No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Majestic Care Of Fairfield LLC

5200 Camelot Drive, Fairfield, OH 45014 · For profit - Individual · 200 certified beds · (513) 829-8100 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (513) 829-8100 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0602) — cited Jun 2024Resident-funds citation (F0569)
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0602), cited Jun 2024
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0569)
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (35) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
  • its last standard health inspection was over 3 years ago — the star rating may not reflect current conditions

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
Pharmacy
5484 Dixie Hwy · (513) 858-3784 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
5150 Camelot Dr · (513) 939-2025 · Call to confirm hours
Park
2 Jupiter Ct · (513) 867-5348 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased3.6%5.3%15.4%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight10.6%6.2%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.2%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.2%0.4%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms56.4%30.1%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.5%3.2%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened4.3%6.1%16.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication29.3%25.5%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine64.5%94.5%95.3%worse
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers5.5%3.4%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control31.5%21.4%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table7.6%8.8%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine20.0%75.6%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission26.6%24.9%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit18.5%12.9%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days0.541.731.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.681.801.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

42.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 88 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

42.4%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.2%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
38.1%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.18U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.06hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.09hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.02hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 38.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 21 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.18 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 17% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 9% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF42.4%CMS range 32.1–51.951.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.2%CMS range 8.1–15.310.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge38.1%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge28.6%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge47.6%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened2.8%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.3%CMS range 4.3–12.17.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.111.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.56
RN hours/ resident / day
1.18
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.77
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.50
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.44
RN hoursweekends
43.6%
Total nursing turnover
30.8%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 200 beds and averages 142.3 residents a day — about 71% occupied, or roughly 58 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.50 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.56 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.77 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.25 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.61 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.61 to 0.44 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 44% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

8
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2023-09-21)
7
at the previous standard inspection (2020-01-30)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 3 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

35 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 25 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-25 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and staff interview, facility failed to treat residents with dignity and respect. This affected two Residents (#39 and #106) of the three residents (#39, #106 and #110) reviewed for resident rights. Facility census was 138.Findings include:1) Medical record review for Residents #39 was admitted to facility on 09/11/24 with diagnosis including vascular dementia with psychotic mood disturbance, chronic pulmonary obstructive disease and osteoarthritis. Review or Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], revealed Resident #39 to be cognitively impaired. Resident required moderate assistance with toileting and bathing. Observations of the Memory Care Unit (MCU) on 06/22/26 at 2:04 P.M., revealed Resident #39 was knocking on nurse's station office door requesting assistance to the bathroom. One staff person who was not visible, stated to the resident just go to your room and go to the bathroom. Resident #39 again said she needed to go to the bathroom and another voice in the nurse's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, resident interview, staff interview, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure residents followed safe smoking practices which included smoking in their rooms. This affected two Residents (#111 and #112) out of three Residents (#105, #111, and #112) reviewed for smoking. The facility identified the following seventeen Residents (#04, #06, #10, #14, #15, #24, #27, #33, #38, #43, #47, #53, #62, #63, #77, #85, #105) as smokers. The facility census was 145.Findings include: 1) Review of the medical record for Resident #111 revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included emphysema, chronic angina, chronic kidney disease, anemia, hyperlipidemia, obstructive sleep apnea, fatty liver, major depressive disorder, edema, anxiety disorder, and congestive heart failure. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #111 was cognitively intact. The assessment did not indicate the resident utilized oxygen. Review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-03-18 · tag F0850 — failed to provide social-work services — widespread
    Hire a qualified full-time social worker in a facility with more than 120 beds.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to have a Licensed Social Worker to provide services to the residents. This had the potential to affect all of the residents in the facility. The facility census was 135 residents. Findings include: Observation on 03/11/25 at 3:30 P.M. revealed Social Work Consultant (SWC) #432 was working in the facility and providing services to residents. There was a sign on the office door which read Social Services. Further observation revealed there was no information posted in the office regarding SWC #432 license to practice as a social worker. Interview on 03/11/25 at 3:35 P.M. with the Administrator confirmed the facility did not have a Licensed Social Worker (LSW) employed with the facility. The Administrator confirmed the facility had a social services designee and an outside consultant, SWC #432, who came in two to three times per week and was available full time if needed. Interview on 03/12/25 at 1:15 P.M. with SWC #432 confirmed she had a bachelor's degree but was not an LSW. Interview on 03/12/25 at 2:20 P.M. with the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-09-09 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespread
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of facility posted signage, review of letter from Administrator, and staff interviews, the facility failed to administer the facility to ensure residents, families, and appropriate authorities were timely notified regarding a Legionella infection and potential water contamination in the facility. This had the potential to affect all residents. The facility census was 149. Findings include: Review of Resident #10's medical record revealed an admission date of 07/04/24. Resident #10 was discharged to the hospital on [DATE] and returned to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included: morbid obesity, essential hypertension, Legionnaires disease, cellulitis of lower limb, anemia, and pressure ulcer. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed he was cognitively intact. Further review of the MDS assessment revealed Resident #10 was dependent on staff for medication administration, toileting, personal hygiene, and he required assistance from staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-09-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of letter from Administrator, review of email correspondence from the local health department, policy reviews, review of water temperature audits, review of Environmental Assessment of Water Systems report, review of the third -party consultant action plan, review of infection control logs, review of contract with a Water Management Consultant Company and staff interviews, the facility failed to implement a water management program to prevent Legionella in the water system and report a case of Legionella to the local authorities. This affected one (#10) of three residents reviewed for Legionella and had the potential to affect all 149 residents residing at the facility. The facility census was 149. Findings include: Review of Resident #10's medical record revealed an admission date of 07/04/24. Resident #10 was discharged to the hospital on [DATE] and returned to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included: morbid obesity, essential hypertension, Legionnaires disease,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-09-09 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide a sanitary and comfortable environment for the residents, staff and public. This had the potential to affect the residents residing on the memory care unit, 200 and 300 halls. Census was 149. Findings include: Observations on 09/04/24 and 09/05/24, revealed discolored ceiling tiles and dark discoloration near sprinkler and sensor located in the ceiling in the 300 hallway. Interview on 09/05/24 at 6:35 A.M., with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #175 verified the discolored ceiling tiles. Observations on 09/04/24 and 09/05/24, revealed discolored ceiling observed near the light fixture and fire sensor outside room [ROOM NUMBER]. Interview on 09/05/24 at 7:02 A.M., with LPN #175 verified the discolored ceiling tiles. Observations on 09/04/24 and 09/05/24, revealed dark discoloration surrounding orange colored growth on ceiling tiles in the hallway outside of the 200 hall nurses' station and discoloration on multiple ceiling tiles and covering…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-24 · tag F0569 — isolated
