No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Meridian Rehabilitation And Health Care Center

1555 N Meridian Street, Wichita, KS 67203 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 106 certified beds · (316) 942-8471 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (316) 942-8471 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Aug 2024Resident-funds citation (F0565)Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0744)1 actual-harm citation4 immediate-jeopardy citations CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)$46,483 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Aug 2024
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation
  • inspectors recorded 4 serious findings as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (62) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $46,483 in federal fines (most recent 2024-08-05)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★ 2/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
1919 N Amidon Ave Ste 100 · (316) 866-2000 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
1919 N Amidon St · (316) 295-4721 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
3020 W 13th St N · (316) 358-9744 · Call to confirm hours
Park
3637 W 15th St N · (316) 268-4361 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
1501 N Meridian Ave · (316) 204-6576

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased6.7%17.9%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight4.3%4.9%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.2%1.6%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%2.9%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms10.1%6.5%6.5%worse
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury4.6%4.3%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened6.8%16.2%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication15.2%23.2%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine93.8%95.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.6%4.4%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control12.4%22.6%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table20.2%18.1%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.9%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine82.3%73.8%79.4%typical

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

0.13U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.07hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.05hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.13 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 9% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 1% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified95.7%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.931.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.42
RN hours/ resident / day
0.83
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.03
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.29
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.20
RN hoursweekends
41.9%
Total nursing turnover
12.5%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 106 beds and averages 98.9 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 7 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.29 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.42 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.03 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.91 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.44 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.51 to 0.20 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 42% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

14
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-04-29)
20
at the previous standard inspection (2024-08-05)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

62 citations, most serious first. The 15 most serious are shown; the remaining 47 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-08-05 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 96 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prevent the neglect of cognitively impaired Resident (R)53, who had mental health disorder diagnoses, anger related to living in the facility, and a history of exit seeking, and the facility staff did not respond to his suicidal ideation statements after his elopement (when a cognitively impaired resident leaves the facility without the knowledge or supervision of staff). On [DATE], R53 eloped from the facility. When staff returned R53 to the facility, they placed a Wander Guard (a bracelet that sets off an alarm when residents wearing one attempt to exit the building without an escort) on R53, and he reported he would never eat again. On [DATE] at 04:00 PM, R53 made statements such as give me a gun so I can shoot myself. At 10:00 PM, the resident reported he was being held against his wishes. On [DATE] at 11:30 AM, R53 reported he would not eat until someone came back to talk about him…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-08-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 96 residents and the facility identified five residents at risk for elopement. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to cognitively impaired, independently mobile Resident (R)53, identified as a high risk for elopement. On 06/29/24 at approximately 07:15 AM, staff were unable to locate R53 in the facility. On 06/29/24 at approximately 08:30 AM, staff located R53 approximately two miles away from the facility. R53 walked down busy residential areas with a 35 mile per hour speed limit and would have crossed 20 cross walks and crossed over two river bridges. This deficient practice placed R53 in immediate jeopardy. Furthermore, the facility failed to keep R54 safe, related to fall hazards in R54's room. Findings included: - Review of the Electronic Health Record (EHR) documented R53 had diagnoses, which included dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion), bipolar (major mental illness that caused people to have episodes of severe high and low…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Immediate jeopardy · J2024-08-05 · tag F0742 — isolated
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with mental disorder or psychosocial adjustment difficulty, or who has a history of trauma and/or post-traumatic stress disorder.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 96 residents. The sample included 20 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the appropriate treatment and services to attain the highest practicable mental and psychosocial well-being of cognitively impaired Resident (R)53, who had a mental health disorder diagnoses, portrayed anger related to living in the facility, a history of exit seeking, and the facility staff did not respond to his suicidal ideation statements after his elopement (when a cognitively impaired resident leaves the facility without the knowledge or supervision of staff). On [DATE], R53 eloped from the facility. When staff returned R53 to the facility they placed a WanderGuard (a bracelet that sets off an alarm when residents wearing one attempt to exit the building without an escort) on R53, and he reported he would never eat again. On [DATE] at 04:00 PM, R53 made statements such as give me a gun so I can shoot myself. At 10:00 PM, the resident reported he…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2023-08-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 88 residents, with 11 residents included in the sample and one resident identified as at risk for elopement. Based on interview, observation, and record review the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to prevent an elopement for cognitively impaired, independently mobile Resident (R)1, who was at risk for elopement and had a prior history of elopement. R1 left the facility, without staff knowledge or supervision at approximately 03:45 PM on 07/27/23. R1 walked 0.8 miles, in 100 degrees Fahrenheit (F) temperature, on uneven roads with no sidewalks available, and speed limits in the residential area were 30 miles per hour. R1 was outside of the facility for approximately one hour and returned to the facility around 04:50 PM, after a residential neighbor alerted the facility of a potential resident outside. This deficient practice placed the resident in immediate jeopardy. Findings included: - The Physicians Order dated 06/27/23 revealed the resident had diagnoses that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2022-12-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 92 residents. The sample included 22 residents, with six reviewed for accidents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to prevent a fall for Resident (R) 35, who fell from her wheelchair due to non-functioning brakes, and obtained a femur fracture (broken thigh bone). The facility further failed to assess R33, who was a fall risk, for the use of side rails. This placed the residents at risk for injury. Findings included: - The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented R35 had diagnoses of hypertension (high blood pressure), dementia with behavioral disturbance (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion), glaucoma (abnormal condition of elevated pressure within an eye caused by obstruction to the outflow), unsteadiness on feet, and peripheral neuropathy (weakness and numbness in the hands and feet). The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R35 had moderately impaired cognition with a Brief Interview…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-04-29 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to prepare and serve food under sanitary conditions, to the residents of the facility appropriately to prevent the potential for food borne bacteria.Findings included: - During an initial tour of the kitchen on 04/27/26 at 08:57 AM, the following areas of concern were noted:The three-door reach-in freezer contained food debris on the bottom shelf.The three-door reach-in refrigerator had an unknown spilled liquid on the bottom shelf.The drain to the ice machine lacked a two-inch air gap.Two black two-tiered plastic carts, used to store clean dishes, had food debris on the bottom tier.The bottom shelf of the steamtable, used to store plate covers, had a build-up of food debris.On 04/28/26 at 01:57 PM, Dietary Staff BB confirmed the noted areas were in need of cleaning. The facility did not have a cleaning schedule or a policy regarding kitchen cleanliness.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-04-29 · tag F0636 — pattern
