No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Windsor Estates Of St Charles

2150 West Randolph Street, Saint Charles, MO 63301 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 81 certified beds · (636) 946-4966 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Flagged for abuseResident-funds citations (F0569, F0570)Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)1 immediate-jeopardy citation1 actual-harm citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)$364,413 in federal fines2 Medicare payment denials
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • CMS has flagged it for abuse
  • it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602) — most recent May 2026
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has citations for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0569, F0570)
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (78) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $364,413 in federal fines (most recent 2026-05-19)
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (71%) runs well above the national median (45%)
  • its last standard health inspection was over 2 years ago — the star rating may not reflect current conditions

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 2 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
400 1st Capitol Dr · (636) 255-3003 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
488 S 5th St · (636) 949-5593 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
317 Hawthorne Ave · (636) 946-3898 · Call to confirm hours
Park
1900 W Randolph St · (636) 949-3372 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 2 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased5.4%18.1%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight1.4%5.3%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%1.1%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.4%2.3%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms28.7%18.5%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.9%4.1%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened7.4%17.4%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication33.3%25.6%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine93.8%90.9%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers9.3%4.5%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control15.6%17.8%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table16.9%23.5%17.1%typical
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%2.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine64.9%63.5%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission42.6%26.0%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit19.3%13.7%12.0%worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

31.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 27 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

31.1%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.2%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
0.30U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.10hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.14hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.06hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.30 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 47% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 7% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF31.1%CMS range 18.9–47.451.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024worse than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.2%CMS range 6.8–15.310.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay3.7%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened3.7%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.0%CMS range 3.2–11.37.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.961.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.20
RN hours/ resident / day
1.13
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.19
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.53
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.15
RN hoursweekends
71.4%
Total nursing turnover
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 81 beds and averages 72.7 residents a day — about 90% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.53 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.20 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.19 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.07 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.71 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.23 to 0.15 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 71% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

7
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2024-03-21)
20
at the previous standard inspection (2022-07-13)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

78 citations, most serious first. The 24 most serious are shown; the remaining 54 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · J2026-05-19 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, facility employees and service providers failed to provide services to a resident (Resident #79) that were necessary to avoid physical harm. Facility staff failed to follow facility policy and procedures, and physician orders for monitoring upon admission and when the resident, who had cardiac-related diagnosis, experienced a change in condition. Staff failed to follow physician's order to check the resident's blood pressure prior to administering blood pressure medication and failed to initiate orders for a muscle relaxer. The facility failed to use nursing judgement and knowledge to advocate for further medical evaluation when the resident expressed possible cardiac-related symptoms, including a feeling of something sitting on their chest on [DATE] and [DATE]. Staff failed to notify the resident's power of attorney, per facility policy, when the resident had a change in condition. The resident's power of attorney reported he/she would have wanted the resident evaluated at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2026-06-29 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to implement procedures to accurately acquire and administer prescribed medications for one resident (Resident #1) upon admission, in a review of seven sampled residents. On admission, the facility involved a third-party provider, a group of physicians and nurse practitioners who review and issue orders after hours, to review the resident's medications listed on the resident's hospital discharge orders. The third-party provider placed medications to treat the resident's pain, anxiety, migraine headaches, and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD, a disorder causing persistent patterns of inattention, hyperactivity, and impulsivity) on hold until the resident's physician reviewed and approved the orders. The facility failed to ensure the resident's physician was aware the third-party provider placed the resident's medications on hold. The resident, who was recovering from a fractured leg, did not receive as needed (PRN) pain medication for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2026-05-19 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to reorder an antianxiety medication timely for one resident (Resident #62), in a review of 28 sampled residents, to ensure the medication was available for administration. Resident #62 missed six doses of antianxiety medication. The resident had a panic attack (a sudden surge of overwhelming fear and physical discomfort), experienced withdrawal symptoms, and expressed feelings of hopelessness and not wanting to live. The facility census was 72. Upon request, the facility did not provide a policy regarding re-ordering controlled medications.Review of Resident #62's care plan, revised on 11/04/23, showed the following:-Diagnoses included anxiety disorder;-The resident had mood problems due to major depressive disorder, anxiety, and insomnia; -Give anti-anxiety medications as ordered. Monitor/document side effects and effectiveness. Review of the resident's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-12-15 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (Resident #1), in a review of six sampled residents, received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice when staff failed to assess Resident #1 following the report of a fall, failed to obtain treatment for two days following the fall, and failed to implement and follow physician orders for treatment following identification of the fall with injury. The resident sustained a fractured left wrist. The facility census was 73.Review of the facility Fall policy dated May 2025 showed the following:-Each resident of the community who experiences a fall will be treated and assessed to adequately treat any current injuries, either physical or psychosocial and comprehensively assessed to determine causal effects of the fall to develop interventions to prevent further falls. After each fall, an occurrence report will be completed, root cause will be determined, and interventions will be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-09-03 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Deficiency Text Not Available

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-08-07 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (Resident #9) of ten sampled residents, with a history of pressure ulcers received the necessary care and services, when staff failed to identify the presence of, history or risk of pressure ulcers including a pressure ulcer on admission on the resident's sacrum. The resident was identified eight days following admission [DATE]) with a Stage III pressure ulcer on his/her sacrum with an old dressing prior to the resident's transfer to a hospital. The facility had no documentation to show prior identification of the ulcer, assessment, treatment or a care plan to address the pressure ulcer. The facility census was 72.Review of the facility's policy, Wound Prevention, dated August 2023 showed the following:-Educate residents, their families, and staff members about wound prevention techniques and best practices;-Implement regular assessments and screening to identify residents at risk of developing wounds;-Create personalized service…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-05-02 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the safety of one resident (Resident #1) of 10 sampled residents when the resident fell out of bed while receiving care, sustained injuries and required treatment at a local hospital. The resident required staff assistance for bed mobility and care. The resident's bed had a mattress overlay that reportedly shifted on the bed. Staff rolled the resident to his/her side, turned away from the resident to get supplies, and the resident fell out of the bed to the floor. The resident sustained a laceration to the right side of the forehead, a skin tear to the right outer eyebrow area, a skin tear to the right forearm, and bruising to the right elbow. The resident was sent to a local hospital and required staples to close the laceration to the forehead. The facility census was 62. Upon request, the facility said they did not have a policy for monitoring of residents utilizing air mattresses or mattress overlays. 