No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Gateway Transitional Care Center

527 Memorial Drive, Pocatello, ID 83201 · For profit - Corporation · 102 certified beds · (208) 478-3333 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (208) 478-3333 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Resident-funds citation (F0565)Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (34) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
Pharmacy
1515 E Clark St · (208) 478-8800 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
333 N 15th Ave · (208) 232-5739 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased12.3%15.6%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight0.5%5.2%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%1.2%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%2.0%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms28.5%15.1%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury4.6%3.0%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened15.3%16.1%16.1%typical
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication5.2%16.3%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine98.6%96.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.8%3.2%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control22.8%22.1%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table20.3%20.1%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.9%1.8%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine92.9%86.5%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission20.4%17.7%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit7.5%12.3%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.141.171.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.311.661.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

66.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 133 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

66.4%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.1%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
56.6%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
1.04U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.57hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.42hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.06hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 56.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 53 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 1.04 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 97% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 5% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF66.4%CMS range 60.0–73.451.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.1%CMS range 7.3–13.110.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge56.6%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge52.8%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge69.8%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified98.8%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting47.8%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.8%CMS range 4.3–10.67.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.291.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.83
RN hours/ resident / day
0.84
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.09
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.76
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.67
RN hoursweekends
50.0%
Total nursing turnover
26.7%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 102 beds and averages 85.5 residents a day — about 84% occupied, or roughly 16 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.76 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.83 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.09 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.42 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.89 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.89 to 0.67 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 50% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

15
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-07-24)
12
at the previous standard inspection (2024-07-11)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

34 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 24 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews, it was determined the facility failed to assess the risks of transporting residents backwards in Geri-Chairs and had not provided attentive care during resident transports in Geri-Chairs. This was true for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #12) who was observed during transport down the facility's C-Hallway. This deficient practice placed residents at risk for harm when improperly transported and supervision was not provided. Findings include:Resident #12 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including cerebellar ataxia (a group of neurological disorders that affect the cerebellum, the part of the brain responsible for coordination and balance), cognitive communication deficit, and muscle spasms.On 7/22/25 at 3:37 PM, observed Resident #12 in a Geri-Chair being pulled out of her room backwards. Resident #12 was crying out loudly, kicking her legs, and trying to move about in the chair as the CNA pulled her backwards down the hallway. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-24 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, observation, record review, and interviews, it was determined the facility failed to a) provide respiratory services as ordered by the physician and b) ensure physician orders and resident care plans identified interventions for oxygen therapy. This was true for 5 of 13 residents (#3, #5, #9, #28, and #59) whose records were reviewed for respiratory services. This failure created the potential for residents to experience increased fatigue and low oxygen levels. Findings include: The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services website, accessed 7/28/25, stated Section 1833(e) of the Social Security Act precludes payment to any provider of services unless “there has been furnished such information as may be necessary in order to determine the amounts due such provider.” It is expected that the beneficiary’s medical records will reflect the need for the care provided. The beneficiary’s medical records include the physician’s office records, hospital records, nursing home records, home health…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-24 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were assessed to determine if they were safe to self-administer medications for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #83) reviewed for self-administration of medications. This failure created the potential for adverse effects if residents self-administered medications inappropriately. Findings include: Resident #83 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including atrial fibrillation (irregular heartbeat that may cause the heart to beat faster) and diabetes.On 7/23/25 at 11:54 AM, observed a bottle of artificial tears on Resident #83's bedside table.Review of Resident #83's medical record contained a Self-Administration of Medications - Initial Evaluation dated 9/15/23, documented for eye drops- Can correctly administer eye drops or eye ointments according to proper procedure Not Applicable. On 7/23/25 at 12:00 PM, LPN #5 stated the artificial tears in Resident #83's room should not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-24 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, policy review, record review, and resident and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure resident's call light device in their room was within reach for 2 of 19 Residents (#42 and #84) whose rooms was observed. This deficient practice had the potential to cause harm if residents experienced falls, accidents, or had other needs and could not reach the call light device. Findings include:The facility Call Light/Bell policy dated 8/30/21, documented before leaving the room, staff will place the call light device within the resident’s reach. a. Resident #42 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including paraplegia (paralysis of the legs and lower body, typically caused by spinal injury or disease) and hypertension. On 7/21/25 at 2:56 PM, Resident #42 while sitting in her wheelchair stated the call light device had been placed up high on the trapeze bar by staff when they made her bed and now it was out of her…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-24 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure the MDS assessment accurately reflect resident's status. This was true for 1 of 19 residents (Resident #47 ) whose MDS assessments were reviewed. This deficient practice had the potential for negative outcomes if the resident was not assessed and/or monitored due to inaccurate assessments. Findings include: Resident #47 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including spina bifida (a birth defect in which an area of the spinal column does not form properly, leaving a section of the spinal cord and spinal nerves exposed through an opening in the back), anxiety, major depression, and PTSD.Resident #47's admission MDS assessment dated [DATE], documented: Section A: -1500 Is the resident currently considered by the state level II PASRR process to have serious mental illness and/or intellectual disability or a related condition? Yes.-1510 Level II PASRR conditions: Serious Mental Illness = No.Section…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-24 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, policy review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to include a resident's mental and psychosocial needs in their Baseline Care Plan. This was true for for 1 of 19 residents reviewed for baseline care plans (Resident #47). Findings include:The facility's Comprehensive Person-Centered Care Planning policy revision date April 2025, documented it was the policy of the facility that the interdisciplinary team (IDT) shall develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment. The IDT team will also develop and implement a baseline care plan for each resident, within 48 hours of admission, that includes minimum healthcare information necessary to properly care for each resident and instructions needed to provide effective and person-centered care that meets professional standards of quality…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-24 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, policy review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure resident care plans were revised to reflect current needs and interventions. This was true for 5 of 19 residents (#3, #28, #47, #59, #82) whose care plans were reviewed. This placed resident at risk of adverse outcomes if care and services were not provided due to care plans not being revised as residents' needs changed. Findings include: The facility's Comprehensive Person-Centered Care Planning policy, revision date 4/2025, documented the comprehensive care plan would be reviewed and/or revised by the interdisciplinary team after each assessment, including both the comprehensive and quarterly review assessments. a.Resident #3 was admit to the facility on 4/21/25, with multiple diagnoses including surgical aftercare following surgery on the digestive system and schizoaffective disorder. Resident #3's comprehensive care plan documented the following: - Food preferences: Gravy on meat, enjoys…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-24 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility standing orders, record