Monterey Park Rehabilitation & Health Care Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

50.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 139 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 46.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 28 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.30 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 48% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 16% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 122 beds and averages 91.8 residents a day — about 75% occupied, or roughly 30 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.71 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.33 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.20 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.24 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.90 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.33 to 0.33 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 55% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

25 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 15 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-11-18 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the staff member working in the kitchen failed to wash their hands, providing a risk of cross contamination between objects and food. This practice potentially affected all residents who ate the food from the kitchen. The facility census was 98 residents.Review of the facility's undated Handwashing Policy and Procedure showed:-Hand washing was the most important component for preventing the spread of infection. Proper hand washing technique was to be used at all times that hand washing is indicated.-Hand washing was to be done:--When hands were visibly soiled.--Before and after eating or handling food.--After toileting or after personal grooming (combing hair).--Before starting work.--After smoking.--After coughing, sneezing, or blowing your nose.--After handling uncooked animal products such as raw meat, or fish.1. Observation on 9/25/25 from 9:30 A.M. to 12:00 P.M. during the lunch meal preparation showed:-Dietary [NAME] A grabbed the ready to eat pies in a way that his/her ungloved hand full length of his/her thumbs were…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-18 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify a resident's emergency contact in a timely manner for one sampled resident (Resident #54) when on 9/11/25 at 8:10 A.M., he/she had weakened knees that buckled resulting in staff lowering him/her to ground. out 21 sampled residents. The facility resident census of 98 residents. A policy related to Notification of Change was requested not received at time of exit. 1. Review of Resident #54's admission Record form showed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of:-History of falls. -Cerebral Infraction (stroke happens when there is a loss of blood flow to part of the brain). -Cognitive Communication Deficit (condition where a person has difficulty with communication because of a disruption in brain function that affects thinking abilities). -The resident was his/her own person, and a family member was his/her first emergency contact. Review of the resident's Health Status Note dated 9/11/25 at 8:10 A.M, showed:-This nurse was notified by…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-18 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain one mechanical lift in resident room [ROOM NUMBER], free from a buildup of grime and particles. This practice affected one resident who was dependent on the use of a mechanical lift. The facility census was 98 residents.Review of the facility's Undated guidelines for inspecting the mechanical lifts, entitled Inspecting Mobile lifts, showed: -Inspect all surfaces on lifts to ensure they are in good repair.-Clean as necessary and notify housekeeping.-Check battery if applicable.-Inspect the control panel.-Inspect the electrical cords.1. Observations on 9/23/25 at 11:52 A.M. and on 9/25/25 at 12:58 P.M., showed a buildup of grime on the base of the mechanical lift in the resident's room. During an interview on 9/25/25 at 12:53 P.M., Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) A said the mechanical lift should be cleaned every shift and the facility staff who used the mechanical lift should clean the lift more often. During an interview on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-11-18 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
  Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the call light was within reach for one sampled resident (Resident #18) out of 21 sampled residents. The facility census was 98 residents. A call light policy was requested and not provided at the time of exit. 1. Review of Resident #18's Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS-a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff for care planning) dated 7/30/25 showed:-The resident was moderately cognitively impaired. -Required staff assistance with his/her activities of daily living. Review of the resident's care plan dated 9/24/25 showed:-The resident was at risk for falls related to unsteady gait and cognitive impairment with poor safety awareness.-The resident had limited physical mobility.-The resident would have interventions in place to reduce the risk for falls and/or injury r/t falls through the next review period that included:--Display a Call Don't Fall sign.--Educate resident to ask staff for assistance.--Educate resident to use the call light to ask for assistance.--Be…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-11-18 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure infection control practices for proper placement of indwelling Foley catheter (a urinary bladder catheter inserted through urethra) tubing from dragging or touch the ground, for one sampled resident (Resident #10) who's at risk for Urinary Tack Infections (UTI - an infection of one or more structures in the urinary system) out of 21 sampled residents. The facility census was 98 residents. Review of the facility Indwelling Foley Catheter Care policy dated 12/2024 showed: -Ensure resident to keep the catheter and tubing free of kinks. -Check drainage tubing and bag to ensure that the catheter is draining properly. 