set up and clean up assistance for oral hygiene and denture…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-05-24 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to respond to resident call lights in a timely manner for 4 (R23, R32, R56, R92, R103) of 5 residents reviewed for resident rights in the sample of 51. Findings Include: 1. R32's admission Record documented R32 as being a [AGE] year-old male with an initial admission date to the facility as 2/6/23. Diagnoses on this form included but were not limited to: Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease; Chronic Respiratory Failure with Hypoxia; Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus without complications. On 05/21/24 at 10:58 AM, R32 was observed being alert and oriented to person, place, and time during this interview. R32 stated his only complaint he has is the amount of time it takes staff to answer the call lights. R32 stated he can't say it consistently occurs on a specific shift or time, but stated the average wait time to have his call light answered is 15 minutes. R32 stated he is able to confirm the times expressed by evidence of watching the clock, which was visible. R32…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-24 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to notify resident representatives in writing of hospital transfers for 2 of 2 (R36, R71) residents reviewed for hospitalization in a sample of 51. The Findings Include: 1. R36's admission profile documents and admission date of 9/12/23. This same document lists V8 (Family Member) as the Power of Attorney (POA). R36's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents a 7 for a Brief interview of Mental Status (BIMS) indicating a cognitive impairment. R36's progress notes document that 4/22/24 R36 was transported to the local emergency room after experiencing a change in condition. 2. R71's admission profile sheet documents an original admission date of 8/7/23. This same document lists V9 (Family Member/Power of Attorney) as the emergency contact. R71's 4/21/24 Quarterly MDS documents a BIMS score of 9 indicating a cognitive impairment. R71's progress notes documents that on 11/23/23 R71 was transported to the local emergency room due to experiencing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-24 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to notify resident representatives in writing of the bed hold policy during resident transfer for 2 of 2 (R71 and R36) residents reviewed for hospitalization in a sample of 51. The Findings Include: 1. R36's admission profile documents and admission date of 9/12/23. This same document lists V8 (Family Member) as the Power of Attorney (POA). R36's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents a 7 for a Brief interview of Mental Status (BIMS) indicating a cognitive impairment. R36's progress notes document that 4/22/24 R36 was transported to the local emergency room after experiencing an change in condition. 2. R71's admission profile sheet documents an original admission date of 8/7/23. This same document lists V9 (Family Member/Power of Attorney) as the emergency contact. R71's 4/21/24 Quarterly MDS documents a BIMS score of 9 indicating a cognitive impairment. R71's progress notes documents that on 11/23/23 R71 was transported to the local…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-24 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to revise a care plan to include medications ordered for a Urinary Tract Infection (UTI) for 1 (R115) of 24 residents reviewed for care plans in the sample of 51. Findings Include: R115's admission Record documented R115 as a [AGE] year old with an admission date to the facility of 03/29/2024. Diagnosis listed include other nontraumatic intracerebral hemorrhage, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Parkinsonism, Aphasia following nontraumatic intracerebral hemorrhage, obstructive and reflux uropathy, gastrostomy, muscle weakness, cerebral infarction, hyperlipidemia, essential hypertension, obstructive sleep apnea. R115's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 4/5/24 documented 0 under section C0100 titled Should brief Interview for Mental Status be conducted?, indicating the resident is rarely / never understood. R115's current Order Summary Report documented Bactrim 800-160 mg (milligrams) two times a day for bacterial infection with an order date of 05/20/2024. Review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-24 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure as needed psychotropic medications were ordered for a specific duration for 2 (R52, R103) of 7 reviewed for unnecessary medications in the sample of 51. Findings Include: 1. R103's admission Record documented R103 as being an [AGE] year-old male with an original admission date to the facility as 9/13/23. Diagnoses on this form included but were not limited to: Generalized Anxiety Disorder; Restlessness and Agitation; Unspecified Dementia, Unspecified Severity, with Agitation. R103's Order Details include an order with a start date of 2/28/24 for, LORazepam Oral Tablet 0.5 MG (Lorazepam) *Controlled Drug* Give 1 tablet by mouth every 12 hours as needed for behaviors and increased anxiety. No duration for the use of this medication was noted. 