1. Review of Resident #1's face sheet…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-09-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the safety of one resident (Resident #2), a resident dependent on staff for bed mobility, when staff rolled the resident to his/her side in the bed to provide care, the resident reached out to the side opposite of staff, and fell from the bed to the floor. The resident was to have a fall mat in place on the floor per his/her care plan. No fall mat was in place at the time of the fall. Staff reported the resident often reached out during care, but the resident had not been reassessed for safety with bed mobility. The resident required hospitalization as a result of the fall and sustained injuries including intracranial hemorrhage (bleeding inside the head), epidural hematoma (collection of blood within the potential space between the outer layer of the dura mater and the inner table of the skull), subdural hematoma (occurs when a blood vessel in the space between the skull and the brain (the subdural space) is damaged) , concussion,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-07-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the safety of one resident (Resident #1), of five sampled residents, who was dependent upon staff for transfers and at risk for falls. Staff left the resident in bed positioned on mechanical lift mat with the bed in the high position and then left the room, leaving the resident unattended. The resident slid off the bed and fell to the floor sustaining a fracture of the left leg. The facility census was 60. The administrator was notified on 7/30/24 at 10:00 A.M., of the Past Non-Compliance which occurred on 7/16/24. On 7/16/24, the administrator became aware of the injury to Resident #1 which resulted from a fall from the bed. The facility began an investigation and determined that the resident was left unattended and had a fall from the bed which resulted in a fractured left leg. The facility began in-servicing all staff on safety, transferring the resident and not to leave a resident unattended while in bed. Residents were assessed for bed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2023-11-20 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Refer to K2AZ12. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain and administer pain medication timely after pain was identified, failed to obtain a prescription from the resident's physician for the pain medication, failed to ensure the medication was available for administration, and failed to plan care with interventions to address the resident's pain for two residents (Resident #1 and #3) out of three sampled residents. Resident #1 had an order for oxycodone (narcotic medication used to relieve severe pain), 5 milligrams (mg) two times (BID) a day for pain. The facility failed to obtain a refill for the resident's oxycodone resulting in the resident not having the pain medication for five days. The resident's pain level was high and the resident reported he/she became very angry and upset and aggressive due to the pain being out of control. The census was 62. The facility did not provide a policy for pain or for ordering or re-ordering narcotic medications. 1. Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2023-10-03 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the necessary treatment and services consistent with standards of practice, when the facility failed to ensure weekly skin assessments were completed to include measurements, appearance, and any other wound characteristics for one resident, (Resident #2) of two sampled residents. The resident presented with a new open area on the sacrum (triangular bone at the base of the spine) on 9/16/23. The facility failed to consistently assess the wound to identify any changes in the wound necessitating a change in treatment. On 9/30/23, a wound care consultant assessed the resident's wound was now a Stage III pressure ulcer (full thickness tissue loss, subcutaneous fat may be visible, but bone, tendon, or muscle is not exposed. Slough (dead skin) may be present but does not obscure the depth of tissue loss. May include undermining and tunneling). The census was 59. Review of the facility policy for Wound Care System Requirements revised 3/21 showed: -The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2023-10-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to safely transfer one resident (Resident #1), in a review of two sampled residents, when staff failed to utilize a sit to stand lift to transfer the resident per the resident's plan of care and was at risk for falls. Staff transferred the resident using a transfer belt, the resident's knees buckled, causing staff to lower the resident to the floor and the resident suffered a fractured femur (large bone in the upper leg). The facility census was 58. Review of the facility policy for Safe Lifting and Movement of Residents, dated 1/17, showed: -Resident safety, dignity, comfort and medical condition will be incorporated into goals and decisions regarding the safe lifting and moving of residents; -Manual lifting of residents shall be eliminated when feasible; -Staff responsible for direct resident care will be trained in the use of manual (gait/transfer belt, slide boards) and mechanical lifting devices; -Mechanical lifts shall be made readily available and accessible to staff 24 hours a day. Back-up battery packs on remote…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2023-10-03 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain and administer pain medication timely after pain was identified, failed to obtain a prescription from the resident's physician for the pain medication, failed to ensure the medication was available for administration, and failed to plan care with interventions to address the resident's pain for two residents (Resident #1 and #3) out of three sampled residents. Resident #1 had an order for oxycodone (narcotic medication used to relieve severe pain), 5 milligrams (mg) two times (BID) a day for pain. The facility failed to obtain a refill for the resident's oxycodone resulting in the resident not having the pain medication for five days. The resident's pain level was high and the resident reported he/she became very angry and upset and aggressive due to the pain being out of control. The census was 62. The facility did not provide a policy for pain or for ordering or re-ordering narcotic medications. 1. Review of Resident #1's face…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2022-07-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe environment for one resident(Resident #205) of 20 sampled residents and one additional resident (Resident #40). Maintenance staff failed to fix a grab bar in Resident #205 and #40's bathroom that both residents used. The grab bar came out of the wall during Resident #205's use, he/she fell, hitting his/her head. The resident was evaluated at the hospital and sustained a closed head injury as a result. The facility census was 54. The facility provided no policy regarding work order completion expectations. 1. Review of Resident #40's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument, completed by facility staff, dated 4/28/22, showed the following: -Cognitively intact; -Required total dependence of two staff for transfers; -Required extensive, physical assistance of one staff for toilet use; -Functional limitation in range of motion (ROM); lower extremity impairment on both sides; -Always continent…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-19 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide residents with a safe, clean, and homelike environment, including providing housekeeping and maintenance services necessary to maintain an orderly, odor free, and comfortable interior. The facility census was 72. 1. During an interview on 05/19/26 at approximately 1:30 P.M., the Regional Nurse Consultant said the facility did not have a specific policy related to homelike environment. 2. Observation on 05/11/26 at 3:50 P.M. showed the shared closet door in occupied resident room [ROOM NUMBER] was off the track and dragged on the floor. During an interview on 05/11/25 at 3:50 P.M., the resident who resided in room [ROOM NUMBER] said the closet door dragged on the floor and got off the track. Staff would fix it and then it would break again. 3. Observation on 05/11/26 at 4:05 P.M., showed bed A in occupied resident room [ROOM NUMBER] would not lower to a low position and bed B was difficult to raise up and down. During interviews on 05/11/26 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-19 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow physician orders for three residents (Residents #81, #36, and #42), in a review of 28 sampled residents. Staff failed to administer medications as ordered on admission for Resident #81 and failed to obtain blood tests as ordered for Residents #36 and #42. The facility census was 72. Review of the facility's policy, Medication Administration, dated May 2019, showed the following: -Purpose: To administer all medications safely and appropriately to aid residents to overcome illness, relieve and prevent symptoms, and help in diagnosis;-If medication is ordered but not present, call the pharmacy or supervisor to obtain the medication. During an interview on 05/13/26 at 2:55 P.M., the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) said a check list in the nursing communication book gave directions to staff on what to do when a resident was admitted . The facility did not have a specific policy related to the process to follow for new admissions.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-19 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide eight residents (Residents #2, #9, #18, #29, #42, #45, #52, and #64), who required staff assistance for activities of daily living (ADLs), in a review of 28 sampled residents, the necessary care to maintain good personal hygiene. The facility census was 72. Review of the facility's policy, Activities of Daily Living,( ADLs), dated 09/24/25, showed the facility provided each resident with care, treatment, and services according to the resident's individualized care plan. The facility did not provide a policy related to oral care. 1. Review of Resident #2's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument, completed by facility staff, dated 03/16/26, showed the resident was dependent on staff for oral hygiene. Review of the resident's care plan, revised 04/06/26, showed the following:-Diagnoses included need for assistance with personal cares;-The resident had a feeding tube;-The resident had a swallowing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-19 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident environment remains as free of accident hazards as is possible, when the facility staff failed to follow facility policy during a manual transfer for one resident (Resident #51), in a review of 28 sampled residents, when staff failed to use a gait belt (device used to transfer residents from one position to another) and lock the resident's wheelchair brakes when assisting the resident to transfer from his/her wheelchair to the common area couch. The facility failed to propel one resident (Resident #18) safely when staff transported the resident in his/her wheelchairs without foot pedals. The resident's right foot was bent backwards and dragged against the floor underneath the wheelchair. The facility failed to utilize a sit-to-stand lift (a transfer device that helps partially-weight bearing individuals transition between sitting and standing positions) per the owner's manual for one resident (Resident #9), when staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-04-01 · tag F0569 — pattern