review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to follow a) facility bowel care standing order of delivering specific medications to residents who have not had a BM due to constipation for 1 of 1 resident (#28) whose record was reviewed for bowel care and b) obtain a physician's order for insertion of an IV and dressing changes. This failed practice created the potential for residents to experience discomfort when medications were not administered according to the physician's standing order and potential harm if a resident had an IV inserted without consulting the physician. Findings include: The facility standing order (undated) documented Dulcolax suppository PRN for constipation, Fleet Enema PRN for constipation, and Milk of Magnesia 30 mg Q4 hours PRN for constipation. a. Resident #28 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including chronic kidney disease and gait and mobility issues.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-24 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure nursing staff removed meal trays from resident rooms in a timely manner for which they had the knowledge, skills, and competencies. This was true for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #28) whose breakfast meal tray was observed in her room prior to lunch. This had the potential to create dissatisfaction with meals and decrease residents' quality of life. Findings include:Resident #28 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including chronic kidney disease and gait and mobility issues.On 7/21/25 at 7:58 AM, observed Resident #28's uneaten breakfast meal tray on her overbed table.On 7/21/25 at 11:06 AM, observed Resident #28's uneaten breakfast meal tray still on her overbed table over 3 hours since it had been delivered. Resident #28 stated she does not know why the nursing staff sometimes wait to pick up the breakfast tray when they deliver the lunch meal tray.On 7/22/25…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-24 · tag F0728 — failed to protect against nurse-aide misconduct — isolated
    Ensure that nurse aides who have worked more than 4 months, are trained and competent; and nurse aides who have worked less than 4 months are enrolled in appropriate training.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the State Operations Manual, Appendix PP, staffing schedules, personnel files, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure full-time employees working as a nurse aide successfully completed a State approved training and competency evaluation program within 4 months of being hired. This was true for 4 of 10 nurse aides whose personnel files were reviewed. This failure had the potential to result in negative outcomes for all residents living in the facility. Findings include:On 7/23/25, personnel files for 10 Nurse Aides (NAs) were reviewed. Four of the 10 NAs had not completed a State approved training and competency evaluation program within 4 months of being hired. - NA #2 was hired on 12/11/24. Had not completed a course- NA #3 was hired on 1/10/25. Had not completed a course- NA #4 was hired on 11/12/24. Had not passed test. Must take course again.- NA #5 was hired on 11/7/24. Had not completed a course. On 7/23/25 at 2:00 PM, the Executive Director stated NA #2, NA #3, NA #4, and NA #5 were not certified nursing assistance and the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 24 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-24 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered in accordance with physician orders without errors for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #68) observed to receive medication during the survey. This had the potential to affect the resident's health if she did not receive the medications that were ordered. This resulted in a facility medication error rate of 6.9%. Resident #68 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including fractured left humerus (long bone in the upper arm) and diabetes.Resident #68's physician order dated 6/13/25, documented Cranberry Oral Tablet. Give 500 mg by mouth one time a day for supplement.Resident #68's physician order dated 6/13/25, documented Multivitamin Oral Tablet. Give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day for supplement.On 7/23/25 at 9:25 AM, observed LPN #6 administer Cranberry oral 450mg tablet and Multi-vit with minerals to Resident #68.On 7/23/25 at 9:36 AM, LPN #6 stated the Cranberry tablet was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-24 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, policy review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure stored medications had not passed their expiration date and ensure medication carts were kept locked when not attended by authorized staff in an area where residents could access it. These failed practices affected a) 1 of 3 medication storage rooms creating the potential for residents to receive expired medications with decreased efficacy and b) 1 of 4 medication carts which had the potential for residents to gain access and ingest medications that can cause significant adverse outcomes. Findings include:The facility’s Pharmacy Services Drug Storage policy dated 10/24, documented medication and treatment carts will be kept locked when unattended. On 7/21/25 at 11:00 AM, observed the Hall-B medication cart had been left unlocked and unattended. On 7/21/25 at 11:08 AM, LPN #1 stated the Hall-B medication cart had been left unlocked when unattended and should not have been. On 7/23/25 at 10:55 AM, the DON stated medication carts should not be left unlocked when unattended and had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-24 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, policy review, and review of the Idaho Food Code, the facility failed to ensure food items were