Majestic Care of Columbus LLC

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.23 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 30% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 6% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 66.7 residents a day — about 56% occupied, or roughly 53 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.34 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.80 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.40 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.67 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.61 on weekdays — 20% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.87 to 0.62 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 51% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

24 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 13 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2025-01-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, hospital record review, review of the facility's incident/accident investigation, staff interview, and policy review the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive, individualized and effective fall management program to prevent a fall with injury for Resident #1. Actual harm occurred on 12/01/24 at approximately 12:55 P.M. when Resident #1, who had a diagnosis of dementia, fall risk with history of falls, increased lethargy and confusion sustained an avoidable unwitnessed fall out of bed resulting in head trauma/head hematoma which required hospital treatment. Prior to this fall, the resident sustained an unwitnessed fall out of bed on 12/01/24 at 1:30 A.M. with no evidence the facility implemented timely, adequate and effective interventions/measures to prevent the additional fall with injury on the same date. The resident was hospitalized until 12/09/24. Findings include: Record review revealed Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-09 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of a facility self-reported incident (SRI) and staff and resident interviews, the facility staff failed to ensure a resident was treated with respect/dignity. The affected one (#23) out one resident reviewed for resident rights. The facility census was 69. Findings include: Record review for Resident #23 revealed this resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses include dementia, encephalopathy, epilepsy, multiple sclerosis, bipolar disorder, major depressive disorders. Review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed this resident had intact cognition evidenced by a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15. This resident was assessed to require self-care assistance due to impaired physical mobility related to Multiple Sclerosis. Review of a facility SRI for emotional/verbal abuse dated 11/30/25 revealed on 11/27/25 at 7:00 A.M. Certified Nursing Assistant, (CNA) #94 and Resident #23 had a verbal altercation in which…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-09 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, staff interview, and review of a facility policy, the facility failed to ensure a resident's advanced directives matched in the paper and electronic health record. This affected one (#7) out of 26 residents in the initial sample. The facility census was 69. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #7 revealed an admission date of 08/03/22. Diagnoses include Alzheimer's disease with late onset, dementia in other diseases classified elsewhere with mood disturbance, paranoid schizophrenia, and severe protein-calorie malnutrition. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of five out of 15 indicating severe cognitive impairment. Review of the orders for Resident #7 revealed an order that stated, FULL CODE has as Do Not Resuscitate - comfort care (DNR-CC) but POA needs to sign, remains Full Code at this time. The banner at the top of the page of the electronic health record that indicated the code status also stated the same thing. Review of the advanced directive in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-09 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of a facility self-reported incident (SRI), staff and resident interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure allegations of abuse were timely reported to the State Agency. This affected one (#23) of one resident reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 69. Findings include: Record review for Resident #23 revealed this resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses include dementia, encephalopathy, epilepsy, multiple sclerosis, bipolar disorder, major depressive disorders. Review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed this resident had intact cognition evidenced by a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15. This resident was assessed to require self-care assistance due to impaired physical mobility related to Multiple Sclerosis. Review of a facility SRI for emotional/verbal abuse dated 11/30/25 revealed on 11/27/25 at 7:00 A.M. Certified Nursing Assistant, (CNA) #94 and Resident #23 had a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-09 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of a facility self-reported incident (SRI), review of a facility investigation, staff interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a thorough investigation was completed following a potential abuse incident. This affected one (#23) of four residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 69. Findings include: Record review for Resident #23 revealed this resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses dementia, encephalopathy, epilepsy, multiple sclerosis, bipolar disorder, major depressive disorders. Review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed this resident had intact cognition evidenced by a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15. This resident was assessed to require self-care assistance due to impaired physical mobility related to Multiple Sclerosis. Review of a facility SRI for emotional/verbal abuse dated 11/30/25 revealed on 11/27/25 at 7:00 A.M. Certified Nursing Assistant,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-12 · tag F0569 — isolated
