No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Majestic Care Of Perrysburg

28546 Starbright Blvd, Perrysburg, OH 43551 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 75 certified beds · (419) 666-0935 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (419) 666-0935 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0606) — cited Apr 2026Resident-funds citations (F0567, F0569)
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0606), cited Apr 2026
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has citations for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0567, F0569)
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (65) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (63%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 4 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
28555 Starbright Blvd · (419) 931-3030 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
28727 Oregon Rd
Grocery
Meijer3.1 mi
10055 Olde US 20 · (419) 873-4100 · Call to confirm hours
Park
30730 Oregon Rd · (419) 661-5113 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased3.2%5.3%15.4%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight9.5%6.2%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.2%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%0.4%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms9.0%30.1%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury6.7%3.2%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened9.8%6.1%16.1%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication32.3%25.5%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine94.1%94.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers0.6%3.4%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control29.8%21.4%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table7.3%8.8%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication4.7%1.2%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine36.0%75.6%79.4%worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

0.12U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.06hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.12 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 8% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 5% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identifiednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF staynot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsenednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFsnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.33
RN hours/ resident / day
1.08
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.71
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.12
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.18
RN hoursweekends
63.2%
Total nursing turnover
40.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 75 beds and averages 55.5 residents a day — about 74% occupied, or roughly 20 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.12 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.33 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.71 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.80 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.26 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.39 to 0.18 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 63% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

17
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-04-24)
8
at the previous standard inspection (2024-03-28)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

65 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 55 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · F2026-04-24 · tag F0606 — failed to not employ staff found guilty of abuse — widespread
    Not hire anyone with a finding of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of personnel files, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure newly hired staff were checked on the nurse aide registry to verify eligibility for employment prior to working with residents in the facility. This had the potential to affect all 52 residents in the facility. The facility census was 52.Findings include:Review of the personnel file for Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #152 revealed a hire date of 02/18/26. Further review revealed no evidence LPN #152 was searched on the nurse aide registry prior to working in the facility.Interview on 04/20/26 at approximately 12:40 P.M. with Human Resources Manager (HRM) #125 revealed he did not perform nurse aide registry searches for applicants prior to hiring into the facility. HRM #125 stated he believed the registry was checked through the corporation's comprehensive background check. HRM #125 stated he performed nurse aide registry searches during his previous employment elsewhere, but did not receive direction to do so in his current position.Interview on 04/20/26 at approximately 4:00 P.M.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-04-24 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, medical record review, policy review and review of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines, the facility failed to implement and monitor Legionella control measures. This had the potential to affect all residents. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) were implemented. This affected three (#1, #3 and #47) of three residents reviewed for transmission-based precautions (TBP). The facility census was 52. Findings include:1. Review of the facility's Legionella Water Management Plan, dated 12/01/25, revealed the Legionella prevention and monitoring tasks were to include flushing hot and cold water for three to five minutes each in empty rooms and in less frequently used outlets, including soiled utility rooms, medication rooms, shower stalls, private room showers and all eyewash stations. Furthermore, the Legionella Water Management Plan included a prevention task of cleaning and disinfecting or replacement of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-24 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff and resident interviews, review of open and closed medical records, review of the facility water temperature logs and policy review, the facility failed to ensure shower water temperatures in the East Hall shower room were adequately warm. This affected four (#19, #24, #55 and #63) of four residents reviewed for comfortable and homelike environment. The facility identified 15 (#4, #11, #14, #26, #28, #29, #30, #31, #37, #39, #41, #47, #48, #50 and #56) additional residents who used the East-hall shower room. The facility census was 52.Findings include:1. Review of the medical record for Resident #19 revealed an admission date of 02/27/25 with diagnoses of congestive heart failure, weakness, and parkinsonism. Review of the significant change comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 02/18/26, revealed Resident #19 had impaired cognition and was dependent on staff for showers/bathing.Interview on 04/16/26 at 11:11 A.M. with Resident #19 revealed he rarely used the shower. Resident #19 stated the water in the shower room was too cold, but staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-04-24 · tag F0641 — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of open and closed medical records, observations, resident and staff interviews and review of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Long-Term Care (LTC) Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) 3.0 User's Manual, the facility failed to ensure the accuracy of Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments. This affected four (#29, #40, #55 and #62) of nine residents reviewed for MDS assessments. The facility census was 52.Findings include:1. Review of the medical record for Resident #29 revealed an admission date of 03/14/25 with diagnoses including traumatic subdural hemorrhage, Type Two diabetes mellitus, alcohol use, dysphagia, cognitive communication deficit, slurred speech, and unsteadiness on his feet.Review of the annual MDS assessment, dated 03/20/26, revealed Resident #29 had moderate cognitive impairment and did not exhibit aggressive behaviors, refusals of care, nor wandering behaviors.Review of Section E of the MDS assessment, dated 03/20/26, revealed the point of care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-24 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff interviews and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure dependent residents received appropriate bathing, showers, grooming and fingernail care. This affected four (#14, #57, #62 and #63) of five residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs). The facility census was 52. Findings include:1. Review of Resident #14's medical record revealed an admission date of 05/06/21 with diagnoses including, malignant neoplasm of bronchus or lung, metabolic encephalopathy, schizophrenia, dementia, pulmonary embolism, malnutrition, pain, esophagitis, intellectual disability, anemia, and anxiety disorder. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 02/18/26, revealed Resident #14 was severely cognitively impaired, utilized a wheelchair for mobility, required substantial to maximal assistance with ADLs, was incontinent of bowel and bladder, received a mechanically altered diet, was at risk for pressure ulcer development, and received Hospice…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, open and closed medical record review, staff interview, resident interview, review of the facility elopement investigation files and review of facility policies, the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision was provided for residents assessed to be at risk for elopement. This affected one (#29) of one resident reviewed for elopement. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure smoking materials were properly stored. This affected one (#56) of two residents reviewed for smoking. Lastly, the facility failed to ensure neurological assessments were thoroughly completed following falls. This affected one (#63) of two residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 52. Findings include:1. Review of the medical record for Resident #29 revealed he was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including traumatic subdural hemorrhage, Type II diabetes mellitus, alcohol use with withdrawal, dysphagia, cognitive communication deficit, slurred speech, anxiety, and unsteadiness on his feet. Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-04-24 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observations, staff interviews, review of an equipment compliance report, review of the user manual and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure emergency respiratory equipment was at the bedside for a tracheostomy. This affected one (#3) of one resident reviewed for tracheostomy care. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure physician orders for the administration of oxygen. This affected two (#30 and #40) of five residents reviewed for oxygen therapy. Lastly, the facility failed to ensure Bilevel Positive Airway Pressure (BIPAP) therapy was initiated as ordered and BIPAP machine maintenance was completed. This affected one (#4) of one resident reviewed for BIPAP therapy. The facility census was 52. Findings include:1. Review of the medical record for Resident #3 revealed he was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including acquired deformity of head, disorders of the meninges, cognitive communication deficit, chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-24 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to store food in a safe and sanitary manner. This had the potential to affect 50 residents, Residents #3 and #37 received no food by mouth and thus received no food from the kitchen. The facility census was 52.Findings include:Observation on 04/13/26 at 8:05 A.M. of the dry food storage area revealed an opened box on the floor containing six 104-ounce cans of applesauce. On top of the applesauce was an unopened box containing six five-pound pouches of cornbread mix. On top of the cornbread mix was an opened box containing two sealed 10-pound bags of elbow macaroni. On the floor next to the applesauce was an unopened box containing six 57-ounce cartons of mashed potato flakes. On the floor next to the mashed potato flakes was an unopened box containing four 35-ounce bags of frosted flakes.Observation on 04/13/26 at 8:15 A.M. of the walk-in freezer revealed a box on the floor containing cracked wheat pull-apart rolls. On top…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-24 · tag F0557 — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure resident respect and dignity was maintained. This affected one (#5) of three residents reviewed for respect and dignity. The facility census was 52.Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction, dysphagia and dementia without behavioral disturbance.Review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 04/15/26, revealed Resident #5 was rarely/never understood. Resident #5 was dependent on staff for eating. Review of revised care plan dated 04/01/26 revealed Resident #5 had an Activities of Daily Living (ADL) self-care performance deficit. Interventions included partial assistance of one staff member to eat. Observation on 04/14/26 at 8:22 A.M. revealed approximately 13 residents were in the secured unit dining area awaiting breakfast.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-24 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on open and closed medical record review, staff interviews, and review of facility policy and procedures, the facility failed to ensure a baseline care plan was developed and provided to Resident #63's representative and further failed to ensure a baseline care plan for Resident #30 addressed the resident's care needs. This affected two (#63 and #30) of two residents reviewed for baseline care plans. The facility census was 52.Findings include:1. Review of the closed medical record for Resident #63 revealed an admission date of 03/10/26 with diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, anxiety, Type II diabetes mellitus, heart disease and restless legs. Resident #63 discharged from the facility on 03/26/26. Review of the admission comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 03/17/26, revealed Resident #63 required substantial/maximal assistance for toileting hygiene, showering/bathing and upper body dressing and was dependent for lower body dressing and personal hygiene. Additionally,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 55 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-24 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, staff interview and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure non-pressure ulcer wound care was initiated timely upon admission and completed as ordered. This affected two (#1 and #55) of three residents reviewed for wound care. The facility census was 52.Findings include:1. Review of the medical record for Resident #1 revealed an admission date of 03/12/26 with diagnoses including subsequent encounter of bladder injury, septic shock, ascites, Type Two diabetes mellitus, polyneuropathy, irritable bowel syndrome, cystocele, peritonitis and stage three chronic kidney disease.Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 03/19/26, revealed Resident #1 was cognitively intact and did not display any behaviors nor refusals of care at the time of this assessment. She required maximal assistance to full dependence with activities of daily living (ADLs), bed mobility, and transfers. Resident #1 utilized a wheelchair and was depended for mobility.Review of the current care plan for Resident #1 revealed interventions for skin…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-24 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolated
    Provide appropriate foot care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure timely assessment and preventative interventions were implemented for a diabetic foot ulcer. This affected one (#47) of one resident reviewed for diabetic foot care. The facility census was 52. Findings include:Review of Resident #47's medical record revealed an admission date of 05/20/20 with diagnoses including schizoaffective disorder, Type II diabetes mellitus, history of diabetic ulcers, dementia, peripheral vascular disease, hypertension, chronic pain syndrome, insomnia, and hypothyroidism.Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 03/12/26, revealed Resident #47 was assessed with moderately impaired cognition, no recorded resistive behaviors, required setup or clean-up assistance with eating, was dependent for activities of daily living (ADLs), required substantial to maximal assistance with bed mobility and was not at risk of developing pressure ulcers with a diabetic foot…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-24 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview, and facility policy, the facility failed to ensure hemodialysis access sites were properly assessed and monitored. This affected one (#7) of one resident reviewed for dialysis care. The facility census was 52. Findings include:Review of Resident #7's medical record revealed an admission date of 10/06/20. Diagnoses included end stage renal disease, dependence on renal dialysis, arteriovenous fistula, hypertension, malnutrition, hydronephrosis, hypotension, major depression, malignant neoplasm of prostate, and anemia.Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 01/14/26, revealed Resident #7 was assessed with intact cognition and received dialysis. Review of the care plan, dated 01/15/24, revealed Resident #7 received hemodialysis related to (r/t) end stage renal disease (ESRD). Interventions included: left arm fistula; hemodialysis on Tuesday, Thursday and Saturday with usual chair time at 6:00 A.M.; will have no signs/symptoms of complications from dialysis treatments through the review date; monitor left arm…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-24 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered in accordance with physician orders and within prescribed time frames for five of 32 observed medications administered, resulting in a 15.63% medication error rate. This affected one (#47) of four residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 52. Findings include:Observation on 04/13/26 at 11:22 A.M. revealed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #145 prepared Resident #47's medications for administration. Medications included the following: cephalexin 500 milligrams (mg) one tablet, Austedo 12 mg one tablet, Risperdal 0.25 mg one tablet, metoprolol tartrate 50 mg one tablet, and an insulin glargine pen set with 10 units. Continued observation revealed LPN #145 entered Resident #47's room at 11:25 A.M. and administered the medications, including 10 units of insulin via subcutaneous injection to the resident's right upper extremity.Review of Resident #47's medical record revealed the resident had the following…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-24 