Majestic Care of Battle Creek
200 E Roosevelt, Battle Creek, MI 49037 · For profit - Corporation · 65 certified beds · (269) 965-3327 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home’s record is mixed — some reassuring signs, some worth asking about.
- a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (38) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (62%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 3 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 2 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 8.8% | 10.8% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 5.6% | 5.4% | 5.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.7% | 0.8% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.6% | 1.5% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 10.7% | 4.3% | 6.5% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 1.1% | 0.1% | 0.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.6% | 3.0% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 9.7% | 12.0% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 29.5% | 19.4% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 95.3% | 95.0% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 5.7% | 5.1% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 25.6% | 20.0% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 8.7% | 14.8% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.6% | 1.1% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 50.9% | 79.5% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 31.5% | 24.0% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 0.0% | 11.7% | 12.0% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.14 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 10% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 5% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 8.7% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.98 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 65 beds and averages 52.3 residents a day — about 80% occupied, or roughly 13 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.00 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.553 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.74 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.83 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.07 on weekdays — 8% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.60 to 0.43 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 62% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
38 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 28 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · E2026-01-16 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — patternHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Advance Directives were accurately completed for four (R8, R9, R39 and R52) of four reviewed. Findings include:Resident #8 (R8) Review of the medical record revealed R8 was admitted to the facility [DATE] with diagnoses that included chronic respiratory failure, diabetes mellitus, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), morbid (severe) obesity, tracheostomy, gastro-esophageal reflux, dependence on supplemental oxygen, depression, heart failure, hypertension, bipolar disorder, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), visual blindness bilaterally, schizophrenia, celiac disease (an autoimmune disorder where gluten damages the small intestine), and atrial fibrillation. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of [DATE], revealed R8 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 15 (cognitively intact) out of 15. During observation and interview on [DATE] at 12:32 p.m. R8 was observed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-16 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain consent for psychotropic medication use for one (R23) of five reviewed. Findings include: Review of the medical record reflected R23 admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included fracture of lower end of right femur and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 12/22/25, reflected R23 scored 13 out of 15 (cognitively intact) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS-a cognitive screening tool) and was coded as receiving antianxiety medication. On 01/16/2026 at 9:14 AM, R23 was observed seated in a wheelchair, in their room, combing their hair. A Physician's Order, dated 12/16/25, reflected R23 was to receive 15 milligrams (mg) of buspirone (antianxiety medication) three times daily for anxiety. The medical record did not reflect a consent for buspirone. In an interview on 01/15/2026 at 11:13 AM, Director of Nursing (DON) B…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-16 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolatedPrevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to 1) document clinical rationale for duplicate psychotropic medication therapy for one (R23) of five reviewed; and 2) ensure appropriate monitoring of antipsychotic medication use for one (R41) of five reviewed.Findings include:R23: Review of the medical record reflected R23 admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included fracture of lower end of right femur and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 12/22/25, reflected R23 scored 13 out of 15 (cognitively intact) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS-a cognitive screening tool) and was coded as receiving antidepressant medication. On 01/16/2026 at 9:14 AM, R23 was observed seated in a wheelchair, in their room, combing their hair. A Physician's Order, dated 12/16/25, reflected R23 was prescribed 75 milligrams (mg) of Amitriptyline Hydrochloride (HCl) (antidepressant medication)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-16 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate less than 5% when 2 of 25 medications were not administered in accordance with physician's orders for 1 (R40) of 4, resulting in a medication error rate of 8%.Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed R40 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of type 2 diabetes. Review of the Physician's Order dated 1/2/26 revealed an order for insulin aspart (rapid acting insulin) FlexPen 100 units/mL (milliliter) inject 10 units subcutaneously three times daily before meals for diabetes mellitus. Review of the Physician's Order dated 1/2/26 revealed an order for Metformin HCl 500 milligrams (mg) give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day for diabetes. During an observation on 01/15/2026 at 8:24 AM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) G removed R40's insulin aspart FlexPen from the medication cart, dialed the pen to 5 units and pushed the injection button. When asked to describe the process, LPN G…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-16 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolatedProvide or obtain dental services for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide timely routine and emergency dental services for two (R4 and R6) of four reviewed for dental services. Findings include:Resident #6On 1/14/26 at 1:05 pm, R6 was observed asleep, sitting up in a wheelchair. R6 did not arouse when greeted. Review of the clinical record revealed R6 was admitted into the facility on 2/25/25 with diagnoses that included: vascular dementia, severe, with psychotic disturbance, major depressive disorder, and cerebral infarction (stroke). According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], R6 scored 4/15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status exam (which indicated severely impaired cognition). In a telephone interview on 1/14/26 at 2:36 pm, with Family Member (FM) R, it was reported that R6 had not been seen for dental services in approximately 2 years and had not had a pair of dentures in a year and a half. A review of R6's physician orders revealed three orders stating May be seen by…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-16 · tag F0847 — isolatedInform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a Binding Arbitration Agreement was explained to the resident in a form and manner they understood for one (R23) of three reviewed.Findings include:Review of the medical record revealed R23 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included anxiety and depression. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 12/22/25 revealed R23 scored 13 out of 15 (cognitively intact) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS-a cognitive screening tool). R23 was their own decision maker. R23 signed the Arbitration Agreement on 12/19/25 and Director of Marketing and Admissions (DOMA) F signed as the authorized facility representative. On 01/16/2026 at 9:26 AM, R23 was observed sitting in a wheelchair in their room. R23 reported they did not recall discussing or signing an Arbitration Agreement. When explained that the Arbitration Agreement included giving up their right to litigation in a court…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff utilized appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) for two residents (R6 and R31) of two reviewed for Transmission-Based Precautions.Findings include: R6:Review of the medical record revealed R6 was admitted into the facility on 2/25/25 with diagnoses that included: vascular dementia, severe, with psychotic disturbance, major depressive disorder, and cerebral infarction (stroke). According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], R6 scored 4/15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status exam (which indicated severely impaired cognition). A review of R6's progress notes revealed, on 1/8/26 Resident tested positive for covid today. On 1/14/26 at approximately 12pm, a droplet precaution sign was observed on the exterior of R6's room door. Social services director (SSD) E was observed entering R6's room with only a surgical mask on and without performing any hand hygiene. In an interview on 1/16/26 at 2:37 pm,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-22 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake number 2610947.Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure for two out of four residents (Residents #1 and 3) care plans were revised as care needs changed. Resident #1 (R1):Per the facility face sheet R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included a stage III pressure ulcer of the sacrum (butt bone).Review of a Skin Condition Evaluation form dated 6/9/2025, revealed R1 had a wound to the right inner thigh documented to be unstageable, a pressure wound to the gluteal fold (the crease in the buttocks) that was documented at a stage II, another wound on the right gluteal fold that was a stage II, a pressure ulcer to the left great toe, and a pressure ulcer to the left heel. Review of a Skin Condition Evaluation dated 6/16/2025, revealed R1 had a sacral pressure ulcer that measured 12 X 9 X 0.3 cm (centimeters) and was a stage III. The assessment did not mention the two gluteal fold stage II pressure ulcers (in this area two…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-06 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake MI00148919. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the provider of a change in condition for one (Resident #1) of two reviewed. Findings include: Review of the medical record reflected Resident #1 (R1) admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included unspecified severe protein-calorie malnutrition, degenerative disease of the nervous system and quadriplegia. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 12/1/24, reflected R1 was rarely/never understood and received nutrition via feeding tube. On 1/3/25 at 2:20 PM, R1 was observed lying in bed, awake. R1 did not verbally respond when spoke to. A bottle of Jevity 1.5 calorie tube feeding formula was infusing at a rate of 55 milliliters (mL) per hour. A bag of water was observed hanging, set for a flush rate of 50 mL every eight hours. On 1/6/25 at 8:59 AM, R1 was observed lying in bed, with their eyes closed. A bottle of Jevity 1.5 calorie…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-10-30 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespreadEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide hot liquids at a palatable temperature to 5 of 8 residents in a group interview and one of two residents (R30) surveyed. This deficient practice has the potential to result in decreased hydration consumption and potential for decreased satisfaction of living. On 10/28/24 at 1:00 pm during the confidential group meeting , 5 of 8 group participants reported being frustrated with the temperatures of beverages, stating coffee and tea are always cold and water for hot cocoa was always too cold resulting in the cocoa packet not getting dissolved and left clumpy. Resident #30 Review of the clinical record including the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] Resident # 30 (R30) was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included, major depression, hemipelaigia and hemiparesis. Review of the MDS reflected R30 scored 15 out of 15 (cognitively intact) on the Brief Interview Mental Status (BIMS), further review of the MDS reveled…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 28 citations
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-10-30 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prepare food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. This deficient practice has the potential to result in food borne illness among all residents that consume food in the kitchen. Findings include: During an initial tour of the kitchen, at 9:12 AM on 10/27/24, observation of the two door Delfield refrigeration unit found the following items: a container of hot dogs dated 10/24 to 11/7, an open container of sliced smoked ham with no date, a saran wrapped chunk of ham with no date, an open container of strawberry sauce dated 10/13 to 10/19, a ziplock bag of bratwurst dated 10/18 to 11/18, and a bag of shredded lettuce dated 10/26 to 11/1 with a manufacture best by date of 10/28/24. An interview with [NAME] F, at 9:15 AM on 10/27/24, asking how many days are usually given to items like brats and hot dogs, [NAME] F stated it should be seven days, I would throw them away. According to the 2017 FDA Food Code section 3-501.17 Ready-to-Eat, Time/Temperature Control for Safety Food, Date…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-10-30 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — patternProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This Citation Pertains to Intake #M00145852 Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide consistent and accurate activity calendars and failed to provide meaningful, diverse and engaging activity programs for one resident (#30) of three residents reviewed and 6 of 8 residents from confidential group meeting. Resident #30 Review of the clinical record including the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] Resident # 30 (R30) was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included, major depression, hemipelaigia and hemiparesis. Review of the MDS reflected R30 scored 15 out of 15 (cognitively intact) on the Brief Interview Mental Status (BIMS), further review of the MDS reveled R30 had clear speech and adequate hearing. On 10/27/24 at 11:23 AM, during a bedside interview R30 was observed in bed and reported he was bored as the facility offers little to no activities, R30 reported there had been no Activity Director or Activity Aid in a month and they were employed at the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to have an active and ongoing plan for reducing the risk of Legionella and other opportunistic pathogens of premise plumbing and failed to protect clean and sanitary supplies from possible wastewater contamination. This deficient practice has the potential for the growth and transmission of Legionella in the circulating water of the building and the spread of Legionella infections, and potential contamination of clean supplies, affecting all residents. Findings include: During a tour of the facility, at 10:10 AM on 10/27/24, an observation of the small shower room found a shower fixture on the wall with no direct spigot or faucet found to dispense the water. Upon momentarily turning on the handle, water could be heard coming out of a fixture in the wall. During an interview with Maintenance Director (MD) H,at 11:08 AM on 10/27/24, it was found that he flushes all empty rooms on a weekly basis. During a tour of the nourishment room behind the nurse's station, at 11:10 AM on 10/27/24, it was observed that two…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-30 · tag F0622 — isolatedNot transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure required transfer and discharge documentation was completed for one (Resident #20) of two residents reviewed for discharge. Resulting in the potential for ineffective or mismanaged continued care, as care plan goals were omitted from the transfer paperwork. Findings include: Resident #20 (R20) Review of the medical record reflected R20 was an initial admission to the facility on [DATE] with a readmission on [DATE]. Diagnoses of Parkinsons Disease, Diabetes Mellitus, Dementia, Cardiac Arrhythmias, Anxiety, Chronic