  Notify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of resident funds, and interview, the facility failed to notify each resident, who received Medicaid benefits, when the amount in the resident's account reached $200 less than the Social Security Income resource limit for one person. This affected two residents (#6 and #48) out of four residents reviewed for personal funds. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #6 revealed an admission date of 12/09/18. Diagnoses include hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting left non-dominant side, type two diabetes, chronic combined systolic and diastolic heart failure, vascular dementia, hypothyroidism, schizoaffective disorder bipolar type, bipolar disorder, hyperlipidemia, chronic pulmonary edema, spinal stenosis, anxiety disorder, chronic respiratory failure, blindness left eye category four, muscle weakness, major depressive disorder, and chronic pain syndrome. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-12 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure appropriate care and services were provided, including dignity and proper technique, during routine suprapubic catheter care. This affected one (Resident #29) out of one resident reviewed for catheter care. The facility identified six residents with indwelling catheters. The facility census was 75. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #29 revealed an admission date of 01/29/25 with diagnoses of obstructive and reflux uropathy, major depressive disorder, insomnia, chronic pain syndrome and history of transient ischemic attack and cerebral infarction. Review of the care plan dated 01/30/25 revealed Resident #29 was at risk for infection/complications related to the use of a suprapubic catheter with the diagnosis of obstructive uropathy. Interventions included to document catheter output every shift, anchor the catheter to gravity drainage as ordered, catheter/peri-care at least every shift and as needed, and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-12 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, medical record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure pressure reducing devices were in place as ordered. This affected one (Resident #61) of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The census was 75. Findings Include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #61 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses were cerebral atherosclerosis, bipolar disorder, benign prostatic hyperplasia, dementia, moderate protein calorie malnutrition, hypertension, delusional disorder, anxiety disorder, insomnia, depression, violent behavior, psychosis, visual hallucinations, and Parkinsonism. The record revealed the resident did not have any active wounds. Review of Resident #61's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 03/05/25, revealed he was cognitively intact. Review of Resident #61's care plan dated 06/03/25 revealed a care area related to refusal of care and skin breakdown. The care plan stated he would refuse to allow preventative…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-12 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. Review of Resident #59's medical record revealed an admission date of 01/17/25 with diagnoses including bipolar disorder, emphysema, fusion of cervical spine, spinal stenosis, other chronic pain, lumbago with sciatica, and type two diabetes mellitus, Review of Resident #59's comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the resident had intact cognition and the resident received scheduled and as needed pain medications. Review of Resident #59's physician order dated 05/19/25 revealed an order for Percocet Oral tablet 325 milligrams (mg) one tablet by mouth every six hours as needed for pain. Review of Resident #59's plan of care revised 06/10/25 revealed the resident had pain related to sciatica pain radiating to legs and a chronic pain diagnosis. Interventions included administering medication as ordered, notifying the physician of unrelieved pain, observing for side effects of pain medications, observing for symptoms of non-verbal pain, offering nonpharmacological interventions, and reporting…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure infection control practices were implemented during routine suprapubic catheter care. This affected one (Resident #29) out of one resident reviewed for catheter care. The facility identified six residents with indwelling catheters. The facility census was 75. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #29 revealed an admission date of 01/29/25 with diagnoses of obstructive and reflux uropathy, major depressive disorder, insomnia, chronic pain syndrome and history of transient ischemic attack and cerebral infarction. Review of the care plan dated 01/30/25 revealed Resident #29 was at risk for infection/complications related to the use of a suprapubic catheter with the diagnosis of obstructive uropathy. Interventions included to document catheter output every shift, anchor the catheter to gravity drainage as ordered, catheter/peri-care at least every shift and as needed, and educate resident on risks of infection and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-01-14 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, staff interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure safe and sanitary storage of food and drink items in the kitchen to prevent contamination and/or spoilage. This had the potential to affect all 74 of 74 residents residing in the facility. Findings include Observation on 01/06/25 at 10:06 A.M. of Resident #68 revealed he had consumed chocolate milk from his breakfast tray that had a dated use by 01/04/25. Observations on 01/06/25 beginning at 12:20 P.M. in the facility kitchen revealed the following: In the freezer there was a serving of what appeared to be fish that was unlabeled and undated, green beans were open and undated, chicken fingers were open and undated and chocolate chip cookie dough was open to air and undated. In the refrigerator there were jars of mustard and Worcestershire sauce which were undated as well as an unknown brown juice that was undated. A plastic container with cinnamon apples was undated. A large open bag of baby carrots was found to have a use by date of 12/16/24. There were 14 chocolate milk containers in the walk…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

Fines & penalties

$111,283 in federal fines across 2 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

• $79,952 — penalty dated 2025-01-14
• $31,331 — penalty dated 2024-02-22
• Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-02-12 for 1 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to MAJESTIC CARE — 22 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 23 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 87% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.8M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 16% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH