No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Majestic Care Of Middletown LLC

6898 Hamilton Middletown Road, Middletown, OH 45044 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 200 certified beds · (513) 424-5321 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited May 2026Resident-funds citations (F0567, F0569)1 immediate-jeopardy citation$108,164 in federal fines1 Medicare payment denial
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited May 2026
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has citations for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0567, F0569)
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (60) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $108,164 in federal fines (most recent 2024-02-14)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • about 18% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 4 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
35 Overbrook Dr Ste 100 · (513) 539-7356 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
440 Oxford State Rd · (513) 423-9243 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Kroger0.7 mi
428 Oxford State Rd · (513) 423-5161 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Crossings Blvd · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
6879 Hamilton Middletown Rd · (513) 423-4953

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased2.6%5.3%15.4%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight4.8%6.2%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.2%0.2%0.9%typical for the state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.4%0.4%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms22.7%30.1%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.4%3.2%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened2.1%6.1%16.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication35.5%25.5%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine94.9%94.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers4.5%3.4%4.7%typical
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control26.9%21.4%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table10.9%8.8%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.1%1.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine71.7%75.6%79.4%typical

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

46.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 36 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

46.2%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.5%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
0.20U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.09hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.08hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.03hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.20 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 21% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 24% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF46.2%CMS range 31.2–58.551.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.5%CMS range 5.9–14.310.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identifiednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF staynot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsenednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.191.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.33
RN hours/ resident / day
1.30
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.81
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.43
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.13
RN hoursweekends
45.3%
Total nursing turnover
57.1%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 200 beds and averages 127.3 residents a day — about 64% occupied, or roughly 73 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.43 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.33 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.81 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.01 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.60 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.41 to 0.13 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 45% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

6
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-06-05)
15
at the previous standard inspection (2023-03-29)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

60 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 48 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · J2024-04-29 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, death certificate review, policy review, dialysis center record review, physician interview, staff interview, and dialysis center staff interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident #06, with a diagnosis of end-stage renal disease (ESRD), received scheduled hemodialysis treatments as ordered by the physician. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy and the potential for serious life-threatening harm, injuries, and/or death when Resident #06 went four days without hemodialysis treatments due to the facility's failure to communicate and coordinate continuity of care with the dialysis center, failure to transport the resident to hemodialysis treatments and failure to notify the physician of the resident not receiving ordered treatments. Resident #06 suffered cardiopulmonary arrest and expired in the facility on 01/21/24. This affected one (Resident #06) of five residents (#06, #07, #08 #139 and #162) reviewed for hemodialysis services in an outpatient setting. The facility also…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-03-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of hospital documentation, review of a fall investigation, observations, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to provide adequate assistance and supervision while a resident was sitting on the side of the bed, to prevent the resident from falling. This resulted in Actual Harm when Resident #06 was left unassisted on the side of the bed and the resident had an avoidable fall off the bed. Resident #06 sustained fractures of the femur and humerus which required surgical intervention. The affected one (#06) out of three residents reviewed for falls. Additionally, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to Resident #91 while he smoked, which placed the resident at risk for more than minimal harm. This affected one (#91) of three resident reviewed for smoking. The facility census was 145. Findings included: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #06 revealed an admission date of 08/29/22 with medical diagnoses of depression, congestive heart…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-01 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, review of self-reported incident (SRI), and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from verbal abuse. This affected one, (Resident #152) out of three (Residents #07, #45, #152) reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 128. Findings include:Medical record review for Resident #152 revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged from the facilityto home on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included nontraumatic intracranial hemorrhage, dysphagia, lymphoid leukemia, anxiety disorder, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), essential primary hypertension, and insomnia.Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #152, dated 02/26/25, revealed she was cognitively intact. Resident #152 was dependent on staff for medication administration. Resident #152 required set up assistance from staff with eating, oral hygiene, toilet use, bathing, lower body dressing, putting on shoes and oral hygiene.Review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure safe resident smoking. This affected two Residents (#103, #152) out three Residents (#57, #103, #152) reviewed for smoking. The facility identified 22 Residents (#01, #07, #08, #11, #15, #25, #30, #38, #40, #43,#45,#48, #53, #55,#57, #67, #68, #72, #79, #91, #101, #112) who are smokers at the facility. The facility census was 128. Findings Include:1.Medical record review for Resident #103 revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #103 did reside on the memory care secured unit from 07/02/25 until he was moved off the memory care unit effective 10/12/25. His diagnoses include chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), emphysema, atherosclerotic heart disease, hyperlipidemia, insomnia, anxiety disorder, and vascular dementia. Resident #103 required a court appointed guardian to oversee his care. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #103, dated 04/02/26, revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-06-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure food storage areas were clean and food items were store appropriately. This had the potential to affect all residents that eat food from the kitchen. The facility identified eight (Residents #57, #89, #92, #101, #108, #122, #134, and #139) residents that did not eat food from the kitchen. The facility also failed to ensure resident refrigerators were clean. This affected Resident #36. The census was 148. Findings include: 1. During an observation on 06/02/25 at 9:03 A.M., the refrigerator in the kitchen had food storage shelves were dirty and covered in debris. The shelves had spots of a blackish green substance. Several milk cartons were in a plastic tub in the refrigerator. The milk cartons were sitting in water. No ice was in the tub. 2. During an observation 06/02/25 at 9:08 A.M., the dry storage area in the kitchen had a large plastic container containing dry cereal that was on a roll cart. The container did not have a lid. A rubber floor mat was near the cart was above the level of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-06-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, interview and policy review, the facility failed to have a Legionella prevention program. This had the potential to affect all residents of the facility. The facility also failed to to ensure staff changed gloves and washed their hands appropriately during incontinence care. This affected one (Resident #97) of three residents reviewed for incontinence. The census was 148. Findings include: 1. Review of the facility's water management documentation revealed no evidence of an implemented Legionella prevention plan. There was no documentation of any members designated to manage a Legionella prevention plan. There was no documentation of any control measures being put in place to prevent Legionella. During an interview on 06/04/25 at 3:35 P.M., Maintenance Supervisor (MS) #496 and the Administrator stated there was not an implemented Legionella prevention plan. MS #496 confirmed there was no documentation of any control measures in place to prevent Legionella. Review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-05 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a safe, functional, and homelike environment for the residents. This affected three (Residents #54, #81 and #116) of the three residents reviewed for a homelike environment. The facility census was 148. Findings include: Observation of the resident rooms on 06/04/25 from 1:10 P.M. to 1:22 P.M. with Maintenance Director #510 revealed the following: a) Resident #54's room had a damaged, brown and black discolored ceiling tile above the resident's bed. b) Resident #81's room had three damaged, brown and black discolored ceiling tiles above the resident's bed, one broken ceiling tile with a portion of the ceiling tile missing, and one entire ceiling tile, approximately three feet by four feet that was missing. c) Resident #116's room had three damaged, brown and black discolored ceiling tiles above the resident's bed. Interview on 06/04/25 at 1:22 P.M. with Maintenance Director #510, verified Residents #54, #81 and #116's room conditions.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-05 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to nail care for residents. This affected two (Residents #32 and #100) of three residents reviewed for care and services. The facility census was 148. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #32 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Alzheimer's dementia, Parkinson's disease, diabetes mellitus type II, bipolar disorder and psychotic disorder. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) significant change assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #32 had significant cognitive impairment and was always incontinent of bowel and bladder. The resident required set up assistance with eating, oral and personal hygiene, maximal assistance with bed mobility and was dependent for toileting, bathing, dressing and transfers. During an observation on 06/02/25 at 4:33 P.M., Resident #32 was sitting in her wheelchair at the overbed table dressed in clean and seasonal appropriate personal clothing. All the resident's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-05 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to followed ordered pharmacy recommendations. This affected one (Resident #135) of five residents review for unnecessary medications. The census was 148. Findings include: Review of Resident #135's medical record revealed an admission date of 11/15/24. Diagnoses listed included tremors, anemia, depression, chronic pain syndrome, thrombocytopenia, anxiety, tracheostomy, and type two diabetes mellitus. Review of a pharmacy recommendation dated 04/08/25 revealed a recommendation was made for as needed (PRN) Narcan (narcotic reversal medication) to be on hand due to Resident #135 having current orders for an opioid (Oxycodone) along with a benzodiazepine (Clonazepam). This combination increases the risk of life-threatening overdose. The pharmacy recommendation was documented as accepted with a verbal order from physician. Review of physician orders revealed Narcan PRN was not ordered for Resident #135 until 06/04/25. During an interview on 06/05/28 at 8:18 A.M. the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed PRN Narcan was not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-05 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure insulin vials were properly labeled and stored. This affected three (Residents #23, #29 and #128) of the 26 residents with medications stored in the Aspen medication cart. The facility census was 148. Findings include: During an observation of the Aspen medication cart on 06/04/25 at 8:48 A.M., Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #521 found Resident #23's Lantus insulin pen-injector was not dated when removed from the refrigerator and placed in the medication cart for administration; Resident #29's Glargine insulin pen-injector was not dated when removed from the refrigerator and placed in the medication cart for administration; and Resident #128's Tresiba pen-injector was not dated when removed from the refrigerator and placed in the medication cart for administration. During an interview at the time of the observation, LPN #521 verified none of the pens were dated when removed from stock. During an interview on 06/04/25 at 9:04 A.M, the Director of Nursing verified insulin vials and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-04 · tag F0691 — failed to provide colostomy / ostomy care — isolated
    Provide appropriate colostomy, urostomy, or ileostomy care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, resident and staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident with a colostomy was provided appropriate and adequate care. This affected one (#10) of three residents reviewed for ostomies. The census was 128. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #10 revealed a most recent admission date of 01/04/25. Diagnoses included malignant carcinoid of the stomach, severe protein calorie malnutrition, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and colostomy. Review of Resident #10's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was assessed with intact cognition, required set up for eating, and was dependent for toileting hygiene and transfers. Review of a physician order for Resident #10 dated 01/05/23 revealed colostomy care orders to clean the colostomy with soap and water, pat dry, apply skin prep around the stoma site, and apply the pouch every shift. Further review of the physician order…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-01-17 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — pattern
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, resident interviews, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the outdoor smoking area was reasonably accessible to residents and had protection from weather. This directly affected one (#110) of three residents reviewed for accommodation of needs while smoking, with the potential to affect 26 unsupervised residents who smoke. The facility identified a total of 33 residents smoking. The facility census was 134. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #110 revealed an admission date of 08/15/24. Diagnoses included acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, cardiomyopathy, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, congestive heart failure, hypotension, anemia, hyperlipidemia, and unspecified dementia, and unspecified severity with other behavioral disturbances. Review of the significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #110 was cognitively intact. Resident #110 was assessed to require setup…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 48 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-06 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interviews and policy review, the facility failed to notify a resident representative of change in health care status. This affected one (#137) of three residents reviewed for change in condition. The facility census was 35. Findings include: Medical record review for Resident #137 revealed an admission on [DATE] and a discharge on [DATE] to hospital. Resident #137 expired on [DATE] under hospice care. Diagnoses including acute diastolic (congestive) heart failure, venous insufficiency (chronic) (peripheral), vascular dementia, unspecified severity, without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, and anxiety. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #137 revealed an impaired cognition. Resident #137 required supervision for eating and total staff dependence for bed mobility, transfers and toileting. Review of the plan of care for Resident #137 revealed the resident exhibits behaviors including refusing care, showers,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-06 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure care conferences were completed as required. This affected one (#137) of three residents reviewed for care conferences. The facility census was 135. Findings included Medical record review for Resident #137 revealed an admission on [DATE] and a discharge on [DATE]. Diagnoses including acute diastolic (congestive) heart failure, venous insufficiency (chronic) (peripheral), vascular dementia, unspecified severity, without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, and anxiety. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #137 revealed an impaired cognition. Resident #137 required supervision for eating and total staff dependence for bed mobility, transfers and toileting. Review of the plan of care for Resident #137 revealed the resident exhibits behaviors including refusing care, showers, turning and repositioning, medications and wound care. Interventions include…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-06 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to follow physicians' orders for medication administration with blood pressure parameters which resulted in significant medication errors. This affected one (#37) of three residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 135. Finding include: Medical record review for Resident #37 revealed an admission on [DATE] with diagnoses including but not limited to chronic respiratory failure, hypotension, hypertension and dependence of respirator with tracheostomy status. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #37 revealed an intact cognition. Resident #37 required staff assistance for toileting, bed mobility and eating. Transfers not attempted for safety reasons. Review of the plan of care for Resident #37 revealed resident is at risk for impaired cardiac output related to diagnosis of hypertension and hypotension. Interventions include vital signs as ordered, observe for cardiac…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to implement their infection control policy during medication administration. This affected one (#114) of three residents observed for medication administration. The facility census was 135. Findings include Review of the medical record for Resident #114 revealed an admission on [DATE]. Diagnoses include Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19), infection following surgical procedure, type two diabetes mellitus, depression and hypertension. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #114 was cognitively intact. Resident #114 required staff assistance for completion of toileting, transfers, and bed mobility tasks. Review of the active physician orders for Resident #114 for the month of December 2024 revealed and order for cholecalciferol tablet 1000 units one tablet one time a day dated 11/13/24, ferrous sulfate tablet 325 milligrams (mg) one tablet daily dated 10/27/24,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-29 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — pattern
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to perform timely and adequate incontinence care and failed to ensure physician orders were followed for use of incontinence products. This affected four (#14, #43, #108 and #116) out of five residents reviewed for incontinence. The facility census was 142. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #14's medical record revealed an admission date of 12/28/22 with a diagnosis of hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting the right dominant side. Review of the Minimum Date Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #14 was cognitively intact and required substantial assistance with toileting. Review of the care plan dated 01/02/24 revealed Resident #14 required assistance from staff for incontinence care with an intervention to check routinely for incontinence and provide incontinence care as needed. 2. Review of Resident #43's medical record revealed an admission date of 05/11/23 with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-29 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to notify the physician or nurse practitioner of significant weight changes and wound treatment refusals. This affected one (#26) of three residents reviewed for nutrition and one (#108) of three residents reviewed for wounds. The facility census was 142. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #26 revealed an admission date of 07/14/21 with diagnoses of unspecified dementia with other behavioral disturbance and psychotic disorder with delusions due to known physiological condition. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #26 had severe cognitive impairment and required supervision assistance with eating. Review of the care plan dated 03/29/24 revealed Resident #26 had a potential for nutritional risk with interventions to obtain weights as ordered/indicated and notify the physician of significant weight changes. Review of Resident #26's weight record revealed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-29 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident and staff interview, medical record review, and policy review, the facility failed to provide residents with a palatable meal with appetizing temperatures. This affected two (#69 and #113) of three residents reviewed for meals. The facility census was 142. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #69 revealed an admission date of 08/02/23 with diagnoses of acquired clubfoot to the right foot, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following unspecified cerebrovascular disease affecting the right dominant side, and mild protein-calorie malnutrition. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #69 was cognitively intact and required supervision assistance with eating. Interview on 05/23/24 at 11:28 A.M. with Resident #69 revealed the food was not favorable and it was usually cold when it should be hot. 2. Review of the medical record for Resident #113 revealed an admission date of 05/01/24 with diagnoses of heart failure, and unspecified…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-29 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, resident interview, staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the physician was notified when medications were not available due to a national shortage. This affected one (Resident #65) of three residents reviewed. The census was 138. Findings include: Review of Resident #65's medical record revealed an admission date of 12/28/22. Diagnoses included type II diabetes. Review of physician orders revealed an order dated 03/01/24 for Mounjaro subcutaneous pen-injector (diabetic medication) five milligrams (mg) per 0.5 milliliter (ml) inject one time day every Friday for four weeks. Review of medication administration records revealed Mounjaro was not administered due to not being available on 03/15/24, 03/22/24, and 03/29/24. Review of progress revealed no documentation of Resident #65's physician being notified of Mounjaro not being available on 03/15/24, 03/22/24, and 03/29/24. During an interview on 04/17/24 at 3:26 P.M. the Director of Nursing (DON) and Regional Nurse Consultant (RNC) #200 confirmed Resident #65 missed Mounjaro administrations on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-29 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, resident interview, staff interview, review of facility self-reported incidents (SRI), and review of facility policy, the facility failed to prevent physical abuse. This affected one (Resident #65) of three residents reviewed. The census was 138. Findings include: Review of Resident #65's medical record revealed an admission date of 12/28/22. Diagnoses listed included depressive mood disorder, anxiety disorder, hypertension, dependence of respiratory ventilator, type two diabetes mellitus, morbid obesity, and respiratory failure. Review of a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #65 was cognitively intact. Review of a care plan initiated 02/13/23 revealed Resident #65 exhibits behavior symptoms of abusive language and physical aggression directed towards Care Team Members, also makes false accusations of staff, has manipulative behaviors, refuses care, and refuses bed baths and showers. Resident #65 has diagnoses of of mood disorder and anxiety…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-18 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record reviews, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure quarterly care conferences were completed. This affected five (#36, #76, #80, #87, and #122) out of five residents reviewed for care conferences. The facility census was 145. Findings included: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #36 revealed an admission date of 12/07/22 with medical diagnoses of chronic respiratory failure, emphysema, Guillain-Barre syndrome, dementia, and paraplegic. Review of the medical record for Resident #36 revealed a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 01/03/24, which indicated Resident #36 had moderately impaired cognition and required moderate staff assistance for bed mobility, substantial staff assistance with toilet hygiene and was dependent upon staff for bathing and transfers. Review of the medical record for Resident #36 revealed documentation to support the facility conducted a quarterly care conference on 01/09/23 and 03/12/24. The medical record did not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-18 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — pattern