    Notify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide a final accounting of resident fund balances within thirty days to the individual or probate jurisdiction administering the resident's estate for six of six sampled residents (Residents #1, #2, #3, #4, #5 and #6). The facility withdrew back room and board without the resident and/or financial guardian's written authorization or after the resident expired. The facility census was 72.1. Review of the facility maintained Resident Trust Ledger for the period [DATE] through [DATE], showed Resident #3 expired on [DATE].Review of Resident #3's Ledger showed $8,119.01 held in the Resident Trust Account on [DATE]. Funds in the amount of $3,904.41 were reported to the Department of Social Services Third Party Liability (TPL) Unit on [DATE] and did not include the full balance of the resident's funds. The remaining funds in the amount of $3,311.00 was withdrawn for 09/2025's room and board in the amount of $1,051.00 and back room and board in the amount…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide protective oversight and prevent falls for one resident (Resident #2) in a review of six residents when staff failed to ensure the resident's bed was always in the lowest position while the resident was in bed. The facility also failed to ensure the resident's low air loss mattress (a specialized, medical, mattress with inflatable air cells that continuously circulate ai and provides pressure redistribution) was at the appropriate weight setting to prevent falls from bed. The facility census was 73.Review of the facility Fall Policy, dated May 2025, showed the following:-The purpose of the fall program was to develop, implement, observe and evaluate an interdisciplinary approach and manage strategies and interventions that foster resident independence and quality of life. The fall program promotes safety, prevention and education of both staff and residents;-The community shall ensure the fall program is maintained to reduce the occurrence of falls, reduce risk of injury and promote independence and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-07 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure four residents (Resident #1, #3, #4, and #6), of eight sampled residents, who required assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADL's) received the necessary care and services to maintain good grooming when staff failed to provide nail care. The facility census was 63.Review of the undated facility policy for Activities of Daily Living showed this facility provides each resident with care, treatment, and services according to the resident's individualized care plan. Review of the undated facility policy for Foot Care showed the following:-This community will ensure that all residents receive proper treatment and care to maintain mobility and good foot health by providing foot care and treatment in accordance with professional standards or practice including prevention of complications from a resident's medical condition and assisting the resident in making appointments with a qualified person and arranging for transportation to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-07 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff prepared and served food at a safe and appetizing temperature. The facility census was 68. Review of the undated facility policy for Monitoring Food Temperatures for Meal Service showed:-Food temperatures will be monitored daily to prevent food borne illness and ensure foods are served at palatable temperatures;-Prior to serving a meal, food temperatures will be taken and documented for all hot and cold foods to ensure proper servicing temperatures. Any food item not found at the correct holding/serving temperature will not be served unless appropriate action is taken, such as reheating;-If the serving/holding temperature of a hot food item is not at 135 degrees Fahrenheit (F) or higher (check state specific regulations) when checked prior to meal service, the item will be reheated to at least 165 degree F for a minimum of 15 seconds-If the serving/holding temperature of a cold food item or beverage is not at 41 degree F or below (for less than four hours in duration) when checked prior to meal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-07 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain the main parking lot. The facility census was 68. Observation on 8/7/25 at 12:45 P.M. and again at 7:30 P.M. showed the facility front driveway and parking lot with a large area of damaged asphalt. The area was approximately ten feet in diameter and approximately 8-10 inches in depth at the center. This area was at the end of the visitor parking area and would affect any vehicle using the area for travel. During an interview on 8/15/25 at 2:00 P.M. the Administrator said he was aware the area needed repair, there were several projects in the works; he would expect the area to be repaired. Complaint #2566328

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-10 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Deficiency Text Not Available

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 54 citations
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-05-02 · tag F0801 — widespread
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Dietary Manager (DM) had the appropriate competencies and skills set to carry out the function of the food and nutrition services. This practice effected all residents in a facility. The facility census was 62. The facility did not have a policy regarding training or competency requirements for the Dietary Manager. 1. Review of the Food Establishment Inspection Report from the local county health department dated 2/12/25 showed: -Foodborne Illness Risk Factors and Public Health Interventions: Supervision: Certified Food Protection Manager out of compliance; -2-102 in accordance with Section 2-102-11, the person in charge must successfully complete a program that is approved by the Department for food protection manager certification and have posted in the food establishment a current certificated of training issued by the program; During an interview on 5/1/25 at 10:30 A.M. the DM said the following: -He had been the dietary manager for a couple of years; -He was enrolled in an online dietary manager course with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-05-02 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to properly label food for expiration date, failed to discard food that has passed the expiration date as identified on the food label, failed to maintain one refrigerator to be free of rust and ice build up and failed to ensure a thermometer was present in the refrigerator. The facility failed to label and date when a food item was opened and refrigerated. The facility census was 62. Review of the undated facility policy for Food storage (Dry, Refrigerated, and Frozen) showed the following: -Food shall be stored on shelves in a clean, dry area, free from contaminants. Food shall be stored at appropriate temperatures using appropriate methods to ensure the highest level of food safety; -All food items will be labeled. The label must include the name of the food and the date by which it should be sold, consumed, or discharged ; -Discard food that has passed the expiration date; -Keep potentially hazardous foods out of the temperature danger…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-02 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure facility staff provided four residents (Resident #2, #6, #10 and #11), who were unable to perform their own activities of daily living, the necessary care and services to maintain good personal hygiene and prevent body odor, in a review of 11 sampled residents. The facility census was 61. Review of the facility's undated policy, Activities of Daily Living, showed the following: -The facility provides each resident with care, treatment and services according to the resident's individualized care plan; -Based on the individual resident's comprehensive assessment, facility staff will ensure that each resident's abilities in activities of daily living do not diminish unless circumstances of the resident's clinical condition demonstrate that the decline was unavoidable, including bathing and grooming. Upon request, the facility responded they did not have a policy for showers, shaving, nail care or haircuts. 1. Review of the Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-02 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolated
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain the water supply to the dishwasher in good working condition. The water pipe to the dishwasher leaked, causing water to pool under the dishwasher and run onto the floor in the dishwashing area. The facility census was 62. 1. Review of an inspection report dated 2/12/25 from the local county public health department showed: -Leaking plumbing or plumbing in disrepair; -Out of compliance with plumbing. Observation on 5/1/25 between 9:50 A.M. to 2:30 P.M. and again on 5/2/25 between 6:30 A.M. to 12:30 P.M. showed the following: -Water dripped out of pipes located under the dishwashing machine in the kitchen; -Pooled water under the dishwasher and the shelving attached to the dishwasher that flowed out from under the dishwasher and onto the floor. During an interview on 5/2/25 at 11:15 A.M. [NAME] C said the following: -The dishwasher had been leaking for over a year; -The kitchen staff mop up the water several times a day. During an interview on 5/1/25 at 10:20 A.M. the Dietary Manager said the following:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-04 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received care and services in accordance with professional standards of practice when staff failed to ensure ordered medications were available for administration for two residents (Resident #1 and Resident #2), in a review of four sampled residents. The facility census was 61. 1. Review of Resident #1's face sheet showed the resident admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of infection of a joint prosthesis and low back pain. Review of the resident's physician orders dated 2/18/25 showed an order for Tramadol (medication used to relieve moderate to moderately severe pain, including pain after surgery) 50 milligrams (mg) every six hours as needed (PRN) for pain. Review of the resident's nurses note dated 2/19/25 at 6:03 P.M., showed staff notified the physician about the resident complaints of lower back pain, that Tramadol had not been delivered at this time and the physician needed to sign a script for the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-02-21 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — widespread
