No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Majestic Care Of New Lexington

920 South Main Street, New Lexington, OH 43764 · For profit - Corporation · 82 certified beds · (740) 342-5161 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (740) 342-5161 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citations — no harm found (F0604, F0605) — most recent Mar 2026Resident-funds citation (F0569)Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)3 actual-harm citations1 Medicare payment denial
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

Worth asking about
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0605) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0569)
  • it has 3 actual-harm citations
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (42) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★ 2/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
203 N Main St · (740) 342-1991 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
510 N Main St · (740) 342-5133 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
512 N Main St · (740) 342-3360 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Orchard Ave · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 3 to 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating4★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased6.5%5.3%15.4%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight6.5%6.2%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.2%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%0.4%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms17.7%30.1%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.4%3.2%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened12.4%6.1%16.1%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication25.7%25.5%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%94.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers1.5%3.4%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control23.2%21.4%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table5.4%8.8%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine82.5%75.6%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission7.4%24.9%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit13.3%12.9%12.0%worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

60.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 46 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

60.0%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.7%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
33.3%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.13U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.06hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.06hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 33.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 24 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.13 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 9% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 12% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF60.0%CMS range 46.4–72.351.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.7%CMS range 6.2–15.010.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge33.3%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge25.0%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge20.8%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened3.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.5%CMS range 3.3–11.87.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.021.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.65
RN hours/ resident / day
0.92
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.52
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.09
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.44
RN hoursweekends
38.2%
Total nursing turnover
44.4%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 82 beds and averages 67.9 residents a day — about 83% occupied, or roughly 14 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.09 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.65 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.52 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.64 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.27 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.73 to 0.44 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 38% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

14
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-03-16)
4
at the previous standard inspection (2024-10-31)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

42 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 29 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2026-01-07 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on closed record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to provide care and services to prevent multiple avoidable pressure ulcers from developing or worsening. This affected two residents (#39 and #65) of six residents reviewed for skin breakdown. The facility census was 63.Actual Harm occurred on 09/08/25 when Resident #65, who was assessed to be high risk for skin breakdown developed deep tissue injuries (Intact skin with localized area of persistent non-blanchable deep red, maroon, purple discoloration due to damage of underlying soft tissue. This area may be preceded by tissue that is painful, firm, mushy, boggy, warmer or cooler as compared to adjacent tissue. These changes often precede skin color changes and discoloration may appear differently in darkly pigmented skin. This injury results from intense and/or prolonged pressure and shear forces at the bone-muscle interface. The wound may evolve rapidly to reveal the actual extent of tissue injury, or may resolve without tissue…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2024-02-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to prevent residents from falling. This affected two residents (#62, #82) of three residents reviewed for accidents. The facility census was 59. Actual Harm occurred on 02/02/24 when Resident #62 was being prepared for a transfer from her wheelchair to her bed by one staff member who then left her alone unsupervised. Resident #62 fell from her wheelchair and sustained a fracture to her right wrist. Actual Harm occurred on 02/10/24 when Resident #82, who required a dependent assist from staff for transfers, fell in the bathroom when left unsupervised and sustained a