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure resident's nutritional needs were met as care planned. This affected five (#9, #43, #87, #201 and #202) of eight residents reviewed for weight changes. The facility census were 145. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record review for Resident #9 revealed an admission date of 05/11/23 with diagnosis of type 2 diabetes mellitus with ketoacidosis without coma, asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, unspecified, bipolar disorder, current episode depressed, severe, with psychotic features, difficulty in walking, and major depressive disorder severe with psychotic symptoms. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 02/08/24 revealed Resident #9 was cognitively intact and was dependent with all activities of daily living (ADL's). Review of the Care Plan for Resident #9 revealed resident is at risk for complications related to hypoglycemia or hyperglycemia, hypothyroidism, fluid imbalance. Resident #9 also presents with potential for nutritional risk.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-03-18 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — pattern
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of personnel records, review of training documents and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure that nursing staff had the competencies and skill set to perform their job regarding care for residents with ventilators. This had the potential to affect four (#39, #43, #45 and #48) residents on ventilators. Facility census was 145. Findings include: Review of employee chart for Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #77 LPN revealed a hire date of 02/05/24. A pre-employment background check was completed. LPN #77's nursing license was active. Review of training record for LPN #77 revealed a Relias training record showed she completed Infection Control, Respecting Diversity in the Workplace, and Teepa Snow: PAC Skills Make a Difference. No other training documentation available. Review of employee chart for LPN #17 revealed a hire date of 12/20/23. A pre-employment background check was completed. LPN #17's nursing license was active. Review of training record for LPN #17 revealed a Relias training record showed training complete for Communication and Conflict Skills,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-18 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure preadmission screening was completed for a resident prior to admission to the facility. This affected one (#98) out of five residents reviewed for preadmission screening. The facility census was 145. Findings included: Review of the medical record for Resident #98 revealed an admission date of 10/18/23 with medical diagnoses of diabetes mellitus, anxiety, hypertension, and schizophrenia. Review of the medical record for Resident #98 revealed a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 01/29/24, which indicated Resident #98 was cognitively intact and required supervision with toilet hygiene, bed mobility, and moderate staff assistance with bathing. Review of the medical record for Resident #98 revealed a form titled, Preadmission Screening and Resident Review Results (PASRR) Notice, dated 10/20/23, which indicated Resident #98 had indications of serious mental illness and/or developmental disability and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-18 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of Hospice documentation, interviews with facility staff, Hospice provider and pharmacy representative, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure staff were able to access medications from the facility's electronic medication dispenser (Ebox). This affected one (#203) out of four reviewed for medication administration. Facility census was 145. Findings included: Review of the medical record for Resident #203 revealed an admission date of [DATE] with medical diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), diabetes mellitus, and spinal stenosis. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #203 enrolled into Hospice care on [DATE] and expired on [DATE]. Review of the medical record for Resident #203 revealed an annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated [DATE], which indicated Resident #203 had severely impaired cognition and required substantial staff assistance for eating and bathing and was dependent for toileting hygiene, bed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, staff interview and review of a facility policy, the facility failed to ensure staff used the appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) while in a residents room who was in isolation. This affected one (#43) of three residents reviewed for infection control. The facility census was 145. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #43 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, chronic respiratory failure with hypercapnia, dependence on respirator (ventilator), carrier or suspected carrier of methicillin resistant staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), and anxiety. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 12/19/23, revealed Resident #43 cognition is intact. Review of the quarterly MDS 3.0 assessment, dated 09/27/23, revealed Resident #43 required extensive assistance for bed mobility, dressing, toileting, personal hygiene, and bathing and total dependence for transfers.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-18 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to administer influenza vaccine timely. This affected one (#122) out of five residents reviewed for vaccinations. The facility census was 145. Findings included: Review of the medical record for Resident #122 revealed an admission date of 03/31/23 with medical diagnoses of diabetes mellitus, dementia, hypertension, anxiety, and depression. Review of the medical record for Resident #122 revealed a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], which indicated Resident #122 had moderately impaired cognition and required moderate staff assistance with bathing, supervision with toileting hygiene, and was independent with transfers. Review of the medical record for Resident #122 revealed a consent to administer the influenza vaccine, dated and signed on 09/13/23. Review of the medical record for Resident #122 revealed a nurse's progress note, dated 03/12/24 at 12:08 P.M. stated Resident #122 verbally consented to receive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-14 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff and physician interviews, the facility failed to notify the physician of abnormal laboratory (lab) results in a timely manner which resulted in a delay of treatment. This affected two (#84 and #162) of four residents reviewed for timely care and treatment. The facility census was 147. Findings include: 1. Review of medical record for Resident #84 revealed admission date of [DATE]. The resident was admitted with diagnoses including contracture of right ankle and foot, hemiparesis following stroke, and stroke, depression and anxiety. The resident remains in the facility. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] Resident #84 had a Brief Interview Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13 indicating intact cognition. Resident #84 required supervision for eating, maximum assistance for bed mobility bed mobility and toileting transfers were not documented. Record review revealed a positive urinalysis result was collected on [DATE], reported on [DATE] and reviewed by staff on [DATE].…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-14 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observations, resident and staff interviews the facility failed to ensure residents received timely incontinence care. This affected two (#20 and #154) of three residents reviewed for incontinence care. The facility census was 147. Findings include: 1. Review of medical record for Resident #20 revealed admission date of 01/10/21. Diagnoses include late onset Alzheimer's Disease, diabetes mellitus type two, bipolar disease and Parkinson's disease. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #20 had a Brief Interview Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12 indicating impaired cognition. Resident #20 was dependent for toileting hygiene and transfers. Documentation revealed she was frequently incontinent of bowel and bladder. 2. Review of medical record for Resident #154 revealed admission date of 01/7/23. Diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), anxiety and congestive heart failure. The annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed she…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-14 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff and physician interviews, the facility failed to timely notify the physician of abnormal laboratory (lab) results which resulted in a delay of treatment for a resident's positive Clostridioides difficile (C-diff) results. This affected one (#162) of four residents reviewed for timely care and treatment. The facility census was 147. Findings include: Review of medical record for Resident #162 revealed admission date of [DATE]. Diagnoses include stroke, hemi paresis affecting right dominant side, and depression. The was sent to the emergency room and expired on [DATE]. The significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #162 had a Brief Interview Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11 indicating impaired cognition. Resident #162 required supervision for eating, maximum assistance for bed mobility, toileting hygiene and no documentation for transfers. Review of Resident #162's provider progress note dated [DATE] revealed the resident had continued loose stools. An…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-14 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to notify the physician of abnormal laboratory (lab) results in a timely manner which resulted in a delay of treatment for a resident's urinary tract infection (UTI). This affected one (#84) of four residents reviewed for timely care and treatment. The facility census was 147. Findings include: Review of medical record for Resident #84 revealed admission date of 08/02/23. The resident was admitted with diagnoses including contracture of right ankle and foot, hemiparesis following stroke, and stroke, depression and anxiety. The resident remains in the facility. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] Resident #84 had a Brief Interview Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13 indicating intact cognition. Resident #84 required supervision for eating, maximum assistance for bed mobility bed mobility and toileting transfers were not documented. Record review revealed a positive urinalysis result was collected on 01/08/24, reported on 01/11/24 and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-11-16 · tag F0694 — pattern
    Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of the State of Ohio Board of Pharmacy Terminal Distributor Licensure of Prescriber Practices, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure medications administered Intravenously (IV) were obtained from a source with a Terminal Distributor of Dangerous Drugs (TDDD) license (which allows a business entity to purchase, possess, and/or distribute dangerous drugs at a specific location) specific to the State of Ohio. This deficiency affected four (Residents #27, #89, #85, and #30) of four reviewed for IV administration. This affected had the potential to 23 (Residents #146, #64, #38, #23, #65, #96, #70, #13, #8, #27, #89, #66, #75, #85, #30, #88, #87, #55, #61, #63, #16, #67, and #145) and 18 discharged Residents (#180, #181, #182, #183, #184, #185, #186, #187, #188, #189, #190, #191, #192, #193, #194, #195, #196, and #197) identified by the facility who received IV fluids from the unlicensed source. The census was 160. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-16 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of the State of Ohio Board of Pharmacy Terminal Distributor Licensure of Prescriber Practices, and interview the facility failed to ensure medications were obtained from a source with a Terminal Distributor of Dangerous Drugs (TDDD) license (which allows a business entity to purchase, possess, and/or distribute dangerous drugs at a specific location) specific to the State of Ohio. This deficiency affected four of four Residents (#27, #89, #85, and #30) reviewed for medications administered by a contracted ancillary provider. This affected 23 current Residents (#146, #64, #38, #23, #65, #96, #70, #13, #8, #27, #89, #66, #75, #85, #30, #88, #87, #55, #61, #63, #16, #67, and #145) and 18 discharged Residents (#180, #181, #182, #183, #184, #185, #186, #187, #188, #189, #190, #191, #192, #193, #194, #195, #196, and #197). The census was 160. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #27 revealed an admission date of 04/06/23. Diagnoses included chronic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-11-16 · tag F0837 — pattern
    Establish a governing body that is legally responsible for establishing and implementing policies for managing and operating the facility and appoints a properly licensed administrator responsible for managing the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of the State of Ohio Board of Pharmacy Terminal Distributor Licensure of Prescriber Practices, review of facility policy, and interview the facility failed to ensure a contracted entity had appropriate State of Ohio required credentials for provision of services for residents. This deficiency affected four of four Residents (#27, #89, #85, and #30) reviewed for medications administered by a contracted ancillary provider. This affected 23 current Residents (#146, #64, #38, #23, #65, #96, #70, #13, #8, #27, #89, #66, #75, #85, #30, #88, #87, #55, #61, #63, #16, #67, and #145) and 18 discharged Residents (#180, #181, #182, #183, #184, #185, #186, #187, #188, #189, #190, #191, #192, #193, #194, #195, #196, and #197). The census was 160. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #27 revealed an admission date of 04/06/23. Diagnoses included chronic respiratory failure with hypercapnia, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), major depressive disorder,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-16 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, staff interviews, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure medication administration was signed off by appropriate staff. This affected two (Residents #27 and #85) of four reviewed for Intravenous (IV) administration of medications. The census was 160. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #27 revealed an admission date 04/06/23. Diagnoses included chronic respiratory failure with hypercapnia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), major depressive disorder, morbid obesity, malignant neoplasm, Diabetes Mellitus Type 2 (DM2), dependence of respirator, obstructive sleep apnea, and colostomy status. Review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) for July 2023 revealed facility Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #313 signed off an IV medication on 07/06/23. The medication was to have been infused by a contracted Registered Nurse (RN) from the ancillary provider. Interview on 11/15/23 at 4:02 P.M. with the Director of Nursing (DON) verified she spoke with LPN #313 on 11/15/23 at 10:00 A.M. by phone and the LPN…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, medical record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure care planned fall interventions were in place to prevent falls for residents at risk for falls. This affected two (#72 and #81) of three residents reviewed for falls. The census was 177. Findings included: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #72 revealed an admission date of 01/28/02, with diagnoses including: peripheral vascular disease, diabetes, non-Alzheimer's dementia, depression, and Schizophrenia. Review of care plan dated and revised on 03/05/21 revealed Resident #72 was at risk for injuries/falls related to cataract, glaucoma, legal blindness, diabetes, macular degeneration, dementia, displacement of lumbar disc, peripheral vascular disease, schizophrenia, and medication use. Intervention of the plan revealed on 08/04/23 was to place an elevated perimeter mattress. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #72 was moderately cognitively impaired. His…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-24 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, medical record review, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was provided incontinence care in a timely manner. This affected one (#72) of three residents reviewed for timeliness incontinence care. The census was 177. Findings included: Review of the medical record for Resident #72 revealed an admission date of 01/28/02, diagnoses including: peripheral vascular disease, diabetes, non-Alzheimer's dementia, depression, and Schizophrenia. Review of care plan dated 03/15/23 for Resident #72 revealed he had episodes of incontinence of bladder and bowels. Interventions were to check routinely for incontinence and provide incontinence care as needed. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed he was moderately cognitively impaired. His functional status was extensive assistance for bed mobility, transfers, and toilet use. He was limited assistance or eating. He was always incontinent for urinary and frequently incontinent…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-03-29 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, observation and interview, the facility failed to store, serve, and prepare food in a sanitary manner and monitor refrigerator and dishwasher temperatures. This had the potential to affect 167 residents who received food from the kitchen. The facility census was 173. Findings include: Observation on 03/20/23 at 9:18 A.M. revealed following: 1. There was a buildup of food debris on the ovens and stoves and on the floor surrounding the stoves. 2. There were undated and unlabeled foods in the dry storage area including pasta and bread. 3. There were multiple foods in the walk-in refrigerator with undecipherable black markings. A container of rice was unlabeled and dated 03/14/23. 4. The ice machine had the ice scoop laying with the contact surface on top of the ice machine. 5. In the food preparation area, there were two coats stored under the counter of the food preparation table. During interview on 03/20/23 at 9:18 A.M., Account Manager, (AC) #208 stated he needed to purchase food stickers so the markings did not rub off. He stated the food prep area should…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-03-29 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain a clean and safe homelike environment in the main dining room and in resident rooms. This affected six (Residents # 21, #151, #10, #131 #163 and #145) residents. This had the potential to affect all residents. The facility census was 173. Findings include: 1. During observation on 03/20/23 at 10:56 A.M., Resident #145 was sitting on his bed. The bed footboard was cracked for the length of 18 inches from the right side of the footboard running towards the left side. There was a 4 inch by 2-inch hole along the crack line with jagged edges of foot board material exposed. The edges were rough. There was heavy duty tape residue near the edges of the hole. There was a nightstand with no lower door with hinges exposed. There was a six by one inch hole in the wall near the bathroom. During interview on 03/20/23 at 10:56 A.M., Resident #145's family member revealed the broken and exposed hole in the bed footboard had been present since the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-03-29 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, observation and interview, the facility failed to provide food portions as planned by a Registered Dietitian. This affected four (Residents #115, #6, #7 and #172) who received a puree diet, and one (Resident #177) of 11 residents reviewed for fluid restrictions. 167 residents received food from the kitchen. The census was 173. Findings include: Record review revealed Residents #115, #6, #7 and #172 were on pureed diets. Review of breakfast menu spreadsheet for 03/21/23 revealed the puree diet meal consisted of one #16 (two ounce) portion of pureed eggs and cheese, #16 portion of pureed meat and a #16 scoop of pureed bread. During observation on 03/21/23 at 8:04 A.M. there were no pureed eggs prepared and no resident on a puree diet received the pureed scrambled eggs with cheese. There was no substitution for the pureed scrambled eggs. During interview on 03/21/23 at 8:04 A.M., Account Manager #208 revealed no resident who received a pureed diet received a pureed scrambled egg with cheese because he was told the resident could choke on it. He stated the pureed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-29 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review and policy review, the facility failed ensure residents had written authorizations for the facility to manage their personal funds. This affected two (Residents #45 and #81) of five residents reviewed for personal funds. 173 residents had personal funds accounts. The facility census was 173. Findings include: 1. Record review revealed Resident #45 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident #45's written authorization for resident funds revealed the authorization that was signed on 03/21/23. During an interview on 03/21/23, Assistant Business Office Manager (ABOM) #169 verified Resident #45 did not have an authorization for resident funds prior to 03/21/23 and the facility had been managing the resident's personal funds. 2. Record review revealed Resident #81 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident #81's written authorization for resident funds revealed Resident #81 did not have a signed resident funds authorization. During an interview on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-29 · tag F0569 — isolated
    Notify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify residents that the amount of funds in their accounts was 200 dollars less than the social security income resource limit and that the residents may lose eligibility for Medicaid or social security income. This affected two (Residents #45 and #81) of five residents reviewed for personal funds. The facility census was 173. Findings include: 1. Record review revealed Resident #45 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident #45's quarterly statement from 07/01/22 to 09/30/22 revealed Resident #45 had an ending balance of $3036.29. Review of Resident #45's quarterly statement from 10/01/22 to 12/30/22 revealed Resident #45 had an ending balance of $1758.37. There was no evidence Resident #45 was given notice their account balance 200 dollars less than the social security income resource limit and Resident #45 may lose eligibility for Medicaid or social security income. 2. Record review revealed Resident #81 was admitted [DATE]. Review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-29 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a potential incident of misappropriation of resident property was reported to the State Agency (SA). This affected one (Resident#145) of two residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 173. Findings include: Record review revealed Resident #145 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 02/14/23, revealed the resident had severely impaired cognition. Review of nursing notes dated 02/15/23 at 1:49 P.M. revealed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #29 documented Resident #145's family member was visiting and noticed the resident's wedding ring was missing. LPN #29 noted the staff would be on the lookout for the ring and LPN Unit Manager #64 was notified of the missing wedding ring. During interview on 03/22/23 at 11:43 A.M., the Administrator revealed no knowledge of Resident #145's missing wedding ring. During interview on 03/20/23 at 2:37 P.M. 10:56 A.M. with Resident #145…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-29 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a potential incident of misappropriation of resident property was thoroughly investigated. This affected one (Resident#145) of two residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 173. Findings include: Record review revealed Resident #145 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 02/14/23, revealed the resident had severely impaired cognition. Review of nursing notes dated 02/15/23 at 1:49 P.M. revealed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #29 documented Resident #145's family member was visiting and noticed the resident's wedding ring was missing. LPN #29 noted the staff would be on the lookout for the ring and LPN Unit Manager #64 was notified of the missing wedding ring. During interview on 03/22/23 at 11:43 A.M., the Administrator revealed no knowledge of Resident #145's missing wedding ring. During interview on 03/20/23 at 2:37 P.M. 10:56 A.M. with Resident #145 family…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-29 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to complete a preadmission screening resident review (PASARR) on a newly admitted residents that had an expired hospital exemption and a history of mental illness. This affected one (Resident #136) of five residents reviewed for preadmission screening resident review (PASARR). The facility census was 173. Findings include: 1. Record review revealed Resident #136 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, Parkinson's disease, type two diabetes mellitus with hyperglycemia, bipolar disorder, fusion of spine and gastro esophageal reflux disease without esophagitis. Review of Resident #136's hospital exemption from preadmission screening notification dated [DATE] revealed the nursing facility accepts responsibility for electronically initiating a resident review if required prior to the 30th day following the admission from the hospital. Review of Resident #136's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-29 · tag F0661 — isolated