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain a call system that was adequately equipped to to ensure staff received alerts through a communication system which relayed the call directly to a staff member or to a centralized staff work area with an audible sound. This affected the entire facility. The facility census was 66. 1. Review of the facility's daily census sheet provided by the facility on 2/21/25 showed the following: -100 hall with 19 residents; -200 hall with 29 residents; -300 hall with 18 residents. 2. Review of Resident #1's comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by staff, dated 12/19/24 showed the following: -Able to make self understood and able to understand others; -Alert and oriented and able to make decision; -Requires supervision with transfers from bed to chair or toilet and from chair or toilet to bed. Observation on 2/21/25 at 11:03 A.M. showed the resident lay in bed with a call light cord next to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-07-17 · tag F0620 — pattern
    Not require residents to give up Medicare or Medicaid benefits, or pay privately as a condition of admission; and must tell residents what care they do not provide.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop an admission policy and implement an admission protocol to ensure residents and/or residents' representatives signed the admission agreement for one resident (Resident #10). The facility also failed to ensure at least a 30 day notice was provided to four residents (Resident #2, #5, #6, and #11) and/or the resident representatives in writing for an increase in charges for services provided to residents at the facility. The facility census was 59. During an interview on 7/22/24 at 2:45 P.M. the administrator said the facility did not have an admission policy. Review of the facility's Financial Responsibility Agreement, private method of payment section, dated October 2015, showed the following: -The agreement is for payment for the care and services that are provided to the resident by the facility; -The facility will provide the resident and his/her authorized representative with not less than 30 days prior written notice of any increase in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-03-21 · tag F0801 — widespread
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to employee a Food Service Director (FSD) with credentials that were not expired. This failure had the potential to affect 55 of 55 residents as there were no enteral feeding residents at the facility. Findings include: Interview on 03/20/24 at 8:05 AM the Director of Nursing (DON) stated the facility has a Registered Dietician (RD) who was at the facility two days a week. The DON stated that the FSD does not have a certification at this time. The DON stated the FSD started in October of 2023 and the Administrator (ADM)2 was going to pay and enroll the FSD in the certification course, however, this did not occur. Interview on 03/20/24 at 11:35 AM, the FSD confirmed that he started October 2023 and that he has started the certification course but has not completed it. Interview on 03/21/24 at 11:25 AM, the Regional Director of Operations (RDO) stated the FSD did not have his certification for food and safety management. Review of facility's job description titled, 6001 Dietary Supervisor Position Description supplied by the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-21 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident that had nasal medication and two inhaler medications on the resident's bedside had a self-administration of medication assessment, a physician's order, and care plan completed for one of one resident (Resident (R) 3) reviewed for self-administration of medications. Failure to assess and care plan residents for self-administration of medications increases the potential of medication errors for residents. Findings include: Review of facility's policy titled, Self-Administration of Medications by Residents, dated 05/19, revealed Self-administration medications will be encouraged if it is desired by the resident, safe for the resident and other residents of the facility, ordered by the attending physician, and approved by the Interdisciplinary team (IDT). Procedure: 1. Each resident is offered the opportunity to self-administer his or her medications during the routine assessment by the facility IDT. 2. If…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-21 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure an allegation of injury of unknown origin was reported to the State of Missouri Department of Health and Senior Services State Agency (SA) timely for one or one (Resident (R) 21) reviewed for abuse in the sample of 19. Findings include: Review of R21's admission Record, located in the Profile tab of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed admission to the facility on [DATE] and readmission was on 03/18/24 with diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease, cerebral infarction, and repeated falls. Review of R21's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) under the MDS tab of the EMR, with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 12/26/23, revealed the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), was unable to be completed due to the resident was rarely understood. Review of the facility's Reportable Event revealed that R21's injury of unknown origin was found on 03/12/24 at 8:49 AM. However, the incident was not reported until 03/18/24 at 3:11 PM. Review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-21 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure an investigation was immediately initiated when an allegation of injury of unknown origin was found for one of one resident (Resident (R) 21) reviewed for abuse in the sample of 19. Findings include: Review of R21's admission Record, located in the Profile tab of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed admission to the facility on [DATE] and readmission was on 03/18/24 with diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease, cerebral infarction, and repeated falls. Review of R21's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) under the MDS tab of the EMR, with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 12/26/23, revealed the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), was unable to be completed due to resident was rarely understood. Review of the facility's Reportable Event revealed R21's injury of unknown origin was found on 03/12/24 at 8:49 AM. However, the investigation was not initiated until 03/18/24. Review of a Nurse's Note, in the EMR, under the Notes tab…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-21 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, and interview, the facility failed to update the resident's care plan with new interventions for one of three residents (R )21) care plans reviewed in the sample of 19. Specifically, R21, who had wandering behaviors, left the skilled nursing unit without staff knowledge or supervision and was found in the portion of the building identified as the independent living Bistro on 09/03/23 and then again found missing for over two hours on 10/05/23 in the portion of the building identified as the chapel which was located past two closed double doors at the end of the hall. Findings include: Review of R21's admission Record, located in the Profile tab of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed admission to the facility on [DATE] and readmission was on 03/18/24 with diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease, cerebral infarction, and repeated falls. Review of R21's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) under the MDS tab of the EMR, with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 12/26/23, revealed the Brief…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview and policy review, the facility failed to prevent a resident with wandering behaviors from leaving the skilled nursing unit without staff's knowledge or supervision for one of three residents (R )21) reviewed for accidents in the sample of 19. Specifically, R21 left the skilled nursing unit and was found in the portion of the building identified as the independent living Bistro on 09/03/23 and then again found missing for over two hours on 10/05/23 in the portion of the building identified as the chapel which was located past two closed double doors at the end of the hall. Findings include: Review of R21's admission Record, located in the Profile tab of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed admission to the facility on [DATE] and readmission was on 03/18/24 with diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease, cerebral infarction, and repeated falls. Review of R21's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) under the MDS tab of the EMR, with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure that the Certified Nurse Aide (CNA)changed gloves and performed hand hygiene when going from a contaminated area to a clean area for one of one resident (Resident (R) 18) observed for catheter care from a total of 18 residents sampled, to prevent possible cross contamination. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Prevention of Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infections, dated 2019, revealed .Standard Precautions .2. Hand hygiene is performed immediately after any manipulation of or contact with the catheter site, catheter, tubing, drainage bag, or emptying container, even when gloves were worn. Review of facility policy titled, Standard Precautions, dated 2019, revealed Gloves . Policy .3. Sterile gloves and examination gloves are removed .d. before touching uncontaminated surfaces or other areas of the same resident's body that may be uncontaminated. Review of R18's (facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-03 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff provided one resident (Resident #1 and #2 ), who were unable to perform own activities of daily living (ADLs), in a review of 5 sampled residents, the necessary care and services to maintain good personal hygiene. The facility census was 57. The facility did not provide a policy for Peri Care for the gender specific resident. Review of the undated Skills Checklist for Peri Care ( a tool used to train staff on how to properly provide peri care showed the following: -Apply gloves; -Help the resident into a dorsal recumbent (lying on the back with the knees slightly bent) position; -Wash and dry upper thighs; -Separate the perineal folds and wash in a down stroke alternating from side to side moving outward on the thighs; -Use a different wash cloth for each stroke; -With fresh water and a clean washcloth, rinse area thoroughly with same strokes; -Gently pat dry; -Position the resident on the side exposing buttocks; -Clean rectal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-03 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure nursing staff washed their hands and changed gloves appropriately while performing peri care for two residents (Resident #1 and #2), of five sampled residents. The facility census was 57. Review of the undated facility policy for Hand Hygiene showed the following: -Appropriate hand hygiene is essential in preventing transmission of infectious agents; -Hand hygiene continues to be the primary means of preventing the transmission of infection. Hand hygiene (washing hands and or Alcohol-Based Hand Rub (ABHR) are consistent with accepted standards of practice such as the use of ABHR instead of soap and water in all clinical situations except when hands are visibly soiled (e.g. blood, body fluids) or after caring for a resident with a known or suspected Clostridium (C.) difficle (an infection affecting the gut) or norovirus (an infection affecting the gastro intestinal tract) infection during an outbreak; if exposure to Bacillius…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-03 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow physician orders for one resident (Resident #2) of two sampled residents, when staff failed to notify the physician and obtain orders for blood work and an x-ray that were recommended from an outside wound care provider. The facility census was 59. The facility did not provide a policy for following physician orders or policy for notifying the physician of recommendations from an outside wound care provider. 