No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Westview Of Derby Rehabilitation & Health Care Cen

445 N Westview Dr, Derby, KS 67037 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 78 certified beds · (316) 788-3739 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (316) 788-3739 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citation — no harm found (F0610) — cited Mar 2024Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)1 actual-harm citation3 immediate-jeopardy citations CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)$100,981 in federal fines1 Medicare payment denial
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation
  • inspectors recorded 3 serious findings as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (53) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $100,981 in federal fines (most recent 2025-04-15)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (63%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 4 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
201 N Georgie Ave · (316) 719-2001 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
458 N Baltimore Ave · (316) 788-4317 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
512 E Madison Ave, Derby , 67037, United States · (316) 706-5535 · Call to confirm hours
Park
960 N Lakeview Dr · (316) 788-0301 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
421 N Westview Dr · (316) 616-7772

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 3 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased15.4%17.9%15.4%typical
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight10.8%4.9%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%1.6%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%2.9%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms39.2%6.5%6.5%check this — see note marked dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury6.0%4.3%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened17.9%16.2%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication23.6%23.2%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine88.6%95.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers1.4%4.4%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control15.0%22.6%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table18.4%18.1%17.1%typical
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.9%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine54.2%73.8%79.4%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days0.761.801.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.002.131.80better

This value is several times the typical-state benchmark. It can be real, or it can be a coding artifact in what the facility submitted. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

9.7%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
0.08U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.03hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.05hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
<0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.08 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 4% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 7% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.7%CMS range 6.5–15.510.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identifiednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF staynot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsenednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.801.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.41
RN hours/ resident / day
0.70
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.14
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.26
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.29
RN hoursweekends
62.8%
Total nursing turnover
58.3%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 78 beds and averages 63.0 residents a day — about 81% occupied, or roughly 15 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.26 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.41 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.14 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.90 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.40 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.46 to 0.29 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 63% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

17
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-03-05)
12
at the previous standard inspection (2023-05-18)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

53 citations, most serious first. The 14 most serious are shown; the remaining 39 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-05-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 65 with three of residents selected for reviewed for accident hazards. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a safe and secure environment to prevent the elopement of cognitively impaired R1, identified at risk for elopement. On 05/07/24 at 09:40 AM a CNA M let R1 out the front doors of the building. CNA M thought R1 had an appointment and was leaving to get on the facility transport vehicle. When R1 went out the doors his WanderGuard caused an alarm to activate, and CNA M did not check which resident caused the alarm. The facility did not know R1 was not in the building until almost 15 minutes later when a staff member driving by the facility saw the resident outside, unsupervised, and notified the facility. Staff found the resident approximately 90 feet from the facility, heading toward a highly trafficked, 4 lane road. These failures placed R1 in immediate jeopardy. Findings included: - Review of the resident's Electronic Health…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-01-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 64 residents with three residents identified and reviewed for elopement. Based on interview, observation, and record review the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to prevent cognitively impaired Resident (R)1, with a known history of elopement, from leaving the facility unsupervised and without staff knowledge on 12/31/23 at approximately 06:30 AM. The facility staff did not know R1 was not in the facility until the oncoming nurse, Licensed Nurse (LN) D, asked a Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) G to locate R1. The facility staff could not locate R1 on 12/31/23 at 06:30 AM and LN D started the elopement process. At 07:30 AM, CNA G found R1 outside, at the back of the facility, at the bottom of the concrete stairs. R1 exited the facility through a known malfunctioning exit door in the dark, followed the sidewalk around the building, and attempted to walk down 12 unlit concrete steps, at which time R1 fell and hit his head. When R1 left the facility, the temperature measured…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2023-09-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 57 residents with three sampled for elopement. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff provided a safe and secure environment for cognitively impaired Resident (R)1. On [DATE] at approximately 07:05 AM, Licensed Nurse (LN) I walked in the front doors of the facility to report for her shift while R1 walked out of the front doors. LN I assumed R1 was a visitor or employee. The facility staff did not realize R1 was missing until 07:45 AM (40 minutes later), at which time the facility staff began searching for R1. Around 10:00 AM the family notified the facility R1 was found deceased by the train tracks at approximately 08:30 AM, after being struck by a train. R1 had walked approximately eight city blocks away, crossed a busy four lane street/highway with speed limits of 30 miles per hour, and onto heavily trafficked train tracks. This deficient practice placed R1 in immediate jeopardy. Findings included: - Review of R1's Electronic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-01-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 43 residents with three residents reviewed for accidents. Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure one resident remained free of accident hazards related to mechanical lift transfers when Resident (R) 1 obtained an injury on 11/15/24 at approximately 07:00 PM when an unknown staff member failed to safely operate the mechanical lift and transferred the resident without another staff member present. This deficient practice resulted in a fracture (broken bone) of R1's left patella (kneecap). Findings included: - Review of the Electronic Health Record (EHR) for R1 included diagnoses of cerebral palsy (a progressive disorder of movement, muscle tone or posture caused by injury or abnormal development in the immature brain, most often before birth), diabetes mellitus type two (DM2 - when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin made or the body cannot respond to the insulin), blindness, and restless leg syndrome (RLS - a disorder that causes an overwhelming urge to move one's legs). The Annual Minimum…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-16 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 62 residents; the sample included six residents reviewed for bowel movements and related monitoring. Based on observation, interview, and record review revealed the facility failed to monitor and respond to Resident (R)1 for lack of bowel movements. Findings included:- R1's Electronic Medical Records (EMR) documented diagnoses that included unspecified symptoms and signs involving cognitive functions and awareness (various disorders that affect an individual's intellectual capabilities and conscious perception of their surroundings), and constipation (difficulty passing stools).R1's 07/25/25 Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of four, indicating severe cognitive impairment. The MDS noted R1 was always incontinent of bladder, but bowels were unrated on the assessment; R1 did not have a toileting program, and/or constipation.R1's Urinary Continence and Indwelling Catheter Care Area Assessment (CAA), dated 07/25/25, documented R1 was incontinent of bladder and bowel. Staff assisted him…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 62 residents; the sample included six residents reviewed for accidents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement an intervention to prevent further falls after a fall with serious injury for Resident (R) 1. Findings included:- R1's Electronic Medical Records (EMR), documented diagnoses which included unspecified symptoms and signs involving cognitive functions and awareness (various disorders that affect an individual's intellectual capabilities and conscious perception of their surroundings), displaced intertrochanteric fracture of right femur with nonunion (a break in the right thigh bone, specifically in the area between the greater and lesser trochanters, where the bone fragments have shifted out of alignment and have failed to heal after a prolonged period, even after treatment), anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty, and irrational fear), muscle weakness, and a history of falling. R1's 07/25/25 Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) documented a Brief…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-03-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 69 residents. The facility had one main kitchen and one dining area. The facility failed to ensure that staff members properly tested and recorded the dish machine temperatures. This deficient practice placed residents at risk for contamination and food-borne illness. Findings included: - The initial tour of the facility on 03/03/25 at 07:29 AM review of the Dish Machine Log from 02/01/25 to 02/28/25 revealed 34 undocumented dish machine water temperature opportunities out 84 opportunities. The dish machine lacked a Dish Machine Log for 03/2025 was eight undocumented dish machine water temperatures. On 03/03/25 at 07:30 AM, Dietary Aide CC stated the dish machine water temperature was checked all the time. Dietary Staff CC stated the Dish Machine Log for 03/2025 was in the Certified Dietary Manager's office. On 03/04/25 at 12:06 PM, Dietary Staff BB stated the dish machine water temperature should be checked at least daily. Dietary Staff BB stated he had not posted the Dish Machine Log 03/2025. The facility's undated Food Storage policy did not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-03-05 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespread
    Conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 69 residents. The sample included 18 residents. Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to conduct a thorough facility-wide assessment to determine the resources necessary to care for residents competently during day-to-day operations and emergencies. This failure affected all 69 residents residing in the facility. Findings Included: - On 03/03/25 Administrative Nurse D provided a Facility Assessment updated 08/12/24. A review of the assessment revealed the following: The assessment failed to identify the specific staffing levels needed for each unit and identify the number of Registered Nurses (RN), Licensed Nurses (LPN/LVN), Certified Medication Aides (CMA), and Certified Nurse Aides (CNA) needed for each unit, patient acuity, and census. The assessment lacked staffing levels required for each shift to include evenings and weekends. The assessment failed to identify the means of input gathered from the residents and their representatives when formulating the assessment data. The assessment lacked informed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-03-05 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — pattern
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility had a census of 69 residents. The sample included 18 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to keep Resident (R) 38's protected health information (PHI) private on a medication cart parked in the main dining room. This deficient practice placed R38 at risk for impaired privacy. Findings included: - On 03/04/25 at 10:02 AM, an observation revealed a medication cart parked in the 400 hallway with a laptop computer sitting on the top, the computer screen was unlocked and open, and R38's PHI was on the screen visible to all who passed by the medication cart. The information visualized included R38's medications, date of birth , allergy information, and code status. No nursing staff were in view of the medication cart. Certified Medication Aide (CMA) R agency exited another room into the hallway. On 03/04/25 at 10:05 AM, CMA R stated she had just walked away from the medication cart for just a minute. CMA R stated she should not leave the computer open and R38's PHI. On 03/05/25 at 12:50 PM, Licensed Nurse (LN) G stated the laptop…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-03-05 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 69 residents. The sample included 18 residents, with eight residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL) for dependent residents. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a shower/bath was provided for Resident (R) 11, R34, R14, and R15 who were dependent on staff assistance with ADLs. This deficient practice had the potential to cause skin breakdown and/or skin complications due to poor personal hygiene and impaired psychosocial well-being. Findings included: - R11's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnosis tab documented diagnoses of muscle weakness, need for assistance with personal care, and depression (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest). The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 which indicated intact cognition. The MDS documented R11 was dependent on staff assistance for transfers and required…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-03-05 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — pattern