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure insulin was administered in accordance with physician orders. This affected one (#47) of four residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 52. Findings include:Observation on 04/13/26 at 11:22 A.M. revealed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #145 prepared Resident #47's medications for administration. Medications included the following: cephalexin 500 milligrams (mg) one tablet, Austedo 12 mg one tablet, Risperdal 0.25 mg one tablet, metoprolol tartrate 50 mg one tablet, and an insulin glargine pen set with 10 units. Continued observation revealed LPN #145 proceeded to Resident #47's room at 11:25 A.M. and administered the medications, including 10 units of insulin via subcutaneous injection to the right upper extremity. Review of Resident #47's medical record revealed the resident had the following physician medication orders: cephalexin 500 mg, give one tablet by mouth two times a day for wound infection seven days with administration…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-24 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, medical record review and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure medications were not left unattended at bedside. This affected one (#4) of four residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 52.Findings include:Review of Resident #4's medical record revealed an admission date of 01/25/21 with diagnoses including peripheral vascular disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, Type II diabetes mellitus, bipolar disorder, major depression, anxiety disorder, neuropathy, restless leg syndrome, anemia, chronic viral hepatitis c, transient ischemic attack, and hypertension.Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 03/26/26, revealed Resident #4 was assessed with intact cognition and required setup/clean-up assistance with activities of daily living. Resident #4 received antianxiety, antidepressant, anticoagulant, diuretic, opioid, antiplatelet, hypoglycemic and anticonvulsant medications. Observation on 04/14/26 at 7:42 A.M. revealed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #130 prepared Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-24 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on closed medical record review, staff interviews and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure complete and accurate documentation in the medical record. This affected one (#59) of three residents reviewed for accurate medical records. The facility census was 52. Findings include:Review of the closed medical record for Resident #59 revealed an admission date of 11/21/25 and a discharge date of 02/10/26. Diagnoses included traumatic subdural hemorrhage, intracranial abscess and granuloma and dependence on respirator (ventilator) status. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 02/06/26, revealed Resident #59 had impaired cognition. Further review revealed a Discharge Return Anticipated MDS was completed on 02/10/26. Review of the facility's Admission, Discharge, and Transfer Report, from 02/01/26 through 02/28/26, revealed Resident #59 was discharged to the hospital on [DATE]. Interview on 04/15/26 at 12:10 P.M. with the Interim Director of Nursing (IDON) and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-10 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a call light was within reach. This affected one (#46) of six residents reviewed for call lights. The facility census was 55.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #46 revealed an admission date of 01/13/25 with diagnoses including but not limited to adult failure to thrive, hemiplegia/hemiparesis affecting non-dominant left side, and major depressive disorder.Review of The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had severe cognitive impairment. The resident was dependent on staff for activities of daily living with the exception of eating.Review of the care plan dated 10/08/25 revealed the resident is at risk for falls related to decline in functional mobility, stroke with left sided weakness, and non-ambulatory status. Interventions included ensure call light is within reach and encourage resident to use it for assistance as needed.Observation and interview on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-10 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to report an allegation of an injury of unknown origin to the State Agency. This affected one (#31) of three residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 55.Review of the medical record for Resident #31 revealed an admission date of 03/27/25 with diagnoses including but not limited to anoxic brain damage, gastrostomy status, tracheostomy status, anxiety, cognitive communication deficit, and dysphagia.Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was rarely/never understood and had severe cognitive impairment. The resident was dependent on staff for all activities of daily living.Review of the care plan dated 11/10/25 revealed the resident had the potential/actual impairment to skin integrity. Interventions included avoid scratching and keep hands and body parts from excessive moisture, keep fingernails short, and use caution during transfers and bed mobility to prevent striking arms, legs, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-10 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to investigate a injury of unknown origin. This affected one (#31) of three residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 55.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #31 revealed an admission date of 03/27/25 with diagnoses including but not limited to anoxic brain damage, gastrostomy status, tracheostomy status, anxiety, cognitive communication deficit, and dysphagia.Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was rarely/never understood and had severe cognitive impairment. The resident was dependent on staff for all activities of daily living.Review of the care plan dated 11/10/25 revealed the resident had the potential/actual impairment to skin integrity. Interventions included avoid scratching and keep hands and body parts from excessive moisture, keep fingernails short, and use caution during transfers and bed mobility to prevent striking arms, legs, and hands against…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-23 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure care plans were implemented and contained resident specific goals and preferences regarding discharges. This affected two (#53 and #54) of seven residents reviewed for care plans. The facility census was 51.Findings include:1. Review of the medical record for Resident #53 revealed an admission date of 06/02/25 and discharge date of 08/01/25. Diagnoses included but were not limited to hypertension, congestive heart failure, chronic pain disorder, and major depressive disorder.Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #53 was cognitively intact.Review of the care plan dated 06/03/25 revealed Resident #53's discharge plan included interventions for social services to assist with discharge planning. The care plan was not specific to the resident's preference and potential for future discharge and lacked evidence the facility determined the resident's desire to return to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure falls were thoroughly investigated to determine a root cause, documented in the medical record, and immediate interventions were put in place which were appropriate. This affected three (#5, #13, and #54) of three residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 51.Findings include:1. Review of the medical record for Resident #5 revealed an admission date of 12/08/23 with diagnoses including but not limited to dementia mild with agitation, syncope and collapse, muscle weakness, difficulty walking, and cognitive communication deficit.Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #5 had severe cognitive impairment and required supervision or touching assistance for bed mobility, transfers, and ambulation.Review of the care plan dated 09/03/25 revealed Resident #5 was at risk for falls related to dementia, side effects of medications, diagnosis of syncope and collapse, muscle…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-23 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, review of meal tickets, resident and staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure nutritional assessments were completed timely to determine dietary preferences and failed to ensure food preferences were honored. This affected two (#32 and #54) of four residents reviewed for nutrition. The facility census was 51.Findings include:1. Review of the medical record for Resident #32 revealed an admission date of 02/27/25 with diagnoses including but not limited to congestive heart failure, Parkinsonism, type two diabetes mellitus, weakness, hypertension, and malignant neoplasm of the prostate.Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #32 had moderate cognitive impairment.Review of a care plan dated 02/27/25 revealed Resident #32 presented with a potential nutritional risk related to a therapeutic diet and diabetes with interventions included to honor food/fluid preferences, and provide and serve diet as ordered.