No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

St Paul's Senior Community

1021 West E Street, Belleville, IL 62220 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 108 certified beds · (618) 233-2095 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Dec 20232 immediate-jeopardy citations1 immediate-jeopardy citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)1 actual-harm citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)$227,658 in federal fines1 Medicare payment denial
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Dec 2023
  • inspectors cited 2 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
  • inspectors recorded 2 serious findings as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (40) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $227,658 in federal fines (most recent 2025-01-17)
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (61%) runs well above the national median (45%)
  • about 17% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 2 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★★ 5/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
222 W Main St · (888) 414-4838 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
8601 W Main St Ste 104 · (618) 398-4400 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
1017 W Main St · (618) 698-0453 · Call to confirm hours
Park
401 Catawba Ave · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 2 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 2 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 2 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased15.5%13.4%15.4%typical
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight9.6%6.3%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.2%0.9%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.3%1.5%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms44.3%54.2%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury6.0%3.1%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened24.5%14.3%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication26.5%18.3%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine97.7%91.8%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers8.4%4.8%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control23.7%20.6%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table17.3%21.7%17.1%typical
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication2.6%2.2%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine32.7%63.1%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission23.9%26.1%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit11.8%13.9%12.0%typical
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.342.021.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.992.221.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

46.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 291 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

46.3%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.7%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
51.9%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.34U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.12hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.17hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 51.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 104 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.34 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 58% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 7% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF46.3%CMS range 40.3–52.051.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.7%CMS range 7.9–13.010.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge51.9%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge38.5%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge54.8%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting97.7%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay1.3%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened4.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.2%CMS range 4.7–9.77.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.021.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.39
RN hours/ resident / day
1.11
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.18
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.68
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.26
RN hoursweekends
60.8%
Total nursing turnover
71.4%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 108 beds and averages 99.5 residents a day — about 92% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.68 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.39 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.18 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.32 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.83 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.45 to 0.26 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 61% is well above the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

3
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-01-17)
6
at the previous standard inspection (2023-12-05)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

40 citations, most serious first. The 20 most serious are shown; the remaining 20 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-04-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure proper transfer techniques to prevent falls and injuries for one of 7 residents (R2) reviewed for supervision to prevent falls in the sample of 7. This failure resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy when V8, Certified Nurse's Aide (CNA) transferred R2 incorrectly causing R2 to sustain bilateral femur (thigh) fractures and expiring on 04/14/24. This past non-compliance occurred from 04/11/24 to 04/12/24. The Immediate Jeopardy began on 4/11/24, when V8 attempted to transfer R2 by herself, and R2 falling and sustaining bilateral femur fractures. On 4/17/24, at 2:17 PM, V1, Administrator, V25, Regional Corporation Nurse and V26, Director of Clinical Operations were notified of the Immediate Jeopardy. The surveyor confirmed by observation, interview, and record review, that the Immediate Jeopardy was removed, and the deficient practice was corrected, on 4/12/24, prior to the start of the survey and was therefore Past Noncompliance. Findings include: R2's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Immediate jeopardy · J2023-12-05 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain residents' highest practicable physical well-being by assessing and providing timely care and treatment of fractures for 1 of 3 residents (R22) reviewed for quality of care in the sample of 43. This failure resulted in R22 not receiving timely care and treatment for three days after a fall. When R22 was sent to the hospital for treatment, it was identified that he had bilateral femur fractures and a dislocated knee. The Immediate Jeopardy began on 11/23/23 when R22 had a syncope episode during a transfer by V14, Certified Nurse's Aide (CNA) with a sit-to stand lift. The facility did not conduct an assessment after this incident to ensure the safest mode of transfer for R22. Again on 11/24/23, R22 had another syncope episode while being transferred with a sit to stand lift. On 11/26/23, after having pain throughout the day, R22 was sent to the hospital. R22's sustained severely displaced fracture of the right proximal femur shaft, a severely…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2023-12-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY A. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to assess for and provide safe transfer techniques to prevent falls/injury for 1 of 14 residents (R22) reviewed for safe transfer techniques to prevent injury/falls in the sample of 43. This failure resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy when the facility failed to reassess R22 for the safest mode of transfer after having syncope episodes while being transferred with a sit-to stand lift. R22 sustained severely displaced fracture of the right proximal femur shaft, severely comminuted distal left femoral fracture with displacement of the knee joint. R22 has had two surgeries, a blood transfusion and remains in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU). The Immediate Jeopardy began on 11/23/23 when R22 had a syncope episode during a transfer by V14, Certified Nurse's Aide (CNA) with a sit-to stand lift. The facility did not conduct an assessment after this incident to ensure the safest mode of transfer for R22. Again on 11/24/23, R22 had another syncope episode while…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-02-24 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure respiratory care needs met current standards of practice for 5 of 6 (R1, R2, R4, R5, R6) reviewed for respiratory care. This failure resulted in R1 experiencing chest pain and tightness, shortness of breath and decreased oxygen saturations after R1 did not receive ordered nebulizer treatments. Findings include: 1.R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of, in part, acute on chronic congestive heart failure (CHF), lymphedema and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], documented R1 is cognitively intact, and is on oxygen therapy. R1's Care Plan dated 2/18/25 documented R1 has oxygen therapy related to shortness of breath (SOB); R1 has pneumonia, give medications as ordered, monitor/document for side effects and effectiveness; R1 has asthma related to COPD, give nebulizer treatments and oxygen therapy as ordered, monitor for signs and symptoms of impending asthma attack:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-02-10 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to maintain residents' pride and dignity for 3 of 5 residents (R1, R3, R5) reviewed for resident dignity in the sample of 5. This failure resulted in expressed feelings of embarrassment and frustration. The Findings Include: 1. R1's admission Record, dated 2/5/25, documents R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), Respiratory Failure, Malignant Neoplasm of bronchus or lung, Hypertension (HTN), Morbid Obesity, Diverticulosis, Sleep Apnea, Nicotine Dependence, Lymphedema, Pulmonary HTN, Congestive Heart Disease (CHF), and Peripheral Vascular Disease (PVD). R1's Care Plan, dated 1/24/25, documents R1 has COPD: Interventions: Give aerosol or bronchodilators as ordered, give oxygen therapy as ordered by the physician, monitor for difficulty breathing (Dyspnea) on exertion, remind resident not to push beyond endurance, monitor for signs/symptoms of acute respiratory insufficiency. It…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-06-12 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to provide complete and timely incontinent care using proper technique; and failed to perform hand hygiene and glove changes for 3 of 4 residents (R6, R7, R8) reviewed for incontinence care in the sample of 10. This failure resulted in R7 obtaining a Urinary Tract Infection, (UTI), and being placed on an Antibiotic. The findings include: 1. R7's Face Sheet, undated, documents R7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses of Hypertension, (HTN), Respiratory Failure, Atrial-Fibrillation, (A-Fib), Chronic Kidney Disease, (CKD)-stage 3, Type 2 Diabetic Mellitus, (DM), Congestive Heart Failure, (CHF), Cardiac pacemaker, Atherosclerotic Heart Disease, (ASHD), and Hyperlipidemia. R7's Care Plan, dated 3/7/24, documents R7 has bladder incontinence. Interventions: the resident uses disposable briefs. Change, establish voiding patterns, R7 is Incontinent: Check the resident and as required for incontinence, wash, rinse and dry perineum,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2024-03-08 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from significant medication errors for 1 of 6 residents (R2) reviewed for medication errors in the sample of 13. This failure resulted in R2 having a drop in blood pressure requiring hospitalization, intravenous fluids, and blood pressure support medication. This past non-compliance occurred on 2/26/24. Findings include: 1-R2's Face Sheet documents R2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Atrial Fibrillation, Supraventricular Tachycardia, Myocardial Infarction, Cognitive Communication Deficit, need for assistance with personal care, Hypertension, and Hypotension. R2's Care Plan dated 11/28/23 documents, (R2) has Hypertension. Give anti-hypertensive medications as ordered. Monitor for side effects such as orthostatic hypotension and increased heart rate (tachycardia) and effectiveness. The Care Plan also documents, (R2) is on diuretic therapy r/t (related to) hypertension. Many other medications may…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2023-12-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation and record review, the facility failed to implement fall interventions to prevent falls for 3 of 3 residents (R1, R2, R3) reviewed for falls in the sample of 3. This failure resulted in R1 sustaining a laceration to her left eye and R2 sustaining a left hip fracture. Findings include: 1. R1's Face Sheet, undated, documents R1 has a diagnosis of Dementia, Osteoporosis, Stage 3 Chronic Kidney Disease and Type 2 Diabetes. R1's MDS (Minimum Data Set), dated 10/23/23, documents R1 has severe cognitive impairment, is dependent with toileting, bed mobility and transfers and has a history of falls. R1's Care Plan, dated 7/1/22, documents R1 is at risk for falls with an intervention, dated 12/4/23, not to leave R1 in her room unattended. R1's Fall Risk Assessment, dated 9/24/23, documents R1 is at high risk for falls. R1's Progress Note, dated 12/3/23 at 8:16 PM, documents resident fell out of her reclining wheelchair around 6:55 PM. The aide stated that she stepped out of the room to go…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2023-12-05 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed/neglected to prevent abuse/neglect for 4 of 5 residents (R22, R29, R53, R69) reviewed for abuse/neglect in the sample of 43. This failure resulted in R22 not being assessed timely and provided care and treatment after sustaining a fall that resulted in two fractured femurs and a dislocated knee. This failure also resulted in R53 being abused by an employee, with bruising, bleeding, and pain to her lower leg. Findings Include: 1. R22's Face Sheet, undated, documents R22 has the following diagnoses: Rheumatoid Arthritis, Weakness, Bilateral Osteoarthritis of the Knees and Abnormalities of Gait and Mobility. R22's Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documents R22 is cognitively intact and is dependent with transfers. R22's Care Plan, dated 8/17/23, documents R22 is at risk for falls. R22's Progress Note, dated 11/23/23 at 8:30 PM, documents R22 was being assisted to bed with two Certified Nursing Assistants, CNAs, per sit to stand mechanical lift, staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2022-12-07 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to assess and monitor pressure ulcers, ensure pressure ulcer treatments/services are administered per standards of practice and orders are administered per physician's orders (PO) for 1 of 7 residents (R8) reviewed for pressure ulcers in the sample of 40. This failure resulted in R8's unstageable pressure ulcer to right buttocks/thigh worsening and becoming infected. Findings include: R8's Face Sheet documents R8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including osteomyelitis of vertebra, sacral and sacrococcygeal region, pressure ulcer of sacral region: Stage 4 (full thickness tissue loss with exposed bone, tendon or muscle; slough or eschar may be present on some parts of the wound bed; often includes undermining and tunneling) pressure ulcer, moderate protein-calorie malnutrition, Alzheimer's disease, muscle weakness, unspecified abnormalities of gait (ambulation) and mobility, and need for assistance with personal care.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-18 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure food was stored and prepared in a manner which prevents potential contamination for 4 of 6 residents (R10, R11, R13, and R14) reviewed for food safety in the sample of 16.On 6/15/2026 at 11:50 PM, R11 stated the food was not always hot and they have complained about it, but it is still an issue. On 6/15/2026 at 11:54 PM, R13 stated her food is cold. They really need to make sure the food stays warm. This has been going on for a while now. I am not a big fan of pork, and we sure do have a lot of pork on the menu. On 6/15/2026 at 11:55 PM, R14 stated the food is not always hot and they have complained, and it is still not getting better. On 6/15/2026 at 11:58 PM, R10 stated the food is hit and miss, and it is cold more often than it is hot. On 6/15/2026 at 12:01 PM, V42, Dietary Aid was in the kitchenette dining area on the second floor, and she was taking temperatures from the stove. After taking the temperature of each item she did not record any temperatures in the book. V12 did not sanitize between…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-27 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provided timely turning/repositioning and incontinent care to prevent pressure ulcers/injuries from worsening or developing new pressure ulcers/injuries for 1 of 4 residents (R50) reviewed for pressure ulcers in a sample of 47. Findings Include: R50's Face Sheet, documents that she has diagnoses of but not limited to primary osteoarthritis of right and left hand, pressure ulcer of sacral region, stage 4, and peripheral vascular disease. R50's Minimum Data Set (MDS), documents that R50 is cognitively intact with a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of 13 out of 15 and she is dependent on staff for all her activities of daily living (ADLs). R50 is always incontinent of bowel and bladder. R50s, Care Plan, documents that R50 has impairment to skin integrity related to (r/t) pressure injury to coccyx r/t pain, bladder incontinence, decreased mobility and poor circulation. R50 refuses repositing at times. Interventions include but are not limited to administer treatments as ordered and monitor for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-12 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation and record review, the facility failed to serve food at palatable temperatures for 5 of 7 residents (R1, R6, R7, R8, R9) reviewed for Food and Nutrition Services in a sample of 13. Findings include:1.R1's Facesheet documented he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. 2.R6's Facesheet documented he was admitted to the facility on [DATE].3.R7's Facesheet documented he was admitted to the facility on [DATE].4. R8's Facesheet documented he was admitted to the facility on [DATE].5.R9's Facesheet documented he was admitted to the facility on [DATE].On 3/9/26 at 11:22 AM, V3 (dietary director) stated they are serving turkey wraps with sweet potato fries and mixed vegetables with pudding for dessert. V3 stated they temped all the wraps prior to putting them in the coolers and they will be re-temped once they get to the floors. V3 calibrated this surveyor's thermometer to be 32.5 degrees and will subtract 0.5 from all findings. At 11:47 AM, the turkey wraps temped at 49.8 degrees and V3…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-09 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, and record review, the Facility failed to ensure food served was appetizing and at a palatable temperature for 1 of 3 residents (R4) reviewed for food and nutritional services in the sample of 6.Findings include: 1-R4's Face Sheet documents R4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of paraplegia. R4's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented R4 was cognitively intact and was independent with eating. R4's Diet Order dated 3/19/25 documented R4 was on a carbohydrate controlled diet. On 1/6/26 at 10:30 AM, R4 stated the food is always cold and lacks flavor. On 1/6/25 at 12:41 PM, a test tray was conducted using a metal calibrated thermometer after the last resident tray was served. The beef tacos measured 110 Fahrenheit (F), the broccoli measured 107 F, and the rice measured 101 F. The broccoli was mushy and light green in color. The Facility's Resident Council Meeting Minutes dated 11/28/25 document cold food as an issue/concern. The Facility's Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-25 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 2 of 4 residents (R3, R5) reviewed for resident rights were treated with dignity and respect by allowing staff to use personal cell phones excessively during work hours in the sample of 5. Findings include:On 11/21/25 at 2:19 PM, V6, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA), was sitting at a table in the 1 South Dining Room looking at a cell phone.On 11/22/25 at 5:20 AM, V15, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), was sitting at the 1 South Nurse's Station looking at a cell phone.On 11/22/25 at 5:25 AM, V16, CNA, was sitting at a table in the 1 South Dining Room looking at a cell phone.1-R3's Face Sheet documents R3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including age related physical debility and muscle wasting and atrophy.R3's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented R3 was moderately cognitively impaired.On 11/21/25 at 11:00 AM, R3 stated staff are frequently on their cell phones at work.2-R5's Face Sheet documents R5 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-25 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolated
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation and record review, the Facility failed to follow its approved menu for 2 of 4 residents (R2, R3) reviewed for dietary services in the sample of 5. Findings include:1-R2's Face Sheet documents R2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease.R2's Diet Order dated 10/16/25 documents R2 is on a mechanical soft diet.The Facility's Mechanical Soft Menu for 11/21/25 documents ground sausage links will be served at Breakfast.R2's 11/21/25 Meal Ticket for Breakfast documents ground sausage will be served. On 11/21/25 at 8:51 AM, V5, Dietary Aid, began plating food for breakfast service.On 11/21/25 at 9:05 AM, V3, Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON), served R2 breakfast in the 1-South Dining Room. There were cubes of a white colored meat on the plate that were approximately one-half inch in size.On 11/21/25 at 9:07 AM, V5 stated she would not know what kind of meat was on R2's plate.On 11/21/25 at 9:10 AM, V6, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA), was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-25 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the Facility failed to provide meals at palatable temperatures for 1 of 4 residents (R3) reviewed for food and nutritional services in the sample of 5.Findings include:1-R3's Face Sheet documents R3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including age related physical debility and muscle wasting and atrophy.R3's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented R3 was moderately cognitively impaired.R3's Diet Order dated 2/21/25 documents R3 is on a carbohydrate controlled, no added salt diet.On 11/21/25 at 11:00 AM, R3 stated sometimes the food is served cold.The Facility's Resident Council Meeting Minutes dated 10/24/25 document cold food as an issue/concern.On 11/25/25 at 8:27 AM, V2, Director of Nursing (DON), stated the food should consistently be served hot.The Facility's Undated Monitoring Food Temperatures for Meal Service Policy documents food temperatures will be monitored daily to prevent foodborne illness and ensure foods are served at palatable…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-17 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the Facility failed to ensure nurse aids had the skills and competencies to care for 1 of 3 residents with urinary catheters (R2) in the sample of 3.Findings include: 1-R2's Face Sheet documents R2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including paraplegia and neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder.R2's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented R2 was independent with cognitive skills for daily decision making, required partial assistance with rolling from side to side, was dependent for transfer, and had indwelling catheter.R2's Physician Order dated 8/27/25 documents R2 has indwelling urinary catheter with diagnosis of neurogenic bladder.R2's Care Plan initiated 6/3/24 documents R2 has a catheter related to neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder and will remain free from catheter-related trauma.R2's Progress Note by V7, Registered Nurse, on 9/10/25 at 5:31 PM documents R2 stated V4 Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) pulled on his catheter. The catheter…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-05 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, and record review, the Facility failed to provide appetizing food at palatable temperatures for 3 of 5 residents (R1, R2, R5) reviewed for food and nutrition services in the sample of 5.Findings Include:1- R1's Face Sheet documents he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including gastric ulcer, end stage renal disease, and muscle wasting and atrophy.R1's 8/15/25 Diet Order documents liberal renal precautions; no orange juice or bananas; limit potatoes and tomatoes; provide double protein portions three times daily; restrict fluid to 1500 mL (milliliter) in 24 hours.R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented R1 was cognitively intact.On 9/4/25 at 9:20 AM, R1 stated the food is not good and is always cold.2-R2's Face Sheet documents R2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including stage 3 sacral pressure ulcer, burns involving 50-59% of body surface, dependence on renal dialysis, and muscle wasting and atrophy.R2's 8/12/25 Diet Order…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-05 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the Facility failed to ensure always available alternative options were available for 2 of 5 residents (R2, R5) reviewed for food and nutrition services in the sample of 5.1-R2's Face Sheet documents R2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including stage 3 sacral pressure ulcer, burns involving 50-59% of body surface, dependence on renal dialysis, and muscle wasting and atrophy.R2's 8/12/25 Diet Order documents renal diet; no orange juice, oranges, bananas, or milk; limit tomatoes and potatoes to one meal per day.R2's MDS dated [DATE] documented R2 was cognitively intact. On 9/4/25 at 9:45 AM, R2 stated the Facility has an alternative menu, but is always told they do not have the items he requests.2-R5's Face Sheet documents R5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including unspecified pressure ulcer of sacral region, muscle wasting and atrophy, and need for assistance with personal care.R5's 11/14/24 Physician Order documents pureed diet…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 20 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-01 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolated
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review the facility failed to provide diets as ordered and failed to follow pre-planned meals for 2 of 4 residents (R3, R4) in a sample of 7. Findings Include: 1. On 3/28/2025 at 9:10 AM, R3 stated he does not always get what he orders from the facility's menu, due to the facility running out of food or not having what is listed on the menu for that meal. R3's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents R3 is cognitively intact. R3's Physician Order dated 3/19/2025 documents R3 is on a Consistent Carbohydrate diet with regular texture and liquid consistency. 2. On 3/28/2025 at 11:52 AM, R4 stated she is on a mechanical soft diet and will receive 2 items on her tray but will not always receive 3 or 4 items. R4 stated the facility does not always have available what is listed on the menu. R4's MDS dated [DATE] documents R4 is mildly cogitatively impaired and needs supervision or touching assistance with eating. R4's Physician Order dated 3/4/2025 at 7:38 PM, documents R4 has a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-02-10 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to provide sufficient staff to care and tend to resident needs for 4 of 5 residents (R1, R2, R3, R5) reviewed for sufficient staffing in the sample of 5. The Findings Include: 1. R1's admission Record, dated 2/5/25, documents R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), Respiratory Failure, Malignant Neoplasm of bronchus or lung, Hypertension (HTN), Morbid Obesity, Diverticulosis, Sleep Apnea, Nicotine Dependence, Lymphedema, Pulmonary HTN, Congestive Heart Disease (CHF), and Peripheral Vascular Disease (PVD). R1's Care Plan, dated 1/24/25, documents R1 has an Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Self Care Performance Deficit. Interventions: Toilet Use: The resident requires (two) staff participation to use toilet, the resident requires assistance (specify: wash hands, adjust clothing, clean self, transfer onto toilet, transfer off toilet) to use toilet, Transfer: The resident requires…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to provide a safe transfer for 1 of 1 resident (R1) reviewed for resident safety in the sample of 4. The Findings Include: R1's admission Record, dated 2/5/25, documents R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), Respiratory Failure, Malignant Neoplasm of bronchus or lung, Hypertension (HTN), Morbid Obesity, Diverticulosis, Sleep Apnea, Nicotine Dependence, Lymphedema, Pulmonary HTN, Congestive Heart Disease (CHF), and Peripheral Vascular Disease (PVD). R1's Care Plan, dated 1/24/25, documents R1 has COPD: Interventions: Give aerosol or bronchodilators as ordered, give oxygen therapy as ordered by the physician, monitor for difficulty breathing (Dyspnea) on exertion, remind resident not to push beyond endurance, monitor for signs/symptoms of acute respiratory insufficiency. It continues R1 has oxygen (O2) Therapy related to shortness of breath (SOB). Interventions: The resident has…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-10 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on Interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to provide timely and complete incontinent care for 2 of 4 residents (R1, R3) reviewed for incontinence care in the sample of 5. The Findings Include: 1. R1's admission Record, dated 2/5/25, documents R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), Respiratory Failure, Malignant Neoplasm of bronchus or lung, Hypertension (HTN), Morbid Obesity, Diverticulosis, Sleep Apnea, Nicotine Dependence, Lymphedema, Pulmonary HTN, Congestive Heart Disease (CHF), and Peripheral Vascular Disease (PVD). R1's Care Plan, dated 1/24/25, documents R1 has bladder incontinence. Interventions: the resident uses disposable briefs, change (freq) and as needed (PRN), check the resident (freq) and as required for incontinence, wash, rinse, and dry perineum, change clothing PRN after incontinence episodes. R1 has bowel incontinence. Interventions: Provide bedpan/bedside commode, provide peri-care after each…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-10 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on Interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to provide oxygen (O2) to 1 of 3 residents (R2) that is Oxygen dependent, reviewed for residents on oxygen in the sample of 5. The Findings Include: 1. R2's admission Record, dated 2/5/25, documents R2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), Respiratory failure, Malnutrition, Thrombocytopenia, Hypertension (HTN), Anxiety disorder, Depression, Hyperlipidemia, and Dysphagia. R2's Care Plan, dated 1/24/25, documents R2 has Oxygen Therapy related to acute Respiratory Failure. Interventions: Oxygen Settings: The resident has O2 via nasal prongs/mask at three Liters (L) continuously. Humidified, monitor for signs/symptoms of respiratory distress and report to Medical Doctor (MD) as needed (PRN): Respirations, pulse oximetry, increased heart rate (Tachycardia), restlessness, diaphoresis, headaches, lethargy, confusion, atelectasis, hemoptysis, cough, pleuritic pain, accessory muscle…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-01-17 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure food was stored and prepared in a manner which prevents potential contamination. This has the potential to affect all 103 residents living in the facility. On 01/14/25 at 10:02 AM on the 100 South Hall there are two refrigerators in the kitchen unit, in the first refrigerator there was a non- resident refrigerator and inside was a block of yellow cheese slices approximate 30 slices that was not covered as the plastic wrap had come off and was exposing it to the air the top slice was leathery in texture, and all dried out. There was also a large styrofoam container containing some type of rice with vegetables inside of it that was not labeled or dated. On 1/14/2025 at 10:08 AM on the 100 South Hall in the resident refrigerator there was four cooked eggs in a metal container with no date or label. There was a large three-quart clear pitcher that was full and was brown in color with no date and or label. There was also a plastic container full of a brown meat like product that was not labeled and or dated.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-01-17 · tag F0851 — widespread
    Electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on Interview and Record Review the facility failed to submit the required Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ) data for the 4th quarter of 2024. This has the potential to affect all 103 residents in the facility. Findings include: PBJ report for the 4th quarter of 2024 dated 10/1/2024-12/31/2024, documents Low weekend staffing, RN (Registered Nurse) coverage for 8 consecutive hours/day, licensed nurse for 24 hours/day, one star staffing rating, failed to submit PBJ data. On 1/14/2025 V1, Administrator, provided a notice the facility received from the State Agency documenting the facility had failed to provide the required staffing information. On 1/17/2025 at 12:50PM V1, Administrator, stated the corporate office had a new employee. The PBJ data was submitted to the corporate office from our facility in a timely manner, but not submitted to CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services). On 1/17/2025 at 1:10PM V1, Administrator, stated facility has no policy regarding PBJ submission data.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-17 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to notify a family representative of a significant illness and test results for one of one resident (R31) reviewed for notification in the sample of 34. Findings include: R31's undated Face Sheet documents an admission date of 8/8/22 with a primary medical diagnosis of Syncope and Collapse. R31's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents R31 has moderate cognitive impairment. V4, R31's daughter, filed a grievance dated 10/11/14 documenting a concern for R31's well-being and the failure of staff to notify her of the results of x-rays. R31's chest x-ray dated 10/11/24 documents Impression: bronchovascular prominence with differential as above. No lobar consolidation is seen. There is some increased density at the left base suggestive of infiltrate. On 1/14/25 at 12:13 PM, V4 stated she did not receive notification her mother (R31) had pneumonia. V4 stated she emailed the Social Service Director (SSD) to get her mother tested because of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-29 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to protect resident's rights and treat each resident with dignity for 2 of 8 residents (R1 and R7) reviewed for resident rights in a sample of 10. Findings include: 1. R1's admission Record, with a print date of 08/29/24, documented R1 has diagnoses of but not limited to overactive bladder, hypertension, generalized weakness, diabetes, and low back pain. R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R1 is cognitively intact with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 out of 15, requires the use of a wheelchair, has an indwelling foley catheter and is frequently incontinent of bowel. R1's Care Plan, dated 08/15/2024, documented problems of but not limited to fall risk, pain due to fracture of the third vertebra, self-care deficit, potential impairment to skin integrity, and limited physical mobility. On 08/28/2024 at 10:20 AM, R1 stated the Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) have their earbuds in and are talking on their phones…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to adhere to infection control practices and policies related to the staff failing to change gloves and perform hand hygiene during resident care for 3 of 4 residents (R6, R7, R8) reviewed for infection control in the sample of 10. The findings include: 1. R7's Face Sheet, undated, documents R7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses of Hypertension, (HTN), Respiratory Failure, Atrial-Fibrillation, (A-Fib), Chronic Kidney Disease, (CKD)-stage 3, Type 2 Diabetic Mellitus, (DM), Congestive Heart Failure, (CHF), Cardiac pacemaker, Atherosclerotic Heart Disease, (ASHD), and Hyperlipidemia. R7's Care Plan, dated 3/7/24, documents R7 has bladder incontinence. Interventions: the resident uses disposable briefs. Change, establish voiding patterns, R7 is Incontinent: Check the resident and as required for incontinence, wash, rinse and dry perineum, change clothing PRN, (as needed), after incontinence episodes, monitor/document for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-08 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) provide appropriate catheter care, for 2 of 4 residents reviewed (R8, and R9) reviewed for catheter care in the sample of 13. Findings include: 1-R9's Face Sheet documents diagnoses including Other Specified Disorders of Kidney and Ureter; Chronic Kidney disease Stage 4; Hypertensive Chronic Kidney Disease with Stage 1 through 4 chronic kidney disease, or Unspecified Chronic Kidney Disease R9's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented R9 was cognitively intact, required substantial assistance with toileting and indwelling urinary catheter. R9's Undated Care Plan documents R9 has a catheter. The resident will show no s/sx (signs/symptoms) of urinary infection through review date. The Care Plan documents catheter care should be provided every shift and PRN (as needed). On 3/5/24 at 1:45PM there was a smell of urine in R9's room. R9's catheter was intact to gravity drainage in bag with cover…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-08 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, observation, and record review, the Facility failed to provide warm, palatable, appetizing meals for 3 of 4 residents (R2, R6, R8) reviewed for food palatability and temperature in the sample of 13. Findings include: On 3/3/24 at 9:45 AM, R6 stated the food is not good. On 3/3/24 at 9:54 AM, R2 stated the food is not served timely and is hardly ever at the correct temperature. On 3/5/24 at 12:25 PM, R8 stated the food is often served cold. On 3/5/24 at 12:55 PM, temperatures were obtained from a test tray using metal calibrated thermometer after the last resident tray was served. The taco measured 97.8° F (Fahrenheit), the refried beans measured 93.0° F, and the rice measured 104°F. On 3/5/24 at 12:56 PM, V7, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA), was asked whether residents complained about the food to which she smiled and stated, They like it piping hot. On 3/5/24 at 1:53 PM, V3, Dietary Manager, stated Those (temperatures) are all still cold. On 3/7/24 at 10:18 AM, V24, CNA, stated she tries to encourage residents to eat in the dining room so the food will be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-05 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement a person-centered care plan for falls for 1 of 29 residents (R39) reviewed for comprehensive care plans in the sample of 43. Findings Include: R39's Face Sheet, undated, documents R39 has the following diagnoses: Repeated Falls, Trans-Ischemic Attack (TIA), Alzheimer's Disease and Vascular Dementia. R39's Minimum Data Set, MDS, dated [DATE], documents R39 is severely cognitively impaired and has a history of falls. R39's Fall Risk Assessment, dated 10/17/23, documents R39 is at high risk for falls. R39 did not have a Care Plan addressing his fall risk or interventions to prevent falls. R39's Progress Note, dated 9/14/23 at 5:09 PM, documents R39 was observed on the floor by the bed. Vital signs were within normal limits (WNL). When asked what happened, R39 stated he was trying to get into bed. Denies hitting his heads. Neuro checks started due to fall being unwitnessed. Family and MD (medical doctor) made aware. R39's Progress Note, dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-05 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to assess, monitor, and treat pressure ulcers for 1of 8 residents (R48) reviewed for pressure ulcers in the sample of 43. Findings include: R48's Face Sheet documents an original admission date of 12/5/2019. Diagnosis include Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis Following Cerebral Infarction affecting right dominant side, Enterococcus, End Stage Renal Disease, Dysphasia. R48's Minimum Data Set, MDS, dated [DATE] documents R48 had mild cognitive impairment. MDS dated [DATE] documents R48 had right sided impairment and was dependent for toileting and bed mobility. MDS dated [DATE] documents R48 is at risk for pressure ulcers and had no pressure ulcers at this time. R48's Care Plan, updated 11/9/2023, documents R48 has potential/actual impairment to skin integrity. Interventions include Administer treatments as ordered and monitor for effectiveness. Monitor pressure areas for changes in color, sensation, temperature, and report any change to nurse. Pressure…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-05 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolated
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents were not given unnecessary antibiotics for 1 of 6 residents (R6) reviewed for antibiotic stewardship in the sample of 43. Findings Include: R6's Physician Order Sheet, documents an order, dated 7/27/23, for Macrobid 100 milligrams by mouth one time a day for prophylaxis. R6's Care Plan, dated 10/25/23, documents R6 has reoccurring Urinary Tract Infections and is on an antibiotic prophylactically. On 12/01/23 at 1:03 PM V9, Licensed Practical Nurse/Infection Control Preventionist, stated when a resident is prescribed an antibiotic prophylactically, she will notify the physician that the antibiotic doesn't meet criteria and then the physician will let her know what to do. V9 stated she does not expect residents to be prescribed antibiotics unnecessarily. The Infection Prevention and Control Manual Antibiotic Stewardship, dated 2017, documents antibiotics will be prescribed for the correct indication, dose, and duration to appropriately treat the resident while attempting to reduce the development of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-26 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to assess, monitor, and document respiratory assessment for 1 of 3 residents (R2) reviewed for respiratory care in the sample 10. Findings include: R2's admission Record, not dated, documents that R2 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease with (Acute) Exacerbation on [DATE] Primary Admitting Dx (diagnosis), Acute Respiratory Failure with Hypoxia. R2's Care Plan, dated [DATE], documents R2 had oxygen therapy with initiated date of [DATE]. The Intervention documented Encourage or assist with ambulation as indicated. Date Initiated: [DATE] The Care Plan did not address monitoring of R2's oxygen status. R2 admission Assessment Nursing Admission/readmission Data Collections, dated [DATE] at 5:25 PM documents that R2's respiration were normal, observed R2 experiencing shortness of breath while sitting and upon exertion, abnormal lungs that were diminished in lower lobes. It continues that R2 requires oxygen per nasal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-19 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide residents in writing, of the resident's change in Medicare coverage, for 1 of 1 resident (R7) reviewed for notification of Medicare Coverage in the sample of 8. This failure has the potential to affect all residents receiving Medicare Coverage. Findings Include: 1. R7's admission Record, undated, documents, R7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R7's Electronic Medical Record, documents, R7's Medical Diagnosis include, Arteriosclerotic Heart Disease, (ASHD), Hypertension, (HTN), Spondylosis w/Radiculopathy Lumbar, Irritable Bowel Syndrome, (IBS), Congested Heart Failure, (CHF), Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, (DM), Hyperlipidemia, Acute Kidney Failure, (AKF), Chronic Kidney Disease, (CKD). R7's Care Plan, dated 08/23/23, documents, R7 has an ADL, (Activities of Daily Living), Self-Care Performance Deficit r/t, (related to), Dementia and Impaired balance. Interventions: Resident ambulates with assistance, with wheeled walker, the resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-12-07 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide pressure ulcer care services in accordance with professional standards of care for 1 of 1 resident (R8) reviewed for professional standards of care in the sample of 40. Findings include: R8's Face Sheet documents R8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including osteomyelitis of vertebra, sacral and sacrococcygeal region; pressure ulcer of sacral region, stage 4; Alzheimer's disease, unspecified; muscle weakness, generalized; unspecified abnormalities of gait and mobility; and need for assistance with personal care. R8's Face Sheet documents diagnosis of pressure ulcer of right buttock, unstageable, on [DATE]. R8's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents R8 is at risk for developing pressure ulcers, has one stage 4 pressure ulcer that was present upon admission, and one unstageable pressure ulcer that was not present on admission. R8's Care Plan documents, (R8) has actual impairment to skin integrity r/t (related to)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the Facility failed to implement interventions to prevent falls for 1 of 10 residents (R71) reviewed for falls in the sample of 40. Findings include: R71's Face Sheet, undated, documents diagnoses of Left Femur Fracture, Muscle Weakness and Abnormalities of Gait and Mobility. R71's Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documents R71 has moderate cognitive impairment, requires assistance with activities of daily living (ADL) care and her balance is unsteady and she is only able to stabilize with staff assistance. R71's Care Plan, dated 8/17/22, documents R71 is at risk for falls. R71's Interventions are documented as follows: have her call light within reach (6/15/21), encourage to ask for assist with wheelchair transfer, offer resident snack or drink when brought out for meals while waiting for meal to be served, request for labs to be done, (9/15/22) resident educated to use call light for help instead of self-transfer, roommate moved to another room due to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2026-01-09 · tag F0732 — widespread
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the Facility failed to post nurse staffing information in a prominent place that was readily accessible to residents and visitors. This has the potential to affect all 99 residents living in the Facility.Findings include: On 1/8/26 at 8:32 AM, V18, Receptionist, was sitting at the front desk in the lobby of the Facility. She stated nursing assignments are posted back by the employee time clock. There was no visible staffing posted in the front lobby. On 1/8/26 at 8:35 AM, there was no nurse staffing visibly posted on Unit 1-South. V3, Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON), stated daily nurse staffing assignments are not posted in a place where residents and visitors can see. On 1/8/26 at 8:42 AM, there was no nurse staffing visibly posted on Unit 1-North. V7, Nurse Manager, stated nurse staffing is not posted for visitors. If a visitor wants to know which staff are caring for a certain resident the nurse can check their paperwork and let them know. On 1/8/26 at 10:04 AM, there was no nurse staffing visibly posted on Unit 2-North. On 1/8/26 at 10:07…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$227,658 in federal fines across 5 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

  • $83,317 — penalty dated 2025-01-17
  • $54,665 — penalty dated 2024-06-12
  • $16,801 — penalty dated 2024-04-18
  • $12,035 — penalty dated 2024-03-08
  • $60,840 — penalty dated 2023-12-05
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-03-12 for 23 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to TUTERA SENIOR LIVING & HEALTH CARE — 25 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 52.0-1.0 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.2-0.2 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 51.7-0.7 vs chain
Quality measures 2 of 53.0-1.0 vs chain
The other 24 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.0★, per CMS)
1 of 5Bethany Rehab & HccDekalb, IL 1 of 5Carlinville Rehab & HccCarlinville, IL 1 of 5Coulterville Rehab & HccCoulterville, IL 1 of 5Crystal Pines Rehab & HccCrystal Lake, IL 1 of 5Fair Oaks Rehab & HealthcareSouth Beloit, IL 1 of 5Grand Meadows Senior Living & Health CareAsbury, IA 1 of 5Hillsboro Rehab & HccHillsboro, IL 1 of 5Mattoon Rehab & HccMattoon, IL 1 of 5Metropolis Rehab & HccMetropolis, IL 1 of 5Moweaqua Rehab & HccMoweaqua, IL 1 of 5Windsor Estates Of St CharlesSaint Charles, MO 2 of 5The Village At MissionPrairie Village, KS 2 of 5Westview Of Derby Rehabilitation & Health Care CenDerby, KS 3 of 5Carnegie Village Rehabilitation & Health Care CentBelton, MO 3 of 5Dixon Rehab & HccDixon, IL 3 of 5Highland Rehabilitation & Health Care CenterKansas City, MO 3 of 5Lakeland Rehab & Healthcare CenterEffingham, IL 3 of 5Meridian Rehabilitation And Health Care CenterWichita, KS 3 of 5Monterey Park Rehabilitation & Health Care CenterIndependence, MO 3 of 5NorterreLiberty, MO 3 of 5Northland Rehabilitation & Health Care CenterKansas City, MO 3 of 5Stratford Commons Rehab & Health Care CenterOverland Park, KS 3 of 5Tiffany Springs Rehabilitation & Health Care CenteKansas City, MO 5 of 5Charlton Place Rehab And Healthcare CenterDeatsville, AL

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
TI-BELLEVILLE LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 12/01/2019
MERRITT, AMYIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 12/01/2019
BROOKS, KILEYIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 12/01/2019
GANNON, JEFFIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 12/01/2019

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$13.0M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-9.9%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$2.4M
Related-party expense17% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 36%Medicare 18%Other / private 47%

This home reported $2.4M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 17% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$390per resident / day
operating cost
$11,851per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$355per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IL

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Illinois Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Illinois
$8,304/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$9,216/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,219/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 146122. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-01-17, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next