Ironwood Rehabilitation and Care Center
2200 Ironwood Place, Coeur d'Alene, ID 83814 · For profit - Corporation · 80 certified beds · (208) 667-6486 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Sep 2024
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (37) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (62%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 2 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 2 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 1 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 15.5% | 15.6% | 15.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 3.2% | 5.2% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.4% | 1.2% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.5% | 2.0% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 20.7% | 15.1% | 6.5% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.9% | 3.0% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 17.6% | 16.1% | 16.1% | typical |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 18.6% | 16.3% | 18.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 96.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 5.5% | 3.2% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 18.3% | 22.1% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 23.2% | 20.1% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 3.9% | 1.8% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 82.4% | 86.5% | 79.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 34.0% | 17.7% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 17.9% | 12.3% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 0.99 | 1.17 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.54 | 1.66 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
47.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 136 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 53.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 43 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.37 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 64% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 4% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 47.8%CMS range 39.6–54.7 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 9.7%CMS range 7.1–12.6 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 53.5% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 60.5% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 51.2% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 92.6% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 96.4% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 1.4% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 2.8% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.0%CMS range 3.6–10.1 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.89 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 80 beds and averages 67.1 residents a day — about 84% occupied, or roughly 13 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.71 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.79 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.14 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.24 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.89 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.90 to 0.51 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 62% is well above the national median of 45%. 3 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
37 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 26 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-09-26 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of medical records, the State Survey Agency's Long-Term Care Reporting Portal, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents' rights were protected to be free from abuse and neglect. This was true for 2 of 9 residents (#69 and #72) reviewed for abuse and neglect. This failure placed all residents at risk of ongoing abuse and neglect, and potential physical and psychosocial harm. Findings include: 1. Resident #72 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including osteoporosis with fracture to right humerus, right pelvis, and vertebra(e), hypertension, and bilateral hearing loss. Resident #72 passed away on 5/1/24. A facility reported incident investigation, initiated 4/12/24, documented Resident #72 reported to the facility that, on 4/12/24, PT #1 came to her room to take her to a therapy session. Resident #72 declined since she was preparing to move to another room. PT #1 responded by throwing a soiled bed pan and a urinal at Resident #72…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-01 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, SOM Appendix PP, and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to provide quality care for residents. This was true for 4 of 20 (#2, #4, #8, and #51) whose records were reviewed. This deficient practice created the potential for harm when Resident #2's bowel protocol was not followed, when staff did not follow physician's orders for Resident #4 and #8, and when Resident #51 did not have a skin assessments completed. Findings include:SOM Appendix PP updated 4/25/25 documented quality of care is a fundamental principle applying to all treatment and care provided to facility residents where the facility must ensure residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' choices. 1. Resident #51 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including obesity, Parkinson's disease, cognitive communication deficit, bipolar disorder, and borderline personality…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-05-01 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, policy review, resident interview, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were provided a safe, comfortable, and homelike environment. This was true for 2 of 2 residents (#13 and #30) whose rooms were observed with wear or damage and for residents living in 2 of 3 Halls (South and East Halls) who experienced uneven flooring. These deficient practices created the potential for the residents to experience accidents and psychosocial harm due to the conditions of the rooms and uneven flooring. Findings include:1. a. Resident #13 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including, atrial fibrillation (irregular heartbeat), and dementia (a progressive irreversible syndrome causing decline in memory, thinking, and daily functioning). On 4/27/26 at 