dated, labeled, and stored at a safe temperature. These deficient practices had the potential to impact all residents who received meals prepared in the facility's kitchen. This placed residents at risk for potential contamination and use of spoiled foods, and adverse health outcomes including food-borne illnesses. Findings include:The FDA Food Code Section 3-501.17 stated, Ready-to-Eat, Time/Temperature Control for Safety Food, Date Marking, states refrigerated, ready-to-eat, time/temperature control for safety food prepared and held in a food establishment for more than 24 hours shall be clearly marked to indicate the date or day by which the food shall be consumed on the premises, sold, or discarded. Review of the facility's Foods Brought by Family or Visitor policy revision date January 2019, documented food items should be labeled with date it was prepared, if known, and a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-24 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — isolated
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and U.S. Food and Drug Administration 2022 Food Code review, the facility failed to ensure garbage cans were properly closed with lids to minimize attracting pests and rodents into the kitchen. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents and staff in the facility. Findings include:U.S. Food and Drug Administration 2022 Food Code, 5-501.113 Covering Receptacles. Receptacles and waste handling units for REFUSE, recyclables, and returnables shall be kept covered: (A) Inside the FOOD ESTABLISHMENT if the receptacles and units: (1) Contain FOOD residue and are not in continuous use; or (2) After they are filled.On 7/21/25 at 8:18 AM, observed in the kitchen, next to the freezers a garbage can with a hole in the lid.On 7/21/25 at 8:21 AM, the DS #1 stated she was unaware the garbage can should have had a solid lid on it.On 7/23/25 at 3:05 PM, the ED stated the garbage can should have had a solid lid and did not.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-24 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, policy review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure infection control and prevention practices were maintained to provide a safe and sanitary environment when staff did not store oxygen supplies in a sanitary manner. This was true for 4 of 9 Residents (#5, #47, #72, and #84). These failures had the potential to impact all residents in the facility by placing them at risk for cross contamination and infection. Findings include: 1. Resident #5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including fracture right humerus (long bone in the upper arm) and COPD (a group of lung diseases that block airflow and make it difficult to breathe). On 7/21/25 at 9:07 AM, observed Resident #5's nasal cannula draped on bedside table without a cover. 2. Resident #47 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including spina bifida (a birth defect in which an area of the spinal column does not form properly, leaving a section of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-07-11 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure the kitchen was maintained in a sanitary manner when sanitizer solutions were had inadequate strength, rust was observed on the inside of the ice machine, and the dishwashing area contained caulking that was peeling off with food particles entrapped creating a surface that was uncleanable on the stainless counter. These deficiencies had the potential to affect all 76 residents residing in the facility who consumed food prepared by the facility. This placed residents at risk for potential contamination of food and adverse health outcomes, including food-borne illnesses. Findings include: 1. The initial kitchen inspection was conducted on7/8/24 from 9:45 AM through 10:28 AM with the DS. The following was observed: a. The stainless-steel counter where the dish machine sprayer hose was located was observed with a brown and black rubbery substance (caulking) partially adhered to two pipes coming up through the stainless counter and was also partially adhered to the stainless counter…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-07-11 · tag F0732 — pattern
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, policy review, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the required nursing staff posting accurately reflected the actual staff hours to care for the 76 current residents and failed to ensure the posting included an updated census for each shift. This failure had the potential to inaccurately inform any resident, family member, or visitor to the facility of the available nursing staff caring for residents. Findings include: On 7/9/24 at 3:05 PM, a posted nurse staffing was not observed in the R and D/C hall Nurse's Stations. There were white boards located at or near the nurse's stations with staff assignments for the halls. On 7/9/24 at 3:15 PM, the DNS showed the nursing staff posting for 7/8/24 and 7/9/35 on the wall across from the A/B Nurse's Station. The postings included the date, the number of CNAs, RNs, and LPNs, and the anticipated hours to be worked. The nursing staff posting did not include the actual number of hours worked for each nursing staff category or the updated census to account for any admissions, discharges, or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-11 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, policy review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure a bed hold notice was provided to residents or their representatives upon transfer to the hospital. This was true for 2 of 2 residents (#10 and #24) reviewed for transfers. This deficient practice created the potential for harm if residents were not informed of their right to return to their former bed/room at the facility within a specified time. Findings include: The facility's Bed Hold policy, dated 12/2023, states It is the policy of this facility to inform the resident or resident's representative in writing of the right to exercise the bed hold provision of 7 days upon admission and provide a second notice before transfer to a general acute care hospital or before the resident goes on therapeutic leave. In the event of an emergency transfer, the second notice will be provided within 24 hours. A copy of this notification shall become a part of the resident's health record at the time of transfer. 