1. Review of Resident #1's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by staff, dated 9/15/23 showed: -The resident was unable to understand or make self understood; -Was not oriented to person, place or time; -Totally dependent upon two staff members for Activities of Daily Living (ADL's); -Diagnoses of stroke, diabetes, and Crohn's disease (an inflammatory bowel disease that causes chronic inflammation of the GI tract, which extends from the stomach all the way down to the anus). Review of the outside wound care provider's note dated 9/29/23 showed: -Labs orders of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-03 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (Resident #2), of two sampled residents, received care and services to prevent weight loss. Staff failed to obtain weights per facility protocol. As a result, the facility failed to identify the resident's weight loss and failed to notify the physician and dietitian of the weight loss to address the weight loss. The resident had a weight loss of 5.3 pounds in 23 days for a 6.81% weight loss (considered severe loss). The facility census was 59. Review of the facility policy for Weight Assessment and Interventions dated 1/2017 showed: -Weight Assessment: Nursing staff will measure the resident's weights on admission, and weekly for four weeks thereafter If no weight concerns are noted at this point, weights will be measured monthly; -Weights will be recorded in the individual's medical record; -The threshold for significant unplanned and undesired weight loss will be based on the following criteria: one month - 5% weight…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-07-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff followed appropriate infection control procedures when staff failed to change gloves after performing an accucheck procedure (finger stick to obtain blood), for one resident (Resident #32) in a review of 20 sampled residents. Staff handled multiple residents' insulin pens with contaminated gloves and gave insulin with contaminated gloves. The facility also failed to keep one resident's (Resident #9)'s ,urine collection bag off the floor to reduce risk of infection. Further review showed the facility failed to implement their water management program to identify and reduce the risk of Legionella bacteria (cause of Legionnaire's disease - a severe form of pneumonia) growth and spread. The facility census was 54. Review of a facility policy titled, Blood Sampling - Capillary (Finger Sticks), reviewed February 2021, showed the following: -Steps in the Procedure: 1. Wash hands. Explain procedure to resident. 2. [NAME] gloves. 3. Place blood glucose monitoring device on clean field. 4. Place a new…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-07-13 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — pattern
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure one resident (Resident #10) had a call light or other means of summoning staff when needed, and failed to ensure two residents (Resident #1, 21), who were dependent on staff for activities of daily living, consistently had access to a call light or other means of summoning staff within reach of the residents, in a sample of 20 residents. The census was 53. During an interview on 7/7/22 at 4:36 P.M., the interim administrator said the facility did not have a policy regarding call lights. 1. Review of Resident #20's care plan, dated 1/25/22, showed the resident was totally dependent on staff with his/her activities of daily living (ADLs) and mobility with cerebrovascular accident (stroke) with dysphagia (difficulty or discomfort in swallowing, as a symptom of disease) and left hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body). Observation on 7/5/22 at 11:35 A.M., showed the resident lay in bed. The resident's call light was on the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-07-13 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide housekeeping and maintenance services necessary to ensure the environment was clean and maintained in good repair. The facility census was 54. Observation on 7/5/22 at 11:18 A.M. in resident room [ROOM NUMBER], showed the following: -Two wood sliding closet doors would not open or close properly. Both sliding closet doors were marred and scratched; -The flooring in the room was covered with numerous white areas of dried debris; -The drywall was marred and the cove base was peeled back at the base of the wall by the bathroom. Observation on 7/5/22 at 9:56 A.M., 11:22 A.M., and 1:48 P.M. in resident room [ROOM NUMBER], showed the following: -The flooring in the room was covered with a heavy buildup of crusty dried debris; -The drywall was marred and missing paint; -White flakes of paint were located on the floor next to the bathroom and on the bathroom floor; -A large stain approximately 1 foot by 2 feet on the bathroom floor;…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-07-13 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents knew how they could file a grievance other than through resident council, failed to ensure the facility responded to all grievances and made prompt efforts to resolve any grievances. Residents said they felt their concerns were not heard or addressed. The facility did not follow their policy with the administrator signing, reviewing and documenting the completion of the grievance process. The facility census was 54. Review of the facility policy, titled Resident Grievance Policy and Procedures, revised February 2021, showed the following: -It is the intent of this facility/community to encourage residents, their representatives or family members, opportunities to communicate any concerns, suggestions, complaints or opportunities for improvement in care or services. This facility/community offers a variety of mechanisms to communicate this information. One of these is the Grievance Process; -POLICY: Utilization of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-07-13 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — pattern
    Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (Resident #805), in a review of 20 sampled residents, was free from misappropriation of property, when the former Director of Nursing (DON) misappropriated the resident's narcotics. The former DON had pulled the resident's narcotic medication from the active medication cart, stating the medication had been discontinued when there was no documentation to support the medication had been discontinued. Further review showed the former DON improperly prepared the medication for destruction and upon investigation, there was one less tablet accounted for than was on the narcotic control sheet. The facility census was 54. Review of the undated pharmacy Controlled Substance Storage and Handling policy showed the following: -Policy: Controlled substances (medications in Schedule II, III, IV, V) have high abuse potential and may be subject to handling, storage and record keeping; -Procedure: -E: 3) Schedule II medications and any other medications that the facility requires a more stringent control, will be kept…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-07-13 · tag F0638 — pattern
    Assure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated resident assessment completed by the facility staff, was completed no less than once every three months for two of 20 sampled residents (Resident #5 and #6). The facility census was 54. Review of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual MDS 3.0, dated 2019, showed the following: -The OBRA of 1987 provided the statutory authority for federal statute and regulations that required nursing homes to conduct initial and periodic assessments for all their residents. The assessment information is used to develop, review, and revise the resident's plans of care that will be used to provide services to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being; -The Quarterly Assessment is a non-comprehensive assessment for a resident that must be completed at least every 92 days following the previous OBRA assessment of any type; -It is used…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-07-13 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow standards of practice and physician orders for four residents (Residents #21, #28, #32 and #42) in a review of 20 sampled residents, and for one additional resident (Residents #5). Staff did not follow physician orders, did not prepare or administer medications as ordered, did not ensure medications were available for administration, administered medications when they were not ordered, did not administer resident's gastrostomy tube (G-tube; a tube inserted into the stomach that brings nutrition/medications directly into the stomach) medication correctly or ensure tube feeding infused per order, did not prime an insulin pen prior to administration to ensure the correct dose was administered and did not check vital signs as ordered before the administration of medications. The facility census was 54. Review of the on-line Enteral Nutrition Practice Recommendations, a comprehensive guide developed by an interdisciplinary task force in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-07-13 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure four residents (Residents #9, #21, #28, and #206), in a review of 20 sampled residents, who required assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs), received the necessary care and services to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene. The facility census was 54. Review of the facility policy titled, Dental Care, revised 2021, did not address expectations of staff providing oral care to residents. Review of the facility's undated document titled, Oral Hygiene Skills Check, showed for the unconscious resident - repeat oral hygiene as often as necessary to keep the mouth and lips clean and moist. Review of the Nurse Assistant in a Long Term Care Facility manual, Revision November 2001, showed the following: -Purposes of oral hygiene (mouth care)-A clean mouth and properly functioning teeth are essential for physical and mental well-being of the resident: Prevent infections in mouth, Remove food particles and plaque, Stimulate…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-07-13 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — pattern
