No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Dixon Rehab & Hcc

800 Division Street, Dixon, IL 61021 · For profit - Corporation · 97 certified beds · (815) 284-3393 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (815) 284-3393 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Nov 2024Behavioral-health or dementia-care citations — no harm found (F0740, F0758)6 actual-harm citations$34,753 in federal fines1 Medicare payment denial
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (33% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Nov 2024
  • it has 6 actual-harm citations
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (21) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $34,753 in federal fines (most recent 2025-01-15)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 2 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★ 2/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
1672 S Galena Ave · (815) 564-2663 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
1640 S Galena Ave · (815) 288-7797 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Aldi0.7 mi
1760 S Galena Ave · (855) 955-2534 · Call to confirm hours
Park
700 E 7th St · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
1403 Hemlock Ave · (815) 284-8680

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 2 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 2 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased20.7%13.4%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight4.5%6.3%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.9%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection2.9%1.5%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms50.6%54.2%6.5%typical for the state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury7.1%3.1%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened23.7%14.3%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication19.0%18.3%18.9%typical
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine98.7%91.8%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers5.2%4.8%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control32.4%20.6%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table12.5%21.7%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%2.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine80.6%63.1%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission36.9%26.1%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit9.7%13.9%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days3.302.021.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.612.221.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

52.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 134 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

52.1%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.9%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
30.8%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.25U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.13hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.11hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 30.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 39 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.25 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 36% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 32% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF52.1%CMS range 44.3–59.751.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.9%CMS range 6.9–13.110.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge30.8%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge28.2%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge35.9%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified95.1%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting97.8%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay1.2%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened1.2%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization5.3%CMS range 3.2–9.67.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.031.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.81
RN hours/ resident / day
0.56
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.08
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.46
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.46
RN hoursweekends
33.3%
Total nursing turnover
18.2%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 97 beds and averages 71.7 residents a day — about 74% occupied, or roughly 25 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.46 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.81 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.08 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.03 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.63 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.95 to 0.46 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 33% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

10
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2024-10-23)
3
at the previous standard inspection (2023-12-21)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

