Stratford Commons Rehab & Health Care Center
12340 Quivira Road, Overland Park, KS 66213 · For profit - Corporation · 60 certified beds · (913) 851-0215 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home’s record is mixed — some reassuring signs, some worth asking about.
- a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (45) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $16,149 in federal fines (most recent 2025-11-17)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (64%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 3 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 14.6% | 17.9% | 15.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 2.9% | 4.9% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.4% | 1.6% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.6% | 2.9% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 4.1% | 6.5% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.5% | 4.3% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 16.8% | 16.2% | 16.1% | typical |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 30.5% | 23.2% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 97.7% | 95.5% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 4.4% | 4.4% | 4.7% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 27.1% | 22.6% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 7.7% | 18.1% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.9% | 1.9% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 97.8% | 73.8% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 22.4% | 22.4% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 8.5% | 11.5% | 12.0% | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
50.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 133 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 48.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 66 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.61 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 88% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 30% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 50.2%CMS range 43.2–59.3 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.2%CMS range 8.2–14.8 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 48.5% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 43.9% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 51.5% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 2.7% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.4%CMS range 4.8–10.6 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.96 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 60 beds and averages 53.1 residents a day — about 88% occupied, or roughly 7 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.10 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.76 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.36 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.53 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.33 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.82 to 0.62 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 64% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
45 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 34 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-11-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 53 residents, with three residents sampled for elopement risk. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to prevent newly admitted Resident (R) 1, who had documented intermittent confusion and exit-seeking/wandering behaviors, from leaving the facility on 10/18/25 between 05:20 AM and 05:30 AM, without staff knowledge. R1 remained outside of the facility (whereabouts unknown) for approximately five and a half hours, wearing only a hospital gown and no shoes, in approximately 65 degrees Fahrenheit temperature. Law enforcement located R1 at 10:50 AM, approximately one mile from the facility, wearing a hospital gown and no shoes. The facility discovered the South egress door was not locked and did not alarm when pushed. This deficient practice placed R1 in immediate jeopardy.Findings included:- R1 admitted to the facility on [DATE].R1's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented a diagnosis of hepatic encephalopathy (a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-11-17 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 57 residents. The facility had six medication carts and two medication rooms. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to remove outdated or expired medication from potential administration to residents.Findings included:- On 09/29/25 at 07:42 AM, the Blue Medication cart contained two expired medications:Heartburn relief liquid antacid, 12 fluid ounces, with the expiration date of 10/2024. Vitamin D3, 50 micrograms (mcg), bottle of soft gels, expired April 2023.On 09/30/25 at 09:00 AM, the Blue medication room had an emergency kit box with two vials of Ativan (antianxiety drug) with an expiration date of 07/2024. On 09/29/25 at 07:45 AM, Certified Medication Aide (CMA) S verified the expiration dates on the medications. On 09/30/25 at 09:00 AM, Administrative Nurse F verified the expiration dates on the two vials of Ativan. On 09/30/25 at 09:22 AM, Administrative Nurse D verified the pharmacist should have removed the expired vials of Ativan medication from service. She verified staff should have removed the non-narcotic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 57 residents. The facility identified 15 residents on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP- infection control interventions designed to reduce transmission of resistant organisms, which employ targeted gown and glove use during high contact care). Based on record review, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to follow sanitary infection control practices related to wearing personal protective equipment (PPE) related to residents on EBP.Findings Included: - On 09/30/25 at 07:36 AM, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) M and CNA N used a total lift to transfer Resident (R) 23, who had wounds and a urinary catheter, from his bed to a wheelchair. The CNAs did not wear gowns for infection control during the transfer. On 09/30/25 at 07:45 AM, Licensed Nurse (LN) G verified staff should have worn gowns when transferring R23, as his physician ordered on 09/26/25. On 09/30/25 at 02:32 PM, Administrative Nurse E verified that staff should have worn gowns during the transfer. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-17 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility reported a census of 57 residents. The sample included 15 residents reviewed for dignity. Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a dignified care environment for Resident (R) 8 when staff spoke to her in a disrespectful manner when the resident asked for assistanceFindings Included:- R8's Electronic Medical Records (EMR) included diagnoses of depression, anxiety disorder (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty, and irrational fear), cognitive communication disorder (an impairment in organization, sequencing, attention, memory, planning, problem-solving, and safety awareness), muscle weakness, and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). R8's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) completed 07/31/25 indicated a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12, indicating mild cognitive impairment. The MDS noted upper extremity impairment on one side. The MDS noted she required substantial to maximal assistance for transfers, bathing, dressing, toileting, bed mobility, personal hygiene, and putting on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-17 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 57 residents. The sample included 15, with one reviewed for advance directives. Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to follow Resident (R) 59's chosen advanced directives (legal document in which a person specifies what actions should be taken for their health if they are no longer able to make decisions for themselves) related to her do not resuscitate (DNR) wishes for cardio pulmonary resuscitation (CPR- an emergency lifesaving procedure performed when the heart stops beating). Findings Included:- R59's Electronic Medical Records (EMR) included diagnoses of muscle weakness, atrial fibrillation (rapid, irregular heartbeat), cognitive communication disorder (an impairment in organization, sequencing, attention, memory, planning, problem-solving, and safety awareness), heart failure, and peripheral vascular disease (PVD- slow and progressive circulation disorder causing narrowing, blockage, or spasms in a blood vessel). R59's admission…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-17 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolatedPrevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 57 residents. The sample included 15 residents, with five reviewed for unnecessary drugs. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 6 was free from antipsychotic (a class of medications used to treat major mental conditions that cause a break from reality) medication use without a proper indication for use written by the physician. Findings included: - R6's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of neurocognitive disorder with Lewy bodies (a type of progressive brain disorder that leads to a decline in thinking, reasoning, and independent function) and a cognitive communication deficit (an impairment in organization, sequencing, attention, memory, planning, problem-solving, and safety awareness).R6's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of seven, indicating severely impaired cognition. The MDS documented R6 required maximum or full staff assistance…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-17 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 57 residents. The sample included 15 residents, with six residents reviewed for pressure ulcers (PU- localized injury to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence, as a result of pressure, or pressure in combination with shear and/or friction). Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to thoroughly assess Resident (R) 41's Stage three PU (full-thickness pressure injury extending through the skin into the tissue below) and Stage four PU (a deep pressure wound that reaches the muscles, ligaments, or even bone).Findings included: - R41's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented a diagnosis of osteomyelitis (infection of the bone and bone marrow) of the sacrococcygeal region (area at the very base of the spine), encompassing the sacrum (a triangular bone) and the coccyx (the tailbone).R41's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], was in progress. R41's Care Plan dated 09/19/25 documented R41 had an actual pressure injury to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility reported a census of 57 residents. The Sample included 15, with three reviewed for falls. Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to implement Resident (R) 8's fall interventions related to fall prevention signs.Findings Included:- R8's Electronic Medical Records (EMR) included diagnoses of depression (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest), anxiety disorder (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty, and irrational fear), cognitive communication disorder (an impairment in organization, sequencing, attention, memory, planning, problem-solving, and safety awareness), muscle weakness, and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). R8's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) completed 07/31/25 indicated a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12, indicating mild cognitive impairment. The MDS noted upper extremity impairment on one side. The MDS noted she required substantial to maximal assistance for transfers, bathing, dressing, toileting, bed mobility, personal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-17 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 57 residents. The sample included 15 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 3 received care and services for dialysis (a procedure where impurities or wastes were removed from the blood) consistent with professional standards of practice, which include ongoing communication and collaboration with the dialysis facility. Findings included:- R3's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) included diagnoses of acute osteomyelitis (local or generalized infection of the bone and bone marrow) of the left foot and ankle, sepsis (a life-threatening systemic reaction that develops due to infections that cause inflammation throughout the entire body), non-pressure chronic ulcer, diabetes mellitus (DM- when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin is made, or the body cannot respond to the insulin), end-stage renal disease, anemia (an inadequate number of healthy red blood cells to carry adequate oxygen to body tissues), peripheral…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-02-08 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespreadConduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 54 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to conduct a thorough, updated facility-wide assessment to determine what resources were necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations and emergencies. This failure affected all 54 residents residing in the facility. Findings included: - A review of the Facility Assessment dated 06/07/23 provided by the facility