No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Saint Anthony

203 Franciscan Dr, Crown Point, IN 46307 · For profit - Corporation · 189 certified beds · (219) 661-5100 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (219) 661-5100 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citations — no harm found (F0607, F0609) — most recent Aug 2023Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (50) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • about 18% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
297 W Franciscan Dr #101 · (219) 662-0999 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
Walgreens<0.1 mi
200 W Franciscan Dr · (219) 663-0336 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
200 W Franciscan Dr · (219) 663-0304 · Call to confirm hours
Park
1306 S Main St · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 2 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased9.8%11.0%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight5.9%5.5%5.4%typical
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.4%0.4%0.9%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.7%1.1%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms40.3%25.2%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury4.5%3.9%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened13.0%11.9%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication12.7%23.5%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%95.4%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.4%3.6%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control21.2%23.3%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table14.5%13.6%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.8%1.2%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine80.8%79.0%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission19.6%22.2%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit12.9%10.8%12.0%typical
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.761.611.67typical
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.551.441.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

49.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 248 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

49.7%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
13.4%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
48.4%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.48U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.28hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.17hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.03hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 48.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 122 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.48 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 79% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 10% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF49.7%CMS range 41.5–57.751.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF13.4%CMS range 10.7–17.710.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024worse than U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge48.4%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge36.1%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge25.4%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified98.2%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay1.8%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened6.5%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.2%CMS range 3.8–8.77.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.361.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.51
RN hours/ resident / day
0.75
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.33
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.60
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.38
RN hoursweekends
46.8%
Total nursing turnover
47.4%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 189 beds and averages 176.5 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 12 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.60 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.51 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.33 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.04 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.83 on weekdays — 21% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.57 to 0.38 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 47% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

7
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-06-16)
16
at the previous standard inspection (2024-05-20)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

50 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 40 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-08 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure professional standards of quality were maintained related to a nurse administering the incorrect medications to a resident, taking medications from a resident's pill card and attempting to administer to a different resident, and working under the influence of drugs for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for medication administration. (LPN 1 and Resident B)The deficient practice was corrected on 1/26/26, prior to the start of the survey, and was therefore past noncompliance. The facility identified the concern on 1/17/26. At that time, the nurse was suspended pending investigation and then her employment was terminated. On 1/26/26, all staff were provided with in-service education related to medication administration. The in-service included ensuring all nurses had access to Capsa (medication dispenser)/emergency drug kit (edk), education related to the five rights of medication administration, process for contacting pharmacy, cut off times for delivery, Capsa usage, ordering/reordering medications, and not borrowing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-08 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were kept in a locked medication cart at all times during a medication pass observation. (RN 1, 3A Cart)Findings include:1. On 4/8/26 at 9:32 a.m., RN 1 was observed preparing medications for a resident. She retrieved the medications from the cart, popped the pills into a medication cup, prepared a dose of Miralax in water, and then walked into the resident's room to administer the medications. The cart was left unlocked and out of sight of the nurse at the time. The nurse returned to the cart and prepared the next resident's medications. 2. On 4/8/26 at 9:41 a.m., RN 1 was observed preparing another resident's medications. She had retrieved the medications from the cart, popped the pills into a medication cup, and went into the resident's room to administer the medications. The cart was left unlocked and out of sight of the nurse at the time. The nurse returned to the cart to prepare more medications.During an interview on 4/8/26 at 9:51 a.m., RN 1 indicated she was supposed to lock the cart any time she…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-23 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice related to blood sugar levels not obtained and insulin doses not administered as ordered by the physician for 2 of 9 residents reviewed for quality of care. (Residents C and J)Findings include:1. Resident C's record was reviewed on 12/22/25 at 10:20 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, diabetes mellitus.A Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 10/20/25, indicated no cognitive impairments and the resident had received insulin for the past seven days. A Care Plan, dated 3/12/25 and revised on 12/19/25, indicated a diagnosis of diabetes. An intervention, dated 3/12/25, indicated medication would be administered as ordered by the physician.A Physician's