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure comprehensive assessments were fully completed when staff failed to complete Care Area Assessments (CAA) that addressed the individual underlying causes, contributing factors and risk factors for Resident (R) 1, R2, R3, R4, R5, R7, R9, R10, R12, R15, R22, R28, R61, R71 R91, R98.Findings included:- R1's Electronic Health Record (EHR) recorded an Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], which trigged the Mood/Behavior, Functional Abilities/ Dementia/Cognition Loss the CAA. The CAA's lacked analysis of the findings.R2's EHR recorded a Significant Change MDS, dated 10/14/25, which triggered the Cognitive Loss/Dementia and Urinary Incontinence/Indwelling Catheter. The CAA lacked an analysis of the findings.R3's EHR recorded a Significant Change MDS, dated 09/17/25, which triggered the Cognitive Loss/Dementia, Communication, Functional Abilities, Urinary Incontinence/Indwelling Catheter, Nutritional Status, Dental Care, Pressure Ulcer, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-29 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide Resident (R)2 with a dignified existence by allowing his leg urinary catheter bag to remain on his lower leg, without a dignity bag or cover. Findings included:- R2's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses which included: calculus in bladder (a hardened mass of minerals that forms within the urinary bladder when urine becomes highly concentrated or remains in the bladder for too long) and dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion). R2's inaccurate Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented he had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of one, indicating severe cognitive impairment. He was dependent on staff for toileting hygiene, had an indwelling urinary catheter (a tube inserted into the bladder to drain the urine into a collection bag), and was always incontinent of urine. R2's Urinary Incontinence and Indwelling Catheter Care Area…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-29 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — isolated
    Allow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received the opportunity to participate in the care planning process when staff failed to invite Residents (R) 10 and R11 or their responsible party to care plan meetings. Findings included:1. R10's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) recorded a admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated 01/14/26 and a Significant Change MDS dated 03/20/26, which documented a Brief Interview of Mental Status BIMS score of 12, indicating moderately impaired cognition. R10's EMR lacked documentation of a care plan meeting conducted in the past four months.On 04/27/26 at 09:28 AM, R10 reported she was not invited to any care plan meeting.2. R11's EMR recorded an admission MDS dated 02/20/26 and a Quarterly MDS dated 03/18/26, which documented a BIMS score of 14 indicating intact cognition. R11's EMR lacked documentation of a care plan meeting conducted in the past two months.On 04/27/26 at 12:10 PM, R11 reported she was not invited to any care plan meeting.On 04/29/26 at 10:36 AM, Administrative Nurse F reported residents and or the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-29 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 100's call light was within her reach. Findings included: - R100's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented a diagnosis of clostridium difficile (C-diff: contagious bacteria characterized by foul-smelling frequent loose bowel movements) and congestive heart failure (CHF-a condition with low heart output and the body becomes congested with fluid).R100's Entry Minimum Data Set was completed on 04/22/26 on her admission date. R100's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented that it was in progress. No information was available.R100's Base Line Care Plan, dated 04/23/26, documented staff to evaluate for change in level of consciousness. The base line care plan lacked documentation for a call light. On 04/28/26 at 08:06 AM, R100's door was closed to her room, and she could be heard yelling loudly for help several times. Licensed Nurse (LN) H asked if that was R100 yelling and donned his gown, mask, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-29 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment in Resident (R) 87's bathroom.Findings Included:- On 04/27/2026 at 11:41 AM, an environmental tour with Maintenance Staff UU revealed the following concerns in R87's bathroom and handwashing area:Approximate four-foot section of loose baseboard to the left of and behind the toilet. Black substance on the wall and floor behind the loose baseboard to the left of and behind the toilet.Approximate three-inch crack in the toilet seat.Empty Hand Soap dispenser hanging from the wall above the handwashing sink with exposed lag bolt fasteners.On 04/27/2026 at 11:41 AM, Maintenance Staff UU confirmed the above findings and stated the soap dispenser did not work. Maintenance staff UU confirmed the toilet seat should be replaced, the bathroom baseboard removed, the black substance tested for mold, and the sheetrock removed and replaced. Additionally, he stated the hand soap dispenser was mounted with lag bolts over a stud and not in the sheet rock as it…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-29 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to accurately complete assessments to reflect the resident's status for four residents: Resident (R) 2 related to incontinence of urine and dependence on the staff for activities of daily living (ADL), R3 related to restraints, R9 related to falls, and R10 related to Hospice services.Findings included:- R2's undated Physician Orders, documented pertinent diagnoses which included dementia.R2's 10/14/25 Significant Change in Status Minimum Data Set (MDS) documented Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 1, indicating severe cognitive impairment. He had no impairment in functional limitation in range of motion. He was independent with eating and upper body dressing and used a walker and wheelchair (w/c) as mobility devices. R2 had an Indwelling catheter and coded as always incontinent of bladder.R2's 04/07/26 Quarterly MDS documented no changes in the assessment from above.Review of the EMR from 03/30/26 through 04/27/26 revealed no…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-29 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a summary of the baseline care plan to Resident (R) 100. Findings included:- R100's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented a diagnosis of clostridium difficile (C-diff: contagious bacteria characterized by foul-smelling frequent loose bowel movements) and congestive heart failure (CHF-a condition with low heart output and the body becomes congested with fluid).R100's Entry Minimum Data Set was completed on 04/22/26 on her admission date.R100's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented it was in progress. No information was available.R100's Base Line Care Plan, dated 04/23/26, documented contact precautions. Staff were educated to wear gowns and masks when changing contaminated linens, place soiled linens in bags marked biohazard, and bag the linens and close the bag tightly before taking it to laundry.On 04/27/26 at 10:10 AM, R100 reported she did not know what a base line care plan was.On 04/28/26 at 08:06…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-29 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide appropriate activity of daily living (ADL) assistance to Resident (R)2 regarding changing clothing.Findings included:- R2's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented a diagnosis of dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion).R2's Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of one, indicating severe cognitive impairment. The MDS inaccurately documented that he required setup assistance with lower body dressing.R2's Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Care Area Assessment (CAA), dated 10/14/25, did not trigger.R2's Quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], documented the resident had a BIMS score of one, indicating severe cognitive impairment. The MDS inaccurately documented that he required setup assistance with lower body dressing.R2's Care Plan, revised 03/23/26, inaccurately instructed staff that