    Ensure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a discharge summary was completed and provided to the resident upon a resident's discharge home. This affected one (Resident #175) of three residents reviewed for discharges. The facility census was 173. Findings include: Record review revealed Resident #175 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with and discharged from the facility 02/01/23. Review of Resident #175's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident's cognition was not assessed and Resident #175 required extensive assistance with bed mobility, personal hygiene, transfers, dressing, and toileting. Resident #175 required limited assistance with eating. Review of Resident #175's progress notes from 01/09/23 to 02/01/23 revealed no documentation regarding Resident #175's discharge plans or discharge. Resident #175's progress notes did not list a discharge time or location. Review of Resident #175's physician order dated 01/30/23 revealed Resident #175…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-29 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. Record review revealed Resident #63 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses for Resident #63 include Alzheimer's disease, osteoporosis, and cataracts. Review of the MDS comprehensive assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had impaired cognition and required extensive assistance of one staff for personal hygiene. During observation on 03/23/23 a 9:05 A.M., Resident #63 had heavy hair growth above her upper lip. During interview at the time of the observation, Resident #63 stated she did not like the hair above her lip had been waiting two days for the hair to be removed. During interview on 03/23/23 at 9:09 A.M., STNA #250 verified Resident #63 had hair growth above her upper lip and the STNA assignment included removal of facial hair. Review of the policy titled Activities of Daily Living, dated October 2022, revealed a resident who could not carry out activities of daily living would receive necessary services to maintain grooming and personal hygiene. Based on record review, obseration and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-29 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure activities were provided to residents consistent with their interests. This affected two (Residents #120 and #13) of four residents reviewed for activities. The census was 180. Findings included: Medical record review for Resident #120 revealed an admission date of 09/12/21. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 09/19/22, revealed it was somewhat important to listen to music, be around animals, to do her favorite activities, and to go outside for fresh air. Review of the care plan dated 09/19/22 revealed the resident preferred to be involved in individual, leisure and one on one based activities. The goal was the resident would participate in one on one activities three times per week. Review of activity log from 02/22/23 to 03/22/23 revealed there was no documentation any one on one activity was provided to Resident #120. During observations on 03/20/23 at 1:40 P.M., 03/21/23 at 3:30 P.M., 03/22/23 at 1:45…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-29 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolated
    Provide appropriate foot care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure podiatry services were provided as ordered. This affected one (Resident #10) of 24 sampled residents. The census was 173. Findings include: Record review revealed Resident #10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including diabetes. Record review revealed a physician order dated 02/19/18 for podiatry to be consulted and for podiatry to follow the resident. Record review revealed no documentation of any podiatry follow up. The podiatrist had been to the facility 04/22/22 and 11/22/22, but Resident #10 was not seen. During observation on 03/22/23 at 10:34 AM, Resident #10's left foot was very dry with crusty and flaky skin falling off. Resident #10 had long, black overgrown toenails on both feet. During interview on 03/22/23 at 10:38 AM, Social Services Director (SSD) #110 stated the podiatrist visits the facility quarterly. The next visit is scheduled April 2023. During interview on 03/24/23 at 12:22 P.M., Resident #10 stated no…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-29 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview and policy review, the facility failed to obtain daily and weekly weights upon admission and as ordered. This affected three (Residents #110, #145 and #177) of four residents reviewed for nutrition. The facility census was 173. 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #110 revealed an admission date of 11/21/22. Diagnoses included type 2 diabetes mellitus, cerebral infarction, legal blindness, generalized anxiety disorder, weakness, COVID-19, hyperlipidemia, and depression. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #110, dated 01/23/23, revealed the resident had an impaired cognition. Resident #110 required extensive assistance with hygiene, toileting, dressing, locomotion on/off unit, and walking in room/corridor. The resident required limited assistance from staff for bed mobility, transfers, and eating. No swallowing concerns were noted in the assessment. Resident #110 was on a therapeutic diet according to the assessment. The assessment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-29 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a dental appointment was scheduled for tooth extractions. This affected one (Resident #13) of two residents reviewed for dental services. Findings include: Record review revealed Resident #13 was admitted on [DATE]. Medical diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 12/31/22, revealed Resident #13 was she was cognitively intact. Review of the dental consultation dated 06/09/22 revealed Resident #13 only wanted to see an oral surgeon for tooth extractions. Review of the dental consultation dated 01/05/23 revealed an oral surgeon referral was recorded on the paperwork from the dentist. Review of progress notes from 01/05/23 to present revealed there were no referrals made to the oral surgeon for tooth extractions. During interview on 03/20/23 at 10:53 A.M., Resident #13 stated she had seen the dentist twice since she was in the facility. She wanted to go to an oral…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-29 · tag F0825 — isolated
    Provide or get specialized rehabilitative services as required for a resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, interview and policy review, the d facility policy the facility failed to accurately document a resident's weight bearing status and accurately assess a resident's need for therapy services. This affected one (Resident #15) of two residents reviewed for therapy services. The facility census was 173. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #15 revealed an admission date of 02/04/23. Diagnoses included fracture of the lower end of the right femur, type 2 diabetes mellitus, bipolar disorder, congestive heart failure, major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, chronic kidney disease, and hypertension. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 02/11/23, revealed the resident had impaired cognition. The resident required extensive assistance for all activities of daily living except eating, which required limited assistance. Review of the plan of care for Resident #15, dated 02/04/23, revealed the resident received rehabilitation/special services. Interventions included offering pain medications as ordered, physical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-07-11 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview and review of medication storage policy, the facility failed to properly label drugs and biologicals used in the facility. One vial of Tuberculin purified protein derivative (PPD) was opened and undated. This had the potential to affect all residents. There were also four inhalers stored in medication carts that were opened and undated. This directly affected four (#39, #80, #97, and #115) of four residents medications that were observed. Facility census was 171. Findings include: 1. Observation of medication storage refrigerator inside the nursing supervisors office on 07/09/19 at 9:00 A.M. revealed an opened and undated five milliliter (ml) vial of Tuberculin PPD solution. Interview with Registered Nurse (RN) #213 on 07/09/19 at 9:01 A.M. verified the 5 ml vial of PPD used for tuberculin skin tests was opened and undated. RN #213 stated the vial of PPD should have been dated when it was opened. Review of facility policy titled Recommended Medication Storageand dated 01/09/18 revealed the vial