Order, dated 5/21/25, indicated Lispro (insulin), seven units was to be administered with meals daily. The insulin was to be held (not administered) if the blood sugar was less than 100. The Lispro and blood sugar checks were scheduled for 8:00 a.m.,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-16 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents had physician's orders for self-administration of medications and an assessment to self-administer their own medications for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for self-administration of medication. (Resident 144) Finding includes: During an observation of Resident 144 on 6/10/25 at 11:13 a.m., there were three small medication cups on the bedside table and night stand containing multiple Tums (an antacid medication). There were also two large Tums medication bottles and an inhaler at the bedside. The resident indicated at the time that she would take the Tums medication whenever she ate and as she needed them for heartburn. On 6/11/25 at 10:24 a.m., Resident 144 was observed in bed. The Tums medication and inhaler were observed at the bedside. On 6/12/25 at 9:57 a.m., Resident 144 was observed in bed. The Tums medication and inhaler were observed at the bedside. Resident 144's record was reviewed on 6/11/25 at 10:33 a.m.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-16 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment was accurately completed related to antianxiety and antiplatelet medications for 2 of 32 MDS assessments reviewed. (Residents 107 and 375) Findings include: 1. Resident 107's record was reviewed on 6/12/25 at 10:22 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, schizoaffective disorder, general anxiety disorder, and dementia with behavioral disturbance. The Quarterly MDS assessments, dated 5/23/25, 5/7/25, and 2/13/25, indicated the resident had not received any antianxiety medications. A Care Plan, updated 5/28/24, indicated the resident had schizoaffective disorder and was currently receiving antipsychotic, antidepressant, anticonvulsant, and antianxiety medications. A Physician's Order, dated 12/2/22, indicated Klonopin (clonazepam, an antianxiety medication) 0.5 mg (milligrams) two times a day. The Medication Administration Record (MAR), dated 5/2025, indicated the resident had received the antianxiety medication twice daily. During an interview on 6/12/25 at 1:42 p.m.,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-16 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure activities of daily living (ADLs) were completed for dependent residents related to twice weekly showering and nail care for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for ADLs. (Residents 52 and 105) Findings include: 1. During an interview on 6/10/25 at 10:00 a.m., Resident 52 indicated she did not always receive showers twice a week. Resident 52's record was reviewed on 6/11/25 at 10:37 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, heart failure, chronic kidney disease, and stage 3 pressure ulcer of the sacral region. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 4/30/25, indicated the resident was cognitively intact for daily decision making. The resident had an impairment affecting range of motion to one side of the lower extremities. She was dependent on staff for toileting, showering, bed mobility, and transfers. A Care Plan, revised on 5/1/25, indicated the resident needed assistance with activities of daily living. Interventions included, but were not limited to, the resident required total assistance…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-16 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents received the necessary treatment and services related to the monitoring and assessment of skin discolorations for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for non-pressure related skin conditions. (Resident 100) Finding includes: On 6/9/25 at 11:36 a.m., Resident 100 was sitting in a wheelchair in the hallway. A dark purple discoloration was observed to the top of his right hand. On 6/11/25 at 9:32 a.m., Resident 100 was observed lying in bed with his eyes closed. The dark purple discoloration was still observed to the top of his right hand. Record review for Resident 100 was completed on 6/12/25 at 1:18 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, anemia, atrial fibrillation, heart failure, hypertension, and dementia. The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 6/4/25, indicated the resident was cognitively impaired. The resident required a substantial maximal assistance with bed mobility, transfers, and upper body dressing. The resident had received an anticoagulant (blood thinning)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents with a history of falls with injuries had preventions in place to prevent more falls/injuries related to a resident's call light not in reach and a Dycem (non slip mat) and non-skid strips were not in place as ordered for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for falls. (Residents 95 and 117) Findings include: 1. On 6/11/25 at 9:35 a.m., Resident 95 was observed sitting in a wheelchair next to her bed in her room watching television. The resident had darkened discolorations to the top and right side of her head and right hand. The resident also had a visible lump to the top of her head. The resident indicated she had fallen recently out of her wheelchair when she was trying to reach for something out of her nightstand. The resident's call light was not visibly in reach to the resident. The resident indicated she was unsure where her call light was located. On 6/11/25 at 11:28 a.m., Resident 95 was observed sitting in her room in the same position. The resident's call light was still not in reach to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-16 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident received the necessary care and treatment related to oxygen not administered as ordered for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for respiratory care. (Resident 51) Finding includes: On 6/10/25 at 9:21 a.m., Resident 51 was observed lying in her bed. She had a nasal cannula in place and oxygen was flowing at 5 liters per minute (lpm). On 6/11/25 at 9:59 a.m., the resident was again observed in bed with oxygen flowing at 5 lpm. The resident's record was reviewed on 6/11/25 at 8:45 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dementia, asthma and chronic obstructive respiratory disease. The admission Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 5/16/25, indicated the resident had severe cognitive impairment, and was dependent for bed mobility, transfers and toileting assistance. The current Physician's Orders indicated the resident was to receive oxygen at 3 lpm continuously. During an interview on 6/11/25 at 10:00 a.m., LPN 4 indicated the resident's oxygen should be set at 3 lpm. She entered the room and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-16 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a medication cart drawer was closed and locked while unattended for 1 of 5 medication carts observed. (1A Medication Cart) Finding includes: On 6/12/25 at 9:00 a.m., QMA 1 was observed preparing Resident 18's medications. She finished preparing the medications, locked the medication cart, and entered Resident 18's room at 9:12 a.m. The bottom drawer on the right side of the medication cart was not pushed in all the way and medications were visible. QMA 1 administered the medications to Resident 18 and returned to the medication cart at 9:18 a.m. During an interview on 6/12/25 at 9:18 a.m., QMA 1 indicated she was not aware the drawer had not been closed all the way. During an interview on 6/12/25 at 1:16 p.m., the Director of Nursing was made aware the medication cart drawer had been left open. The medication storage policy was requested. A current facility policy, titled Medication and Biological Storage Requirements, indicated, .2. The facility is required to secure all medications in a locked storage…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 40 citations