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-15 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interviews, wound clinic staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure wound care treatments and follow-up appointments were completed as ordered. This affected three (#127, #134, and #160) of four residents reviewed for wound care. The facility census was 58.Findings include:1. Review of the medical record for Resident #127 revealed he was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included atherosclerotic heart disease, peripheral vascular disease, hypertension, and atherosclerosis of native arteries of the left leg with ulceration of the heel and midfoot. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #160 was cognitively intact and did not refuse care. Review of the current care plan for Resident #127 revealed Resident #127 had an open chest lesion. The interventions included treatment to chest per orders.Review of the physician orders and treatment administration records (TAR) for Resident #127 revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-15 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure pressure ulcer treatments were completed as ordered. This affected two (#134 and #140) of four residents reviewed for wound care. The facility census was 58.Findings include:1. Review of the medical record for Resident #134 revealed he was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included disorder of lipoprotein, myelodysplastic syndrome (disorder affecting bone marrow), and non-pressure chronic ulcer of the right heel and midfoot with the fat layer exposed. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #160 was moderately cognitively impaired, and he did not refuse care.Review of the current care plan for Resident #134 revealed he had impaired skin integrity. The interventions included wound treatment as ordered.Review of the physician orders and treatment administration records (TAR) for Resident #134 revealed orders beginning on 06/21/25 for daily wound care to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-12-19 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — pattern
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, review of pest control service records, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the facility was free of ants. This affected five residents (#20, #25, #6, #41, #27) and the potential to affect an additional 13 residents (#2, #7, #8, #11, #13, #14, #18, #21, #22, #30, #32, #36, #47) residing on the 400 hall. The facility census was 46. Findings include: Review of the pest control service records revealed the facility had not received preventative pest control treatments since 08/21/24. No pest control services were provided in 09/2024, 10/2024, and 11/2024. Additionally, no pest control services were provided in the facility from 12/01/24 through 12/15/24. Observation on 12/16/24 at 8:04 A.M., in Resident #25's room revealed there approximately 12 ants on the floor near the wall. Observation on 12/16/24 at 8:06 A.M. in the shared room of Resident #27 and Resident #41 revealed there were approximately 15 ants on the floor near the wall. Observation on 12/16/24 at 8:07 A.M. in Resident #6's room revealed there was one ant on the floor…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-19 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of a wound care treatment progress note, review of physician orders, observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to correctly identify the type and location of a wound. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure wound care treatments were completed per physician orders. This affected one (#30) of three residents reviewed for wound care. The facility identified seven residents requiring wound care management. The facility census was 46. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #30 revealed an admission date of 10/19/19. Diagnoses included multiple sclerosis, vascular dementia, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting left non-dominant side, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and hypertension. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had impaired cognition. The resident was dependent for toileting hygiene and personal hygiene. Review of a nurse's progress note dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-19 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the medical record, observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure incontinence care was provided timely. This affected one (#30) of three residents reviewed for incontinence care. The facility census was 46. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #30 revealed an admission date of 10/19/19. Diagnoses included multiple sclerosis, vascular dementia, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting left non-dominant side, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and hypertension. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had impaired cognition. The resident was always incontinent of bladder and frequently incontinent of bowel. The resident was dependent on staff for toileting hygiene and personal hygiene. Review of the plan of care dated initiated 09/14/20 revealed the resident was incontinent related to multiple sclerosis and weakness. Interventions noted the resident was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-12 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of physician orders, review of the medication administration record, review of a pharmacy invoice, review of contingency medication supply records, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to timely clarify physician orders and ensure medications were administered per physician orders. This affected one resident (#50) of three residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 49. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #50 revealed an admission date of 06/30/24 and a discharge date d of 07/25/24. Diagnoses included cirrhosis of the liver, hepatic encephalopathy, hypertension, peripheral vascular disease, diabetes mellitus type two, fibromyalgia and bipolar disorder. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had cognitive impairment. Review of the hospital discharge medication orders dated 06/30/24 revealed Resident #50 was ordered pregabalin (Lyrica) 50 milligrams (mg) three times a day…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-28 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, staff interviews, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to maintain resident dignity when dining. This affected five (#9, #21, #30, #32, and #51) of 13 residents observed during meals. The census was 50. Findings Include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #32 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included hypercholesterolemia, hypotension, generalized anxiety disorder (GAD), muscle weakness, other abnormalities of gait and mobility, difficulty in walking, cognitive communication deficit, personal history of COVID-19, and pain. Review of the most recent quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 03/06/24, for Resident #32 revealed the resident was severely cognitively impaired and required supervision or touching assistance with eating. Review of the most recent care plan revealed Resident #32 was identified to have behaviors of throwing non-disposable cutlery and dishes in the garbage. Interventions, dated 09/16/22 and resolved on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-28 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure resident wheelchairs were kept in a clean and sanitary manner. This affected three (#25, #32 and #43) of three residents reviewed for wheelchairs. The census was 50. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #25 was admitted on [DATE] with a re-admission date of 02/16/23. Diagnoses included multiple sclerosis, vascular dementia severity with agitation, type two diabetes mellitus with diabetic neuropathy, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting the left non-dominant side, and other abnormalities of gait and mobility. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 01/19/24, revealed Resident #25 was assessed with moderate cognitive impaired and used a wheelchair. Observation on 03/25/24 at 9:42 A.M. with Resident #25 revealed the resident was in his wheelchair and the wheelchair had a thick build-up of dirt and debris along the outside. Observation on 03/27/24 at 3:53 P.M. revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-28 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, staff and resident interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to maintain proper infection control practices when providing care and services. This affected four (#18, #26, #37, and #48) of 14 residents observed receiving care and services from staff. The facility census was 50. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #18 revealed an admission date of 09/29/20 with diagnoses of hypertension, gastroesophageal reflux, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #18 had intact cognition. Review of Resident #18's current physician orders upon entrance on 03/25/24 revealed an order for the antibiotic Augmentin every twelve hours from 03/04/24 to 03/11/24, and contact precautions for a urinary tract infection with extended spectrum beta lactamase (ESBL) and Escherichia coli (E-coli). Observation on 03/25/24 at 12:08 P.M. revealed as State Tested…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-28 · tag F0569 — isolated