the resident was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-29 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prevent the development of and promote the healing of pressure ulcers when staff failed to ensure R101 received necessary interventions including a low air loss mattress, heels were offloaded, and a consistent repositioning plan. Findings included: - R101's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed diagnoses of incomplete quadriplegia (spinal cord injury occurring at the neck where the cord is not fully severed, leaving some sensory or motor function below the injury level), limited mobility, and muscle weakness.R101's 03/11/25 admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating intact cognition. R101's MDS documented no behaviors or refusals of care, and he required maximal assistance with activities of daily living (ADL) including bed mobility to roll left and right. The MDS recorded he had a Stage 2 (partial-thickness skin loss into but no deeper than the dermis including intact…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 47 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure an environment free from accident hazards when staff failed to utilize appropriate foot pedals when propelling Resident (R) 2 in his wheelchair causing his feet to not remain safely on the foot pedals during transportation.Findings included:- R2's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented a diagnosis of dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion).R2's inaccurate Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented he had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of one, indicating severe cognitive impairment. The MDS noted R2 was independent with walking with the use of a walker and/or wheelchair.The Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Care Area Assessment (CAA), dated 10/14/25, did not trigger.R2's inaccurate Quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], documented he had a BIMS score of one. The MDS noted R2 was independent with walking with the use of a walker and/or wheelchair.R2's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-29 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Residents (R)28 remained free from unnecessary medications when staff failed to administer as needed (PRN) bowel medication for constipation.Findings included:- R28's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented a diagnosis of constipation (difficulty passing stools).R28's Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented he had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11, indicating moderately impaired cognition. The MDS noted he was always incontinent of bowel and had no constipation.R28's Urinary Incontinence/Indwelling Catheter Care Area Assessment (CAA), dated 12/16/25, triggered but lacked an analysis of findings.R28's Quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], documented he had a BIMS score of 11, indicating moderately impaired cognition. The MDS noted he was always incontinent with his bowel.R28's Care Plan, revised 02/23/26, documented R28 had episodes of bowel incontinence and instructed staff to use disposable…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-02 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — pattern
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 96 residents with seven residents reviewed for abuse, neglect, exploitation and/or misappropriation of resident property. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to send completed investigation reports to the State Agency (SA) within five working days of the alleged incident(s) as required. Findings included: - Review of the facility's notifications to the SA revealed the following:On 04/08/25 incident number 1542136 was reported to the SA. The completed investigation was not submitted within the required five working days nor provided to the surveyor during an on-site visit on 02/02/26.On 07/28/25, incident number 2573926 was reported to the SA. The completed investigation was not submitted within the five working days but was provided to the surveyor during an on-site visit on 02/02/26.On 08/26/25, incident number 2600412 was reported to the SA. The completed investigation was not submitted within the five working days but was provided to the surveyor during an on-site visit on 02/02/26.On 09/02/25, incident number…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-08-05 · tag F0730 — widespread
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 96 residents. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide direct care staff annual evaluations/performance reviews for five of the five certified nursing assistants sampled, to determine strengths and weaknesses in providing resident care. Findings included: - Review of five Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) personnel files revealed the following: Review of CNA UU, with hire date of 05/29/19, revealed the lack of an annual review. Review of CNA VV, with hire date of 11/09/21, revealed the lack of an annual review. Review of CNA S, with hire date of 01/12/22, revealed the lack of an annual review. Review of CNA PP, with hire date of 11/16/21, revealed the lack of an annual review. Review of CNA T, with hire date of 12/09/19, revealed the lack of an annual review. On 08/01/24 at 02:25 PM, Administrative staff B reported employee annual reviews should be completed by the Director of nursing. On 08/05/24 at 10:36 AM, Administrative Nurse D reported she thought the Administrator was to complete staff annual reviews. She was not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-08-05 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — widespread
    Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 96 residents. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop, implement, and maintain an in-service training program to ensure staff completed the required 12-hour in-service education for five of the five Certified Nurse Assistants (CNA) sampled, who were employed by the facility for at least one year. This deficient practice placed the residents at risk of decreased quality of care. Findings included: - Review of five Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) personnel files and in-service training revealed the following: Review of CNA UU, with hire date of 05/29/19, lacked 12 hours of in-service education. Review of CNA VV, with hire date of 11/09/21, lacked 12 hours of in-service education. Review of CNA S, with hire date of 01/12/22, lacked 12 hours of in-service education. Review of CNA PP, with hire date of 11/16/21, lacked 12 hours of in-service education. Review of CNA T, with hire date of 12/09/19, lacked 12 hours of in-service education, as CNA T received 0.5 hour. On 08/05/24 at 10:36 AM, Administrative Nurse D reported she…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-08-05 · tag F0949 — failed to train staff on dementia and abuse — widespread
    Provide behavior health training consistent with the requirements and as determined by a facility assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 96 residents. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop, implement, and maintain an effective training program for all staff, which included, at a minimum, training on behavioral health care and services that was appropriate and effective. This failure placed all 96 residents at risk of not reaching their highest practicable well-being. Findings included: - Review of five Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) personnel files and Course Completion History (computer training) revealed the following: Review of CNA UU, with hire date of 05/29/19, lacked behavioral training. The Alzheimer's Disease and Related Disorders: Behaviors module not started and was due by 04/30/23. No course listed the module for 2024. The Behavioral Health module, not started and was due by 01/31/23, and no course listed for the module in 2024. Review of CNA VV, with hire date of 11/09/21, the Behavioral Health was not started and was due by 01/31/24. Review of CNA S, with hire date of 01/12/22, lacked behavioral health training. The Alzheimer's Disease…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-08-05 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY - The Physician Orders dated 04/01/24 revealed the following diagnoses for Resident (R) 81 had diagnoes that included diabetes mellitus (when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin made, or the body cannot respond to the insulin) and end stage renal disease (a terminal disease because of irreversible damage to vital tissues or organs). The Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, indicating intact cognition. Review of the functional abilities and goals indicated R 81 required substantial/maximal assistance with bathing. The Quarterly MDS dated 06/12/24 revealed no changes in memory or abilities. Review of the Care Plan dated 05/07/23 regarding Care/Activities of daily living (ADL) preferences indicated R 81 preferred a shower two times a week as tolerated, revised on 12/02/23. The care plan lacked which days/time R81 preferred to have her bath completed per her choice. Review of the bathing sheets for May 2024, indicated R81…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-05 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 96 residents which included 28 residents that smoked. The facility Identified three designated smoking areas of the facility. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for 28 residents that smoked in three of the three designated smoking areas and the service hallway the residents had travel through to the southeast smoking area that was in need of cleaning and/or repairs. Findings Included: - On 07/30/24 at 08:00 AM, on entrance to the facility at the Northeast entrance, noted a stale musty odor prevalent odor throughout the facility during the initial tour. On 07/30/24 at 10:10 AM, Resident (R)54 and R 26, residents of the men's memory care unit (400 hall), were observed smoking on the courtyard adjacent to the locked unit. This area was a designated smoking area which accommodated four residents on the men's memory care unit that smoked. in the facility. Observations revealed the cigarette ashtray/tower was bent over and cracked. There were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-05 · tag F0641 — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 96 residents with 20 residents selected for review. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to accurately complete the Minimum Data Set (MDS) for five of the sampled residents. Resident (R) 28 and R(47) related inaccurate documentation of medications. R (41), R(54) and R(82) related inaccurate documentation on falls. These deficient practices had the potential to lead to uncommunicated need for care and services to meet each individual resident's needs. Findings included: - Review of Resident (R) 28's electronic medical record (EMR), revealed a diagnosis of type II diabetes mellitus (DM- when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin made, or the body cannot respond to the insulin). The Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11, indicating moderate cognitive impairment. He received hypoglycemic medication (a group of drugs used to help reduce…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-05 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 96 residents. The sample of 20 residents included four dependent residents sampled for choices/preferences related to bathing, and two residents reviewed for accident/falls. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to review and revise the care plan for four Residents (R)92, R73, R 74, R 81 related to bathing preferences/choices and R 54 and R 41 related to accidents/falls to prevent further falls. Findings included: - Review of Resident (R) 92's undated Physician's Orders, documentation included diagnoses of Spastic hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body), hemiparesis (muscular weakness of one half of the body) affecting left dominate side, and memory deficit following cerebral infarction (stroke - sudden death of brain cells due to lack of oxygen caused by impaired blood flow to the brain by blockage or rupture of an artery to the brain). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-05 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 96 residents. The sample of 20 residents included five dependent residents sampled for personal hygiene related to bathing, nail care, hair trimming, and facial hair. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure necessary services to maintain good personal hygiene for Resident (R)92, 73, 74, 81, and R 82 related to bathing, nail care, hair care and/ or unwanted facial hair. Findings included: - Review of Resident (R) 92's undated Physician's Orders, documentation included diagnoses of spastic hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body) and hemiparesis (muscular weakness of one half of the body) affecting left dominate side, and memory deficit following cerebral infarction (stroke - sudden death of brain cells due to lack of oxygen caused by impaired blood flow to the brain by blockage or rupture of an artery to the brain). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-08-05 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 96 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to serve food that is palatable, and at a safe and appetizing temperature for the residents of the facility. Findings included: - On 07/30/24 at 07:45 AM, during entrance tour of the facility, observation revealed open metal carts with 10 plus meal trays being served on each of the five units. The plate lacked insulated covers, nor served in closed insulated food service cart. Staff observed serving and setting up individual trays off the open cart one at a time while the remaining meals trays remained in the hallway on the open carts. During resident screening, residents shared concerns related to food which included: 1. On 07/30/24 at 09:58 AM, Resident (R)73, reported sometimes is meal is served an hour late and when he got his meal, the temperature of the food is not good. The food that is supposed to be cold is warm, and the hot foods are cold. 2. On 07/30/24 at 12:16 PM, R 68 reported the food is not acceptable. it is rough, the quality of the food, they…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-08-05 · tag F0923 — pattern
    Have enough outside ventilation via a window or mechanical ventilation, or both.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 96 residents. Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide adequate ventilation in the beauty shop. The facility lacked ventilation to the outside by means of a window, mechanical vent or the combination of to promote good air circulation, as required. Findings included: - On 8/05/24 at 08:00 AM during the initial tour of the facility an assessment of the beauty shop ventilation system revealed the facility lacked an outside ventilation, as required. On 08/05/24 at 08:15 AM, Interview with Administrative Staff A revealed the beautician did not do any certain treatments like perms or bleaching in the beauty shop, so an exhaust fan is not needed. The facility failed to provide a policy regarding beauty shop ventilation as requested on 08/05/24. The facility failed to provide adequate ventilation in the beauty shop to promote good air circulation, as required.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-05 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — isolated
    Allow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 96 residents, that included 20 residents included in the sample. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to include Resident (R)61 in the development and planning of the resident's care plan quarterly, which placed R81 at risk of impaired care and autonomy. Findings included: - Resident (R)61's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnosis that included acute kidney failure, Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV is a virus that attacks cells that help the body fight infection, making a person more vulnerable to other infections and diseases) and muscle weakness. The admission Minimum Data Set(MDS) dated [DATE], documented R61 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating intact cognition. R61 had verbal behavioral symptoms four to six days, but less than daily during the look-back period. It was somewhat important to have family, or a close friend involved in discussions about his care. He required staff assistance with activities of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-05 · tag F0557 — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 96 residents. The sample included 20 residents with four residents selected for review related to resident rights to retain and use of their personal possessions. Based on observation, interview , and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident right to retain and use her personal possessions for Resident (R)63 related to her motorized wheelchair and R 54's missing coat. Findings included: - Review of Resident (R)63's Physician Orders, dated 07/09/24 documentation included diagnoses of diabetes (when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin made or the body cannot respond to the insulin), cellulitis (skin infection) of left lower limb, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, (COPD- progressive and irreversible condition characterized by diminished lung capacity and difficulty or discomfort in breathing), anxiety disorder (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty and irrational fear), depressive disorder (a mood disorder that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-05 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 96 residents with three residents reviewed for Medicare Advance Beneficiary and Medicare Non-Coverage Notices. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to notify one resident, Resident (R)22, ABN (provides information to beneficiaries so that they can decide if they wish to continue receiving the skilled services that may not be paid for by Medicare and assume financial responsibility before the end of a Medicare covered Party), or a NOMNC (a form given to all Medicare beneficiaries at least two days before the end of a Medicare covered part A stay or when all of Part B therapies are ending), as required. Findings included: - On 07/30/24, Administrative staff A provided a list of discharged Medicare A residents with three residents chosen for review. One Resident, (R)22, identified as discharged from Part A services on 03/23/24, lacked a NOMNC or ABN completed when Medicare Part A services were terminated to let the resident know how many days of the 100 days available remained. The skilled nursing facility (SNF) Beneficiary…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-05 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility had a census of 96 residents. The sample included 20 residents. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide consistent activities for two residents. Resident (R)41 and R82 were observed not to have received activities on the Memory Care Unit. This deficient practice placed the residents at risk for complications related to decreased psychosocial wellbeing. Findings included: - The 04/14/24 Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 00, which indicated severely impaired cognition. R41 had a total mood severity score of 00, indicating no depression and there were no behaviors documented. R41 required maximal assistance with activities of daily living, which included toileting, dressing, and bathing. R41 was frequently incontinent of bladder. The resident had no falls. R41 stated it was very important to do her favorite activities in section F activity interview. The Cognition Loss/Dementia Care Area Assessment (CAA) dated 04/14/24, documented R41 was alert with impaired memory…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-05 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 96 residents with 20 residents in the sample, that included one resident reviewed for dialysis (procedure where impurities or waste were removed from the blood). Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff obtained vital signs or the dialysis site after Resident (R)81 received dialysis (procedure where impurities or waste were removed from the blood). Findings include: - The Physician Orders dated 04/01/24 revealed the following diagnosis for Resident (R) 81 diabetes mellitus (when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin made, or the body cannot respond to the insulin) end stage renal disease (a terminal disease because of irreversible damage to vital tissues or organs). The Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, indicating intact cognition. Review of the functional abilities and goals indicated R 81 required substantial/maximal assistance…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-05 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 96 residents, that included 20 residents included in the sample. The sample included six residents for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R)61's medication was available for administration without missed doses. This deficient practice placed R61 at risk of unnecessary complications from not receiving his medication, as ordered by the physician. Findings included: - Resident (R)61's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnosis that included Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV is a virus that attacks cells that help the body fight infection, making a person more vulnerable to other infections and diseases). The admission Minimum Data Set(MDS) dated [DATE], documented R61 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating intact cognition. The care plan, revised on 01/04/24, documented staff were to administer HIV medications as ordered. The physician's orders included…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-05 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility had a census of 96 residents. The sample included 20 residents. Based on observations, interview and record review, the facility failed to honor a food preference for Resident (R)41. Staff served R 41 pork when documented on her meal ticked as no pork. This deficient practice placed the resident at risk for inadequate care and services. Findings included: - The 04/14/24 Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 00, which indicated severely impaired cognition. R41 had a total mood severity score of 00, indicating no depression and there were no behaviors documented. R41 required staff to set-up her meals. The Cognition Loss/Dementia Care Area Assessment (CAA) dated 04/14/24, documented R41 alert with impaired memory function. Staff to proceed to care plan with continued assistance with daily decisions and tasks to avoid complications and minimize risks. The Care Plan dated 07/15/24, documented no pork products or shellfish per R41's preference. The Physician's Order documented regular diet, no pork or shellfish…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2022-12-13 · tag F0801 — widespread
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility had a census of 92 residents. The sample included 22 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to employ a full time Certified Dietary Manager for the 92 residents who resided in the facility and received their meals from one of one kitchen, which placed the residents at risk not to receive adequate nutrition. Findings included: - On 12/07/22 at 08:35 AM, observation revealed dietary staff cooked and served breakfast. The kitchen staff reported the Dietary Manager was not been present in the kitchen at that time. On 12/12/22 at 01:09 PM, observation revealed Dietary Staff (DS) BB in the kitchen assisting with preparation and serving the midday meal. DS BB verified he was the Dietary Manager; he had enrolled in a Certified Dietary Manager course, but had not completed the Certified Dietary Manager course as of that time. Upon request the facility failed to provide a policy of Certified Dietary Manager. The facility failed to employ a full time Certified Dietary Manager for 92 residents who resided in the facility which placed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-12-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility had a census of 92 residents. The sample included 22 residents. Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to store, prepare, and serve food under sanitary conditions for meals prepared in the facility's kitchen, which placed the residents at risk of consuming contaminated food. Finding included: - On 10/07/22 at 08:35 AM, observation revealed Dietary Staff (DS) CC present in the kitchen. DS CC had two to three inches of facial hair not contained in a beard guard. DS CC confirmed he had been cooking and serving meals. On 12/12/22 at 01:09 PM observations made during the midday meal preparation and serving revealed: A staff member' s soda can sat on a food prep table across from the three-compartment sink. The three-compartment sink had brown tarry/sticky substance on the plastic plumbing pipes underneath with a clear plastic square full of cloudy water. The three-compartment sink sanitation testing strips had an expiration date of 05/15/22. The floor under the stove/grill lacked floor tile with unfinished floor exposed. The exhaust hood…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2022-12-13 · tag F0868 — widespread
    Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility had a census of 92 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to maintain an effective quality assessment and assurance (QAA) program to develop corrective actions plans and monitor them to correct identified quality deficiencies prior to survey. This deficient practice placed the residents at risk for ineffective care. Findings included: - The facility failed to address repeated concerns in resident council. (Refer to F565) The facility failed to provide a clean, sanitary environment for one of five units in the facility. (Refer to F584) The facility failed to prevent incidents of neglect and resident-to-resident abuse. (Refer to F600) The facility failed to identify and report incidents of resident-to-resident abuse to the State Agency (Refer to F609) The facility failed to investigate incidents of resident-to-resident abuse. (Refer to F610) The facility failed to provide bed hold notification with hospitalization. (Refer to F625) The facility failed to provide consistent assistance for bathing. (Refer to F677) The facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2022-12-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility had a census of 92 residents. The sample included 22 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to adhere to infection control practices for COVID-19 (a virus which is characterized mainly by fever and cough, and is capable of progressing to severe symptoms and in some cases causes death especially in older people, and those with underlying health conditions) droplet isolation precautions which placed the residents who resided in the facility at increased risk for contracting COVID-19 infection and failed to implement a water management program for the Legionella disease (Legionella is a bacterium spread through mist, such as from air-conditioning units for large buildings. Adults over the age of 50 and people with weak immune systems, chronic lung disease or heavy tobacco use are most at risk of developing a pneumonia caused by Legionella). This placed the residents in the facility at risk for infectious disease. Findings Included: - On 12/12/22 at 07:57 AM, observation revealed the facility main entry door with a posted sign of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-12-13 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility had a census of 92 residents. The sample included 22 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to act promptly upon the concerns of the resident council group concerning issues of care and life in the facility. This placed the residents at risk of decreased quality of care and services. Findings included: - Review of the monthly Resident Council meeting recorded the following: On 12/28/21 the resident council minutes recorded 11 residents in attendance with concerns that hand towels and washcloths were not being passed to the residents and the bed linens not changed. On 01/27/22 the resident minute council minutes recorded 13 residents in attendance with concerns that hand towels and washcloths were not being passed out, beds were not made, and residents were not getting clean ice cups or ice. On 02/15/22 the resident council minutes recorded seven residents in attendance with concerns the residents were only getting ice water once a day or not at all, call lights were not getting answered and staff were reporting they were busy,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-12-13 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility had a census of 92 residents. Thirteen residents resided on the secured female memory care unit. Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to provide housekeeping services to maintain a sanitary and homelike environment for the 13 residents who reside on the memory care unit. This placed the residents at risk for reduced quality of life. Findings included: - On 12/07/22 at 08:29 AM, observation revealed an intense urine odor permeated the seven resident rooms, hall, and dining room on the female memory care unit. Continued observation revealed five residents eating breakfast in the dining room, and the urine odor completely obscured the food aroma. On 12/07/22 at 11:49 AM, observation revealed an intense urine odor continued to permeate the seven resident rooms, hall, and dining room on the female memory care unit. Observation revealed 12 residents eating lunch in the dining room, and the urine odor completely obscured the food aroma. On 12/07/22 at 11:49 AM, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) Q stated she was aware of the urine odor, not sure what…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-12-13 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility had a census of 92 residents. The sample included 22 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to monitor medication room refrigerator temperatures of one of two medication rooms, and lock one of five medication carts which placed residents at risk receiving ineffective medication stored in the medication room refrigerator and leave an unattended, unlocked medication cart which placed residents at risk of unintended ingestion/loss of medications. Findings included: - On 12/07/22 at 08:31 AM during initial tour of the medication room located behind the nurse's station near the entrance of the facility, observation revealed a small black refrigerator with a September 2022 temperature log with five temperatures recorded. The temperature log was attached to the refrigerator door, no logs found for October 2022, November 2022, or December 2022. Certified Medication Aide (CMA) PP stated staff should have completed the logs. On 12/07/22 at 10:21 AM observation revealed a medication cart located on the 300-hallway unlocked, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-12-13 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility had a census of 92 residents. The sample included 22 residents. Based on record review and interviews the facility failed to obtain immunization status, provide immunization, or obtain an informed declination for five residents, Resident (R) 13, R34, R33, R81, and R82, with the current Center of Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) influenza (flu) and/or pneumococcal (pneumonia-respiratory illness) immunization which placed the residents at risk for contracting influenza or pneumonia. Findings included: - Upon immunization record review revealed: R13's admission date of 07/12/22, the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) lacked influenza and pneumococcal immunization status and lacked evidence the immunization was offered and/or declined. R33's admission date of 05/09/16 EMR lacked pneumococcal immunization status and lacked evidence the immunization was offered and/or declined. R34's admission date of 11/23/22 EMR lacked pneumococcal immunization status and lacked evidence the immunization was offered and/or declined. R81's admission date of 04/11/22 EMR lacked pneumococcal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-13 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 92 residents. The sample included 22 residents, with five reviewed for abuse. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to prevent an incident of neglect for Resident (R)36, when staff willfully refused to provide R36 the required level of toileting assistance. The facility furtehr failed to prevent resident to resident abuse by Resident (R)194, who had multiple resident to resident altercations.This deficient practice placed the residents at risk for injury and impaired physical and psychosocial well-being. Findings Included: - R36's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses including a fractured femur (thigh bone) and dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of five, indicating severely impaired decision-making skill. The MDS documented R36 had delusions (belief or altered reality that is…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-13 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 92 residents. The sample included 22 residents. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to report incidents of resident-to-resident abuse involving Resident (R) 194 to the state agency as required. The placed the residents at risk for ongoing injury and unidentified abuse or mistreatment. Findings Included: - The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for R194 documented diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease (a progressive disease that destroys memory and other important mental functions), dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion), and anxiety (a feeling of worry, nervousness, or unease). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R194 had moderately impaired cognition and was dependent upon two staff for toileting, extensive assistance of two staff for dressing, supervision and set-up assistance for ambulation. R194 was independent with set-up assistance for bed mobility and transfers. The assessment further…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-12-13 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 92 residents. The sample included 22 residents. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to investigate incidents of resident-to-resident abuse involving Resident (R) 194. This placed the residents at risk for unidentified and ongoing abuse or mistreatment. Findings included: - The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for R194 documented diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease (a progressive disease that destroys memory and other important mental functions), dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion), and anxiety (a feeling of worry, nervousness, or unease). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R194 had moderately impaired cognition and was dependent upon two staff for toileting, extensive assistance of two staff for dressing, supervision and set-up assistance for ambulation. R194 was independent with set-up assistance for bed mobility and transfers. The assessment further documented R194 had no behaviors and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-12-13 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 92 residents. The sample included 22 residents with two reviewed for hospitalization. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide a bed hold notice to Resident (R)51, upon admission to the hospital twice. This deficient practice placed R51 at risk impaired rights to return to her original facility room upon return from the hospital. Findings included: - R51's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of pneumonia (severe inflammation of the lungs in which the alveoli (tiny air sacs) are filled with fluid), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD-chronic inflammatory lung disease that causes obstructed airflow from the lungs), respiratory failure with hypoxia (low levels of oxygen in your body tissues), aspiration pneumonia (when food or liquid is breathed into the airways or lungs, instead of being swallowed), and a pulmonary abscess (pus-filled cavity in the lung surrounded by inflamed tissue and caused by an infection). The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-13 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 92 residents. The sample included 22 residents. Based on interview and record review the facility failed to develop a baseline care plan for Resident (R)293's immediate health and safety needs, including dietary, activities of daily living (ADL) assistance, communication barriers, and respiratory. This deficient practice placed R293 at risk for inadequate care and services related to her health and safety. Findings included: - R293's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of acute on chronic combined congestive heart failure (condition in which the heart has trouble pumping blood through the body), atrial fibrillation (type of irregular heartbeat), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD-a group of diseases that cause airflow blockage and breathing-related problems), diabetes mellitus (a group of diseases that affect how the body uses blood sugar (glucose), and hypertension (high blood pressure). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], lacked information…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-12-13 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 92 residents. The sample included 22 residents. Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for Resident (R) 72's diabetic and wound care needs. The facility further failed to develop a care plan for R293's health and safety needs, including dietary, activities of daily living (ADL) assistance, respiratory and communication. This deficient practice placed the residents at risk for inadequate care and services. Findings Included: - The Physician Order Sheet, dated 12/02/22, recorded R72 had diagnoses of diabetes mellitus (disease that affects the body ability to produce or respond to insulin and regulate blood sugar levels), (Parkinson's Disease (progressive disease of the central nervous system marked by tremors, muscular rigidity, and uncontrolled movements), peripheral vascular disease (circulatory condition in which narrowed blood vessels reduce blood flow to the limbs), and muscle weakness. The Quarterly Minimum Data…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-13 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 92 residents. The sample included 22 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to review and revise the care plan for Resident (R)51 regarding her use of supplemental oxygen and R34 for dialysis (a process of purifying the blood of a person whose kidneys are not working normally) related care. This deficient practice placed R51 at risk for inadequate care related to her use of oxygen and R34 at risk for inadequate care related to dialysis. Findings included: - R51's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of pneumonia (severe inflammation of the lungs in which the alveoli (tiny air sacs) are filled with fluid), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD-chronic inflammatory lung disease that causes obstructed airflow from the lungs), respiratory failure with hypoxia (low levels of oxygen in your body tissues), aspiration pneumonia (when food or liquid is breathed into the airways or lungs, instead of being swallowed), and a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-13 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 92 residents. The sample included 22 residents, with seven reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs). Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide consistent bathing services for Resident (R) 16 and R35. This placed the residents at risk for impaired dignity and skin issues. Findings included: - The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for R16 documented diagnoses of schizophrenia (a psychiatric disorder characterized by gross distortion of reality, disturbances of language and communication and fragmentation of thought), depression (abnormal emotional state characterized by exaggerated feelings of sadness, worthlessness and emptiness), narcissistic personality (a disorder in which a person has an inflated sense of self importance), and hypertension (high blood pressure). R16's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MD), dated 08/03/22, documented R16 had intact cognition and required set-up assistance and supervision of transfers, mobility, dressing and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-13 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 92 residents. The sample included 22 residents with four reviewed for pressure ulcers (wound to skin and underlying tissue resulting from prolonged pressure on the area). Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to involve the Registered Dietician (RD) for nutritional interventions for one of four sampled residents, Resident (R) 72, who developed a facility acquired pressure ulcer. This placed the resident at risk to worsen his current pressure ulcer or develop more skin issues. Findings included: - The Physician Order Sheet, dated 12/02/22, recorded R72 had diagnoses of Parkinson's Disease (progressive disease of the central nervous system marked by tremors, muscular rigidity, and uncontrolled movements), peripheral vascular disease (circulatory condition in which narrowed blood vessels reduce blood flow to the limbs), and muscle weakness. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], recorded R72 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-12-13 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 92 residents. The sample included 22 residents with two reviewed for respiratory treatment. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide adequate respiratory care and services regarding Resident (R)51's use of supplemental oxygen. This deficient practice placed R51 at risk for less than optimal oxygen therapy. Findings included: - R51's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of pneumonia (severe inflammation of the lungs in which the alveoli (tiny air sacs) are filled with fluid), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD-chronic inflammatory lung disease that causes obstructed airflow from the lungs), respiratory failure with hypoxia (low levels of oxygen in your body tissues), aspiration pneumonia (when food or liquid is breathed into the airways or lungs, instead of being swallowed), and a pulmonary abscess (pus-filled cavity in the lung surrounded by inflamed tissue and caused by an infection). The Significant Change Minimum…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-13 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 92 residents. The sample included 22 residents with one reviewed for dialysis (the process of removing excess water, solutes, and toxins from the blood in people whose kidneys can no longer perform these functions naturally). Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide care and services for Resident (R) 34 with regard to his dialysis access when staff did not routinely assess the access site and lacked ongoing communication between the dialysis center and facility. This deficient practice placed R34 at risk for avoidable complications related to dialysis. Findings included: - R34's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of end stage renal disease (ESRD- medical condition in which a person's kidneys cease functioning on a permanent basis), normocytic anemia (fewer red blood cells than normal), hypertension (high blood pressure), and atrial fibrillation (irregular and often very rapid heart rhythm). The admission Minimum Data Set…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-12-13 · tag F0700 — isolated
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 92 residents. The sample included 22 residents with six reviewed for accident hazards. Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to complete an assessment for the safe use of side rails for one sampled resident, Residents (R) 33. This placed the resident at risk for entrapment and injuries related to side rail use. Findings included: - The Physician Order Sheet, dated 12/02/22, recorded R33 had diagnoses of alcohol induced dementia (persistent mental disorder marked by memory loss and impair reasoning), major depressive disorder (mental illness characterized by depressed mood and significant loss of interest in life activities), insomnia (problems falling and/or staying asleep), and muscle weakness The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], recorded R33 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of three (severely impaired cognition) with inattention and disorganized thinking. The MDS recorded R33 was independent with bed mobility and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-12-13 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolated
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 92 residents. The sample included 22 residents, with three reviewed for dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion) care. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide the necessary person-centered dementia care to attain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for one sampled resident, Resident (R) 194, who had multiple incidents of behaviors and resident-to-resident altercations. This placed the resident at risk for injury and unmet physical and psychosocial needs. Findings Included: - The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for R194 documented diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease (a progressive disease that destroys memory and other important mental functions), dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion), and anxiety (a feeling of worry, nervousness, or unease). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R194 had moderately…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-12-13 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 92 residents. The sample included 22 residents with five reviewed for unnecessary drugs. Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to obtain a copy and act upon the Consultant Pharmacist (CP) recommendations for Resident (R) 36's medication regimen review. This deficient practice placed R36 at risk for medication related issues. Findings included: - R36's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses including a fractured femur (thigh bone) and dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of five, indicating severely impaired decision-making skill. The MDS documented R36 had delusions (belief or altered reality that is persistently held despite evidence or agreement to the contrary), and no behaviors. The MDS documented R36 required limited assistance of one staff for eating and extensive assistance of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-13 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 92 residents. The sample included 22 residents with five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to notify the physician of elevated blood sugars out of the physician ordered parameters for Resident (R) 72 and failed to complete a physician ordered laboratory test for R36. This placed the residents at risk for adverse side effects and health problems. Findings included: - The Physician Order Sheet, dated 12/02/22, recorded R72 had diagnoses of diabetes mellitus (disease that affects the body ability to produce or respond to insulin and regulate blood sugar levels), Parkinson's disease (progressive disease of the central nervous system marked by tremors, muscular rigidity, and uncontrolled movements), peripheral vascular disease (circulatory condition in which narrowed blood vessels reduce blood flow to the limbs), and muscle weakness. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], recorded R72 had a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-12-13 · tag F0807 — failed to offer suitable drinks — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides drinks consistent with resident needs and preferences and sufficient to maintain resident hydration.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 92 residents. The sample included 22 residents. Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the resident received drinks consistent with her preferences for Resident (R)86 who requested milk with every meal. This deficient practice placed R86 at risk to not have her rights and choices respected. Findings included: - R86's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of hypertension (high blood pressure), gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD-occurs when stomach acid repeatedly flows back into the tube connecting your mouth and stomach), and a history of ileus (obstruction of the bowel). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R86 had intact cognition with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15. The MDS documented R86 was independent with eating, required extensive assistance of two staff for dressing, toileting, and total staff assistance for bed mobility and transfers. The MDS documented R86 weighed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-12-13 · tag F0887 — isolated
    Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility had a census of 92 residents. The sample included 22 residents. Based on record review and interviews the facility failed to obtain immunization status, provide immunization, or obtain an informed declination for three of five sampled residents, Resident (R) 13, R34, and R82, for COVID-19 ( highly contagious, potentially fatal respiratory virus) immunization which placed the residents at increased risk for contracting COVID-19. Findings included: - Upon immunization record review revealed: R13's admission date of 07/12/22, the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) lacked COVID-19 immunization status and lacked evidence the immunization was offered and/or declined. R34's admission date of 11/23/22 EMR lacked COVID-19 immunization status and lacked evidence the immunization was offered and/or declined. R82's admission date of 07/13/22 EMR lacked COVID-19 immunization status and lacked evidence the immunization was offered and/or declined. On 12/12/22 at 04:00 PM Administrative Nurse E stated she would like to have the residents' immunization records updated in the EMR within…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2026-04-29 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespread
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to dispose of garbage and refuse properly by failing to ensure the lid of the dumpster was kept closed.Findings included:- During the initial tour of the kitchen on 04/27/26 at 08:57 AM, observation revealed the two doors to the outside dumpster were open. The ground around the dumpster was littered with used disposable gloves, used hairnets, empty restaurant take-out containers, and other unidentifiable objects. On 04/28/26 at 01:57 PM, Dietary Staff BB stated the doors to the dumpster were often not closed by staff after disposing of trash, as required.The facility did not have a policy regarding keeping the doors of the dumpster closed.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2026-04-29 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespread
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure a safe and sanitary environment in the facility laundry.Findings included:- On 04/28/2026 at 11:55 AM, inspection of the laundry with Housekeeping/Maintenance Staff WW revealed the following concerns:Unsealed concrete floor surfaces throughout the laundry room floor.A folding tabletop had missing laminate and exposed wood.Shelving in the clean laundry area had exposed bare wood.Missing paint on the ceiling area approximately one foot by two feet. Eighteen broken tiles on the laundry floor folding area. A three-foot section of clean linen shelving and upright post had bare wooden shelves with exposed wood. The second shelf from the bottom corner pf the wooden shelving unit was missing paint. The dryer room ceiling had cardboard taped to the ceiling approximately four inches by eight inches.On 04/28/2026 at 12:04 PM, Housekeeping/Maintenance Staff UU agreed the above findings needed fixing and the shelves should be replaced. He reported the hole in the ceiling was due to a vent cover being removed and said the opening…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$46,483 in federal fines across 3 penalties.

  • $13,627 — penalty dated 2024-08-05
  • $16,055 — penalty dated 2024-08-05
  • $16,801 — penalty dated 2024-08-05

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to TUTERA SENIOR LIVING & HEALTH CARE — 25 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 3 of 52.0+1.0 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.2-0.2 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 51.7+1.3 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 53.0+2.0 vs chain
The other 24 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.0★, per CMS)
1 of 5Bethany Rehab & HccDekalb, IL 1 of 5Carlinville Rehab & HccCarlinville, IL 1 of 5Coulterville Rehab & HccCoulterville, IL 1 of 5Crystal Pines Rehab & HccCrystal Lake, IL 1 of 5Fair Oaks Rehab & HealthcareSouth Beloit, IL 1 of 5Grand Meadows Senior Living & Health CareAsbury, IA 1 of 5Hillsboro Rehab & HccHillsboro, IL 1 of 5Mattoon Rehab & HccMattoon, IL 1 of 5Metropolis Rehab & HccMetropolis, IL 1 of 5Moweaqua Rehab & HccMoweaqua, IL 1 of 5St Paul's Senior CommunityBelleville, IL 1 of 5Windsor Estates Of St CharlesSaint Charles, MO 2 of 5The Village At MissionPrairie Village, KS 2 of 5Westview Of Derby Rehabilitation & Health Care CenDerby, KS 3 of 5Carnegie Village Rehabilitation & Health Care CentBelton, MO 3 of 5Dixon Rehab & HccDixon, IL 3 of 5Highland Rehabilitation & Health Care CenterKansas City, MO 3 of 5Lakeland Rehab & Healthcare CenterEffingham, IL 3 of 5Monterey Park Rehabilitation & Health Care CenterIndependence, MO 3 of 5NorterreLiberty, MO 3 of 5Northland Rehabilitation & Health Care CenterKansas City, MO 3 of 5Stratford Commons Rehab & Health Care CenterOverland Park, KS 3 of 5Tiffany Springs Rehabilitation & Health Care CenteKansas City, MO 5 of 5Charlton Place Rehab And Healthcare CenterDeatsville, AL

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
BROOKS, KILEYIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 02/15/2022
GANNON, JEFFIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 02/15/2022
WALNUT CREEK MANAGEMENT COMPANY LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/01/2005
TUTERA, JOSEPHIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; LIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTERESTsince 01/01/2005
JCT FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIPOrganizationLIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTERESTsince 01/01/2005
TUTERA, DOMINICIndividualLIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTERESTsince 01/01/2005
TUTERA, HANNAHIndividualLIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTERESTsince 01/01/2005
TUTERA, LAURAIndividualLIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTERESTsince 01/01/2005

CMS files one row per role, so the 11 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$7.1M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-8.7%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$693K
Related-party expense9% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 81%Medicare 2%Other / private 17%

About 81% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $693K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$236per resident / day
operating cost
$7,175per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$217per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in KS

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Kansas Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Kansas
$8,669/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$9,064/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,975/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 175274. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-04-29, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next