  • Potential for harm · E2025-01-16 · tag F0557 — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents on the Memory Care Unit were treated with respect and dignity, related to a staff member yelling and using foul language in the hallway where residents could hear the staff member. This had the potential to affect all the residents on the Memory Care Unit. (Terminated Employee 1 and Resident G). The deficient practice was corrected on 12/16/24, prior to the start of the survey, and was therefore past noncompliance. Finding includes: A facility initiated staff to resident incident reported to the Indiana Department of Health (IDOH), dated 12/6/24, was reviewed on 1/15/25 at 1:03 p.m. The incident indicated an altercation between Terminated Employee 1 and Resident G. Review of the facility's finished investigation of the incident, dated 12/11/24, indicated staff to resident abuse had not occurred. Terminated Employee 1 was immediately placed on administrative leave and was instructed to leave the building. She admitted to using some profanity in front of the residents. A typed statement from the ED, dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure care-planned interventions to prevent injuries due to a fall were in place, related to a non-slip pad not on the wheelchair pad when the resident was sitting in the wheelchair and a mat not placed on the floor next to the bed when the resident was lying in bed, for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for falls and fall interventions. (Resident D) Finding includes: Resident D was observed on 1/14/25 at 9 a.m., 10:05 a.m. and 11:31 a.m., sitting by herself in the wheelchair in her room. During an observation on 1/14/25 at 11:35 a.m., QMA 3 and CNA 4 assisted the resident from the wheelchair to the bed. The resident was assisted to stand from the wheelchair. A non-slip pad was not under the resident in the wheelchair. During an interview at the time of the observation, QMA 3 and CNA 4 indicated they were unsure if a non-slip pad was to be on the wheelchair pad and both indicated it was not on the wheelchair. The resident was assisted in a lying position on the bed and incontinence care was completed. She was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure fall interventions were in place for a resident with a history of falls for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for accidents. (Resident D) Finding includes: On 10/8/24 at 2:05 p.m., Resident D's room was observed. There were no non-skid strips on her bathroom floor. The record for Resident D was reviewed on 10/8/24 at 11:15 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, Alzheimer's disease, hypertensive chronic kidney disease, type 2 diabetes mellitus, osteoarthritis, dementia, and repeated falls The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 8/29/24, indicated the resident was severely cognitively impaired and required substantial assistance with activities of daily living. A Care Plan, updated 10/23/23, indicated the resident was at risk for falls. An intervention, dated 9/23/24, indicated non-skid strips were to be placed on the bathroom floor, near the toilet. An Indiana Department of Health reportable incident, dated 9/9/24, indicated new bruising was found under the resident's eye and on both…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-09 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure food consumption logs were completed for residents with a history of weight loss for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for nutrition. (Residents F and C) Findings include: 1. Record review for Resident F was completed on 10/8/24 at 2:34 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, atrial fibrillation, heart failure, hypertension, [NAME] syndrome (body makes too much cortisol hormone), diabetes mellitus, and end stage renal disease. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 8/20/24, indicated the resident was cognitively intact. The resident required partial assistance with eating. A Care Plan, dated 8/14/24, indicated the resident was at risk for complications and symptoms of hypoglycemia or hyperglycemia due to diabetes. An intervention included to document the resident's meal and snack intake. An IDT Risk Review, dated 10/3/24, indicated the resident's most recent weight on 10/3/24 was 203 pounds. The previous weight on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-09 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure each resident's medication regimen was managed and monitored to promote or maintain the resident's highest practicable mental, physical, and psychosocial well-being, related to not monitoring the resident's pulse as ordered prior to administering a blood pressure medication for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. (Resident F) Finding includes: Record review for Resident F was completed on 10/8/24 at 2:34 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, atrial fibrillation, heart failure, hypertension, [NAME] syndrome (body makes too much cortisol hormone), diabetes mellitus, and end stage renal disease. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 8/20/24, indicated the resident was cognitively intact. The October 2024 Physician's Order Summary indicated an order for metoprolol succinate (treats high blood pressure) 100 mg (milligrams) one time a day. Hold the medication for heart rate less than 60. The September…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-20 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure dependent residents received the activities of daily living (ADL) care needed related to showers not given as scheduled, facial hair unshaven, and soiled sheets on a resident's bed for 5 of 8 residents reviewed for ADL care. (Residents 76, 121, 52, C, and 45) Findings include: 1. On 5/13/24 at 2:53 p.m., Resident 76 was observed lying in his bed. His hair appeared greasy and there was visible white debris observed. His beard had visible food debris. On 5/14/24 at 9:11 a.m., the resident was observed lying in bed. His hair was greasy with white debris observed. The resident's record was reviewed on 5/15/24 at 12:50 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, hemiplegia (one sided paralysis) and hemiparesis (one sided weakness) following a cerebral vascular accident, diabetes mellitus and vascular dementia. The Annual Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 2/8/24, indicated the resident had moderate cognitive impairment and required extensive assistance for bed mobility and toileting. The current ADL…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-20 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were properly stored for 4 of 5 medication carts observed. (1A Medication Cart, 2C Medication Cart, 2B Medication Cart, and 3D Medication Cart) Findings include: 1. On 5/20/24 at 9:13 a.m., the 1A Medication Cart was observed with RN 2. There were approximately 20 pills of different sizes and colors that were loose and out of the packages throughout the bottoms of the drawers in the cart. The nurse indicated nursing was responsible for making sure the medication carts were cleaned. 2. On 5/20/24 at 9:26 a.m., the 2C Medication Cart was observed with LPN 2. There were approximately 40 pills of different sizes and colors that were loose and out of the packages throughout the bottoms of the drawers in the cart. The nurse indicated nursing was responsible for making sure the medication carts were cleaned. 