12:48 PM, observed Resident #13's room, which had at least 7 holes in the wall over the bed and scattered areas of missing paint on the same wall. On the wall edge next to bed, a large area of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-01 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were treated with dignity and respect. This was true for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #50) observed during cares. This deficient practice created the potential for psychosocial harm if Resident #50 experienced embarrassment or lack of self-esteem. Findings include: Resident #50 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses, including Down Syndrome and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia (low levels of oxygen in the blood).On 4/30/26 at 1:23 PM, RN #2 assisted by CNA #1 performed wound care to Resident #50's bottom. RN #1 was also observed to clean Resident #50's penis. Resident #50's window curtain was not drawn to provide privacy. He was visible to the outside while receiving wound care.On 4/30/26 at 1:42 PM, RN #2 stated he did not notice Resident #50's curtain was not drawn while he was providing wound care. RN #2 stated the curtain should have been drawn to provide…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-01 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to provide self-administration of medication assessments. This was true for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #5) whose record was reviewed for self-administration of medications. This deficient practice created the potential for harm if Resident #5 took too much or too little of his inhaled medication, or suffered adverse effects, such as oral thrush, due to lack of assessment. Findings include:Resident #5 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including quadriplegia (a medical condition involving paralysis of all four limbs and the torso, often caused by spinal cord injury, stroke, or disease), muscle weakness, stage 4 pressure ulcer of right buttock, anxiety, depression, emphysema (a chronic, progressive lung disease that makes it hard to breathe by destroying the delicate air sacs (alveoli) in the lungs), and sleep apnea (serious disorder where breathing repeatedly stops and starts during…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-01 · tag F0628 — isolatedProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of records and staff interviews it was determined the facility failed to ensure a bed-hold notice was provided to a resident and/or their representatives. This was true for 1 of 3 resident (Resident #50) whose records was reviewed. This failure created the potential for psychosocial distress if Resident #50 could not return to the facility following hospitalization. Findings include:The State Operation Manual Appendix PP, issued 7/23/25, documented At the time of transfer of a resident for hospitalization or therapeutic leave, a nursing facility must provide to the resident and the resident representative written notice which specifies the duration of the bed-hold policy.Resident #50 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses, including Down Syndrome and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia (low levels of oxygen in the blood).A Nursing Notes dated 3/30/26, documented Resident #50 was noted to have involuntary movement. Resident #50 had extreme…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-01 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement residents' comprehensive person-centered care plan. This was true for 1 of 20 residents (Resident #6) whose care plan was reviewed. This deficient practice placed Resident #6 at risk for their health and wellbeing with negative outcomes if services were not provided or provided incorrectly. Findings include: The facility's policy titled, Comprehensive Person-Centered Care Planning stated, 'It is the policy of this facility that the interdisciplinary team (IDT) shall develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment. The IDT team will also develop and implement a baseline care plan for each resident, within 48 hours of admission, that includes minimum healthcare information necessary to properly care for each resident and instructions…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-01 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure staff administered and disposed of medications according to professional standards. This was true for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #79) observed during medication administration, and 1 of 6 residents (Resident #11) whose medication regimen were reviewed. These failures created the risk for harm when Resident #79's medication was not disposed of appropriately and when the nurse did not follow the physician's order for two medications, and a risk for harm to Resident #11 when two of their medication orders were written to administer by the wrong route. Findings include: -The National Library of Medicine web page titled Nursing Rights of Medication Administration, accessed 5/5/26, documented the five traditional rights for medication administration are, Right Patient, Right Drug, Right Route, Right Time, Right Dose. -PharmcareUSA - Medication Disposal in Long Term Care, accessed 5/5/26, documented, When…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-01 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of records and interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents who were dependent on staff for activities of daily living (ADLs) received bath/shower assistance. This was true for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #20) whose ADL record was reviewed. This deficient practice created the potential for Resident #20 to experience diminished self-worth, embarrassment, and an increased risk for developing skin conditions. Findings include: Resident #20 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses, including hemiplegia (paralysis on one side of the body) and hemiparesis (weakness on one side of the body) following a stroke, diabetes, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), and dysarthria (slurred, slow, or difficult to understand speech).An MDS Comprehensive assessment dated [DATE], documented Resident #20 was cognitively intact.On 4/29/26 at 3:44 PM, Resident #20 stated she was to be showered two times a week every Sunday and Thursday, but she only receives one shower a week.