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure three residents (Residents #1, #21, and #32), in a review of 20 sampled residents, were provided an ongoing activities program in accordance with the resident's comprehensive assessment, care plan, and the resident's preferences, designed to meet their individual interests and their physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. The facility census was 54. Review of the Nurse Assistant in a Long Term Care Facility manual, revised November 2001, showed the following: -Responsibilities of the nurse assistant in resident activities: -Suggest activities of interest to the resident in a positive, enthusiastic way; -Check activity calendar daily and plan care accordingly. Encourage resident to select activities of personal interest to attend; -See that the resident is toileted, clean, and properly dressed before taking him/her to the activity; -See that the resident goes or is taken to the proper place at the right time; -See that the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-07-13 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure inventories of schedule II controlled substance medication (substances in this schedule have a high potential for abuse which may lead to severe psychological or physical dependence) were securely stored behind two locks when staff that received the medications left the narcotic controlled substances on a desk and unattended. The medications came up missing as a result. Further review showed the current Director of Nursing (DON) stored oxycodone immediate release (IR), a schedule II narcotic controlled substance for pain, in his office with no accountability. The facility census was 54. Review of the facility CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE POLICY, revised 2/2021, showed the following: -Controlled substances are subject to special handling, storage, disposal and record-keeping requirements. The facility will maintain compliance with these special provisions; -PROCEDURES: 1. Controlled substances in Schedules II, III and IV are subject to special handling, storage, disposal and record-keeping requirements. Such…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-07-13 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure insulin (medication used to treat diabetes) pens for two residents (Residents #8 and #32), were dated when opened and/or discarded within the designated time frame after opening. Further review showed the facility failed to discard expired stock medications and staff administered the expired medication to one resident (Resident #32). The facility census was 54. Review of the Food and Drug Administration guidelines for Novolog (insulin), Levemir (insulin) and Lantus (insulin) showed the following: -Novolog Insulin should be discarded 28 days after opening; -Lantus Solostar pens should be discarded 28 days after opening. The facility provided no policy regarding insulin administration, storage or destruction. 1. Review of Resident #32's July 2022 Physician Order Sheets (POS) showed the following: -Lantus Solostar (injectable diabetic medication) 13 units (u) every day; discard the remainder of this medication 28 days after first use; -Novolog (injectable diabetic medication) every six hours per sliding…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-07-13 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff followed the menu by not preparing or serving all food items for lunch as directed by the spreadsheet menu on 07/07/22. The facility census was 54. Review on 07/07/22 of the facility policies showed no documentation of a policy for following the menu. Review of the diet spreadsheet for lunch on 07/07/22 showed the following: -Residents on a pureed diet were to receive pureed roll and pureed cream cheese brownie; -All residents, except low concentrated sweet and heart healthy diets, were to receive cream cheese brownie. Review of the Diet Roster-By Diet, dated 07/07/22, showed five residents with a physician's order for a pureed diet. Observation on 07/07/22 at 10:23 A.M. showed staff prepared pureed rolls and cream cheese brownies, including pureed cream cheese brownies, for the lunch meal. Observation on 07/07/22 between 11:52 A.M. and 12:38 P.M., during the lunch meal service, showed staff did not serve pureed rolls to the residents on a pureed diet. Staff did not serve cream cheese brownies to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-07-13 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff prepared and served food at a safe and appetizing temperature. The facility census was 54. Review on 07/07/22 of the facility policies showed no documentation of a policy for food temperatures. Observation on 07/07/22 at 11:52 A.M. of the dining room showed staff served residents the noon meal from the steam table which included meatloaf and peas. Observation on 07/07/22 at 12:46 P.M. of the test tray, received after the last resident was served, showed the following food temperatures: -The peas were 103 degrees Farenheit (F) and cool to taste; -The pureed peas were 111 degrees F and cool to taste; -The ground meatloaf was 104 degrees F and cool to taste. During interview on 07/07/22 at 1:02 P.M., Dietary staff A said the food should be served at 165 degrees F so it was not too hot. The food did not keep temperature because the steam table cover had been taken off to serve the food. During interview on 07/07/22 at 1:10 P.M., the dietary manager said she expected the food to be served at at least…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-07-13 · tag F0924 — pattern
    Put firmly secured handrails on each side of hallways.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure corridors were equipped with firmly secured handrails on each side of the hall. The facility census was 54. Observations on 7/5/22 between 10:57 A.M. and 4:33 P.M. and on 7/6/22 at 2:53 P.M. showed the following: -A 6-foot section of handrail outside resident room [ROOM NUMBER] was loose from the wall and not secured; -A 3-foot section of handrail outside resident room [ROOM NUMBER] was loose from the wall and not secured; -A 2-foot section of handrail outside resident room [ROOM NUMBER] was loose from the wall and not secured; -A 3-foot section of handrail between resident room [ROOM NUMBER] and 304 was loose from the wall and not secured; -A section of handrail between room [ROOM NUMBER] and room [ROOM NUMBER] was loose and moved slightly when grasped; -A 3-foot section of handrail outside resident room [ROOM NUMBER] was loose from the wall and not secured; -Two 3-foot sections of handrail outside resident room [ROOM NUMBER] were loose from the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-07-13 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's choice of code status (full code (if the heart stops beating or breathing ceases, all life saving methods are performed) or no code (do not resuscitate (DNR), no life prolonging methods are performed)) was consistent and without conflicting information, throughout two residents' (Resident #32 and #206's) medical records, in a review of 20 sampled residents. The facility census was 54. Review of the facility policy titled, Advance Directives, revised February 2021, showed the following: 1. Prior to or upon admission of a resident to our facility, the Social Services Director or designee will provide written information to the resident concerning his/her right to make decisions concerning medical care, including the right to accept or refuse medical or surgical treatment, and the right to formulate advance directives; 3. Prior to or upon admission of a resident, the Social Services Director or designee will inquire of the resident,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-07-13 · tag F0637 — isolated
    Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete a significant change in status assessment (SCSA) Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment, required to be completed by facility staff, for one residents (Resident #34), in a review of 20 sampled residents, within 14 days after the facility determined, or should have determined, there had been a significant change (major decline or improvement in the resident's status) in the resident's physical or mental condition which had an impact on more than one area of the resident's health status, and required interdisciplinary review and/or revision of the care plan. The facility census was 54. Review of the facility policy titled, Care Planning - Interdisciplinary Team Policy, reviewed February 2021, showed the following: -Policy: Every resident will be assessed using the Minimum Data Set (MDS) according to the guidelines set forth in the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) manual; -Purpose: 1) To assess each resident's strengths,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-07-13 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed complete a thorough assessment of one resident (Resident #2), in a review of ten sampled residents, upon admission to ensure identification and appropriate services were in place to address the resident's needs. The resident was admitted to the facility from the hospital following the amputation of toes on his/her left foot on 12/8/22. The facility did not conduct a skin assessment, did not remove dressings on the resident's foot, and did not obtain orders to treat the surgical wounds on the resident's left foot until 12/13/22 (five days following admission). The facility census was 58. Review of facility's undated New admission Process Checklist showed the following: -Complete full skin assessment; -Call physician and verify medication orders. 1. Review of Resident #2's hospital records showed he/she under went surgical procedure to remove toes of his/her left foot on 11/14/22. Review of the resident's face sheet, dated 12/8/22, showed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2019-08-22 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow proper sanitation and food handling practices. The facility census was 58. 1. Review of facility's policy Food Safety, dated 2006, showed the facility will provide food that is free from contamination thus risking the health and well being of the residents and staff. Review of facility's policy Employee Hygiene, dated 2006, showed employees must keep their hands, arms and fingernails clean. 2. Observation on 8/19/19 at 11:21 A.M. showed a bag of pre-cubed potatoes sat on the food preparation table. There were multiple areas of greenish-gray spots on the cubed potatoes with white fuzz around the greenish-gray areas. Observation on 8/19/19 at 11:44 A.M. showed Dietary Staff X cut open the bag of pre-cubed potatoes and dumped the entire bag into a metal pan and set the pan on the preparation table. Observation on 8/19/19 at 11:47 A.M. showed Dietary Staff N picked up the pan of potatoes, added cold water to the pan, and set them on the counter near the oven. During interview on 8/19/19 at 11:55 A.M.,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2019-08-22 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility staff failed to create an environment that was respectful of the rights of each resident to make choices about aspects of their lives that were significant to the resident when the facility removed partial side rails from the residents' beds which the residents used as assistive devices while in their beds for two residents (Residents #16 and #43), in a review of 15 sampled residents, and for one additional resident (Residents #58). The facility also failed to evaluate residents' preferences for time to awaken for three residents (Residents #19, #21, and #57) and for four additional residents (Residents #56, #9, #52, and #32). The facility census was 58. 1. Review of the facility policy Proper Use of Beds and Bed Mobility Systems, dated 4/2018, showed the following: -Purpose: The purpose of these guidelines is to ensure the safe use of all beds and bed mobility systems as resident mobility aids; -Mobility Systems are defined as any mechanical,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2019-08-22 · tag F0570 — pattern