    Notify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of resident funds accounts, fund balance notification documents, medical record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure notifications of funds in excess of the Medicaid limit were followed up with timely notification and assistance to lower the fund balance. This affected three residents (#03, #24 and #27) of five reviewed for personal funds. The facility census was 50. Findings Include: 1. Review of Resident #03's personal funds account revealed a balance of $3,277.29 on 03/31/23, a balance of $3,349.38 on 06/30/23, a balance of $3,412.47 on 09/29/23, a balance of $3,502.56 on 12/29/23, and a balance of $3,529.60 on 03/26/24. Further review revealed the facility sent a document titled, Resident Fund Balance Notification, on 01/23/24 and 03/22/24 to the resident's representative indicating they were to notify the Social Worker within the next seven days to discuss ways to assure continuance of Medicaid benefits. There was no record of a discussion with the representative located in Resident #03's medical record. 2. Review of Resident #24's personal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-28 · tag F0637 — isolated
    Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive assessment was completed timely after a significant change in a resident's status. This affected one (#47) of 14 residents reviewed for assessments. The facility census was 50. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #47 revealed an admission date of 08/03/23 with diagnoses of congestive heart failure and hemiplegia and hemiparesis affecting the left non-dominant side. Review of Resident #47's physician orders revealed an order dated 09/07/23 to admit Resident #47 to hospice with a diagnoses of diastolic heart failure. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a comprehensive assessment was completed due to a significant change in Resident #47's status. Interview on 03/27/24 at 4:05 P.M. with Regional Support Registered Nurse #90 confirmed Resident #47 was admitted to hospice on 09/07/23 and a significant change comprehensive MDS assessment was not completed until…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-28 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, hospital documentation review, staff interview, and review of a facility policy, the facility failed to develop a care plan with appropriate interventions when a resident was readmitted to the facility with a new diagnosis following a hospitalization. This affected one resident (#42) of 14 residents reviewed for care plans. The facility census was 50. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #42 revealed an admission date of 05/05/22. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, major depressive disorder, hypertension, heart failure, and dementia. On 02/20/24 a diagnoses was added to include a subdural hematoma (a collection of blood between the brain and its outermost cover) when the resident was re-admitted to the facility from a hospitalization. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #42 was assessed with cognitive impairment and was dependent on staff for activities of daily living. Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-28 · tag F0773 — isolated
    Provide or obtain laboratory tests/services when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of a facility policy, the facility failed to ensure laboratory tests were completed as ordered by the physician. This affected one (#42) of six residents reviewed for laboratory testing. The facility census was 50. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #42 revealed an admission date of 05/05/22. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, major depressive disorder, hypertension, heart failure, and dementia A diagnosis of a subdural hematoma (a collection of blood between the brain and the outermost cover) was added on 02/20/24 when the resident was readmitted from a hospitalization. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #42 was assessed with cognitive impairment and was dependent on staff for activities of daily living. Review of the hospital discharge record for continuation of care printed on 02/20/24 at 6:11 P.M. revealed Resident #42 was discharged back to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-28 · tag F0777 — isolated
    Provide or obtain x-rays/tests when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, hospital documentation review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure diagnostic services were provided as ordered. This affected one resident (#42) of 14 residents reviewed for care and services. The facility census was 50. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #42 revealed an admission date of 05/05/22. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, major depressive disorder, hypertension, heart failure, and dementia. On 02/20/24 a diagnoses was added to include a subdural hematoma (a collection of blood between the brain and its outermost cover) following a readmission to the facility from a hospitalization. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #42 was assessed with cognitive impairment and was dependent on staff for activities of daily living. Review of the progress notes dated 02/17/24 at 3:32 A.M. revealed Resident #42 was sweaty and difficult to arouse, so the physician was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-03-05 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on review of staffing schedules, review of daily posted staffing information, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a Registered Nurse (RN) was present in the facility eight hours per day, seven days per week. This had the potential to affect all residents. The facility census was 52. Findings include: Review of the daily staffing schedules and daily posted staffing documentation from 02/01/24 through 03/03/24 revealed there was no RN coverage in the facility on 02/04/24, 02/10/24, 02/17/24, 02/25/24, 03/02/24, and 03/03/24. Interview on 03/05/24 at 12:18 P.M., the Administrator revealed the only RN employed by the facility was the Director of Nursing. The Administrator verified there was no RN coverage in the building on 02/04/24, 02/10/24, 02/17/24, 02/25/24, 03/02/24, and 03/03/24. Review of the policy titled, Nursing Department Guidelines, last revised 11/2022 revealed the facility would staff a RN eight consecutive hours seven days a week. This deficiency represents non-compliance investigated under Master Complaint Number OH00151286.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the medical record, review of a risk alert document, review of fall investigations, observation, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a thorough investigation was completed to determine how a resident exited the facility through a locked door in the memory care unit. This affected one (Resident #21) of three residents reviewed for elopement. The facility identified five residents (#21, #34, #40, #50 #51) at risk for elopement. Additionally, the facility failed to complete a thorough falls investigation and implement new fall prevention interventions to potentially prevent additional falls for one resident. This affected one (Resident #27) of three residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 52. Findings include 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #21 had an admission date of 06/09/23. Diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease, chronic pain, and difficulty walking. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-12-07 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, review of facility policy, and review of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines, the facility failed to ensure pneumococcal vaccines were offered to residents per CDC recommendations. This affected four (#40, #43, #51, and #54) of five residents reviewed for pneumococcal vaccination. Additionally, the facility failed to provide vaccination education to one (#11) of five residents reviewed for pneumococcal vaccinations. The facility census was 56. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #11 revealed an admission date of 09/20/22. Diagnoses included end stage renal disease and acquired absence of other organs. Review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 10/08/23, revealed Resident #11 had intact cognition. Review of the immunization record in the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed Resident #11 refused the pneumococcal vaccine. No date of refusal was documented in the record and there was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-07 · tag F0887 — isolated
    Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, review of facility policy, and review of a Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines, the facility failed to ensure COVID-19 vaccination booster doses were offered to residents. This affected two (#11 and #51 ) of five residents reviewed for COVID-19 vaccination booster status. The facility census was 56. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #11 revealed an admission date of 09/20/22. Diagnoses included end stage renal disease and acquired absence of other organs. Review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #11 had intact cognition. Review of the immunization record in the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed no evidence Resident #11 was offered the COVID-19 Bivalent Booster. 2. Review of the medical record for Resident #51 revealed an admission date of 01/25/21. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and type II diabetes mellitus. Review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-09-05 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of staff schedules, review of facility documentation, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed ensure registered nurse (RN) services were utilized at least eight consecutive hours a day, seven days a week as required. This had the potential to affect all 53 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: Review of the staffing schedule, dated 08/20/23 to 08/26/23, revealed all the nursing staff were licensed practical nurses (LPN) with the exception of RN #204, who was scheduled for orientation for six hours on 08/20/23. Review of the facility provided document revealed on a rotational basis a Corporate RN was utilized in the building Monday through Friday. There was no RN coverage on the weekend. Interview on 08/30/23 at 4:14 P.M. with Scheduler #202 revealed all nurses employed at the facility were LPN and did not have any RN to fill in the schedule resulting in no RN coverage on the weekend. Review of the facility policy titled Nursing Department Staffing Guidelines, revised November 2022, revealed the facility will staff a RN for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-05 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, medical record review, and review of manufacturer instructions, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered per manufacturer instructions, resulting in a medication error rate of five percent (%) or greater. There were three medication errors out of 31 opportunities, resulting in a medication error rate of 9.68%. This affected two (Residents #11 and #48) of four residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 53. Findings include: 1. Review of the physician orders dated 03/08/23 revealed Resident #48 had an order to obtain a fingerstick blood sugar before meals (AC) and at bedtime (HS). On 04/19/23, the physician order was to administer 34 units of insulin via Humalog Kwik Pen Solution Pen-injector subcutaneously before meals and at bedtime for diabetes; give 32 units along with sliding scale coverage with lunch and dinner and 14 additional units with nighttime snack. In addition, on 04/19/23, the physician ordered insulin sliding scale to include via Humalog Kwik Pen Solution Pen-injector…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-05 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, staff interviews, medical record reviews, and review of manufacturer instructions, the facility failed to ensure the administration of insulin medications were provided in accordance with instructions for use which resulted significant medication errors and potential dosage errors. This affected two (Residents #11 and #48) of four residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 53. Findings include: 1. Review of the physician orders dated 03/08/23 revealed Resident #48 had an order to obtain a fingerstick blood sugar before meals (AC) and at bedtime (HS). On 04/19/23, the physician order was to administer 34 units of insulin via Humalog Kwik Pen Solution Pen-injector subcutaneously before meals and at bedtime for diabetes; give 32 units along with sliding scale coverage with lunch and dinner and 14 additional units with nighttime snack. In addition, on 04/19/23, the physician ordered insulin sliding scale to include via Humalog Kwik Pen Solution Pen-injector subcutaneously before meals and at bedtime. Sliding scale dosages were as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-03-31 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to serve meals in a dignified manner by serving meals on disposable dishware and cutlery. This had the potential to affect all residents except for Residents #26, #27, #30, #36, #39, #40 who did not identify dignity concerns and Residents #197 and #198 identified by the facility as residents who did not receive food from the kitchen (did not eat by mouth). The facility census was 47. Findings include: Observation on 03/28/22 at 8:41 A.M. of the memory care unit dining room revealed residents eating breakfast. Breakfast was served in Styrofoam containers. Beverages, with the exception of coffee, was served in Styrofoam cups, and residents had plastic cutlery. Observation on 03/29/22 at 8:43 A.M. of the East Wing breakfast tray service revealed meals were served in Styrofoam containers, beverages were served in Styrofoam cups, and plastic cutlery was provided to residents. Observation on 03/29/22 at 12:00 P.M. of the East Wing lunch tray service revealed meals were served in Styrofoam containers,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-03-31 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of Resident Trust Account Authorizations, facility policy, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents had reasonable access to personal funds. This affected Residents #2, #3, #4, #7, #10, #11, #12, #13, #14, #15, #16, #17, #18, #20, #21, #22, #24, #25, #26, #27, #28, #29, #30, #31, #32, #33, #34, #35, #36, #37, #38, #39, #40, #41, #42, and #43 identified by the facility as having Resident Trust Accounts. In addition, the facility failed to have signed witnessed authorizations for two (#15 and #20) of five residents reviewed for personal funds. The facility census was 47. Findings include: 1. Interview on 03/31/22 at 1:40 P.M. Receptionist #550 reported the facility did not have a business office manager and she managed resident's personal funds at the facility. Receptionist #550 stated residents were able to come to her Monday through Thursday from 8:30 A.M. until 3:30 P.M. and on Fridays from 8:30 A.M. until 3:00 P.M. Receptionist #550 stated the facility did not have another designated person for residents to go to to get money. Receptionist #550…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-03-31 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of policy for wound care, policy for falls, and policy for neurological assessments, the facility failed to provide non-pressure wound care as ordered for two (Residents #27 and #45) of three residents reviewed for wound care, failed to conduct neurological assessments for two (Residents #15 and #42) of three residents reviewed for falls, and failed to complete post fall assessments for one (Resident #42) of three residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 47. Findings include: 1. Record review of Resident #45 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses for Resident #45 included osteomyelitis, chronic respiratory failure, infection in surgical wound, malnutrition, hernia, stage IV pressure ulcer of sacrum, sepsis, and spinal stenosis. Review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #45 had intact cognition, was a one person physical assist with ADLs, had one unstageable…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-03-31 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview, review of Safety Data Sheets, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to secure potentially hazardous chemicals on the secured memory care unit. This affected 12 (#1, #3, #4, #5, #10, #11, #15, #16, #17, #21, #37, and #43) residents identified by the facility as being cognitively impaired, independently mobile, and residing on the memory care unit. In addition, the facility failed to implement fall interventions as care planned for one (#42) resident of three residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 47. Findings include: 1. Observation on 03/28/22 at 8:50 A.M. of Resident #4's room, located on the secured memory care unit, revealed a full 16 fluid ounce (fl. oz.) bottle of dry mouth rinse with a warning label to keep out of reach of children, and a half-full 7.5 fl. oz. bottle of shampoo and body wash with a warning label to keep out of reach of children on the resident's bedside table. Observation on 03/28/22 at 9:00 A.M. of Resident #28's room, located on the secured memory care unit, revealed a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-03-31 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — pattern
    Provide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to have sufficient dietary staff to perform all dietary functions, including dish washing. This had the potential to affect 45 out of 47 residents who receive meals from the kitchen, the facility identified two (#197 and #198) residents who receive no nutrition from the kitchen. The facility census was 47. Findings include: Observation on 03/28/22 at 7:37 A.M. of the kitchen revealed Dietary Supervisor (DS) #516 and one aide preparing breakfast for the residents. Observation on 03/28/22 at 8:41 A.M. of the memory care unit dining room revealed residents eating breakfast. Breakfast was served in Styrofoam containers. Beverages, with the exception of coffee, was served in Styrofoam cups, and residents had plastic cutlery. Observation on 03/29/22 at 8:43 A.M. of the East Wing breakfast tray service revealed the meals were served in Styrofoam containers, beverages were served in Styrofoam cups, and plastic cutlery was provided to residents. Observation on 03/29/22 at 12:00 P.M. of the East Wing lunch tray service revealed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-03-31 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the facility menu, review of facility documents, observations and resident and staff interview, the facility failed to follow established menus, failed to post menus, substitutions, and alternative menu selections, and failed to maintain a substitution log. This had the potential to affect 45 out of 47 residents who receive meal trays, the facility identified two residents (#197 and #198) residents who receive no nutrition