3. On 5/20/24 at 9:33 a.m., the 2B Medication Cart was observed with RN 3. There were approximately 12 pills of different sizes and colors that were loose and out of the packages throughout the bottoms of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-20 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents had physician's orders for self-administration of medications for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for self-administration of medication. (Resident 111) Finding includes: On 5/14/24 at 9:21 a.m., Resident 111 was observed in her room in bed. There was a medication cup noted with multiple pills in it on the table next to her. The resident indicated the nurses always had left her morning medications for her to take after she had eaten her breakfast. Resident 111's record was reviewed on 5/15/24 at 1:22 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dementia, heart disease, and anxiety disorder. A Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 4/5/24, indicated the resident was cognitively intact for daily decision making. She had taken antidepressants, anticoagulants, diuretics, and opioid medications in the last 7 day look back period. An Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) note, dated 5/14/2024 at 9:18 a.m., indicated the IDT met to review the resident and determined the resident was able to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-20 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to notify the family/representative of a significant weight loss, a weight loss, and a new order for a nutritional supplement for 2 of 7 residents reviewed for nutrition. (Residents 59 and 143) Findings include: 1. Resident 59's record was reviewed on 5/14/24 at 2:42 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, Lewy body dementia, psychotic disorder, depressive disorder and diabetes mellitus. The resident resided on the locked dementia unit. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 3/29/24, indicated the resident had severe cognitive impairment and required limited staff assistance for bed mobility and transfers, and could eat independently after set up. The Current Physician Orders indicated the resident was on a regular diet. There were no nutritional supplements or fortified food ordered. The resident's weights were as follows: 2/5/24: 232 pounds (lbs) 2/11/24: 230 lbs 2/18/24: 218 lbs 2/25/24: 217 lbs 3/6/24: 217 lbs This was a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-20 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure a clean and homelike environment related to stained and dirty bed linens for 1 of 35 residents reviewed for a homelike environment. (Resident B) Finding includes: On 5/14/24 at 10:03 a.m., Resident B was observed lying in bed with his eyes closed. There was a dark reddish-brown stain on the bottom sheet next to where his left forearm was resting. His pillowcase also had a large brown stain along the end of it. On 5/15/24 at 10:42 a.m., Resident B was observed lying in bed with his eyes closed. The stains remained to the bottom sheet and the pillowcase. On 5/15/24 at 10:58 a.m., a CNA exited the room after providing care to Resident B. Resident B was now sitting up in his wheelchair in his room. His bed had been made, however, the stains remained to the bottom sheet and the pillowcase. During an interview with the Administrator on 5/15/24 at 11:11 a.m., she indicated the linens were probably already stained when they were put on the bed. She then changed the linens. This citation relates to Complaint IN00431905.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-20 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents received the necessary treatment and services related to the monitoring and assessment of skin discolorations for 3 of 7 residents reviewed for non-pressure related skin conditions. (Residents B, 66, and 10) Findings include: 1. On 5/14/24 at 10:03 a.m., Resident B was observed lying in bed with his eyes closed. He had 2 scabbed areas to his right forearm and multiple purple discolorations to his left forearm. On 5/15/24 at 10:42 a.m., Resident B was observed lying in bed with his eyes closed. The scabbed areas and discolorations remained to his arms. Record review for Resident B was completed on 5/15/24 at 3:50 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, type 2 diabetes mellitus, dementia with behavioral disturbance, and chronic kidney disease. The Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 3/5/24, indicated the resident was cognitively impaired and required substantial/maximal assist with upper body dressing. A current Care Plan, updated 3/11/24, indicated the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-20 · tag F0685 — isolated
    Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident received the assistive device needed to maintain vision related to broken glasses not addressed in a timely manner, for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for vision/hearing. (Resident 76) Finding includes: On 5/13/24 at 2:53 p.m., 5/14/24 at 9:11 a.m., and 5/15/24 at 1:20 p.m., Resident 76 was observed lying in his bed. There was a pair of glasses with one of the arms broken off sitting on the overbed table. The resident indicated he used them for reading. The resident's record was reviewed on 5/15/24 at 12:50 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, hemiplegia (one sided paralysis) and hemiparesis (one sided weakness) following a cerebral vascular accident, diabetes mellitus, and vascular dementia. The Annual Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 2/8/24, indicated the resident had moderate cognitive impairment and required extensive assistance for bed mobility and toileting. There was no documentation in the record related to the broken glasses or optometry appointments. During an interview…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-20 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure each resident received the necessary treatment and services to promote healing for pressure ulcers, related to ensuring a wound treatment and offloading boots were in place for 2 of 8 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. (Residents D and E) Findings include: 1. The closed record for Resident D was reviewed on 5/16/24 at 2:52 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, anemia, dementia with mood disturbance, and atrial fibrillation. The resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged on 4/1/24. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 2/13/24, indicated the resident was cognitively impaired, had no unhealed pressure ulcers, and was at risk for pressure ulcers. A Care Plan, dated 3/19/24, indicated the resident had a pressure ulcer to the left hip. An intervention included, wound treatments as ordered. The Skilled Care Nursing Documentation form, dated 3/18/24, indicated there were no current…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-20 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident's positioning was maintained related to hand splints not applied as ordered, for 3 of 4 residents reviewed for positioning/mobility. (Residents 76, 10 and 125) Findings include: 1. On 5/13/24 at 2:53 p.m., Resident 76 was observed lying in his bed. His left hand was contracted and there was no splint in place. On 5/15/24 at 1:20 p.m., the resident was observed lying in bed. His left hand was contracted and there was no splint in place. The resident indicated he used to wear a splint, but was told he didn't need to wear it anymore. He was unable to open his left hand. The resident's record was reviewed on 5/15/24 at 12:50 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, hemiplegia (one sided paralysis) and hemiparesis (one sided weakness) following a cerebral vascular accident, diabetes mellitus and vascular dementia. The Annual Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 2/8/24, indicated the resident had moderate cognitive impairment and required extensive assistance for bed mobility and toileting.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure fall interventions were in place for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for accidents. (Residents B and 91) Findings include: 1. On 5/14/24 at 10:03 a.m., Resident B was observed lying in bed with his eyes closed. There were no floor mats in place at the bedside. Both mats were leaning up against the wall by the window. On 5/15/24 at 10:42 a.m., Resident B was observed lying in bed with his eyes closed. There were no floor mats in place at the bedside. Both mats were leaning up against the wall by the window. Record review for Resident B was completed on 5/15/24 at 3:50 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, type 2 diabetes mellitus, dementia with behavioral disturbance, and chronic kidney disease. The Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 3/5/24, indicated the resident was cognitively impaired and required substantial/maximal assist with bed mobility and transfers. A current Care Plan, updated 3/11/24, indicated the resident was at risk for falls An intervention included, mat…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-20 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure urinary output was recorded as per the plan of care for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for urinary catheters. (Resident 89) Finding includes: On 5/13/24 at 1:57 p.m., Resident 89 was observed lying in bed. The resident had a urinary catheter attached to the side of his bed. The bag was observed with a small amount of urine in the bag. The resident indicated staff did not empty his catheter bag and he would have to tell them multiple times a day to make sure they emptied it. Record review for Resident 89 was completed on 5/16/24 at 1:37 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, obstructive uropathy, diabetes mellitus, and end stage renal disease. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 4/1/24, indicated the resident was cognitively intact. The resident was dependent for toileting and required substantial assistance with bed mobility. The resident had an indwelling urinary catheter. A Care Plan, dated 5/8/23 and revised 6/28/23, indicated the resident was at risk for infection or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-20 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure interventions were implemented for a resident with a significant weight loss, failed to ensure food consumption logs were completed and weekly weights were completed as ordered for 3 of 7 residents reviewed for nutrition. (Residents 59, 91 and 158) Findings include: 1. Resident 59's record was reviewed on 5/14/24 at 2:42 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, Lewy body dementia, psychotic disorder, depressive disorder, and diabetes mellitus. The resident resided on the locked dementia unit and was admitted on [DATE]. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 3/29/24, indicated the resident had severe cognitive impairment and required limited staff assistance for bed mobility and transfers, and could eat independently after set up. The current May 2024 Physician Order Summary indicated the resident was on a regular diet. There were no nutritional supplements or fortified food ordered. The resident's weights were as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-20 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident with a gastronomy tube (g-tube) received appropriate treatment related to not completing water flushes before medication administration as ordered by the physician, for 1 of 7 residents reviewed during medication administration. (Resident 115 and RN 1) Finding includes: On 5/16/24 at 11:11 a.m., RN 1 was observed preparing Resident 115's medication to administer via a g-tube. The nurse crushed Tylenol 325 mg (milligrams) x 2 tablets and poured them into a medicine cup. She then proceeded to add 30 ml (milliliters) of water to the cup with the Tylenol. RN 1 checked placement of the g-tube, attached a syringe to the g-tube and poured the medicine cup into the syringe. After the diluted medication went through the tubing, she then proceeded to administer 30 ml of water into the tubing. Record review for Resident 115 was completed on 5/16/24 at 11:08 a.m. The May 2024 Physician's Order Summary indicated an order to administer 30 ml of water before and 30 ml of water after medication…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-20 · tag F0699 — isolated
    Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure to deliver care and services and to address the needs of a resident with a diagnosis of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) related to not following care plan interventions or updating care plans for a PTSD diagnosis for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for behaviors. (Resident 134) Finding includes: On 5/13/24 at 9:54 a.m., Resident 134 was noted to be yelling out. On 5/16/24 at 10:10 a.m., Resident 134 was observed in a broda chair in a common area with other residents. He was observed making noises under his breath. On 5/17/24 at 10:23 a.m., Resident 134 was observed in his room in a broda chair loudly yelling out. Resident 134's record was reviewed on 5/15/24 at 1:57 p.m. Diagnosis included, but were not limited to, dementia, PTSD, psychosis, major depressive disorder, and generalized anxiety disorder. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 3/3/24, indicated the resident was severely cognitively impaired for daily decision making. He displayed inattention, disorganized thinking, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-20 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure clinical records were complete and accurately documented related to medication administration, for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for antibiotic use. (Resident 74) Finding includes: During an interview with Resident 74 on 5/14/24 at 9:32 a.m., she indicated she had a urinary infection and was being treated with antibiotics. The record for Resident 74 was reviewed on 5/16/24 at 11:22 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, anemia, congestive heart failure, and hypertension. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 5/10/24, indicated the resident was cognitively intact and had septicemia and a urinary tract infection in the last 30 days. A Physician's Order, dated 5/6/24, indicated to give piperacillin-tazobactam (Zosyn, an antibiotic) 3.375 grams intravenously every 8 hours for 7 days for sepsis due to pseudomonas (bacteria). The Medication Administration Record (MAR), dated 5/2024, indicated the antibiotic medication had not been signed off as given on the following dates and times: 6 a.m. on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure infection control guidelines were in place and implemented related to a lancet disposed of improperly for a random observation during a blood sugar check. (Resident 37 and RN 1) Finding includes: On 5/16/24 at 11:25 a.m., RN 1 was observed testing Resident 37's blood sugar level. The nurse washed her hands, donned gloves, cleaned the resident's finger, and then poked the resident's finger with a lancet to obtain the blood sample. The resident's blood sugar level was then assessed. The nurse then took off her gloves and disposed of them into the resident's garbage can along with the lancet. The nurse then proceeded to walk out of the resident's room into the hallway. During an interview after the observation, RN 1 indicated she disposed of the lancet into the resident's garbage can. She should have disposed of the lancet into the sharps container. A facility policy titled, Sharps Disposal and received as current from the Administrator indicated, .2. Contaminated sharps will be discarded into containers…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-18 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents who required extensive and dependent care for activities of daily living (ADL's), received showers and/or bathing per their preferences and timely incontinent care for 5 of 6 residents reviewed for ADL assistance. (Residents F, J, N, B, and L) Findings include: 1) Resident F was interviewed on 12/13/23 at 10:18 a.m She indicated she has had one shower since being admitted into the facility and has bed baths the rest of the time when they bathed her. She has not received a bed bath twice a week. She also does not get incontinent care timely and has had to sit in urine and bowel movement for long periods of time because they turn her call light off and say they will be back but never come back. During the interview, the resident was observed wearing a purple gown/top. During an observation on 12/13/23 at 11:07 a.m., the call light was activated and answered by Employee 1. Employee 1 and Employee 2 entered the room to provide incontinent care. The incontinent brief was saturated with urine and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-18 · tag F0573 — isolated
    Let each resident or the resident's legal representative access or purchase copies of all the resident's records.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide residents' medical records to the family/Power of Attorney (POA) in a timely manner after a request was made for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for medical record requests. (Residents B and K) Findings include: 1. Resident B's closed record was reviewed on 12/13/23 at 3:40 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, Parkinson's disease. The resident was discharged from the facility on 9/11/23. During an interview on 12/14/23, the Medical Records Clerk indicated the family requested the medical records on 10/9/23 and it was faxed to the Corporate Office on 10/10/23. She indicated the request for records has to be filled out and signed and brought to the facility. It is then faxed to the Corporate Office and the records are sent out from there. During an interview with Corporate Medical Records Employee 3 on 12/14/23 at 9:08 a.m., she indicated the resident's records were not sent to the family until 10/26/23. 2. Resident K's closed record was reviewed on 12/15/23 at 9:39 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure Care Plan interventions to prevent falls were in place, related to non-skid strips on the floor and dycem (non-slide material) on the wheelchair to prevent sliding for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for falls. (Resident M) Finding includes: During an observation on 12/15/23 at 10:02 a.m. with Employee 4, there were no non-skid strips on the resident's bathroom floor and no dycem on the wheelchair seat. Resident M's record was reviewed on 12/15/23 at 9:46 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, vascular dementia. An Annual Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 12/2/23, indicated a severely impaired cognitive status, maximum assistance required for transfers, moderate assistance required for ambulation, and no falls. A Care Plan, dated 5/13/21, indicated a risk for falls. The interventions included, on 7/31/23 dycem was applied to the seat of the wheelchair and on 12/11/23, non-skid strips were applied to the bathroom floor. A Nurse's Progress Note, dated 7/29/23 at 11:05 a.m., indicated the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-11 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to implement their written policies and procedures that protected residents after an allegation of abuse, related to a CNA continued to work the rest of the shift after an allegation of abuse was reported by a resident for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for abuse. (Resident B and CNA 2) Finding includes: During an interview on 8/11/23 at 4:37 a.m., Nurse 1 indicated an altercation had occurred between staff members and Resident B on 8/8/23. Resident B accused CNA 2 of throwing water on her. The Director of Nursing (DON) was notified and CNA 2 was removed from the resident's care. CNA 2 had not been sent home and worked the rest of her shift. Cross reference F609 The facility abuse policy, dated 3/2021 and received from the Director of Nursing as current, indicated employees who have been accused of resident abuse shall be suspended of duty immediately until the results of the investigation have been reviewed by the Administrator. This Federal tag relates to Complaint IN00414807. 3.1-28(a)

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-11 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure an allegation of abuse was reported to the Indiana Department of Health (IDOH) and other proper authorities for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for abuse. (Resident B) Finding includes: During an interview on 8/11/23 at 4:37 a.m., Nurse 1 indicated an altercation had occurred between staff members and Resident B on 8/8/23. Resident B had several outbursts of yelling at staff. CNA 2 was in the room and she was in the hallway. She heard something that sounded like an object sliding across the floor like it had been thrown. When she entered the resident's room, Resident B accused CNA 2 of throwing water on her and there was a bath basin on the floor. CNA 2 indicated the resident had thrown water on her. The Director of Nursing (DON) was notified and CNA 2 was removed from the resident's care. The resident was mad and would not let anyone complete care on her. During an observation on 8/11/23 at 4:55 a.m., Resident B was awake, sitting up in bed, the TV was on, and she was doing something on her cell phone. She…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-11 · tag F0743 — isolated
    Ensure that a resident does not develop patterns of decreased social interaction and/or increased withdrawn, angry, or depressive behaviors, unless unavoidable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to accurately document behaviors, triggers for the behaviors, interventions, and the outcome of the interventions for the behaviors, for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for behaviors. (Resident B) Finding includes: Resident B's record was reviewed on 8/11/23 at 7:16 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, depression. An admission Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 7/17/23, indicated an intact cognitive status, and physical behaviors, verbal behaviors, other behaviors, and rejection of care occurred one to three days. A Care Plan, dated 7/11/23 and revised on 8/9/23, indicated behaviors exhibited were refusals of care, medications/treatments, she dictated her care with the staff what she wants/doesn't want and what she will or won't do, demanding of staff when wants/needs could not be accommodated, threatened staff that she will just go home, has made multiple complaints about care, exhibited a rude/unpleasant demeanor, has been manipulative like making a request then refusing and then told others it was never offered,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-06-16 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure there was adequate nursing staff available to meet the residents' needs related to receiving scheduled showers for 1 of 9 units reviewed for staffing. (Unit 3A) Finding includes: On 6/14/23, the 3A unit was observed continuously from 10:15 to 11:40 a.m. The was one QMA and one CNA on the unit. There were 24 residents on the unit. There was no additional staff on the unit. The shower book indicated there were four residents scheduled to receive a shower that day on day shift. Interview with QMA 1 on 6/14/23 at 2:00 p.m., indicated there was only one CNA that day. There were sometimes two CNAs, or a split that would work two units. She indicated they would offer residents bed baths instead of showers when they were short staffed. Interview with CNA 1 on 5/14/23 at 2:25 p.m., indicated she was only able to give one of the four scheduled residents a shower that day. When working alone it was impossible to give all four showers during a shift. Interview with the Executive Director and the Administrator on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-06-16 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were labeled correctly related to eye drops, nasal sprays, and insulin with no labels and insulin in use that was expired for 3 of 5 medication carts observed. (3D, 2D, and 1A Medication Carts) Findings include: 1. On [DATE] at 10:26 a.m., the 3D Medication Cart was observed with QMA 3. Resident 149's insulin glargine 100 unit/milliter (mL) vial was labeled with an expiration date of [DATE]. QMA 3 indicated the resident was still receiving the medication nightly and the medication should have been disposed of on [DATE]. 2. On [DATE] at 2:05 p.m., the 2D Medication Cart was observed with LPN 1. The following medications were found in the cart: a. There was Aller-flo nasal spray, Refresh Tears, Combigan (eye drops), and a Novolog insulin vial opened on [DATE] in a drawer with no label. b. Resident 153's had two vials of Lantus insulin 100 unit/mL vial that were opened on [DATE] and [DATE]. She had a Humalog 100 unit/mL…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-06-16 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to follow proper sanitation and food handling practices related to the high temperature dish machine not reaching appropriate rinse temperature and use of expired sanitizer test strips for 1 of 1 kitchens. This had the potential to affect 170 residents who received food from the kitchen. (The Main Kitchen) Findings include: 1. On 6/14/23 at 9:40 a.m., the Dietary Food Manager (DFM) was observed wiping down a preparation counter with a sanitizer solution. At the time, a sanitizer test strip was used to test the solution. The test strips expired on 6/30/22. The strip did not have a readily discernable color change. The DFM brought another package of test strips to test the solution, which had expired on 3/1/22. The strip did not have a readily discernable color change. Interview with the DFM at the time indicated he would send someone out to purchase sanitizer test strips that were not expired. The Sanitation Bucket Log for the month of June 2023, received from the Executive Director on 6/15/23 at 3:51 p.m., indicated three…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-16 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a self-medication administration assessment was completed for residents with medications at the bedside for 2 of 2 random observations. (Residents H and F) Findings include: 1. On 6/12/23 at 11:33 a.m., Resident H was observed lying in her bed. There was a Symbicort inhaler on her bedside table. On 6/12/23 at 2:56 p.m., the inhaler was observed still on her bedside table The record for Resident H was reviewed on 6/15/23 at 9:09 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to cellulitis, dementia and neoplasm of the brain. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 5/26/23, indicated the resident had moderate cognitive deficits and required a total of 2 staff assistance for bed mobility and transfers. A Physician's Order, dated 5/20/23, indicated to give Symbicort Inhalation 2 puffs, twice daily. There was no self-medication administration assessment, care plan or Physician order to self administer medications. Interview with QMA 2 on 6/12/23 at 2:56 p.m., indicated she was not sure if the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-06-16 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, and interview, the facility failed to report, investigate the root cause, and resolve resident grievances for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for grievances. (Residents D and J) Findings include: 1. The record for Resident D was reviewed on 6/14/22 at 2:54 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, Parkinson's Disease, dementia with behavioral disturbance, and major depressive disorder. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 4/21/23, indicated the resident was mildly cognitively impaired and required extensive assist x 1 for personal hygiene and bathing. A Grievance form, dated 5/2/23, indicated the resident had not received her shower on 5/1/23. The findings indicated the resident's family had her shower day mixed up and the resident was given a shower on 5/3/23. A Grievance form, dated 5/3/23, indicated the resident's showers were not given consistently per the resident's daughter. The findings indicted the resident had not received her shower on the scheduled day and the shower was provided on the following day shift. A Grievance form,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-16 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure showers were provided as scheduled for a dependent resident for 1 of 11 residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL) care. (Resident L) Finding includes: On 6/12/23 at 1:01 p.m., Resident L indicated he wasn't getting his scheduled showers, he hadn't been showered in over a week. The resident's record was reviewed on 6/14/23 at 12:14 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, Muscular Sclerosis and Diabetes Mellitus. The Annual Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 5/4/23, indicated the resident was cognitively intact, and required extensive assistance of 2 for bed mobility and transfers. The shower schedule indicated the resident was to be showered on Wednesday and Saturday evenings. Shower sheets for the past 30 days indicated the resident had a bed bath on 5/6/23. The Point of Care charting (used by CNAs) indicated the resident got a shower on 5/25/23 and 6/7/23. There was no additional documentation. Interview with CNA 1 on 6/14/23 at 2:25 p.m., indicated she was the only CNA on the hall that day.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-16 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure skin discolorations were assessed and monitored, a treatment order for a bandage was in place, and a treatment was in place for dry and flaky legs for 3 of 7 residents reviewed for non-pressure skin conditions. (Residents H, 5 and D) Findings include: 1. On 6/12/23 at 11:33 a.m., Resident H was observed lying in her bed. There was a dark purplish discoloration on her left forearm and left thigh. The resident indicated she did not know what happened to the areas. On 6/13/23 at 10:09 a.m., the resident was again observed in bed and the discoloration to her left forearm and left thigh were visible. The record for Resident H was reviewed on 6/15/23 at 9:09 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to cellulitis, dementia and neoplasm of the brain. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 5/26/23, indicated the resident had moderate cognitive deficits and required total 2 staff assistance for bed mobility and transfers. A Medication Care Plan indicated the resident was at increased risk of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-16 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident's positioning was maintained related to a hand splint not applied as ordered for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for positioning/ mobility. (Resident 74) Finding includes: On 6/12/23 at 10:12 a.m., Resident 74 was observed in bed, there was no hand splint on her right hand. She was again observed in her room on 6/12/23 at 11:16 a.m., 6/14/23 at 9:25 a.m., 6/15/23 at 8:50 a.m., and 11:12 a.m., 6/16/23 at 9:41 a.m. and 10:21 a.m., with no hand splint on her right hand. The resident's record was reviewed on 6/16/23 at 10:08 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, chronic pain syndrome and hypertension. A Quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 4/4/23, indicated the resident was cognitively intact and required extensive assistance of two staff for bed mobility and transfers. A Physician's Order, dated 1/13/23, indicated to wear a splint to the right hand at all times, to be removed for skin checks each shift. The June 2023 Medication Administration Record indicated the right hand splint…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide supervision and follow protocols related to random observations of residents transferred by a Hoyer lift (suspension lift to reposition and transfer into a chair or bed) for 2 of 2 Hoyer transfers observed. (Residents B and 151) Findings include: 1. During a random observation on 6/14/23 at 9:30 a.m., CNA 2 was observed in Resident's B's room to transfer him from his bed to his wheelchair via a Hoyer lift. CNA 2 was the only staff member in the room completing the transfer. On 6/14/23 at 9:42 a.m., CNA 2 left the resident's room and the resident was sitting in his wheelchair. Record review for Resident B was completed on 6/13/23 at 2:00 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, stroke, hemiplegia, end stage renal disease, and respiratory failure. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 4/17/23, indicated the resident was cognitively impaired. The resident required a total 2+ person assist for transfers. The resident had an impairment on one side of his upper and lower…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-16 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident with a urinary tract infection (UTI) received the necessary treatment and services related to completing an ordered laboratory test timely for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for urinary tract infections. (Resident K) Finding includes: On 6/12/23 from 2:23 p.m. through 2:36 p.m., Resident K was observed lying in her bed. The resident was repetitively yelling out I need help. Where am I going to go? Somebody help me. Where will I go? The Unit Manager entered the room and spoke to the resident. Upon exiting the room, the resident again began repetitively yelling out. The record for Resident K was reviewed on 6/16/23 at 9:21 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, Alzheimer's Disease, hypertension, and atrial fibrillation. A Psych Services Progress Note, dated 6/1/23, indicated the resident was experiencing worsening behaviors and anxiety. A medication change was made, and a urinalysis (UA, urine test) was ordered. A Progress Note, dated 6/2/23, indicated the urine sample was obtained and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-16 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide proper respiratory care and services related to not changing nebulizer (machine that turns liquid medications into a mist to be inhaled) masks timely and not completing nebulizer treatment assessments as ordered for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for oxygen. (Resident B) Finding includes: On 6/12/23 at 10:33 a.m., a nebulizer mask was observed in a bag laying on Resident B's bed. The mask was dated 5/27. On 6/13/23 at 10:24 a.m., Resident B was observed lying in bed. A nebulizer mask was in a bag on the resident's wheelchair. The mask was dated 5/27. Record review for Resident B was completed on 6/13/23 at 2:00 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, stroke, hemiplegia, end stage renal disease, and respiratory failure. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 4/17/23, indicated the resident was cognitively impaired. The resident had received oxygen therapy. A Care Plan, dated 4/21/23, indicated the resident was at risk for respiratory distress related to respiratory failure. An…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-06-16 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from unnecessary psychoactive medications related to administration of an anti-anxiety medication as ordered and antipsychotic medication use for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications and 1 of 2 residents reviewed for behavior/ emotional care. (Residents D and K) Findings include: 1. The record for Resident D was reviewed on 6/14/22 at 2:54 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, Parkinson's Disease, dementia with behavioral disturbance, and major depressive disorder. The resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The Quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment, dated 4/21/23, indicated the resident had not had any behaviors. She received antipsychotic and antidepressant medications. A Progress Note, dated 1/20/23, indicated the resident's family was requesting she be started on Abilify (aripiprazole, an antipsychotic medication) as she would have hallucinations without the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2025-01-16 · tag F0732 — widespread
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the posted Nurse Staffing information was up-to-date and current. THis had the potential to affect all residents in the facility. Finding includes: The Nurse Staffing Information was posted on the desk by the front door of the facility and was observed on 1/13/25 at 9:13 a.m. The information posted was dated 1/8/25. During an interview on 1/13/25 at 9:15 a.m., the Administrator indicated either the Scheduler or the Nursing Supervisor was responsible for posting the current Nurse Staffing Information daily. This citation relates to Complaints IN00449509 and IN00450162.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to MAJESTIC CARE — 22 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 52.5-1.5 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.1-1.1 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 51.7-0.7 vs chain
Quality measures 3 of 54.5-1.5 vs chain
The other 21 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.5★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
PULASKI MEMORIAL HOSPITALOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 10/01/2020
WOOD, CATHYIndividualCONTRACTED MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 10/01/2020
BARRY, THOMASIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 10/01/2020
MALOTT, GREGGIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 10/01/2020

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$26.2M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+16.0%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$4.0M
Related-party expense18% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 68%Medicare 15%Other / private 18%

This home reported $4.0M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 18% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$349per resident / day
operating cost
$10,606per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$415per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IN

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Indiana Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Indiana
$8,943/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,326/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,639/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 155214. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-06-16, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next