1. Review of Resident #10 admission Record showed the resident admitted to the facility with a diagnosis of obstructive and reflux uropathy (is kidney scarring caused by urine flowing backward from the bladder into a ureter and toward a kidney).Review of the resident's Catheter Care Plan dated 5/6/25 showed:-The resident required a foley catheter due to diagnosis of obstructive and reflux…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-21 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that one sampled resident (Resident #1) out of four sampled residents received medications as prescribed by the physician. On 7/9/25 Certified Medication Technician (CMT) A failed to verify the identity of the residents prior to administering medication and failed to update the resident's bed location in the electronic medication administration (eMAR) system, resulting in Resident #1 receiving Resident #2's medications. The facility census was 95 residents.On 7/21/25 the facility Administration was notified of the past noncompliance which occurred on 7/9/25. Facility staff had subsequently been educated on all facility medication administration policies. All resident bed assignments were audited. The deficiency was corrected on 7/10/25. Review of the facility's Medication Pass Tips policy dated 5/19 showed:-The five rights: right drug; right time; right resident; right dose; right route.-Prior to preparing medication, verify the resident's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-09 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all residents were treated in a dignified manner when one staff member (Dietary Manager) spoke in a harsh tone and showed aggression to one sampled resident (Resident #2). The facility census was 97 residents. On 7/9/25 the facility Administration was notified of the past noncompliance which occurred on 6/18/25. Facility staff had subsequently been educated on all facility medication administration policies. All resident bed assignments were audited. The deficiency was corrected on 7/7/25. A facility policy for dignity and respect was requested but not provided.1. Review of Resident #2's admission Record, showed:-The resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE].-The resident had a diagnosis of need for assistance with personal cares.-The resident had a diagnosis of dysphagia (difficulty in swallowing).-The resident had a diagnosis of cognitive communication deficit (a person has difficulty communicating because of injury to the brain that…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-04 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from significant medication errors when staff administered the wrong medications to one sampled resident (Resident #1) out of six sampled residents. The facility census was 95 residents. On 2/4/25 the Administrator and acting Director of Nursing (DON) were notified of past non-compliance which occurred on 1/31/25. On 1/31/25 the facility Administrator was notified of the incident and the investigation was started. Certified Medication Technician (CMT) A notified Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) A of an medication error he/she had made. CMT A and all nursing staff were educated on medication administration on 1/31/25. The deficiency was corrected on 1/31/25. Review of the facility Medication Pass Tips dated 5/2019 showed: -The following is a compilation of points to keep in mind during medication pass. -Prior to preparing medications, verify the resident's identity. -A photo is available on the electronic Medication Administration Record (eMAR). -Another staff member who is familiar with the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · D2024-05-09 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate transfer techniques were utilized for two sampled residents (Resident #1 and #3) out of four sampled resident. The facility census was 94 residents. Review of the facility's Transfer-One Person Skills Checklist: -Check [NAME] for appropriate transfer technique. -Position chair, wheelchair, commode to resident's strong side. -Assist resident to sitting position with feet firmly on the floor. -Apply gait belt. -Have resident place their hands on you shoulders. -If transferring from chair, wheelchair, commode, have resident place hands on arm rests and push up while you pull resident up to a standing position. -Brace knees against resident's knees, or your knees on the outside of the resident's knees to block feet from sliding. -Ask resident to lean forward, count to three and ask resident to push up with legs while you pull resident to a standing position. 1. Review of Resident #1's admission Record showed the resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-08 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain the ceiling fans in the South nurses' station sitting area, free of a buildup of dust and failed to maintain the tube feeding poles in resident rooms [ROOM NUMBERS] free of debris on those poles. This practice potentially affected at least 10 residents who used the sitting area and two other residents who received tube feedings. The facility census was 92 residents. Observation on 1/5/23 at 9:45 A.M. with the Maintenance Director showed a buildup of dust on the ceiling fans over the South Nurses' station sitting area. During an interview on 1/5/23 at 9:47 A.M. the Maintenance Director said the housekeepers have extendable cleaners they can use to clean the fans. During a phone interview on 1/9/23 at 2:12 P.M., the Housekeeping Area Account Manager said he/she expected the Maintenance Personnel to clean the fans due to the height of the fans. 2. Observations on 1/2/24 at 9:46 A.M. and at 1:12 P.M., on 1/3/24 at 10:32 and A.M., and on 1/8/24 at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to TUTERA SENIOR LIVING & HEALTH CARE — 25 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 7 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.7M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 16% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MO