    Assure the security of all personal funds of residents deposited with the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain a surety bond sufficient (an amount equal to at least one and one half times the average monthly balance of the resident's personal funds), to ensure protection of the resident funds. The facility census was 58. 1. Review of the facility Resident Personal Trust Funds Policy & Procedures dated 1/2018 showed the following: -Policy specifications: To establish guidelines and maintain a system for protecting resident funds which assures a full and separate accounting, according to generally accepted accounting principles, of each resident's personal funds entrusted to the facility on the resident's behalf; Standards: 10. The Office Manager will make arrangements for an interest-bearing account which will be used for the sole purpose of resident personal funds in excess of $50.00 and will assure that such accounts remain separate from any facility operating accounts; 13. The facility shall maintain a surety bond to protect resident personal funds and the insurance certificate will be kept on file in the Administrator's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-08-22 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a comfortable homelike environment and ensure the resident dining room temperature remained between a temperature range of 71 degrees to 81 degrees Fahrenheit (F). The facility census was 58. Record review of the resident council minutes, dated 7/25/19, showed residents said the air conditioning needed adjusted in the dining room. Record review of the resident council minutes, dated 7/29/19, showed residents said the following: -The dining room was cold; -The air conditioning needed adjustment in the dining room; -Departmental response was that dietary staff was to notify maintenance about the temperatures being cold. Observation on 8/19/19 at 12:09 P.M. of the main dining room showed the following: -Eighteen residents were in the dining room eating their noon meal; -Ten residents complained the temperature in the dining room was cold; -The thermostat on the wall read 62 degrees F. Observation on 8/19/19 at 8:47 A.M. of the main dining room showed the following: -Nine residents were in the dining room…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-08-22 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow standards of practice and physician orders for two residents (Residents #7 and #36), in a review of 15 sampled residents, and for three additional residents (Residents #2, #15 and #29) when staff provided treatments without a physician's order, did not follow physician orders and did not administer a resident's gastrostomy tube (G-tube; a tube inserted into the stomach that brings nutrition/medications directly into the stomach) medication correctly. The facility census was 58. 1. Review of the facility policy Medication and Treatment Order Policy, dated 2/2018, showed the following: -A physician may write orders directly in the resident's record at the time they visit the resident or dictate the order(s) to a licensed personnel while in the facility; -Telephone and/or verbal orders taken by licensed personnel from a licensed physician must be promptly recorded on the physician's orders sheet (POS) in the resident's record by the same licensed personnel receiving the order(s). 2. Review of the undated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2019-08-22 · tag F0659 — pattern
    Provide care by qualified persons according to each resident's written plan of care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff were trained and available to provide Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) (the manual application of chest compressions and ventilations to persons in cardiac arrest, done in an effort to maintain viability until advanced help arrives) when transporting residents who requested to be full code, in the facility vehicle. Full code residents were transported by facility transporters who were not comfortable with or certified to perform CPR. The facility census was 58. 1. Review of email communication from the administrator, dated [DATE], showed the facility does not have a policy for transporters. Review of the resident list provided by the administrator showed 22 residents with full code status. During interview on [DATE] at 11:56 A.M., Transporter O said the following: -He/She transports facility residents; -He/She does not know residents' code status; -The nurse would have to tell him/her resident code status; -He/She was not currently CPR…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-08-22 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — pattern
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to turn and reposition three residents (Residents #19, #31, and #57), who were at risk for developing pressure ulcers, in a review of 15 sampled residents. The facility census was 58. 1. Review of the Nurse Assistant in a Long-Term Care Facility, Student Reference, 2001 Revision, showed the following: -A pressure ulcer is an inflammation, sore, or lesion that develops over areas where the skin and tissue underneath are injured due to a lack of blood flow and oxygen supply to an area of the body; -This lack of circulation/blood flow and oxygen supply usually happens because of continuous pressure on the skin over a bony prominence resulting from the way or length of time a resident is positioned; pressure is the main cause; -Residents prone to forming pressure ulcers include elderly residents due to sluggish circulation, poor hydration, poor nutrition, and lack of exercise/mobility; paralyzed, thin, malnourished, obese, and incontinent…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-08-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff washed their hands when indicated by professional standards of practice during personal care for two residents (Residents #16 and #19), in a review of 15 sampled residents and three additional residents (Resident #26, #41 and #55). The facility census was 58. 1. Review of the facility policy Handwashing Competency Evaluation revised 7/31/17 showed staff should wash hands before leaving the room, upon entering the room, after removing gloves, and before and after pericare. 2. Review of Resident #19's quarterly MDS dated [DATE] showed the following: -Unclear speech; -Rarely/never understood; -Severely impaired cognitive skills for daily decision making; -Required extensive assist of one for bed mobility; -Totally dependent on one staff for personal hygiene; -Totally dependent on two staff for transfers; -Always incontinent of bladder and bowel; -Diagnoses of dementia and psychotic disorder. Review of the resident's care plan…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2019-08-22 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop policies and procedures to ensure a pneumococcal vaccine program was appropriately implemented for residents, failed to assess, provide appropriate education, and vaccinate eligible residents with the pneumococcal vaccines in a timely manner as indicated by the current Centers for Disease Control (CDC) guidelines for six residents (Residents #19, #21, #31, #39, #57, and #210), in a review of 15 sampled residents. The facility census was 58. 1. Review of the facility policy Influenza and Pneumococcal Immunizations dated November 2016 showed the following: Policy: To assure that each resident receives education regarding the benefits and potential side effects before being offered influenza and pneumococcal immunizations and securing their informed consent for administration of these immunizations; Policy Specifications: 1. Each resident, or when appropriate their resident representative, will be educated regarding the benefits and potential side…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-08-22 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's choice of code status was consistent throughout one resident's (Resident #57) medical records, in a review of 15 sampled residents. The facility census was 58. 1. Review of the facility policy Advance Directives, revised December 2006, showed the following: -Policy statement: Advance directives will be respected in accordance with state law and facility policy; -Should the resident indicate he/she has issued advance directives about his/her care and treatment, documentation must be recorded in the medical record of such directive and a copy of such directive must be included in the resident's medical record. 2. Record review of Resident #57's outside the hospital do not resuscitate (OHDNR) form, dated 3/12/19, showed the resident's code status as do not resuscitate (DNR). The physician had signed the DNR order. Review of the resident's medical file showed the file contained the purple OHDNR form and a facility red page…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-08-22 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, facility staff failed to provide a copy of the transfer notice to a representative of the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman for one resident (Resident #4), who were transferred to the hospital, in a review of 15 sampled residents. The facility census was 58. 1. During interview on 8/22/19 at 6:00 P.M., the assistant director of nursing said the facility did not have a policy regarding notification of the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman regarding resident transfers and discharges from the facility. 2. Review of Resident #4's medical record showed the following: -The resident was sent from the facility to the emergency room and admitted to the hospital on [DATE]; -The resident was readmitted to the facility on [DATE]; -No documentation the facility notified the ombudsman of the resident's transfer to the hospital on 7/15/19. 3. During interview on 8/21/19 at 3:19 P.M., the Social Services Designee said the following: -She was responsible for resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-08-22 · tag F0661 — isolated