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, SOM Appendix PP, and resident and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to assess the safety of a resident electing to smoke. This was true for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #80) whose record was reviewed for safe smoking assessments. This deficient practice created the potential for harm if a resident was not appropriately assessed for safety related to smoking. Findings include:SOM Appendix PP, updated 7/23/25, documented assessment of the resident's capabilities and deficits determines if supervision while smoking is necessary.Resident #80 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and re-admitted on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including COPD, chronic bronchitis, nicotine dependence, depression, anxiety, and mood disorder.On 4/27/26 at 3:51 PM, Resident #80 asked the surveyor to unlock the nursing cart so she could get her cigarettes.On 4/27/26 at 5:06 PM, the facility identified Resident #80 as one of the facility's resident's who chose to smoke. A Smoking Assessment,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-01 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and resident and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to provide respiratory care as ordered by the physician. This was true for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #5) whose record was reviewed for oxygen therapy. This deficient practice created the potential for harm if resident's oxygen therapy did not follow physician's orders. Findings include: Resident #5 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including quadriplegia, muscle weakness, stage 4 pressure ulcer of right buttock, anxiety, depression, emphysema, and sleep apnea.a. A physician's order dated 12/3/25 documented Resident #5 to receive oxygen at 0-4 LPM, as needed for SOB related to respiratory failure with hypoxia.On 4/27/26 at 3:38 PM, Resident #5's nasal cannula was observed hanging over the oxygen condenser without any covering on it.On 4/27/26 at 3:40 PM, Resident #5 stated he had used his nasal cannula the night before.On 4/28/26 at 9:43 AM, LPN #2 was asked to verify if…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 26 citations
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-01 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure medications were stored securely. This was true for 1 of 3 medication carts observed (North Hall Med Cart). This failure created the potential for harm related to unmonitored use of medications. Findings include: On 4/30/26 at 8:59 AM, the medication cart on the North Hall was observed to be unlocked and unattended. On 4/30/26 at 9:03 AM, LPN #1 returned to the medication cart. LPN #1 stated the cart was locked and attempted to demonstrate by pulling on a drawer handle, the drawer opened. LPN #1 stated the cart locked on a timer and she thought the cart was locked when she stepped away. LPN #1 stated she did not know how long the timer on the cart took to lock when left unattended and added she should have double checked it. On 4/30/26 at 9:59 AM, the CRN stated medication carts must be locked when the staff leave it unattended.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-01 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, it was determined, the facility failed to ensure a residents medical record was complete and accurately documented. This was true for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #11) whose medication regimen were reviewed. This failure created the potential for poor continuity of care and medication error when Resident #11's medication administration record (MAR) did not record their medications were not administered due to a hospitalization. Findings include: Resident #11 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including emphysema, muscle weakness, and a need for assistance with personal care. Resident #11's MAR documented, on 4/16/26, their midday and bedtime medications were not administered and on 4/17/26, their early morning medications were not administered. Resident #11's MAR did not include documentation of a code recording why the medications were not administered and the spaces for documentation were left blank. On 4/30/26 at 4:52 PM, the DON stated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-01 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of CDC guidance, and interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure an infection control program was implemented. This was true for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #37) whose intravenous site was observed, and 1 of 1 staff (RN #2) who was observed while providing wound care to Resident #50. This deficient practice created the potential for Resident #37 to develop an infection to his IV site and the spread of infection due to cross contamination when RN #2 did not perform hand hygiene when changing gloves. Findings include: The CDC webpage titled Clinical Safety: Hand Hygiene for Healthcare Workers was accessed on 5/5/26, documented gloves were not a substitute for hand hygiene. The CDC recommended the following:-Perform hand hygiene before donning gloves and touching the patient or the patient's surroundings.-Always clean your hands after removing gloves.The facility's Infection Control policy revised 1/26, documented hand hygiene should be performed before donning sterile…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-01 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were provided with the pneumococcal vaccine when requested. This was true for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #6) whose medical records were reviewed for pneumococcal immunization. This failure created the potential for Resident #6 to have an increased risk of pneumococcal pneumonia (a serious bacterial lung infection) and the potential for severe illness or death. Findings include: The facility's policy, titled Immunizations-Residents, dated 1/26 documented, It is the policy of this facility to offer and administer influenza, pneumococcal, and COVID-19 immunization to eligible residents after providing education on the risks and potential side effects of the vaccine(s) and obtaining consent. Resident #6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including fracture of left tibia, stroke, unsteadiness on feet, need for assistance with personal care, and muscle