right hip fracture resulting in hospitalization. Findings included: 1. Record review revealed Resident #62 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including multiple sclerosis, stiffness of left elbow, chronic pain syndrome, hyperlipidemia, scoliosis, osteoarthritis, and mild cognitive impairment. Review of a minimum data set (MDS)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-02-26 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide adequate hydration to a resident, who depended on staff for assistance with drinking fluids, to meet the resident's hydration needs. This affected one resident (#62) of one resident reviewed for dehydration. The facility census was 59. Actual Harm occurred to Resident #62 on [DATE] when the facility failed to provide the resident with adequate fluid intake and the resident was admitted to the hospital for treatment of acute kidney injury and dehydration. Findings included: Record review revealed Resident #62 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including multiple sclerosis, stiffness of left elbow, chronic pain syndrome, hyperlipidemia, scoliosis, osteoarthritis, and mild cognitive impairment. Review of a minimum data set (MDS) assessment completed on [DATE] revealed Resident #62 had a brief interview for mental status score of two (severe cognitive impairment), had no behaviors, had impairment to bilateral upper…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-03-16 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — widespread
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, staff interview and review of facility policy, the facility failed to dispose of expired medications. One of two medications rooms and two of four medications carts were reviewed. This had the potential to affect all 70 residents residing at the facility. Findings include:Review of the most recent consulting pharmacist report dated 03/02/26 revealed audits were completed for medication rooms, medication and treatment carts and cold storage (refrigerators) and expired medications found in medication carts and treatment carts and items not stored per manufacturer guidelines.Observation and interview on 03/11/26 at 8:30 A.M. with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #155 of the [NAME] medication room revealed one opened bottle of sodium chloride (mineral) one gram (gm) with an expiration date of 09/2025 and an open date of 02/2026, one unopened bottle of zinc (mineral) 50 milligrams (mg) with an expiration date of 01/2026, one opened bottle of aspirin 325 milligrams (mg) with an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-03-16 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interview, the facility failed to ensure expired food items were not kept in the kitchen. The had the potential residents who utilized cream for their beverages. The facility census was 70.Findings include:Observation on 03/09/26 at 8:19 A.M. revealed the dry storage area of the kitchen contained four large containers of expired coffee creamer. Two expired on 12/24/19 and two expired in 03/2020.Interview on 03/09/26 at 8:20 A.M. with Dietary Manager #107 confirmed there were expired coffee creamers in the dry storage area. She stated they were not used by the kitchen, but were used by activity staff.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-03-16 · tag F0887 — pattern
    Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were educated on and had the opportunity to receive the updated annual COVID-19 vaccine, if they desired to do so. This affected four (Residents #2, #5, #7, and #68) of five residents reviewed for immunizations.Findings include:1. Review of Resident #2's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), adult onset diabetes mellitus, heart failure, chronic ischemic heart disease, and personal history of COVID-19. Review of Resident #2's informed consents for immunizations revealed it was absent for any evidence of the resident having been educated on the COVID-19 vaccine for the 2025- 2026 respiratory illness season (October thru March) or that the updated COVID-19 vaccine was even offered to the resident. Her immunization record revealed the last time a COVID-19 vaccine had been given to the resident was on 10/09/24.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-16 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident receiving psychotropic medications signed consent for the use of those medications, after the risks and benefits associated to their use were explained to the resident. This affected one (Resident #5) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications.Findings include:Review of Resident #5's medical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included Schizo-affective disorder, dementia, Bipolar disorder, major depressive disorder, and anxiety.Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #5 was able to make himself understood and was able to understand others and cognitively intact. Resident #5 had verbal behaviors directed at others and other behaviors not directed at others. Resident #5 received anti-psychotic medications, anti-anxiety medications, and anti-depressants during the review period. Review of Resident #5's physician's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-16 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, resident and staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the rooms were kept in good repair. This affected one (#8) of one resident reviewed for environmental concerns. The facility census was 70.Findings include: Record review revealed Resident #8 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebrovascular accident and anxiety disorder.Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #8's cognition was intact.Interview and observation on 03/10/26 at 9:00 A.M. with Resident #8 revealed his room had large white patches on the wall next to his window, black scuffs on the bottom of the walls in the entry way of the room, a missing wheel to the left upper side of his bed, the lower bathroom door had a plastic cover to it which had cracked and was loose with sharp edges, in the bathroom the paper towel holder had been moved and paint had peeled away and not repaired, two holes…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-16 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
    Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, policy review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident was comprehensively assessed and provided medical necessity for a resident to reside in the memory care unit. This affected one (#24) of one resident reviewed for restraints. The facility census was 70.Findings include:Record review revealed Resident #24 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including schizophrenia and dementia.Review of an elopement risk assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #24 was not at risk of elopement.Review of a late entry interdisciplinary team (IDT) note dated 07/28/25 at 8:39 A.M. by Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) #500 revealed the IDT reviewed a situation with Resident #24 and due to increased falls and attempting to drink hand sanitizer throughout the facility, the resident and family were agreeable to move to the locked memory care unit to increase activity time and monitor closely.Review of an order dated 09/06/25 revealed Resident #24 resided on the secure unit to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-16 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews and medical record review, the facility failed to monitor potential side effects of psychotropic medications for Resident #64. This affected one (#64) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 70.Findings include:Review of Resident #64's medical record revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] and diagnoses included depression and anxiety disorder.Review of the current physician's order list for March 2026 revealed the following active orders: Duloxetine HCl Capsule Delayed Release Particles 20 milligrams (mg) one one capsule by mouth two times a day for depression with a start date of 11/20/25 and Lorazepam oral tablet one mg, give one tablet by mouth two times a day for restlessness; anxiety and give one tablet by mouth every one hour as needed for restlessness, anxiety with a start date of 12/20/25. There were no physician orders to monitor for side effects of the antidepressant or antianxiety medications.Review of Resident #64's care plan…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-16 · tag F0628 — isolated
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident, who was transferred out of the facility to the hospital, received a transfer notice and a bed hold notice, at or around the time of the transfer. This affected one (Resident #74) of three closed records reviewed for transfer/ discharges. Findings include:Review of Resident #74's closed medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included acute kidney failure, kidney transplant status, retention of urine, and anxiety disorder. The progress note dated 12/29/25 at 6:30 A.M. revealed Resident #74 had a change in condition and was sent to the emergency room for an evaluation. He was admitted to the hospital and did not return to the facility. There was no evidence of a transfer notice or a bed hold notice was provided too the resident and/ or his family at/ or around the time of his transfer in Resident #74's medical record. On 03/11/26 at 8:55 A.M., an interview with the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-16 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure comprehensive resident-centered care plans were in place. This affected one (#12) of 23 residents reviewed for care plans.Findings include:Record review revealed Resident #12 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia, anxiety disorder, paranoid personality disorder, and suicide ideations.Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #12's cognition was severely impaired, she had behaviors including delusions, and other behaviors one to three days in the review period.Review of the care plan dated 02/03/26 revealed there was no care plan related to Resident #12 having a history of suicidal ideations.Interview on 03/11/26 at 12:43 P.M. with Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed Resident #12 did not have a care plan in place to address her history of suicidal ideations.Review of the policy titled Comprehensive Care Plan dated 11/01/24 revealed the facility should…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-16 · tag F0742 — isolated
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with mental disorder or psychosocial adjustment difficulty, or who has a history of trauma and/or post-traumatic stress disorder.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure protocol was followed after an incident of suicidal ideation. This affected one (#12) of one resident reviewed for suicidal ideation. The facility census was 70.Findings include:Record review revealed Resident #12 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia, anxiety disorder, paranoid personality disorder, and suicide ideations.Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #12's cognition was severely impaired, she had behaviors including delusions, other behaviors one to three days in the look back period, and wandered one to three days in the look back period.Review of the nursing note dated 11/10/25 at 2:01 A.M. by Registered Nurse (RN) #113 revealed Resident #12 was suicidal and stated she would kill herself. Resident #12 had been looking for her jackets and there was no jacket. RN #113 told her the jackets were dirty and sent to laundry which was closed at night.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 29 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-16 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident receiving an anti-hypertensive medication had his blood pressure obtained and recorded at the time of the anti-hypertensive medications administration, when the physician's orders included parameters to notify the physician if the resident's systolic blood pressure (SBP) was greater than 100 millimeters of mercury (mmHg). This affected one (Resident #5) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications.Findings include: Review of Resident #5's medical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included the diagnosis of hypertension (high blood pressure). Review of Resident #5's physician's orders revealed the resident had an order in place to receive Metoprolol Succinate (a beta blocker used in the treatment of hypertension) Extended Release (ER) 25 milligrams (mg) by mouth every night at bedtime for hypertension. The order included a parameter to call the physician, if the resident's SBP (top…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-16 · tag F0773 — isolated
    Provide or obtain laboratory tests/services when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to complete lab work as physician ordered. This affected one (#68) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 70.Findings include:Record review revealed Resident #68 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Parkinson's disease and edema.The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #68's cognition was intact.Review of the physician orders revealed on 07/30/24, Resident #68 would have the following laboratory (lab) blood draws every three months (August, November, February, and May): complete blood count (CBC), basic metabolic panel, vitamin D, B12, lipid panel, liver panel, and prealbumin.The care plan dated 03/28/25 revealed Resident #68 was at risk for fluid imbalance due to diuretic use related to edema. Interventions included lab work as ordered. Review of the laboratory results revealed Resident #68 last had lab work completed on 08/28/25. There were no lab…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-16 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident received timely dental services. This affected one (#25) of one resident reviewed for dental care. The facility census was 70.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #25 revealed an admission date of 11/30/23 with diagnoses including dementia with behavioral disturbance, depression, dysphagia, and anxiety disorder.Review of the dental consult dated 09/11/25 revealed Resident #25 had a referral to an oral surgeon to extract of all symptomatic teeth.The progress note dated 09/16/25 authored by Transportation Aide (TA) #176 revealed they a faxed referral to Dental Clinic #1. On 10/15/25 a progress note authored by TA #176 indicating a referral was faxed to referral to Oral Surgery and Dental Implants #2. On 10/22/25, a telephone call placed to Oral Surgery and Dental Implants #2 asking if they take Medicaid. On 11/07/25, an email was sent to Family Dental #3 by TA #176. The dental consult dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-16 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the resident's medical record had accurate documentation for care related to a resident's Jackson Pratt (JP) drain. This affected one (Resident #60) of 23 residents reviewed for medical record accuracy.Findings include:Review of Resident #60's closed medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included a malignant neoplasm of her rectum and status post colostomy placement. She remained in the facility until 03/04/26, when she was discharged home. Review of Resident #60's initial skin evaluation completed on 01/28/26 revealed one JP drain (a closed-suction medical device used after surgery to remove excess fluid from the body, preventing infection and promoting healing; it consisted of a silicone tube connected to a bulb that, when squeezed, created a gentle vacuum to pull fluid into a collection chamber) was present to her lower abdominal area. The other two JP drains were indicated to be in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-07 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide ordered treatment of a thoracic abscess, daily weights and monitoring intake and outputs for a resident on fluid restrictions. This affected two residents (#39, #66) of eight resident records reviewed. The census was 63. Findings include:1. Record review revealed Resident #66 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including methicillin susceptible staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) infection, endocarditis, and altered mental status. Resident #66 discharged from the facility on 12/26/25. Review of an email sent to the facility on [DATE] revealed Resident #66 would need a wound vac and orders were attached. Review of an order dated 12/04/25 revealed Resident #66's wound needed a wound vac for a wound to left chest at pressure setting 125 (standard) with no wound vac cover, the wound vac dressing would need changed three times a week and as needed, cover with white foam and wound cleanser would be normal saline. The suction…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-07 · tag F0773 — isolated
    Provide or obtain laboratory tests/services when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to obtain laboratory services as ordered. This affected one resident (#39) of eight resident records reviewed. The census was 63. Findings included:Review of Resident #39's medical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included urinary tract infection, cord compression, extradural and subdural abscess, chronic kidney disease, pressure ulcer unstageable and diabetes.Review of the admission minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed his cognition was intact. He required set up or clean up assistance for eating, oral hygiene, dependent for toileting, shower/bathing, dressing, personal hygiene and turning and repositioning. Resident #39 had an indwelling catheter and was frequently incontinent of bowel. Further review revealed a physician's order on 12/04/25 for a complete blood count (CBC), e-diff (electronic differential), platelets, basic metabolic profile (BMP) without glucose, hepatic function panel weekly…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-01 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, observations and facility policy, the facility failed to maintain a safe and homelike environment for four residents ( #11, #20, #30, and #40) of four residents reviewed. The facility census was 56. Findings include: Observation on 03/31/25 at 12:35 P.M. of private room [ROOM NUMBER] revealed in the bathroom, a small quarter size rusted hole through the sink. Interview on 03/31/25 at 12:59 P.M. with the Director of Nursing revealed the facility did an audit for the entire facility on resident's bathroom conditions on 03/06/25 and found two sinks that had rusted holes found in room [ROOM NUMBER] as well as the shared bathroom for rooms #106 and #108. Verified room [ROOM NUMBER] is now unoccupied, but did have Resident #11 when she was at the facility. room [ROOM NUMBER] has Resident #30 and #40 currently and room [ROOM NUMBER] has Resident #20 currently. Observed on 03/31/25 at 1:21 P.M. of the shared bathroom for rooms #106 and #108 revealed a baseball sized hole that was rusted through the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-01 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record reviews, and facility validation accessing implanted vascular access port guidelines the facility failed to ensure an antibiotic was ordered correctly and an implanted vascular access port (port a cath) was accessed with a physician's order. This affected one resident (#11) of two residents reviewed for indwelling devices and antibiotics. The facility census was 56. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #11, revealed an admission date of 02/12/25 and a was sent to the hospital when at Fairfield Healthcare Professional Hematology and Oncology infusion appointment on 03/07/25. Diagnoses included but were not limited to partial intestinal obstruction, malignant neoplasm of colon, moderate protein-calorie malnutrition, osteoarthritis, iron deficient anemia, essential hypertension and personal history of venous thrombosis and embolism. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 15…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-17 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident, who was dependent on staff for personal care, received the assistance needed with routine incontinence care and repositioning as needed when up in her wheelchair. This affected one (Resident #39) of three residents reviewed. Findings include: Review of Resident #39's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included multiple sclerosis (MS), cognitive communication deficit, abnormal posture, scoliosis, morbid obesity, mild cognitive impairment of uncertain or unknown etiology, and chronic pain syndrome. Review of Resident #39's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was usually able to make herself understood and was usually able to understand others. Her cognition was severely impaired, she was not known to display any behaviors nor was she known to reject care. She had a functional limitation in range…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-31 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview and policy review the facility failed to begin the discharge planning process upon admission. This affected one (Resident #39) of one residents reviewed for choices. The facility census was 62. Findings included: Record review revealed Resident #39 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic and acute respiratory failure, muscle weakness, and difficulty in walking. Review of an assessment titled Interdisciplinary Care Conference Summary dated 10/04/24 revealed Resident #39 would receive long term care and would apply for Medicaid. Review of the sign in sheet for the care conference revealed only the social worker and nursing staff signed in. The resident and family did not sign in. Review of an admission minimum data set (MDS) completed on 10/08/24 revealed Resident #39 remained cognitively intact, had no behaviors, and had a discharge goal to remain in the facility. Review of a care plan dated 10/22/24 revealed Resident #39 would remain in the facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-31 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to maintain a comprehensive plan of care and properly implement pressure relieving interventions. This affected one resident (#165) of two residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility census was 62. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #165 revealed an admission date of 10/19/24. Diagnoses included but were not limited to encounter for orthopedic aftercare following surgical amputation, acquired absence of right and left leg above the knees, type 2 diabetes, depression and peripheral vascular disease. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 12 indicating moderate cognitive impairment. The resident was assessed to require partial/moderate assistance with bed mobility, dependence with toilet hygiene and transfers. No wound assessment was completed due to assessment still in progress from being a new…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-31 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to set parameters for as needed diuretic medication based on weight gain. This affected one of six residents (Resident#50) sampled for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 62. Findings include: Review of Resident #50's medical record revealed an admission date of 01/05/23 with diagnoses including acute systolic congestive heart failure, myocardial infarction, nonrheumatic aortic (valve) stenosis, and anxiety. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set(MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the resident had severe cognitive impairment. Further review of the MDS revealed an active diagnosis for heart failure. Review of Resident #50's physician's orders revealed an order for furosemide oral tablet (a diuretic medication), give 20 milligrams (mg) by mouth every 24 hours as needed for weight gain and an order to weigh the resident daily. Review of Resident #50's care plan revealed no care plans were present for the use of diuretic medication, daily…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-31 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to maintain infection control procedures during a dressing change. This affected one (Resident #18) of two residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The census was 62. Findings include: Review of Resident #18's medical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included multiple sclerosis, paraplegia, peripheral vascular disease (PVD) and anxiety. Review of the quarterly minimum data set assessment dated [DATE] revealed his cognition was intact (BIMS of 15). Functional limitations in range of motion to the lower extremities (Impairment on both sides), and used a wheelchair for mobility. The resident had an indwelling suprapubic (a tube that drains urine through a small incision in the abdomen) urinary catheter and was always incontinent of bowel. Review of the physicians orders revealed an order to cleanse the coccyx area with wound cleanser, pat dry, apply medihoney (a medical grade honey…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-26 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interviews, and review of the AccuWeather forecast the facility failed to ensure Resident #29's window was shut during cold weather. This affected one resident (#29) of three sampled residents reviewed. The facility census was 60. Findings Include: Review of the medical record for Resident #29 revealed an initial admission date of 06/08/19 with the latest readmission of 02/12/24 with diagnoses including fracture of lower end of right ulna, pneumonitis due to inhalation of food and vomit, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, metabolic encephalopathy, multiple sclerosis (MS), dysphagia, osteoarthritis, dry eye syndrome, hyperlipidemia, chronic pain syndrome, scoliosis, insomnia, hypothyroidism, major depressive disorder, repeated falls, anxiety disorder and constipation. Review of the resident's five-day Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #29 had unclear speech, usually made herself understood, usually understood others, and had severe cognitive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-26 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide showers as scheduled and per resident preference. This affected two residents (#13, #22) of five residents reviewed for quality of care. The facility census was 59. Findings included: 1. Record review revealed Resident #13 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including multiple sclerosis, paraplegia, and chronic fatigue. Review of a minimum data set (MDS) completed on 10/20/23 revealed Resident #13 maintains capacity, it is very important to him to choose between a tub bath, shower, sponge bath or bed bath, and is dependent on staff for bathing. Review of a care plan completed on 11/10/23 revealed Resident #13 prefers to have showers in the afternoon. Review of a shower schedule revealed Resident #13 was scheduled to receive showers on Mondays, Wednesdays, and Fridays. Review of shower documentation revealed Resident #13 received a bed bath on 01/17/24, a bed bath on 01/19/24, was not applicable on 01/22/24, a bed bath on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-26 · tag F0573 — isolated
    Let each resident or the resident's legal representative access or purchase copies of all the resident's records.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide access to medical records. This affected one resident (#82) of one residents reviewed for medical records. The facility census was 59. Findings included: Record review revealed Resident #82 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia without behaviors, orthostatic hypotension, non-st elevation myocardial infarction, bipolar disorder, congestive heart failure, major depression, anemia, hypertension, and cardiomegaly. Review of a minimum data set completed on 11/17/23 revealed Resident #82's cognition did not remain intact, did not have behaviors, she used a walker and a wheelchair, required maximum assistance for toileting hygiene, maximum assistance for toilet transfers, moderate assistance to walk 10 feet, was dependent for wheelchair use, and was occasionally incontinent. Resident #82 had a durable power of attorney (DPOA). Review of the medical record did not contain any evidence the facility processed a request…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-26 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to maintain accurate care plans to reflect current mobility status. This affected one resident (#82) of four residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 59. Findings included: Record review revealed Resident #82 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia without behaviors, orthostatic hypotension, non-st elevation myocardial infarction, bipolar disorder, congestive heart failure, major depression, anemia, hypertension, and cardiomegaly. Review of a minimum data set completed on 11/17/23 revealed Resident #82's cognition did not remain intact, did not have behaviors, she used a walker and a wheelchair, required maximum assistance for toileting hygiene, maximum assistance for toilet transfers, moderate assistance to walk 10 feet, was dependent for wheelchair use, and was occasionally incontinent. Review of a hospice note dated 01/29/24 revealed Resident #82 was no longer able to walk, unable to stand and pivot…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-26 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to communicate a speech therapy recommendation to the physician thereby delaying a diagnostic test. This affected one resident (#34) of five residents reviewed for quality of care. The facility census was 59. Findings included: Record review revealed Resident #34 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including pulmonary embolism, altered mental status, unspecified dementia, and hypertension. Review of a minimum data set (MDS) completed on 12/07/23 revealed Resident #34 had no signs of a swallowing disorder, had a five percent or greater weight loss in one month or ten percent or greater weight loss in the last six months without being on a prescribed weight-loss regimen, and was receiving a mechanically altered diet. Review of a care plan updated on 02/02/24 revealed Resident #34 had a potential from nutritional problem related to advanced age, dementia, morbid obesity, mechanically altered diet, moisture associated skin damage, varied…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-26 · tag F0685 — isolated
    Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to replace Resident #62's broken glasses. This affected one resident (#62) of four residents reviewed for accidents. The facility census was 59. Findings included: Record review revealed Resident #62 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including multiple sclerosis, osteoarthritis, dry eye syndrome of unspecified lacrimal gland, hyperlipidemia, chronic pain syndrome, scoliosis, repeated falls, mild cognitive impairment, anxiety, and major depression. Care plan review revealed Resident #34 was at risk for falls related to multiple sclerosis, chronic pain, psychiatric medication use, pain medication use, and incontinence of bladder. Interventions included placing glasses within reach and encourage use. Review of a preliminary list for a vision clinic for 03/19/24 revealed Resident #62 was not on the list for the upcoming eye doctor appointment. Observation on 02/13/24 at 1:57 P.M. of Resident #62 revealed the resident was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-03 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review and Ohio Revised Code review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was permitted to choose his Power of Attorney (POA) and failed to ensure POA paperwork was legal. This affected one resident (#63) of three residents reviewed for POA concerns. The facility census was 60. Findings included: Review of Resident #63's closed medical record revealed an admission date of [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic kidney disease, stage 3 B, mild cognitive impairment of uncertain or unknown etiology, urine retention, and essential hypertension. He expired in the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident #63's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated [DATE], revealed he was cognitively impaired. Review of Resident #63's Clinical Resident Profile revealed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #2 was his POA. Review of Resident #63's State of Ohio Health Care Power of Attorney, dated [DATE], revealed it was signed by the Principal (Resident #63) and witnessed by LPN #1 providing LPN…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-03 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NON-COMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure vascular wounds were properly assessed, treatments were completed as ordered by the physician, and a care plan was developed for his vascular wounds to meet the resident needs. This affected one resident (#63) of three residents reviewed for wounds. The facility census was 60. Findings included: Review of Resident #63's medical record revealed an admission date of [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic kidney disease, stage 3 B, mild cognitive impairment of uncertain or unknown etiology, urine retention, and essential hypertension. He expired in the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident #63's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated [DATE], revealed he was cognitively impaired. Further review also revealed he did not have any venous or arterial ulcers and no other skin issues.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-03 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NON-COMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on record review, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure pressure ulcer treatments were completed as ordered by the physician and a care plan was developed to meet the resident needs. This affected one resident (#63) of three residents reviewed for wounds. The facility census was 60. Findings included: Review of Resident #63's closed medical record revealed an admission date of [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic kidney disease, stage 3 B, mild cognitive impairment of uncertain or unknown etiology, urine retention, and essential hypertension. He expired in the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident #63's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated [DATE], revealed he was cognitively impaired. Further review also revealed he did not have any pressure ulcers and no other skin issues. Review of Resident #63's Skin Grid Pressure, dated [DATE],…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-03 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure weights were obtained for a new admission to the facility and failed to ensure weights were completed per physician order. This affected one resident (#63) of three residents reviewed for weight loss. The facility census was 60. Findings included: Review of Resident #63's closed medical record revealed an admission date of [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic kidney disease, stage 3 B, mild cognitive impairment of uncertain or unknown etiology, urine retention, and essential hypertension. He expired in the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident #63's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated [DATE], revealed he was cognitively impaired. He had no or unknown weight loss or gain and was on a therapeutic diet. Review of Resident #63's weights revealed his first weight was completed on [DATE] and he weighed 174.2 pounds; his second weight was on [DATE] and he weighed 177.0 pounds, and his next weight was on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-09-07 · tag F0569 — pattern
    Notify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of resident fund accounts and staff interview, the facility failed to notify each resident that received Medicaid benefits when the amount in the account reached $200 less that the resource limit for one person. This affected three of five residents whose fund accounts were reviewed (Residents #8, #42, and #43). Findings include: 1. Review of the resident fund account for Resident #8 revealed a balance on 06/03/22 of $3623.23. The balance remained above $1800.00 until 07/29/22 when it was $1779.72. On 08/03/22 the balance went to $3641.75. As of 09/01/22, the balance remained above $1800.00 and was $1830.75. There was no evidence the resident/responsible party was notified that the balance had reached $200 less than the resource limit. This was confirmed by the Business Office Manager on 09/01/22 at 2:40 P.M. 2. Review of the resident fund account for Resident #42 revealed a balance on 08/03/22 of $3171.17. The balance remained above $1800.00 as of 09/01/22, with a balance of $1800.67. There was no evidence the resident/responsible party was notified that the balance…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-09-07 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was dependent on staff for personal care received the assistance needed to trim and clean her fingernails. This affected one (Resident #23) of two residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL's). Findings include: A review of Resident #23's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included Parkinson's disease, type II (adult onset) diabetes mellitus, dementia without behavioral disturbances, major depressive disorder osteoarthritis, chronic pain, and vision problems. A review of Resident #23's active physician's orders revealed she had been admitted under the care and services of hospice. The diagnosis for admission to hospice was Parkinson's disease. A review of a significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #23 had clear speech. She was sometimes able to make herself understood and was sometimes able to understand others.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-09-07 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to identify and monitor bruising for a resident receiving oral anticoagulants, who was noted with a bruise to the upper right arm. This affected one (Resident #29) of the five residents reviewed for medication review. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #29 revealed an admission date of 06/04/22. Diagnoses included aftercare following surgical amputation, atherosclerosis of native arteries of the bilateral lower extremities, and peripheral vascular disease. Review of Resident #29's comprehension Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating the resident had an intact cognition for daily decision making abilities. Resident #29 required limited assistance from two staff members for bed mobility, and extensive assistance from two staff members for transfers, dressing, toilet use, and personal hygiene. Resident #29 was noted to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-09-07 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of the facility's contingency drug supply, review of pharmacy receipts, policy review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident received an antibiotic as ordered by the physician for the treatment of a urinary tract infection (UTI). This affected one (Resident #9) of one resident reviewed for UTI's. Findings include: A review of Resident #9's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease, schizophrenia, schizo-affective disorder, and mild intellectual disability. She did not have recurrent UTI's or other urinary related diagnoses noted on her diagnoses list. A review of Resident #9's nurses' progress notes revealed she had a nurse's note dated 07/03/22 that revealed the resident had complaints of burning with urination. The physician was notified and a new order was received to obtain a urinalysis and culture and sensitivity (U/A C&S) in indicated to be obtained on 07/06/22. The obtaining of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-09-07 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of the facility's contingency drug supply, review of pharmacy receipts, policy review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure antibiotics ordered for the treatment of urinary tract infections (UTI's) were readily made available by their contracted pharmacy for timely administration and to ensure antibiotic therapy could be completed as ordered by the physician. This affected one (Resident #9) of one residents reviewed for UTI's. Findings include: A review of Resident #9's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease, schizophrenia, schizo-affective disorder, and mild intellectual disability. She did not have recurrent UTI's or other urinary related diagnoses noted on her diagnoses list. A review of Resident #9's nurses' progress notes revealed she had a nurse's note dated 07/03/22 that revealed the resident had complaints of burning with urination. The physician was notified and a new order was received to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-09-07 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure antipsychotic medications were not used without an adequate indication for use. This affected two (Resident #10 and #48) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings include: 1. A review of Resident #10's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease and dementia without behavioral disturbances. A review of Resident #10's active physician's orders revealed the resident was receiving Seroquel 25 milligrams (mg) by mouth (po) every night at bedtime for mood swings and agitation. The order originated on 05/10/22 but was most recently re-ordered on 05/27/22. A review of Resident #10's psychiatry notes revealed she was first seen by a psychiatrist at the facility on 04/18/22 for an initial visit. The reason for the visit was indicated to be for medication management for mood instability and lability and wandering. The history of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-03-23 for 4 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to MAJESTIC CARE — 22 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 3 of 52.5+0.5 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.1-0.1 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 51.7+0.3 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.5+0.5 vs chain
The other 21 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.5★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
MDG MAJESTIC OHIO OPERATIONS HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 12/31/2024
MARX, DAVIDIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/31/2024
CHAMBERLAIN, MARGARETIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 09/11/2023
PRUITT, PAULIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/31/2024
MAJESTIC MANAGEMENT LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/11/2025
ALEXANDER, DAVIDIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/31/2024
MUMMA, PAULIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/31/2024
MYERS, GARRETTIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/31/2024
REWA, ANGELAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/31/2024
RUSSELL, ROBERTIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/31/2024
SHATROV, ANZHELIKAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/31/2024
WOLFE, ERICIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/31/2024
MDG MAJESTIC OHIO PROPERTY HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/31/2024
NEW LEXINGTON OH HEALTH & REHAB REALTY LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/31/2024

CMS files one row per role, so the 26 rows in the source record cover these 14 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$6.6M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-8.3%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.1M
Related-party expense15% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 58%Medicare 7%Other / private 35%

This home reported $1.1M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 15% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$320per resident / day
operating cost
$9,732per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$296per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Ohio
$9,186/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,389/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,103/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 365578. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-03-16, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next