Careage Hills Rehabilitation and Healthcare

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

44.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 32 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.62 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 89% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 7% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 44 beds and averages 37.4 residents a day — about 85% occupied, or roughly 7 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.15 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.90 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.90 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.63 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.36 on weekdays — 22% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 1.00 to 0.65 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 59% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

20 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 8 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2025-12-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, clinical record review, staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide adequate nursing supervision to prevent injuries with transfers using a mechanical lift for 1 of 3 residents reviewed (Residents #1). The facility reported a total census of 33 residents. Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #1 documented diagnoses of Alzheimer's Disease, seizures, cognitive communication deficit and need for assistance with personal care. The MDS showed the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) was not assessed. The MDS showed the Resident depends on staff for eating, oral care, toileting hygiene, bathing, dressing, personal hygiene, bed mobility and all transfers and the Resident depends on staff for wheelchair movement in and out of the facility. Review of Resident #1's Care Plan revealed the following:1. Resident was unable to ambulate initiated 11/1/23.2. Requires total dependence on staff with locomotion using wheelchair…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2024-03-28 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interview, and policy review the facility failed to provide proper transfer techniques while transferring a resident to prevent accidents for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #21) reviewed. The facility reported a census of 30 residents. Findings include: Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #21 to have a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 6 indicating severe cognitive impairment. The MDS further revealed diagnosis of aphasia (loss of ability to understand or express speech), stroke, hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body), difficulty in walking, and need for assistance with personal care. Review of the Electronic Healthcare Record (EHR) tab titled, Progress Notes, revealed and entry from 11/1/23 at 1:44 PM by Staff A Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) that she was summoned to Resident #21 ' s bathroom and found Resident #21 laying on her back on the floor, with the proper footwear on and no gait belt. Staff A further documented…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, staff interviews, and facility policy reviews the facility failed to ensure food was prepared under sanitary conditions. The facility identified a census of 38 residents. Based on observations, staff interviews, and facility policy reviews the facility failed to ensure food was prepared under sanitary conditions. The facility identified a census of 38 residents. Findings include: Observation on 3/4/26 at 12:00 p.m. Staff B, Cook, applied gloves after performing hand hygiene. Staff B with gloved hands grabbed the bread sack and opened the bread sack and poured out about 6 pieces of bread on top of small bowls. Then proceeded to tear up the bread with her soiled gloves and grab the milk jug and pour milk over the bread, then took off the gloves and applied new gloves. Observation on 3/4/25 at 12:30 p.m. Staff B had gloves on and opened the hamburger bun bag and took out the bun with her gloved hand, placed it on the plate, then grabbed the potato chip bag and used her soiled glove hand and grabbed the chips and placed them on the plate. Per the facility Policy…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-05 · tag F0628 — isolated
  Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interview, and facility policy review the facility failed to notify the Long-Term Care Ombudsman of a transfer to a hospital and a discharge to home for 2 of 3 residents (Resident #38 and Resident #43) reviewed. The facility reported a census of 38 residents.Findings include: Review of Resident #38's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #38 was discharged with anticipation to return to the facility. The MDS further revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) was not completed for this MDS. Review of Resident #38's Electronic Healthcare Record (EHR) revealed an entry dated 11/22/25 at 9:29 a.m. that Resident #38 was sent to the emergency room for evaluation. The hospital later notified the facility, Resident #38 was admitted to the hospital. Review of Resident #43's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #43 was discharged , return not anticipated. The MDS further revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-05 · tag F0644 — isolated
  Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to refer 1 resident with a negative Level I result for the Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR), who was later identified with newly evident or possible serious mental disorder, intellectual disability, or other related condition, to the appropriate state-designated authority for Level II PASRR evaluation and determination for 1 out of 1 residents (Resident #7) reviewed for PASRR requirements. The facility reported a census of 38 residents. Findings include: 1. The The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #7 documented diagnoses of psychotic disorder, neurocognitive disorder and depression. The MDS included a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, which indicated no cognitive impairment. The Medical Diagnosis list for Resident #7 revealed the following diagnoses:Delusions, dated 6/6/25,Mild neurocognitive disorder, dated 6/6/25,Major depressive disorder, dated 7/7/25. The Clinical Orders…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-05 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility record review and staff interviews the facility failed to document blood sugars and insulin on the medication administration record (MAR) for 1 out of 1 residents reviewed (Resident #4). The facility reported a census of 38 residents. Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #4 documented diagnoses of diabetes mellitus, renal insufficiency and hypertension. The MDS showed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating intact cognition. Interview with Resident #4 stated that he checks his blood sugar through his glucose monitoring device and notifies the nurse. Resident #4 stated the nurses will dial up the insulin pen and then he self administers it. Review of the Physician Orders revealed Resident #4's orders are as followed:Humulin, inject 3 units subcutaneous (insertion of medications beneath the skin ) (SQ) 3 times a day.Humulin, inject 3 units SQ per sliding scale 3 times a day: 151-200=2U; 201-250=4U;…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure a safe transfer using a mechanical lift for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #11) according to facility policy and manufacturer guidelines. The facility reported a census of 38 residents. Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #11 documented diagnoses of dementia, muscle weakness, and abnormalities of gait and mobility. The MDS showed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 00, which indicated the resident could not complete the BIMS interview. The Care Plan, initiated 7/28/22, for Resident #11 indicated transfers require total dependence with assistance from two staff members using a mechanical lift. Observation on 3/3/26 at 11:55 AM revealed Staff C, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA), and Staff D, CNA, transferred Resident #11 from the bed to the wheelchair using a mechanical lift. During the transfer, Staff C raised the resident from the bed with the mechanical lift while…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, clinical record review, staff interview, and per the current Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines the facility failed to use Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) to prevent the spread of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) and failed to provide proper hand hygiene after catheter care for 1 out 1 resident reviewed (Resident #2). The facility reported a census of 38 residents. Findings include: Observation on 1/21/26 at 10:19 AM revealed Staff E, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA), performed catheter care and emptied the catheter bag for Resident #2 without donning a gown as part of personal protective equipment (PPE) for EBP. After completing care with soiled gloves, Staff E wiped the urine bag spout with an alcohol wipe, pulled the resident's pants down, and collected the urine colander, barrier, and used alcohol wipe. Staff E opened the bathroom door, discarded the barrier and soiled wipe, turned on water, rinsed the colander, and flushed the toilet. Staff E then wrapped the colander in a clean garbage bag, removed the bag from the receptacle,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-09 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
  Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, resident and staff interviews and facility policy the facility failed to provide an adaptive call light for Resident #4 to call for assistance. The facility reported a census of 33 residents. Observation on 12/3/25 at 3:22 p.m., of Resident #4 transferring from her bed to her wheelchair with a mechanical lift. During the transfer Resident #4 revealed she did not have a call light she was able to operate. Resident #4 verbalized she had a button call light but was unable to operate that due to her multiple sclerosis. Resident #4 revealed the facility had given her a pad call light but sometime last week that broke. Resident #4 explained the facility came and took the call light pad and was going to fix the call light and it has not come back. Observation in the room revealed there was no call light or way for Resident #4 to call for assistance in the room. Interview on 12/3/24 at 3:22 p.m., with Staff A, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) and Staff B, CNA, staff confirmed Resident #4 did not have a call light. Staff A showed Resident #4 was given a call light…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-05 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, resident and staff interviews and policy review, the facility failed to complete a wound treatment for 1 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident #1) and failed to complete an assessment for 1 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident #2). The facility reported a census of 34 residents. Findings include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #1 revealed a Brief Interview Mental Status (BIMS) of 15 indicating intact cognition. The MDS revealed diagnoses including type 1 diabetes, pressure ulcer of the right buttock and sacral region. The MDS further revealed the resident was dependent on staff for toileting assistance and personal hygiene. The Care Plan for Resident #1 initiated [DATE] revealed the resident had actual pressure ulcer development and directed staff to administer treatments as ordered. Review of Physician Orders for Resident #1 revealed an order effective [DATE] to treat left ischium (lower and back of the hip bone) with 1/2 strength peroxide and 1/2…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-06 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and staff interview the facility failed to prepare food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 meal. The facility reported a census of 35 residents. Findings include: During observation on 2/5/25 at 11:07 a.m. the Dietary Supervisor (DS) removed his gloves, washed his hands and applied new gloves. The DS and started serving the noon meal, touching plates, utensils, covers on the steam table, diet cards and menus. During the service the DS retrieved a bun out of it's bag wearing the same gloves. He used tongs to put a hamburger on the bun. After sending the hamburger out, he changed his gloves without washing his hands. The DS continued to serve, touching multiple surfaces. He paused to make a peanut butter sandwich wearing the same gloves. He retrieved a package of cheese from the refrigerator and removed a slice wearing the same gloves. He served additional hamburgers handling the buns with gloves on that he had touched other surfaces with. On 2/6/25 at 2:14 p.m. the Dietician confirmed gloves that touched other surfaces could…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-06 · tag F0625 — isolated
  Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interview and policy review the facility failed to obtain bed hold notifications for 1 of 1 resident reviewed (Resident #6). The facility reported a census of 35. Findings include: Review of Resident #6's Electronic Healthcare Record (EHR) revealed Resident #6 was in the hospital from [DATE] to 5/16/24 and 5/17/24 to 5/18/24. Further review of the EHR page titled, Clinical Census confirmed the Resident was in the hospital on these dates. Review for bed hold notification for Resident #6 revealed there was no bed hold form to review for the dates of hospitalization. During an interview on 2/6/25 at 12:49 PM the Administrator stated these two bed holds were missed. The Administrator stated we had started a Performance Improvement Program (PIP) after our last annual survey. The Administrator stated that she was the person auditing the bedholds at that time and that they were missed and weren't followed back up on. She stated that the process is anyone that goes out needs to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to THE ENSIGN GROUP — 342 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 3 rows in the source record cover these 2 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $388K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 11% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IA