weakness…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-09-26 · tag F0801 — widespreadEmploy sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on documentation and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skill sets to carry out the functions of food and nutrition services, including resident assessments, individual plans of care, and the number, acuity, and diagnoses of the facility's resident population. These deficiencies had the potential to affect all residents requiring medical nutrition therapy, nutritional assessments, and appropriate supplementation and dietary interventions. Findings include: The State Operations Manual, Appendix PP, revised 8/8/24, documented, if a qualified dietitian or other clinically qualified nutrition professional is not employed full-time, the facility must designate a person to serve as the director of food and nutrition services. The director of food and nutrition services must at a minimum meet one of the following qualifications: - A certified dietary manager. - A certified food service manager, or - Has similar national certification for food service management and safety from a national…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-26 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, it was determined the facility failed to treat each resident with respect and dignity that promoted enhancement of his/her quality of life and dining experience. This deficiency created the potential for psychosocial harm if the residents felt excluded from the dining experience. This was true for 3 of 24 residents (#1, #17, and #28) who were observed eating in the dining room. The findings include: The facility posted the following meal times for the dining room: Breakfast: 7:30 AM Lunch: 12:00 PM Dinner: 5:30 PM The following residents did not receive their meal in a timely manner, or did not receive their meal at the same time as the other residents at the same table: Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including GERD, multiple sclerosis, and depression. Resident #17 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including heart failure, hypertension, and end stage renal disease. Resident #28 was admitted to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-09-26 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — patternProvide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, policy review, and staff interview the facility failed to ensure staff provided meal service according to the facility's posted mealtime schedule. This failure created the potential for 69 residents to experience poor quality of life, potential nutritional issues, and complications with medications required to be taken with meals if waiting more than 45 minutes to receive their meals. Findings include: A posted dining schedule at the front entrance of the facility documented: - Breakfast at 7:30 AM - Lunch at 12:00 PM - Dinner at 5:30 PM On 9/22/24 at 12:30 PM, during the lunch dining room observation, residents were seated for the lunch meal at 12:00 PM. At 12:35 PM it was observed that the first tray of food was delivered to residents in the dining room. The last meal was delivered to dining room residents was at 12:53 PM. On 9/24/24 at 8:00 AM, the following was observed during the second kitchen inspection: - 7:30 PM - Residents are seated in the dining room for their breakfast meal. - 8:00 AM - Dining room service begins. - 8:07 AM - Meal service begins…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-09-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure the kitchen equipment and environment was maintained, clean, and food was stored in a safe and sanitary manner. These deficiencies had the potential to affect the 69 residents who consumed food prepared by the facility. This placed residents at risk for potential contamination of food and adverse health outcomes, including food-borne illnesses. Findings include: The FDA (Food Drug Administration) Food Code Section 3-501.17 Ready-to-Eat, TCS (time/temperature control for safety) food, date marking, states marking the date or day the original container is opened in a food establishment, with a procedure to discard the food on or before the last date or day by which the food must be consumed on the premises, sold, or discarded. The FDA Food Code Section 6-501.12 Cleaning, Frequency and Restrictions, states cleaning of the physical facilities is an important measure in ensuring the protection and sanitary preparation of food. A regular cleaning schedule should be established and followed to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-09-26 · tag F0920 — patternProvide at least one room set aside to use as a resident dining room and for activities, that is a good size, with good lighting, air flow and furniture.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed ensure Activity Room has adequate and comfortable lighting for the residents to enjoy their activity. This failure had the potential for residents to experienced psychosocial harm if they were unable to perform their independent functioning and task performance. Findings include: On 9/23/24 at 2:50 PM, Resident #40 asked the surveyor to visit the Activity Room. On 9/23/24 at 2:59 PM, the facility's Bistro which was being use by the facility as their Activity Room was observed to have dim lighting. There were missing light bulbs and multiple lights were out on the track lighting. On 9/24/24 at 2:26 PM, the Maintenance Director stated he was unable to replace the light tracks because it was no longer available in the area. The Maintenance Director stated he reported it to the previous administrator, and he was told it would be replaced during the remodeling of the facility. On 9/24/24 at 2:41 PM, the Activity Director (AD) stated residents expressed concerns about the lighting in the Activity Room…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-26 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, record review, document review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure allegations of sexual abuse were reported to the Administrator and, within two hours, to the State Agency. This was true for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #13) reviewed for abuse and neglect. This deficient practice created the potential for psychosocial harm to Resident #13 whose sexual abuse allegation was not reported and investigated thoroughly. Findings include: The facility's Abuse Prohibition policy and procedure, dated 7/1/20, documented the center prohibits the abuse, neglect, and exploitation of residents and misappropriation of resident property by anyone, including staff, resident representative/family, and friends. The policy also stated all alleged violations would be reported immediately, but not later than two hours after all allegation was made, if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse or result in serious bodily injury, or not later than 24 hours if the events that cause…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-26 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, record review, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure an alleged allegation of sexual abuse was thoroughly investigated. This was true for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #13) reviewed for abuse and neglect. This deficient practice created the potential for Resident #13 to continue to be sexually abused and experience physical and/or psychosocial harm. Findings include: The facility's Abuse Prohibition policy and procedure, dated 7/1/20, documented a resident has the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property and exploitation, and to have all allegations thoroughly investigated. The policy also stated all documents would be retained to show all alleged violations were thoroughly investigated. Resident #13 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including dementia and anxiety. A Quarterly MDS assessment, dated 7/28/24, documented Resident #13 was severely cognitively impaired. A progress note, dated 5/13/24…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-26 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, policy review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure resident care plans were revised to reflect current needs and interventions. This was true for 2 of 18 residents (#32 and #42) whose care plans were reviewed. This placed residents at risk of adverse outcomes if care and services were not provided due to care plans not being revised as residents' needs changed. Findings include: The facility's Care Planning Process policy, revised 5/19/23, documented care plans will be updated in regard to the needs, problems, strength, goals and interventions of the residents at least quarterly, annually, or with significant change. 1. Resident #42, was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including diabetes, atrial fibrillation (irregular heartbeat), anemia, and obstructive sleep apnea. On 9/23/24 at 3:05 PM, Resident #42 stated, I'm supposed to be tested for a BiPAP. I only got a follow-up appointment today that said I need to go to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-26 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure professional standards of practice were followed for 1 of 18 residents (Resident #42) reviewed for standards of practice. Resident #42 was not evaluated for a skin condition. This deficient practice created a potential for harm if care and services were not provided. Findings include: Resident #42, was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including diabetes, atrial fibrillation (irregular heart beat), anemia, and obstructive sleep apnea. On 9/24/24 at 11:39 AM, Resident #42 was observed scratching at scabbed sores on her upper right arm. Resident #42 stated she is a picker/scratcher and that she suspects some of her medication may be causing a problem. A review of progress notes from 9/15/24, documented that the physician provided a follow-up visit for a skin assessment in the bilateral groin area, but nothing related to itching arms. On 9/26/24 at 10:30 AM, RN #3 stated that the CNA's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-26 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolatedProvide appropriate foot care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure podiatry (foot) services were provided as ordered for 2 of 2 residents (#13 and #61) reviewed for podiatry care. This deficient practice created the potential for residents to experience physical complications related to elongated and/or ingrown toenails and poor circulation. Findings include: 1. Resident #13 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of heart disease. A Quarterly MDS assessment, dated 7/28/24, documented Resident #13 was severely cognitively impaired. A physician's order, dated 7/12/24, documented an order for a podiatry referral. A physician's order, dated 7/31/24, documented a second order for a podiatry referral related to an ingrown right great toenail. A progress note, dated 7/18/24, documented, Received a referral for podiatry. When I talked to [POA] about upcoming appointments she specifically asked that [Resident #13] to not go out on appointments anymore…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-26 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents receiving PRN alprazolam (anti-anxiety medication) had clear indication for the use of the medication and clinical rationale supporting the continued use of the medication beyond 14 days. This was true for 1 of 6 (Resident #32) reviewed for unnecessary medications. This deficient practice had the potential for harm should residents received psychotropic medications that are unwarranted and used for excessive duration. Findings include: The State Operations Manual, Appendix PP, revised 8/8/24, documented PRN orders for anti-psychotropic drugs are limited to 14 days unless the attending physician or prescribing practitioner believes that it is appropriate for the PRN order to be extended beyond 14 days, he or she should document their rationale in the resident's record and indicate the duration for the PRN order. Resident #32 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including anxiety. A…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-10-22 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, policy review, I&A report review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure professional standards of practice were followed related to ensuring residents were free from significant medication errors, neurological checks were completed, and physician orders were followed. This was true for 4 of 13 residents (#2, #10, #38, and #41) reviewed for quality of care. Specifically: * Resident #2 was at risk for deteriorating effects of his severe PVD (Peripheral Vascular Disease - a circulatory problem in which narrowed arteries reduce blood flow to the limbs, leading to pain and the potential for non-healing wounds and tissue death) when he did not receive a referral to a vascular surgeon and a podiatrist as ordered by his physician. * Resident #41 and Resident #38 were at risk for undetected neurological impairment when the facility did not initiate neurological assessments in a timely manner or complete the neurological assessments after unwitnessed falls. * Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-10-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, policy review, and resident and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure infection control and prevention practices related to hand hygiene were followed. This was true for 7 of 7 residents (#10, #13, #22, #32, #33, #39, and #44) observed for hand hygiene prior to meals being served and after toileting. This failure placed residents, staff and visitors entering the facility at increased risk of infection due to cross-contamination. Findings include: The facility's Handwashing/Hand Hygiene policy, revised August 2019, directed staff to perform hand hygiene before and after direct contact with residents, before moving from a contaminated body site to a clean body site during resident care, after contact with a resident's skin, and before and after handling food. This policy was not followed. 1. During a meal service observation on 10/18/21 from 5:45 PM to 6:15 PM, the following was observed: - At 5:45 PM, the SSD was observed delivering a meal tray to Resident #32. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-10-22 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, policy review, and resident family and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure a resident's physician, family, and/or representative were notified when the resident had a significant change in condition. This was true for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #41) whose records were reviewed for changes in condition. This failed practice had the potential to cause delayed care and treatment resulting from lack of notification to the physician and/or family of her significant weight loss and a fall. This deficient practice placed Resident #41 at risk of inadequate care due to the lack of physician involvement and resulted in the inability of her family to advocate and support her when her health declined. Findings include: The facility's policy for Physician Notification of Resident Change in Condition, undated, documented when there was a non-critical change in the resident's physical, mental or psychosocial status, the physician and resident's representative were notified…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-10-22 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, record review, staff interview, and review of Incident and Accident (I&A) reports, it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were free from abuse. This was true for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #13) reviewed for abuse. The facility failed to ensure Resident #13 was not abused by other residents. This failure resulted in the potential for residents to be subjected to ongoing abuse and potential harm. Findings include: The facility's policy, titled Prevention and Reporting: Resident Mistreatment, Neglect, Abuse, Including Injuries of Unknown Source, and Misappropriation of Resident Property, undated, stated, A resident has the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property, and exploitation. The policy defined physical abuse as including hitting, slapping, pinching, scratching, spitting, holding roughly, etc., by anyone. The policy stated the facility was to identify, assess, care plan interventions, and monitor residents whose behaviors might be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-10-22 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, record review, policy review, and review of grievances, it was determined the facility failed to report allegations of potential abuse to the State Survey Agency within 2 hours. This affected 1 of 4 residents (Resident #50) who were reviewed for abuse/neglect. This deficient practice created the potential for harm if allegations were not acted upon in a timely manner and the abuse/neglect continued. Findings include: The facility's Prevention and Reporting: Resident Mistreatment, Neglect, Abuse Including Injuries of Unknown Source, and Misappropriation of Resident Property policy, undated, documented verbal abuse included using disparaging and derogatory terms toward residents or their families or within their hearing distance, regardless of their age, ability to comprehend or disability, that would demean or humiliate, resulting in pain or mental anguish. The policy documented alleged violations were to be reported immediately to the Administrator and State Survey Agency, but no later…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-10-22 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, record review, grievance review, and policy review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure an allegation of potential verbal abuse was investigated. This was true for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #50) reviewed for abuse/neglect. This deficient practice placed Resident #50 at risk of further abuse and other residents in the facility at risk of abuse. Findings include: The facility's Prevention and Reporting: Resident Mistreatment, Neglect, Abuse Including Injuries of Unknown Source, and Misappropriation of Resident Property policy, undated, documented residents had the right to be free from abuse and neglect. The policy stated all alleged violations were thoroughly investigated and documents were retained showing a thorough investigation of all alleged violations. The policy also documented verbal abuse included using disparaging and derogatory terms to the resident. This policy was not followed. Resident #50 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-10-22 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, policy review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were provided with baths or showers consistent with their needs. This was true for 2 of 13 residents (#13, and #42) reviewed for activities of daily living. This failure created the potential for residents to experience embarrassment, isolation, decreased sense of self-worth, and/or skin impairment, due to lack of personal hygiene. Findings include: The facility's Resident Hygiene policy documented every resident should be assisted in maintaining healthy hygiene. The policy stated residents should receive routine daily care and regular baths or showers. Refusals of care were to be documented. This policy was not followed. 