Pain and weakness. The most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 09/12/2024, revealed R20 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of 15 (cognitively intact) out of 15. Under section G0100, Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Assistance reveals R20 requires minimal assistance with personal care. During an interview on 10/27/24 at 12:27 PM, R20 stated the last time she was in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-30 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide a written copy to one (Residents #20) of two residents of the reason for transfer/discharge to the hospital in a language that was understandable, resulting in potential for lack of understanding and knowledge. Findings Include: Resident #20 (R20) Review of the medical record reflected R20 was an initial admission to the facility on [DATE] with a readmission on [DATE]. Diagnoses of Parkinsons Disease, Diabetes Mellitus, Dementia, Cardiac Arrhythmias, Anxiety, Chronic Pain and weakness. The most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 09/12/2024, revealed R20 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of 15 (cognitively intact) out of 15. Under section G0100, Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Assistance reveals R20 requires minimal assistance with personal care. During an interview on 10/27/24 at 12:27 PM, R20 stated the last time she was in the hospital, she was admitted with a urinary tract…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-30 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide a written copy to one (Resident #20) of two residents reviewed for bed hold notification in a language that was understandable, resulting in potential for lack of understanding and knowledge for and what the bed hold policy entailed. Findings include: Resident #20 (R20) Review of the medical record reflected R20 was an initial admission to the facility on [DATE] with a readmission on [DATE]. Diagnoses of Parkinsons Disease, Diabetes Mellitus, Dementia, Cardiac Arrhythmias, Anxiety, Chronic Pain and weakness. The most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 09/12/2024, revealed R20 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of 15 (cognitively intact) out of 15. Under section G0100, Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Assistance reveals R20 requires minimal assistance with personal care. During an interview on 10/27/24 at 12:27 PM, R20 stated the last time she was in the hospital, she was admitted…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-30 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Preadmission Screening (PAS)/ Annual Resident Review (ARR) form for Mental Illness (MI)/ Intellectual Disability (ID)/ Related Conditions Identification (DCH-3877) document was timely completed and sent to the local state agency for an evaluation for a Level II determination for one residents (R18) of one residents reviewed for PASARRs. Findings include: Findings include: On 10/28/24 at 10:30 AM R18 was observed sitting in a wheelchair in the hallway; greeting staff and residents by name as they came by. Review of the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed R18 had an original admission date of 3/8/23. R18 had the following diagnoses: Quadriplegia (a paralysis that affects all limbs), Schizoaffective Disorder; Bipolar Type (a psychotic condition which causes fluctuation of mood), Major Depressive Disorder, Anxiety Disorder, and Dementia (a chronic condition that causes a decline in mental abilities). The Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 9/5/24 revealed R18 scored 15 out of 15…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-30 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure baseline care plans were developed within 48 hours of admission for one of 13 residents (Resident #41) resulting in the potential for unmet care needs. Findings included: Per the facility R41 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included dyskinesia (disorder of the esophagus) and dysphasia (difficulty in swallowing). Record review of R41's nutrition care plan revealed that it wasn't until 10/1/2024, six days after R41 was admitted , that a plan of care was put into place. R41's nutritional care plan revealed, presents with potential for nutritional risk related to acute metabolic encephalopathy (brain disease), UTI (urinary tract infection) chronic dysphasia. DX: MDD (diagnosis major depression disorder), anxiety, seizures, CKD (kidney disease) HLD increase lipids), chronic gastritis, vit D deficiency, hypothyroidism, sarcopenia (loss of muscle/strength). Mechanically altered diet affecting her oral intake. Date Initiated:…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-30 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to revise timely, individualized care plans for one (Resident #25) of 13 residents reviewed for care planning, resulting in the potential for inadequate/inappropriate care and this resident not maintaining or achieving their highest practical physical well-being. Resident #25 (R25) Review of the medical record reflected R25 was an initial admission to the facility on [DATE] with a readmission on [DATE]. Diagnoses of Diabetes Mellitus with foot ulcer, restless leg syndrome, non-pressure related ulcers of the right foot with necrosis, Peripheral Vascular Disease and Chronic Kidney Disease. The most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 10/30/2024, revealed R25 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of 15 (cognitively intact) out of 15. Under section G0100, Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Assistance reveals R25 requires stand by assistance to independent with personal care. During an interview on 10/27/24 