21 citations, most serious first. The 16 most serious are shown; the remaining 5 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-01-15 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to identify an area of pressure before becoming a stage 3, failed to have a wound evaluated by a wound care professional and failed to assess and document an area of skin breakdown. This applies to one of three residents (R1) reviewed for pressure in the sample of three. This failure resulted in R1 sustaining a stage 3 pressure ulcer with 90% slough and necrotic tissue to her sacrum. The findings include: The facility face sheet for R1 shows she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include spinal stenosis, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, abnormalities of gait and mobility and urge incontinence. The facility assessment dated [DATE] shows R1 to have severe cognitive impairment and requires maximal assistance with her activities of daily living. The same assessment shows R1 was admitted to the facility with a risk of developing a pressure injury but did not currently have any. The facility's electronic health record census tabs shows R1 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-11-23 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to prevent pressure injuries for residents at risk for pressure, failed to initiate treatment orders when pressure injury was found, failed to monitor a pressure injury for signs and symptoms of infection for 2 of 4 residents (R1, R3) for pressure in the sample of 4. This failure resulted in R1 developing a Stage 3 pressure injury to her right heel that became infected and R3 developing two Stage 2 pressure injuries to his sacrum. The findings include: 1. R1's Nursing admission data collection dated 10/3/24 shows R1 was admitted on [DATE] due to hysterectomy with bladder sling, no impaired skin integrity, abdominal area has 3 small incision sites. On 11/23/24 at 8:47 AM, R1 was sitting up in a wheelchair at the dining room table eating breakfast. R1 had heel protective boots on both feet and a mechanical lift sling underneath her. R1 said she was doing ok and had the boots on because her foot hurt her. On 11/23/24 at 9:20 AM, V3 Registered…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-10-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure effective fall interventions were in place for resident's safety who is a high risk for falls and has a history of falls. This failure resulted in R45 falling out of bed and sustaining a left hip fracture needing surgical repair for 1 of 18 residents (R45) reviewed for safety in the sample of 18. The findings include: R45's Physician Order Sheet show R45 is [AGE] year old with diagnoses of vascular dementia, hypertension, weakness and left hip fracture R45's facility assessment dated [DATE] show R45 is severely cognitively impaired (BIMS of 1) R45's fall risk assessment dated [DATE] show R45 as a high risk for falls. On 10/21/24 at 9AM, R45 was in bed moaning I am sore. V19 (Registered Nurse) was with R45 at this time and said R45 has a hip fracture due to fall. On 10/21/24 at PM, V20 (R45's daughter) said she was very disappointed at the facility. My mom has had four (4) falls. All of these falls were her trying to go to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2024-10-23 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to accurately assess a residents weight loss and ensure nutritional interventions were implemented for a resident with significant weight loss. This failure resulted in R66's significant weight loss. This applies to 1 of 5 residents (R66) reviewed for weight loss in the sample of 18. The findings include: R66's face sheet shows he is a [AGE] year old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including muscle wasting, encounter for orthopedic aftercare following surgical amputation, acquired absence of left leg below the knee, type 2 diabetes, peripheral vascular disease, and a non-pressure chronic leg ulcer of right lower extremity. R66's weight report provided on 10/22/24 documents: 8/27/24- 208.8 lb (pounds) 9/24/24- 184 lb 10/8/24- 186 lb 10/17/24- 182.2 lb R66's electronic health medical record documents Regular Diet, Regular Texture, Regular liquid Consistancy. Needs double portions of meat, eggs and milk at each meal for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2024-10-23 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents pain was managed after undergoing hip surgery. This failure resulted in R45 experiencing severe pain to 1 of 18 residents (R45) reviewed for pain management in the sample of 18. The findings include: R45 has diagnoses that include fractured left hip undergoing hip surgery, dementia, hypertension and weakness. R45 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] after undergoing surgical repair to her left hip fracture caused by a fall. On 10/21/24 at 9AM, R45 was in bed moaning I am sore. V19 (Registered Nurse/RN) was with R45 at this time and said R45 has a hip fracture due to fall. On 10/21/24 at 12 PM, R45's room was closed but can hear audible moaning. This surveyor entered R45's room. R45 was in the bathroom sitting in the toilet seat. V18 (Certified Nursing Assistant) was with R45. R45 was crying in pain. It's sore!, it is so painful! I can't take this please, I can't, please help me, it hurt's so bad. V18 asked this surveyor…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-02-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the safety of a resident while ambulating in the shower room. This applies to one of three residents (R1) in the sample of three reviewed for safety and supervision. This failure resulted in R1 falling and sustaining a fractured right humerus, a fractured nose and a right frontal lobe brain hemorrhage. The findings include: The facility face sheet for R1 shows she has diagnoses to include congestive heart failure, hypertension, chronic kidney disease and has a history of falls. The facility assessment dated [DATE] for R1 shows her to be cognitively intact and uses a walker for ambulation. The same assessment shows R1 requires moderate assistance with showering. The fall risk assessment dated [DATE] shows R1 to be at a high risk for falls. The facility state report dated 2/6/24 shows R1 was walking into the shower room for her shower when she fell and obtained fractures to her right arm, a laceration to her right side of her forehead…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-06 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident (R1) was free from physical abuse of (R2) for two of three residents (R1, R2) reviewed for abuse in the sample of 7. The findings include: The State Report dated 10/27/24 for R1 showed, V1 (Administrator) was notified that R1 stated R2 smacked him. Investigation initiated. Staff attempting to assist in this situation and R2 kicked and struck the CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant). Residents separated from one another. R2 refused to let staff near him. R2 being sen out for further evaluation. Family of both residents notified. Provider notified. Police notified. Investigation completed. V9 (Laundry Aide) stated, when I was returning from break, R2 was at the door asking me for help to open the door so he can get out of his room, his roommate hit him. V5 stated that R2 has had a change in condition; the resident is currently experiencing altered mental status and aggressive behavior. He recently moved to the current room. This nurse was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-10-23 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility to ensure dishes were handled in a sanitary manner to prevent cross contamination. This failure has the potential to affect all 89 residents in the facility. The findings include: The facility's Long-Term Care Facility Application for Medicare and Medicaid form dated 10/21/24 showed the facility's resident census as 89 residents. On 10/22/24 at 9:32 AM, R15 Dietary Aide placed dirty dishes and cups onto a dishwasher rack and pushed the rack into the dishwasher to be cleaned. Without washing her hands, R15 then walked over to a tray of dry, clean dishes and began placing those dishes onto a storage rack. R15 repeated the same process again, of loading dirty dishes into the dishwasher and immediately touching clean dishes without washing her hands. On 10/22/4 at 11:44 AM, V16 Dietary Manager stated, if one staff member is operating the facility's dishwasher, the staff member is to wash their hands after touching dirty dishes and before touching clean dishes. V16 stated, If they don't wash their hands in between, I would be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-23 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — pattern
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure pressure ulcers were assessed, prescribed treatment orders were transcribed and provided, and treatment dressings were in place for residents with pressure ulcers. These failures apply to 4 of 5 (R179, R6, R66, R55) residents reviewed for pressure ulcers in the sample of 18. The findings include: 1. R179's face sheet shows she is a [AGE] year old female admitted to the facility on [DATE], from another facility. Her diagnoses include COPD, unspecified dementia without behavioral disturbance, type 2 diabetes, multiple sclerosis, gastrostomy status, unspecified cerebral infarction. On 10/21/24 at 9:24 AM, V7 (Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN) provided wound care to R179. V7 removed the soiled dressing from her coccyx. A round open area to her coccyx was observed. V7 cleansed the wound, applied calcium alginate and foam dressing but did not apply the medicated cream to the wound bed. V7 said R179's treatment order was santyl and calcium…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-23 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review that facility failed to ensure a resident with a diagnosis of congestive heart failure had daily weights performed as ordered for 1 of 18 residents (R15) reviewed for quality of care in the sample of 18. The findings include: R15's Face Sheet shows that she has diagnoses of acute on chronic combined systolic (congestive) and diastolic (congestive) heart failure (CHF), myocardial infarction, atrial fibrillation, chronic kidney disease, shortness of breath, hypertension, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and atherosclerotic heart disease. R15's Physician's Order Sheet shows an order dated 2/28/24 for daily weights for a diagnosis of CHF. R15's Weights and Vitals summary printed on 10/22/24 shows that between 7/13/24 and 10/22/24, R15 did not receive a weight on 7/13, 7/14, 7/15, 7/18, 8/7, 8/15, 8/16, 8/24, 8/29, 9/6, 9/14, 9/16, 9/26, 9/27, 9/28, 9/29, 10/2, 10/6, 10/8, 10/9, 10/13, 10/14, 10/16, 10/17, 10/19 and 10/21/24. On 10/22/24 at 12:58 PM, V2 (Director of Nursing) said that if weights are ordered daily