revealed the assessment listed the number and types of admissions for the past year to date. The assessment sections were not completed in the sections that documented the staffing level, competencies required, equipment, and physical or environmental needs to address the facility's specific resident population and acuity. On 02/08/24 at 02:37 PM Administrative Staff A stated he was not aware the assessment of the facility did not meet the requirements needed to determine the staff and other critical elements necessary for the care of the residents that resided in the facility. On 02/08/24 at 02:54 PM Administrative Staff…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-02-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 54 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure proper infection control standards were followed related to the implementation of procedures to monitor and prevent Legionella disease (Legionella is a bacterium that can cause pneumonia in vulnerable populations) or other opportunistic waterborne pathogens and failed to ensure sanitary storage of respiratory equipment. These deficient practices placed the residents at risk for complications related to infectious diseases. Findings included: - Observation on 02/07/24 at 08:33 AM Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) N pushed R29 in the wheelchair into R29's room and stepped onto the nasal cannula on the floor as she pulled the bedding down on R29's bed. CNA N moved the nasal cannula from the floor and placed the cannula onto the oxygen concentrator. CNA N removed the oxygen tubing connected to the portable oxygen tank from R29's nose and placed the oxygen tubing in a plastic bag that was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 34 citations
- Potential for harm · E2024-02-08 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — patternEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 54 residents. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Licensed Nurse (LN) staff possessed the required skills and competencies to administer medication intravenously (IV- administered through a vein directly into the bloodstream). This placed all residents with IV medications at risk for medication errors and adverse outcomes. (Refer to F760) Findings included: - An SBAR Communication Form and progress note -V 2 under the Assessments tab in R47's EMR recorded in the Situation section, documented the wrong IV antibiotic was administered on 12/13/24. The form was signed by Administrative Nurse F on 12/15/24. The facility's report #74 Med Error, dated 12/13/23, documented the wrong IV antibiotic medication was administered to R47. The document further recorded R47 received Unasyn (antibiotic) instead of the ordered Rocephin. The document recorded that the IV medication was stopped, R47's provider was notified and R47 went to the hospital. The report documented None to the predisposing environment, physiological and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-08 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 54 residents. The sample included 14 residents with 14 residents reviewed for care plans. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to revise the care plan with the relevant hospice information for Resident (R) 29. The facility also failed to revise R10's care plan with the unsuccessful attempts for nonpharmacological interventions that had been tried prior to the administration of as-needed psychotropic (alters mood or thoughts) medication. This deficient practice placed these residents at risk for impaired care due to uncommunicated care needs. Findings included: - R29's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnoses tab documented diagnoses of weakness, need for assistance with personal care, chronic respiratory failure, emphysema (a long-term, progressive disease of the lungs characterized by shortness of breath), muscle weakness, lack of coordination, and difficulty in walking. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-08 · tag F0661 — isolatedEnsure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified as census of 54 residents. The sample included 14 residents with two residents reviewed for discharge. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 24's discharge summary included medication reconciliation and instructions. This placed R24 at risk for not receiving timely and appropriate care. Findings included: - The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for R24 documented diagnoses of atrial fibrillation (A-fib: a rapid, irregular heartbeat), hypertension (HTN- an elevated blood pressure), syncope (fainting or passing out), and transient ischemic attack (TIA- temporary episode of inadequate blood supply to the brain). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented R24 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12 which indicated moderate cognitive impairment. The Functional Care Area Assessment (CAA) dated 01/25/24 for R24 documented she was receiving skilled services and was seen by therapy with the goal of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-08 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolatedEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 54 residents. The sample included 14 residents with one sampled for activities of daily living (ADL). Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 32 received supportive care and services to promote and maintain his quality of life when the facility did not implement tools and/or strategies to allow R32, who had aphasia (a condition with disordered or absent language function), to communicate his wants, needs, or feelings. This deficient practice placed the resident at risk for decreased quality of life, isolation, and impaired dignity. Findings included: - R32's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnoses tab documented cerebral infarction (stroke - the sudden death of brain cells due to lack of oxygen caused by impaired blood flow to the brain by blockage or rupture of an artery to the brain), aphasia following cerebral infraction, hemiparesis/hemiplegia (weakness and paralysis on one side of the body) following…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-08 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 54 residents. The sample included 14 residents with five residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs). Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to provide ADL care including trimming his fingernails/toenails for Resident (R) 5. The facility also failed to provide ADL care and assistance to R9. This deficient practice placed the residents at risk for poor hygiene, decreased self-esteem, and impaired health. Findings included: - The Diagnoses tab of R5's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP - a neurological disorder that involves progressive weakness and reduced senses in the arms and legs), paraplegia (paralysis characterized by motor or sensory loss in the lower limbs and trunk), generalized muscle weakness, and cognitive communication deficit (an impairment in organization, sequencing, attention, memory, planning, problem-solving, and safety awareness). The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-08 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 54 residents. The sample included 14 residents with 14 residents reviewed for quality of care. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to apply Geri Sleeves (sleeves used to protect the skin on the arms and legs against damage caused by friction and shearing) to Resident (R) 23 per her care plan and the facility failed to follow physician ordered daily weights for R10 who required the use of a diuretic (a medication used for the formation and secretion of urine and reduce excess fluids). This deficient practice placed R23 at risk for skin injury and placed R10 at risk for excess fluid accumulation and physical complications. Findings included: - R23's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented a diagnosis of dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, and confusion), and cognitive communication deficit (an impairment in organization, sequencing, attention, memory, planning, problem-solving, and safety awareness). The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-08 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 54 residents. The sample included 14 residents with two sampled for pressure ulcers (localized injury to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence, as a result of pressure, or pressure in combination with shear and/or friction). based on observation, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to ensure staff implemented the care plan interventions for Resident (R) 9 who had multiple pressure-related injuries and remained at risk for the development of pressure ulcers. This deficient practice placed R9 at risk for delayed healing, new pressure injuries, and related complications. Findings included: - R9's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of chronic osteomyelitis (local or generalized infection of the bone and bone marrow) of the left tibia (bone of the lower leg )and fibula (one of the two bones of the lower leg), repeated falls, symptoms and signs involving cognitive functions and awareness, acquired absence of the right toe,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-08 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 54 residents. The sample included 14 residents with three reviewed for range of motion. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 5 received services/interventions to prevent a reduction of range of motion (ROM) and contractures (abnormal permanent fixation of a joint or muscle). This deficient practice left R5 at risk for further decline and decreased ROM or mobility. Findings included: - The Diagnoses tab of R5's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP - a neurological disorder that involves progressive weakness and reduced senses in the arms and legs), paraplegia (paralysis characterized by motor or sensory loss in the lower limbs and trunk), generalized muscle weakness, and cognitive communication deficit (an impairment in organization, sequencing, attention, memory, planning, problem-solving, and safety awareness). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated 08/15/23, documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 54 residents. The sample included 14 residents with three residents reviewed for accidents. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure staff followed the care plan for safe transfers for Resident (R) 29 and the facility also failed to ensure staff placed a fall mat next to R9's bed per his plan of care. These deficient practices placed these residents at risk for falls and possible injuries related to falls. Findings included: - R29's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnoses tab documented diagnoses of weakness, need for assistance with personal care, chronic respiratory failure, emphysema (a long-term, progressive disease of the lungs characterized by shortness of breath), muscle weakness, lack of coordination, and difficulty in walking. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11 which indicated moderately impaired cognition. The MDS documented R29 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-08 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 54 residents. The sample included 14 residents with two residents reviewed for respiratory care. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure there was a physician indication for oxygen administration for Resident (R)29 and failed to ensure the oxygen tubing was stored in a sanitary manner to decrease exposure and contamination. This placed R29 at increased risk for respiratory infection and complications. Findings included: - R29's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnoses tab documented diagnoses of weakness, need for assistance with personal care, chronic respiratory failure, emphysema (a long-term, progressive disease of the lungs characterized by shortness of breath), muscle weakness, lack of coordination, and difficulty in walking. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11 which indicated moderately impaired cognition. The MDS documented R29 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-08 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 54 residents. The sample included 14 residents with two residents reviewed for dialysis (a procedure where impurities or wastes were removed from the blood). Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to obtain Resident (R) 102's weight before hemodialysis (a machine filters wastes, salts, and fluid from your blood when your kidneys are no longer healthy enough to do this work adequately) treatment. This placed R102 at risk for complications related to dialysis. Findings included: - The electronic medical record (EMR) for R102 documented diagnosis of end-stage renal disease (ESRD-a terminal disease of the kidneys) and dependence on renal dialysis. R102's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated 12/21/23 documented a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 which indicated intact cognition. The MDS documented R102 was on dialysis at the time of admission. R102's Urinary Incontinence and Indwelling Catheter Care Area Assessment (CAA) dated 12/27/23 documented she was skilled and was seen by therapy with the goal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-08 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 54 residents. The sample included 14 residents with five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure nonpharmacological attempts of symptom management prior to administering as-needed psychotropic (alters mood or thought) medication for Resident (R) 10. The facility also failed to ensure a duration for an as-needed psychotropic medication for R101. These deficient practices placed these residents at risk for unnecessary psychotropic medication and related complications. Findings included: - R10's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnoses tab documented diagnoses of anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty, and irrational fear) disorder, edema (swelling resulting from an excessive accumulation of fluid in the body tissues), and insomnia (inability to sleep). The Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-08 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 54 residents. The sample included 14 residents with two reviewed for discharge. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to prevent a significant medication error when Resident (R) 47 received an incorrect antibiotic (medication used to treat bacterial infections) intravenously (IV-administered via the vein directly into the bloodstream). This placed the resident at risk for adverse drug effects and ineffective antibiotic therapy. Findings included: - R47's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of cognitive communication deficit (an impairment in organization, sequencing, attention, memory, planning, problem-solving, and safety awareness), fracture of the skull and facial bones, compression of the brain, and generalized muscle weakness. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated 11/05/23 documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11 which indicated moderate cognitive impairment. The MDS documented R47 used a walker and was independent for personal hygiene. R47 required substantial…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-08 · tag F0849 — isolatedArrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 54 residents. The sample included 14 residents with two residents reviewed for hospice services. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a communication process was implemented, which included how the communication would be documented between the facility and the hospice provider, and a failed to provide a description of the services, medication, and equipment provided to Resident (R) 29 by hospice. This deficient practice created a risk for missed or delayed services and impaired physical, and psychosocial care for R29. Findings included: - R29's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnoses tab documented diagnoses of weakness, need for assistance with personal care, chronic respiratory failure, emphysema (a long-term, progressive disease of the lungs characterized by shortness of breath), muscle weakness, lack of coordination, and difficulty in walking. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented a Brief…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-08 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 54 residents. The sample included 14 residents with five reviewed for immunization status. Based on record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to provide Resident (R)39 with the pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV20- vaccination for bacterial lung infections) as consented. This placed R39 at increased risk for complications related to pneumonia ( bacterial infection in the lungs). Findings included: R39's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed he was eligible and within the required vaccination date range to receive the PCV20 vaccination. R39's EMR under the Misc tab revealed he gave verbal consent on a Pneumococcal Vaccination form to receive the PCV20 vaccination on 10/11/23. The form indicated R39 was provided educational information related to the vaccination but never received the PCV20 vaccination. The facility was unable to provide evidence the PCV20 was administered to R39 upon request. On 02/05/24 at 07:25 AM Administrator Staff A stated Administrative Nurse E was responsible for tracking resident vaccinations. On 02/08/24 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2022-07-28 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — widespreadImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility reported a census of 55 residents. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure principles of antibiotic stewardship were followed to ensure antibiotics were used in a safe and effective manner to prevent unnecessary side effects of antibiotics and antibiotic resistance in an ongoing, proactive manner. Findings included: - Review of the Infection Control Log for tracking and trending infections from January 2022 through June 2022, revealed the following: January, February and March logs lacked documentation of organism identifications for monitoring trends in infection. The May 2022 log was not done/unavailable for review. The Infection Preventionist (IP) was not available to interview. On 07/28/22 at 06:37 PM Administrative Nurse D stated she had reviewed the monthly infection surveillance book and had noted the lack of organism tracking and facility trending. The facility policy Infection Prevention and Control Program Manual Antibiotic Stewardship and MDROs dated 2019 documented tracking and reporting of antibiotics use and outcomes will be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-07-28 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 55 residents. The sample included 16 residents with five residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL's). Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to provide consistent bathing opportunities for resident (R)27, R34, R16, R18, and R31. This deficient practice placed the residents at risk for decreased psychosocial wellbeing and increased skin complications. Findings Included: - The Medical Diagnosis section within R27's Electronic Medical Records (EMR) included diagnoses of muscle weakness, retention of urine (lack of ability to urinate and empty the bladder), dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion), major depressive disorder (major mood disorder), osteoporosis (abnormal loss of bone density and deterioration of bone tissue with an increased fracture risk), chronic kidney disease, and cognitive communication deficit. R27's Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated 06/16/22 noted a Brief…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-07-28 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 55 residents and one facility kitchen. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to maintain sanitary dining services related to food preparation, equipment cleaning and food storage during service. This deficient practice placed the residents at increased risk related to food borne illnesses and food safety concerns. Findings Included: - On 07/26/22 at 07:25 AM an initial kitchen walk-through revealed two staff members prepping food in the kitchen area were not wearing hairnets while working with food during the prepping of breakfast. At 07:26 AM Dietary Staff CC stated that the kitchen did not have any hairnets available at that time. An inspection of the dry food storage area revealed opened containers of pancake syrup, Worcestershire sauce, and peanut butter with no opened dates labeled. An inspection of the dry food mixer revealed dried food residue on the base of the mixer around the buttons. An inspection of the walk-in refrigerator unit revealed heavy dust and debris buildup of the air-conditioning units…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-07-28 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — patternSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 55 residents. Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to maintain an effective quality assessment and assurance (QAA) program to identify quality issues and develop performance improvement plans. This deficient practice placed the resident's at risk for ineffective care. Findings Included: - The facility failed to ensure residents were provided Notice of Medicare Non-coverage (NOMNC) notices. (Refer to F582) The facility failed to ensure bathing and personal hygiene was provided for residents who required assistance from staff to complete the care. (Refer to F677) The facility failed to implement a physician order for daily weights to monitor for excess weight/fluid retention and failed to implement adequate blood glucose monitoring. (Refer to F684) The facility failed to provide a toileting program to reduce or prevent bladder incontinence. The facility failed to provide consistent catheter (tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine) care of indwelling catheters. (Refer to F690) The facility failed to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-07-28 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 55 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure that proper hand hygiene was followed during peri-care for Resident (R) 21 and failed to ensure sanitary handling of a sling and disinfection of the Hoyer Lift (total body mechanical lift used to transfer residents) after use for R96. The facility failed to ensure sanitary storage of clean linens. These deficient practices put facility residents at risk for the spread of infections and/or communicable diseases. Findings Included: - On 07/26/22 at 08:00 AM an inspection of the Blue Hallway linen closet revealed clean towels, hospital gowns, sheets, rags, and Hoyer Lift slings stored on a metal rack. The clean linen shared a room with a sink, specimen refrigerator and trash can. No cover was observed over the clean linen rack. An inspection of the Green Hallway linen closet revealed clean towels, hospital gowns, sheets, rags, and Hoyer Lift slings stored on a metal rack. The Hoyer…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-07-28 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 55 residents. The sample included 16 residents with five reviewed for vaccination status. Based on record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to obtain influenza (highly contagious viral infection that attacks the lungs, nose, and throat and can be deadly in high-risk groups) vaccination and pneumococcal (pneumonia infection that inflames air sacs in one or both lungs which may fill with fluid) vaccination consents, declinations or administration information for Resident (R) 37, R10, and R35, and R18. This placed the residents at increased risk for influenza, pneumonia, and related complications. Findings included: - Review of R37's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed the Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] recorded R37 received an influenza vaccination and was offered and declined a pneumococcal vaccine. R37's clinical recorded lacked evidence of an informed declination for pneumococcal. The facility provided a signed declination for the pneumococcal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-07-28 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 55 residents with 16 residents included in the sample and three residents reviewed for beneficiary notification. Based on interview and record review the facility failed to issue CMS (Center for Medicare/Medicaid Services) Notification of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC- the form used to notify Medicare A participants of their rights to appeal and the last covered date of service). The facility failed to complete the NOMNC for Resident (R)150. This placed the resident at risk for being uninformed of his rights for appeal and potential for financial liability related to the end of the Medicare Part A episode. Findings included: - Review of R150's electronic medical record (EMR) documented the Medicare Part A episode began on 06/10/22 and ended on 06/24/22. R150 discharged from the facility on 06/25/22. The facility lacked documentation that staff issued the NOMNC to the resident or resident's Durable Power of Attorney (DPOA). The medical record lacked documentation of notification of the resident's right to appeal the decision of Medicare non-coverage…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-07-28 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 55 residents. The sample included 16 residents with two residents reviewed for quality of care. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to provide diabetic (when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin made or the body cannot respond to the insulin) monitoring for Resident (R)95 who required an acute hospitalization for dangerously low blood glucose levels. The facility also failed to complete daily weights on R37 for her congestive heart failure (CHF- a condition with low heart output and the body becomes congested with fluid). This deficient practice placed R37 at risk for complications related to her CHF. Findings Included: - The Medical Diagnosis section within R95's Electronic Medical Records (EMR) included diagnoses of type two diabetes mellitus (when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin made or the body cannot respond to the insulin), muscle weakness, hypertension (high blood pressure), cognitive communication deficit,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-07-28 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 55 residents. The sample included 16 residents with one reviewed for accidents. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure staff followed Resident (R) 18's plan of care which directed R18 required assistance of one staff with the use of a transfer belt for transfers. This placed R18, who had a history of falls, at increased risk for accidents and related injuries. Findings included: - R18's Electronic Medical Record (EMR), under the Diagnoses' tab, recorded diagnoses of dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion), depression (abnormal emotional state characterized by exaggerated feelings of sadness, worthlessness and emptiness), history of falling, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD- progressive and irreversible condition characterized by diminished lung capacity and difficulty or discomfort in breathing), and abnormalities of gait and mobility. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-07-28 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 55 residents. The sample included 16 residents with four reviewed for bowel and bladder management and two reviewed for urinary catheter (insertion of a catheter into the bladder to drain the urine into a collection bag) care. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to store Resident (R)11's urinary catheter in a sanitary manner to promoted dependent drainage without backflow. The facility additionally failed to provide R45 with a toileting program to prevent or reduce incontinence of bladder This deficient practice placed the residents at risk for complication related to urinary tract infections (UTI) and increased risk for incontinence. Findings Included: - The Medical Diagnosis section within R11's Electronic Medical Records (EMR) included diagnoses of hydronephrosis (excess urine accumulation in kidney(s) that causes swelling of kidneys), chronic kidney disease, benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH- non-cancerous enlargement of the prostate…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-07-28 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 55 residents. The sample included 16 residents with one resident reviewed for hydration. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to provide consistent intravenous (IV - giving directly through the veins access) fluid therapy as ordered by the physician for Resident (R)11. This deficient practice placed the resident at risk for complication related to dehydration and related complications. Findings Included: -The Medical Diagnosis section within R11's Electronic Medical Records (EMR) included diagnoses of hydronephrosis ( excess urine accumulation in kidney(s) that causes swelling of kidneys), chronic kidney disease, benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH- non-cancerous enlargement of the prostate which can lead to interference with urine flow, urinary frequency and urinary tract infections), retention of urine (lack of ability to urinate and empty the bladder), neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder (bladder- dysfunction of the urinary bladder caused by a lesion of the nervous system), and dementia (progressive mental…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-07-28 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 55 residents. The sample included 16 residents. Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure that Resident (R) 21's abdominal binder was applied as directed to avoid possible dislodging of his percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG-tube placed through abdomen into stomach to allow liquid nutrition) feeding tube. The facility further failed to ensure sanitary care was provided for R31's gravity bag and tubing used to administer enteral (provided directly to the digestive system through an alternative opening such as a feeding tube) nutrition and failed to assess residual as ordered by the physician. This placed the residents at increased risks for complications related to enteral feedings. Findings Included: - The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for R21 documented diagnoses of cerebral infarction (stroke- occurs as a result of disrupted blood flow to the brain due to problems with the blood vessels that supply it) , hemiplegia and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-07-28 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 55 residents and identified one resident was positive for Covid (highly contagious, potentially life-threatening respiratory infection). The sample included 16 residents with two reviewed for respiratory services. Based on observation, record review and interviews, staff failed to ensure Resident (R)18's nebulizer tubing was stored in a sanitary manner to decrease exposure and contamination. This placed R18 at increased risk for respiratory infection and complications. Findings included: - R18's Electronic Medical Record (EMR), under the Diagnoses tab, recorded diagnoses of dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion), depression (abnormal emotional state characterized by exaggerated feelings of sadness, worthlessness and emptiness), history of falling, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD- progressive and irreversible condition characterized by diminished lung capacity and difficulty or discomfort…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-07-28 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 55 residents. The sample included 16 residents with two reviewed for dialysis (blood purifying treatment given when kidney function is not optimum). Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to obtain communication from the dialysis center regarding Resident (R) 16's and R146 health status with each procedure. The facility further failed to measure weights daily as ordered for R16 and R146, and obtain weekly labs for R16. This deficient practice placed R16 and R146 at risk for complication related to dialysis. Findings Included: - R16's Electronic Medical Record (EMR), under the Diagnoses tab recorded diagnoses of a right femur (thigh bone) fracture, end stage renal (kidney) disease, dependence on dialysis, Parkinson's disease (slowly progressive neurologic disorder characterized by resting tremor, rolling of the fingers, masklike faces, shuffling gait, muscle rigidity and weakness), and pain. R16's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] recorded a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-07-28 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolatedProvide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 55 residents. The sample included 16 residents with two residents reviewed for dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion). Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to provide dementia care and services to support Resident (R)18's highest practicable level of well-being. This deficient practice placed R18 at risk for decreased quality of life and impaired well-being due related to dementia. Findings included: - R18's Electronic Medical Record (EMR), under the Diagnoses tab, recorded diagnoses of dementia, depression (abnormal emotional state characterized by exaggerated feelings of sadness, worthlessness and emptiness), history of falling, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD- progressive and irreversible condition characterized by diminished lung capacity and difficulty or discomfort in breathing), and abnormalities of gait and mobility. The admission Minimum Data…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-07-28 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 55 residents. The sample included 16 residents with five residents reviewed for medication regimen review. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the Consulting Pharmacist (CP) identified and reported irregularities found with Resident (R)10's insulin (hormone used to treat/control blood glucose levels) administration and further failed to identify and report inappropriate diagnoses for antipsychotic (class of medications used to treat psychosis [any major mental disorder characterized by a gross impairment in reality testing]and other mental emotional conditions) medication use for R18 and R37. This placed the affected residents at risk for unecessary medication treatment and related side effects. Findings Included: -The Medical Diagnosis section within R10's Electronic Medical Records (EMR) included diagnoses of type two diabetes mellitus (when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin made or the body cannot respond to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-07-28 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 55 residents. The sample included 16 residents with five residents reviewed for unnecessary medication. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to provide adequate monitor blood glucose (sugar) levels administer physician ordered insulin (medication used to control blood glucose levels) for Resident (R)10 and R37. This deficient practice placed the residents at risk for abnormal blood glucose levels and related complications. Findings Included: -The Medical Diagnosis section within R10's Electronic Medical Records (EMR) included diagnoses of type two diabetes mellitus (when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin made or the body cannot respond to the insulin), cerebral infarction (sudden death of brain cells due to lack of oxygen caused by impaired blood flow to the brain by blockage or rupture of an artery to the brain), mild cognitive impairment, abnormal gait and mobility, and history of diabetic ketoacidosis (medical emergency were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-07-28 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 55 residents. The sample included 16 residents with five residents sampled for unnecessary medication review. Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that Resident (R)37 and R18 had an appropriate diagnosis for their antipsychotic (a class of medications used to treat psychosis and other mental emotional conditions) medications: Abilify and Seroquel. This place R37 and R18 at risk for unnecessary antipsychotic medication administration and related side effects. Findings included: - The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for R37 documented diagnoses of type two diabetes mellitus (DM- when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin made or the body cannot respond to the insulin), dementia without behavioral disturbance (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion), hypertension (HTN-elevated blood pressure), retention of urine (lack of ability to urinate and empty the bladder), persistent mood disorder…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-07-28 · tag F0807 — failed to offer suitable drinks — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides drinks consistent with resident needs and preferences and sufficient to maintain resident hydration.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 55 residents. The sample included 16 residents with two residents reviewed for hydration. Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to respond to and provide Resident (R)18, who required thickened liquids, with her requested drinks during meal service. This deficient practice placed R18 at increased risk for dehydration and impaired comfort. Findings Included: - R18's Electronic Medical Record (EMR), under the Diagnoses tab, recorded diagnoses of dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion), depression (abnormal emotional state characterized by exaggerated feelings of sadness, worthlessness and emptiness), history of falling, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD- progressive and irreversible condition characterized by diminished lung capacity and difficulty or discomfort in breathing), and abnormalities of gait and mobility. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$16,149 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $16,149 — penalty dated 2025-11-17
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to TUTERA SENIOR LIVING & HEALTH CARE — 25 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 3 of 5 | 2.0 | +1.0 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 3 of 5 | 2.2 | +0.8 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 1.7 | +0.3 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 3.0 | +1.0 vs chain |
The other 24 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.0★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JOSEPH CHARLES TUTERA 2013 FAMILY IRREVOCIABLE TRUST AGREEMENT | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 10% | since 06/11/2013 |
| CUNNINGHAM, MARY | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 06/11/2013 |
| MENDOLIA, CONSTANCE | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 06/11/2013 |
| FLANAGAN, MICHAEL | Individual | CONTRACTED MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 06/11/2013 |
| BROOKS, KILEY | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 06/11/2013 |
| TUTERA, JOSEPH | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 06/11/2013 |
| TUTERA INVESTMENTS, LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 06/11/2013 |
| BLOOM, RANDALL | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 06/11/2013 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 9 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $893K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 12% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in KS
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Kansas Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 175549. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-11-17, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.