of PPD should be dated when…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-07-11 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on closed medical record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to provide the required Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) when Medicare Part A residents were discharged from the facility to home with skilled days remaining. This affected two (#327 and #328) of four residents reviewed for beneficiary protection notification. The facility census was 171. Findings include: 1. Review of the closed medical record for Resident #327 revealed a progress note dated 02/21/19 noting the Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) met and felt that Resident #327 was able to return home. Review of the facility completed Beneficiary Notice form revealed Resident #327 received Medicare Part A services and was discharged home on [DATE] with skilled days remaining. Further review of the information was silent of verification that the resident was provided the required NOMNC forms prior to discharge 2. Review of the close medical record for Resident #328 revealed a progress note dated 04/25/19 from Social Services noting…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-07-11 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview and review of facility policy, the facility failed to implement their abuse policy in regards to an allegation of sexual abuse. This affected two (#16 and #35) of 34 resident's records reviewed during the initial pool stage. Facility census was 171. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #16 revealed an admission date of 12/25/18. Diagnoses included altered mental status, cerebral infarction, major depressive disorder, Parkinson's disease and dementia without behavioral disturbances. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had impaired cognition. Resident #16 had no behaviors, did not reject care, did not wander and required extensive assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs). 2. Review of the medical record for Resident #35 revealed an admission date of 06/26/16. Diagnoses included dementia without behavioral disturbances, muscle weakness, major depressive disorder, schizophrenia and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-07-11 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview and review of facility policy, the facility failed to report an allegation of sexual abuse to the Ohio Department of Health. This affected two (#16 and #35) of 34 resident's records reviewed during the initial pool stage. Facility census was 171. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #16 revealed an admission date of 12/25/18. Diagnoses included altered mental status, cerebral infarction, major depressive disorder, Parkinson's disease and dementia without behavioral disturbances. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had impaired cognition. Resident #16 had no behaviors, did not reject care, did not wander and required extensive assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs). 2. Review of the medical record for Resident #35 revealed an admission date of 06/26/16. Diagnoses included dementia without behavioral disturbances, muscle weakness, major depressive disorder, schizophrenia and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-07-11 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview and review of facility policy, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate an allegation of sexual abuse. This affected two (#16 and #35) of 34 resident's records reviewed during the initial pool stage. Facility census was 171. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #16 revealed an admission date of 12/25/18. Diagnoses included altered mental status, cerebral infarction, major depressive disorder, Parkinson's disease and dementia without behavioral disturbances. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had impaired cognition. Resident #16 had no behaviors, did not reject care, did not wander and required extensive assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs). 2. Review of the medical record for Resident #35 revealed an admission date of 06/26/16. Diagnoses included dementia without behavioral disturbances, muscle weakness, major depressive disorder, schizophrenia and anxiety. Review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-07-11 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, resident and staff interviews, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to provide residents assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) this affected two Residents (#75 and #173) of four reviewed for dignity and/or ADLs. The facility census was 171. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #173 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including congestive heart failure, major depressive disorder, type two diabetes, cellulitis, shortness of breath, anxiety disorder, polyosteoarthritis, obesity, chronic pain, and nontoxic goiter. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the resident was cognitively intact with no noted behaviors. Review of Section G- functional status revealed the resident required extensive two-person assistance with bed mobility, toileting, transfer, extensive one-person assistance with locomotion, dressing, personal hygiene, and supervision with eating. Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-07-11 · tag F0685 — isolated
    Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, resident and staff interview, the facility failed to timely obtain hearing services for residents. This affected one (#80) of one resident reviewed for hearing services. The census was 171. Finding include: Review of Resident #80's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of cerebral infarction, dementia, psychosis, ataxia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hemiplegia, anxiety, and hypertension. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated on 05/05/19 revealed the resident had moderately impaired cognition, no hallucinations but there were verbal behaviors expressed. The resident was extensive assistance with activities of daily living and incontinent of bowels and bladder. Review of the plan of care dated 07/12/15, revealed Resident #80 was hard of hearing. An intervention included to arrange consult with audiologist as desired by family/resident and assist with care and insertion of head phones as needed, check…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$108,164 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

  • $108,164 — penalty dated 2024-02-14
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-04-16 for 64 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to MAJESTIC CARE — 22 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 52.5-0.5 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.1-1.1 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 51.7-0.7 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.5+0.5 vs chain
The other 21 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.5★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
RB SNF OPERATIONS HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 10/01/2020
PRUITT, PAULIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/01/2023
6898 HAMILTON MIDDLETOWN ROAD SNF REALTY LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2020
MAJESTIC MANAGEMENT LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/11/2025
CHAMBERLAIN, MARGARETIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 09/11/2023
MARX, DAVIDIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2020
REWA, ANGELAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/23/2023
RUSSELL, ROBERTIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/08/2024
SHATROV, ANZHELIKAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/02/2024
WOLFE, ERICIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 09/11/2023
WYLIE, AMYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
RB SNF REAL ESTATE HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2020

CMS files one row per role, so the 23 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$22.1M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+11.5%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$3.5M
Related-party expense18% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 82%Medicare 4%Other / private 14%

About 82% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $3.5M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 18% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$315per resident / day
operating cost
$9,570per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$356per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Ohio
$9,186/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,389/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,103/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 365209. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-06-05, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next