Majestic Care Of Whitehall
4805 Langley Avenue, Whitehall, OH 43213 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 150 certified beds · (614) 501-8271 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Oct 2022
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0569)
- it has 1 actual-harm citation
- a high number of inspection citations overall (73) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 1.5% | 5.3% | 15.4% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 5.2% | 6.2% | 5.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.2% | 0.4% | 2.0% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 20.1% | 30.1% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 3.9% | 3.2% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 1.9% | 6.1% | 16.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 24.0% | 25.5% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 99.2% | 94.5% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 4.0% | 3.4% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 12.3% | 21.4% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 7.7% | 8.8% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.2% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 69.2% | 75.6% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 21.7% | 24.9% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 4.3% | 12.9% | 12.0% | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
47.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 33 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.11 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 7% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 11% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 47.1%CMS range 34.1–62.6 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 9.9%CMS range 6.1–16.2 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.09 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 150 beds and averages 127.4 residents a day — about 85% occupied, or roughly 23 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.07 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.40 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.58 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.79 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.19 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.44 to 0.29 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 40% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
73 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 62 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · G2022-10-13 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, resident and staff interviews, review of a Self-Reported Incident (SRI), review of the activity log, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from verbal abuse by another resident. This resulted in actual Psychosocial Harm when Resident #63 was cursed at, physically intimidated, and called inappropriate names by Resident #128 resulting in Resident #63 becoming afraid of Resident #128 and not attending activities or leaving her room for two days following the incident. This affected one (Resident #63) of five residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 128. Findings include: Review of Resident #63's medical record revealed an admission date of 01/25/17. Medical diagnoses included but were not limited to hemiplegia, hemiparesis, anxiety, and depression. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 07/20/22, revealed Resident #63 had moderately impaired cognition. Resident #63 required extensive assistance from two staff for bed mobility and transfers, and supervision for locomotion via…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-06-16 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, review of food temperatures, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure food was served at appetizing temperatures. This affected 19 residents (#100, #101, #102, #103, #104, #105, #106, #107, #108, #109, #110, #111, #112, #113, #114, #115, #116, #117, #118) of 19 residents residing on the 200 short hall. The census was 118. Findings include: Observation on 06/16/2026 at 8:00 A.M. revealed the food cart for the 200 short hall left the kitchen with the test tray. At 8:01 A.M. the food cart arrived to the unit (200 short hall). Trays were passed by facility staff and at 8:11 A.M. the test tray temperatures were obtained and revealed the following: scrambled eggs were 125 degrees Fahrenheit,biscuits and gravy 119 degrees Fahrenheit,cream of wheat 121 degrees Fahrenheit,milk was 46 degrees Fahrenheit; and orange juice was 51 degrees Fahrenheit. The eggs and biscuits and gravy were cold to taste. This was verified by the Dietary Manager #476 at the time of the observation. This deficiency represents non-compliance investigated under Complaint Number 3033233.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-07 · tag F0582 — patternGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents received beneficiary notices. This affected six (Resident #46, #146, #92, #147, #142, and #144) of eight residents reviewed for beneficiary notices. The facility census was 123 residents.Findings include:1) Review of Resident #144's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident #144's census information from 10/21/25 to 10/31/25 revealed Resident #144's payer source was Medicare Part A. Resident #144 was discharged from Medicare Part A services on 10/31/25 with skilled days remaining. Resident #144 remained in the facility beginning 11/01/25.Review of Resident #144's progress notes from 10/21/25 to 10/31/25 revealed no documentation Resident #144 received a Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) or Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notice of Non-Coverage (SNF ABN) prior to Resident #144's discharge from Medicare Part A services on 10/31/25.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-07 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure staff could communicate with a Spanish speaking resident. This affected one (Resident #122) of one resident reviewed for communication. The facility census was 123.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #122 revealed an admission date of 03/20/26 with diagnoses to include but not limited to disseminated malignant neoplasm, secondary malignant neoplasm of the bone and genital organs, ovary, right lung, intraabdominal lymph nodes, retention of urine, neoplasm related to pain, depression, anemia in neoplastic disease, muscle weakness, and unsteadiness on feet.Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident #122 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 14, indicating the resident was cognitively intact Additionally, the MDS for Resident #122 revealed her ethnicity as Mexican and her preferred language as Spanish.Review of the care plan for Resident #122 indicated no focus on Resident #122's primary language as Spanish or interventions for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-07 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to maintain a safe, clean, and homelike environment. This affected one (Resident #113) of five residents reviewed for environment. The facility census was 123.Findings include:Observation on 03/30/26 at 8:37 A.M. of Resident #113's room revealed a hole in the wall about a foot long behind the bed. The dry wall had crumbled into several pieces. Interview at 03/30/26 at 8:37 A.M. with Resident #113 revealed the hole in the wall had been there since he moved to the room about two months ago.Interview on 03/31/26 at 7:25 A.M. with Unit Manager #407 verified the dry wall behind Resident #113's bed was crumbling in the wall and was about one foot long. Unit Manager #407 verified there was another area of the wall near the heating unit which looked like the plaster was coming off the walls and a black substance in the heating unit openings which did not come off when she attempted to remove it. Unit Manager #407 stated the black substance looked like mold in the heating unit. Review of the facility Admissions Packet undated revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-07 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to conduct care planning meetings with the resident and/or their representative. This affected two residents (Resident #104 and #125) of thirty three records sampled. The facility census was 123 residents. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #104's medical record revealed an original admission date of 12/28/22 and a readmission date of 03/26/26. Resident #104 had diagnoses that included metabolic encephalopathy, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following other nontraumatic intracranial hemorrhage affecting left dominant side, and unspecified sequelae of other nontraumatic intracranial hemorrhage. Review of Resident #104's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had severe cognitive impairment and was dependent for toileting, shower/bathe self, upper body dressing, lower body dressing, putting on/taking off footwear, and personal hygiene. Resident #104 was always incontinent of bowel and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-07 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure wound treatments were initiated timely for a resident with a skin alteration. This affected one (Resident #36) of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility census was 123. Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #90 revealed an admission date of 07/17/24 with diagnoses of polyneuropathy, morbid obesity, type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), and lymphedema.Review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #90 is cognitively intact, is dependent on staff for toileting hygiene, and is always incontinent of bowel and bladder.Review of the care plan dated 02/11/26 revealed Resident #90 has impaired skin integrity of the plantar aspect of the third toe. Interventions included assessing and documenting skin condition, completing wound treatment as ordered, and notifying the physician of any worsening wound.Review of the wound assessment report dated 02/11/26 revealed Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and medical records, the facility failed to provide appropriate fall interventions, including placing the bed in a low position and use of a fall mat, for Resident #134. This affected one resident (#134) of the six residents reviewed for accidents. The facility census was 123.