1.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-11 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and resident and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents' Minimum Data Set (MDS) had correct assessment information. This was true for 1 of 19 residents (Resident #39) reviewed for accuracy of MDS assessments. This deficiency created the potential for residents to not have their care needs met due to inaccurate assessments. Findings include: Resident #39 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including diabetes, and hemiplegia and hemiparesis (weakness and paralysis on one side of the body) following a stroke. a. During an interview with Resident #39 on 7/8/24 at 11:15 AM, in response to the question if he had any issues with his teeth, gums, or dentures, Resident #39 stated he did not have teeth and wanted dentures. A Nutrition - admission Evaluation, dated 2/20/20, documented Resident #39 was edentulous (lacking teeth) of both the upper and lower jaws. Annal MDS assessments dated 7/20/23, and 4/20/24, and a significant change of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-11 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure professional standards of practice were followed for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #33) reviewed for quality of care. This created the potential for Resident #33 to have decreased caloric intake and weight loss when physician's orders were not followed to provide a specific dietary supplement. Findings include: Resident #33 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including dementia, adult failure to thrive, and dysphagia (impaired swallowing) after a stroke. A quarterly MDS assessment, dated 6/13/24, documented Resident #33 was 61 inches tall (5 feet, 1 inch) tall and weighed 85 pounds. The assessment documented Resident #33 experienced a significant unplanned weight loss. The assessment further documented Resident #33 was severely cognitively impaired. A Weight Summary, dated 9/30/22 - 7/9/24, documented on 7/2/24 Resident #33 weighed 83.6 pounds and had a body mass index (BMI) of 16.4…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, record review, facility fall reports, observation, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were adequately supervised and had interventions in place to prevent falls. This was true for 2 of 6 residents (#22 and #67) reviewed for falls. The failure to implement adequate supervision and interventions created the potential for Resident #22 and Resident #67 to sustain significant injuries from falls. Findings include: The facility's Fall Prevention/Investigation and Falling Star policy, dated January 2024, documented, it was the facility's policy to prevent falls and investigate the circumstances surrounding each resident fall and implement actions to reduce the incidence of additional falls and minimize potential for injury. The policy documented if the resident sustained a fall, an Incident Report was completed by the nurse which included: - A brief description of the fall by staff and by the resident. - Identification of medications, environmental conditions, equipment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-11 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, policy review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure a resident received oxygen therapy per physician's orders. This was true for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #39) reviewed for oxygen therapy. This failure created the potential for Resident #14 to experience hyperoxia (cells, tissues, and organs are exposed to an excess supply of oxygen. Findings include: The facility's policy, Oxygen Administration, revised 1/2024, stated it was the policy of the facility that oxygen therapy is administered as ordered by the physician or as an emergency measure until the order can be obtained. The policy documented the procedure as follows: - Oxygen per MD/NP [Medical Doctor/Nurse Practitioner] orders - Reassess oxygen flowmeter for correct liter flow. Instructions for Tubing and Humidifier Changes: - Oxygen tubing is to be replaced every seven (7) days. Oxygen masks or nasal prongs are to be replaced every seven (7) days. - Humidifiers are not required if flow of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-11 · tag F0700 — isolated
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, record review, observation, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure that prior to the placement of bed rails, alternatives to bed rails were attempted and individual residents were thoroughly assessed for the risk of entrapment. This was true for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #31) reviewed for bed rails. This failure created the potential for harm due to the risk for injury, entrapment and/or death due to lack of opportunity for the resident and/or their representative to make an informed decision regarding the use of bed rails. Findings include: The facility's policy, Bed Rails, revised 1/2022, stated it was the policy of the facility to attempt to use appropriate alternatives prior to installing a side or bed rail. If a bed or side rail was used, the facility must ensure correct installation, use, and