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 69 residents. The sample included 18 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to provide resident directed, interactive activities based on resident preferences for the residents on the weekends. This deficient practice placed the affected residents at risk for decreased psychosocial well-being, boredom, and isolation. Findings Included: - A review of the facility's Activity Calendars for December 2024, January 2025, and February 2025 was completed. The calendars revealed the residents were provided church related services via television or internet on Sundays. The calendar revealed movies were played for the residents at 02:30 PM and the evening news at 06:00 PM on Sundays. The calendars lacked engaging staff-led activities for Sundays. On 03/04/25 at 10:30 AM, the facility provided music and exercise group for the residents in the dining hall area. On 03/04/25 at 11:00 AM, the facility's Resident Council reported the facility rarely provided activities on weekends. The council reported very little…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 69 residents. The sample included 18 residents, with five residents reviewed for accidents and/or hazards. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to secure areas containing hazardous materials out of reach of seven cognitively impaired /independently mobile residents in the secured unit. The facility further failed to implement interventions related to Resident (R)28's falls. This deficient practice placed the affected residents at risk for preventable injuries and accidents. Findings Included: - The facility identified that Residents (R) 5, R16, R22, R30, R42, R53, and R60 were cognitively impaired and independently mobile within the facility. On 03/03/25 at 07:03 AM, a walkthrough of the facility was completed. Upon inspection of the facility's supplemental oxygen storage room revealed the entry door was unlocked. An inspection of the room revealed 46 fully charged supplemental oxygen cylinder tanks. At 07:05 AM Licensed Nurse (LN) G secured the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-03-05 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 69 residents. The sample included 18 residents, with one medication room and three medication carts. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure controlled substances were accounted for and reconciled between shifts. This placed the residents at risk for misappropriation and/or diversion of controlled substances. Findings included: - On 03/04/25 at 07:12 AM a review of the January, February, and March of 2025 Shift Change Controlled Substance Inventory Count Sheet on the 100 and 200, halls revealed a missing signature for the On Nurse were 02/14, 02/15, 02/16, 02/17, 02/18, 02/ 20, 02/22, 02/23, 03/01, and 03/02. On 03/04/25 at 07:12 AM a review of January, February, and March of 2025 Shift Change Controlled Substance Inventory Count Sheet on the 100 and 200 halls revealed a missing signature for the Off Nurse. The missing signatures for 02/02, 02/05, 02/18, 02/20, 02/22, and 02/28. On 03/04/25 at 07:12 AM, Certified Medication Aide (CMA) S stated all CMAs or Nurses were to count the medication cards, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-05 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — pattern
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 69 residents. The sample included 18 residents with seven residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the physician reviewed and addressed the Consultant Pharmacist (CP) recommendations for Resident (R) 60's as needed antipsychotic medication (a class of medications used to treat major mental conditions that cause a break from reality). The facility also failed to ensure the CP identified and reported irregularities regarding the lack of dosing instructions for Voltaren (topical pain reliever medication) gel for R4. The facility also failed to ensure the physician reviewed and addressed the CP's recommendations for reeducation of R14's analgesics (pain relief) dosage. The facility also failed to ensure the physician had reviewed and addressed the CP's recommendation for R26's antidepressant (a class of medications used to treat mood disorders) medication. These deficient practices placed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 39 citations
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-05 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — pattern
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    - The Medical Diagnosis section within R57's Electronic Medical Records (EMR) included diagnoses of Parkinson's disease (a slowly progressive neurologic disorder characterized by resting tremors, rolling of the fingers, masklike faces, shuffling gait, muscle rigidity, and weakness), depression (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest), and anxiety disorder (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty, and irrational fear). R57's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated 12/19/24 noted a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 indicating intact cognition. The MDS noted he required substantial to maximal assistance with transfers, toileting, bed mobility, bathing, and personal hygiene. The MDS noted he took anxiolytic medication. R57's Psychotropic Drug Use Area Assessment (CAA) completed 12/28/24 indicated he was on hospice services and took antianxiety medication. The CAA instructed staff to monitor him for side effects. The CAA noted the consultant pharmacist (CO) would recommend a gradual dose reduction…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 69 residents. The facility identified nine residents on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP - infection control interventions designed to reduce transmission of resistant organisms which employ targeted gown and glove use during high contact care). Based on record review, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to store oxygen saturation equipment and nebulizer (a device that changes liquid medication into a mist easily inhaled into the lungs) tubing in a sanitary manner and further failed to ensure the required personal protective equipment (PPE) was worn while doing tracheostomy (opening through the neck into the trachea through which an indwelling tube may be inserted) care. This deficient practice placed the residents at risk for infectious diseases. Findings included: - On 03/03/25 at 07:08 AM, during the walk-through of the facility, Resident (R) 225's oxygen tubing and cannula were wrapped over her walker and her nebulizer tubing was on her side table, the tubing for R225 was not stored in a sanitary manner. On 03/04/25 at 01:26 PM,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-05 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 69 residents. The sample included 18 residents, with two residents sampled for reasonable accommodations of needs. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 24's call light was within her reach and further failed to provide foot pedals for R25 while pushing her in the hall. This deficient practice left R24 vulnerable to unmet care needs due to the inability to call for staff assistance and placed R25 at an increased risk for preventable falls and injuries. Findings Included: - R24's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnosis tab documented diagnoses of heart failure (a condition with low heart output), hemiparesis/hemiplegia (weakness and paralysis on one side of the body) following a cerebral infarction (stroke - the sudden death of brain cells due to lack of oxygen caused by impaired blood flow to the brain by blockage or rupture of an artery to the brain), effecting the left nondominant side, muscle weakness…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-05 · tag F0571 — isolated
    Limit the charges against residents' personal funds for items or services for which payment is made under Medicare or Medicaid.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 69 residents. The sample included 18 residents, with one reviewed for personal funds. Based on record review, interviews, and observations, the facility failed to prevent unnecessary charges to Resident (R) 218 bank account resulting in multiple charges to his bank account. This deficient practice placed R218 at risk for misappropriation of funds. Findings Included: - The Medical Diagnosis section within R57's Electronic Medical Records (EMR) included diagnoses of Chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder (COPD - a progressive and irreversible condition characterized by diminished lung capacity and difficulty or discomfort in breathing), senile degeneration of the brain, and dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion). R218's EMR indicated he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R218's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) completed 09/19/24 noted a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of seven indicating severe cognitive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-05 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 69 with 18 residents included in the sample. The facility identified 12 residents who were discharged from Medicare Part A services. Based on interview and record review the facility failed to issue CMS (Center for Medicare/Medicaid Services) Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notification (SNF ABN) form 10055 (the form used to notify Medicare A participants of potential financial liability when a Medicare Part A episode ends) for Resident (R) 63. This failure placed the residents at risk for decreased autonomy and impaired decision-making. Findings included: - Review of R63's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented that the Medicare Part A episode began on 11/13/24 and ended on 012/06/24. R12 remained in the facility for custodial care. The facility was unable to provide evidence that staff issued the SNF ABN 10055. On 03/02/25 at 11:25 AM, Social Service X stated she had never given an SNF ABN for residents ending Medicare part that were staying in the facility. She stated she was not trained to give SNF ABN. The facility's Skilled…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-05 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 69 residents. The sample included 18 residents, with three residents reviewed for treatment/services to prevent/heal pressure ulcers (localized injury to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence, because of pressure, or pressure in combination with shear and/or friction). Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 24's heels were offloading, heel protectors were applied to both heels and further failed to monitor R24's low air loss mattress. This placed R24 at increased risk for developing pressure ulcers. Findings Included: - R24's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnosis tab documented diagnoses of heart failure (a condition with low heart output), hemiparesis/hemiplegia (weakness and paralysis on one side of the body) following a cerebral infarction (stroke - sudden death of brain cells due to lack of oxygen caused by impaired blood flow to the brain by blockage or rupture of an artery to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-05 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 69 residents. The sample included 18 residents, with one resident reviewed for hemodialysis (a procedure using a machine to remove excess water, solutes, and toxins from the blood in people whose kidneys can no longer perform these functions naturally). Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to consistently monitor and document Resident (R) 54's dialysis (a procedure where impurities or wastes were removed from the blood), shunt for bruit (blowing or swishing sound heard when blood flows through a shunt), thrill (a fine vibration felt that reflects the blood flow by a dialysis resident's shunt), and dressing. This deficient practice placed R54 at risk of potential adverse outcomes and physical complications related to dialysis. Findings included: - R54's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnosis tab documented diagnoses of diabetes mellitus (DM - when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin made or the body cannot respond to the insulin), dialysis hypertension (HTN - elevated blood pressure),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-05 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 69 residents. The sample included 18 residents, with seven reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on record review, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure R4's Diclofenac (topical medicated ointment used to treat pain) medication had a dosage administration amount. This deficient practice placed both residents at risk for unnecessary medications and potential side effects. Findings Included: - The Medical Diagnosis section within R4's Electronic Medical Records (EMR) included diagnoses of cerebral infarction (stroke - sudden death of brain cells due to lack of oxygen caused by impaired blood flow to the brain by blockage or rupture of an artery to the brain), muscle weakness, aphasia (difficulty speaking), chronic kidney disease, and heart failure. R4's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated 12/16/24 noted a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of zero indicating severe cognitive impairment. The MDS indicated she required substantial to maximal assistance with transfers, bed mobility, dressing, toileting,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-05 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 69 residents. The sample included 18 residents, three medication carts, and one medication room. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to properly label medication in one of the three medication carts. This placed the residents at risk for adverse outcomes or ineffective medication regimens. Findings included: - On 03/05/25 at 09:06 AM the licensed nurse medication cart on the 400 hallway contained one opened, undated insulin (a hormone that lowers the level of glucose in the blood) pen. On 03/05/25 at 09:06 AM, Licensed Nurse (LN) G stated all insulin pens should be labeled once they are removed from the refrigerator and placed into the medication cart. On 03/05/25 at 01:17 PM, Administrative Nurse D stated she expected all insulin pens to be dated and labeled once the pens were opened. The facility failed to provide a policy related to medication storage. The facility failed to properly label medications. This deficient practice could potentially cause adverse consequences or ineffective treatment to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-17 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 70 residents with three selected for review for bathing services. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide adequate bathing services for the three residents reviewed, Resident (R)1, R2, and R3. Findings included: - The Medical Diagnosis tab in the electronic medical record (EMR) for Resident (R)1 included diagnoses of muscle weakness and need for assistance with personal care. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] assessed R1 with a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12, indicating moderate cognitive impairment. R1 required a wheelchair and walker for mobility, set-up or clean-up assistance for bathing and getting in/out of tub/shower. The Functional Abilities Care Area Assessment dated 12/27/23 revealed R1's self-care and mobility will be addressed in the care plan. The Quarterly MDS dated 03/25/24 assessed R1 with a BIMS score of 15, indicating intact cognition and R1 had no changes to mobility devices used or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-03-05 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — pattern
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 60 residents which included two residents sampled for allegations of abuse. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to suspend alleged perpetrator in response to an allegation of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment, to prevent further potential abuse for the residents of the facility on one of four halls (400 hall) of the facility while an investigation of abuse was in progress related to Resident (R)1. Findings included: - On 03/04/24 at 02:46 PM, Administrative Nurse A stated she received a report of an allegation of abuse on 02/27/24 from Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) B. The allegation included CNA C and Licensed nurse (LN) D restrained and dragged Resident (R)1 to her room and forced her to take medication on 02/25/24. Administrative Nurse A confirmed she suspended LN D and CNA C on 02/28/24, the next day. She allowed CNA C to work the night shift on 02/27/24, 10:00 PM to 06:00 AM after she received the allegation of abuse. Administrative Nurse A stated she should have suspended CNA C to ensure the residents where safe…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-05-18 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 56 residents. The facility had one main kitchen. The kitchen served food to one main dining area. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to properly store food in the main kitchen refrigerators due to foods left uncovered, boxes placed directly on the floor in the kitchen area, and staff failed to discard expired foods in accordance with professional standards for food service safety, to prevent food borne illness to the residents. Findings included: - During the brief initial tour of the kitchen, on 05/15/23 at 07:46 AM, observation revealed the following concerns: 1. The walk-in refrigerator had one large bowl of undated green jello with fruit in it, with the plastic wrap falling into the jello. 2. The kitchen dry storage area had one 500-piece box of foam cups, one box of lids for the cups, one large bag of potatoes, and five boxes of oil stored directly on the floor. Also, one undated 10-pound (lbs.) bag of dry spaghetti noodles stored on the shelf. Furthermore, 24 four ounce containers of prune juice with a use…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-05-18 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespread
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 56 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide housekeeping and maintenance services to ensure a safe and sanitary environment for the residents and staff related to items/areas in the facility laundry. Findings included: - The laundry tour on 05/18/23 at 09:22 AM, with Housekeeping/Maintenance Staff V and W identified the following areas of concern: 1. A one foot section of cove base dislodged along an interior wall in the soiled linen area with dirt and debris present. 2. An approximate five-foot section of cove base missing on the back wall of the soiled laundry area. 3. A door with a metal plate protruding from the wooden door at the entrance of the washer room. 4. A washing machine with a white lime deposit build-up that covered the exterior of the machine. 5. A missing panel on the wall behind the washing machine. 6. The platform for the washing machine was made of unsealed concrete, which was not sanitizable. 7. The hopper with brown stain and build-up around the parameter of the bowl and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-05-18 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — widespread
    Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 56 residents. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop, implement and permanently maintain an in-service training program for nurses aides that is appropriate and effective as to ensure the continuing competence of nurse aides with no less than 12 hours per year. Five of five nurse aides also lacked dementia management training, resident abuse prevention training Findings included: - The following hour totaled for the last 12 months indicated the following concerns: 1. Certified Nurse's aide (CNA) I had a total of in-service hours of one and a half total hours. The training record lacked dementia or abuse training. 2. CNA J had a total of in-service hours of three hours The training record lacked dementia or abuse training. 3. CNA K had a total of in-service hours equaled nine hours and fifty minutes of training. The training record lacked dementia and abuse training. 4. CNA L had a total of in-service hours equaled three hours. The training record lacked dementia and abuse training. 5. CNA M lacked indication of any…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-05-18 · tag F0625 — pattern
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 56 residents with 14 residents included in the sample. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a written notice specifying the duration and cost of the bed hold policy at the time of the residents' transfers to the hospital. This included Resident (R) 14, R 13, R 47, R 164. Findings included: - Review of R47's Electronic Medical Record dated 04/24/23, revealed the facility lacked a signed bed hold with a written notice specifying the duration and cost of the bed hold policy, at the time of the resident's transfer to the hospital on [DATE]. On 05/17/23 at 09:55 AM, Social Service staff D stated the charge nurse would send a copy of the bed-hold policy with the resident upon the discharge to the hospital. Interview with Administrative Nurse B on 05/17/23 at 10:01 AM revealed it was the expectation of the nursing staff that with each hospitalization the bed hold policy should be sent with the resident and scanned into the resident's chart. On 05/17/23…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-18 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 56 residents with 14 sampled which included two residents reviewed for choices. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide choices for Resident (R)39 related to her preferences for waking up in the morning. Findings included: - Review of Resident (R)39's Physician Orders, dated 04/25/23, the resident had diagnoses that included hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body), and hemiparesis (muscular weakness of one half of the body) following a cerebral infarction (CVA/stroke - sudden death of brain cells due to lack of oxygen caused by impaired blood flow to the brain by blockage or rupture of an artery to the brain affecting left non-dominant side, difficulty walking, muscle weakness, and need for assistance with personal care). The admission Minimum Data Set, (MDS), dated [DATE], documentation revealed the Brief Interview for Mental Status, (BIMS) score of 15, indicating intact cognition. She did not exhibit behaviors or rejection of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-18 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 56 residents with 14 sampled that included three for hospitalization. Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to notify/ send a copy of the notice of facility-initiated hospitalization transfer/discharge to a representative of the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman of the reason for the transfers for Resident (R) 13, R14, and R47's required hospitalizations. - Review of R13's Minimum Data Set (MDS) tracking form documented the resident discharged to the hospital on [DATE] and returned to the facility on [DATE]. Furthermore, the resident discharged to the hospital again on 04/30/23 and returned to the facility on [DATE]. Review of R13's Medical Record lacked evidence of a written notification of the facility-initiated hospitalizations transfer/discharges to the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman. On 05/17/23 at 09:55 AM, Social Service staff D confirmed she did not send a notice to the Office of the State Long Term Care Ombudsman…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-18 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 56 residents, with 14 sampled including two residents sampled for Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR). Based on interview and record review the facility failed to coordinate an assessment with the PASARR program for a level II screening as recommended for Resident (R) 22. Findings Included: - The Electronic Health Record (EHR) for R22 revealed the following diagnoses included anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty and irrational fear) and schizoaffective disorder (mental health disorder characterized by a combination of symptoms of schizophrenia). The 11/13/19 Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) Determination Letter indicated a need for further evaluation and would be referred for a Level II screening. The 05/09/23 Care Plan lacked documentation of PASARR Level II requirements. The 05/17/23 EHR for R22 lacked documentation of a PASARR Level II assessment. On 05/17/23 at 10:25 AM, Licensed Nurse E stated R22 could make her needs known and was able to do most things for herself.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-18 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 56 residents, with 14 residents sampled for review. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for Resident (R) 13 and R15 which included oxygen use and care. Findings included: - R13's pertinent diagnoses from the Electronic Health Record (EHR) included anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty, and irrational fear), asthma (disorder of narrowed airways that caused wheezing and shortness of breath), and dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion). The 05/12/22 admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) documented R13 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, indicating intact cognition. The assessment documented no oxygen use. The 02/10/23 Quarterly MDS documented a BIMS of 15, indicating intact cognition and documented R13 had not used oxygen. The 05/15/23 Care Plan lacked documentation of nebulizer medication or oxygen use or the care of the equipment. The Physicians…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-18 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 56 residents with 14 residents sampled which included two residents reviewed for nutrition. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to accurately obtain weight and verify weights as needed to monitor and address Resident (R)23's nutritional status/weight loss. Findings included: - Review of Resident (R)23's Physician Orders, (POS) dated 03/21/23, documentation included diagnoses of major depression disorder (abnormal emotional state characterized by exaggerated feelings of sadness, worthlessness, emptiness and hopelessness), dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion), with behavioral disturbances, acquired absence of limb, hypertension (high blood pressure), diabetes (when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin made or the body cannot respond to the insulin), encephalopathy (condition of the brain), cerebral infarct (stroke- sudden death of brain cells due to lack of oxygen caused by impaired blood…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-18 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census 56 residents with 14 residents sampled which included one resident reviewed for dialysis (a process of removing excess water, solutes, and toxins from the blood in people whose kidneys can no longer perform these functions naturally). Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that Resident (R) 55, who required dialysis, receive services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to monitor for the effectiveness and adverse reactions related to dialysis. Findings included: - Review of Resident (R)55's Physician Orders, (POS) dated 02/24/23, documented diagnoses which included malignant neoplasm (terminal cancer), end stage renal disease, muscle weakness, reduced mobility, and presence of urogenital implant (suprapubic catheter-a surgically place tube through the abdominal wall which drains the bladder. The admission Minimum Data Set, (MDS), dated [DATE], documentation included the resident's Brief Interview for Mental Status, (BIMS)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 56 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective infection control program related to Resident (R) 26's urinary catheter, and R13 and R15, related to nubulizer storage. Findings included: - Review of Resident (R) 26 Physician Orders dated 03/09/23 revealed diagnosis that included neurogenic bladder (dysfunction of urinary bladder caused by a lesion of the nervous system) requiring indwelling catheter (a tube placed in the bladder to drain urine into a collection bag). The annual Minimal Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 02, indicating severely impaired cognition. The Activities of Daily Living documented the resident required two-person physical assist with toileting and required an indwelling catheter. Review of the Care Plan dated 12/20/22, guided staff to position the catheter bag and tubing below the bladder and away from the entrance room door. Observation…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-18 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 56 residents with 14 residents sampled which included five residents selected for review of influenza, pneumococcal, and COVID vaccines. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident/resident representative received information/education regarding the benefits, risks, or medical contraindications of influenza, pneumococcal, and/or COVID vaccines for Resident (R)39. Findings included: - Review of Resident (R)39's immunizations records provided by Administrative Nurse B revealed the records lacked documentation of vaccine information/education for influenza, pneumococcal, and COVID vaccines provided to the resident and/or their representatives to demonstrate the benefits verses risks of receiving the vaccines. The facility lacked documentation the resident had been offered or provided an opportunity to receive the vaccine. - On 05/18/23 3:34 PM, Administrative Nurse B, confirmed the records noted above were all inclusive. She stated the provided documentation was all she was able to provide. The facility policy…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2021-09-30 · tag F0801 — widespread
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility census totaled 42 residents. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a qualified Dietician or Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) worked in the facility to carry out the functions of food and nutritional services for the 42 residents who resided in the facility and received meals from the facility kitchen. Findings included: - During the annual survey 09/27/21-09/30/21, the facility could not provide documentation of a Dietician evaluating Dietary Manager H or documentation of Dietician in-house to complete assessments and oversee the functions of the kitchen. Additionally, the facility could not provide evidence Dietary Manager H completed or enrolled for the CDM training classes. Interview with Dietary Manager H on 09/27/21 at 10:35 AM revealed she was not a CDM but planned on taking the classes soon. DM H stated a Corporate Dietician worked for the facility, but she has never met that person and did not know the Corporate Dietician's name. Interview with Administrative Nurse B on 09/28/21 at 03:00 PM revealed the facility worked with a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2021-09-30 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 42 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed ensure the safe and sanitary meal preparation, service, and storage when kitchen staff failed to adequately monitor the daily temperatures of the refrigerators and freezers, failed to monitor the chemical sanitization of the low temperature dishwasher each shift, and failed to test the sanitizing solution used to clean surfaces in the kitchen and dining room. These failures had the ability to affect all residents served meals from the kitchen. Findings included: - Observation on 09/27/21 at 10:35 AM revealed no completed logs for the low temperature dishwasher or chemical sanitizer spray could be found in the kitchen. Further observation revealed no parts per million (ppm) test strips could be found in the kitchen in order to ensure the antimicrobial properties/chemical sanitization desired effect. Observation of temperature logs located on the refrigerators and freezers in the kitchen at the time of observation lacked completion of daily temperatures/were not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-09-30 · tag F0730 — pattern
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility census totaled 42 residents. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure five Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) staff reviewed, completed 12 hours of required in-service training annually. Findings included: - Review of staff training records for Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) C (hired on 05/01/20), D (hired 03/31/20), CNA E (09/26/17), CNA F (hired on 01/20/15), and CNA G (hired on 10/01/13) lacked documented evidence of in-service hours totaling 12 hours in a one-year period from hire anniversary date. Interview with Administrative Nurse B on 09/29/21 at 12:31 PM revealed she started working for the facility in March of 2021 and did not have documentation of completed in-services for any of the facility staff prior to her arrival. Administrative Nurse B could provide documentation of completed in-services for the CNAs [listed above] from March through September of 2021. Review of the Facility Assessment reviewed in 2021, lacked documentation regarding required in-service hours for each staff member annually. The facility did not provide a policy regarding…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-09-30 · tag F0943 — pattern
    Give their staff education on dementia care, and what abuse, neglect, and exploitation are; and how to report abuse, neglect, and exploitation.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility census totaled 42 residents. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all facility staff were trained on dementia care and social media annually. Findings included: - Review of the staff training records for Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) C (hired 05/01/20) and CNA G (hired 10/01/13) lacked evidence of dementia care training from 05/01/20 through 09/30/21. Review of the staff training records for CNA E (hired 09/26/17), CNA F (hired 01/20/15), and CNA G (hired 10/01/13) lacked evidence of social media training since hire date through 09/30/21. Interview with Administrative Nurse B on 09/29/21 at 12:31 PM revealed the staff completed social media training only upon hire and not completed each year. Administrative Nurse B said the facility completed all staff in-services in-house and did not utilize online training. The 08/27/21 Facility Assessment documented staff were to complete ANE training, however it did not note the frequency for the training. The Facility Assessment noted the expectation of staff to complete HIPAA training annually and noted…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-09-30 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility census totaled 42 residents (R) with 12 included in the sample and two residents reviewed for transfers out of the facility. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure staff completed notifications to the ombudsman for R38s transfer to the hospital and R45's discharge to another long-term care (LTC) facility. Findings included: - R38's pertinent diagnoses from Physician's Orders in the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) dated 07/19/21 revealed a fracture (broken bone) to his right femur (thigh bone). The 07/16/21 Discharge Assessment Return Anticipated Minimum Data Set (MDS) revealed he discharged to an acute hospital. The 07/16/21 Progress Notes revealed R38 was hospitalized after a fall with fracture due to the resident's non-compliance with ADLs. Review of the facility provided documentation of monthly notifications to the State LTC Ombudsman of transferred/discharged residents from 01/01/20 to 09/01/21, revealed no documentation of ombudsman notification completed for R38's facility-initiated hospitalization transfer. Observation…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-09-30 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility census totaled 42 residents (R) with 12 residents in the sample and one resident reviewed for hospitalization. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to notify R38's representative in writing and complete the bed hold for the resident's facility initiated hospitalization transfer. Findings included: - R38's pertinent diagnoses from Physician's Orders and Progress Note for diagnosis in the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) dated 07/19/21 revealed a fracture (broken bone) to his right femur (thighbone). The 06/08/21 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 15, indicating intact cognition. The resident experienced no falls during the review period. The 07/16/21 Discharge Assessment Return Anticipated MDS revealed he was discharged to an acute hospital. The 09/13/21 Annual MDS revealed a BIMS of 09, indicating moderately impaired cognition. The resident experienced one minor injury fall during the review period. The 09/13/21 ADL Care Area Assessment (CAA) revealed cognitive loss. He may need…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-09-30 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility census totaled 42 residents with 12 residents (R) in the sample. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the accuracy of the completed Minimum Data Set (MDS) regarding falls experienced by R9, which were not noted on the MDS. Findings included: - R9's 09/14/20 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) revealed he experienced no falls in the review period since last Quarterly MDS assessment on 06/07/20. The 06/16/20 at 05:33 AM Fall Investigation and 06/17/20 Fall Risk Data Collection revealed R9 experienced an unwitnessed fall in his bathroom with no injuries. The 06/19/20 at 06:45 PM Fall Investigation and 06/19/20 at 09:50 PM Health Status Note revealed R9 experienced an unwitnessed fall in his room. Observation of 09/27/21 at 01:05 PM revealed R9 sat in his recliner with the call light within reach. Interview with Consultant Nurse staff O on 10/05/21 at 08:43 AM revealed the resident's MDS lookback period for falls was from prior assessment to current assessment and said the 09/14/20 MDS should have indicated two or more non-injury…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-09-30 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility census totaled 42 residents with 12 residents (R) in the sample. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the resident's comprehensive Care Plans reflected the needs of the residents to ensure person-centered care. R10's comprehensive care plan lacked information regarding hospice care, R36's comprehensive care plan lacked information/interventions regarding dialysis (a procedure where impurities or wastes were removed from the blood) services received, and R9's comprehensive care plan lacked revisions related to fall interventions. Findings included: - R10's pertinent diagnoses from Physician's Orders and Progress Note in the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) dated 08/12/21 revealed adult failure to thrive (includes not doing well, feeling poorly, weight loss, poor self-care that could be seen in elderly individuals) and dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion). The 04/30/21 Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of three, indicating…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-09-30 · tag F0661 — isolated
    Ensure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 42 residents, with 12 sampled, including one for discharge to the community. Based on interview and record review the facility failed to complete a discharge summary to include the recapitulation of Resident (R) 45's stay in the discharge summary. Findings included: - R45's pertinent diagnoses from 06/23/20 Physician Order in the electronic medical record (EMR) documented encephalopathy (damage or disease that affects the brain), Dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion) and major depressive disorder (MDD, major mood disorder). The 07/16/21 Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) documented no plans for the resident's discharge. The 07/16/21 Care Area Assessment (CAA) did not trigger for discharge to the community. The 04/15/21 Quarterly MDS documented no plans for discharge. The 07/16/21 Care Plan documented R45 would remain long term in the facility. The Electronic Health Records (EHR) Physician Orders documented an order to discharge to another facility and to continue the current medications dated 07/26/21. R45's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-09-30 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility census totaled 42 residents with 12 residents (R) in the sample and one sampled for hospice care. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure hospice care/services were documented and communicated to staff for the continuity of care regarding R10. Findings included: - R10's pertinent diagnoses from Physician's Orders and Progress Note in the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) dated 08/12/21 revealed adult failure to thrive (includes not doing well, feeling poorly, weight loss, poor self-care that could be seen in elderly individuals) and dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion). The 04/30/21 Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of three, indicating severely impaired cognition. The resident required one staff assistance for walking and had a lower extremity (limb) impairment; she used a wheelchair for mobility. Her life expectancy was noted to be less than six months and received hospice care. The 04/30/21 Cognitive Area Assessment (CAA)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-09-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 42 residents, with 12 sampled and three reviewed for falls. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to adequately complete fall investigations, to include identifying causal factors related to falls and implement interventions to prevent further falls for Resident (R) 4, R9, and R26. Findings included: - R4's pertinent diagnoses from 05/20/20 Physician's Order in the electronic medical records (EMR) included documented: dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion), anoxic (lack of oxygen) brain damage, psychosis (any major mental disorder characterized by a gross impairment in reality testing) and delusional disorder (untrue persistent belief or perception held by a person although evidence shows it was untrue). The 12/16/20 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of three, indicating severely impaired cognition. R4 was able to ambulate around the facility independently. R4 had one fall with injury since previous MDS. The 06/23/21…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-09-30 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility census totaled 42 residents (R) with 12 residents in the sample, and one resident sampled for dialysis services. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to complete pre-dialysis weights and vital signs, assess the dialysis access site, record resident fluid intake, and obtain physician ordered labs for R36. Findings included: - R36's pertinent diagnoses from the Physician's Orders in the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) dated 09/21/21 revealed end-stage renal disease (ESRD, a terminal disease because of irreversible damage to kidneys) and chronic kidney disease (CKD, a condition characterized by a gradual loss of kidney function over time). Review of the 06/10/21 Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 15, indicating intact cognition. Her diagnosis included ESRD and R36 received dialysis. Review of the 09/10/21 Quarterly MDS revealed a BIMS of 15, indicating intact cognition. Her diagnosis included ESRD, and she received dialysis. Review of 05/22/20 Comprehensive Care Plan revealed a revision on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-09-30 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility census totaled 42 residents with 12 residents (R) in the sample and five sampled for medication regimen reviews. Based on interview, observation, and record review the facility failed to maintain documentation of the consultant pharmacist's identified recommendations and failed to act upon recommendations for multiple months for R10, R26, and R31. Findings included: - Resident (R) 10's pertinent diagnoses from Physician's Orders and Progress Note in the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) dated 08/12/21 revealed hyperlipidemia (a condition of elevated blood lipid levels) and atherosclerotic heart disease (a condition which affects the arteries that supply the heart with blood, usually caused by atherosclerosis, a buildup of plaque inside the artery walls). The 04/30/21 Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of three, indicating severely impaired cognition. She had diagnoses of hyperlipidemia and coronary artery disease. The Cognitive Loss Care Area Assessment (CAA) revealed a BIMS of three, she had increased confusion,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-09-30 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 42 residents, with 12 sampled and five reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to follow the physicians' orders regarding R31's diabetes when staff did not document and notify the provider of blood glucose (BG, blood sugar) values outside the designated parameter. The facility further failed to ensure blood pressure parameters for R26 and R31. Findings included: - Review of R26's pertinent diagnoses from the Physician's Orders in the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) dated 08/20/21 documented pneumonia (inflammation of the lungs), major depressive disorder (MDD, major mood disorder), hypertension (HTN; elevated blood pressure), osteoarthritis (degenerative changes to one or many joints characterized by swelling and pain), and Alzheimer's disease (progressive mental deterioration characterized by confusion and memory failure). Review of the 01/06/21 Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) documented R26 had a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) of zero, indicating severely impaired cognition. No…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-09-30 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility census totaled 42 residents with 12 residents (R) in the sample and five sampled for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure an appropriate diagnosis for R10s antipsychotic (class of medications used to treat psychosis and other mental emotional conditions) medications. Findings included: - Resident (R) 10's pertinent diagnoses from Physician's Orders and Progress Note for diagnoses in the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) dated 08/12/21 revealed dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion) and major depressive disorder (MDD, a major mood disorder). The 04/30/21 Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of three, indicating severely impaired cognition. She exhibited delusions with verbal behavioral symptoms directed toward others and rejection of care one to three days of the review period. R10 received daily routine antipsychotic medications in the seven-day review period. The 04/30/21 Psychotropic Care Area…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-09-30 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 42 residents with three residents requiring a pureed diet. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the staff prepared foods by methods which conserve nutritive value, flavor, and appearance. Observation of kitchen staff not following a recipe for the preparation of the pureed lunch menu, resulted in unappetizing and runny food, with a change in nutritive value when staff substituted milk in place of other thinning ingredients as listed in the recipe (such as broth and/or butter), and failed to follow the recipe measurements and staff was eyeballing measurements of ingredients used in the purees, meant to thin or thicken the puree, and failed to serve all items on the menu in puree form or offer substitutes for items she did not puree. Findings included: - Review of the Weekly Menu, Day 17 approved on 04/17/21, documented the lunch meal included country ham, herb stuffing, buttered carrots, roasted brussels sprouts, cornbread and Texas sheet cake. Review of the DiningRD.com Pureed Country Ham Recipe for three…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$100,981 in federal fines across 6 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

  • $26,685 — penalty dated 2025-04-15
  • $26,618 — penalty dated 2025-01-08
  • $13,042 — penalty dated 2024-05-16
  • $16,801 — penalty dated 2024-01-10
  • $13,641 — penalty dated 2023-09-26
  • $4,194 — penalty dated 2023-09-11
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-05-03 for 31 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to TUTERA SENIOR LIVING & HEALTH CARE — 25 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 52.0≈ chain avg
Health inspection 1 of 52.2-1.2 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 51.7+0.3 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 53.0+2.0 vs chain
The other 24 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.0★, per CMS)
1 of 5Bethany Rehab & HccDekalb, IL 1 of 5Carlinville Rehab & HccCarlinville, IL 1 of 5Coulterville Rehab & HccCoulterville, IL 1 of 5Crystal Pines Rehab & HccCrystal Lake, IL 1 of 5Fair Oaks Rehab & HealthcareSouth Beloit, IL 1 of 5Grand Meadows Senior Living & Health CareAsbury, IA 1 of 5Hillsboro Rehab & HccHillsboro, IL 1 of 5Mattoon Rehab & HccMattoon, IL 1 of 5Metropolis Rehab & HccMetropolis, IL 1 of 5Moweaqua Rehab & HccMoweaqua, IL 1 of 5St Paul's Senior CommunityBelleville, IL 1 of 5Windsor Estates Of St CharlesSaint Charles, MO 2 of 5The Village At MissionPrairie Village, KS 3 of 5Carnegie Village Rehabilitation & Health Care CentBelton, MO 3 of 5Dixon Rehab & HccDixon, IL 3 of 5Highland Rehabilitation & Health Care CenterKansas City, MO 3 of 5Lakeland Rehab & Healthcare CenterEffingham, IL 3 of 5Meridian Rehabilitation And Health Care CenterWichita, KS 3 of 5Monterey Park Rehabilitation & Health Care CenterIndependence, MO 3 of 5NorterreLiberty, MO 3 of 5Northland Rehabilitation & Health Care CenterKansas City, MO 3 of 5Stratford Commons Rehab & Health Care CenterOverland Park, KS 3 of 5Tiffany Springs Rehabilitation & Health Care CenteKansas City, MO 5 of 5Charlton Place Rehab And Healthcare CenterDeatsville, AL

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
TUTERA GROUP, INCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST35%since 08/01/2021
WESTVIEW OF DERBY PROPERTY LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST50%since 08/01/2021
BROOKS, KILEYIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 08/01/2021
WALNUT CREEK MANAGEMENT COMPANY LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 08/01/2021

CMS files one row per role, so the 5 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$5.1M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+3.4%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$758K
Related-party expense15% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 66%Medicare 3%Other / private 31%

This home reported $758K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 15% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$232per resident / day
operating cost
$7,042per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$240per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in KS

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Kansas Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Kansas
$8,669/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$9,064/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,975/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 175218. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-03-05, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next