at 01:27…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-30 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to have an emergency tracheostomy readily available for 1 (R9) of 1 resident reviewed for tracheostomy care, resulting in the potential for a delay in needed action in the event of an emergency tracheostomy dislodgement. Findings include: On 10/27/24 at 10:42 AM R9 was observed resting in bed with a relaxed facial expression and breathing quietly through a tracheostomy which appeared intact and clean. Review of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed R9 had an original admission date of 1/11/23 and a last admission date of 4/6/23. R9 had the following pertinent diagnoses: Chronic Respiratory Failure with Hypercapnia (breathing difficulty due to a high level of carbon dioxide) and Tracheostomy status (dated 2023). (A tracheostomy is a surgically created opening in the neck for access to the windpipe) On 10/28/24 at 9:25 AM during observation of tracheostomy care and after completion of care, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) J searched for the emergency tracheostomy. LPN J searched through the equipment on R9's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-30 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation and record review, facility failed to ensure one (resident#20) of one resident was assessed to safely self-administer medications. Resident #20 (R20) Review of the medical record reflected R20 was an initial admission to the facility on [DATE] with a readmission on [DATE]. Diagnoses of Parkinsons Disease, Diabetes Mellitus, Dementia, Cardiac Arrhythmias, Anxiety, Chronic Pain and weakness. The most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 09/12/2024, revealed R20 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of 15 (cognitively intact) out of 15. Under section G0100, Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Assistance reveals R20 requires minimal assistance with personal care. During an interview and observation on 10/28/24 at 09:00am, R20 had her morning medication brought into her room by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) N, who handed R20 a med cup with 14 pills in it. R20 asked LPN N for some applesauce to swallow the one of the large pills. LPN N left the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-30 · tag F0849 — isolatedArrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper communication/documentation of Hospice services provided to one (Resident #45) of one residents reviewed for Hospice services, resulting in a lack of coordination of comprehensive services and care provided Resident #45 (R45) Review of the medical record reflected R45 was an initial admission to the facility on [DATE] with a readmission on [DATE] and then signed up for hospice services on 08/26/24. Diagnoses of Chronic Kidney Disease, Bacteremia, Osteomyelitis, Methicillin Susceptible Staphylococcus, Diabetes Mellitus, Pressure Ulcer of Sacral Region. The most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 08/16/2024, revealed R45 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of 14 (cognitively intact) out of 15. Under section G0100, Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Assistance reveals R45 requires maximum assistance to dependent with personal care. During an interview and observation on 10/28/24 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-26 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to MI00143615. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure bathing and grooming was provided according to resident preferences for three (Resident #1, #2 and #6) of eight reviewed for hygiene and grooming. Findings include: Resident #1 (R1): Review of the medical record reflected R1 admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted [DATE], with diagnoses that included unspecified dementia, diabetes and left side hemiplegia. The modification annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 3/14/24, reflected R1 scored 10 out of 15 (moderate cognitive impairment) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS-a cognitive screening tool) and had upper and lower extremity impairments on one side of the body. On 4/25/24 at 10:37 AM, R1 was observed lying in bed, wearing a hospital gown. R1 reported she had gone for about one month without her hair being brushed by male staff members. Her hair then had to be cut with scissors, by a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to MI00143615. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe smoking practices for three (Resident #8, #9 and #14) of three reviewed for smoking. Findings include: Resident #8 (R8): Review of the medical record reflected R8 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 3/11/24, reflected R8 scored 15 out of 15 (cognitively intact) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS-a cognitive screening tool). On 4/26/24 at 10:03 AM, R8 was observed seated on the left side of his bed, with a bag of tobacco in his lap, rolling cigarettes. He stated he knew it was a non-smoking facility, but they did allow him to roll cigarettes inside when it was windy or rainy. R8 reported he kept the tobacco in the top drawer of his night stand. R8 stated his lighter stayed in his pocket at all times. He reported he used to have to turn his cigarettes and lighter in, but the facility lost two packs of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-10-17 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide sufficient staff to meet residents needs in seven of eight reported during a confidential Resident Council meeting, and in four of 14 sampled residents (Resident #8, #14, #18 & #252), in a census of 46 residents, resulting in the potential for unmet care needs. Findings include: During a confidential resident council meeting held on 10/16/2023 at 1:30 PM, six of eight residents reported that staff did not respond to call lights timely, sometimes they turn it off without helping or saying anything and they leave. These residents stated that this occurred mainly in the evening and these staff say they don't want to do it and it's not my job. The residents also stated that sometimes the light was on, and staff stand around talking and didn't respond timely. Seven of eight residents reported that they have waited for 30 minutes or more for their call light to be answered, especially on evenings or weekends after management goes home.