from the kitchen. The facility census was 47. Findings include: 1. Interview on 03/28/22 at 11:32 A.M. of Dietary Supervisor (DS) #516 revealed a substitution was made for the lunch meal. Instead of the listed menu item of oven fried chicken, DS #516 stated she had leftover corned beef and decided to make [NAME] sandwiches and believed the residents would enjoy them. DS #516 stated substitutions were communicated to residents during Coffee Club, which was facilitated by the activities department, and she believed they met each morning. Interview on 03/29/22 at 9:50 A.M. of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-03-31 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to serve meals at appropriate temperatures. This had the potential to affect 45 out of 47 residents who received meal trays, the facility identified two (#197 and #198) residents who did not receive nutrition from the kitchen. The facility census was 47. Findings include: Observation on 03/28/22 at 11:52 A.M. of the kitchen revealed Dietary Supervisor (DS) #516 and Dietary [NAME] (DC) #528 preparing and plating lunch meals into Styrofoam containers for delivery to the Homestead (secured memory care) unit of the facility. The meal consisted of [NAME] sandwiches, macaroni and cheese, and green beans. As each Styrofoam container was prepared, it was placed on a tray on an open, uninsulated meal cart. Pureed meals were prepared and plated into the Styrofoam containers by DS #516 while DC #528 prepared regular textured [NAME] sandwiches on the grill. At 12:23 P.M., the Homestead meal cart was ready for delivery to the unit. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-03-31 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation of alternative menu options, resident and staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to offer residents preferred meal options. This had the potential to affect 45 out of 47 residents who received meal trays, the facility identified two (#197 and #198) residents who received no nutrition from the kitchen. The facility census was 47. Findings include: Interview on 03/28/22 at 2:10 P.M. with Resident #30 revealed the resident did not know she was having a sandwich for lunch and did not like her lunch meal. Resident #30 stated she was not provided with a menu and was unaware of what the lunch meal was. Interview on 03/29/22 at 7:59 A.M. of State Tested Nurse Aides (STNA) #557 and #558 revealed the facility staff did not ask residents about their menu selections. Both STNA's stated, under the previous ownership, residents completed a menu selection each day for their meal preferences, whether it was the main menu selection or an alternative, but that was no longer the practice at the facility. In addition, menus used to be posted by the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-03-31 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to use appropriate hand hygiene when preparing meals. This had the potential to affect 45 out of 47 residents who receive meals from the kitchen, except for two (#197 and #198) residents, identified by the facility as receiving no food by mouth. The facility census was 47. Findings include: Observation on 03/28/22 at 11:52 A.M. of lunch preparation in the kitchen revealed Dietary Supervisor (DS) #516 preparing [NAME] sandwiches. DS #516, with the same gloved hands, touched her hairnet, picked up a can of non-stick spray, sprayed the grill, picked up a sealed package of Swiss cheese, picked up a knife and used it to open the pack of cheese, reached into the plastic bag of a loaf of bread and removed four slices of bread, picked up a brush and buttered the slices of bread, removed cheese slices from the package and placed on the bread, picked up the slices of bread with cheese and walked to the steam and picked up tongs to place corned beef on the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-03-31 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, family and staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to notify the physician when an ordered treatment could could not be provided. This affected one resident (#24) out of one resident reviewed for physician notification. The facility census was 47. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #24 revealed an admission date of 07/03/21 and a readmission date of 11/11/21. Diagnoses included schizoaffective disorder, unspecified dementia, major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, blindness right eye, and urinary tract infection (UTI). Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #24 was severely cognitively impaired and received intermittent catherization (cath). Review of the plan of care revealed Resident #24 had bladder incontinence. Interventions included monitor for signs and symptoms of UTI, including pain, burning, blood tinged urine, cloudiness, no output, and altered mental status.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-03-31 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, resident and family interviews and staff interview the facility failed to ensure resident equipment including, intravenous (IV) poles and wheelchairs, were in safe working order. This affected two (#45 and #24) residents, out of 28 residents reviewed for safe environment. The facility census was 47. Findings include: 1. Record review for Resident #45 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included osteomyelitis, chronic respiratory failure, infection in surgical wound, malnutrition, hernia, pressure ulcer of sacrum stage four, sepsis, and spinal stenosis. Review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #45 had intact cognition, was a one person physical assist with Activities of Daily Living (ADLs), had one unstageable pressure ulcer, one stage III pressure ulcer, and two venous/arterial ulcers. Review of Resident #45's physician orders dated 03/16/22 revealed the resident was to receive Cefepime,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-03-31 · tag F0622 — isolated
    Not transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, record review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to provide discharge documentation to another facility upon discharge of a resident. This affected one resident (#47) of one reviewed for discharge. The facility census was 47. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #47 revealed he was admitted on [DATE] and discharged to another facility on 01/14/22. Diagnoses included vascular dementia with behavioral disturbance, schizophrenia, and type II diabetes mellitus. Review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #47 had impaired cognition. He required limited assistance of one person for bed mobility, supervision of one person for transfers and walking, and required extensive assistance of two people for toileting and hygiene. Review of a nursing progress note dated 01/13/22 revealed the receiving facility requested paperwork to be completed before Resident #47's transfer on 01/14/22. The medical record for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-03-31 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide written transfer notification to residents transferred to the hospital. This affected two (#197 and #49) of three residents reviewed for transfer notices. The facility census was 47. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #197 revealed an admission date of 08/17/21 and a readmission date of 03/23/22. Diagnoses included dysphagia following cerebral infarction (stroke), schizoaffective disorder, hemiplegia and hemiparesis, heart disease, major depressive disorder, pleural effusion, and dementia. Additional review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #197 was severely cognitively impaired. Review of the census revealed Resident #197 was transferred to the hospital on [DATE] and on 03/18/22. Additional review of the medical record revealed no evidence written transfer notices were provided to the resident or her power of attorney (POA) for the transfers on 03/11/22…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-03-31 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident interview, record review, staff interview, review of the admission agreement, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to provide written bed hold notices upon transfer from the facility. This affected three (#45, #49, and #197) of three residents reviewed for hospitalization. The facility census was 47. Findings include: 1. Record review of Resident #45 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Per the record the resident was discharged to the hospital on [DATE] and returned to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses for Resident #45 included osteomyelitis, chronic respiratory failure, infection in surgical wound, malnutrition, hernia, pressure ulcer of sacrum stage four, sepsis, and spinal stenosis. Review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #45 had intact cognition, was a one person physical assist with Activities of Daily Living (ADLs), had one unstageable pressure ulcer, one stage III pressure ulcer, and two…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-03-31 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, resident interview, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to develop comprehensive care plans for ostomy wound care, pressure ulcers, and oxygen. This affected two residents (#25 and #45) out of 28 residents reviewed for care plans. The facility census was 47. Findings include: 1. Record review of Resident #45 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses for Resident #45 included osteomyelitis, chronic respiratory failure, infection in surgical wound, malnutrition, hernia, pressure ulcer of sacrum stage four, sepsis, and spinal stenosis. Review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #45 had intact cognition, was a one person physical assist with Activities of Daily Living (ADLs), had one unstageable pressure ulcer, one stage III pressure ulcer, an ostomy, and two venous/arterial ulcers. Review of Resident #45's admission assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had a pressure ulcer…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-03-31 · tag F0661 — isolated
    Ensure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, record review, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to have complete a discharge summary upon discharge of a resident. This affected one resident (#47) out of one resident reviewed for discharge. The facility census was 47. Review of the medical record for Resident #47 revealed he was admitted on [DATE] and discharged to another facility on 01/14/22. Diagnoses included vascular dementia with behavioral disturbance, schizophrenia, and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Review of the comprehensive minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #47 had impaired cognition. He required limited assistance of one person for bed mobility, supervision of one person for transfers and walking, and required extensive assistance of two people for toileting and hygiene. A review of the medical record for Resident #42 revealed no discharge summary. Interview on 03/31/22 at 10:29 A.M. with the Director of Nursing confirmed there was no discharge summary in Resident #47's record. Review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-03-31 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident and staff interviews, medical record review, review of the facility's shower schedule, and review of policy for personal care, the facility failed to provide showers as scheduled for one resident (Resident #27) of one resident reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL). The facility census was 47. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #27 revealed the resident was admitted [DATE] and with diagnoses including systemic lupus, generalized, bipolar disorder, peripheral vascular disease, chronic kidney disease, neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder, obesity, and major depressive disorder. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment for Resident #27 dated 02/04/22, revealed the resident was cognitively intact and did not reject care. The assessment further revealed Resident #27 required extensive assistance with hygiene and was dependent for bathing. Review of the care plan for Resident #27 revealed an ADL self-care performance deficit related to limited…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-03-31 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to complete wound assessments for one (Resident #45) and failed to provide pressure wound treatments for one (Resident #18) out of three residents reviewed for wound care. The facility census was 47. Findings include: 1. Record review of Resident #45 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses for Resident #45 included osteomyelitis, chronic respiratory failure, infection in surgical wound, malnutrition, hernia, pressure ulcer of sacrum stage four, sepsis, and spinal stenosis. Review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #45 had intact cognition, was a one person physical assist with Activities of Daily Living (ADLs), had one unstageable pressure ulcer, one stage III pressure ulcer, and two venous/arterial ulcers. Review of Resident #45's admission assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had a pressure ulcer on left heel, pressure ulcer on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-03-31 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, review of a dietary meal ticket, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided with physician ordered diets. This affected one (#23) of one residents reviewed for nutrition. The facility census was 47. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #23 revealed an admission date of 06/10/20 and a readmission date of 10/06/20. Diagnoses included end stage renal disease, hypertension, obstructive and reflux uropathy, dependence on renal dialysis, presence of urogenital implants, malignant neoplasm of prostate, and benign prostatic hyperplasia. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 01/13/22, revealed Resident #23 was cognitively intact and was on dialysis. Review of the plan of care, dated 10/19/20, revealed Resident #23 had a nutritional problem or potential nutritional problem related to dependence on hemodialysis, history of malnutrition, acute kidney failure, anemia, and therapeutic diet use. Interventions included serve diet as ordered. Review of current…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-03-31 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to timely review pharmacy recommendations. This affected three (#15, #24, and #28) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The census was 47. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #15 revealed the resident was admitted [DATE] and had diagnoses that included Alzheimer's disease, adjustment disorder with depressed mood, insomnia, generalized anxiety disorder, delusional disorders, cognitive communication deficit, and sexual disorders. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment for Resident #15 revealed the resident had severe cognitive impairment. The assessment indicated Resident #15 exhibited no behaviors. Review of physician orders for Resident #15 revealed they included an order dated 02/25/21, for Cimetidine (an antihistamine and antiacid) 400 milligrams twice daily for sexual behaviors. Review of monthly pharmacy reviews for Resident #15 revealed that on 02/10/22,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-03-31 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, resident and staff interview and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to accurately document the administration of oxygen. This affected one (#25) of one reviewed for oxygen use. The facility census was 47. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #25 revealed an admission date of 08/18/21. Diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease, dementia, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #25 had impaired cognition and required extensive assistance of two people for bed mobility, dressing, and hygiene, and extensive assistance of one person for transfer and toileting. Review of the physician orders for Resident #25 revealed an order dated 12/06/21 for oxygen at two to four liters per minute via nasal cannula every shift. Review of the March 2022 Medication Administration Record (MAR) for Resident #25 revealed staff documented twice daily…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to MAJESTIC CARE — 22 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 52.5-0.5 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.1-1.1 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 51.7-0.7 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.5+0.5 vs chain
The other 21 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.5★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
MDG MAJESTIC OHIO OPERATIONS HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 12/30/2024
MARX, DAVIDIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/31/2024
CHAMBERLAIN, MARGARETIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 09/11/2023
PRUITT, PAULIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 12/30/2024
MAJESTIC MANAGEMENT LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 12/30/2024
MDG MAJESTIC OHIO PROPERTY HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/31/2024
PERRYSBURG OH HEALTH & REHAB REALTY LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/31/2024
STAIFER, DESIREEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/31/2024
ALEXANDER, DAVIDIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/28/2025
REWA, ANGELAIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/28/2025
RUSSELL, ROBERTIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/28/2025
SHATROV, ANZHELIKAIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/28/2025
WOLFE, ERICIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/28/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 19 rows in the source record cover these 13 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$5.7M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-7.0%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$998K
Related-party expense16% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 84%Medicare 3%Other / private 13%

About 84% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $998K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 16% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$305per resident / day
operating cost
$9,265per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$285per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Ohio
$9,186/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,389/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,103/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 365624. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-04-24, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next