    Notify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and review of resident fund account documents, the facility failed to ensure timely conveyance of resident funds following discharge. This affected one (#3) of three residents reviewed for funds post discharge. The facility census was 144. Findings include: Review of Resident #3's medical record revealed an admission date of [DATE]. Resident #3 passed away, in the facility, on [DATE]. Diagnoses included multiple sclerosis, pulmonary disease and chronic pain syndrome. Review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had intact cognition and was a two-person assist for Activities of Daily (ADL). Review of resident fund documents revealed on [DATE], Resident #03 had an account balance of $150.97. On the same date, the Social Security Administration (SSA) made a deposit of $1160.00 into the resident's account, for a total account balance of $1310.97. Further review revealed on [DATE] the account was closed and the total of $1310.97 was debited…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-24 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
    Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of a facility Self-Reported Incident (SRI), review of a local police report, staff interview, review of the county on-line court docket and review of facility policy, the facility failed ensure residents were free from misappropriation. This affected one resident (#1) of five residents reviewed for misappropriation. The facility census was 144. Findings include: Review of Resident #1's medical record revealed an admission date of 06/06/23. The resident discharged on 05/24/24. Diagnoses included hemiplegia, chronic respiratory failure, muscle weakness and dystonia. Review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had intact cognition and was a one-person assist for Activities of Daily (ADL). Review of the facility SRI #240101, initiated 10/12/23 and completed on 10/17/24, revealed on 10/12/23, the facility was notified by Resident #1 and her family that the resident was missing a check from her checkbook. Per the SRI, all staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-24 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of a facility Self-Reported Incident (SRI), review of the facility investigation, review of a local police report, staff interview, review of the county on-line court docket and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure an accurate and thorough investigation of misappropriation was completed. Furthermore, the facility failed to implement corrective actions to monitor and/or prevent further instances of resident misappropriation. This affected one resident (#1) of five residents reviewed for misappropriation. The facility census was 144. Findings include: Review of Resident #1's medical record revealed an admission date of 06/06/23. The resident discharged on 05/24/24. Diagnoses included hemiplegia, chronic respiratory failure, muscle weakness and dystonia. Review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had intact cognition and was a one-person assist for Activities of Daily (ADL). Review of the facility SRI…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff and resident interview, review of facility's Self-Reported Incidents (SRIs) and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure care and services were provided by staff members. This affected one (#51) resident out of three residents reviewed for accidents hazards. The facility census was 155. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #51 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included anoxic brain damage, hyperlipidemia, dysphagia, anxiety disorder, gastro esophageal reflux disease (GERD), insomnia, mood disorder, major depressive disorder, and aphasia. Review of a nurse's progress notes dated 01/12/23 for Resident #51, revealed the staff spoke with Resident#51's father and the resident's roommate (Resident #57) about Resident #57 providing Resident #51 with fluids. Notes indicated Resident #51's father instructed Resident #57 to still give the resident fluids and stated Resident #57 could provide the fluids if he gave…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 25 citations
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-02-01 · tag F0837 — widespread
    Establish a governing body that is legally responsible for establishing and implementing policies for managing and operating the facility and appoints a properly licensed administrator responsible for managing the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of Board of Executives of Long-Term Services and Support (BELTSS) documentation, review of the Enhanced Information Dissemination and Collection (EIDC), interview with a BELTSS Representative, and staff interview, the facility governing body failed to appoint an administrator, licensed in the State of Ohio who was responsible for the management of the facility. This had the potential to affect all 150 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: On [DATE], review of the State Agency EIDC System revealed Administrator #400 was listed as the facility current and primary Administrator with an effective date of [DATE]. On [DATE], review of the BELTSS system revealed Administrator #400's license was inactive. Interview with BELTSS Representative #100 on [DATE] at 10:44 A.M. indicated their website (https://prod.beltss.age.ohio.gov/) for licensure verification was up to date and had no system issues. BELTSS #100 representative verified the Administrator was not active and the license expired…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-02-01 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, resident interview, review of resident council meeting