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-17 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to: (1) effectively date and label cooked food put in the refrigerator, (2) effectively testing and maintaining the three-sink log with correct temperatures and sanitizing times and date effecting 46 residents, resulting in the increased potential for resident foodborne illness. During an observation and interview on 10/15/23 at 09:18 AM with the initial tour of the kitchen, a bowl of a brown substance was located in the refrigerator without a label and no date on the clear wrap over the bowl. Bowl was removed and disposed of by [NAME] L. During this same observation and interview, the three-sink dish washing log was already filled out with all three temperature checks for the whole day under date of 10/15/23. Dietary aide K stated, Oh I must have got confused when I was checking the off the water temperature and sanitation solution levels. Observed K tape the testing trip to the log, then getting some white white-out solution to white out the latter two entries for the day that he had documented on without…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-17 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to promote resident dignity while dining for two of 46 residents reviewed for dining (Resident #8 & #51) resulting in decreased quality of life. Findings include: Resident #8 (R8) On 10/15/23 at 11:52 AM, Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) G was observed assisting R8 with lunch in the assisted dining room. CNA G was observed standing while feeding R8. R8's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date of 6/30/23 indicated she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), a short performance based cognitive screener, score of 07 (00-07 Severe Impairment). The same MDS revealed R8 had a diagnosis of Dementia and was independent in eating with set up help only. Resident #51 (R51) Review of the medical record revealed Resident #51 (R51) was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and then re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Bilateral primary osteoarthritis…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-17 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to complete a level I Preadmission Screening/Annual Resident Review (PASARR) for one (Resident #22) of one residents reviewed for PASARR, resulting in the potential for lack of appropriate mental health treatment and services. Findings include: Resident #22 (R22) R22's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had a brief interview for mental status (BIMS), a short performance-based cognitive screener for nursing home residents, score of 04 (00-07 Severe Impairment). The same MDS assessment indicated R22 had the diagnoses of Non-Alzheimer's dementia, depression, and Bi-polar disorder. Review of the physician signed 3878 dated 10/12/21, R22 was admitted to the facility on a 30-day exemption. There was no other documentation in R22's medical record. R22's PASARR Level 1 dated 10/11/21 indicated it was a Hospital exempted discharge and R22 was expected to require nursing home services for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-17 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement comprehensive care plans for 2 (Resident #6 and #14) of 14 residents reviewed resulting in the potential for unmet care needs. Findings include: Resident #6(R6) Review of the Face Sheet and Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], reflected R6 was a [AGE] year old female admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included alzheimers dementia, heart disease, hypertension (high blood pressure), diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and depression. The MDS reflected R6 had a BIM (assessment tool) score of 3 which indicated her ability to make daily decisions was severely impaired, and she required one person physical assist with bed mobility, dressing, toileting, eating, hygiene, bathing and two person physical assist with transfers. The MDS reflected R6 did not have any behaviors including rejection of care. During an observation on 10/15/23 at 10:42 AM, R6 was observed in bed with hospital gown on,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-17 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to revise resident care plans in three of 14 residents reviewed for care plans (Resident #12, #13, & #28), resulting in the potential for unment needs. Findings include: Resident #13 (R13) R13 was observed lying in bed on 10/15/23 at 1:47 PM, R13 was not wearing dentures, and stated he didn't have dentures. R13's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with assessment reference date (ARD) of 9/30/23 indicated he admitted to the facility on [DATE], had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), a short performance-based cognitive screener, score of 09 (08-12 Moderate Impairment). The same MDS indicated R13 was edentulous (did not have natural teeth or tooth fragments). In review of dental consult dated 7/12/23, R13 had ill