1. Resident #13 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including unspecified dementia and aphasia (loss of ability to understand or express speech). Resident #13's quarterly MDS assessment, dated 8/10/21, documented she was severely cognitively impaired.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-10-22 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, policy review, I&A report review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were provided sufficient supervision to prevent falls. This was true for 1 of 13 residents (#38) reviewed for falls. This deficient practice placed Resident #38 at risk of serious injuries and hospitalization when he sustained five falls within less than a month, including one fall a day for three consecutive days, resulting in multiple skin injuries. Findings include: The facility's policy for Accident and Incident Report, Investigation, Review, and Analysis, direct the staff to evaluate the factors leading to a resident fall and provide appropriate interventions to prevent future occurrences. The proper action following a fall included the following: * Ascertaining whether there were injuries and providing treatment as necessary. * Deterring what may have caused or contributed to the fall. * Addressing the contributing factors of the fall. * Revising the care plan and/or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-10-22 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure a resident's urinary catheter needs were met in accordance with professional standards of nursing practice. This was true for 1 of 7 residents (Resident #20) reviewed for urinary catheters. This failed practice created the potential for harm and development of urinary tract infections due to improper handling of the urinary catheter. Findings include: Resident #20 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder (lack of bladder control due to brain, spinal cord, or nerve problems) and paraplegia (paralysis of the legs and lower body). A quarterly MDS assessment, dated 10/8/21, documented Resident #20 had an indwelling catheter (a hollow, partially flexible tube that collects urine from the bladder and leads to a drainage bag) for urinary incontinence and required extensive assistance from two staff members for his ADLs except for eating. An…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-10-22 · tag F0700 — isolatedTry different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure a alternatives to bed rails were attempted, and consent was obtained from the resident or the resident's legal representative prior to placing bed rails on a resident's bed. This was true for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #10) reviewed for bed rails. This failure created the potential for harm due to the risk of entrapment and due to lack of opportunity for the resident and/or their representative to make an informed decision regarding the use of bed rails. Findings include: Resident #10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including heart failure, hypertension and muscle weakness. An admission MDS assessment, dated 8/9/21, documented Resident #10 was severely cognitively impaired. A physician's order, dated 10/19/21, documented for Resident #10 to have bilateral 1/4 bed rails on her bed to increase independence with bed mobility. A Safety Device care plan, revised 10/19/21,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-10-22 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, policy review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents' records documented residents were offered, provided education regarding benefits and potential side effects, consented to, and received or refused pneumococcal vaccines. This was true for 2 of 5 residents (#10 and #19) reviewed for immunizations. This failure placed residents at risk of severe illness or death, should they contract pneumococcal (bacterial) pneumonia. Findings include: The CDC website, accessed on 10/22/21, documented the current recommendations for pneumococcal vaccinations (PPSV23 and PCV 13) for all adults 65 years or older as follows: *Administer one dose of PPSV 23 to all adults 65 years or older, and to adults less than 64 years with certain medical conditions and adults less than [AGE] years old who smoke. *Administer one dose of PCV 13 for all adults with certain medical conditions. Healthy adults may receive PCV 13 based on discussions between the patient and health care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to THE ENSIGN GROUP — 342 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 3.2 | -1.2 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.8 | -0.8 vs chain |
| Staffing | 3 of 5 | 2.7 | +0.3 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 2 of 5 | 4.4 | -2.4 vs chain |
The other 341 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.2★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 341; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| BODILY, BRANDON | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 05/01/2025 |
| BRAR, PUSHAPDEEP | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNF | since 05/01/2025 |
| FARNSWORTH, STEPHEN | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER | since 09/20/2024 |
| BURNAM, SOON | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 09/20/2024 |
| HAWKINS, ISAIAH | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 09/20/2024 |
| PORT, BARRY | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 07/26/2018 |
| SATO, AMI | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 09/20/2024 |
| ENSIGN SERVICES INC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 06/01/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 12 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $515K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in ID
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Idaho Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 135053. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-05-01, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.