Parke View Rehabilitation & Care Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

41.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 115 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 75.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 53 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.61 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 88% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 2% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 86 beds and averages 75.9 residents a day — about 88% occupied, or roughly 10 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.90 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.60 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.48 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.48 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.07 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.62 to 0.57 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 42% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

20 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 10 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · D2025-08-21 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure dignity of residents when staff enter their rooms without knocking and waiting for acknowledgement to enter. This was true for 5 out of 6 resident rooms observed during afternoon CNA rounds. This deficient practice placed residents at risk of embarrassment and diminished sense of self-worth. Findings include:Resident #4 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including diabetes and heart failure.On 8/18/25 at 2:02 PM, observed CNA #1 walk into Resident #4's room without knocking and then he continued down the hall entering rooms 124, 125, 126, 127, and 130 without knocking.On 8/18/25 at 2:13 PM, CNA #1 stated he was late getting off shift and will remember to knock before entering next time. On 8/18/25 at 2:22 PM, the DON stated CNAs should always knock before entering a resident's room and had not.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-21 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents Minimum Data Set (MDS) had correct assessment information. This was true for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #8) reviewed for accuracy of MDS assessments. This deficient practice created the potential for residents to have their mental health needs not met due to inaccurate assessments. Findings include: Resident #8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including acute hepatitis C (the initial phase of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, typically lasting for the first six months after exposure) and alcoholic cirrhosis of the liver without ascites (a condition where the liver is scarred due to excessive alcohol consumption, but without the accumulation of fluid in the abdomen).Resident #8's had a new diagnosis of bipolar disorder added on 6/26/25. A significant change in status assessment had not been submitted to update Resident #8's MDS.On 8/19/25 at 2:35 PM, the facility social services staff #1 stated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-21 · tag F0646 — isolated
  Notify the appropriate authorities when residents with MD or ID services has a significant change in condition.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, Idaho Medicaid Plan Benefit 16.03.26.475.03, observation, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to update a residents' Level I PASRR (Preadmission Screening and Resident Review) with new diagnosis which required further screening, a Level II PASRR to be completed. This was true for 3 of 4 residents (#7, #8, and #13) whose PASRR records were reviewed. This deficient practice had the potential for negative outcomes if the resident was not assessed and cared for or monitored due to inaccurate assessments. Findings include:The Idaho Medicaid Plan Benefit 16.03.26.475.03 dated 7/1/25, documented under change in status, resident reviews for residents with MI or DD must occur and a new determination made after any significant change in their physical or mental condition NFs must notify the Department of any changes within two (2) working days of occurrence when any significant change requires new or increased specialized services.a. Resident #7 was initially admitted to the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-21 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on the facility routine standing orders, record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to follow the facility bowel care standing order of delivering specific medications when residents do not have BM within 72 hours for 2 of 8 residents (#7 and #10) who records were reviewed for bowel and bladder care. This failed practice created the potential for residents to experience discomfort when medications were not administered according to the physician's order. Findings include:The facility routine standing orders for nursing home dated 8/28/24, documented for resident constipation the following medications may be used:- Miralax 17gm mix with 8oz fluid QD PRN constipation - Senna 8.6mg 1-2 tabs QD PRN for constipation. - Dulcolax 5mg 1 tab QD PRN - Magnesium Citrate 1 bottle QD PRN constipationa. Resident #7 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including stroke and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (a progressive lung…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-21 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure controlled medications were tracked and kept secure from potential theft and/or diversion. This was true for 2 of 3 medication carts reviewed. This failure created the potential for undetected misuse and/or diversion of controlled medications and had the potential to affect all residents who received controlled medication in the facility. Findings include: On 8/18/25 at 3:49 PM, during East Hall medication cart audit, observed the narcotic accountability record, dated 8/1/25 to 8/18/25, with 3 licensed nurse signatures not documented. On 8/18/25 at 3:52 PM, LPN #2 stated two