for a resident, they should be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-23 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident received Passive Range of Motion (PROM) to her left upper and lower extremity and failed to ensure a splint was applied for 1 of 4 residents (R27) reviewed for range of motion in the sample of 18. The findings include: R27's Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] shows that her cognition is intact, she has an impairment of one side of her upper and lower extremity and has no rejections of care. On 10/21/24 at 9:00 AM, R27 had a contracted left hand. There was no splint in place on R27's left hand. R27 said that she is unable to move her left arm or left leg due to a stroke. On 10/22/24 at 8:45 AM, R27 was laying in bed. R27 did not have a splint on her left hand. On 10/23/24 at 8:40 AM, R27 said that they do not do exercises (ROM) on her left arm or left leg. R27 said that she did have a brace for her left hand in the past but they have not put it on her recently. R27 said that she would love exercises done to her left…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-23 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolated
    Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident who was experiencing increased depression received psychiatric services timely as prescribed. This applies to 1 of 18 residents (R29) reviewed for behavioral services in the sample of 18. The findings include: R29's face sheet shows he is a [AGE] year old male with diagnoses of hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting left non-dominant side, major depressive disorder, restlessness and agitation, calculus of kidney, unspecified psychosis, insomnia, hypertension and anxiety. On 10/21/24 at 10:25 AM, R29 was observed sitting in his wheelchair outside of his room with his call light on. He said he needed to use the bathroom. V7 and V18 (Both Certified Nursing Assistant's) assisted R29 to the bathroom using the mechanical stand lift. R29 did not express any concerns or behaviors. On 10/22/24 at 3:00 PM, R29 was observed in his room lying in bed. He said has made self-harm threats in the past, but says…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-23 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident's medications were administered according to standards of practice for 1 of 18 residents (R15) reviewed for storage of medications in the sample of 18. The findings include: On 10/21/24 at 9:03 AM, R15 was sitting in a chair in her room eating breakfast. R15 had 8 pills in a medication cup on her bedside table. R15 stated, Those are my morning pills. There was no nurse present in the room. On 10/21/24 at 9:13 AM, V6 (Registered Nurse) said that she administered R15's morning medications already so she does not know what medications would have been on R15's bedside table. V6 said that medications should never be left in a resident's room and the nurse should always ensure that the resident takes the medications before leaving the resident. On 10/21/24 at 9:15 AM, V6 entered R15's room. The pills that were on R15's bedside table were gone. R15 stated, I just took my morning pills that you left, you know that I don't take them until after I am done with breakfast. On 10/22/24 at 12:58 PM, V2…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-23 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure an as needed antipsychotic was limited to 14 days and failed to ensure an as needed antianxiety medication had a stop date for 1 of 5 residents (R69) reviewed for psychotropic medications in the sample of 18. The findings include: R69's Physician's Order Sheet (POS) shows an order dated 8/30/24 for: Haloperidol Lactate (antipsychotic)-Give 0.25 ml (milliliters) by mouth every two hours as needed for agitation. There is no end date documented on the POS. R69's POS shows an order dated 8/30/24 for: Lorazepam (antianxiety) 0.5 mg (milligrams)-Give one tablet by mouth every two hours as needed for shortness of breath, air hunger or anxiety. There is no end date documented on the POS. R69's POS shows an order dated 10/8/24 for: Lorazepam 2 mg/ml-Give 0.5 mg by mouth every two hours as needed for restlessness or anxiety. There is no end date documented on the POS. On 10/22/24 at 1:35 PM, V2 (Director of Nursing) said that all psychotropic medications are ordered for only 14 days. V2 said that if after the 14 days, the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident with dysphagia and nectar thickened liquids was provided supervision when drinking liquids in her room for 1 of 1 residents (R13) reviewed for safety and supervision in the sample of 19. The findings include: On 12/19/23 at 9:43 AM, R13 was sitting in a wheelchair in her room watching television. R13 had a pink liquid in a clear cup in her room sitting next to her on a stand. The pink liquid did not appear to be a nectar thick consistency. R13 was able to pick up the cup and bring it to her lips independently. R13 had a non productive cough present that sounded wet with rhonchi present and was audible without a stethoscope. On 12/19/23 at 12:21 PM, V3 CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) stated R13 is her grandmother. V3 stated R13 is on a pureed diet and thickened liquids because she has swallowing problems. R13 failed her swallow evaluation