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #134 revealed an admission date of 09/10/21 with diagnosis to include but not limited to unspecified sequelae of cerebral infarction, malignant neoplasm of unspecified kidney, vascular dementia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, arteriovenous malformation of cerebra vessels, dorsalgia, major depressive disorder, high risk heterosexual behavior, alcohol abuse, cerebral infarction, alcohol dependence, opioid dependence, restlessness, functional urinary incontinence, anxiety disorder, and psychotic disorder with delusions. Review of the quarterly minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of seven…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-07 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure weekly and daily weights were completed as ordered, failed to notify the physician of significant weight changes, failed to ensure contradictory weight orders were not in place, and failed to ensure reweights were completed timely and orders were transcribed correctly. This affected three residents (Resident #1, Resident #43, and Resident #90) out of seven residents reviewed for nutrition. The facility census was 123.Findings include:1.Review of the medical record for Resident #1 revealed an admission date of 2/27/26 with diagnoses of hemiplegia, metabolic encephalopathy, dysphagia, anoxic brain damage, gastrostomy status, and aphasia.Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #1 was dependent upon staff for activities of daily living, including eating, and received 51 percent or more of total calories and fluid intake via abdominal tube feeding.Review of the care plan initiated 03/08/26 and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-07 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure proper administration of oxygen and failed to ensure a valid physician order was in place for oxygen use. This affected two (Resident #90 and #87) out of three residents reviewed for oxygen administration. The facility census was 123. Findings include: 1.Review of the medical record for Resident #90 revealed an admission date of 07/17/24 with diagnoses of asthma, morbid obesity, edema, lymphedema, muscle weakness, and anxiety. Review of the care plan dated 10/16/24 revealed Resident #90 is at risk for respiratory distress related to asthma. Interventions include administering oxygen as ordered and monitoring oxygen saturation as ordered and as indicated. Review of active physician orders dated 04/01/26 revealed no current orders for oxygen administration. Observation on 03/31/26 at 2:48 P.M. and 4:27 P.M. revealed the resident was receiving oxygen by nasal cannula at five liters per minute. Interview on 03/31/26 at 4:29 P.M. with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-07 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and medication records, the facility failed to appropriately manage pain for Resident #122. This affected one resident (#122) of the three residents reviewed for pain management. The facility census was 123.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #122 revealed an admission date of 03/20/26 with diagnoses to include but not limited to disseminated malignant neoplasm, secondary malignant neoplasm of the bone and genital organs, ovary, right lung, intraabdominal lymph nodes, retention of urine, neoplasm related to pain, depression, anemia in neoplastic disease, muscle weakness, and unsteadiness on feet. Resident #122 spoke Spanish and had limited ability to speak English. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident #122 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status of fourteen which indicated no cognitive impairment. Additionally, the MDS revealed no psychosis, no verbal or physical behaviors, and no rejections of care. Furthermore, the MDS…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 62 citations
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-07 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to address pharmacy recommendations or initiate medication changes in a timely manner. This affected two (Residents #55 and #90) out of five residents reviewed for pharmacy recommendations. The facility census was 123. Findings include:1.Review of the medical record for Resident #90 revealed an admission date of 07/17/24 with diagnoses of insomnia, intellectual disabilities, muscle weakness, constipation, major depressive disorder, neuralgia, and neuritis. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #90 is cognitively intact and is receiving psychotropic drugs. Review of the care plan dated 10/16/24 revealed Resident #90 receives psychotropic medication and is at risk for adverse side effects related to the use of antidepressants, anti anxiety medications, and sleep aids. Interventions include administering medications as ordered by the physician and reviewing quarterly and as needed to maintain the lowest…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, medication administration observation, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure staff administered medication following infection control procedures. This affected one (Resident #73) of four residents reviewed for infection control. The facility census was 123.Review of the medical record for Resident #73 revealed an admission date of 09/06/18 with diagnoses of end stage renal disease, hyperlipidemia, gastroesophageal reflux disease, polyneuropathy, hypertension, heart failure, and paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #73 is cognitively intact and requires set up or clean up assistance with eating. Observation of medication administration on 04/02/26 from 8:16 A.M. to 8:24 A.M. for Resident #73 revealed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #511 began preparation of medications without practicing hand hygiene. Further observation revealed an Eliquis tablet 5 mg…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-02 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure physician appointments were arranged as ordered. This affected one (Resident #16) of four sampled residents. The census was 118. Findings include: Review of Resident #16's medical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, morbid obesity, cirrhosis of the liver, congestive heart failure, anxiety and hypertension. Review of the Annual minimum data set assessment dated [DATE] revealed his cognition was intact. He is continent of his bowel and bladder. Uses a wheelchair for mobility. Requires supervision or touching assistance with oral hygiene, toileting, bathing, dressing and personal hygiene. Review of the physicians orders revealed an order on 11/27/24 for a consult with Central Ohio Urology regarding a staghorn calculus (type of kidney stone with branches that can block urine flow and cause kidney failure) evaluation and treatment and consult Ohio…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-11-06 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain a safe and functional environment when the transition strips (slim strips fitted at the base of doorways to bridge the gap between different floor surfaces or levels) were not in place to level the resident room floor and the hallway floor. This had the potential to affect eight residents (#14, #35, #41, #64 #65, #70, #105, and #115) of 22 residents residing on the [NAME] hallway. The facility census was 118. Findings Include: On 11/04/24 at 9:27 A.M., observations of Resident #14, #35, #41, #64 #65, #70, #105, and #115 rooms revealed the transition strips were missing in the doorway causing an unleveled surface entering and exiting the resident rooms. On 11/06/24 at 12:05 P.M., interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) revealed the facility had removed carpet and replaced with different floor. The facility provided no additional information as to why the transition strips were not replaced.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-06 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure Resident #59 was treated with respect and dignity. This affected one resident (#59) of nine sampled residents. The facility census was 118. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #59 revealed an initial admission date of 10/28/22 with the diagnoses including but not limited to early onset Alzheimer's disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, severe dementia with mood disturbance, psychotic disorder with delusions, major depressive disorder, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, osteoarthritis, mood disorder, sleep disorders, atrial fibrillation, anxiety disorder, insomnia, wandering in diseases, hypothyroidism, constipation, sleep apnea and drug induced secondary Parkinsonism. Review of the plan of care dated 10/28/22 revealed the resident needed assistance with activities of daily living due to impaired mobility, weakness, debility, secondary Parkinsonism, dementia, osteoarthritis, anxiety,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-06 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure Resident #133's physician was notified of a blood pressure outside of the physician ordered parameters. This affected one (Resident #133) of nine sampled residents. The facility census was 118. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #133 revealed an initial admission date of 05/31/24 with the latest readmission of 08/21/24 with the diagnoses including but not limited to end stage renal disease (ESRD), puncture wound with foreign body of thorax, osteonecrosis of multiple sites, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), stenosis of vascular prosthetic devices, implants and grafts, dependence on hemodialysis, renal osteodystrophy, chronic kidney disease (CKD), endocarditis, atrial fibrillation, seasonal allergic rhinitis, bipolar disorder, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, constipation, anemia and nicotine dependence. Review of the plan of care dated 06/07/24 revealed the resident was at risk for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-06 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure sutures were removed as physician ordered for Resident #133. This affected one resident (#133) of nine sampled residents. The facility census was 118. Findings Include: Review of the medical record for Resident #133 revealed an initial admission date of 05/31/24 with the latest readmission of 08/21/24 with the diagnoses including but not limited to end stage renal disease (ESRD), puncture wound with foreign body of thorax, osteonecrosis of multiple sites, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), stenosis of vascular prosthetic devices, implants and grafts, dependence on hemodialysis, renal osteodystrophy, chronic kidney disease (CKD), endocarditis, atrial fibrillation, seasonal allergic rhinitis, bipolar disorder, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, constipation, anemia and nicotine dependence. Review of the resident's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had no cognitive deficit. Review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to maintain appropriate infection control practices during the administration of eye drops to prevent potential infection. This affected one resident (#70) of two residents observed for eye drop administration. The facility census was 118. Findings Include: On 11/04/24 at 9:33 A.M., observation of medication administration revealed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #210 applied (donned) a pair of gloves at the medication administration cart, gathered Resident #70's medications which included a nasal spray and eye drops and entered the resident's room. The LPN assisted Resident #70 to take her oral medications. The LPN then used a tissue and wiped the tip of the Fluticasone 50 micrograms (mcg) nasal spray applicator. The LPN then administered two sprays of the Fluticasone 50 mcg in each nostril. The LPN using the same gloves administered one eye drop in each of the resident's eyes. LPN #210 verified the lack of infection control practices by not washing hands and changing gloves between the Fluticasone…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-02 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain a safe, clean and comfortable environment. This affected two rooms on the 400 unit (room [ROOM NUMBER] and 408). The census was 137. Findings include: 1. On 09/19/24 at 2:35 P.M. observation of room [ROOM NUMBER] revealed a night stand with a drawer missing and finish coming off of it, food debris on floor, the wall had patches of drywall showing and the privacy curtain had dark stains. On 09/23/24 at 8:57 A.M. and 12:00 P.M. observations of room [ROOM NUMBER] revealed a mat to the floor with dark stains, a night stand with a drawer missing and finish coming off of it, there was food debris on floor, the wall had patches of drywall showing and the privacy curtain had dark stains. On 09/25/24 at 3:55 P.M. observations of room [ROOM NUMBER] revealed a mat to the floor with dark stains, a night stand with a drawer missing and finish coming off of it, there was food debris on floor, wall with patches of drywall showing and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-02 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, medical record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living received the necessary services to maintain good nutrition and personal hygiene. This affected three of five residents reviewed for personal hygiene (Residents #9, #24, and #30). The facility census was 137. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #24 revealed an admission date of 08/24/23 and diagnoses including cerebral infarction, diabetes, dysphagia, protein-calorie malnutrition, and malignant neoplasm of the prostate. The resident had physician's orders for a dysphagia advanced texture diet, nectar thickened liquids, and must have one to one supervision for all meals. Review of a Minimum Data Set assessment completed 08/06/24 revealed the resident had range of motion impairment on one side in upper and lower extremity, required substantial/maximal assistance with eating, and was dependent upon staff for personal hygiene and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-02 · tag F0685 — isolatedAssist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on resident interview, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident was provided with proper treatment and assistive devices to maintain vision. This affected one of eight open sampled records reviewed (Resident #55). The facility census was 137. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #55 revealed an admission date of 08/25/22 and a diagnosis of paranoid schizophrenia. A Minimum Data Set assessment completed 06/30/24 indicated the resident wore corrective lenses. The resident had a physician's order 08/25/22 that he may be seen by the optometrist. There was no evidence the resident had been seen by any physician related to his vision since admission. Interview with Resident #55 on 09/17/24 at 11:55 A.M. revealed he needed new glasses. He stated he was unable to see with his current glasses. Interview with Licensed Practical Nurse #168 on 09/19/24 at 10:30 A.M. revealed she was aware that Resident #55 was asking for new glasses. She stated the social worker was supposed to put him on a list to see the eye doctor about a month…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-02 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record review, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident received physician ordered assistance devices to prevent falls. This affected one of three residents reviewed for falls (Resident #89). The facility census was 137. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #89 revealed an admission date of 08/16/24 and diagnoses including cerebral infarction, diabetes, end stage renal disease, and schizophrenia. Review of a Minimum Data Set assessment completed 08/22/24 revealed the resident had intact cognition and required substantial/maximal assistance with transfers. Review of nursing progress notes and incident and accident investigation forms revealed the following incidents noted: On 08/17/24 10:15 A.M.: noted sleeping on floor. Resident is a new admission to the facility and has intermittent periods of confusion. Re-oriented to room and bright color tape applied to call light as reminder. On 08/18/24 10:30 P.M.: noted on floor and having seizure like activity. Hematoma to center of forehead. Sent to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-02 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, review of the infection control log and facility policy and procedure, the facility failed to ensure proper infection control techniques were maintained when providing incontinence care. This affected one resident (#9) observed for incontinence care. The census was 137. Findings include: Review of Resident #9's medical record revealed she was readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the admission minimum data set assessment (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed her cognition was intact. She was dependent on staff for toileting, shower/bathing and required partial to moderate assistance for personal hygiene. The resident was frequently incontinent of urine and always incontinent of bowel. Observation on 09/19/24 at 9:10 A.M. of incontinence care to Resident #9 revealed State Tested Nurses Aide (STNA) #150 used hand sanitizer and prepared water and put on gloves. The STNA provided privacy, washed from side to side and down the middle of the vaginal area,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-02 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident with a gastrostomy tube received the appropriate enteral feeding as ordered by the physician. This affected one of seven open sampled records reviewed (Resident #24). The facility census was 137. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #24 revealed an admission date of 08/24/23 and diagnoses including cerebral infarction, diabetes, dysphagia, protein-calorie malnutrition, and malignant neoplasm of the prostate. The resident had a gastrostomy tube and had physician's orders for an enteral feeding of Glucerna 1.5 calorie at 100 cc's per hour. The enteral feeding was to run from 6:00 P.M. until 6:00 A.M. only. He also received a meal tray during the day. Review of a Minimum Data Set assessment completed 08/06/24 revealed the resident had range of motion impairment on one side in upper and lower extremity, required substantial/maximal assistance with eating, and was dependent upon staff for personal hygiene and transfers. The plan of care dated 12/08/23 stated the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-02 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents were adequately monitored while receiving medications for blood pressure control. This affected two (Residents #71 and #140) of five residents reviewed for medication administration. The census was 137. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #71's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), atrial fibrillation, and hypertension. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 03/14/24, revealed Resident #71 had severe cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #71 current physician orders, dated 04/14/24, revealed he had an order for Metoprolol Succinate ER (beta blocker used to treat heart arrhythmia's and high blood pressure) tablet 50 milligrams (mg) by mouth twice daily. The medication was to be held if his systolic blood pressure was less than 100 or pulse was less that 60. On 07/12/24…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-02 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure medication rates were not five percent or greater. The medication error rate was 10 percent (three errors of 29 opportunities for error). This affected two of five residents observed during medication administration (Residents #8 and #52). The facility census was 137. Findings include: 1. Observations on 09/12/24 at 7:43 A.M. revealed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #208 to administer medications to Resident #8. The resident had a physician's order for Folic Acid 1 milligram daily at 8:00 A.M. as a supplement. The medication was not available to administer. On 09/12/24 at 7:43 A.M. LPN #208 stated she did not know why the medication was not available from the pharmacy and the facility did not have any in stock to give to the resident. She stated she would have to call the pharmacy to determine why the medication was not sent to the facility. 