maintenance of bed rails. The policy documented after the facility attempted alternatives to bed rails and determined the alternatives failed to meet the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-11 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the medical necessity of psychotropic medication administration. This was true for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #7) reviewed for psychotropic medication administration. This failure created the potential for Resident #7 to experience negative side effects related to receiving more psychotropic medication than necessary. Findings include: The facility's Psychotropic Medications Policy, revised 12/2023 stated, Residents who use psychotropic drugs receive gradual dose reductions (GDR), and behavioral interventions, unless clinically contradicted, in an effort to discontinue these drugs. Resident #7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including paraplegia (the inability to voluntarily move the lower parts of the body), anxiety disorder, insomnia, and depression. A quarterly MDS assessment, documented Resident #7 was cognitively intact. The assessment documented Resident #7 was receiving antipsychotic,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-11 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, policy review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure medications available for residents were labeled and had not expired. This was true for 2 of 5 insulin pends in a medication cart. This failure created the potential for insulin pens to be used for different residents presenting a risk for cross-contamination or to receive expired medications with decreased efficacy for blood glucose levels. Findings include: The facility's policy titled Labeling of Medications and Biologicals, revised 5/2020 stated t was the policy of the facility that medications and biologicals were labeled in accordance with facility requirements, state, and federal laws. The policy stated, Only the provider and pharmacy modifies or changes prescription labels. The policy stated the procedure was as follows: Each prescription medication label includes at the minimum: - Resident's name. - Medication name -Prescribed dose and strength of medication - Expiration date - Route of administration - Specific Directions or Instructions for use, as applicable - For…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure infection control prevention practices were maintained to provide a safe and sanitary environment. This was true for 3 of 19 residents (#10, #163, and #182) observed for infection control. These failures put residents at risk for cross contamination and infection. Findings include: 1. Resident #10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple with diagnoses including Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD - a condition caused by damage to the airways or other parts of the lung that blocks airflow and makes it hard to breathe). A quarterly MDS assessment, dated 4/29/24, documented Resident #10 was moderately cognitively impaired. The assessment further documented he was receiving continuous oxygen therapy. A physician order, dated 4/10/24, documented Resident #10 was to receive Ipratropium-Albuterol Inhalation Solution 0.5-2.5 mg per 3ml via nebulizer every six hours for shortness of breath and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-11 · tag F0909 — failed to maintain a comfortable temperature — isolated
    Regularly inspect all bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails (if any) for safety; and all bed rails and mattresses must attach safely to the bed frame.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, policy review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure beds and bed rails were inspected and maintained as part of an ongoing program. This was true for 2 of 6 residents (#10 and #22) reviewed for bed rails. This failure created the potential for injury or harm if a resident was to become entrapped by unmonitored equipment. Findings include: The facility's Bed Rails policy, revised 1/2022, stated it is the policy of the facility to attempt to use appropriate alternatives prior to installing a side or bed rail. If a bed or side rail is used, the facility must ensure correct installation, use, and maintenance of bed rails. Entrapment is an event in which a resident is caught, trapped, or entangled in the space in or about the bed rail. The policy stated when installing and using bed rails, the facility shall install bed rails using the manufacturer's instructions to ensure a proper fit and safe spacing. It further stated regardless of mattress…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2019-04-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, policy review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to a) date items in the freezer and refrigerator, b) ensure staff contained all hair with a hair net, c) ensure infection control practices were implemented when gathering ice to be used to keep foods cool and d) clean and maintain the kitchen floor. These deficient practices placed 18 of 18 sample residents (#1, #2, #11, #22, #23, #26, #27, #36, #42, #43, #44, #62, #65, #67, #71, #76, #228, and #229) who dined in the facility, and the other 61 residents who dined in the facility, at risk food borne illness or other disease-causing pathogens. Findings include: The facility's food labeling and dating policy, dated 2017, directed staff to date food upon receipt before being stored. The policy also documented food moved from the freezer to the refrigerator for thawing was to be labeled with the removal date and a use by date. The facility's Staff Attire policy, dated 9/2017, directed staff members to have their hair off the shoulders and confined in a hair net or cap. On 4/8/19 from 4:00 to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2019-04-12 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on Resident Council meeting minutes, Resident Group interview, policy review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to address Resident Council concerns. This was true for 8 of 8 residents (#3, #8, #17, #26, #36, #45, #60, and #64) who participated in the Resident Group interview. The deficient practice had the potential to cause psychosocial harm for residents frustrated by the perception their concerns were not valued or addressed by the facility. Findings include: The facility's Grievance policy, revised on 1/2018, documented the facility would make prompt efforts to resolve grievances, including Resident Council concerns, and to keep residents notified of progress toward resolution. Resident Council minutes, dated 2/28/19, documented complaints of cold meals and coffee, and long wait times for response to call lights. Resident Council minutes, dated 3/28/19, documented the residents wanted follow through with the issues they talked about in the meetings and still wanted hot coffee. The facility did not document what actions were taken to resolve the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2019-04-12 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, policy review, review of Resident Council minutes, resident interview, Resident Group interview, test tray evaluation, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure palatable food was served. This was true for 15 of 18 residents (#1, #3, #8, #17, #20, #26, #27, #36, #38, #41, #45, #53, #54, #60, and #64) reviewed for food and nutrition. This failed practice had the potential to negatively affect residents' nutritional status and psychosocial well-being. Findings include: The facility's Food Quality and Palatability policy, revised 9/2017, documented food will be palatable and served at an appetizing temperature. Resident Council minutes, dated 2/28/19, documented complaints of cold meals and coffee. Resident Council minutes, dated 3/28/19, documented the residents wanted follow through with the issues they talked about in the meetings and still wanted hot coffee. The facility did not document what actions were taken to resolve the concerns identified at the 2/28/19 meeting. On 4/10/19 at 10:10 AM, during the Resident Group interview,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-04-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, policy review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to implement appropriate infection control practices when assisting residents during dining and after a Hoyer lift transfer of a resident on contact precautions. This was true for 2 of 6 residents (#33 and #42) observed in the assisted dining room and 1 of 4 residents (Resident #16) in contact precaution rooms. These deficient practices created the potential for harm by exposing residents to the risk of infection and cross contamination. Findings include: The facility's Infection Control policy, dated 9/29/17, directed staff to disinfect equipment after each use for residents in contact precaution rooms. 1. Resident #16 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #16's record included a physician's order, dated 3/28/19, which documented she was to be on contact precautions due to a Vancomycin-resistant Enterococci (specific types of antimicrobial-resistant bacteria that are resistant to Vancomycin,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-04-12 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, policy review, resident, resident representative, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to document, investigate, and report complaints expressed by 1 of 19 residents (Resident #227) whose complaints were reviewed. This failure created the potential for harm if residents' verbal grievances were not acted upon and residents did not receive appropriate care or were at risk for abuse or neglect. Findings include: The facility's Grievance Policy, dated 1/2018, documented residents had the right to file a grievance orally or in writing and the right to obtain a review in writing; and when a grievance was voiced to a staff member a grievance form would be completed and the grievance would be evaluated and investigated. The facility's Grievance file did not include a grievance for Resident #227. On 4/10/19 at 9:56 AM, Resident #227 and his representative stated they reported incidents to the facility staff, as well as other concerns that were medical in nature, as follows: - A nurse answered the call light and said she could not help Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-04-12 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, policy review, resident interview, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents' care plans were revised as needed. This was true for 1 of 21 residents (Resident #67) whose care plans were reviewed. This failure had the potential for harm if cares and/or services were not provided due to inaccurate information. Findings include: The facility's Care Planning policy, undated, directed staff to develop a comprehensive care plan for each resident and care plans were to be updated quarterly and as needed. Resident #67 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including depression, anxiety, generalized muscle weakness, and reduced mobility. a. Resident #67's quarterly MDS assessment, dated 3/21/19, documented she required the assistance of two staff with toilet use and transfers, and the assistance of one person with eating. Resident #67's care plan documented she required one-person assist with toilet use and transfers. The care plan…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-04-12 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, record review, and staff and resident interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were offered the pneumococcal vaccine and information and education consistent with current Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommendations. This was true for 1 of 7 residents (Resident #23) reviewed for pneumococcal immunizations. This failure created the potential for harm to residents should they acquire, transmit, or experience complications from pneumococcal pneumonia. Findings include: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) website, updated 11/22/16, documented recommendations for Pneumococcal vaccination (PCV 13 or Prevnar13®, and PPSV 23 or Pneumovax23®) for all adults 65 years or older: * Adults 65 years or older who have not previously received PCV 13, should receive a dose of PCV 13 first, followed 1 year later by a dose of PPSV 23. *If the patient already received one or more doses of PPSV 23, the dose of PCV 13 should be given at least 1 year…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to THE ENSIGN GROUP — 342 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 3 of 53.2-0.2 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.8-0.8 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 52.7+0.3 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.4+0.6 vs chain
The other 341 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.2★, per CMS)
1 of 5Aspen Health And WellnessOverland Park, KS 1 of 5Bennett Hills Rehabilitation and Care CenterGooding, ID 1 of 5Broadway By The SeaLong Beach, CA 1 of 5Chatsworth Park Health Care CenterChatsworth, CA 1 of 5Clarion Wellness and Rehabilitation CenterClarion, IA 1 of 5Colonial Manor of RandolphRandolph, NE 1 of 5Durango Health And RehabilitationDurango, CO 1 of 5Fort Dodge Health and RehabilitationFort Dodge, IA 1 of 5Greater Southside Health and RehabilitationDes Moines, IA 1 of 5Hearthstone Health And RehabilitationSparks, NV 1 of 5Heritage Gardens Rehabilitation and HealthcareCarrollton, TX 1 of 5Hillcrest Health Care CenterHawarden, IA 1 of 5Lake Village Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterLewisville, TX 1 of 5Lakeside Rehabilitation and Care CenterCoeur d'Alene, ID 1 of 5Legend Oaks Healthcare And Rehabilitation - NorthAustin, TX 1 of 5Legend Oaks Healthcare And Rehabilitation - WaxahaWaxahachie, TX 1 of 5Legend Oaks Healthcare and Rehabilitation - Fort WKeller, TX 1 of 5Madera Post Acute CenterEl Monte, CA 1 of 5Medallion Post Acute RehabilitationColorado Springs, CO 1 of 5Mesquite Post Acute CareLubbock, TX 1 of 5Millbrook Healthcare and Rehabilitation CenterLancaster, TX 1 of 5Misty Willow Healthcare and Rehabilitation CenterHouston, TX 1 of 5New Orange HillsOrange, CA 1 of 5Northeast Rehabilitation and Healthcare CenterSan Antonio, TX 1 of 5Northgate PlazaIrving, TX 1 of 5Oak View Health And RehabilitationConway, SC 1 of 5Oakwood Care And RehabilitationLakewood, CO 1 of 5Omaha Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterOmaha, NE 1 of 5Onion Creek Nursing and Rehabilitation CenterAustin, TX 1 of 5Park Manor Bee CaveBee Cave, TX 1 of 5Pelican Pointe Health And Rehabilitation CenterWindsor, CO 1 of 5Premier Care Center For Palm SpringsPalm Springs, CA 1 of 5Provo Rehabilitation and NursingProvo, UT 1 of 5Rock Canyon Respiratory And Rehabilitation CenterPueblo, CO 1 of 5Rosewood Rehabilitation CenterReno, NV 1 of 5San Marcos Rehabilitation and Healthcare CenterSan Marcos, TX 1 of 5Sonterra Health CenterSan Antonio, TX 1 of 5SouthlandNorwalk, CA 1 of 5Southland Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterLufkin, TX 1 of 5Spencer Post Acute Rehabilitation CenterSpencer, IA

Showing 40 of 341; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
MONTEATH, GAVINIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/08/2025
ROGERS, TREYIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/29/2023
FARNSWORTH, STEPHENIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 07/27/2018
BURNAM, SOONIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 10/01/2006
HAWKINS, ISAIAHIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 10/01/2006
KEETCH, CHADIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 03/01/2011
SATO, AMIIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 09/09/2024
J GORRICETA PLLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 10/01/2006
PORT, BARRYIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/09/2025
CARETRUST GP LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2006
CARETRUST REIT INCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2006
CTR PARTNERSHIP LPOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 05/01/2013
ENSIGN SERVICES INCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2006
MEMORIAL HEALTH HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2006

CMS files one row per role, so the 18 rows in the source record cover these 14 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$14.5M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+18.8%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.3M
Related-party expense11% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 71%Medicare 14%Other / private 15%

About 71% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.3M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 11% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$396per resident / day
operating cost
$12,024per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$487per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in ID

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Idaho Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Idaho
$10,494/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,175/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 135011. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-07-24, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next