Majestic Care Of Avon
445 S County Road 525 E, Avon, IN 46123 · For profit - Corporation · 117 certified beds · (317) 745-2522 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Feb 2024
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
- a high number of inspection citations overall (32) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
- about 19% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 3.3% | 11.0% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 10.0% | 5.5% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.6% | 1.1% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 63.4% | 25.2% | 6.5% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 7.6% | 3.9% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 6.0% | 11.9% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 38.4% | 23.5% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 95.1% | 95.4% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 2.8% | 3.6% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 22.6% | 23.3% | 21.2% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 12.4% | 13.6% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.2% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 65.2% | 79.0% | 79.4% | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.13 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 10% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 17% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 9.3%CMS range 5.6–14.3 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — Newly certified nursing home with less than 12-15 months of data available or the nursing home opened less than 6 months ago, and there were no data to submit or claims for this measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.27 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 117 beds and averages 84.2 residents a day — about 72% occupied, or roughly 33 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.32 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.39 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.24 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.97 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.46 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.43 to 0.29 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 40% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 3 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
32 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 22 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-08-22 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespreadProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure sufficient staffing for the second quarter of 2025, sufficient staffing to prevent falls and to provide routine activities of daily living (ADLs), and sufficient staffing to address ongoing resident grievance concerns. This deficient practice had the potential to affect 80 of 80 residents who resided in the facility. Findings include:1. Based on the review of the Payroll Based Journal (PBJ) staffing data for the second quarter of 2025, the facility was identified by the Centers of Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) as triggering for excessively low weekend staffing. PBJ data showed staffing levels on weekends were significantly lower than weekday averages falling below required thresholds for nursing coverage. Insufficient weekend staffing had the potential to negatively impact residents by delaying assistance with activities of daily living, (such as toileting, bathing, and mobility) increased the risk for falls and skin breakdown due to reduced supervision and limiting timely responses to call…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-08-22 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — widespreadKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure all kitchen equipment was in proper working order. This deficient practice had the potential to affect 80 of 80 residents who ate meals in the facility.Findings include:On 8/17/25 at 1:36 p.m. an initial tour of the kitchen was conducted. The freezer was observed; the walls, fans and ceiling of the freezer had drips of water that had been frozen over, and boxes that had been pushed up against the wall had water damage on the cardboard, ice on top of the boxes and some boxes were frozen together.During an interview on 8/17/25 at 2:20 p.m. the Maintenance Director indicated the company they used had come out to fix the freezer on 8/4/25, but he thought the problem now was a small missing piece of weather stripping that could be causing the freezer to thaw.On 8/19/25 at 2:05 p.m. the Maintenance Director indicated the company they used would be there 8/21/25 to fix the weather stripping.On 8/22/25 at 12:15 p.m. the DON provided a copy of a current facility policy titled, Equipment, dated 9/2017. This policy indicated,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-22 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — patternHonor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to appropriately follow up to grievances made by individual residents and as a group during resident council for 12 of 12 months of resident council minutes reviewed and for 2 of 2 meetings with residents observed. Findings include:On 8/19/25 at 2:00 p.m. the Activities Director provided copies of Resident Council meeting minutes going back to August 2024.A Resident Council Minutes form, dated 8/8/24, indicated under old business there were no snacks on the weekends. One grievance was filed.A Resident Council Minutes form, dated 9/20/24, indicated under old business there were no snacks on the weekends and under new business there were five residents with missing clothes from the laundry, and they still were not getting snacks on the weekends, among other concerns.A Resident Council Minutes form, dated 10/16/24, indicated under old business there were no snacks at the nurses' station and under new business there were two residents with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-22 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents with dementia in the secured memory care unit received necessary assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs) for 11 of 20 residents who resided on the dementia unit (Residents 27, 14, 13, 76, 20, 9, 32, 59, 19, 51, and 64). Findings include:1. On 8/17/25 at 9:50 a.m., Resident 27 was initially observed with unshaven facial stubble, long fingernails, and his hair appeared greasy and unbrushed. Upon multiple observations from 8/17/25 through 8/20/25, Resident 27 remained unshaven, and appeared to have greasy, unbrushed hair and long fingernails. When his ADLs were inquired about, a certified nursing aide (CNA) took him to his room without resistance or refusals. When Resident 27 returned to the main activity room, his face was shaved, his nails were trimmed and his hair was neatly brushed back. Resident 27's shower sheets for the month of august were reviewed with one refusal on 8/16/25 but did not indicated if any…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-22 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to date pharmaceuticals, remove expired eye drops from the medication cart, and stored anti-itch topical cream with eye drops and oral tablets together for 3 of 3 medication carts observed.Findings include: On [DATE] at 11:21 a.m., the 600 hall medication cart was observed. Resident 77 had a vial of fluphenazine (Prolixin, used to treat schizophrenia) without a date to indicate when it was opened.Resident 47 had a bottle of refresh tears eye drops with no date to indicate when it was opened.Resident 75 had an albuterol inhaler without a date to indicate when it was opened.Resident 55 had an albuterol inhaler without a date to indicate when it was opened. RN 37 validated items were not dated and removed items from the medication cart.On [DATE] at 11:35 a.m., the 800 hall medication cart was observed. Anti-itch topical cream was stored beside eye drops and oral medications.On [DATE] at 11:50 a.m., the [DATE] medication cart was observed. Resident 42 had an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-08-22 · tag F0807 — failed to offer suitable drinks — patternEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides drinks consistent with resident needs and preferences and sufficient to maintain resident hydration.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents in the Memory Care unit had sufficient and accessible fluids made available throughout the day for 5 of 5 days observed on the Memory Care unit. This deficient practice had the potential to affect 20 of 20 residents residing on the Memory Care unit (Residents 32, 27, 59, 10, 19, 70, 28, 64, 74, 20, and 39). Findings include:During multiple observations conducted from 8/17/25 through 8/21/25, residents in the Memory Care (MC) unit did not consistently have beverages available at bedside, in their rooms, or in common areas. On 8/18/25 at 1:33 p.m., Resident 32 was observed. She approached the nurses' station, got a plastic cup from a stack on top of the cart, and used the pitcher of water designated for medication administration to pour herself a cup of water. She drank it all at once. She placed the cup and pitched back on the cart. On 8/18/25 at 1:37 p.m., Resident 27 approached the nurses' station and asked for water several times, before the nurse on the cart returned, and poured him a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-22 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident (Resident 89) received timely notification that his Medicare coverage was ending for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for Notice of Medicare Noncoverage (NOMNC). Findings include: On 8/18/25 at 11:25 a.m., Resident 89's NOMNC notice was reviewed.The NOMNC was dated 5/1/24 (sic, meant to be 2025). The form was signed by Resident 89's wife and legal representative the same day that his services ended.During an interview on 8/18/25 at 11:49 a.m., the Social Service Director (SSD) indicated NOMNCs should be issued at least two days before services end, so that residents had the opportunity to appeal if needed. Resident 89's representative requested that he be discharged on 5/2/25.Even at the resident/representative's request to discharge on a certain date, his services were coming to an end on 5/1/25 and should have received notice as late as 4/29/25.On 8/18/25 at 12:07 p.m., the Administrator (ADM) provided a copy of current facility policy titled, Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) revised 6/30/25. The policy…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-22 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to prevent the potential for accidents related to staff leaving personal items with unknown smoking substances in a resident's room who wore oxygen for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for the potential for accidents (Resident 35).Findings include:On 8/17/25 at 10:45 a.m. Resident 35 was observed as she lay in bed resting, there was an oxygen concentrator next to the bed that was running with oxygen tubing connected and draped on the bed next to the resident. The resident indicated she could not find her cellphone; upon observation of her room a cell phone was found plugged into a charging cable on the empty bed next to Resident 35. The Resident indicated the cell phone was not hers, it was Certified Nursing Aide (CNA) 7s. There was also a backpack sitting on a guest chair, the resident indicated she thought it was her daughter's and wanted to look inside to see if it was. When Resident 35 looked inside, she indicated there was a strong odor of marijuana omitting from the bag. The resident took out a notebook, and upon observation the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-06-25 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interview, the facility failed to serve food at an acceptable temperature to residents residing on the 600 hall. This deficiencyhad the potential to affect residents 14 of 14 residents who had their trays delivered to their rooms. Findings include: During an observation on 6/25/25 at 1:14 p.m., CNA 4 was passing lunch hall trays on the 600 hall by herself. She indicated she was by herself passing the 600 hall trays. A request was made to check the temperature of the lunch trays on the 600 hall cart. The temperatures were checked by [NAME] 6. The temperature of the chicken was 122 degrees. The temperature of the mashed potatoes was 122.7 degrees. The temperature of the mixed vegetables was 117.0. A policy was provided by the Executive Director (ED) on 6/25/25 at 1:25 p.m. It indicated, .Time/Temperature Control for Safety (TCS) hot food will be to a minimum temperature for 15 seconds, as follows: Poultry and stuffed foods 165 degrees F All foods will be held at appropriate temperature, greater than 135 degrees F (or as state regulation requires) This…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-25 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — isolatedEnsure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observations, record review, and interview, the facility failed to serve a resident her diet as ordered for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for diets (Resident B). Findings include: On 6/25/25 at 11:03 a.m., a record review was completed for Resident B. She had the following diagnoses which included but were not limited to weakness, hypertension, and weight loss. She had orders for regular diet, ground meat, double portions with a magic cup at lunch. On 6/25/25 at 1:30 p.m., Resident B was observed receiving her lunch tray. She did not have double portions or a magic cup on her tray. CNA 8 confirmed she did not have double portions or a magic cup on her tray and went to retrieve those items. A policy was not provided at the time of exit. This citation relates to Complaint IN00459625. 3.1-21(b)
Show the remaining 22 citations
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-08 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — patternHonor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Resident Council Grievance concerns related to call light wait and response times was addressed in a timely and effective manner to prevent ongoing concerns for 5 of 82 residents who attended the Resident Council Meeting and complained on behalf of all 82 residents who resided in the facility. Findings include: During an interview on 8/7/24 at 8:53 a.m., the Executive Director (ED) indicated, he could not find Resident Council Minutes from October 2023 through (-) February 2024. The ED indicated, since he and the new Activity Director (AD) started, they had been keeping track of and organized the minutes. At that time, the ED provided copies of the minutes from March 2024 - July 2024. Minutes from a meeting held on 3/26/24 at 2:30 p.m. indicated, .overnight staff call lights on for 1-2 hours- staff on phones all the time including during resident care Minutes from a meeting held on 4/29/24 at 1:30 p.m., indicated, .night shift,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the facility's non-smoking policy was followed and allowed unassessed residents who smoked to smoke on the facility grounds and keep smoking materials in their rooms for 6 of 6 residents reviewed for smoking (Resident 6, 22, 26, 67, 77, and 79). Findings include: A list of smokers in the facility was requested from the Executive Director (ED) and Director of Nursing (DON) several times on 8/4 and 8/5/24. The facility provided the list on 8/6/24 at 1:52 p.m. 1. On 8/6/24 at 1:08 p.m., Resident 6 was observed smoking a cigarette. He was in his wheelchair, in the parking lot in front of the facility. On 8/6/24 at 10:14 a.m., Resident 6's record was reviewed. His diagnosis included, but were not limited to, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), hemiplegia and hemiparesis of left non-dominant side (partial paralysis), epilepsy (brain disorder with recurring seizures), diabetes mellitus (DM) (blood sugar disorder), and tobacco use. A smoking care plan, dated 4/23/24, indicated Resident 6 was a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-08 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to label and date medications when opened and remove expired medications from use for 3 of 5 medication carts and 1 of 2 refrigerators observed for medication storage. Findings include: 1.On 8/4/24 at 10:14 a.m., the 600 hall medication cart was observed for medication storage. a. Resident 26 had an albuterol AER 90 mg (milligram) inhaler (used to treat breathing conditions) with no date to indicate when it was opened. b. Resident 26 had trelegy ellipta (used to treat breathing conditions) 100/62.56/25 mcg (microgram) without a date to indicate when it was opened. c. Resident 22 had a bottle of fluticasone nasal spray (used for allergies) 50 mcg without a date to indicate when it was opened. 2.On 8/4/24 the 700 hall medication cart was observed for medication storage. a. Resident 32 had a Humalog insulin pen with a date opened of 5/24/24. It had expired on 6/23/24. b. Resident 2 had a Humalog insulin pen with a date opened of 5/29/24. It had expired on 6/27/24. c. Resident 2 had a glargine insulin pen with a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-08 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident assessments were completed for 1 of 1 resident who self-administers medications (Resident 15). Findings include: On 8/4/24 at 12:01 p.m., Resident 15 was observed to have medications in her room and bathroom. On her over the bed table, she had fluticasone nasal spray (treats chronic rhinosinusitis) and carboxymethylcellulose eye drops (treats dry eyes), and on her bathroom counter she had metronidazole (treats facial rosacea). On 8/6/24 at 10:28 a.m., Resident 15's record was reviewed. Her physician orders included, but were not limited to: fluticasone nasal spray dated 1/3/24, may keep at bedside to self-administer; carboxymethylcellulose eye drops dated 1/3/24, may keep at beside and self-administer; and metronidazole lotion dated 5/17/24, unsupervised self-administration. A document titled, Medication Self-Administration Safety Screen, dated 1/3/24, indicated Resident 15 could keep at bedside and self-administer fluticasone nasal spray. It indicated eye drops and topical creams were not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-08 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview the facility failed to accurately code falls on the MDS (Minimum Data Set) for 1 of 2 Residents reviewed for MDS accuracy (Resident 53). Findings include: On 8/6/24 at 2:18 p.m., Resident 53's medical record was reviewed. She was a long-term care resident who resided on the secured Memory Care (MC) unit with diagnoses which included, but were not limited to, Alzheimer's disease with late onset (Alzheimer's is a type of dementia, dementia is an irreversible degenerative brain disease which affects memory and cognitive function). A nursing progress note, dated 5/14/24 at 5:53 a.m., indicated, Resident 53, .was up in the hall several times in the night, and escorted back to bed. During a.m. bed check she was seen in a male patient's bed, while being escorted back to her room she fell on her right hip that had a brush in the pocket and c/o [complains of] pain at that hip . A hospital History & Physical, dated 5/15/24, indicated, Resident 53 sustained a fall and had suffered an acute, impacted, nondisplaced right subcapital femoral neck fracture.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-08 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — isolatedProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure sufficient licensed nurse coverage was available on the weekends for 1 of 4 quarters of staffing reviewed which had the potential to effect 82 of 82 residents who resided in the facility. Findings include: On 8/6/24 at 9:30 a.m., the facilities CASPER report was reviewed and indicated, staffing concerns had been triggered in the second quarter of 2024 for low weekend staffing. On 8/8/24 at 8:36 a.m., the actual worked licensed nursing schedule was request for the month of May 2024. On 8/8/24 at 10:47 a.m., the above requested schedule was provided by the Executive Director (ED) and reviewed at that time. For the first week of the month, May 1 through (-) 7th, the licensed staff per-patient-per-day (licensed staff PPD- the number of hours a licensed nursing staff member is granted per patient, per day) averaged to 0.74. For the second week of the month, May 8th-14th, the licensed staff PPD averaged 0.62. For the third week of the month, May 15th-21st, the licensed staff PPD averaged 0.61. For the fourth week of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-08 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolatedProvide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure two cognitively impaired residents who wished to have a relationship and resided on the secured memory care unit had assessments for appropriateness, ongoing supervision, and person-centered goals and interventions for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for dementia services (Residents 53 and 55). Findings include: On 8/6/24 at 2:07 p.m., Resident 53 was unable to be located after looking in her room, her private bathroom, the secured memory care (MC) activity/dining room and in the therapy gym. During an interview on 8/6/24 at 2:08 p.m., the MC Facilitator (MCF) indicated, Resident 53 was probably visiting with her friend, Resident 55, and asked two passing Certified Nursing Aides (CNAs) to find Resident 53. CNA 17 and CNA 18 went to Resident 55's room. Resident 55 and Resident 53 were observed lying in bed together with Resident 55's arm wrapped around Resident 53's waist. The CNAs indicated Resident 53 visited Resident 55 all the time…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-13 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — patternProvide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure the secured memory care unit provided person-centered care, supervision, and engaging activities to prevent resident-to-resident altercations and/or accidents. These deficient practices had the potential to affect 30 of 30 residents who resided in the secured memory care unit (Residents L, B, EE, GG, X, M, N, W, FF, and HH). Findings include: During a confidential interview, a visiting family member indicated, there were a lot of residents that wandered on the locked memory care unit. When they came to visit their loved one, they would be interrupted several times by residents who would wander into the room while they visited. It had really bothered their loved one when they first moved in, but they have since gotten used to it. It could be problematic for some other residents and the visitor sometimes heard other residents yelling at their peers to get out. The family member indicated the unit was usually staffed with two aides…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-06 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a non-verbal, cognitively impaired resident was free from abuse for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for abuse (Resident B). Findings include: During the survey, the family provided the video from Resident B's web camera showing the abuse on 2/4/24. In the video Qualified Medication Aide (QMA) 11 was standing on the left side of the bed next to Resident B. The blankets were off of Resident B and QMA 11 was preparing to change the resident's incontinence brief. Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) 12 came to the right side of the bed from the bathroom. CNA 12 was smiling and talking with QMA 11. Resident B was calm and watching QMA 11 and CNA 12. Once CNA 12 was next to Resident B, CNA 12 reached over and grabbed Resident B's left arm and left hip to pull her toward her while QMA 11 pushed the resident's back and left shoulder to turn her onto her right side toward CNA 12. Resident B slid her legs down off the edge of the bed like she was getting out of bed. Resident B moved her hands toward CNA 12's lower arm and elbow…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-06 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff immediately reported to the Administrator witnessed abuse by another staff member to a resident for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for abuse (Resident B). Findings include: During the survey, the family provided the video from Resident B's web camera showing the abuse on 2/4/24. In the video Qualified Medication Aide (QMA) 11 was standing on the left side of the bed next to Resident B. The blankets were off of Resident B and QMA 11 was preparing to change the resident's incontinence brief. Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) 12 came to the right side of the bed from the bathroom. CNA 12 was smiling and talking with QMA 11. Resident B was calm and watching QMA 11 and CNA 12. Once CNA 12 was next to Resident B, CNA 12 reached over and grabbed Resident B's left arm and left hip to pull her toward her while QMA 11 pushed the resident's back and left shoulder to turn her onto her right side toward CNA 12. Resident B slid her legs down off the edge of the bed like she was getting out of bed. Resident B moved her hands toward CNA…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-06-30 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the kitchen foods were dated, all refrigeration units had working thermometers, the kitchen was clean, and staff facial hair was covered for 3 of 3 kitchen observations, and the facility failed to ensure staff used appropriate hand hygiene with making, delivering, and assisting to fed residents for 4 of 4 random observations (Residents 4, 59, 71, and 95). Findings include: 1. On 6/25/23 at 9:46 a.m., a trash can was observed uncovered. On 6/25/23 at 9:48 a.m., Dietary Aide (DA) 34 was observed wearing a surgical mask in the kitchen, the sides of his beard were exposed. On 6/25/23 at 9:49 a.m., the Kitchen Manager in Training (KMIT) provided a tour of the kitchen. She indicated the Kitchen Account Manager (KAM) 24 was her supervisor and was training her. On 6/25/23 at 9:53 a.m., DA 26 was observed in the kitchen with no hair net and no beard cover, only a surgical mask. During the initial kitchen tour, on 6/25/23 from 9:54 a.m. to 10:10 a.m., the following was observed. a. The double refrigerator had 10…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-06-30 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — patternHonor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Resident Council received responses and follow-up for their requests and grievances related for 6 of 6 months of resident council notes reviewed. This deficient practice had the potential to effect 92 of 92 residents who resided in the facility. Findings include: On 6/29/23 at 12:25 p.m., the Resident Council (RC) Meeting Minutes were reviewed. On 1/10/23 the RC met and requested the creation of a Dietary Council group. There was no response. Additionally, the RC indicated Housekeeping/Laundry department needs work. Although a grievance form was submitted late, on 1/19/23, it was not responded to until 2/16/23. On 2/14/23 the RC met and discussed new concerns related to the Nursing Department which included, staff use of cell phones, language barriers, and call light response times. There was no response. The RC discussed concerns related to the Dietary department which included, a request to have more consistent mealtimes, resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-06-30 · tag F0574 — patternThe resident has the right to receive notices in a format and a language he or she understands.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure information for the Indiana Long-Term Care Ombudsman Program was easily available and accessible for Residents and/or their representatives to review for 5 of 6 days of the survey. This deficient practice had the potential 92 of 92 residents who resided in the facility. Findings include: Upon the survey entrance on 6/25/23 and on 6/26/23, 6/27/23, 6/28/23, and 6/29/23 information related to the Ombudsman program was not visibly posted in the facility. During an interview on 6/28/23 10:18 a.m., the Activity Assistant indicated she had worked since September and had never heard of the Ombudsman program and was unfamiliar with the term. She did not know if information about the program was available for Residents to review and would not know where it would be posted. On 6/29/23 at 2:30 p.m., a Resident Council meeting was conducted with 5 residents who regularly attended the monthly meetings and included the attendance of the Resident Council President. When asked if they knew who their Ombudsman was,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-06-30 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
A. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure randomly tested memory care (MC) resident rooms had water temperatures able to reach 100 degrees Fahrenheit (F) for 11 of 11 resident rooms tested for water temperature (Resident 8, 51, 52, 59, 67, 71, 75, 76, 77, 85 and 95). B. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident rooms in the 800 hall and in MC were clean and a home-like environment for 22 of 22 residents' rooms observed on the 800 hallway and MC unit (Resident 4, 8, 9, 16, 21, 26, 43, 45, 46, 47, 52, 54, 57, 67, 76, 77, 81, 85, 95, 100, 113, and 252). Findings include: A. On 6/25/23 at 1:52 p.m., Certified Nursing Aide (CNA) 27 indicated the facility had issues with water not getting hot enough on the memory care (MC) unit on the 100 hallway and 300 hallways. The residents' showers were only lukewarm, and the MC residents complained of being cold during showers. On 6/25/23 at 1:55 p.m., the Administrator (Admin) brought a digital thermometer and provided the warmest water temperatures in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-06-30 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — patternProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide oxygen therapy and respiratory care according to physician orders and residents' plans of care for 4 of 4 residents reviewed for oxygen therapy (Residents 6, 48, 251, and 252). Findings include: 1. On 6/26/23 at 11:39 a.m., observed Resident 6, lying in bed. The oxygen was not being administered and the tubing and trach mask were draped over the easy air machine (EasyAir compressor is a high performance portable medical air compressor designed to supply compressed air 24 hours a day), and oxygen concentrator at the bedside. On 6/27/23 at 2:03 p.m., the resident was sitting on the bed. His hair was oily with white and yellow flakes in his hair. The resident was more receptive and communicated with a white board. He had a trach speaking device but chose not to use it. The Larrytube (a flexible silicone tube designed to maintain the stoma right after the laryngectomy surgery) was in a cup filled with water next to the bed. A tracheostomy (trach) inner cannula tube (an inner tube inserted within the main…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-06-30 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — patternProvide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the kitchen had enough staff to provide meals in a timely manner for 92 of 92 resident who received food from the kitchen. Findings include: 1a. On 6/25/23 at 11:46 a.m., 15 memory care (MC) resident were observed in chairs in the dining room. Awaiting lunch that was due to begin at 12:00 p.m. They had no drinks. On 6/25/23 at 12:49 p.m., 25 MC resident were observed in the dining area waiting for lunch. They had no drinks. Staff were trying to keep them engaged by redirecting them to stay in the dining room. The first tray out to the MC dining room was at 12:57 p.m. The KMIT indicated the trays were late coming out because there were only to dietary staff working in the kitchen. She indicated there were only 2 of us and we are doing the best we can do. 1b. On 6/25/23 at 12:10 p.m., no food had been provided in the main dining room. The Administrator came in and started proving drinks. On 6/25/23 at 1:00 p.m., the residents in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-06-30 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — patternMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the memory care (MC) did not have crawling insects in resident rooms and the kitchen for 2 or 2 observations (Resident 57). Findings include: 1. On 6/28/23 at 1:21 p.m., Resident 109, a MC resident, was observed in her bed. Her floor was sticky and three small, separate, gravel ant hills were observed on her outside wall. Her bed was about 3 feet away from the outside wall. The ants were observed crawling on the floor and through two of the ant hills. On 6/28/23 at 1:24 p.m., Qualified Medication Aide (QMA) 6 indicated she saw the ants and ant nests on the floor of Resident 57's room in the past and had reported it. She would let Environmental Services know about it and her expectation was for the housekeeping staff to keep the floors clean. On 6/28/23 at 1:28 p.m., Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 29 indicated she had reported the issues with the ant nests in Resident 57's room. The ants brought in that small gravel from outside. On 6/28/23 at 1:32 p.m., Resident 77 indicated sometimes she would see…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-30 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a resident with timely toileting assistance resulting in discomfort for the resident for 1 of 1 random observation (Resident 78). Findings include: During an observation, on 6/27/23 at 2:10 pm, Resident 78 was sitting in his doorway with his call light was on. At 2:14 p.m., an unidentified staff member walked by the resident and asked what he needed. He indicated he needed to use the bed pan and it was almost too late. He indicated he had been waiting 90 minutes. The 2 staff members then went into another room on the hall. At 2:16 p.m., CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) 7 asked him what he needed, and he told her same information as above. She went into his room and turned off the call light, exited the room, and proceeded down the hall. The resident remained in the doorway. At 2:20 p.m., CNA 7 exited the other resident's room and walked by Resident 78 without assisting him. Resident 78 turned on his call light again. At 2:22 p.m., CNA 7 exited a resident's room, proceeded to the food cart, and moved…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY A. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who had a history of falls with fractures, had fall interventions in place to prevent the potential for additional falls for 1 of 8 residents reviewed for accidents (Resident 7). B. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a memory care (MC) resident's room was free of medications for 2 of 2 random observations (Resident 16) and failed to ensure a resident with medications in her room was accessed for safety to self-administrate medications (Resident 252) for 1 of 8 residents reviewed for accidents. Findings include: A. On 6/28/23 at 9:25 a.m., Resident 7 was observed. She was seated in a regular high back wheelchair (WC) and was assisted by Certified Nursing Aide (CNA) 19 back into her room to lay down. CNA 19 conducted a stand and pivot transfer without placing a gait belt around the resident, neutralizing/stabilizing the low air loss mattress (LAL) or locking the WC's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-06-30 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident received care for constipation for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for bowel continence (Resident 14). Finding includes: On 6/25/23 at 11:18 a.m., Resident 14 indicated on 6/20/23 she was severely constipated. She had been trying to have a bowel movement for two hours and she could not go. She asked the nurse for an enema and was told the staff did not give enemas. The staff only gave laxatives. The resident then called 911 and asked them to take her to the hospital for an enema. The resident went to the hospital by ambulance and was given an enema at the hospital. After she returned to the facility, the staff asked the resident why she had called 911. The resident replied she called because she needed someone who would help her. The resident indicated prior to going to the hospital she was bloated and in severe pain. On 6/28/23 at 1:52 p.m., Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 10 indicated after three days of no bowel movement (BM), she would do a bowel assessment, then administer Miralax if the resident did not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2023-06-30 · tag F0641 — patternEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to accurately code the use of oxygen on the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for oxygen therapy (Resident 48). Findings include: On 6/26/23 at 10:50 a.m., Resident 48 was observed with 2.5 liters (L) of oxygen It was being administered per a nasal canula (NC), continually through an oxygen concentrator machine. The oxygen tubing and nasal cannula (NC) tubing were attached to the portable oxygen tank sitting on the floor next to the resident's bed. The tubing and NC tubing were laying on the floor un-bagged. On 6/29/23 at 9:36 a.m., Resident 48 was up walking in his room. Oxygen was being administered at 2.5 L via NC per the oxygen concentrator. On 6/28/23 at 2:58 p.m., Resident 48's record was reviewed. His diagnoses included, but was not limited to, late onset Alzheimer's disease (a brain disorder that slowly destroys memory and thinking skills and, eventually, the ability to carry out the simplest…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2023-06-30 · tag F0732 — patternPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to update the daily staff posting for 1 of 6 days of observation. This deficiency had the potential to effect all residents in the building. Findings include: On 6/25/23 at 9:35 a.m., the daily staffing sheet (information regarding licensed and unlicensed staff responsible for resident care) was observed. It was dated for Friday, 6/22/23. Receptionist 30 provided a copy on 6/25/23 at 9:45 a.m. An updated staffing sheet for Sunday, 6/25/23, was not posted or available. On 6/29/23 at 1:56 p.m., the Director of Nursing Services (DNS) indicated her expectation was for the daily staffing schedule to be posted by the facility scheduler from Monday through Friday. It was not updated on the weekends, unless the facility scheduler worked on the weekend. A current policy titled, Nurse Staffing Posting Information, with no date, was provided by the Regional Nurse Consultant (RNC), on 6/29/23 at 3:21 p.m. A review of the policy indicated, .It is the policy of this facility to make nurse staffing information readily…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to MAJESTIC CARE — 22 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 2.5 | -0.5 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.1 | -0.1 vs chain |
| Staffing | 1 of 5 | 1.7 | -0.7 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 4.5 | +0.5 vs chain |
The other 21 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.5★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PULASKI MEMORIAL HOSPITAL | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 12/31/2020 |
| MARX, JOSIAH | Individual | CONTRACTED MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 08/27/2021 |
| MALOTT, GREGG | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 01/01/2021 |
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 75% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $2.4M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 19% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in IN
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Indiana Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 155338. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-08-22, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.