2. Observations on 09/12/24 at 8:05 A.M. revealed LPN #208 to administer medications to Resident #52. The resident was given Guaifenesin 400 milligrams. (A…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-08-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the facility policy, review of the hospital records, review of water temperature logs, record review, American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE) recommendations and Center for Disease Control (CDC) guidance, and interviews with the local health department and staff, the facility failed to maintain a complete and accurate water management program to prevent the spread of Legionella. This affected one (Resident #9) of three residents reviewed for pneumonia and had the potential to affect all 129 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #9 revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of chronic kidney disease stage IV. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment completed 06/30/24 revealed she was cognitively intact and had no shortness of breath. Review of the progress note dated 07/29/24 revealed Resident #9's blood glucose (BG) was 40 earlier and now the BG was 60.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, review of the police report, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision and a safe environment to prevent a resident from recurrent overdosing in the facility. This affected one (Resident #88) of one resident reviewed for safe environment. The facility census was 129. Findings include: Review of Resident #88's medical record revealed an admission date of 05/16/24 with a diagnosis including psychoactive substance abuse. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #88 was cognitively impaired and he can independently ambulate via an electric wheelchair. Resident #88 received antianxiety, antidepressant, and opioid medications. Review of Resident #88's physician orders starting on 05/25/24 revealed an order for Suboxone sublingual film 8-2 milligrams (mg), to be taken one film sublingually once a day for opioid dependence. Review of Resident #88's care plan dated 07/25/24 revealed he exhibited…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-23 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, staff and resident interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to timely provide one resident (#63) with an operating electric wheelchair. This affected one (Resident #63) of three residents reviewed for accomodation of needs. The facility census was 130. Findings include: Medical record review revealed Resident #63 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including right side hemiplegia from a stroke. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #63's cognition was intact. The current care plan revealed the resident required two staff for lift transfers to his wheelchair. Interview and observation with Resident #63 on [DATE] at 7:12 A.M. revealed he had an electric wheelchair that was not working, but he would like to use this wheelchair instead of a standard wheelchair. Observation of the resident's room revealed the electric wheelchair was in the resident's bathroom not charging and the resident was in bed. Interview with Therapy…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-23 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record reviews, review of a Self-Reported Incident investigation, policy review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to timely notify the responsible party and physician of an elopement incident from the secured unit for Resident #4. This affected one (#4) of three residents reviewed for elopement. The facility census was 130. Findings include: Medical record review revealed Resident #4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia, psychosis, and anxiety. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #4 had severely impaired cognition and was ambulatory. Review of an elopement assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #4 had no elopement history, was exit seeking, wandered, and resided on the secured unit. Review of a Self-Reported Incident involving the elopement of a different resident (#6) on 06/30/24 revealed the next day on 07/01/24 when investigating it was discovered that Resident #4 also got out of the secured…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record reviews, review of a Self-Reported Incident (SRI) investigation, policy review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure staff provided adequate supervision to prevent a resident, with altered mental status and exhibited exit seeking behaviors, from leaving the facility unsupervised. This affected one (Resident #6) of three residents reviewed for elopement. The facility census was 130. Findings include: Medical record review revealed Resident #6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included Alzheimer's dementia and anxiety. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #6 had severely impaired cognition and was ambulatory. Review of the elopement assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #6 had no elopement history, wandered aimlessly, was exit seeking, and resided on the secured unit. Review of the facilities Self-Reported Incident investigation revealed an allegation of neglect was reported to the State Survey Agency.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-23 · tag F0712 — isolatedEnsure that the resident and his/her doctor meet face-to-face at all required visits.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record reviews, policy review, and interviews with residents, staff, and physician, the facility failed to provide a resident with timely physician services. This affected one (Resident #115) of seven residents reviewed for physician services. The facility census was 130. Findings include: Medical record review revealed Resident #115 was admitted [DATE] with diagnoses including cirrhosis of the liver, emotional distress, and generalized pain. Review of the resident's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #115 had intact cognition. Resident #115's physician was Physician #70. Further review of the medical record revealed the resident's most recent examination from Physician #70 was on 05/07/24. Resident #115 was not seen by a physician assistant, nurse practitioner, or clinical nurse specialist from 05/07/24 to 07/22/24. Interview with Resident #115 on 07/22/24 at 10:30 A.M. revealed Physician #70 had not examined him in 11 weeks and he had concerns about…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-06-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on personnel record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to administer and read tuberculin (TB) tests for newly hired staff as required. This had the potential to affect all 126 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: 1. Review of State Tested Nursing Aides (STNA) #644's personnel file revealed a hire date of 03/01/24. STNA #644 received the first step of TB skin test on 02/23/24 to the left forearm by with the negative results being read on 02/26/24. STNA #644 received the second step of TB skin test on 03/13/24 to the left forearm with no dated results available or recorded on STNA #644's Employee Immunization Record. Interview on 06/13/24 at 2:30 P.M. with Human Resource (HR) #720 confirmed STNA #644's second step TB skin test results were not recorded on the Employee Immunization Records for STNA #644. 2. Review of STNA #589's personnel file revealed a hire date of 06/14/23. STNA #589 received the first step of TB skin test on 06/06/23 to the right forearm with the negative results being read on 06/08/23. STNA #589 received…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-18 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on resident and staff interviews, observations, and review of the facility policy, the facility did not maintain a safe and sanitary living environment for the residents who utilized the common area refrigerators. This had the potential to affect all residents in the facility except for the 22 residents residing on the memory care unit. The facility census was 126. Findings include: Interview on 06/10/24 at 10:46 A.M. with Resident #113 stated he attempted to use the resident refrigerator for a personal food item. He stated there was no room in it and there were flies and gnats in it, and it was not clean. He stated it was the refrigerator in the activities area located on the 200 Hall. Observation on 06/10/24 at 11:02 A.M. of the refrigerator on the 200 hall activity area revealed there was no temperature log and a sign was posted on the front of it stating it was a resident refrigerator and to date all items. Inside the refrigerator, there was a spilled drink on the ground, it was full of undated food from various restaurants and grocery bags with mold-like substance on the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-18 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, review of manufacture guidelines, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to remove two expired vials of Tubersol (tuberculin (TB) solution) from circulation. This had the potential to affect 66 residents who the facility identified were new admits to the facility in the last six months. The facility census was 126. Findings include: Observation on [DATE] at 8:35 A.M. revealed an opened partially used multiple dose of TB solution with the lot number 68154 and expiration date of [DATE]. The vial was in a plastic container without the original packaging box inside the refrigerator of the 300-hallway medication storage room. There was no open as of date written on the vial and no instruction on how to administer the solution. Interview on [DATE] at 8:45 A.M. with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #510 confirmed the opened vial of TB solution, found in the 300-hallway medication storage room refrigerator, was without an open as of date written on the vial. LPN #510…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-06-18 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — patternMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on resident and staff interviews, observations, review of the facility's pest invoices, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed maintain effective pest control within the facility. This affected three residents (#7, #96, and #113) and had the potential to affect all residents in the facility except for the 22 residents residing on the memory care unit. The facility census was 126. Findings include: 1. Interview on 06/11/24 at 10:46 A.M. with Resident #113 revealed he attempted to use the resident refrigerator in the activities area located on the 200 Hall for a personal food item but there were flies and gnats inside of the refrigerator. Observation on 06/10/24 at 11:02 A.M. of the fridge on the 200 hall activity area revealed when opened, there were gnats and flies coming out it. Observation and interview on 06/10/24 at 11:12 A.M. with the Administrator verified there were flies and gnats inside the refrigerator on the 200 hall activity area. 2. Observation on 06/10/24 at 9:49 A.M. of Resident #7's room revealed the residents room had multiple flies and gnats…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-18 · tag F0569 — isolatedNotify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide notice to residents and or resident representative when the resident funds account reached $200 less than the Supplemental Security Income (SSI) resource limit for one person. This affected three (Residents #14, #55, and #87) of five residents reviewed for resident funds. The facility census was 126 residents. Findings include: Review of the medical records for Residents #14, #55, and #87 revealed they have Medicaid as a payor source. Review of the Resident Fund account for Resident #14 revealed on 04/29/24, the balance was $2,140.02. The balance remained at or above $2,110.02 through 06/13/24. Resident #14 did not receive a spend down notification until 06/03/24. Review of the Resident Fund account for Resident #55 revealed on 04/03/24, the balance was $2,242.31. The balance remained at or above $2,159.31 through 05/20/24. Resident #55 did not receive a spend down notification until 06/03/24. Review of the Resident Fund account for Resident #87 revealed that on 12/01/23, the balance was $3,234.71. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-18 · tag F0622 — isolatedNot transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility failed to assess, document, and complete a transfer of a resident to the hospital for evaluation and treatment. This affected one (Resident #123) of one resident reviewed for hospitalizations. The facility census was 126. Findings include: Review of Resident #123's medical record revealed an admission date of 05/04/24 with diagnoses including Parkinson's disease, atrial fibrillation, type two diabetes mellitus, and chronic pain syndrome. Resident #123 had intact cognition and was able to make needs known. Resident #123 was discharged to the hospital on [DATE] for unknown reason. Review of Resident #123's baseline care plan dated 05/04/24 revealed Resident #123 required assistance for discharge planning. Review of the vital sign listing dated 05/06/23 at 10:40 A.M. revealed Resident #123's pain level was three out of ten. Review of the physician's order dated 05/06/24 at 1:45 P.M. by Physician #710 revealed an order to send Resident #123 to the emergency…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-18 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observations, resident and staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents who smoked had a personalized smoking care plan. This affected two (Residents #94 and #113) of the two residents reviewed for smoking. The facility census was 126. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #94 revealed an admission date of 09/20/21. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, acute and chronic respiratory failure, cognitive impairment, and long term, current use of opiate analgesic. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #94 had intact cognition for daily decision making abilities. Review of the Safe Smoking Review dated 06/10/24 revealed Resident #94 was not a cigarette/Tobacco smoker, Resident #94 smokes recreational marijuana intermittently. Educated on safe smoking practices and smoking policy provided, and resident agreeable. Review of the progress note dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-18 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to provide a resident who required assistance from staff with activities of daily living (ADL) adequate assistance with eating. This affected one (Resident #56) of four residents reviewed for ADLs. The facility census was 126. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #56 revealed an admission date of 09/09/21. Diagnoses included polyneuropathy, diabetes mellitus type two, chronic kidney disease, psychotic disorder hallucinations, adult failure to thrive, protein calorie malnutrition, and heart failure. Review of Resident #56's care plan last revised on February 2024 revealed Resident #56 was nutritional risk related to mechanically altered diet, abnormal labs, diuretic therapy, refusals to eat, and vitamin deficiency, behaviors such as refusal of care and hallucinations, failure to thrive and malnutrition with hospice care, oral health and dental problems due to missing teeth, chronic pain…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-18 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to complete accurate pressure ulcer assessments. This affected one (Resident #24) of the three residents reviewed for pressure ulcer care. The facility census was 126. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #24 revealed a re-entry date of 11/20/18. Diagnoses included multiple sclerosis, reduced mobility, contracture in left and right knee, and colostomy status. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #24 had intact cognition for daily decision making abilities. Resident #24 was noted to experience an impairment to bilateral lower extremities. Resident #24 was noted to have two stage three pressure ulcers (Full thickness tissue loss. Subcutaneous fat may be visible but bone, tendon or muscle is not exposed.) which were noted to be facility acquired and two stage four pressure ulcers (Full thickness tissue loss with bone, tendon or muscle. Slough of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-18 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolatedProvide appropriate foot care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interview, review of the facility policy, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident received treatment and care for good foot health. This affected one (Resident #99) of one resident reviewed for podiatry. The facility census was 126 residents. Findings include: Medical record review revealed Resident #99 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included dementia, type II diabetes mellitus, and Alzheimer's disease. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #99 was severely impaired cognition. Resident #99 was dependent on staff for personal hygiene. Review of Resident #99's comprehensive care plan revealed the resident was at risk for complications due to diabetes mellitus. Interventions listed on her care plan included seeing a podiatrist for routine and as needed foot care, and a skin inspection weekly, paying particular attention to the feet. Review of Resident #99's weekly skin assessments dated 06/03/24 and 06/10/24 revealed no…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observations, resident and staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents were evaluated for safe smoking and provide adequate supervision and monitoring of residents who smoke. This affected two (Resident #94 and #113) of two residents reviewed for safe smoking. The facility census was 126. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #94 revealed an admission date of 09/20/21. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, acute and chronic respiratory failure, cognitive impairment, and long term, current use of opiate analgesic. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #94 had intact cognition for daily decision making abilities. Review of the Safe Smoking Review dated 06/10/24 revealed Resident #94 was not a cigarette/Tobacco smoker, Resident #94 smokes recreational marijuana intermittently. Educated on safe smoking practices and smoking policy provided, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-18 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, resident and staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure a resident had physician orders for oxygen administration. This affected one (Resident #94) of three residents reviewed for respiratory care. The facility census was 126. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #94 revealed an admission date of 09/20/21. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and acute and chronic respiratory failure. Review of Resident #94's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #94 had intact cognition. Review of the physician orders for Resident #94 revealed Resident #94 did not have any routine or as needed orders for oxygen administration. Resident #94 had orders dated 01/08/24 to apply two liters of oxygen at night for sleep apnea. Observation on 06/10/24 at 11:58 A.M. revealed Resident #94 sitting in the facility's courtyard with a oxygen tank on the back of his…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-18 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interviews, review of hospital records, and policy review, the facility failed to properly assess and treat Resident #11's pain after a fall with major injury. This affected one (#11) of two residents reviewed for pain management. The facility census was 126. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #11 revealed an admission date of 08/04/16. Diagnoses included restlessness, agitation, and dementia. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #11 had memory problems and required assistance from staff with transferring. Review of Resident #11's active care plan revealed the resident was at risk for acute and/or chronic pain with an intervention to observe for symptoms of non-verbal pain which included: changes in breathing, vocalizations, mood/behavior, eyes, face and body signs and symptoms. Review of the progress note dated 05/25/24 at 8:05 A.M. revealed Resident #11 was on the floor. Resident #11 stated she was trying to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-18 · tag F0699 — isolatedProvide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, and staff interview, this facility failed to ensure residents with a diagnosis of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) had the appropriate assessment and documented triggers regarding this diagnosis. This affected three (Residents #33, #92, and #104) of five residents reviewed for emotional needs and behaviors. The facility census was 126. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #33 revealed an initial admission date of 12/19/20 with a re-entry date of 04/04/22. Diagnosis included PTSD. Review of Resident #33's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #33 had intact cognition for daily decision making abilities with no behaviors noted. Resident #33 was noted to receive antipsychotic and antidepressants daily. Review of the plan of care last revised on 03/29/22 revealed Resident #33 had a diagnosis of anxiety, PTSD, and major depressive disorder. Resident #33 reports that she continuously struggles with symptoms of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-18 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 3. Review of the medical record for Resident #83 revealed an admission date of 02/04/22. Medical diagnosis included hypertensive heart disease with heart failure. Review of quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 05/01/24, revealed Resident #83 had severely impaired cognition. Review of Resident #83's physicians orders revealed an order dated 03/25/24 for hydralazine (a medication to lower blood pressure) 30 milligrams (mg) by mouth three times daily. The order included parameters to hold for a systolic blood pressure less than 100 or a heart rate greater than 100 beats per minute. Review of Resident #83's April 2024, May 2024, and June 2024 Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed no correlating blood pressure or heart rate documented prior to medication administration. Review of Resident #83's electronic medical record contained no evidence that his blood pressure or heart rate was monitored prior to being administered his three times daily hydralazine. An interview on 06/13/24 at 8:51 A.M.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-18 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolatedImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, review of the facility's infection control log, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide adequate justification and monitoring regarding the use of an antibiotic. This affected one (Resident #38) of five residents reviewed for medications. The facility census was 126. Findings include: Medical record review revealed Resident #38 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and acute and chronic respiratory failure. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 03/06/24, revealed Resident #38 was cognitively intact. Review of Resident #38's physician orders, dated 12/07/23, revealed the resident was prescribed and administered Azithromycin (antibiotic) 500 milligrams (mg) every Monday, Wednesday, and Friday for prophylactic. There was no evidence of monitoring the effectiveness of the antibiotic and no evidence of justification for the use of the antibiotic. Review of the facility's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-10-13 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — widespreadReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of infection control records, observation, staff and resident interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure to residents were permitted to eat in the dining room. This affected two (Resident #12 and #17) of two residents reviewed for dining services. This had the potential to affect all 128 residents in the facility who receive meals from the kitchen. The census was 128. Findings include: Review of the infection control records for COVID-19 revealed the last case of COVID-19 was on 09/15/22. Observations on 09/26/22 from 8:00 A.M. to 8:30 A.M. and 12:00 P.M. to 12:30 P.M., and on 09/27/22 from 8:00 A.M. to 8:30 A.M. and 12:00 P.M. to 12:30 P.M., revealed no residents were in the dining room eating meals. Interview with Resident #12 on 09/28/22 at 8:42 A.M. revealed every time there was an outbreak of COVID-19 the dining room was closed. The interview further revealed the dining room had remained closed and she would like to participate in dining services. Interview with Resident #17 on 09/28/22 at 11:49 A.M. revealed she would like to go to the dining…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2022-10-13 · tag F0850 — failed to provide social-work services — widespreadHire a qualified full-time social worker in a facility with more than 120 beds.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff and resident interviews, review of the facility handbook, review of timesheets, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a qualified social worker was on-site full-time when the facility had greater than 120 beds. This had the potential to affect all 128 residents who resided in the facility. The census was 128. Findings include: Interview on 09/27/22 at 8:38 A.M. with Resident #32 revealed the facility did not have a full-time social worker on-site. Resident #32 stated a social worker was on-site two days a week. Interview on 09/28/22 at 11:15 A.M. with the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) and Regional Nurse (RN) #420 revealed the facility's social worker recently walked out on the job without notice. The facility had two interim social workers who were on-site at the facility three to four days per week between the two of them. Interview on 09/29/22 at 1:18 P.M. with Social Services (SS) #501 revealed she and SS #500 were the interim social workers for the facility. SS #501 stated she was on-site two days a week. The previous full-time social worker…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-10-13 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — patternAllow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff and resident interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure care conferences were provided for residents. This affected five (Resident #32, #41 #48, #56, and #86) of five residents reviewed for care conferences. The census was 128. Findings include: 1. Medical record review for Resident #86 revealed an admission date of 04/19/22. Medical diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and bipolar disease. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 07/28/22, revealed Resident #86 was cognitively intact. Review of the medical record for Resident #86 revealed there was no care conference held with the resident upon admission or quarterly. Interview with Resident #86 on 09/26/22 at 1:16 P.M. revealed she couldn't remembers if she had been invited to or attended a care conference. Interview with the Administrator and Regional Nurse #420 on 09/28/22 at 11:15 A.M. confirmed there was no evidence of quarterly care conferences with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-10-13 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, resident and staff interviews, review of incident reports, review of Self-Reported incidents (SRIs), and facility policy review, the facility failed to implement their abuse policies and procedures. This affected four (Residents #63, #72, #93 and former Resident #128) of six residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 128. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #72 revealed an admission date on 03/09/20. Medical diagnoses included unspecified dementia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), unspecified psychosis, alcohol abuse, and alcoholic cirrhosis of liver. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #72 had mild cognitive impairment. Resident #72 required limited assistance from one staff to complete activities of daily living (ADLs). No behaviors were noted in the assessment. Review of the quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #72 had severely impaired cognition. Resident #72…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-10-13 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — patternTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, resident and staff interviews, review of incident reports, review of Self-Reported incidents (SRIs), and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure allegations of abuse were reported to the state survey agency. This affected four (Residents #63, #72, #93, and former Resident #128) of six residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 128. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #72 revealed an admission date on 03/09/20. Medical diagnoses included unspecified dementia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), unspecified psychosis, alcohol abuse, and alcoholic cirrhosis of liver. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #72 had mild cognitive impairment. Resident #72 required limited assistance from one staff to complete activities of daily living (ADLs). No behaviors were noted in the assessment. Review of the quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #72 had severely impaired…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-10-13 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — patternRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, resident and staff interviews, review of incident reports, review of Self-Reported incidents (SRIs), and facility policy review, the facility failed to timely investigate allegations or suspected incidents of abuse. This affected four (Residents #63, #72, #93, and former Resident #128) of six residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 128. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #72 revealed an admission date on 03/09/20. Medical diagnoses included unspecified dementia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), unspecified psychosis, alcohol abuse, and alcoholic cirrhosis of liver. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #72 had mild cognitive impairment. Resident #72 required limited assistance from one staff to complete activities of daily living (ADLs). No behaviors were noted in the assessment. Review of the quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #72 had severely impaired…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-10-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided appropriate supervision while smoking. This affected one (#49) out of three residents reviewed for accidents. Additionally, the facility failed to provide safe smoking areas. This had the potential to affect all 36 residents (#1, #5, #12, #13, #14, #16, #19, #20, #23, #28, #30, #31, #33, #34, #37, #45, #49, #52, #55, #61, #62, #64, #71, #80, #81, #83, #86, #93, #98, #101, #104, #122, #126, #128, #129, and #130) identified by the facility who smoke. The census was 128. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #49 revealed an admission date of 01/11/22 and diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), hemiplegia and hemiparesis, congestive heart failure (CHF), and nicotine dependence. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 07/05/22, revealed Resident #49 had impaired cognition. Review of the nurses notes, dated 07/16/22 at 11:51 A.M., revealed Resident #49 was found in the smoking…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-10-13 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, staff and resident interview, review of the daily staffing sheet and time punches, review of the activity calendar, review of participation logs, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure there was sufficient nursing staff to meet the residents needs. This affected one (#41) of one reviewed for activities and had the potential to affect all 45 residents on the 200 hall (#3, #7, #8, #12, #17, #18, #19, #22, #23, #26, #28, #32, #34, #40, #41, #42, #46, #48, #50, #56, #57, #60, #68, #74, #79, #81, #85, #86, #87, #88, #93, #94, #96, #97, #100, #109, #110, #114, #116, #118, #121, #122, #127, #129, and #382). This also affected one (#37) of five residents reviewed for activities of daily living and had the potential to affect all 21 residents who resided on the 300 hall (#1, #6, #9, #14, #25, #31, #36, #53, #55, #61, #62, #65, #70, #84, #99, #104, #105, #107, #112, #119, and #125). The census was 128. Findings include: 1. Medical record review for Resident #41 revealed an admission date of 06/08/22. Medical diagnoses included chronic obstructive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-10-13 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, staff and resident interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to properly store and label medication as well as ensure medication was not expired. This affected two (#9 and #105) residents and had the potential to affect six residents (#2, #10, #13, #95, #112, and #285) with medications stored in the 100 hall medication storage room refrigerator, four residents (#18, #46, #81, and #85) who received medication from the 200 Short Hall medication cart, and 11 residents (#9, #25, #31, #53, #55, #61, #66, #70, #99, #112, and #119) who received medications from the 300 hall medication cart. The facility census was 128. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #105 revealed an admission date of 08/29/22. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, end stage renal disease, and renal dialysis dependent. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) Medicare five day assessment revealed Resident #105 was cognitively intact. Review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-10-13 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of beneficiary notices, the facility failed to provide the appropriate beneficiary notices (Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage and Advanced Beneficiary Notice) to three residents. This affected three (Residents #44, #92, and #115) of three residents reviewed for beneficiary notices. The facility census was 128. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #44 revealed an admission date on 03/11/22. Medical diagnoses included chronic hepatic failure without coma, Type II Diabetes Mellitus with hyperglycemia, unspecified viral hepatitis C, and muscle weakness. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #44 had intact cognition. Resident #44 required supervision to limited assistance from one to two staff to complete activities of daily living (ADLs). Review of the beneficiary notices list from the last six months revealed Resident #44 was cut from Medicare Part A therapy services on 05/30/22 and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-10-13 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff and resident interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a homelike environment was provided for residents. This affected one (#9) out of 128 residents reviewed during the screening process. The census was 128. Findings include: Observation on 09/27/22 at 11:00 A.M. revealed Resident #9 was sitting in bed with only a shirt on and looking out his window which had window blind that was not down and the window overlooked the parking lot. Interview on 09/28/22 at 3:02 P.M. with Resident #9 revealed his window blind was broken and would not go down. Resident 9 stated his window was overlooking the parking lot. Resident #9 stated the shower curtain was hanging and broken in the shower in his room. Resident #9 stated maintenance was aware of his window blind and shower curtain however maintenance had never come back to fix either. Observation on 09/28/22 at 3:10 P.M. revealed Resident #9's window blind would not go down. The window blind was open roughly 18 inches from the window ledge. Unit Manager #318 tried to pull the window blind…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-10-13 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, review of Pre-admission Screening and Resident Reviews (PASARRs), and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure an updated PASSAR was completed after a resident experienced a significant change or was diagnosed with a newly evident serious mental disorder. This affected three (Residents #7 #48, and #110) of six residents reviewed for PASARR screenings. The facility census was 128. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #7 revealed an admission date on 09/15/20. Medical diagnoses included vascular dementia with behavioral disturbance (09/15/20), psychotic disorder (06/01/21), major depressive disorder (12/07/21), anxiety disorder (12/07/21), and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) (12/21/15). Review of Resident #7's current physician orders dated September 2022 revealed Resident #7 had orders for the following psychotropic medications: Mirtazapine (antidepressant medication) 15 milligrams (mg) daily at bedtime for depression…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-10-13 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure Pre-admission Screening and Resident Reviews (PASARR) were completed timely. This affected one (Resident #41) of six residents reviewed for PASARR screenings. The facility census was 128. Findings include: Medical record review for Resident #41 revealed an admission date of 06/08/22. Medical diagnoses included schizoaffective disorder. Review of quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 09/13/22, revealed Resident #41 was cognitively intact. Review of Resident #41's medical record revealed there was not a PASARR completed upon admission. Interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 09/27/22 at 3:30 P.M. confirmed Resident #41 did not have a PASARR completed upon admission and a PASSAR should have been completed. Review of the policy entitled Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review dated 08/01/20 revealed the purpose of Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) is to identify the best services and location for residents and/or those considering admission…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-10-13 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, and resident interview, the facility failed to get ensure residents who were dependent on staff assistance for activities of daily living were provided assistance with getting out of bed. This affected one (#37) out of four residents reviewed who were dependent on staff assistance for activities of daily living. The census was 128. Findings include: Review of medical record for Resident #37 revealed an admission date of 01/12/21. Diagnoses included hemiplegia and hemiparesis following a cerebral infarction, and dementia. Review of the Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 09/13/22, revealed Resident #37 was cognitively impaired. Resident #37 required extensive two-person physical assist with bed mobility, transfers, toilet use, bathing, and personal hygiene. Resident required extensive one-person physical assist for eating. Resident #37 used a wheelchair to ambulate in the facility. Resident #37 was able to use her voice to speak very softly, but most of the time pointed with hands, answered with a head shake, or voiced…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-10-13 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolatedProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, staff and resident interview, review of a activity calendar, review of participation records, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure activities were provided to meet the needs/interests of the residents. This affected one (#41) of one resident reviewed for activities. The census was 128. Findings include: Medical record review for Resident #41 revealed an admission date of 06/08/22. Medical diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, schizoaffective disorder, and diabetes. Review of the activity evaluation, dated 07/11/22, revealed it was somewhat important for Resident #41 to have books, newspaper, and magazines to read, to listen to music she liked, to be around animals, keep up with the news, do things with groups of people, and do favorite activities. It was very important to participate in religious services or practices. Review of the September 2022 activity calendar revealed church services were scheduled for 09/04/22 at 3:00 P.M. Review of the participation log, dated 09/04/22, revealed Resident #41's name was not on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-10-13 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure wound treatments were completed according to physician orders. This affected two (#9 and #56) of seven residents reviewed for wound treatments. The census was 128. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #9 revealed an admission on [DATE]. Diagnoses included cellulitis of the right lower limb, erythema intertrigo, non-pressure chronic ulcer of unspecified part of lower leg with severity, lymphedema, and obesity. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #9 was cognitively intact. Resident #9 required supervision and setup help for bed mobility, transfers, dressing, eating, toilet use, personal hygiene, and bathing. Review of the plan of care, dated 02/08/22, revealed Resident #9 was at risk for refusing treatments and medications at times. Interventions included administer medications as ordered, allow resident to vent feelings, approach…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-10-13 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, medical record review, staff and resident interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure pressure ulcer interventions and treatments were initiated timely. This affected two residents (#29 and #106) out of six residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility identified six residents with pressure ulcers. The census was 128. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #29 revealed an admission date of 04/06/15 and the diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), cerebral infarction, and spastic hemiplegia. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 08/28/22, revealed Resident #29 required extensive two staff assistance for bed mobility, personal hygiene and toilet use. The assessment indicated Resident #29 had two stage four pressure ulcers. Review of the care plan, dated 08/28/18, revealed Resident #29 was at risk for skin breakdown related to decreased mobility, weakness, and moderate protein calorie malnutrition with interventions to provide treatments as ordered and monitor for skin breakdown. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-10-13 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure nutritional supplements were provided as ordered and weights were obtained as ordered. This affected one (#58) of four residents reviewed for nutrition. The facility identified there were 19 residents with unplanned significant weight loss. The census was 128. Findings include: Medical record review for Resident #58 revealed an admission date of 04/01/22. Medical diagnoses included diabetes, renal insufficiency, and non-Alzheimer's dementia. Review of Resident #58's weights revealed Resident #58 weighed 174.8 pounds on 04/01/22. Further review of the weights revealed Resident #58 weighed 151.0 pounds on 09/26/22. Review of quarterly Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE], revealed Resident #58 was severely cognitively impaired. Resident #58 required supervision with eating. Review of Resident #58's care plan dated 07/21/22 revealed Resident #58 was at risk for malnutrition related chronic disease with noted…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-10-13 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents who utilized oxygen had a physician order for oxygen. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure oxygen tubing was dated. This affected two (#60 and #86) of two residents reviewed for respiratory care. The facility identified 20 residents who received oxygen therapy. The census was 128. Findings include: 1. Medical record review for Resident #86 revealed an admission date of 04/19/22. Medical diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and bipolar disease. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #86 was cognitively intact. Review of Resident #86's physician orders since 04/19/22 revealed there was no order for oxygen. Observation of Resident #86 on 09/26/22 at 1:27 P.M. revealed she used oxygen and her tubing was not dated. Observation on 09/27/22 at 2:28 P.M. revealed Resident #86's oxygen tubing was not dated. Interview…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-10-13 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents received appropriate dialysis management services. This affected two residents (#105 and #106) out of two residents reviewed for dialysis. The facility identified 11 residents who received dialysis services. The census was 128. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #106 revealed an admission date of 08/29/22 and the diagnoses of diabetes type two, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), end stage renal disease (ESRD), dependence on renal dialysis, and heart failure (HF). Review of the care plan, dated 10/03/22, revealed Resident #106 required hemodialysis due to ESRD and was to receive in house dialysis with intervenitons to assess bruit and thrill every shift, do not draw blood or take blood pressure in arm with graft, and administer medications as ordered. Prior to 10/03/22, there were no care planned interventions to address Resident #106's dialysis services. Review of Resident #106's physician orders new orders were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-10-13 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than five percent (%). Out of 29 opportunities, three errors were observed which equaled an error rate of 10.34%. This affected one (Resident #48) out of three residents observed during medication administration. The census was 128. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #48 revealed an admission date of 04/13/22 and the diagnoses of acute respiratory failure with hypoxia. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 07/05/22, revealed Resident #48 had the diagnoses of respiratory failure. Review of Resident #48's care plan, dated 10/03/22, revealed he was at risk for respiratory distress related to other acute respiratory failure with hypoxia with interventions to administer medications as ordered. Review of Resident #48's physician orders revealed orders for Artificial Tears Solution 0.5-0.6% (Polyvinyl Alcohol-Povidone) with instructions to instill two drops in both eyes four times a day for dry…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-10-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure an indwelling Foley catheter was cleaned in accordance with proper infection control procedures. This affected one (#56) of one resident reviewed for catheter care. The facility identified there were four residents in the facility with catheters. The census was 128. Findings include: Medical record review for Resident #56 revealed an admission date of 08/03/16. Medical diagnoses included multiple sclerosis, neurogenic bladder, and paraplegia. Review of the care plan, dated 03/11/20, revealed Resident #56 had an alteration in elimination related to a Foley catheter. Her diagnoses was neurogenic bladder. Her interventions were to provide Foley catheter care per orders and routine. Review of physician orders, dated 09/29/21, revealed Foley catheter care was to be provided every shift and as needed. Review of quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 07/12/22, revealed Resident #56 was cognitively intact. Observation of catheter care on 09/29/22 at 1:08 P.M. revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Ccited before2024-06-18 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — widespreadDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on personnel file review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure new hired staff had reference checks completed prior to employment. This had the potential to affect all 126 residents residing at the facility. Finding include: Review of the personnel files for Registered Nurse (RN) #575, #641, #628, State Tested Nursing Assistant (STNA) #589, #644, Business Office Manager (BOM) #610, and Social Services Director (SSD) #656 revealed these staff members did not have any reference checks completed prior to being hired. Interview on 06/13/2024 at 3:10 P.M. with Human Resources (HR) #720 confirmed reference check was part of the new hire process and was required to be available in each employees personal file. HR #720 confirmed RN #575, RN #641, RN #628, STNA #589, STNA #644, BOM #610 and SSD #656 did not have reference checks completed prior to being hired. Review of the facility's undated policy titled Abuse Prevention Program revealed the facility conducts employee background checks per state and federal regulations.
- No harm found · C2024-06-18 · tag F0730 — widespreadObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide evidence of the completion of nurse aide performance reviews. This affected two State Tested Nursing Assistants (STNAs) out of four STNA personnel files reviewed and had the potential to affect all 126 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: Review of STNA #441's personnel file revealed STNA #441 was initially hired on 10/26/11 with a previous healthcare provider of the facility. STNA #441's hire date for the current healthcare provider of the facility was 04/26/19. STNA #441's annual performance evaluation was not available for review. Review of STNA #578's personnel file revealed STNA #578's hire date of 05/05/23. STNA #578 had a 90-day evaluation completed on 11/01/23. STNA #578's annual evaluation was not available to be reviewed and there was no evidence to prove the annual evaluation had been completed. Interview on 06/13/24 at 2:30 P.M. with Human Resources (HR) staff #720 confirmed STNA #441's annual evaluation was not available for review and there was no evidence to prove they had been…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-09-18 for 29 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to MAJESTIC CARE — 22 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 3 of 5 | 2.5 | +0.5 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.1 | -0.1 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 1.7 | +0.3 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 4.5 | +0.5 vs chain |
The other 21 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.5★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MARX, DAVID | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 100% | since 01/01/2019 |
| CHAMBERLAIN, MARGARET | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 09/11/2023 |
| MAJESTIC MANAGEMENT LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/29/2019 |
| ALEXANDER, DAVID | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/01/2023 |
| BOYD, RONDEL | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/02/2024 |
| MILLER, DANIEL | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2025 |
| PRUITT, PAUL | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/01/2023 |
| REWA, ANGELA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/23/2023 |
| RUSSELL, ROBERT | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/08/2024 |
| SHATROV, ANZHELIKA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/02/2024 |
| WOLFE, ERIC | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 09/11/2023 |
| 4805 LANGLEY SNF REALTY LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/29/2019 |
| MDG REAL ESTATE GLOBAL LIMITED | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/29/2019 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 23 rows in the source record cover these 13 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 84% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.9M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 14% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in OH
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 366201. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-04-07, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.