2. R52's admission Record documented R52 as being a [AGE] year-old female with an original admission date to the facility as 12/27/23. Diagnoses on this form included but were not limited to: Generalized…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-14 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to notify the resident in writing of the reason for transfer/discharge for 1 of 1 (R5) residents reviewed for transfer/discharges in the sample of 7. Findings Include: R5's admission Record with a print date of 5/7/24 documents R5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include Wernicke's encephalopathy, dementia, alcohol dependence with alcohol induced dementia, anxiety, insomnia, other seizures, and alcohol abuse with unspecified alcohol induced disorder. R5's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents in Section C that Cognitive skills for daily decision making are severely impaired. A Brief Interview of Mental Status was unable to be completed due to R5 rarely/never understood. R5's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 2/26/24 documents under Section GG, R1 is independent for all functional abilities, except he requires supervision for tub/shower transfer. R5's Care Plan with an admission date of 1/20/24 documents a focus area of R5 has…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-12-04 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — patternEnsure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to serve meals at the facility's designated scheduled times for 3 of 3 residents (R1, R2, R4 and R5) reviewed for meal service in the sample of 6. Findings include: The undated Facility document titled, Dining Service Meal Times documents: 4. Meals and snacks will be served at the following times: lunch 12 (with 12 handwritten in). 6. Meals will be served no more than 30 minutes after scheduled meal times. On 12/02/23 while watching the lunch meal service it was noted at 1:20 PM R4 received her lunch, at 1:26 PM R2 received his lunch and at 1:28 PM R1 received his lunch. On 12/02/23 at 1:30 PM, V2 (Director of Nursing) stated, they last lunch tray has just been delivered (at 1:30 PM). V2 stated, lunch was to be served at 12:00 PM. On 12/03/23 at 10:00 AM, V3 (Dietary Manager) stated, breakfast is at 7:30 AM, lunch is at 12:00 PM and dinner is at 5:00 PM. V3 (Dietary Manager) stated, she is new, she has only been at the facility for three weeks and is trying to get some procedures worked out in the kitchen. V3…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-04-20 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolatedEnsure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, record review and observation the facility failed to develop and implement a plan of care for the use of a physical restraint for 1 of 1 (R57) resident reviewed for physical restraints in a sample of 39. Findings included: Per R57's EHR (electronic health record) under Diagnosis tab documents R57 was admitted to this facility on 1/24/2020 with diagnoses of Unspecified Dementia with Agitation, Reduced Mobility, Anxiety Disorder, Restlessness and Agitation and History of Falls among others. On 4/17/2023 at 10:30am, V2 (Director of Nursing/DON) said R57 was the only resident who was physically restrained at this facility. V2 said the restraint is a tabletop that buckles behind R57's chair and prevents R57 from standing up and falling. V2 said they call the restraint an Activity Table. V2 said R57 has a high fall occurrence, and every other type of intervention has been tried before applying the tabletop restraint. V2 said the nursing staff monitor and document the tabletop restraint usage, including when it's removed and reapplied. V2 said the restraint is on R57's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$86,553 in federal fines across 3 penalties.
- $16,350 — penalty dated 2026-06-03
- $58,737 — penalty dated 2025-02-18
- $11,466 — penalty dated 2024-05-14
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to TUTERA SENIOR LIVING & HEALTH CARE — 25 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 3 of 5 | 2.0 | +1.0 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 3 of 5 | 2.2 | +0.8 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 1.7 | +0.3 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 3 of 5 | 3.0 | ≈ chain avg |
The other 24 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.0★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WALNUT CREEK MANAGEMENT COMPANY LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 10% | since 01/24/2022 |
| BROOKS, KILEY | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 01/24/2022 |
| GANNON, JEFF | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 01/24/2022 |
| TUTERA, JOSEPH | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 05/12/2010 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 6 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $2.3M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 21% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in IL
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Illinois Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 145256. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-07-28, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.