nurses should have signed the narcotic accountability record when they accepted the medication cart or released the medication cart. On 8/20/25 at 1:50 PM, during North Hall medication cart audit, observed the narcotic accountability record, dated 8/1/25 to 8/20/25, with 1 licensed nurse signature not documented. On 8/20/25 at 1:55 PM, RN #2 stated two nurses should have signed the narcotic accountability record when they…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-21 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure medication carts were locked when unattended. This was observed in 1 of 3 medication carts. This failure created the potential for residents to obtain prescribed medications used for other residents and presented the risk for cross-contamination of medications stored in the cart. Findings include:On 8/18/25 at 9:03 AM, observed an unlocked and unattended medication cart on the TCU hall outside of the dining room. RN #1 came out of the dining room after about 3 minutes and said she was just inside the dining room but stated the medication cart should have been locked. On 8/18/25 at 12:33 PM, observed an unlocked and unattended medication cart on the 200 Hall for over 3 minutes. While standing next to the medication cart, no facility staff were visible to the surveyor at that time. RN #1 was in the chart room on the 200 Hall and stated she did forget to lock the medication cart.On 8/18/25 at 4:08 PM, the DON stated medication carts are to always be locked when unattended and had not been.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure adherence to infection control and prevention practices to provide a safe and sanitary environment when staff did not perform hand hygiene prior to providing care from resident-to-resident. This failure had the potential to impact 3 of 3 residents (#5, #17 and #71) observed during resident care, placing them at risk for cross-contamination and infection. Findings include: On 8/20/25 at 8:40 AM, surveyor observed CNA #2 enter Resident #5's room and obtain vital signs; blood pressure, oxygen saturation, and temperature, however CNA #2 did not perform hand hygiene on entering, during care, or exiting Resident #5's room. CNA #2 proceeded down the hall to Resident #71's room.On 8/20/25 at 8:55 AM, surveyor observed CNA #2 enter Resident #71's room and obtain vital signs; blood pressure, oxygen saturation, and temperature, however CNA #2 did not perform hand hygiene on entering, during care, or exiting Resident #71's room. CNA #2 proceeded down the hallway to Resident #17's room.On 8/20/25 at 9:17 AM, surveyor…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-21 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
  Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide a safe and functional environment. This was true for 2 of 2 residents (#2 and #76) whose sharps containers were observed to be overfilled. This failure had the potential for injury and infections. Findings include:On 8/18/25 at 2:43 PM, observed in resident #2's room with LPN #1 present, the sharps container was filled past the full line.On 8/18/25 at 2:45 PM, LPN #1 stated the sharps container should have been changed when it was full.On 8/18/25 at 2:48 PM, observed in resident #76's room with LPN #1 present, the sharps container was filled past the full line.On 8/18/25 at 2:49 PM, LPN #1 stated the sharps container should have been changed when it was full.On 8/19/25 at 9:38 AM, the DON stated the sharps containers should have been changed when full.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-08-22 · tag F0554 — isolated
  Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents who self-administer medications had been assessed and evaluated for cognitive and physical ability to self-administer medications and reviewed by the Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) prior to residents self-administering medications for two of two residents (Resident (R) 38 and R11) observed self-administering medications. As a result of this deficient practice, medications may or may not actually be correctly administered. Findings below: 1. Review of R38's admission Record located in the electronic medical record (EMR) under the Profile tab revealed an admission date of 01/11/19 and readmission on [DATE] with medical diagnosis including cerebral infarction. Review of R38's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) located in the EMR under the MDS tab with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 06/16/24, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13 out of 15 indicating R38 was cognitively…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-08-22 · tag F0645 — isolated
  PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure that a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) level I assessment was completed after the resident remained in the facility past the initial 30 day exception for one residents (Resident (R)31 out of one residents out of a total sample of 22 residents reviewed for PASARR level I screenings which had the potential to prevent or delay additional services to a resident that may qualify for a level II. Findings include: 1. Review of R31's undated Face sheet, located in the Profile tab of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including schizoaffective disorder, major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, and post-traumatic stress disorder. Review of R31's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) under the MDS tab of the EMR, with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 07/01/24, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), score of 15 out of 15 which…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to THE ENSIGN GROUP — 342 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 17 rows in the source record cover these 13 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 74% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $894K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 11% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in ID