    Ensure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete a comprehensive discharge summary and recapitulation of stay for one resident (Resident #300), in a review of three closed records with only one requiring the recapitulation. The facility census was 58. 1. Review of the facility policy Discharge Summary and Plan, revised 8/2006, showed the following: Policy Interpretation and Implementation: 1. When the facility anticipates a resident's discharge to a private residence, or another nursing care facility, a discharge summary and a post-discharge plan will be developed which will assist the resident to adjust to his or her new living environment; 2. The discharge summary will include a recapitulation of the resident's stay at this facility and a final summary of the resident's status at the time of the discharge in accordance with established regulations governing release of resident information and as permitted by the resident; 3. The post-discharge plan will be developed by the Care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-08-22 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide incontinence care with a urinary catheter (a sterile tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine) consistent with acceptable standards of practice, failed to maintain the catheter bag below the level of the bladder, and failed to keep catheter tubing and drainage bag off the floor for two residents (Resident #16 and #210) in a review of 15 residents. The facility identified three residents with urinary catheters. The facility census was 58. 1. Review of the facility policy Urinary Catheter Care revised September 2005 showed the following: Purpose: The purpose of this procedure is to prevent infection of the resident's urinary tract; General guidelines: 4. The urinary drainage bag must be held or positioned lower than the bladder at all times to prevent the urine in the tubing and drainage bag from flowing back into the urinary bladder; 11. Be sure the catheter tubing and drainage bag are kept off the floor. 2. Review of the Nurse…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-08-22 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to comprehensively assess pain and provide PRN (as needed) pain medication at all, or in a timely manner, prior to dressing changes, personal cares and repositioning for one resident (Resident #210) in a review of 15 sampled residents. The resident cried out in pain during dressing changes, peri care and with position changes. The facility census was 58. 1. Review of the facility policy Pain Assessment revised 8/2008 showed the following: Purpose: the purpose of this procedure is to assess the resident's pain level and provide optimal comfort through a pain control plan which is mutually established with the resident, family and members of the health care team; General guidelines: 1. A comprehensive pain assessment will be completed as part of the initial nursing assessment with development of a pain management program as indicated; 3. Continuing assessment of pain management will occur daily and will focus on the effectiveness of the program…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-08-22 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to assess two residents' (Resident #7 and #12) dialysis arteriovenous (AV) shunt/fistula (access used to artificially connect a vein with an artery, so that a higher blood flow is created to allow blood to be pumped out of the body to an artificial kidney machine, and returned to the body by tubes that connect the patient to the machine) daily and after the resident returned from dialysis treatments in a review of 15 sampled residents. The facility census was 58. 1. Review of the facility's policy for Post Dialysis Monitoring and Observation with Implanted A-V Shunt Policy, dated January 2018 showed the following: -Policy - Charge nurse to conduct access site observations one time per day; -Procedure - The A-V access site will be monitored during rounds; -To monitor site: Check shunt area for bruit (audible vascular sound associated with turbulent blood flow) with stethoscope. Palpitation over site should reflect a thrill. Chart on medication…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-08-22 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident's (Resident #31) in a review of 15 sampled residents, medication regimen was free of unnecessary medications. The facility failed to ensure that orders for as needed (PRN) psychotropic medications were limited to 14 days as required for Resident #31, except when his/her attending physician believed it was appropriate the PRN order be extended beyond 14 days, then the physician should document their rationale in the resident's medical record and indicate the duration for the as needed order. The facility census was 58. 1. Review of the undated facility policy Psychopharmacologic Drug Use Procedure showed the following: Procedure: 6. Dose reductions must be attempted, unless medically or psychiatrically contraindicated as documented by the interdisciplinary team and/or the physician. Dose reductions will be initially considered in two separate quarters, with at least one month between the assessments, and annually thereafter: C. Response to medication reduction must be clearly documented on a routine…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-08-22 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — isolated
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure dumpsters, located next to the facility, were covered to prevent access to rodents and pests. The census was 58. Observation on 8/19/19 at 11:28 A.M. showed the facility dumpster was located outside the kitchen. The dumpster had two lids. One of the lids was open and the dumpster contained trash. Observation on 8/20/19 at 9:58 A.M. showed Dietary Staff W took the trash out from the kitchen and placed it in the open dumpster. Dietary Staff W left the dumpster open and returned to the kitchen. Observation on 8/20/19 at 4:18 P.M. showed one of the two lids to the dumpster was open and trash was visible in the dumpster. Next to the dumpster was a sign which read, CAUTION WATCH FOR WILDLIFE IN CONTAINER. Further observation showed a squirrel on top of the dumpster pulling trash out of the dumpster. During interview on 8/21/19 at 2:34 P.M., the administrator said he would expect staff to follow regulations and policy in to order to reduce the attraction of wildlife to the dumpster.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Ccited before2022-07-13 · tag F0623 — widespread
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the resident and/or the resident's representative in writing of a transfer to the hospital and the reason for the transfer for four residents (Residents #38, #46, #205, and #806), failed to notify one resident and/or the resident's representative in writing of an emergency discharge from the facility for one resident (Resident #806), and failed to notify the Ombudsman when residents were transferred and/or discharged from the facility. The facility census was 54. The facility provided a copy of the transfer/discharge form letter but no transfer/discharge or notification policy was provided. Record review of the facility's undated policy, Resident Involuntary Discharge, showed the following: -The facility will only initiate involuntary discharge proceedings when: 1. The discharge is necessary to meet the resident's welfare and the resident's welfare cannot be met in the facility. The justification must be documented in the resident record by the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2022-07-13 · tag F0625 — pattern
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a written notice of bed hold with required information to the resident and/or resident representative when the facility initiated a transfer to the hospital for three residents (Resident #38, #46, #205), in a review of 20 sampled residents. The facility census was 54. The facility did not provide a policy for bed hold notification. Review of the facility admission packet showed it contained a section regarding Bed Hold policy on page eight that read as follows: -When a private pay resident is given an order by a physician to be admitted to a hospital or to be discharged from the facility for therapeutic leave, the resident, designee or resource person will be notified concerning the transfer and the daily rate required to hold such resident's bed if resident desires to return to the same bed; -At the time of transfer, the facility will contact resident and/or authorized representative to execute an acknowledgement stating whether or not such resident desires to exercise his or her right to a bed hold; -The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$364,413 in federal fines across 8 penalties. 2 Medicare payment denials on record.

  • $137,652 — penalty dated 2026-05-19
  • $86,190 — penalty dated 2025-12-15
  • $41,659 — penalty dated 2025-08-07
  • $12,425 — penalty dated 2025-05-02
  • $9,032 — penalty dated 2024-02-06
  • $73,593 — penalty dated 2023-10-03
  • $2,098 — penalty dated 2023-08-28
  • $1,764 — penalty dated 2023-08-21
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-06-06 for 6 days
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2023-11-16 for 29 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to TUTERA SENIOR LIVING & HEALTH CARE — 25 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 52.0-1.0 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.2-1.2 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 51.7-0.7 vs chain
Quality measures 2 of 53.0-1.0 vs chain
The other 24 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.0★, per CMS)
1 of 5Bethany Rehab & HccDekalb, IL 1 of 5Carlinville Rehab & HccCarlinville, IL 1 of 5Coulterville Rehab & HccCoulterville, IL 1 of 5Crystal Pines Rehab & HccCrystal Lake, IL 1 of 5Fair Oaks Rehab & HealthcareSouth Beloit, IL 1 of 5Grand Meadows Senior Living & Health CareAsbury, IA 1 of 5Hillsboro Rehab & HccHillsboro, IL 1 of 5Mattoon Rehab & HccMattoon, IL 1 of 5Metropolis Rehab & HccMetropolis, IL 1 of 5Moweaqua Rehab & HccMoweaqua, IL 1 of 5St Paul's Senior CommunityBelleville, IL 2 of 5The Village At MissionPrairie Village, KS 2 of 5Westview Of Derby Rehabilitation & Health Care CenDerby, KS 3 of 5Carnegie Village Rehabilitation & Health Care CentBelton, MO 3 of 5Dixon Rehab & HccDixon, IL 3 of 5Highland Rehabilitation & Health Care CenterKansas City, MO 3 of 5Lakeland Rehab & Healthcare CenterEffingham, IL 3 of 5Meridian Rehabilitation And Health Care CenterWichita, KS 3 of 5Monterey Park Rehabilitation & Health Care CenterIndependence, MO 3 of 5NorterreLiberty, MO 3 of 5Northland Rehabilitation & Health Care CenterKansas City, MO 3 of 5Stratford Commons Rehab & Health Care CenterOverland Park, KS 3 of 5Tiffany Springs Rehabilitation & Health Care CenteKansas City, MO 5 of 5Charlton Place Rehab And Healthcare CenterDeatsville, AL

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
JOSEPH CHARLES TUTERA 2013 FAMILY IRREVOCIABLE TRUST AGREEMENTOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST13%since 08/01/2023
MARIAN OLANDER TUTERA 2020 MRTL TROrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST6%since 08/01/2023
ST CHARLES HOLDCO HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST20%since 08/01/2023
BROOKS, KILEYIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 08/01/2023
TUTERA, JOSEPHIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 08/01/2023
WALNUT CREEK MANAGEMENT COMPANY LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 08/01/2023

CMS files one row per role, so the 7 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$3.4M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-104.3%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$252K
Related-party expense4% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 62%Medicare 4%Other / private 34%

This home reported $252K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$561per resident / day
operating cost
$17,062per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$275per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MO

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Missouri Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Missouri
$6,741/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$7,604/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,400/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 265518. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-03-21, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next