recently; they said the swallow evaluation did not go to well and they are supposed to be having a meeting about it. V3 was feeding R13 and stated R13 is…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-21 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure an indwelling catheter bag and tubing were changed as ordered and failed to ensure a catheter drainage bag was kept below the level of the bladder for 2 of 2 residents (R280 & R62) reviewed for catheters in the sample of 19. The findings include: 1. R280's computerized face sheet printed 12/20/23 showed an admission date of 12/8/23 and diagnoses including but not limited to traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage, aphasia (difficulty speaking), neurogenic bladder, and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). R280's facility assessment dated [DATE] showed no severe cognitive impairment and staff assistance required for eating, hygiene, and dressing. R280's December 2023 physician order sheet showed an order to change the catheter drainage bag at the night shift every Sunday dated 12/8/23. On 12/19/23 at 9:43 AM, R280 was seated in a wheelchair in her room with a catheter drainage bag hooked underneath and inside a dignity bag. The catheter…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 5 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure PPE (personal protective equipment) was worn in a manner to prevent cross contamination for 1 of 1 resident (R280) reviewed for infection control in the sample of 19. The findings include: On 12/19/23 and 12/20/23, R280 had a PPE bin outside her door. There was a large sign on the wall by the door that said, STOP Enhanced Barrier Precautions. The signage had illustrations to show gloves and gowns must be worn when inside the room. The sign clearly stated gowns to be worn when high-contact resident care activities were performed. The care activities included but were not limited to: urinary catheters and feeding tubes. On 12/20/23 at 12:28 PM, V10 (Licensed Practical Nurse-LPN) entered the room and flushed R280's feeding tube. V10 changed R280's catheter drainage bag and tubing. V10 donned and doffed gloves appropriately throughout the cares but did not wear a gown at any time. On 12/20/23 at 1:11 PM. V11 (Infection Control Preventionist) stated R280 is on enhanced barrier precautions. It is a type of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-19 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to stop attempts of inserting a urinary drainage tube after the resident refused it's insertion. The facility also failed to document the attempts of inserting the urinary drainage tube. This applies to one of three residents (R1) reviewed for resident rights in the sample of 8. The findings include: The facility face sheet for R1 shows diagnoses to include abscess of buttock, type 2 diabetes, obesity, depression and anxiety. The facility assessment dated [DATE] shows R1 to be cognitively intact and required assistance of one staff for activities of daily living. On 10/18/23 at 4:45 PM, R1 said she was a resident in the facility for wound care. R1 said her wound was not healing and the staff were having a hard time keeping the dressing attached to her, so a urinary drainage tube was ordered on 10/4/23. R1 said she agreed to the tube but after 3 attempts to insert were not successful, she asked the staff to stop and they did not, they kept…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-19 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to complete daily weights, failed to notify the physician of weight changes, and failed to monitor intake and output for residents with congestive heart failure for 1 of 1 residents (R5) in the sample of 18 and 1 resident (R65) outside of the sample. The findings include: 1. R65's face sheet showed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, interstitial pulmonary disease, dyspnea, heart failure, and hypertension. R65's facility assessment dated [DATE]. R65's facility assessment dated [DATE] showed R65 requires extensive assist of two staff members for most activities of daily living. R65's October 2022 physician order sheet showed an order started 4/15/22, Daily Weights: Notify NP (Nurse Practitioner) of 3# gain in 24 hours OR 5# gain in 1 week; please view under wt/vitals tab - NURSE - ENSURE THESE ARE COMPLETED AND YOU HAVE COMPARED RECENT WEIGHTS FOR PROPER…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-19 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure catheter care was provided in a manner to prevent cross-contamination for 1 of 4 residents (R56) reviewed for catheters in the sample of 18. The findings include: On 1/19/23 at 9:08 AM, V7 (Certified Nursing Assistant - CNA) performed catheter care on R56. V2 (Director or Nursing - DON) stated, I'll stay and observe the care and get an audit out of the way. R56 was lying flat in bed. V7 cleansed around R56's groin with no concerns. V7 obtained a clean washcloth to clean R56's penis and catheter tubing. V7 used the washcloth to cleanse R56's penis from the shaft toward the meatus. Then V7 cleansed R56's catheter tubing toward the meatus. The urine in R56's catheter bag was cloudy yellow with milky sediment noted. R56's Face sheet dated 1/19/23 showed diagnoses to include, but not limited to: schizophrenia, multiple sclerosis, dysphagia, cognitive