fitting dentures, and recommended that the resident ask for some adhesive in the facility, to help with suction for the upper and lower denture. In review of R13's dental health problem care plan dated 10/14/23, R13 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-17 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolatedEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide for one out of three Residents sampled (Resident #12), resulting in the potential for decline in skin integrity without ability to perform own activities of daily living (ADL's). Resident #12 (R12). Review of the medical record revealed Resident #12 (R12) was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and then re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Chronic respiratory failure, heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, obesity, diabetes, blind in both eyes and oxygen dependent. According to Resident #12 (R12)'s Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], revealed R12 scored 13 out of 15 (cognitively intact) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS- a cognitive screening tool) and had no behaviors. R12 requires maximum assistance with all activities of daily living. During an observation on 10/16/23 at 07:54 AM, R12 was sleeping sitting in her wheelchair up against her bed, did not sleep in her bed. R12's had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-17 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received assistance with care according to their care plans for 1 residents(R6) of 3 residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL's), resulting in the increased likelihood for inadequate hygiene and grooming and feelings of embarrassment. Findings include: Resident #6(R6) Review of the Face Sheet and Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], reflected R6 was a [AGE] year old female admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included alzheimers dementia, heart disease, hypertension (high blood pressure), diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and depression. The MDS reflected R6 had a BIM (assessment tool) score of 3 which indicated her ability to make daily decisions was severely impaired, and she required one person physical assist with bed mobility, dressing, toileting, eating, hygiene, bathing and two person physical assist with transfers. The MDS reflected R6 did not have any behaviors…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-17 · tag F0685 — isolatedAssist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to arrange ophthalmology services in one of one reviewed for vision services (Resident #14) resulting in decreased quality of life. Findings include: Resident #14 (R14) On 10/15/23 at 12:42 PM, R14 was observed sitting up in bed and stated she needed glasses and would like to see the eye doctor. R14 stated she had cataracts and that her vision was impaired. R14's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, with assessment reference date (ARD) of 9/21/23 indicated she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]; and had a Brief Interview for Mental Status, a short performance-based cognitive screener for nursing home residents score of 15 (13-15 Cognitively Intact). During an interview on 10/16/23 at 10:02 AM, Social Services E was interviewed and stated R14 was on the list to see the eye doctor on the same day as the interview. In review of eye exam notes dated 03/06/23, R14 received a comprehensive eye exam and was referred to follow up with a cornea…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-17 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement pharmacy recommendations in one of five residents reviewed for medication regimen (Resident #33), resulting in the potential for an oral infection. Findings include: Resident #33 (R33) R33's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had a brief interview for mental status (BIMS), a short performance based cognitive screener for nursing home residents, score of 02 (00-07 Severe Impairment). Note to Attending Physician/Prescriber dated 7/12/23 indicated R33 received Budesonide-Formoterol aerosol, 2 puffs twice daily for Asthma. Pharmacist recommended to consider adding to the order rinse mouth with water and spit back into cup after use to prevent an infection from the steroid component, the same document indicated the physician agreed with the pharmacist's recommendation and was signed by the physician on 7/17/23. In review of R33's physician orders and care plans, the pharmacist recommendation…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-17 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to properly store and secure Schedule II controlled drugs in one of one medication room reviewed for medication storage, resulting in the increased likelihood medication errors and/or diversion. During an interview on 10/15/23 at 4:09 PM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) U reported the facility had four medication carts and one medication room. During an observation on 10/16/23 at 1:44 PM, the Hall A treatment cart was located in the hall , unlocked with no staff in the area until 2:10 p.m. During an observation and interview on 10/17/23 at 9:36 AM, Registered Nurse(RN) T unlocked the medication room and reported nurses and the DON had keys to the medication room. An unlock box was observed in the unlocked refrigerator with a 30 mg bottle of liquid Xanax(controlled medication) for R 36. RN T verified the box was unlocked and should be locked because controlled medications were required to be double locked and was observed locking box with key. RN T reported central supply staff stocked medication room. During an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-17 · tag