minutes, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure food was served warm and palatable. This had the potential to affect all but two (#27 and #93) residents who did not receive food from the facility's kitchen. The facility census was 150. Findings include: Observation of the kitchen on 02/01/24 at 8:20 A.M. revealed a test tray went out on the 2B unit cart. All trays were retrieved from the meal cart on 07/03/23 at 8:34 A.M. The scrambled eggs, served on a Styrofoam plate and covered with an insulated lid, were 110 degrees Fahrenheit and cold to taste. Interview on 02/01/24 at 8:35 A.M., Account Manager (AM) #315 verified the scrambled eggs were cold and not palatable. AM #315 further stated the facility's dishwasher had been out since 12/22/23 and the facility often had to serve on disposable dinner ware. Interview on 02/01/24 at 10:11 A.M. Resident #69 stated the food was usually served cold. Interview on 02/01/24 at 10:21 A.M., Resident #52 stated the food was often served cold.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-12-21 · tag F0694 — pattern
    Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NON-COMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on medical record review, review of the State of Ohio Board of Pharmacy Terminal Distributor Licensure of Prescriber Practices, review of facility policy, staff interview, and interview with contracted entity provider representative, the facility failed to ensure a contracted entity had appropriate State of Ohio required credentials for provision of services for residents. This affected four (#03, #26, #23 and #36) of the four residents reviewed for medications administered by a contracted ancillary provider. This also affected 40 additional current Residents (#01, #02, #09, #10, #11, #12, #13, #16,, #17, #18, #19, #20, #22, #28, #31, #32, #33, #34, #35, #37, #39, #40, #41, #42, #43, #44, #45, #46, #48, #49, #51, #52, #53, #55, #56, #57, #58, #60, #61, and #62) and 15 discharged Residents (#04, #05, #06, #08, #14, #15, #21, #25, #27, #29, #30, #47, #50, #54, and #59) for total of 59…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-21 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NON-COMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on medical record review, review of the State of Ohio Board of Pharmacy Terminal Distributor Licensure of Prescriber Practices, and interview the facility failed to ensure medications were obtained from a source with a Terminal Distributor of Dangerous Drugs (TDDD) license (which allows a business entity to purchase, possess, and/or distribute dangerous drugs at a specific location) specific to the State of Ohio. This affected four (#03, #26, #23 and #36) of the four residents reviewed for medications administered by a contracted ancillary provider. This also affected 40 additional current Residents (#01, #02, #09, #10, #11, #12, #13, #16,, #17, #18, #19, #20, #22, #28, #31, #32, #33, #34, #35, #37, #39, #40, #41, #42, #43, #44, #45, #46, #48, #49, #51, #52, #53, #55, #56, #57, #58, #60, #61, and #62) and 15 discharged Residents (#04, #05, #06, #08, #14, #15, #21, #25, #27, #29, #30,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-21 · tag F0837 — pattern
    Establish a governing body that is legally responsible for establishing and implementing policies for managing and operating the facility and appoints a properly licensed administrator responsible for managing the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 837 THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NON-COMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on medical record review, review of the State of Ohio Board of Pharmacy Terminal Distributor Licensure of Prescriber Practices, review of facility policy, and interview the facility failed to ensure a contracted entity had appropriate State of Ohio required credentials for provision of services for residents. This deficiency affected four of four Residents (#27, #89, #85, and #30) reviewed for medications administered by a contracted ancillary provider. This affected four (#03, #26, #23 and #36) of the four residents reviewed for medications administered by a contracted ancillary provider. This also affected 40 additional current Residents (#01, #02, #09, #10, #11, #12, #13, #16,, #17, #18, #19, #20, #22, #28, #31, #32, #33, #34, #35, #37, #39, #40, #41, #42, #43, #44, #45, #46, #48, #49, #51, #52, #53, #55, #56, #57, #58, #60, #61, and #62) and 15 discharged Residents (#04, #05,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-31 · tag F0742 — isolated
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with mental disorder or psychosocial adjustment difficulty, or who has a history of trauma and/or post-traumatic stress disorder.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide a resident with appropriate behavioral health treatment and services. This affected one (#152) out of the three residents reviewed for behaviors. The facility census was 159. Findings included: Review of the medical record for Resident #152 revealed an admission date of 03/29/23 with medical diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and anxiety. Further review revealed Resident #152 went on leave of absence (LOA) with his daughter on 10/20/23 and was discharged from the facility on 10/26/23. Review of the medical record for Resident #152 revealed a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], which indicated Resident #152 had moderate cognitive impairment and required supervision with bed mobility, transfers, toileting, eating, and bathing. The MDS did not indicate Resident #152 had any behaviors. Review of the medical record for Resident #152 revealed a psychiatry progress note, dated 10/13/23,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-31 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, ophthalmologist interview, and policy review, the facility failed to administer eye medications (anti-glaucoma and antibiotic) as ordered resulting in significant medication errors. This affected one (#296) resident out of the three residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 159. Findings included: Review of the medical record for Resident #296 revealed an admission date of 07/10/23 with medication diagnoses of osteomyelitis of vertebra and sacral region, congestive heart failure, end stage renal disease, dialysis dependent, and diabetes mellitus. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #296 discharged on 10/08/23. Review of the medical record for Resident #296 revealed an admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE] which indicated Resident #296 was cognitively intact and required extensive staff assistance for bed mobility, transfers, and toileting. Review of the medical record for Resident #296 revealed a Certified Nurse…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-31 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record reviews, observations, staff interviews, and policy reviews, the facility failed to ensure infection control policies and procedures were followed. This affected two (#218 and #268) out of the four residents reviewed for infection control procedures. The facility census was 159. Findings included: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #218 revealed an admission date of 09/02/22 with medical diagnoses of hypothyroidism, hypertensive heart disease, and dementia. Review of the medical record for Resident #218 revealed a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], which indicated Resident #218 had moderate cognitive impairment and required extensive staff assistance with bed mobility, eating, toileting and was dependent upon staff for transfers and bathing. Review of the medical record for Resident #218 revealed a care plan, dated 03/16/23, which stated resident has a history of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDRO), history of Extended Spectrum [NAME] Lactamase (ESBL) and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-09-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to food was stored in a manner to prevent the potential spread of foodborne illness, the facility failed to ensure kitchen equipment was maintained in a clean manner, the facility failed to ensure utensils placed on meal trays were not handled by the eating surface and the facility failed to ensure foods reached the appropriate cooking temperature prior to serving. This had the potential to affect 156 out of 156 residents in the facility who received food from the kitchen, the facility identified two residents (#06 and #108) who did not receive food from the kitchen. The facility census was 158. Findings include: 1. Observations on 09/11/23 at 9:20 A.M. during the initial tour of the kitchen revealed the following: a). In the walk-in freezer, there was a box of crab cakes, a box of vegetarian chicken nuggets, and a box of vegetarian breakfast burritos which were all left with the inside plastic bag cut open and left open to air. b). In the dry storage area, there was a large box of of rice observed with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-09-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observations, staff interviews, facility policy review and review of information from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the facility failed to implement infection control practices to potentially prevent the spread of infectious diseases such as Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) and/or Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter Baumannii (CRAB). Additionally, the facility failed to develop and follow an infection disease program to aide in the potential spread of urinary tract infections (UTI) based on the facility identified concern from January 2023 through August 2023. This had the potential to affect all 158 residents who resided in the facility. The facility census was 158. Findings include: 1. Record review for Resident #259 revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included supraventricular tachycardia, Myasthenia Gravis, and restless leg syndrome and COVID-19. Review of the New admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-09-21 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, resident and staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure care conferences were held with residents. This affected four (#03, #97, #108, and #145) of six residents reviewed for care conferences. The facility census was 158. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record of Resident #03 revealed an admission date of 02/02/17. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), essential hypertension, hypothyroidism, bipolar disorder, peripheral vascular disease, major depressive disorder, and type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic neuropathy. Review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had intact cognition. Interview on 09/11/23 at 1:00 P.M., Resident #03 stated the last time she had a care conference was approximately five years ago. Review of care conference notes revealed the resident had care conferences on 12/18/20 and 03/23/21. Interview on 09/13/23 at 12:47 P.M., Regional Nurse…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to provide adequate interventions and/or supervision to ensure a resident who was assessed as being at risk for elopements did not elope from the facility and failed to ensure the an exterior gate on the secured unit was functioning appropriately. This affected one (#14) out of three residents reviewed for elopements and had the potential to affect 30 (#104, #39, #36, #48, #101, #27, #143, #14, #308, #58, #116, #149, #141, #62, #24, #70, #114, #94, #99, #60, #63, #28, #137, #151, #154, #133, #118, #153, #91, and #83) residents residing on the secured unit who were at risk for elopement. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure fall interventions were in place and to ensure safe transfers. This affected three (#99, #16, and #149) of eight residents reviewed for accidents. The facility census was 158. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record of Resident #14 revealed an admission date of 09/20/19. Diagnoses…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-21 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to accurately document on the Minimum Data Set (MDS) related to a residents bladder function. This affected one (#34) out of 31 residents reviewed for MDS. The facility census was 158. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #34 revealed an admission date of 06/12/21. Diagnoses included hypertensive heart disease with heart failure, atrial fibrillation, dementia, congestive heart failure, repeated falls, and history of urinary tract infections. Review of the Significant Change MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #34 had severe cognitive impairment as evidenced by a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of five. This resident was assessed to require one-person total dependence with dressing, one-person extensive assistance with eating, two-person extensive assistance with toileting, and two-person total dependence with bathing. Review of the MDS section H for bowel and bladder dated 08/12/23 revealed Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-21 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided with necessary care to maintain good personal hygiene. This affected three (#97, #16 and #149) of three reviewed for care of dependent residents. This census was 158. Findings included: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #97 revealed an admission date of 08/19/20. Diagnoses included dementia, major depressive disorder, type two diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease stage 3B, and atrial fibrillation. Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #97 had moderate cognitive impairment as evidenced by a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11. This resident was assessed to require two-person total dependence with transfers, one-person extensive assistance with dressing, bathing, and toileting, and supervision with eating. Observations on 09/11/23, 09/12/23, and 09/13/23 during the annual survey, Resident #97 had chin hairs about…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-21 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to provide medication per physician ordered. This affected one (#149) out of three residents reviewed for medication administration. Facility census was 158. Findings Included: Review of medical record for Resident #142 revealed an admission date of 12/13/22. Diagnoses included open wound of abdominal wall left lower quadrant without penetration into peritoneal cavity (non-orthopedic surgery) 06/12/23, local infections of skin and subcutaneous tissue, pressure ulcer of right heel stage four, pressure ulcer of left ankle stage four, pressure ulcer of part of back stage four, pressure ulcer of left heel stage four, pressure ulcer of unspecified site stage three, pressure ulcer right hip unstageable, and carrier of suspected carrier of methicillin resistant staphylococcus aureus on 02/24/23. Review of Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #142 had a BIMS of 07/17/23 revealed resident BIMS was 15 that indicated he was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2020-01-30 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interviews, and review of planned menus, the facility failed to follow the planned menus which had been reviewed and approved by the Registered Dietitian (RD) in regards to portion sizes. This affected 28 (#50, 55, 99, 155, 4, 157, 35, 31, 67, 182, 19, 46, 71, 68, 169, 90, 102, 48, 126, 30, 91, 158, 49, 167, 143, 52, 51, 153) of 28 residents in the 5B/600 unit. The facility census was 196. Findings include: Observations on 01/29/20 of the meal service in the 5B/600 unit dining room began at 12:18 P.M. The food arrived to the unit at 12:18 P.M. and temperatures of the hot food were taken by Dietary Staff (DS) #92 at 12:22 P.M. The temperatures of the hot foods were all within acceptable parameters. DS #92 then began portioning food onto plates for residents in the 5B/600 unit dining room. Observation on 01/29/20 at 12:37 P.M. of the portion sizes of the food being served was checked and verified by DS #92 and Dietary Supervisor (DSP) #76 who was present throughout the observation. The portion sizes served were then checked against the planned menu which…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2020-01-30 · tag F0636 — isolated
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview and review of the Resident Assessment Instrument Manual the facility failed to comprehensively assess a residents cognitive in her native language. This affected one of one reviewed for cognitive function. The facility census is 196. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #109 revealed an admission on [DATE], with diagnoses including to syncope and collapse, colostomy, protein malnutrition, abdominal abscess, abnormal heart rate, heart disease, kidney disease, pain in left leg, dizziness, depressive disorder, anxiety, anemia, perforation on the intestine, pacemaker, ulcer on left heel due to poor circulation and high blood pressure. Review of quarterly Minimum Data Assessment (MDS) assessment for Resident #109 dated 12/28/19 revealed the resident was coded as rarely or never understood and the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) was not completed. Review of quarterly MDS assessment for Resident #109 dated 12/09/19 revealed resident was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2020-01-30 · tag F0637 — isolated
    Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview and review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) the facility failed to complete a comprehensive significant change assessment. This affected one (#109) of one resident reviewed for significant change assessments. The facility census is 196. Findings include: Medical record review for Resident #109 reveals an admission on [DATE] with diagnosis that include but not limited to syncope and collapse, colostomy, protein malnutrition, abdominal abscess, abnormal heart rate, heart disease, kidney disease, pain in left leg, dizziness, depressive disorder, anxiety, anemia, perforation on the intestine, pacemaker, ulcer on left heel due to poor circulation and high blood pressure. Review of quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #109 dated 12/04/19 revealed a total severity score for mood of eleven (a score indicating potential depression symptoms between 00 and 27). Resident #109 requires extensive assist with one staff member for bed mobility, transfers and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-01-30 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to code a MDS assessment accurately. This affected one (#109) of four residents reviewed for accurate assessments. The facility census is 196. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #109 revealed an admission on [DATE], with diagnoses including to syncope and collapse, colostomy, protein malnutrition, abdominal abscess, abnormal heart rate, heart disease, kidney disease, pain in left leg, dizziness, depressive disorder, anxiety, anemia, perforation on the intestine, pacemaker, ulcer on left heel due to poor circulation and high blood pressure. Review of quarterly Minimum Data Assessment (MDS) assessment for Resident #109 dated 11/22/19 for Resident #109 was silent for falls. Review of quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #109 revealed resident was silent as having a colostomy (artificial opening into the large intestine for the evacuation of fecal matter). Review of plan of care for Resident #109 dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-01-30 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, medical record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure fingernails were trimmed and clean. This affected one resident (#161) of one resident reviewed for assitance with activities of daily care. The facility census was 196. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #161 revealed an admission date of 01/02/20, with diagnoses including: heart attack, mild cognitive impairment, heart disease, dementia, prostate disorder, malnutrition, depression, high blood pressure, high cholesterol and Alzheimer's disease. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #161 revealed severly impaired cognition. Resident #161 required extensive assist for bed mobility, transfers, eating, toileting and personal hygiene. Review of the plan of care for activities of daily living (ADL) for Resident #161 revealed a performance deficit related to urinary tract infection, Alzheimer's disease (with behaviors), heart disease, leg swelling-right,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2020-01-30 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident did not receive an unnecessary medications, when the physician ordered parameters for administration were not followed. This affected one (#37) of one residents reviewed for dialysis medication. The facility census was 196. Finding include: Review of the medical record for Resident #37 revealed an admission date of 02/18/15 with diagnoses including end stage renal disease, hypertension and heart failure. Review of Resident #37's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had mildly impaired cognition and required extensive assist for bed mobility and transfer. The resident was independent for eating. Review of the care plan dated 11/15/19 revealed resident was a dialysis patient and had interventions in place related to his access site, dietary, and transportation. Review of Resident #37's physician orders revealed an order was written on 01/09/20 for Midodrine HCL Tablet (a medication used to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-01-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure infection control measures were followed during a treatment to a wound. This affected one (#49) of seven residents reviewed for infection control. The facility census was 196. Findings include: Review of Resident #49's medical record revealed an admission date of 02/20/12, with diagnoses including congestive heart failure, coronary artery disease, hypertension, peripheral vascular disease, malnutrition, anxiety, rheumatoid arthritis, muscle weakness, stage 4 pressure ulcer of the sacrum. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 11/07/19, identified Resident #49 as being cognitively impaired. The MDS also identified a stage 4 pressure ulcer over the resident's sacrum. Review of the physician's orders revealed that Resident #49 was to have the sacral wound cleaned with Dakins (a antibiotic solution that kills or prevents the growth of bacteria or germs in a wound), pat dry, gently pack with a Calcium Alginate (topical wound dressing ). Then apply Chamosyn (a skin protectant)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2018-11-29 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to accurately code the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for two (#139 and #4) of 38 records reviewed during phase two of the survey. The total facility census was 180. Findings include: 1. Record review for Resident #139 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included chronic kidney disease stage four, weakness, venous insufficiency, carotid artery syndrome, hypotension, bipolar disorder, morbid obesity, personality and behavioral disorder, hypothyroidism, diabetes mellitus, and depression. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 10/17/18, revealed Resident #139 had mild cognitive impairment. The assessment was coded indicating the resident was receiving hospice services. Review of Resident #139's orders revealed the resident had no order for hospice services. Interview on 11/26/18 at 5:40 P.M., with Resident #139 denied having hospice services. Interview with Licensed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2018-11-29 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure activities were provided according to resident interest for three (#42, #136, and #11) of five residents reviewed for activities. The census was 180. Findings include: 1. Medical record review for Resident #42 revealed an admission date of 02/09/09. Diagnoses included non-Alzheimer's dementia. Review of annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 09/05/18, revealed Resident #42 was cognitively impaired. Review of the activity assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident preferred to stay in her room and enjoyed one to one visits. Review of the activity participation form for Resident #42 revealed from 09/03/18 to 09/12/18, from 09/16/18 to 10/02/18, from 10/09/18 to 10/17/18, and from 10/18/18 to 11/07/18 there was no documentation of activities being offered or provided. Observations of Resident #42 on 11/26/18 at 11:00 A.M. and 11/27/18 at 10:26 A.M. revealed the resident was lying in bed. On 11/28/18 at 9:01…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2023-09-21 · tag F0623 — pattern
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the Ombudsmen was notified for hospital transfers and discharges. This affected five (#25, #78, #108, #131, and #157) out of six residents reviewed for discharges. The facility census was 158. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #78 revealed an admission date of 04/18/23. Diagnoses included Entercolitis due to clostridium difficile, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), acute kidney disease, and adjustment disorder with anxiety. Review of the Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #78 had moderate cognitive impairment as evidenced by a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12. This resident was assessed to require two-person total dependence with transfers, one-person extensive assistance with dressing and toileting, one-person limited assistance eating, and one-person total dependence with bathing. Review of the medical record for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to MAJESTIC CARE — 22 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 52.5-0.5 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.1-0.1 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 51.7+0.3 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 54.5-0.5 vs chain
The other 21 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.5★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
RB SNF OPERATIONS HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 10/01/2020
PRUITT, PAULIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/01/2023
5200 CAMELOT DRIVE SNF REALTY LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2020
MAJESTIC MANAGEMENT LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/11/2025
ALI, ASADIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
CHAMBERLAIN, MARGARETIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 09/11/2023
GIBBONEY, BRIANIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
MARX, DAVIDIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2020
REWA, ANGELAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/23/2023
RUSSELL, ROBERTIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/08/2024
SHATROV, ANZHELIKAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/02/2024
WOLFE, ERICIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 09/11/2023
RB SNF REAL ESTATE HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2020

CMS files one row per role, so the 25 rows in the source record cover these 13 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$17.6M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-0.8%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$2.9M
Related-party expense16% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 78%Medicare 3%Other / private 19%

About 78% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $2.9M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 16% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$322per resident / day
operating cost
$9,776per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$319per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Ohio
$9,186/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,389/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,103/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 365396. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2023-09-21, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next