communication deficit, generalized muscle weakness, seizures, and neurodysfunction of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure soiled gloves were removed when providing care to prevent cross contamination for 2 of 18 residents reviewed for infection control in the sample of 18. The findings include: 1. On 1/17/23 at 6:13 AM, V4 and V5 CNA's (Certified Nursing Assistants) approached R119 in bed. She was positioned on her left side with a wedge. V5 removed the covers and began to remove the soiled incontinence brief. After removing the brief, with gloved hands, V5 began peri care with washcloths and towels. Once she completed care, she reached into her pocket with the soiled gloves, and grabbed a roll of bags and tore one off. After opening the bag, she placed the soiled linens in the bag. V5 continued to assist with placing a clean incontinence brief on R119 and positioning her in bed. After V5 was done providing care she removed her soiled gloves. 2. On 1/17/23 at 6:21 AM R34 was lying in bed. V4 approached her and sat her up to the edge of the bed. V4 and V5 each with gloves on, assisted R34 to stand up to her walker using a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$34,753 in federal fines across 2 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

  • $14,505 — penalty dated 2025-01-15
  • $20,248 — penalty dated 2024-10-23
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-11-15 for 11 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to TUTERA SENIOR LIVING & HEALTH CARE — 25 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 3 of 52.0+1.0 vs chain
Health inspection 3 of 52.2+0.8 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 51.7+0.3 vs chain
Quality measures 2 of 53.0-1.0 vs chain
The other 24 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.0★, per CMS)
1 of 5Bethany Rehab & HccDekalb, IL 1 of 5Carlinville Rehab & HccCarlinville, IL 1 of 5Coulterville Rehab & HccCoulterville, IL 1 of 5Crystal Pines Rehab & HccCrystal Lake, IL 1 of 5Fair Oaks Rehab & HealthcareSouth Beloit, IL 1 of 5Grand Meadows Senior Living & Health CareAsbury, IA 1 of 5Hillsboro Rehab & HccHillsboro, IL 1 of 5Mattoon Rehab & HccMattoon, IL 1 of 5Metropolis Rehab & HccMetropolis, IL 1 of 5Moweaqua Rehab & HccMoweaqua, IL 1 of 5St Paul's Senior CommunityBelleville, IL 1 of 5Windsor Estates Of St CharlesSaint Charles, MO 2 of 5The Village At MissionPrairie Village, KS 2 of 5Westview Of Derby Rehabilitation & Health Care CenDerby, KS 3 of 5Carnegie Village Rehabilitation & Health Care CentBelton, MO 3 of 5Highland Rehabilitation & Health Care CenterKansas City, MO 3 of 5Lakeland Rehab & Healthcare CenterEffingham, IL 3 of 5Meridian Rehabilitation And Health Care CenterWichita, KS 3 of 5Monterey Park Rehabilitation & Health Care CenterIndependence, MO 3 of 5NorterreLiberty, MO 3 of 5Northland Rehabilitation & Health Care CenterKansas City, MO 3 of 5Stratford Commons Rehab & Health Care CenterOverland Park, KS 3 of 5Tiffany Springs Rehabilitation & Health Care CenteKansas City, MO 5 of 5Charlton Place Rehab And Healthcare CenterDeatsville, AL

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
TUTERA INVESTMENTS, LLCOrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/09/2012
JOSEPH CHARLES TUTERA 2013 FAMILY IRREVOCIABLE TRUST AGREEMENTOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 01/09/2012
MARIAN OLANDER TUTERA 2020 MRTL TROrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 12/31/2020
TUTERA, JOSEPHIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/09/2012
TUTERA, MARIANIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 01/09/2012
BLOOM, RANDALLIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/09/2012
BROOKS, KILEYIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/25/2017
WALNUT CREEK MANAGEMENT COMPANY LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/09/2012
LEBEDOWICZ, BOHDANIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/01/2025
MEEKS, BETTYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/01/2025
FLANAGAN, MICHAELIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/12/2025
TI-DIXON ILLINOIS, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/09/2012
ARNOLD, TINAIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 05/01/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 23 rows in the source record cover these 13 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$7.2M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-5.9%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.2M
Related-party expense16% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 59%Medicare 12%Other / private 29%

This home reported $1.2M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 16% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$285per resident / day
operating cost
$8,661per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$269per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IL

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Illinois Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Illinois
$8,304/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$9,216/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,219/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 145906. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-10-23, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next