F0847 — isolatedInform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents/resident's guardians understood the purpose of binding arbitration agreements (an out-of-court alternate form of dispute resolution) for 2 residents, (R37 and R252) of 4 residents reviewed for arbitration, resulting in the residents and/or their representatives to not be informed of their rights. Findings include: During an interview on 10/17/23 at 8:35 AM, NHA A reported residents not required to sign arbitration agreement but have the option to. Informed NHA A had requested list of residents who had signed but had not received list. NHA A reported was unsure how to obtain list but would follow up. NHA A reported no residents had entered into the agreement. NHA A reported the admission staff completed admission documents with each resident but was currently suspended. NHA A reported plan for Business office Manager to complete in her absence at that time. NHA A reported most recent admission was R252 from the the weekend. Review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to in perform hand hygiene per Centers for Disease Control Prevention recommendations and administer eye drops using best practices, in 3 of a census of 46 residents reviewed for infection control practices (Resident #14, #18, & #32), resulting in the potential for the spread of infections. Findings include: Resident #18 (R18) Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) Q was observed administering eye drops to R18 on 10/16/23 at 7:31 AM during medication pass. LPN Q placed the cap of artificial tears down on the over the bed table while administering the eye drops. There was no barrier placed or cleaning of the table prior to eye drop administration. Resident #14 (R14) R14's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, with assessment reference date (ARD) of 9/21/23 indicated she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]; and had a Brief Interview for Mental Status, a short performance-based cognitive screener for nursing home residents score of 15 (13-15 Cognitively…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2023-10-17 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and observation, the facility failed to ensure that the nurse staffing data was posted daily and filled out completely resulting in the potential for all 46 residents as well as visitors to be uninformed of the facility's daily staffing information. Finding include: On 10/15/23 at 09:41 AM, observed daily nurse staff posting was dated 10/13/2023. During an interview on 10/15/23 at 10:47 AM, Director of Nursing (DON) B stated that the scheduler puts the daily nurse staff posting out and said she will check into why it wasn't put up yesterday or today yet. On 10/17/23 at 07:55 AM, observed daily nurse staff posting was up but census information was not filled in. On 10/17/23 at 10:04 AM, DON B stated again that the daily nurse staff posting was done by the scheduler during the week. She said that census was usually added later by the scheduler during the week after morning meeting. DON B stated that on weekends the daily nurse staff posting should be put up by the manager on duty. On 10/17/23 at 04:15 PM upon facility exit noted daily nurse staff posting still did…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to MAJESTIC CARE — 22 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 3 of 5 | 2.5 | +0.5 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 3 of 5 | 2.1 | +0.9 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 1.7 | +0.3 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 4.5 | -0.5 vs chain |
The other 21 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.5★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MAJESTIC MICHIGAN OPERATIONS I LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 07/01/2021 |
| DEM FAMILY TRUST I | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 21% | since 07/01/2021 |
| PRUITT, PAUL | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/01/2023 |
| BATTLE CREEK SNF REALTY LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/01/2021 |
| MAJESTIC MANAGEMENT MICHIGAN LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/01/2021 |
| ALEXANDER, DAVID | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/01/2023 |
| CHAMBERLAIN, MARGARET | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 09/11/2023 |
| JANAS, ANTHONY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2025 |
| MARX, DAVID | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/01/2021 |
| REWA, ANGELA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/23/2023 |
| RUSSELL, ROBERT | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/08/2024 |
| SHATROV, ANZHELIKA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/02/2024 |
| TIERNAN, SALINA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 08/26/2024 |
| WOLFE, ERIC | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 09/11/2023 |
| 4 MDR OF QUEENS INC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/01/2021 |
| MDG MAJESTIC MICHIGAN REALTY I LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/01/2021 |
| MDG REAL ESTATE GLOBAL LIMITED | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/01/2021 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 30 rows in the source record cover these 17 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
7 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 73% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $581K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in MI
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Michigan Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 235023. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-01-16, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.